F*CK IT! 🤘🤘🤘🤘 Subscribe for more Videos: / budleewiser Don't forget to turn on the bell for notifications! 🔔 Thanks for watching and all the likes/comments!!!
Even if they were required to watch, they will probably learn how to rig the game without us noticing. They need to make their big gambling winnings...I mean paycheck the right way.
Except he includes some bullshit like the absolute kill shot on Lockett, helmet to helmet on a defenseless receiver. That’s not a bad call, get that fucking goon out of there
The no call on Storud was a great no call. Player landed on him, but he went for his arm. He landed on him, but the defender has to land somewhere. The roughing the passer has always been a joke.
@@sillyrascal3382 "defender has to land somewhere", sure. But it's roughing the passer when you land with your body weight on them. Not a great no call at all lol... It just shows how inconsistent the refs are. You can think it's a joke but that should have been called. Why do you think it's in this video?
Nah, the no call on Stroud was correct. That was literally just gravity and direction. THAT, should be the standard. Anything worse than that should be called, anything less should be fine. I think we just found the perfect sack to use as evidence to rewrite the rule honestly.
@@sillyrascal3382 Sorry, but it's a really dumb argument. If the way he's hitting the quarterback means that it's physically impossible for him to not land all his bodyweight on him, then the rule means that he can't hit him like that. If you watch any football game, you see quarterbacks get sacked or brought down, and it's just about always by defenders grabbing onto them and pulling them down to the ground. And yeah, compared to hitting them, it's hard to do, makes it easy for the quarterback to slip away, and it usually leaves at least one of the QB's arms free, which they can often use to throw the ball away and escape the sack, but that's the rule, and that's what guys do literally every single game.
I think that just like players, the refs should have press conferences with reporters asking questions behind why the refs did this stuff during their game. (to add on to being fined)
Refs completely ruining the game more and more each year. The fact that there’s so much more technology as well as a group of folks rewatching the plays in New York and they STILL get it wrong is mindblowing.
Like Jack Lambert said, they ought to put skirts on the QBs. Especially the ones that don't slide until they will have contact with a defender after "sliding".
Yep Pretty Soon Teams Won't Be Able To Tackle The QB Period Might As Well Let The QB Throw The Ball I Get It We Don't Want Players Hurt But Thats Football And Why There Getting Paid The Big Bucks
That lateral was easy to judge there were yardage markers and other markers where the QB threw it, and where the lateral ended up. If anything is backward, at worst it was lateral.
First of all there's no such thing as a lateral in football so not sure why people keep using that word. Second, the ball is thrown and touched on the exact same yard line. Not sure why people are confidently saying it's a backwards pass when you just can't tell.
@@aarongothmann7247What on earth are you smoking? You literally just said verbatim "the ball is thrown and caught on the same yard line" That is the exact definition of a backwards pass in the NFL rule book.
@@aarongothmann7247Did you just confidently say there's no such thing as a lateral in the NFL?! 😂😂 Not only are there laterals, there are forward laterals. How someone could be so incredibly wrong in the age of information is baffling.
Well, from my pov the ball left the QB's hand and was dropped at about the same line vertically speaking. Sure, the QB is standing at the white line, but the ball he's throwing leaves his hands from behind his stance so you can't judge the call on where his feet are but exactly where the ball leaves the hands. It went in a forward spinning arc and then died back down. Just my pov
@@alkavonstra5479 Pickett was standing in between the hash and solid white line. When he geared up to throw it, he was closer to the hash marker. To me, that looked like a backwards pass. Should have gone in Green Bay's favor. I don't care for either team, so I have no emotional stock to even try justifying otherwise.
The officiating is so inconsistent its ridiculous. Especially roughing the passer calls. Some quarterbacks get a call if you breathe too heavily near them, others get forearmed in the head and still don't get a flag.
Some will get steamrolled and trampled and squished… even pancaked and they don’t call it. Genuinely dirty hits have no calls. The reffing is entirely backwards in this league now
and this is why we should have never allowed online bookies like DraftKings or Bet MGM... they have too much influence and the NFL is abiding them so they don't pull their sponsorships... it translates to literal BILLIONS of dollars every time a game is played just in the NFL and it has become egregious at this point how bad the officiating has become to influence the outcome of games.
As a Steelers fan, that was definitely a lateral. Do I think the Steelers still would have won if not for that call? Maybe, who knows. But it definitely shifted the trajectory of the game quite a bit and GB fans have every right to be upset about it.
@@NevaG2190 I call it like I see it. If I want to complain about the Steelers getting screwed over by missed holds or phantom PI calls or whatever, I have to acknowledge when they're getting helped too. NFL officiating is such a joke.
you can sit there and watch that it is not backwards he is within the same hashmarks as the qb. the player made contact with the ball while being in line with the qb
I was watching the Hawks game when Forbes got ejected. I was SHOCKED!! The flag was fine, the penalty happened, but to get ejected over it? Nah, that’s bull.
Lol as a hawks fan I was like "OK, finally a good use of the roughness call, glad that one happened. Locket got messed up on that one." Then they threw 40 out and I was like "WAIT... NO... THATS NOT WHAT i MEANT!"
Referee call timestamp 0:32 Scott Novak 1:14 Adrian Hill 1:57 9:28 Craig Wrolstad 3:38 15:06 15:38 Alan Eck 4:27 13:37 Land Clark 5:09 Alex Kemp 6:02 Shawn Smith 6:35 Tra Blake 8:49 Brad Allen
Now we have to look at the question of whether or not they have something on the game or they have family members who have something on the game. Not too obvious this week but there have been other weeks that have had calls/non-calls that directly impacted the game outcome.
The problem is a lot of the week 10 calls were controversial not because of the refs, but because of the rulebooks. We're seeing more and more football plays being turned illegal. It's gonna be flag football eventually.
As a seahawks fan, I am thoroughly baffled as to why Forbes was ejected. Yes it was helmet to helmet so an obvious foul, but why in the hell did Forbes get disqualified?
"aw man, ya know, that's just like, a tough call, ya know?" What's a tough call is whose wallet you are screwing over in the betting circles that are becoming more and more apparent.
Dude one of these days these refs are going to make such a bad call that these players are gonna mess these refs up. Like I’m serious it’s getting that ridiculous. I’m more surprised we haven’t seen fans throw shit onto the field cause of these calls. Like it’s embarrassing to be a ref rn.
Worst refs I've ever seen in 30 years of watching the NFL. This is what you get when you allow sports betting. Penalties need to be reviewable, ALL PENALTIES!
Dude in that Minnesota game a Vikings player got their helmet pulled off by the Saint's and he got a penalty for hands to the face for getting his helmet ripped off
Probably because he either has to do his job or is told to throw flags when he doesn't want to. I don't firmly believe every ref is inherently corrupt, just forced to make some B.S. calls when they're told to and they'll get a raise or something.
11:43 Lol @ Hopkins' horrible OPI's against Dean and then going bonkers over wanting DPI flags, while Dean is just like, "Dang. Alright, let's keep going."
Unless holding his arms out in front of him is actual pushing off, that was DPI. The defender is blocking his path to the ball, which is textbook PI: It is pass interference by either team when any act by a player more than one yard beyond the line of scrimmage significantly hinders an eligible player’s opportunity to catch the ball. Pass interference can only occur when a forward pass is thrown from behind the line of scrimmage, regardless of whether the pass is legal or illegal, or whether it crosses the line.
@@PapaVanTwee5 And you don't think Hopkin's significantly hindered Dean's opportunity to catch the ball by pushing/yanking Dean to the ground once he realized that Dean had him beat on the route with eyes on the ball?
@@PapaVanTwee5 He was making a play on the ball, both times. That's typically one of the main determining factors for P.I. - Whether the defender is making a play on the ball or just trying to disrupt the play by guessing where the ball is at.
play it in .25, he moved b4 the ball was snapped, had he stayed still its easily on the D but he moved. it doesn't matter if the D guy moves, he can move all he wants but he never crossed the line untill the o line man moved
The inconsistencies are unbelievable. Driving people away from the game. The roughness calls are ridiculous. It’s football for goodness sake!! Football will be done if this keeps up! No one will keep watching this farce.
Even though I'm an Eagles fan, I was born and raised and still live in WI, the first clip made me sick. I work with a few dudes that straight up stopped watching football due to thinking its rigged (As far as the refs go, not players)
Any tackle that results in a popping sound of any magnitude and the offensive player rapidly hitting the ground it’s automatically now called at penalty. In a multi billion dollar business this is unacceptable for these types of plays not to be reviewed. These incorrect unnecessary roughness penalties many times result in drives being extended and points, which obviously directly impact the outcome of games. If the NFL wants to act above board and remove any doubt of being fixed, all of these unnecessary roughness penalties should be automatically reviewed.
Most of the unnecessary roughness calls make a good case for doing away with helmets in the NFL. No helmet, no helmet-to-helmet hits, and no leading with the head in general. I think it would be a much more athletic game and less of a brute force game.
Like I see it going on, and Im just wondering, what changed? Did refs just stop getting training? Im completely ignorant on their activities outside of games, but it just seems like they are so much worse than they even were a couple of years ago.
A lot. New people, new rules, betting. Even if we exclude the argument of rigging for bets, the new rules baby players into either have minutes of safety or getting flags. A lot of this weeks controversial calls weren't controversial...by the book at least. They were controversial cause they've been called for less. A lot of players nowadays are also very young and come from an era in NCAA where players would get ejected 2-3-4 times a game because the targeting rule was so unforgiving and could be easily manipulated. Offense never gets punished for intent with most of these calls, that's only defense. It's just one-sided sports-ball, and that's why most players, especially defensively, are supremely aggressive.
How are these guys considered "RULES EXPERTS" when they don't even know the rules?! If the NFL continues on this trajectory with these refs, it will start to push fans away from the game.
I guess it makes sense if you grew up in this era of football but I dont understand how people can still watch football. This isnt football anymore. Kudos to them I cant sit through 5 minutes of what used to be my favorite sport.
The concept of "unnecessary roughness" is clearly subjective, and presumes an acceptable level of roughness which appears difficult to quantify... why not just have players not wearing guards/helmets and other protective equipment...
As a Football fan seeing the refs make bad calls and it's worse than ever.. I haven't watched a game in weeks because of the refs killing the game and it's upsetting... Like I try to watch every game I can of every team. I haven't even watched a game since week 3
I know. Last year the reffing was just as bad and I really did not watch much football because of it. Dont ask why i have gotten back into it this year but that super bowl last year was truly heartbreaking. The nfl a few years ago was not this bad in terms of the refs. Something needs to be done
It’s the end times. The nfl is rigged for big bets, the POWERBALL is won 3 times on a row in California after delaying the number drawing, the political parties are visiting bunkers 5 times a month. Something big is happening and we can’t tell what it is yet.
How would 11:07 be a flag? I don’t see it at all and the receiver was pushing off. Even if there was something flag worthy Lawrence shouldn’t be rewarded for throwing an awful throw into triple coverage.
PI is stated as this: It is pass interference by either team when any act by a player more than one yard beyond the line of scrimmage significantly hinders an eligible player’s opportunity to catch the ball. Pass interference can only occur when a forward pass is thrown from behind the line of scrimmage, regardless of whether the pass is legal or illegal, or whether it crosses the line. OPI can be when the receiver pushes off to get separation, but in this case, I'm not even seeing pushing off because he extends his arms before contact. The defender does step in his way, severely hindering his opportunity to catch the ball, so I see this as DPI.
I will admit I hadn't followed football too closely in the past few years until now. Have the calls always been this bad? Seems like there is a compilation every single week that's more than 15 minutes long...
The Kirk no call is literally the most obvious lack of PI I’ve ever seen. And after not getting called for the most OBVIOUS PI in history… I’m surprised the Jags even attempted to argue 😂
