MiG-35 - the new generation of a legend 

@Einstein Just look at the ISS, a station from an US idea build on an Russian base with a lot of parts from around the world, most of them from the US, Russa, Japan and Canada. The Russians flies the crew up while the US brings supplies. Thats what the World can do, and it dose it without conflicts or wars. The problem are the politician..

@Einstein World peace has technically been achieved. No sovereign country I am aware of is currently at war with another sovereign country.

@@thefistofshadow7392 A whole lot of collaboration in science is done internationally. Especially physicists and mathematicians work together all the time, and there are Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Europeans and Americans all collaborating. Scientists don't really care about politics and nationalities, they are only interested in science.

I'm from Eastern Europe and I used to watch MiG 29s take off. I love those planes but I'm a HUGE fan of F-15s and F/A-18 Hornets.

@@atklm1 Depends on your definition of "peace". In the modern era the weapons are *economic warfare* and *blockades* . Nobody is foolish enough in the developed world to risk all-out war knowing all too well that can tank their own economy. Above all people are more and more against armed conflicts - especially since many have only made situations and locations in the world *worse* . "War" today is more and more cyber warfare where you slander another country or propagate for it or espionage on the net. Wall Street and greedy corporations are the real war instigators nowadays.

It looks good and thats about it. Mikoyan haven't made a decent aircraft in decades.

@@analcommando1124 I hope Mig 41 turns up decent or at least bring something new

The narrator makes it sound as the F-35 has not been delivered anywhere yet. This video must have been made several years back.

It flies amazing as well!

.

mig 29 is crappy shit brother,, itz always have technical issue,,, used poor quality products

It has the same look because it is the same plane with better avionics and some other stuff. Russians just like to call upgraded stuff with new names

@@dangerboy1111 That's why Mig 35s were made which eliminated most of the Problems with Mig 29s

That usually comes at a price. Heavier landing gear mean more weight and less performance. Same issue US Navy jets have. Not saying it isn't worth it, but...

Meet sweden

Heck, they can even remotely cover the intakes when taxiing to prevent debris from getting in.

@@icecold9511 During wartime runways ought to be damaged, and alternatives may be required.

The UK thought about this 40 years ago with the harrier, which could land anywhere :P

So pretty much like an F-18C vs an F-18F? Only in this case it actually fits in the same dimensions.

Even f35/f22 have rivets alike. But they go through a tedious process of covering them with putty on every single bold and rivet to make it smooth. The Russians can do that as well but their 1 remaining prototype didn't have that job done to it

The Tail Fins are still perpendicular and can end can be seen from a half-day away and shot down by the time it gets a quarter day from target!

Russia is still using shitty welding work on the "Stealth" Fighter and I say Stealth, while laughing out loud. Rivets and weld spots show up very very well on radar. Just saying. And having a great fighter does not mean that the piolt is great. Russia can only afford to have its piolts fly just 1 sortie a week. Lol. So how are the piolts well trained and great? Lol look at Russia right now trying to take over Ukraine air space. Russia is having a hard time lol. Russia thought they would control air apace within the first week. Here we are a month in. Lol and it's against Ukraine lmao

@@nexpro6118 We now know Russia's military is a semi-joke. My original comment was stating facts. The 35M IS a better evolved aircraft than the 29. The Fulcrum (regardless of variant) is not a stealth fighter.

Does this engine smoke like the old MiG 29s?

Its a magnifique aircraft interceptor attack and reconaissance

yes! i agree.. that girl that was average then later in life you meet her again and she is super hot!

Except shes 6.5 tons heavier... wing loading up but aerodynamics and engine thrust remains the same. Shes not as good on the dance floor as she used to be.

@@nickbreen287 and thats when vectored thrust comes in XD make that big girl dance like a ballerina

@@nickbreen287 Given the MiG-29s rather underwhelming fuel load it is not a surprise that they would sacrifice T/W ratio for extra fuel (besides, some of that fuel will be burnt while the 35 gets on station). One of the main (and also most obvious) upgrades to the MiG-29, the MiG-29SMT, is its fuel capacity. This is in-part due to the mission requirements for the VKS having changed along the way.

@@nickbreen287 That 6.5 tons filled up all the right places.

1. Yep, Paine in Everett! IMO, best annual airshow in the NW. Saw the Blackbird there in the 80s. Because of procrastination I missed the fly-out with over-the-field passes the next day, remembering that while still driving there saw only its final departure. 2. Wonder what Boeing is making now in the old 747 plant?

Bila pulak Malaysia nak beli Mig-35? Nanti hilang lagi enjin..

@@yan2503 x jadi..hari tu ura² nk beli.

I give him props for not using a robot voice. I'd rather hear a human with an accent than a robot.

After the F-14 of course!!

Fulcrum. It sounds gorgeous... Like there's a thick brunette on your 6 doing her lipstick

@edward Curl They are beautiful and they win dogfights at same time.

@@enricodallerice2624 I prefer Raptor

It definitely is a Great Air Show Jet

/5مقاتلات جوا وتغط والمصانع له دور قرب المركز* اخذت الأهداف القذرة ودمر

Mig 35 is one of the best jets because:" The price is too good". There is no way, that the french aircraft that cost too much can compete with two Mig 35-not possible. The biggest down fall for the Rafael is that it is too expensive and you can buy two Mig 35 which will easily out do a Rafael no matter how good it is. Not only that , it is easy to repair, cheap to repair, easy to operate and also cheap to buy and can fight off or even down a Rafael. Even J17 can also down a Rafael. Thus the Indian wanted a plane but got the worse deal possible. That just wanted a change and got robbed by the french ha ha. None the less RAFAEL is not a bad deal but compare to Mig 35 it is...

@Uncle Joe yet those forces either don't have the money, so they buy used mig29s. or chose the f16/f18s or Gripens. that's what hampered the sales of these jet. not to forget the maintenance cost is higher than their single engine rivals (f16, gripen)

Only thing wrong with F-16 is that F-15 exists. Mig's offering is more affordable option to Suhoi's Flankers. Why acquire unnecessary and excessive capability when there are cheaper alternatives that allow you to get more airframes and maintain more flight hours for the budget available? Often cheaper and more numerous jet is able to fulfill it's task better than fewer, better jets.

@@thelittlestmig3394 You might want to check your prices, the Mig35 and SU35 are fairly close together. People like to quote the Mig35 base model price but if they are optioned the same, they are pretty close. Oh, my original post, that was a quote from a Russian defense official that I stole.

Actually Sukhoi is more for Russians and Mig are more for export.

Su 27-35 family is designed for long range and these are significantly larger planes with max take off weight around 34 tons (!). MiG 29-35 family is designed for frontal aviation and shorter ranges. Smaller and lighter planes. And other thing is, that it is not good idea to rely only on one producer of fighter planes when you are such a large and powrful country like Russia.

The Mig-29 when introduced, it stunned and even unnerved American analysts.

Mikoyan Mig-29 is like a dancing queen in the sky!

@@johnadamski9913 usa military in ft hood texas concentration camps is torturing Orthodox Christians refugees

@@johnadamski9913 it was overated, it was a good plane but the sukhoi 27 was the real stunner nevertheless the su 27 it was ignored by western analysts because the tradition was that the mig would go out to meet western jets in aerial combat and the sukhoi would stay home

Is it as capable as advertised?? What about the cost maintenance n flight cost, not counting availability of spares, I believe the Mig 35 is built robust as most Russian planes and equipments, not as super sensitive as the US products, my 5 ¢ worth of opinion ( use to be 2¢, but due to inflation, got no choice), heeee3

Su-30SM looks better than the single seat Su-27 family designs, imo. I also think twin seat Super Hornets look better than single.

100% agree with you...Not many jets can make the transition to 2 seats and still keep the lines that made them beautiful...I especially like the T-38...

The MIG-35 is a two seat jet. Or the second seat can be taken out and a fuel tank be placed in for longer ranges. At least, this is the case for the export versions that have been shown off.

F-101 voodoo

Agreed. F5Es are sexy aircrafts. A shame Northrop didn't have the guts to aggressively market these in Asia and South America.

Я как русский скажу - пусть наши истребители никогда не встретятся в бою!

@@stranics27 Hopefully our planes can meet as allies one day. 🇺🇸 🇷🇺

@@butterballin3686 👍🤝😊

As indonesia AF procurement of 11 SU-35 got problem because US is imposing CAATSA to indonesian govt

Definitivamente man

@Octavius Aurelius ??

@Octavius Aurelius are you sick man? Please go to nearest doctor

That looks like a MiG 1.44 concept and has the same cockpit design

Sort of, the Super Hornet is actually bigger than the Hornet, but I guess it's a similar kind of thing...

Perhaps

@Uncle Joe ......Amen! The F-35 is way overpriced!

@@edcox1630 then why does it have 3200 orders?

@Uncle Joe LOL were still waiting for Super Hercs

You gotta land somewhere in Siberia sometimes

Mig 29 was made for shitty runaways, flanker and the mig 35, not so much. The low mounted engines with short intakes of both designs inject a lot more dust than a conventional design, every particle that the front wheel throw up can enter the engine easier than on a f15/mig21/f35...etc Its great for high angle of attack, because retain pressure, but sucks for landing, i believe both jets have a grill or something to fix the issue.

@@polentusmax6100 Migs have bypass doors so when landing the main intake closes which has grills and rest of the air is sucked from the top of the LERX, in Sukhois there is a specially large mesh grill which closes the intake when landing. Also, both planes have special FOD deflectors on the nose gear which does not allow very large rocks to bounce off into the intakes.

@@hp2084 both grill and mesh cant deflect all small dust that enter those engines, so they are not good or suitable for a unprepared airfield or higway. Mig 29 have intake above the wing, that is what you need for a shitty road. Mig 21, for example, have a long intake, so the dust from the front wheel dont enter the engine. Flanker always had that grill and was not supose to land on a shitty runaway because it have range to not need that.

well russia has alot of wilderness landing strips becouse most of russia is just forrests, fields and show .... kilometers away from civilization

Funny thing is, Malaysia was seriously considering Rafale instead. It was only political turmoil that stopped Malaysia from getting Rafale.

@@izzad777 actually the Rafale case is similar to this one.. lots of political lobbying in the government, while in fact all RMAF wanted since 2009 was the Super Hornet. now that Hornets get AESA upgrades, there is no need to buy new Super Hornets, so they are now more interested in second hand Kuwaiti legacy Hornets which will be replaced by Super Hornets soon.

I think they were pissed because they realized that Russia had simply used Old airframes and tried to sell them as New. It was a really embarrassing situation for them.

@@northernchaotic7196 Russians tried the same in Syria. These were ... well, unused airframes, just never put together and flown and manufactured long time ago.

@@mimimimeow SuperHornet bl. III though would be... well... quite perspective nation.

It's a dud. Even the Russian air force thinks so with the lack of orders. What was promised and what was delivered is a massive gap. No AESA rader, no thrust vectoring control etc

Bro its an actual shit box...

its in bad spot against western jets from the 90's

This is engineered to be the best.

Mig35 je vrhunski avion , zapadni avioni preskupi a los kvalitet

Except the SU-35

J35 draken, blackbird, vampire or viggen

Well... MiG-35 is better than original variants, but got bit.... buffier. Fluffier. Not exactly obese like F-35 in comparision to F-16 but definitely chubby.

su35 is better looking imo

I think dassault rafale is the most beautiful

come to berlin /germany airshow all fighterjets there ,its about 30 euro entrance one day greets klaus from berlin

mom

Agreed, but if Black Widow had been picked over Raptor I think that is the sexiest aircraft created in a long while.

Great list! I`d add Mosquito and Hawker Tempest personally but great list nonetheless

As a non American and who grew up watching MIG 29 taking of near my house I must admit that F-14 Tomcat is the sexiet plane ever built.

No F15?

Not a bad list. I never gave the F-5 family much attention until this week, and began to see the beauty of them. The XL is also my favorite F-16. My favorite was the F-14 but now it is the JAS-39. Other favorites include the P-39, A-10, F-22, Su-57, Fw-190, and Me-262.

@@abc-eq9so Tomcat is nice. The thing I like best about it is the split engines. Just looks bad ass on an f

waiting they do a mini aircraft with the same Power! they can do!?🙁.. perhaps!🙁...

I had to pause the video in order to check the full specifications

The Royal Malaysian Air Force used to fly these Mig29s but it proved heavy on maintenance. A pilot flying them hated the smokey engines. Perhaps Mikoyan Bureau can retrofit their Migs with American F404 engines. They proved trouble-free in Malaysian service.

Nicolas Kloster Theoretically. But if you buy Russian fighter jets, you often do not have access to American and European equipment any more.

Issue with that is the 29 didn’t do very well in actual use. Kosvo, Iraq.

@@williamkillingsworth2619 MiG 29 was bad in kosovo because it wasnt maintained properly for years

Middle east !! Middle East is N1 in the world of purchasing weapons worth of billions

thx]

It would have been more baeatiful if it's black in colour

They've just acquired a plenty of mig-29 from Russia and Belarus several years ago. I don't think they will acquire the mig-35 for now

@@evanopos5 For now we wont, but it 2 to 3 years we will need new aircraft, and it would be either this or Su-27 or Su-35.

Serbia has an Air Force?

@@baklava6138 They do but it is very small and poorly maintained after NATO obliterated it in the 1999 war. They are slowly trying to build up tho

@@russiandispenser8482 That's not true. Serbia does not have the economic means or the need to buy Su-27 or 35. planes. By 2021 Serbia will have a total of 14 Mig 29 aircraft. 11 of SMT standard and 3 Mig 29 UB trainers. Vast majority of these aircraft were effectively purchased as a "free donation" from Russia & Belarus with Serbia only paying for the refurbishment and modernisation of said aircraft. Further more these Mig's that Serbia will have in it's inventory by 2021 are expected to last until 2030. So don't expect them to buy anymore modern interceptors soon unless they somehow experience an economic boom of epic proportions. Also Serbia is a small country and 11 Mig-29SMT fighters are enough to be used in an air policing role especially when backed up by half a dozen or so J-22 fighter jets. Realistically speaking if Serbia would look to beef up it's Air force fleet to accommodate their Mig 29s then they are better off at trying to purchase Chinese F-7 (Mig-21 variant) that have been produced until 2013 latest. It's based on an old model but comes with newish air-frame, near modern tech and ability to use sophisticated air to air weapons such as the magic.

No its not.

Russian jet name numbering was making me angry today when I was looking at how many jets have three different names for the same model. Although this has been done before in American jets, but to a much lesser extent, like the T-38/F-5/F-20 and F4D/F5D/F-6.

It needs structural overhaul but can sometimes be scrapped depending on the amount of work and availability of parts etc

Der Eurofighter ist bei 2500 h 😆

Polic politics