I am smart enough to not try to define God or put him in a box. If the universe could wink, that wink would cover over 3,000 years of our history. There is no scientific data that says God exists, however, there is also no scientific data that says God does not exist. It is a choice of faith, and always has and will be.
Yup. After I read your comment I went back and took a good look. If they'd make that into a poster, I'd frame it and hang it up in my joint. It's genuinely cool and thoughtful and has details that beg to be closely examined - like ALL good art, I suppose.
@CarolinaBaby _ please watch the video before you comment, my comment was a direct response to something said in the video. in fact, click the timestamp and it will come to light what i meant. i never said i believed in the matrix.
@@zhou_sei - Don't you just love how people comment without even watching the videos or understanding your comment? I gave you a thumbs up. Trump, COVID-19..... glitch doozies.
As a physics major twenty years ago, I remember how our physics lounge where we kids hung out had a poster paraphrasing Genesis but replacing "let there be light " with the Maxwell Equations.
Why the possibility of God should rely 100% on the Bible and the doctrine of Christianity and Catholic Church? There are +1000 different religions and philosophical point of view which also hold there is a God, and why should we limit such God to any religion? We know all religious texts have been written by men, evolved, and corrupted over time.
No religion owns God. Everyone should pursue their own journey to the almighty. Given enough time, any "prophecy" will come to pass especially on how cryptic they usually are and how they are interpreted. Remember, God is a God of love, and everything he does is from a loving perspective. I believe in Jesus because of what he said and did, not because I was told to or because my salvation depends on it. No religion has it right and usually has man made agendas they want to control people with using God to push it.
Is a modern god more believable as opposed to an ancient god? The most modern organized religion is Scientology and even 'old" religions ridicule it as if its their gods were any better.
Otos You should look up what the word "theory" means. You probably meant "hypothesis". The phrase "that's just a theory" is a giveaway for a poor argument.
There is no point in making general AI, or at least I believe. Just dismiss this if you want to. But, with technology we can get to the level of AI because the most amazing ability of AI is that it can recreate itself. We already do this, and we will take this to the extremes like augmenting our bodies to get rid of aging and increasing brain power exponentially.
Meanwhile, you depend on an AI to help you comment your thoughts...please stop pushing your own thoughts on to other entities that differ from you biologically, as the physical in your anatomy are negligible.
How true, in February 2021 my son had suicided, and he had used psychedelics to enhance his alien-god experience, but what gave him the false courage to do the deed was the bottle of whiskey he drank two nights before. This exploration of the god-alien thing ought not to be treated lightly.
Actually monks drank beer because it provided calories and nutrition. It was not meant as a sacrament. Beer was an ancient way to store grain. That's the fact. The joke is there's a sandwich in every glass. Beer is high in carbohydrates, that's why "light beer" was invented, so beer drinkers wouldn't turn into big fat tubs of lard. Doesn't seem to have been all that sucessful.
Give credit where credit is due, a huge explosion is a pretty badass start for something like the universe, so props to whatever creator is out there 👍
Moral of the story is: ignore the details, the philosophy of the Bible is simple and very useful. Something created the universe and we will likely never know what that was, humans have a purpose in relation to the Earth (custodians), the Earth has a purpose that likely has nothing to do with us, the universe has a purpose that likely has nothing to do with us, we need to exercise humility in order to accept our place in creation and if the creator turns out to be a conscious being we will have at least done a good job. Perhaps intelligence was a mistake because every other species on Earth plays it's role without even knowing it but we understand complex concepts like purpose and greater good but do nothing with it other than server ourselves :(
Saying words like "likely" and "probably" alongside an unfounded opinion isnt very scientific. If God exists, why assume a likelihood to his nature being unpersonal?
@@justindavis2711 Lol, definitely not a scientific explanation to be sure. In response to your question, omitting the necessity for the creator to be sentient, while still allowing for the possibility, fits better with many observed characteristics of the universe and also the core ideas from the Bible such as practice humility, accept that we will never know much detail about the creator, don't practice idolatry because that is worshiping the creation, make the Earth a paradise Etc.
Ha Mr.Tyson, Chuck Nice is absolutely correct. Belgian Catholic priests definitely drink beer. In my opinion Belgian beers are the best in the world. One of the most famous Belgian beer companies in America is CHIMAY brewed by Catholic Trappist monks. You bet your ass those priests are drinking amazing beer. :p
This actually is my personal belief, always has been. And what I believe about the bible is that the bible was written by humans FOR humans ABOUT humans. So how it talks about the earth being made for us, the visible sky being made for us and so on, it's true. But that doesn't mean god didn't also create other planets with lifeforms with THEIR version of the bible or the story of creation of the universe.
so this is actually true, the bible never mentions anything about space because the main theme around it is Jesus Christ. I ask these questions in my bible study and this is the main response. the only thing half wrong about what you said is it being written by humans. It is God's word transcribed through humans giving us what we NEED, not what we want. and to anyone thinking the bible has suffered the telephone effect, log off this video and start searching for things that prove the bible hasn't been tampered with or why it is real. spending so much time watching why religions is false and not the other side is robbing you of not only knowledge but your life. being blindly led by those who claim to know the most.
@@brianmi40 Its because bible is corrupted. Its not the same as the first one by Isa(jesus). As time goes, it gets changed and corrupted again and again... You can't deny that... There's too many error. Even the bible now said to cover your hair and dont eat pigs, but you guys still eat them. Bruh moment. Meanwhile Quran is pure because god itself said the quran will never change. What quran is now the same as 1400 years ago. If you interested, pls read the page about Quran mentioning Big Bang, night, day and planet with its own orbit, living things made by water, etc. www2.nau.edu/~gaud/bio301/content/iscrst.htm
Christians have the problem of taking the Bible far too literally. It shouldn't be taken lightly either, as we can learn from it and better our lives. But when you depend on it so much, to judge others instead of bettering yourself, you are missing the point. I believe the key to truth is seeing what works in both science AND religion. All of the sudden things become much clearer. However, our ego makes this damn near impossible for people on both sides. Let go of your pride and find the truth on its own terms people. That's what Tyson seems to have done
I agree with that, you have to find the truth in both science and religion and keep open mind. At end of day there's no scientific explanation to how existence was created, theres no what made the big bang, just that it happened, so we gotta keep an open mind to the idea of a creator
There's nothing good in the Bible that you can't come to naturally with a humanist world view. I love Neil, but he drives me crazy when he pumps the brakes on god.
The Bible is literal, yet the Bible is still a paradigm. This is not an either or situation, you an have both at the same time. Even there are people that say there are many layers of meaning. So in 6 days God Created the world and those days contain all of time and all of history. Hidden or otherwise.
lukus johnson Honestly I found that he was a pretty cool host. He seemed to grasp what Neil was telling him quite well despite having been Catholic at one point.
Having lived there for a time I can tell you there is no better beer in this world than Belgian abbey beer. Neither is there better cheese. Those monks just know their stuff man.
I think the problem had more to do with prohibition than external production. I don't know how it is now there, probably there's more variety of local brews, but the budweiser that comes to Europe is like making love in a canoe... it's fucking close to water. ;) Cheers
@@angadsingh9314 well, my point is more that "creationism," I though, dictates that it happened all at once. Not a prolonged process over billions of years. There is a huge gap between when Earth was "created" and when man was "created." I think there is a different name for it, but it escapes me right now.
I left when they started talking about the matrix. Remember this. 200 years ago there were scientist who were consider to be the most intelligent people in the world, they knew little of what we know now. We still know very little, and in 200 years from today, we will look back at this conversation and laugh at how little we know.
I've always posited that God could have created the universe from a completely different plane of existence. And this plane of existence wouldn't have to follow our physical laws of nature. You say matter can neither be created nor destroyed? What if an entity from a completely different plane entered ours, created the matter, and set off a cosmic explosion before leaving?
Yeah, but at that point we're just going into the unknown. Like I could say Thor struck a chip off his cosmic anvil and it became the core of the earth, which attracted a bunch of "dust" and water and voila.
Yeah but then how would that god be created, ur using the supernatural to explain things but then the question of what created the supernatural comes into play until it’s a never ending loop of supernatural stories, science is and will be a much more reliable explanation as we learn more
@@xefirez5697 If our creator comes from a higher dimension, then it wouldn't need to conform to our laws of physics. Existence on a higher plane could be something that our brains can't even comprehend. For example, a 2D living thing literally could not comprehend/process our three dimensional existence.
"If there's a higher power that did anything in the universe there's no reason that should be beyond science to determine that." He's apparently unfamiliar with Godel's Incompleteness Theorems.
If you interested, pls read the page about Quran mentioning Big Bang, night, day and planet with its own orbit, living things made by water, etc. www2.nau.edu/~gaud/bio301/content/iscrst.htm
There should be a full time school lesson every week in ALL schools on the planet called The Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He's by far 1 of the worlds best educators on Earth.
Cancer in a can! And it makes your myelin sheths Less effective Literally people chose to drink poison because drinking human shit, not purafied by alcohol killed them faster They took water from the river That was the fastest way to make feces go away They thought bad air made people sick, and water was purifying The holy water in our times we can test for how much human shit is in it There was a statue of Jesus that was leaking water and people drank that water and it was revealed there was a broken toilet pipe somewhere It's liquid death and kills humans, and they think they like it so it's even easier to get them to commit suacide with it through behaviors and craving And societal norms I don't touch caffeine if I crave it Discipline equals freedom
Why is it that scientists confuse ignorence with God? If anything God lives within intelligence. The fact that we can learn about the universe and how it works, as well as our part in it - only solidifies God's presence.
They compare god to ignorence because whenever humans cannot explain something (atleast in the past), they use god as an explanation, unaware that if they simply do more research or consider that in the future technology will be able to explain said phenomena, there wouldn't be a god necessary for the explanation. Thats where the comparison comes from, somebody who is ignorant will simply claim god as an explanation, others will instead actually search for the real explanation, and so far real scientific explanations always replace the old explanations that used god. Thats why he says that god is a slowly reducing pocket of ignorence.
If there is a god, my theory is that the universe was created as some sort of interactive,infinite channels type of deal. where he watches the places and characters from the various galaxies evolve and develop to a point of super intelligence
God is an idea/symbol for the fact that everything is one thing. Law of conservation of energy, nothing is created or destroyed, states merely change. We're a churning ocean of this creative force, individual objects aren't truly stable. There is no you, it's all one. That's God or whatever
If you interested, pls read the page about Quran mentioning Big Bang, night, day and planet with its own orbit, living things made by water, etc. www2.nau.edu/~gaud/bio301/content/iscrst.htm
The "receding" God is not such a bad thing. Imagine that you are digging a well looking for water. Every time that you encounter a rock, you say to yourself, if I can only break through the rock I will get to water, but you don't. It doesn't mean the water (or oil) is not there, it just means you need to dig deeper. So if we find out an event horizon beyond the big bang, and not find God, it just means that we broke though a rock, but we need to continue digging. It does not take away anything from the characteristics of God, nor does it reduce His function.
So if I hire you to work (hard work) and tell you to do it. That I have to go away for a time; but I'll be back to pay you and after say 30 some years you're still working & have had no contact with me. What can you conclude? 1. I'm dead 2. you've been tricked 3. I don't own the business you've been working so hard on... How long before you realize it was a big bunch of... And how could I exspect you to not only keep going but also get others to work with you with no pay?! Oh ya... and if you stop and I come back I will have you tourcherd! Give me a break!
@@ADEehrh However, if you do have contact with me and even keep your end of the bargain (even if it's from a distance), then why would I stop working for you. This is what it's like to be a Christian. God has not left me without contact. I live life with Him every day.
@@ADEehrh But you ARE getting paid. The Sun comes up, rain falls down, crops grow, food is on the table. Weather is nice, or bearable, but always livable. We dont get hit by asteroids, gamma rays, etc.. This all means that the system is working and we are getting paid. So yes, 30 years of 30,000 years. We keep doing what we should do.
I agree with Neil's line of thought; however it's important to understand the physical boundaries beyond which science cannot experimentally explore. For example, the energy required to explore the Planckian scale is high and concentrated enough to cause a singularity, shrouding what we are trying to observe.
its not human observation that effects the outcome. its observation in general. for us to observe subatomic particles we have to shoot photons at them, which in turn collapses the wave function into a single particle. if a machine measured it instead of a human, you would have the same outcome.
degrasse Tyson is the best. My science is lacking yet I always enjoy his talks. Tyson is the first I’ve heard to say that god could be just an E.T. I’ve joked about this for 40 years.
"My science is lacking yet I always enjoy his talks." That's EXACTLY why NDT is doing his job as a scientist and educator. He's engaging those who don't hold a degree or big understanding of these topics.
"God of the Gaps" and NEWTON: Remember, MANY scientists put God into their works, at least peripherally, just so Religion wouldn't figuratively crucify them as it did Galileo.
Galileo neither spoke against the existence of God nor he denied God as the creator till the end of his life. He was a faithful Catholic and his two daughters were nuns.
Agnostic here. Don’t really understand why - and I wish the interviewer brought it up - something that became explainable by a scientific method can’t still be attributed to the divine?
Cuz god only exist in things that we don't understand. In ancient times gods rules over the nature, they give sense to femine, catastrophes, rain, etc. Then, when humanity adquire understansing of this topics, they get that they are normal process that have an empiric explanation, furthermore, god is no longer needed to fill the space in our ignorance
Jim Essary Nothing to conclude here, its a simple fact that there is no god or gods. Such a beeing coud´nt exist because it would break natural laws. Pure logic. There are about 5000 other reasons, for example that all religious people are as stupid as 100 meters of rope.
What are these natural laws and pure logic that you speak of? It's a simple fact, is a statement lacking any type of evidence. Not sure about the other 5,000 reasons since you didn't elaborate, which is kind of a weak argument. Again, not sure what you mean about the stupidity of 100 meters of rope? I know what I believe and would be more than willing to discuss the matter, as long as we can keep it respectful. Back to you.
@@jimessary3192 I dont care in what asshole you believe, because all gods are assholes. You gave yourself another one of the 5000 reasons: "a statement lacking any type of evidence". Thats what your claim is. You "believe" and nothing more. Thats no evidence for anything other than you stupidity.
"If there's a higher power that did anything in the universe, there's no reason that should be beyond the ability of science to determine that." Shallow little science guy! To create the universe, God cannot be a part of it. He must be before it, and outside of it, and above it in power.
Basil Peterson Not even worth saying. On a long enough time scale, EVERYTHING IS. Every potential form that matter can or will take will suffer the same end. So what's your point?
He literally just spews out information that other men have spent their life work on. Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Tycho, and Newton.... Those who study the stars have God for a teacher.” -Tycho Brahe “I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” -Galileo “It seems probable to me that God, in the beginning, formed matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles…” -Newton “I wanted to become a theologian; for a long time I was unhappy. Now, behold, God is praised by my work even in astronomy.” Kepler
Those people couldn't conceive of a world without God, in many corners of the world it would have gotten you executed or at best ostracized. They also were beholden to Kings who were the head of their churches. Them being pro-God is about as surprising as some internet troll talking about a sky god fairy.
Since the universe expanded wouldn’t that mean the centre of the universe is the begging of the universe 🤔, so shouldn’t the inflammatory theory model look more like a sphere? Just asking
@@CE77777 Hi Aj, not at all...I can completely understand where the poster is coming from and agree with them that in my opinion, it should be more sphere shaped...nothing more, nothing less, no sarcasm was intended and apologies if it came across like that
David Thomas Na no worries and I appreciate it, I’m always looking to learn new things and since I’m not necessarily an expert I asked to see if there was a reason behind it, thanks for your opinion 🙏🏾
@@CE77777 no problem, as I say, i personally think you have a valid point and agree with you. I thought for many years that the big bang happened and then it expanded out in one direction as per the diagram...was only relatively recently that I was corrected to learn that it expanded out in every direction, left, right, up down etc...not just one direction.
Regarding this God in the gaps concept...as a scientist myself, in particular a biologist, I find it ridiculous that they believe that any new scientific explanation does away with the existence of God. Why not instead acknowledged that if there is a God, he would be wise enough to design a complex, self-sustaining system that has its own natural laws and order to it, and that what we are discovering are just the laws that He has established?
@@tsekesydneymakola5420 My apologies. I see that people use that term in different ways. I only meant the derogatory way in which I has been used to deem how "religious" individuals use God to explain the unknown instead of addressing Him being present throughout science. Thanks for pointing that out.
He's actually stated several times hes not an atheist but rather an agnostic what I really like about Neil is he is a lot more open minded than many scientists and he acknowledges that he may not have all the facts
@@BrianSmith-jx7td he specifically stated that he just has a problem with the linguistics and the presupposed ideas that get tagged onto the word “atheist”. But he has been clear about not believing in any of the religions that exist, and doesn’t believe there’s a deity that interacts, hears prayer etc. That’s an atheist. The word atheist literally means person who disbelieves or lacks a belief in a god. If Neil lacks belief in any of those gods he’s an atheist, it’s just the word has such a negative stereotype because of Christian cult brainwashed sheep that it hurts their feelings and he recognizes that in order to appeal to as many people as possible being an atheist probably isn’t good optics. And his goal is to spread knowledge and science so he’s willing to be vague on his religious beliefs in order to complete his mission.
- [x] 021.030 - [ ] Sahih International: Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe? 51 ,047 Sahih international: and the heaven we constructed with strength ,and indeed we are [its ]expander . 21 ,104 Sahih international: The day when we will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written]shit for the record , as we began the first creation ,we will repeat it [that’s a]promise binding upon us ,indeed ,we will do it .
Why does it have to be Jesus and the Bible? Clearly there are many religions around the world that are much much older than Christianity and all of em have their own gods. So maybe we have to look at these other religions' books and scriptures too.
Because those other religions didn't have bigger armies and go on crusades to force people to believe in a new religion like christianity did, or at least not on as large of a scale. Christianity's dominance is based solely on it's history of war. They happened to win and spread the most, so now it's the most popular.
2:33 there was a religious brother at a school in Haiti, he used to make his own beer...so I was told, haha...beer, not wine...from some leaves or something, I don't know how beer is made...I mean, not a priest, haha, but close enough...
(Genesis 1:1) In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (John 1:1) In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. BIBLE(KING JAMES VERSION).
@@Midnight_Rider96 even though the chronological order is way off lol. Earth was not first, it came about 10 billion years later, The sun and the earth formed at relatively close time frames if not the sun was sooner, yet god didn't create the sun until the fourth day? And somehow vegetation came before the sun. That is drastically off.
@@JeramyRG that's not necessarily how it should be interpreted. Heavens and earth would commonly be known as simply space and matter generally in ancient cultures. Hugh Ross argues that it's a phenomenological narrative, meaning that it describes how an observer (the spirit of God) would see the events unfolding from the surface of the earth (hovering over the waters in verse 2). It's from this perspective that changes in the earth's structure and atmosphere would be seen, first allowing light through and then the skies would clear up after some changes to allow the sources of light to be seen.
Trashmen (19:63) Do ye not know about the Bird? I say unto ye, the Bird is the Word. So say us all, the Bird is the Word. Baba Baba Um Maow Maow, Amen.
There is no reason why people who understand science and people who adhere to religion can't get along. The arguments and insults are typically slung by those who understand neither.
It’s possible we were designed by a god but what I don’t believe is the worlds religions where god only cares about those who blindly follow the sheep master also if god did create our universe then why would he only care about earth so much to the fact everyone is punished if they step out of line in a way no one should ever experience.
Dont fall for the heaven an hell bullshit, its made up to deter possible believers. If after knowing God you refuse hes love, what else can be done . You will simply die just as you would if there was no God. Only a numb nuts is going to refuse eternal youth in paradise
أَوَلَمْ يَرَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقًا فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا ۖ وَجَعَلْنَا مِنَ الْمَاءِ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ حَيٍّ ۖ أَفَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? Holy Quran Chapter 21 Verse 30
Electric Momentum7, nothing else? Just no coincidence? Could you back up your argument with some facts or is it just like you made it up to sound intellectual? I think its quite the opposite: if the multiverse theory is true then everything possible is happening in some parallel universe and being in a universe where you exist and are able to make the statement "it is no coincidence" is just a fucking coincidence
Michele Fio "trying to sound intellectual"?? What? I stated my opinion you fkn ape,it's what I believe, if you disagree then go fk yourself and move along don't lecture my opinion as tho you're better than me.
Electric Momentum7, I meant to say you try to sound like a philosopher or something, I am not English so don't get upset on my mistakes and try to understand what I'm trying to say. You just said what you believe without giving any reason, so I pointed out that your belief has no argument for its support and that it is stupid because science suggests the opposite of what you said. Seems like you got stuck on elementary science class moron.
Great chemistry between these two guys. I think NdGT should elaborate on his assertion that a god's intervention could be detected scientifically. I would think that by definition such an intervention would be in contravention of natural laws, but scientists would not assume that, and search in vain for natural causes.
Seems like saying God of the gaps ,is a little lame . I think God of the Casms, would be more accurate. Even though our accomplishments ,often leave me in awe, we are so arrogant, to truly be so ignorant.
rick created a universe to power his ship. so us being created by a nerd alien in his parents basement (sorry for making fun of you master), is a very possible thing.
Yes in genisis the creation and a lot of examples of the formation of earth 🌎 the sun ☀️ and moon the stars 🌝 the supreme lord powerful shiva the sun el sol everything revolves around the sun even like one of my favorite rock bands leaders he believes in metratron he’s is all powerful the cow is sacred black elk believed in wakan takan the creator of the heavens and earth there is “god” the almighty powerful one ☝️ Zeus of Athens and say that god is a concept by which we measure 📐 our pain.
I understand that he's american and he sees mostly american ways of thinking but i am italian. in catholic confession the old testament is not a dogma, it is not something you have to believe in for you to be called catholic. rather it is something they strongly advise you NOT to believe in, at least the genesis. Science vs religion is not a thing here, at least if you ask to well educated and open minded people ( there are ofc fools here to0 )
It is the same with Catholics in America as well. Protestants, particularly the more evangelical denominations, tend to be more dogmatic. I am neither so I don't have a dog in the fight, but that is what I have noticed in my own experience.
I was raised Catholic. That is true now, but it was considered literal until the 20th century by the church. This is the ever decreasing god of the gaps argument.
@@alexkilgour1328 well, we live in 2020, am i right? we can't keep reproaching matters of hundreds of years ago. If the people are inteligent, christianity moves on, just like science
@@luca12957 that is the god of the gaps argument. "Here is my holy book, everything in it is the literal word of god" then, as knowledge increases and ethical views change, various things in the texts become "we don't take that literally, it is just poetry", until virtually none of your holy book it literal. Science advances, religion surrenders territory once their hold has become untenable.
@@alexkilgour1328 i don't know what have been your experience, but i don't follow religion for it to explain me how physical things work. if people look at the bible to know how the universe works it's they problem. we catholic, at least in europe, don't even look at the old testament that much, we only look at it through the reading key which is christ, all the science related things you are talking about in the bible mean nothing to me.
@@YAWTon its exist but , we are not able to see it , because our eyes havent have that dight power but we seen him sign in universe earth and every where
"If there is a higher power that did anything in the universe there is no reason why it should be beyond the ability of science to determine..." And yet science has not been able to determine how many galaxies there are and how many planets are in the universe... Please let us all be humble enough to know that science just like religion is on a journey of discovery. Science does not have all the answers to the human questions and so is religion. The fact that we do not see something does not mean it does not exist. Let us humbly keep probing without making funny conclusions as if we know it all. There were times when science did not know what was on Mars...even now science is still probing. Neil my brother, please check that statement you made, I guess you might want to think it through..love you all.❤
Religion claims to have all the answers already, no matter how often those claims and assumptions have been proven wrong by our modern scientific observations. Science is a process that continually strives to ask questions and understand the universe. It is constantly improving on it’s understanding and has a self correcting mechanism embedded in the process. Religion has none of that, and faith unfortunately for believers, has and will continue to come up with a wide variety of contradictory and antithetical positions.
@@amenra13Good sharing.👍 I will doubt any religion or science that claims to have ALL the answers to Life. At best we are all "Seekers" and "Probers". I need to remind myself of that. Thanks.
Fr. Andrew Quarshie - ... but religions do claim to have all the answers. Something good happens because “you love and obey god and he has rewarded you.” Something bad happens and “it’s part of god’s plan, you have been disobedient to god’s wishes and who are you to question god’s plan.” Science never claims to have all the answers; only religions claim absolute certainty. You are using a false equivalence fallacy.
@@amenra13 If I speak for my faith or religion, I would say we must not claim to have ALL answers to Life, it will be funny to have such a claim. In my faith good things do not only happen to good people or those who love God. Good things can happen to anyone even if they don't believe in God. Bad things can happen to anyone; however, when things happen we use our faith to find meaning, harmony and peace to life's events.
Degrasse doesn’t make good points when it comes to religion and he’s sloppy in what he says. The Bible does not say the earth is flat. Nor that everything revolves around the earth. He tagged those right after mentioning Genesis as if it’s the same thing. As for God being a receding pocket of ignorance, incorrect. Because no matter what you discover as being the cause, you don’t ever truly discover the reason. It just leads to more questions. Man. I could go on and on about this. Bottom line, stick with science. Stop making straw man comments about areas outside your expertise.
If you had shown same amount of skepticism for bible and religion you wouldn’t be believing those anyway .. just like NDT needs to stick to just science you probably need to just stick to bible and stop commenting on these Big Bang stuff which obliviously is written in bible !! And bible explains very beautifully about matter , energy universe
This is why atheists have become the trolls of the online world. Anger. Ad hominems. Straw men. Mockery. I have to talk to ten of you guys just to get to one who is able to have a discussion that doesn’t involve these things.
Scott Newell i see more religious fanatics trolling the internet altogether, more than anyone else. was your original comment not some troll-baity shit u pulled out your ass in an attempt to keep your own inner delusion afloat?
Here is my rough draft of not Super-positioning 0○and●1 Simultaneously but Superior Positioning -1○|○0●|1● Simultaneously Dimensional -1 i Singularity Genesis Fractal Particle Theory D-1iSGF Particle is able to Program itself but never the same result because the particle structure always changes through it's own awareness, By splitting itself into 2 using [ i,i ]. This -1 Particle is a dimension itself, containing information of self for Existence to be. Explained below will show by awareness of self to see what self [is] arises [ i ]Manifestation of Possibilities, like you in a Dream Observing you aka "awareness" or you can be you in your Dream aka "awakened". But in this case it happens simultaneously * variable v - vibration is a energy source that reaches point to of (~f) variable x - x is the enlightened number variable (~f)- wave frequency is a perfect harmonic numeric energy code to access the Void variable [i,i] - infinit/infinit loop variable d - dimension variable p - particle variable m - manifestation (-1) Particle⚫ reason is do to self being, because nothing else Interacts with the Particle Not even with itself, the equation of ( 0) -1p+0p= -1p or 0p+ -1p=-1p either will do. Then v(x)=(~f)see variables* When the Particle does de-fusion it become two Particles○/○●=●. -1dp(~f)/2dp(~f) =1dp(~f) because they are still one in the same❔ Almost like a Dream? Time is irrelevant Except within: Void is Dimensional [ i ] Zero [+-0md(~f)], the Infinite Possibility of Manifestations that decodes the information from the Particle , to bring upon reality. The second same Particle leaves the original Dimension, appearing in a time Manifestation of the Void. That's why the Void can never be filled. -1dp(~f)( +-0md(~f)) + 1mdp(~f) =1mdp(~f) 1st manifestations dimension Fractal Particle So -1 Dimension became 1 Manifestation Dimension in the void Particles know when they're being observed because they Observe themselves. So In combination of -1d and -+0d/1mdp you get: (-1dp(~f)+2mdp(~f))1mdp(~f) (+-0md(~f)) +1mdp(~f)) 1mdp(~f) + 1mdp(~f)(1p(~f)) 1mdp(~f) + 1mdp(~f) = 2mdp(~f) Genesis? Singularity 2 Dimensional Manifestation Fractal Particle. Pure Thought Energy from the Particle that got decoded to information to Create Reality from Manifestation within the Void.. [-1dp(~f)(+-0md(~f))]+ 1mdp(~f)) + 2mdp(~f) 1mdp(~f) + [-+0mdp(~f)] + 1mdp(~f) + 2mdp(~f) = 3mdp(~f) Or 3rd Dimensional Manifestation Fractal Particle Results of Possibilities immeasurable in 3 Manifestations Dimensions do to unknown variables, origin D-1iSGF Eventually D-1iSGF goes back to -1dp(~f) or non-awareness And not -1dp(~f) , -+0md(~f), 1mdp(~f) then [ i,i ] All over, back to self-awareness. [i] Information can never fill, just recycled in the same order...Destruction and Chaos Creation and Order You can't Change what works. -1dp(~f), -+0md(~f), 1mdp(~f) this is known as Superior Positioning - this is the TAO_😀
