Ok drive on Test Loop 1 with FSD Supervised 12.4.3. One noticeable regression is the car didn’t slow properly for any of the 3 speed bumps. Vehicle also still pulls into suicide lane and signaled after it started moving out of the lane.
It was both safe and legal to use the "suicide lane". 3:55 See #2 below In California, a "suicide lane" is commonly referred to as a center left-turn lane. Generally used on roads without a dedicated left-turn lanes. The legal way to use a center left-turn lane in California includes the following: 1. **Turning Left**: Drivers can use the lane to make a left turn onto or off of the roadway. They should enter the lane only when it's safe and clear of oncoming traffic. 2. **Merging into Traffic**: Drivers turning left onto a busy road can use the center lane to wait for a gap in traffic. They should use this lane to merge safely into the flow of traffic. 3. **Limited Travel Distance**: Drivers should not travel more than 200 feet in the center lane before making a left turn or merging into traffic.
@@Discoducky73 they were definitely shallower speed bumps than i have here in northern california but i typically have a hard speed limit at 14mph for speed bumps
@@Discoducky73 _One was 21 MPH and the others 19. Those speeds seem fine for those type of bumps; No?_ FSD has *no* *idea* what type of speed bump it is, so ANY speed bump failure is a real problem.
Im I the only one waiting for a quick comment of the drive after”There you go, thats test loop 1 on 12.4.3”. Im not in the car, i”ve nerver used FSD. This is why i watch you guys.
If you subscribe to FSD, how can one know what FSD version you will get. When my free FSD expired, instead of disabling a software switch, it seemed to delete the software.
@@gsmith2520 nah software's still installed on your computer. the FSD model is downloaded with the software updates it's just sitting there in the background unused
I think Tesla will need to have specific location "notes" to compliment the AI to get it perfect. That way it can know how fast to take the speed bumps, optimal speed, and lanes to choose, etc. There was talk of Grok being integrated, and it may enable such user data as well as community data.
Yeah having a worldwide pool of LLM interpreted human fed data to tell the computer about special directions for edge cases and using a good consensus algorithm would definitely solve a lot of the problems we currently have. The other option is to feed it another few billion miles of training data *or* to add LiDAR but we know that wont happen. But the easiest way to have the fastest community input would of course to have grok integration and sync across all cars
Or maybe enable people to set their own speed bump speed preference. I dread being jostled around when I drive over them. At my age I have so few functional brain cells left, I can't afford to have my brain rattling around in my head like a.. i dunno, fill in the blank,.. every time I go over a speed bump. On a side note, I wish there was a way to mute the turn signal click-clack when the car is stopped and waiting to turn. My remaining brain cells have difficulty processing the mindless clickity clack.
That’s weird. It did the same 3 speed bumps flawlessly with 12.4.2 (although there was leading car and none here) but not this version. Maybe that was the “ER” type data that Elon was talking about and they diluted it with too much normal driving for more polish in 12.4.3.
Have you been watching the previous FSD reviews on this channel? Full speed over speed bumps doesn't happen all the time, but it happens sometimes. Unacceptable, after 4 years in beta.
It appears that it was slowing for the speedbump by going 19 mph as opposed to the 17 or so it usually does. It purposely was faster and slowed to 19 at one point. Think the AI model may be handling them differently or with a faster speed.
Your excuses are creative, but FSD did *NOT* slow down for the speed bump. If the bump was large and aggressive, that could damage the car. When will FSD get a clue ?
@@DerekDavis213 wasn't an excuse. It's literally based on what I've seen in the video and from previous behavior. If it didn't recognize the speed bump at all it most likely would've accelerated even faster. Not saying what it did was right or wrong but it appears that it was recognized in a way that was different from previous behavior as far as speed is concerned. The damage of the car is subjective. A cybertruck wouldn't be damaged going that speed as opposed to a 3 but it probably should be at 15-17 mph as it's done previously.
@@Gary_Walker90 We are not talking about a Cybertruck. Model 3 and Y are the most popular models, and if you drive 21 mph over a large and aggressive speed bump, the car could be damaged. It's just that simple.
So I guess we won't be seeing 12.4.2 going wide, obviously, if we're already onto 12.4.3. Speed bumps have always been tricky. Even on 12.3.6 which I've been stuck on for some time, it's hit and miss with the speed bumps. Seems to be consistently missing them now. Curious if you ever use the camera icon to report issues, or is that considered dated now? Are the chill/standard/assertive modes still basically useless? Or are those actually doing something, now?
Speed bumps are super easy for a human driver. First, a Yellow Sign announces speed bumps ahead. Then, huge white lettering on the road says Speed Bump Ahead. Then the speed bumps themselves are easily visible, and in a different color than the rest of the road. FSD has very limited situational awareness. After 4 years in beta, and with 8 cameras and AI, this is inexcusable .
@@DerekDavis213 Unfortunately, not all speed bumps follow the same protocols that you have laid out. Some have road markings, many have none at all. Some are painted, some are not and blend in with the road.
@@tesladura3085 But none of the *many* speed bump failures by FSD on RU-vid are the unmarked type that you are describing. You are making excuses for the simpleminded FSD software that have nothing to do with FSD reviews on RU-vid.
@@glen7567 Your experience doesn't change the fact that *many* FSD v12 reviews on RU-vid show the simpleminded software going full speed over speed bumps. And that can damage the car.
@@DerekDavis213 so you want the car to slam on its brakes as soon as it seesthe signs and drive slow for 100 feet. well that is nonsense. we have the signs too in DFW and the bumps are marked with white paint so you can see them. the car slows just as it gets to them the speeds up as it goes over them as it should. those in this video are hard for even my human eyes to see they are not properly marked with paint ad tn angle. those in the video are nonsense. and the second speed bumps were not marked at all. also the car slowed too. only going 18 mph. the car did its job the traffic peopld did not.
@@hllovell I have driven in the neighborhood in Northern California, a few miles from Tesla world headquarters. There are speed bumps around here, and they are not as you describe. Any human driver can easily avoid a speed bump. It doesn't matter if there are white stripes on there. White stripes are not required for a human driver . FSD has to adapt to the *real* *world* , not the other way around.
Yep my comments stand. They need to be marked better as those are for parking lots not roads. I personally hate them. What if I There is an emergency. Useless speed bumps. Delay in help anyway.
Previous versions had problems with speed bumps, going back 4 point releases. Mr. Locke reported the problem every time to Tesla, but that has had no effect.
The year of the car is irrelevant. The software and the cameras and GPS and detailed maps should handle speed bumps. But FSD is still not slowing down consistently, after *four* *years* *in* *beta* .
@@DerekDavis213 it's not irrelevant to me, I ask because I have a 2018 with FSD and I want to know how other new cars perform comparing to mine as I have different chip.
With these regressions and little improvement from version 12.3.6 to 12.4.3 (not 10x better as per Elie), I don't think FSD version 14.0 will become a candidate for robotaxi. 😟
@@gsmith2520 Elon always over promising. It's going to be a zig zag towards self driving. I would be shocked if 8/8 was the release of the robo taxi service. Probably just a hype train for the actual date they plan to start the service.
@@user-tm2mt5ms5o waymo doesn't go down a road where traffic is flowing in opposite direction! Also, always pulls over to the side when a cop signals the car. 😂😆 Waymo Fully autonomous. No person supervising the drive remotely. 😮
@@mrperson1324 unfortunately 8/8 is likely to be just some big promotion for his taxi vaporware. And unlike legacy automakers that deliver new models within 5 to 8 months, the new car models promoted by Elon on 8/8 will not be available for delivery until at least 18 months. 😟
Thanks for making the video. It would be nice if it were a more challenging drive. Better than doing a freeway drive but not much interesting to see. I guess FSD is getting so good, videos like this are becoming boring.
Impossible. Software and Ai is extremely difficult. Only long-term is it possible to weed out bugs. Plus the hardware is out of capacity to run a nn large enough to pick up on all the nuances of speed bumps.
@@rickkay9548 _the hardware is out of capacity to run a nn large enough to pick up on all the nuances of speed bumps_ Where did you hear that? Does that mean that FSD is doomed for most Tesla owners?
@@DerekDavis213 HW4 might be required indeed for a 5x increase in parameter count of the model(s) which it self might be required to pick up sufficient nuances to make fsd safer than a human driver
@@DerekDavis213 it means when they want the nn to do better in one domain, so have to make another one less performant (via node pruning, quantization and distillation). Shrinking other parts of the model makes room for more weights in another. HW 3 is definitely reaching its limits there.
Apparently you are doing same routes and know the weak and strong points of previous versions. You should mention them in each ride otherwise all your videos look the same
"Vehicle not slowing for speedbumps" ?!?!?! Speed bumps in areas I know are engineered so they are only an impedient if one is SPEEDING! If obeying the speed limit one needn't slow down to travers them. My experience comes mostly from driving in Virginia, North Carolina.and South Carolina. Are things so different on the left coast ans elsewhere? Does your particular car need new shock absorbers installed? What's the deal?
wheres my update. ima return my car if i don't get it soon. my car alarmed out today an strike me despite input on the wheel an taking over. i filmed it though an schedule service with tesla.
You are right. People that have been watching FSD for the last 4 months can see that the improvements are happening very slowly, and still lots of interventions. Such a disappointment .
