Even small construction companies can make a fuck ton for anyone that misinterprets the "executive" bit. Hell even could be a regular employee dicking about on site
@@ANasCarBoi these just look like the bald commuter OEMs that came on mine its a wonder it even got thru that lol they dont come with ATs from factory…things rip once you put some real tires on but then ride even worse then stock
That thing did just about as good as my suburban does when Iam in a mud hole woth bald tires And thats pretty good but, I know that the g wagons got 4x4 in its DNA since it's basically always been 4x4
@@localenterprisebroadcastin5971 hah ya that cant be argued with. It just depends on the type of person someone is. Most people dont have it in them to deal with that and thats why not everyone can have lambos and ferraris 🤷♂️ but also collecting is sometimes fun 😉
The G Wagen was originally created to serve as a military vehicle for Germany in the same way the Willys jeep was for America. It's only more recently that they became a luxury vehicle, but they still have the off-roading engineering underneath.
@@yourmomsfbuddy1177 whistlin diesel did an insane Offroad test with one of these, I was genuinely surprised how well they perform off road, just a shame that theyre usually only driven to flex in the city
@@mchungleplumble judging by the views on this video a couple hundred thousand people disagree…people like seeing expensive autos messing around, that clapped F150 is clean as a whistle and looks like a 2wd i doubt it went thru the same path
Then a $25k Toyota doing what $6k G-Wagen from 1980 can do :) But seriously no. The $25k Toyota doesnt have the 3 diff locks. So would probably be stuck there.
@@sashaghovanlou8175 I had just assumed; my information's old. But I'm doing some digging now, and it looks like the idea for the truck was originally commissioned by the Shah of Iran for military use, but that order ended up being cancelled when he was forced out of office by the Islamic revolution. But Mercedes went forward with production, simultaneously for military and civilian use. In an interestingly contradicting article I found from what appears to be an official Mercedes site, *_"Although the G was not designed as a military vehicle,_* there were already deliberations during the development phase in the mid-1970s on how an army variant could be derived from the off-road vehicle." Makes me wonder if MB is trying to separate themselves from the Shah that supposedly made the original request for the car, or if the concept for a civilian truck had already been announced and the Shah just wanted a more capable variant.
@@iExcIuded Does all of the landscaping equipment and packs of Modelos classify it as “bone stock”, still? If so, yes. Amazing guess. You’re King of the Internet, this month.
People seem to forget that the G wagon has always been a very capable off-road vehicle, but just cause it bares the star people think that it has to be a pavement princess...well that and the insane price tag!
