Marvin Hagler vs. Gennady Golovkin: Fantasy fight predictions from the Mayweather Boxing Club 

True, even so I’m sure Tyson coulda put him on his back if landed right on the chin

Did the doctors tell him that?

@@vincemeyers2064 of course. ThAts mike tyson

Ggg has a strong chin too though

@@ceramikxxx5882 they measured his skull. ie the muscle on his temple was so thick, that it was like having a football helmet under his skin.

Lol Marvin puts that joker out inside the distance

​@@arster2935Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

So who has ggg fought that was a hard puncher?? An Don’t say Canelo. His chin has never been tested and y’all hype him up

@@ascendediamjacobs gave GGG a tough fight, Hagler arguably beat sugar ray leonard (one of the greatest ever)

@@raulelblanco781 video on my page compares a '80s Leonard to his last match watch that, then delete this odd comment made to me as if it made any sense to make to me, and that was a 97 srl, he also would advanced in early 00, then upgrade again maybe once in the mid which would be a small amount in 5 years than 5 more years and then 5 more years this is all if he started his career in late 90s, Hagler and every other 80s fighter would follow the same pattern if they fought for that long had they came in late 90s or early 00s

@@arster2935 ggg fought way more advanced people so you make no sense at all,Hagler fought like a 80s type fighter

He isn't better in anything fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Hell nah 😂 Marvin would work GGG

Lol delete this comment man

@@ascendediamGGG resume shows he’s never beaten any greats.

@@ascendediam GGG style is outdated, he’s not a pure boxer, he’s a come forward 1 dimensional puncher who puts pressure.

@@ascendediam obviously it does, that channel isn’t accurate, while pros have said Hagler beats GGG. I rather take it from them.

No middleweight KOs hagler you muppet

Dream on!!!

Hell no 😂

in Yo dreams

​@@disgruntledarmadillo6267Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

@Rakshit Joshi but those 400 amateur fights only get you so far look what happened to lomachenko he had a lot of amateur fights but yet he still lost in the pros also hagglers boxing skills is underrated people forget how he can switch from Orthodox to southpaw

Tbf GGG is also nearly impossible to knock out. I definitely have Hagler winning the fight but it would definitely go the distance.

@@jonathanrobbins3300 He lost two fights. In one he was arguably robbed (and fouled non stop), in the other he fought 2-3 classes above his natural weight, against much bigger guys. And he lost that fight because he didn't do enough early rounds. In a rematch he wins, imo.

​@@calebcaleb9808Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

The correct choice all people who say hag is a slow follower who doesn't watch full rounds,hags whole era was very basic compared to 90s let alone now Fight film has a video comparing and hag basically looks like a amateur to how the average fighter fights now

It's really lunacy to pick a obviously outdated person to beat a way more advanced one Nba/Soccer/baseball/Nascar/mma/tennis these sports have shown advances with from 70s-90s and then 90s-now on average In none of these sports have the average person from a era 10 years in the past Been more advanced,that's not how it works,people become more advanced in future,they don't time travel from the past learn advances and travel back,that's basically what everyone is doing by picking hag

​​@@ascendediamnonsense. There many more layers for every kind of sport. But in this case - especially boxing: weak mentallity. Todays era are filled with easy money, quick route to title shots, and shitload of exposure. In the old days you were literally hungry. Ypu fought for a loaf of bread. How many fights did ggg had before his title shot? Well hagler got a title shot in his 50th fight. And won the title in his 53rd fight. Anyway - just judge their styles and analise (because just claiming that every thing in boxing that matters is date, or fancy new equipment): Ggg was slower, less mobile, less work rate and his great jab would almost never land on hagler who was a southpaw, but also the best switch fighter, was exceppent inside and outside, and would not move or back down by GGG punches. He faced hearns and migabi - both punch harder and ggg would not land big blows as often as these guys did. Honestly - lets put aside this h2h match up - do you actually think this hw era is better than ali, frazier, foreman, norton? Or do you actually think that todays welterweights are better, more proven and more skilled than hearns, leonard, duran, benitez? If judging by your words - you do, and im personally surprised and do not think so. There are better eras and weaker eras - regardless of date. Btw - many people say that this hw era is the worst one since the camera was invented.. im not sure i agree with this claim but to me its not that far from it. And to me - the real lunacy is automatically picking a fighter because he is from a newer era. Its like your saying you pick joe joyce over joe louis or muhammad ali (which i hope you dont). Date is the last factor in a sport that brings figjters from hunger. Its mostly mentallity (or lack of it). Today these "fighters" are more concerned with their selfies, number of followers and cool stories. That is lunacy

@@eranliber5993 Srl vs. Duran full match, both are mostly brawling, they have their feet mostly when they throw shots planted right in front of their opponent, they usually throw shots with the same patterns, and they use angles but they aren't complex, a lot of times instead of using defense they brawl, they look hesitant a lot as unsure. Also their feet movement is very sluggish/moving in straight lines Every early-mid 80s fighter had multiple ways of this style it was all they knew,along with multiple other areas they were missing stuff even compared to the Average in 90s No ggg style existed in the 80s. What you will find if you watch people who fought in all his matches is that you will find multiple people who fought with some stuff GG did. You won't find one person who did all of what GGG did, which makes your pick for Hagler invalid and odd. You can't even name anybody as advanced as guys who didn't fight in the 80s; you're trolling the wrong person. I see every outdated or updated technology and flaws of each era. Any words you say to me are a waste. I can either keep destroying you or ignore you for trolling since you can't make me not see advances with the words you use. Words don't matter to me You slow guys for some odd reason look at how legends did vs guys using tech and flaws of their era,I look at what exist from future era flaws and tech and compares,see the difference?

@@ascendediam alright brother. Good talk and you do seem very intelligent and open minded. Have a good one

Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Never that

​@@noahthedestroyer3294Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Nobody is destroying GGG, GGG has great footwork, great durability, good power and he isn't easy to hit when he doesn't want to be hit.

Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated 😊

Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Lol you don’t know shit about boxing..

​@arster2935 Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated

Same size as Canelo if not bigger

Hagler had a longer reach than tei0le g too, i think like a 75 or 76 inch

Not really sure how you think that. Same height, Hagler with a huge reach advantage and in better shape.

@@AidanCulverREAL people forget how he can switch to Orthodox to southpaw

just look at the video where they come up together,,, youll see at some point Hagler looks even bigger than golovkin

He barely beat Canelo

@@edwarddavis6214 golovkin past his prime and still stood toe to toe with a young prime canelo

Yea in his era only way to outdated to compete with 90s and now

I see you smoking something strong.

​@josesoto9335 yup cause ggg is way to advanced

You people don't watch matches,hag and his whole era were very basic and flawed compared to 90s,let alone the 00s-now,hag would be destroyed 1st round Those dudes look even worst than amateurs from the years I said,said as the 70s they look very basic and flawed even compared to 80s-90s I have video of a fool saying how frazier would've been the best pressure fighter usky ever fought,vid on my page shows joe wasnt close to as advanced as a amateur pressure fighter Usky fought..... like stop picking these very dated fighters to give tough matches to people way more advanced than their whole era..

@@ascendediam it would be a war, both guys can throw caution to the wind. Haggler in my opinion beat Sugar Ray Leonard, who absolutely was an all time great. I didn’t say anything about Frazier vs Usyk, that’s a different can of worms. The skill level has gotten tremendously better, I tend to pick the more modern fighters in these fantasy fights, but GGG is more of an old school fighter anyway. I do watch matches, and when we make these predictions you have to adjust your thoughts based on the era. No way he is destroyed first round.

@@ascendediam the Usyk Frazier fight would expose too much of a gap in skills between now and then, I would absolutely pick Usyk. This is just a different fight.

@strubang6563 let's stop this now,answer this name the person who hag/duran/srl fought as advanced as the average 90s let alone 00s-now fighter,if you can't name mutiple fighters they fought as advanced as these guys,you're pick for hag is of a fiction version that never existed,all of you people play this make believe stuff like kids Hag and his whole era the real versions of that whole 80s would be destroyed And fast by the average 90s-now they just are and were way more advanced So it doesn't matter what you say

@strubang6563 I have a video on my page of a troll saying if usyk had fought frazier that Frazier would've been the best pressure fighter Usky fought,frazier wasnt even as advanced as the amateur usyk fought who was a pressure fighter,let alone derek who was a patient slugger pressure type,those 2 in that vid would've absolutely destroyed george and his whole era I also have vid showing exposing another troll saying ace a no name wasn't more advanced than and wasn't the modern liston,liston looks horrible but lunatics for years said he would beat guys In 80s-now

George and Mike as middleweights? Strange.

@dashauncarney9651 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time for his style in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd

Wrong Srl vs. Duran full match, both are mostly brawling, they have their feet mostly when they throw shots planted right in front of their opponent, they usually throw shots with the same patterns, and they use angles but they aren't complex, a lot of times instead of using defense they brawl, they look hesitant a lot as unsure. Also their feet movement is very sluggish/moving in straight lines These are the reason along with mutiple other outdated ways the 80s guys fought

Yeah your idols best win was against a garbage fighter. What does that make Canelo? Hagler beats both of them.

@@AlTarif canelo ain’t my idol lol

@@josesoto9335 Andre Ward is overrated as well. Only Canelo fans and Ward fans say Little G.

@@AlTarif he’s so overrated GGG clearly DUCKED HIM.

​@@AlTariffightfilm shows Hagler was way to outdated so no

A man who fought in 80s,good joke no fighter even In that era was as advanced as the average in 90s Ggg beat people way more advanced than Ben was in amateur,it was no one like ggg in 80s

Who have you fought dum ass

Stop trolling Hagler goat

Who's mugabi..? What are you on player

interesting points