the latest scientific know disproves Darwin's theory. it also proves the biblical accounts of creation is correct. Listen to Dr Hugh Ross and he'll explain everything you need to know.
By labeling it "magical thinking" you have shown your own bias. Once you use labels like that for the opposing position it is just obvious you have made up your mind before even hearing the arguments.
+Whispermast , by definition, if it isn't purely natural then it is magic. Here's the definition from Google: mag·ic ˈmajik noun 1. the power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces.
+Bernie Dehler As I said, you have assumed it is supernatural without any reason to assume that. Same for mysterious. Religion is perfectly natural, every bit as much as science is. Consider Clarke's Third law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke
Whispermast wrote: "Religion is perfectly natural, every bit as much as science is." Do you think it is natural for a guy to walk on water or change water into wine?
SecHummer The Jesus lizard walks on water. Maybe Jesus knows a way to increase surface tension of water. Clarke's third law is that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. he may be using some completely natural way of doing what he did, if you just knew what it was.
Magic. He spoke (incantation), and it happened. mag·ic ˈmajik noun 1. the power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces.
