PewDiePie ATTACKED BY MEDIA? - Dude Soup Podcast  

For the love of all that is holy: listen to the whole podcast BEFORE you comment.

Okay, here is a hypothetical for you FunHaus. The Wallstreet Journal finds all the clips of you guys making sexist, racist and offensive comments on your shows (of which there are plenty). They write and article AND also email Rooster Teeth and RU-vid and complain how you are racists and misogynists. Suddenly you are under fire from other news outlets and more people are writing that RT should stop supporting you. You come back saying all the statement are jokes and should not be taken seriously and the answer the WSJ is "It can be jokes, but it normalizes racism and misogyny." What do you do? Fight against the claim and continue doing what you want to do creatively? Or become sanitized and not allowed to make any more "offensive jokes"?

His (Pewdiepie) videos were already a month old. Media and Disney didn't wake up one morning and thought "oh shit Pewdiepie's anti-semitic", they were pressured by WSJ. WSJ themselves admited that both companies only acted after the Journal had enquire them.

All these people shouting "hypocrite" that either 1) don't watch the whole video/only want to hear one side of it, or 2) don't take into the account that, in comedy, there is such a fine, ever-changing line based on so many things. People can make jokes in private that they can't make in public. They're not saying PewDiePie is making more offensive jokes than they do, but PewDiePie has a different line than Funhaus as determined by these other companies and media, and they're saying that in this case, the media and Disney have perceived that he crossed his line. So why don't you 1) watch the whole video, 2) try to see the whole picture rather than just saying "Funhaus, you make offensive jokes, you're hypocrites."

This podcast is going to be gold for the next comment response video.

Did literally anybody actually listen to the fucking podcast? I swear like people just commented ASSUMING the worst, when all these guys said was that they don't think hes an anti-Semite, and this was simply a shitty fucking joke that has obvious anti-Semitic connotations that could easily be interpreted as such. They almost immediately say this is a complex situation. Am I missing something??

i only imagine if Funhaus had 50 Millions subs..... the media would freak out everytime they released a video edit: spelling

What the fuck is going on? Did I watch a different video? They've been nothing but respectful towards PewDiePie, I don't know what people are so butt hurt about.

Lawrence doesn't think it's ill attempt of WSJ? He doesnt think or is not sure if they did it for personal gain? He says this stuff is happeneing all the time, it's just how it is? Didn't you know that the WSJ were knocking on PewDiePie's door after this whole thing exploded and got media coverage, and offered him their platform for a statement? Yeah let that sink in. PewDiePie has millions of viewers DAILY while the WSJ site has 250k viewers daily even tho their site is 40% their income source. And THEY offered HIM a platform to address this topic. Don't you get it? They did this whole thing ONLY for personal gain, to get clicks. They don't care that they are literally destroying jobs and the hard work of hundreds of people. And now imagine my surprise listening to Lawrence trying to defend the WSJ by not aknowledging WSJs ill attempt. It was attempt at character assassination, like PewDiePie said in his response vid. Like the media is doing with Trump now. I am shocked you don't see that.

Well, truth is, Pewdiepie was doing it to point out that the media takes everything out of context. And they did.

No Lawrence, its not enough context. Not in that case, and not in the other cases the journal mentioned. They even took a screenshot of him pointin his arm up, he could've been doing just anything. Take the context away like you are doing and boom, you have a hitler child. I dont even like pewdiepie but this was some weird as fuck attack on him. If he has enough viewers that he has to be careful about the jokes he makes, the wallstreet journal should be careful about the statements they publish for the same reason. But if you consider media to be fucked up manipulators like i do, they are clearly the bad guys here, because pewdie's video was just showing how with a very small little bit of money you can make someone say whatever you want... doesnt that tell you something? about the media? no? Cus thast what they do all the time... maybe thats why they didnt like pewdie's video?...

There is a thin line between jokes and insults - and that line is called 'intention'. Pewdiepies initial primary intention was for laughter, even if it was insensitive. That is much different than an initial primary intention of persecution, sprinkled with "humor". So in this particular case of the Pewds I think its been way overblown. He's just some silly Swed trying to be funny; who doesn't have the luxury of being born in a laughable and naturally odd country - like Canada

You literally say all the same jokes? Can you try to be any more hypocritical? I'm pretty sure you've made made dozens of videos ripping into women or other races

Dear Lawrence Not gonna lie, I don't know how to feel about this podcast. Lawrence, typically you do use 'outrage' humour within your videos, tame even though it might be, It could be say that PewDiePie does the same thing. Unlike him, you've clearly stated that you put on a 'persona' to get most of your jokes across from "Outrage Lawrence" & "Quintessential Gamer Lawrence" to "Laptop Lawrence" back in the Inside Gaming days. In all fairness I can bet my bottom dollar that he does the same, tuning the dial up a few notches so he can get his jokes across. But I digress, as I'm well aware Funhaus know, comedy is a art form. There are certain rules and standards people must follow in order to be "comedians", a certain level of respect and understanding is needed to play with the nuances of comedy and BECAUSE of this I think that one of it's greatest attributes is the fact that "Everything is on the table", there are no limits when It comes to art of comedy. It's a tool that can be used to entertain, inform and even humanise concepts and ideals that are way above most peoples levels of understanding. It's a way of creating a profound level of respect for topics of a taboo nature, because of the way comedians address them. Unfortunately for PewDiePie its clear that he doesn't have this ability as he states in his video (My Response)- "I would consider myself a *rookie* comedian". I'm surprised that going off the track record of Funhaus & Machinima/inside gaming videos that you took a fairly negative stance on this topic. Honestly I thought that you would be hitting this discussion with something of a more intellectual approach

The FunHaus cast is significantly more social justice warriors than I like. Lawrence grew up in the south, hates anything traditional, and believes in his own "self-enlightened" progressivism. I infinitely prefer gaming videos to podcasts that have this kind of idiotic bias.

Wtf Lawerence, you are drawing some ridiculous parallels and removing context even when you say context is important. You say "very direct anti-Semitic statements" but they are not, it was in the context of a joke. You are just taking out of context, I'm really pissed off. Also it seems like you guys didn't read or watch much, maybe Lawerence did, but then everyone else can't make a honest opinion because they aren't as informed as him and he obviously to the medias side of this. Regardless of "jokes" that pewdiepie made or whether you agree or disagree on how appropriate it was, the media is performing an absolute hit job.

Can I also add that it wasn't just pewdiepie working on his show, over 100 people were working on it so WSJ didn't just provide a mild inconvenience to him they made loads of people lose there jobs so they can get a few clicks on a shitty article, Lawrence used to ride articles so he'll never go against them

I have never disagreed more with Lawrence's stance on an issue. Quintessential gamer I don't know who you are anymore.

This is just infuriating to watch.

Pewds is just the perfect target; blonde haired, blue eyed, most popular youtuber making nazi jokes that aren't very funny. I didn't hear shit about Keemstars tyrades on the news.

pew die pie fanboys salty

You lot criticise video games and films but your biggest achievement is using clickbait titles to get clicks from tweens. Jesus wept.

I agree with what you guys said, but would like to point out a few things I think you may have missed: 1. After the "DEATH TO ALL JEWS" sign was revealed, the guys said and the video showed "subscribe to keemstar". I think that is of great importance and gives you the full context, esspecialy knowing keemstar's past and his and pewdiepie's relationship. 2. At 54:55, He did. In the "my response" video he stated how he understands the reason why maker cut him loose, and that's why he is concentrated on the media coverage side of things. 3. Maker studios also owns idddubz, and he is much more uncensored then pewdiepie, so why isn't he being under fire. This plys into the idea that the "media" (even though it's stupid to generalize, just like the "goverment". Literally milions of people work in it.) or let's say then WSJ had some reasons to target him. 4. On a side note, the video they showed has pewdiepie looking at hitler and nodding. In the sam video where he does that, he is making fun of how this can and could be edited out and just shown as anti-semetic and pro-Nazi...and it actually happened! 5. Whatch his new video "I KILL HITLER", and tell me it's not funny. Yes, all things subjective, but that is a well thought out video. (new edit) I might edit new arguements and opinions in here but won't change the existing. Would love to here thoughts form anyone, but especially you guys, gals and Benson.

Everyone in the comments talking about how hypocritical everyone was. Really, the only kinda hypocritical person was James when he kept referring to PewDiePies jokes as "shitty" and low effort when often times he (and FH in general) exploits the same low effort racism/sexism/shock jokes.

To James point, Lots of people found it funny. In fact, if we're speaking in general terms, looking at the comments of that video, the MAJORITY found it funny. People understood it was a joke and in the context of the video it was hysterical. Great podcast though :)

I'm pretty sure no one sitting there is against pewdiepie so I don't know what y'all are mad about

Does it make you guys worry about all of your racist, sexist and other bigoted humour? Because right now you're operating within a bubble of acceptance for that sort of behaviour, with your fans mostly being young teenage boys; they think that stuff is funny..... but has there been a conscious choice to shift your humour away from that? Because it was getting pretty rampant for a while, like 5th grade boys testing the boundaries... but I've also noticed you guys catching yourselves just before it gets too out of hand lately. And if it has been a conscious decision, is that because you feel its a danger to sponsorships/plans for furthering your brand in the future?

I found the video fucking hilarious by the way, if James said no one found it funny, how are you guys still in business

Lawrence, no matter the situation, you can never have 'enough' context.

Just like half way into the video after a long day, but I have to side with many of the comments on this one. Lawrence repeatedly harps on the "context" issue but so far takes each of Felix's statements out of context, seemingly in defense of The Journal. It seems the issue is that Lawrence falls on the side of "I didn't find this funny, so it's an anti-Semitic statement", which is a semi-valid argument, but seeing as comedy is entirely subjective, that's where his stance fails. In these weak points, James is somehow the voice of reason. The "double-down" argument is also flawed because of what they said at the very beginning of the podcast: He's a guy and his statements are a result of him finding the need to rephrase because his explanations aren't quite as precise as they are/being taken how he interprets them in his own mind. These arguments only work out of context which Felix has tackled numerous times (ironically, sometimes in the cited WSJ examples) and they perpetuate the stigma of RU-vidrs not being comedians and the double standard that legitimate comedians (also Funhaus) are somehow able to make such inflammatory statements in jest. Coming from Funhaus in particular, this as a whole is pretty ridiculous and worrying as a viewer. I'll weather as much of this floundering debate as I can and edit as these issues get resolved/more issues arise.

You guys are my favorite channel on youtube, but I don't understand how Lawrence can't see the hypocrisy in what he's saying. If Pewdiepie shouldn't be making those jokes, then Funhaus should end, because you guys go way farther.

I feel like all of funhaus should be on pewdiepies "side" if anything there jokes are very similar to him whether they are anti-Semitic, misogynistic etc, WSJ are slanderous arseholes who deserve all the hate they are getting, I'm not the biggest pewdiepie fan but I know a witch hunt when I see one, just watch H3H3 as well who explains it and if it makes it anymore credible he's a Jew

If WSJ writers lost their shit over Pewdiepie's potential or perceived racism, I wonder how they'd react to the old IG vids and a couple on this channel? Bruce, James, and Adam have all said something that border on racist in their content. Whoever wrote that article would be supremely triggered if they ever found FH/IG...

Lawrence virtue signaling hard in this video.

Lawrence "WSJ provides enough context in their journalism" Sonntag

i'm surprised they didn't do Rule 34 Pewdiepie, oh wait, nobody wants to see a Naked Nazi,

Richard Spencer is a horrible person, but violence isn't the answear for someone with bad ideas. one of the few times I've ever been put off by you guys. thank you for talking about semi serious stuff from time to time, you guys are a great part of my daily routine.

Is anyone really surprised these guys would side against Pewdiepie? They showed long ago they have a very strong SJW/Toxic Feminist worldview.

I can't wait for Lawrence to read these comments in the comments show and get pissed at everybody.

For Fucks Sake! For the people asking hypothetically, "What would you do if all this happened to you?" Stop it. Rooster Teeth is not Disney, the jokes Funhaus make are far more thought out and comically applied than that one particular joke Felix made and last but not least.....ROOOSTER TEEETH IS NOT DISNEEEEEY!!!!! The jokes made by Rooster Teeth (Bernie, Gus, all of AH, and more) are a million times worse than the jokes on Funhaus. Rooster Teeth wouldn't give two shits about what Wall Street Journal would have to say. Honestly, think people :[

I think pewds was trying to be edgy like idubez and it kinda blew up in his face

God forbid WSJ gets pointed to pretty much any of your videos.

I'm jewish and no jewish person that I've spoken to that watches Pewdiepie is offended by his Nazi jokes. They're jokes, some are funnier than others but they are still jokes. People who don't know what they are talking about just want to be offended about something. It's interesting that it's mostly non-jews that are calling him an anti-semite.

i think Lawrence forgot to mention that one of the main reasons pewds took this as an attack rather than just media coverage was the fact that he made a specific video on the fact that media ignores context for their own gain or agenda, and at the end of that video he showed a Hitler speech, which was supposed to represent how the mainstream media is nowadays. The media then released another "article" ONLY showing the Hitler speech from said video (and other videos) once again completely ignoring the context. Furthering the point of why pewds thought he was attacked, rather than just being neutrally covered in an article.

Any one else think Elyse triggered Lawrence in the ad read?

to what Elise said at like 14 minutes, he probably meant the video of him dressing up as a Nazi was the thing that was political since he was talking about RU-vid content cops (I forgot the real name)

FUnhaus and especially lawrence could you please also add more to the "death to all jews" content? Pewds also asked if they would say "subscribe to keemstar" so the "death to all jews" joke wasn't the only joke in that "order". Edit: Also that scared pewdiepie season 2 got cancelled because of this and it didn't just affect a pewds but all of the people working on it.

The only reason pewdiepie gets treated so differently (both negatively and positively) is because he's a solo act, he's just easier to vilify

J.K. "Peds is a fascist" Rowling is 'destroying' Piers Morgan? Okay, mate...

Lawrence should have taken a day off. Boy was he on edge.

Does no one see how if the WSJ never went to Disney/MakerStudios then they would have never severed ties with Pewdiepie? I firmly believe that Disney/Maker wouldn't care if that joke was in the video, because they know that it's not anti-semite at heart. (It's pretty easy to see when you don't take things out of context) It's only because the WSJ went to Disney/Maker with their ridiculous out-of-context accusations that they severed ties with Pewdiepie. Why does no one think about or at least acknowledge this possibility?

Pewdiepie's jokes were talking out of a context for most of the article when involving pictures, clips, and quotes. WSJ has been gunning for the kid's neck for quite sometime because his name has POWER. He should've doubled down on his personal statement tho. Lawrence, I love you bro, but you were mad hypocritical from time to time about jokes with or without context in this *bowl of Dude Soup* but you also made the fantastic point that he's under GODKING DISNEY CHRIST so the rules are different. The issue is quite complicated, and so are the arguments & summarization. I deeply appreciate the wide spectrum of viewpoints provided in this episode on the topic. #FuckWSJ

I appreciate your guys' ability to debate both sides of the argument

Why so many dislikes? I agree with what Laurence said. The joke Felix made was undoubtedly a joke, but just a tasteless one. Funhaus aren't being hypocrites, they deliver racist/edgy jokes much better than the ending to the controversial video Felix made and that's at least my opinion. If you guys don't like what Funhaus has to say on the issue and you think they are being hypocritical then either stop watching them or be sure to remind them of "their opinions" next time- or honestly , whenever they make a tasteless joke. You aren't going to stop watching them though because you need your Funhaus edgy humor fix, but just keep all this in mind before you get dislike happy.

The really funny thing is fiverr is an Israeli company.

I fucking hate all the people defending PewDiePie and ripping on Funhaus. All these actions by PewDiePie and Funhaus have the intentions of being JOKES, get that through your heads. True, some of these jokes, especially from Funhaus may go to far, but having someone as big as PewDiePie to post a video with "Anti-Semitic" content. I liked Jame's point of, if you're that much of a worldwide star (working with Disney) you should take the time to think about how something in your video might have gone too far especially for multi-million amounts of viewers. Now I wonder if any of you bashing Funhaus even watched the entire video. Just my view of the issue, but I'd love to hear everyone's opinion!

So first off, hello comment show and section. I'm getting a strong vibe that James and Elyse were the only ones to see every video put out from Pewdiepie and watched them all the way. They understand and clarify what was said or the certain situation that was being mentioned. However, our lovely dork Lawrence doesn't seem so informed. Or at least comes off like that. You mentioned the "hitler wasn't wrong" part of the video, but that wasn't from Pewds. That was another video he put in from someone else. I feel like he skimmed articles and some clips and got his info there. Also that "the image is enough context" line is gold. It's not enough context and here's an example why: Bruce himself in one gta video was making some rather crude jokes about women and their place. Now we can take that clip of Bruce saying that joke there, which we the audience know it's a joke because we watched the video, we post that with an article of Bruce's commentary about women. Behold a shit storm. Now according to Papa Lawrence, the image and what they gave was enough context. With that we can only assume "wow Bruce is a dick to girls." Because, that's what the context given is. We all know it's not though as we can out and actually look up evidence and do research. Btw being a dick because you're sick isn't okay dude. I mean c'mon at 34:24 the look on Adam and James' face says enough. End of comment. Too long for the show but still I felt like putting this out there.

My dream was to become a Funhaus first commenter, "first!" I would whisper to myself in my dreams... unfortunately I only became a successful entrepreneur.... my mother will never be proud now.

i found it fucking hilarious when pewdiepie makes racist,anti semitic,amd pushez the boundaries of what he can get away with he doesnt single out anyone in particular(jacksepticeye doesnt count) everyone just need to stop bekng so offended by people saying literally anything

Every time fucking time. People dont even listen to what they are saying, they just listen to a fragment of the narrative and make idiotic assumptions or comparisons. The Propositional fallacies are much real here in the comment section, where people try to act smart about comparisons and saying they are hypocrites when you take the things they do and say out the context.

Yeah it was totally funny when funhaus made fun of whites, blacks, asians but when pewdiepie made a joke about jews that wasn't cool, I get it now thanks funhaus

I made a succesfull childrens book series, and now every stupid thing i say will be supported by thousands of people - jk rowling

I know it's a persona in the gaming videos blah blah blah, but it always surprises me how eloquent, well structured and fair the conversation Lawrence puts out in dude soup is. Don't get me wrong I like everyone's input, but Lawrence stands out for me. Keep it up!

Lawrence was my favorite before this podcast.

I don't understand why they are pretending that this should be a huge deal and I like lawrence less and less with each leftist bullshit that comes out of his mouth. Its clear that lawrence is ok with punching so called nazis, why? cuz you say they are or because you don't agree with someone. I thought these guys were grounded in reality and it just sounds like they are tip toeing around lawrence and his regressive sjw bullshit. we all(as in normal human beings) thought it was funny what pewdiepie did and I don't even watch them but to see these guys I used to respect trying to backpeddle and act like they don't get the joke. Funhaus has said much more ignorant and revolting things yet at least they pretend to be higher than pewdiepie. It was just a hit piece, it's like they all are trying not to offend lawrence. I really thought lawrence was one of my favorite personalities until I heard him get so happy about richard spencer getting punched, I don't like spencer but it's clear if you agree with it your against freespeech and what being an american stands for.

First Ashley and now Lawrence, why are they so triggered over a joke?

You guys are missing some context on the "death to all jews" stunt as well, Pewdiepie got them to hold up the sign and say "subscribe to Keemstar". It is still undoubtedly a controversial joke but this adds a bit more depth to what would otherwise just be a tasteless reference as you said. It shows that the joke was a bit of satire in reference to the whole Keemstar racism scandal, making a sort of parody message that, out of context, would be seen as an antisemitic message on behalf of Keemstar. Ironically though, through the misconstruction of context it has been presented as evidence of Pewdiepie's own opinions.

i really don't understand why people are angry in the comments , me personally i agree with some of the things they said and a lot of other things i don't , this will never change the fact that Bruce have an awesome beard.

So PewDiePie's anti-semitic jokes are crude and tasteless and no one found them funny, but Funhaus' constant jokes about dead people are well thought out high brow humour? I love ya Funhaus, but sometimes you guys take what you do too seriously.

How are these guys in the comments freaking out, FunHaus even said they have a lot of parallels with Pewdiepie with pushing what's okay and not. Neither one of them are racist, they both are entertainers, the issue with Pewdiepie is he works with Disney, Funhaus is with Rooster Teeth. Rooster Teeth has never been for kids necessarily, Disney is for family and kids. In short, neither one are racist, it was a bad joke, that's it. Get over yourselves people in the comments. Edit: I don't necessarily mean Disney is for kids 100%, but they are much more clean and family oriented than other companies. That's all I meant.

James said at 32:44 that no one found the joke funny. That's actually not true. Quite the opposite. That video had way more than the double of his normal views even before WSJ made that article and the video got the same amount of dislikes any normal video he releases and the likes were more than the triple of his normal videos. It's not "no one" liked that joke. His fans love his humor and loved the video. He has done way more "offensive" stuff in the past and no one ever complained. It only started to get "hate" because of the WSJ article. And guess what. Even after the WSJ article you would think his video would get down voted like crazy. Guess again, it barely affected his video. It even gained more likes and popularity. Just because a few media outlets made articles saying that he was being anti-semitic it doesn't represent "most people". The only people that you know that got "offended" by the video were the people making those articles. You go see the comments and all you see is praise for PewDiePies work you probably will find 1 person in the 5000 comments that somewhat got offended because they were told to. The media DOES NOT represent everyone. The media represents themselves and themselves only. And when you James are saying that no one found that joke funny, you are assuming the people that wrote the article represents EVERYONE and that's when you know the media is controlling you guys. Don't you understand? The media is not asking you if you were offended. The media is telling you to be offended!

I don't get why people keep saying the title is click bait.... they talked about the issue they addressed?

I might be super triggered if they don't come down on the side of Felix on this. But then I am a total cretin.

The media took it all out of context.

The knowing looks shared by Adam and James really set the tone for the video for me.

they can't possibly take a dig at pewdiepie, when some of their content is ridiculous... "digging up chyna and having sex with her" for example. Pewdiepies video i thought was funny, it was shock humour, something they funhaus turn to a lot

Does Lawrence believe most of the shit he's saying?

FH has seemed really on edge with each other lately. And it makes me sad.

George also wrestled a little in the attitude era when he joined the oddities along with insane clown posse lol

"RoosterTeeth cuts ties with Lawrence Sonntag over misogynistic comments towards coworker during podcast."

Maybe pewdiepie did this all on purpose to revitalize his fan base...dun dun dunnnn!

I like James points on why Disney could be at fault for some of what just happened. In my opinion this is stupid, Pewdiepie has always had that "edgy" comedy which he states is amateur and is only targeted for the sole reason to bring in money. I don't agree with the joke he made, was tasteless especially in this political climate like Adam said. But you can't blame disney for having to leave Pewdiepie behind.

Oh boy there's a lot of salt here.

Lawerence seems to be in a constant downward spiral into the far left. When you say a picture is enough context to implicate someone as an anti-semite is pretty flimsy. Over all he seems like someone engrossed in his own bias and relies on other to challenge his ideas for him.

I think the reason i love this channel so much is because throughout the week I get to watch this crude humor that appeals to my sense of humor, but then once a week I get to see that the 17 year old goons I normally see are actually intelegent adults capable of thinking and forming both opinions and arguments about a wide range of topics. I just appreciate these podcasts because so often on youtube and television we see these characters people portray and we get the idea in our head that that character is actually them but with shows like these podcasts we can see another facet of some of my favorite charters, and it helps me come back to reality about the content I'm watching.

I feel like they didn't actually read the article that WSJ put out. Everything the the WSJ used in their article was presented with 0 context and was presented with an obvious bias against him.

Boy, this next Comments show should be good!

These guys throw shade whenever the chance comes up. Do I sense some workplace hostility?

I love how Adam is scrambling to do anything to break the tension in the air from 34:24 until 36:09. James has some pretty good crazy eye going on too when he knows the ship is going down, but the show must go on.

I want to say thank you for handling the topic of PewDiePie in the media in the manner that you did. There was legitimate conversation on this cast that pointed out MANY great points. Your candor, analogies, and understanding pointed out the exact reason that when I open RU-vid FunHouse is the first place I check for a freshly posted video. Keep up the good work guys... and gal.

36:34 is where they start talking about the Kramer "N-word" debacle. That's what everyone's here for right?

Sometimes Lawrence's arrogance can get under my skin. Love him most of the time, but as soon as he believes he's right about something, he pushes his ideas way too much. It's like he thinks he's the only one that can be logical about complex situations.

Poor Elyse in the background... WHERE ALL WOMAN BELONG

I feel like 90% of the people leaving comments saying Funhaus is being hypocritical just watched the first 10min of the show, got triggered and didn't actually listen to their arguments.

I absolutely love James in dude soup videos, he becomes a different person it's amazing to watch.

Fuck me James, if you own an office England it must be London right?

Just a quick off-topic comment. Good on you Lawrence. I could tell you were struggling through your sickness. Bravo for keeping up with the quality standard you guys set. Edit: Also I had the exact same disgusted face Adam had when Lawrence was quoting the group that loves gadget.

that's disappointing coming from you guys.

The weird thing to me are people who dislike the video for their opinions even though they each have slightly different takes on the situation, they just don't feel the need to shout or argue endlessly to make sure theirs is the dominant one.

59:42 Lawrence hits the nail on the head.