r/Murderedbywords | get on my level. 

surpassed, surpassedm and sur, passed. Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh Sigh

surpassed like no one gives two, no three, no 1,000348393090939 shoots about me.

sometimes if im writing an essay, the websites that aren't wikipedia either have info that i already have or have like 2 or 3 sentences of info, i dont want to keep scrolling and clicking on different websites just to get like 2 sentences

@@brid1889 If you're looking for something specific on a website you could always hit Ctrl F and start typing words from it.

@@brid1889 If you already have the information from Wikipedia, then it's better to list the other source *instead of* Wikipedia. You're not getting the other sources in addition to Wikipedia, you're getting the other sources because they are the sources of what Wikipedia says. Also you don't need to take literal sentences off these sources. Unless you have an extremely quotation-happy teacher, you can rephrase a lot in your own words and just refer to two or three different sources that say the same thing - more sources is generally understood to mean more trustworthy (as long as the separate sources didn't all take their own information from the same base source). I have the impression you're in high school, and believe me when I say we've all been in that position of trying to spend the minimum possible amount of time and effort to pass so you can go do something you actually want to do. But the thing is, going to different sources to get 2 or 3 sentences of new information you can use is pretty much what research is. My own theses in college tended to comprise 20 books where I'd been able to take maybe 30 lines of useful information from each one, with a lot of overlapping information between them, and that required me to actually physically go to a library and spend hours there. (My Bachelor's thesis was 80 pages long, just to give an idea of how useful that was, but you do have to add your own work and findings as well). The reason why your teachers are trying to make you learn this now is because you're going to need it later if you go to college - because you really don't want to be blindsided by the amount of work and effort you're expected to put into these kinds of things at that moment when you're already in college. College is hard enough when you actually know what you're in for. So I guess what I'm trying to say is, enjoy the fact that you can just scroll down Wikipedia and click on the websites listed there for now. It's more effort than just quoting and referencing Wikipedia itself, but it's going to get worse.

L

@@AlastairsWorldMNOP

Cope harder 💀

@@ptyxxyou ok?

@@ptyxxsays the coper

We still have massive ozone damaging emissions from farming, google 'fart tax' 😅 Also "In summer, ozone-depleted air moves over New Zealand from Antarctica." which I literally just learned.

you a fruit (this is a joke)

​@@thatbootlegninja 🍎

They look like middle schoolers cosplaying as adults

Also, they are British, in the Washington DC public transportation, and I'm no expert but that's basically the antithesis to all right-wing beliefs.

@@davidstomberg8737 Thanks. I was going to point out that "zero" was easy to comprehend, but since those are just kids on vacation I'm not.

You commented 40 times you're trying to get likes here?

Or did you realize I'm here and want to surpass me.

ugh, I never understood why anyone thinks their opinion is supposed to matter to the world. They have no self awareness that they're screaming into the void.

@@Scenario_animations Yeah but the void loves me.

They are ignoring me more than a Karen, give me likes, or you give me your soul >:)@@AIHumanEquality

Well i dont hate ai I believe through regulations it could be useful I DIDN'T MAKE AN AI OC FOR NO REASON!

@seantaggart7382 see the thing is that what we call ai (chatgpt and all that) isn't ACTUALLY ai. It's not artificial intelligence at all. Artificial, yes, but if it was truly intelligent it wouldn't rely on others to work. It wouldn't need to be fed art in order to make art, or use countless written works in order to talk in a way that seems smart. If any of it was actually ai like what we see in movies, it would be able to properly think for itself and give coherent thoughts and responses, not string together random words that don't make sense most of the time. If it was real ai it would be able to actually replace writers, but it can't

@@seantaggart7382I came up with tons of OC’s without the help of Ai. Sounds like a skill issue to me

@@ieatcheeselikeyouforbreakf2654 ahem AI THAT IS AN OC you didn't understand me properly

@@angstyuchiha hmm But with a bit of regulations maybe Im saying i want to see humanity evolve

I'm using that.

The keyword is "start", when professors say its a bad source they are talking about those who use wikipedia as their entire research. Which is especially egregious when wikipedia itself has sources you can elaborate on...

That also depends on what you are trying to look up. If you are trying to find names and dates, or really anything objective, then it is an incredible source. The more subjective a topic is the worse it will be as a source.

Well yes, but the thing that was changed to win the bet I mentioned /was/ a date so also no, not necessarily in the past. @@ninetailedfox579121

Yes, but you wouldn't want to have to go almost all the way round instead of the 1 or 2 stops you wanted to go.

Okay but they literally use lasers and plasma in Star Wars not swords so that kind of doesn't matter.

​@@AIHumanEqualityI'm no scientist but I don't think having armor jab into you because of a Lazer isn't exactly safe in the slightest

@@William_Nowin I was referring to the OP talking about weapons piercing the armor. I'm pointing out that metal objects aren't the weapon types used against armor it's more often lasers and plasma. So his critique which only really applies to iron to begin with doesn't apply here.

​@@AIHumanEquality eh who cares lol. Armor is armor, regardless of sex and gender

This true for medieval plate armor and a metal sword. This has as little to do with the design of a Star Wars armor as the design of a plate armor has to do with the design of a bulletproof vest.

My favs are honestly r/woooosh, r/engrish and r/oddlysatisfying or r/mildlyinfuriating

/j or /srs

@@Silv3rDoodl3 /srs

i love r/meirl

@@ohhello1809 oh thats a banger one too

You're going to surpass all my comments because I have Deja vu and prediction issues.

@@Abigblueworldi don’t understand the connection to the first comment ?

I knew it, so fucking sick of this.

@Abigblueworld maybe post actually good comments, I don't know.

@@Abigblueworld stop seeking validation on the internet and find yourself a hobby you genuinely enjoy

oh god, no

What

@@Abandonedchannel6900 remember the time she wore a meat dress? The most disgusting thing I've ever seen

@@Abandonedchannel6900 its one of the costumes Lady Gaga had on, not sure what occasion some awards or shit. she dressed herself in meat I shit u not.

​@passiveaggresivesquirrel2052 It's been like 15 years later too and y'all still talking about it so she did something right. 💁‍♀️

Another's libraries.

Can somebody not surpass my comments for 5 minutes? Cheese-it cries.

My guilty pleasure is actual pleasure.

Bro is my comments invisable@@AIHumanEquality

@@Abigblueworld Nope.

why am I so a dumbass woke@@AIHumanEquality

This is why I say, there is no such thing as, and I am only using one gender as, let's face it, men get shit on by a lot of society, "toxic masculinity". There is only masculinity and assholes who use it as a justification for their shitty behavior

That reminds me of how feminists are almost always considered toxic... even though I sincerely doubt that all of them are, and it's probably mostly just a loud minority.

Precisely! I dislike the terms in general because they try to force the toxicity on a specific gender or mindset, when that’s not the case. Anyone can be toxic, and there will always be toxic people, but masc/fem has nothing to do with it (unless it’s the off chance they make it their entire personality.. which is equally vile)

yeah , calling stuff toxic masculinity when they never call anything toxic feminity is downright sexism. Which is amusing because the people who call this stuff out usually act like they have the moral high ground when they're just spreading misandry.

​@@voidroadBingo. Glad to see some sense in the comments about that!

It's an Encyclopedia, and for a good reason. Encyclopedia is for gaining quick informations and for you to have a lead on what to search next.

That's a funny way to say Fandom

Thank you for your work in keeping facts straight and the world informed 😊

I agree but please learn punctuation.

who gives a shit about punctuation in a comment section?@@AIHumanEquality

@@shamusmoore Language is important, the clearer people can understand you the better. Common sense really.

Yes but I understood them just fine, If somehow you're unable to read just slightly altered text then womp womp I spose.@@AIHumanEquality

Yeah, I’m pretty badly asthmatic yet can still wear a mask with no problems. It changes when I can’t breathe from my nose, but yet again I’d probably be staying home without one on due to… y’know.. the coves

I don't pass, I haven't transitioned yet, and as of now, I never had that problem... I'm scared...

same as a trans male tho.

And then proceeded to say Nigerian flawlessly

And as another white guy, I assure you it's best to not try at all than to butcher someone else's language haha

Could be a dialectal or regional thing. I've heard "Nigerian" used several times but I've never actually heard "Ghanaian" used a single time in the almost thirty years I've been alive so I probably would have mispronounced it "Ga-neh-an".

@@erikperhs_then search ip how it’s pronounce. ive never seen people act this way for european nor asian countries but people never bother for african countries

@@chaeryeong991 that's true too.

Thanks man I needed that.

Need something like that for my burnt tongue lol Thanks tho!

I bet you're an expert with using burn cream.

Yeah sure, i was craving some!

Same

I bet you're early in a lot of things.

Heh, 9.11

Honestly, that makes Jesus saying all sins are forgiven make much more sense considering all the heinous crap I thought that covered. I guess that means murder and such would all fall under transgressions, while minor stuff like eating pork or shrimp would fall under sins, right? I like learning a bit about a lot of different religions in general, and I'm kinda surprised I've never heard this one (though I guess this would be known in most normal church circles, or at least implied, but the asshole types would deliberately leave it out so they can act out).

@@iateitguy903 Just like in criminal law, you can go under this simple rule of thumb: the greater the punishment, the greater the offense. So the transgressions will almost always bear the capital punishment...

@@adrianblake8876 Okay, thanks for adding to that! That's kinda what I figured, and I always did have some gaps in my knowledge here.

Specific denominations interpret the matter differently. And this goes for both Christianity as well as Judaism, though it's rare to stumble upon a Jew as vehemently "My Way or Hell" as Christians tend to be. Also, note that things we would classify as homosexuality (since the word didn't exist back then) are grouped into sets of actions that are explicitly called "Abominations" or "Transgressions"... the worst of the worst of the worst. There's viable debate around whether it's referring to general everyday actions or the actions within a specific context (namely that of sacred rites and ritual worship practices)... but at that point, you're talking about learning one of the oldest languages we have written text for, in order to justify whether or not your neighbors Chris and John should be killed because you looked into their bedroom at midnight and saw them doing butt-stuff. (And, further, if you thought they shouldn't be killed for their butt-sex... you would certainly not need to learn the whole Hebrew language anyway.)

@@onijester56 Which is why we need to separate religion and the state... Also "homosexuality is a transgression" doesn't roll of the tongue!? Seriously, I don't get why the English language decided to use "sin" as the catchall term...

Ik:(

When making the videos, I don't think they look at a post, and before recording themselves reading it, look at every other video on the subreddit to see if they've done it before. I mean, the whole gist of Emkay is people reacting to the posts, rather than just blandly reading them and skipping on to the next.

Not paying attention in med school to watch an Emkay video sounds stupid. The video isn't going anywhere.

⁠@@AIHumanEqualityDon’t disrespect your future heart surgeon!

​@@ieatcheeselikeyouforbreakf2654Not even in my country and he's not gonna be a future anything if he doesn't pay attention in class.

@@AIHumanEquality you act like a unripe unsalted walnut 😊

@@TeleTails And you act like a beached whale but you don't see me pointing it out.

ikr

It wasn't even all that recently. It was proven false within a decade or so from the time the guy who first put forth the theory. He wrote the book, then realized that he'd been observing _captured_ wolves in a zoo setting & this couldn't equate to wild behaviours, so he revamped his thesis by watching actual wild wolves & learned that they didn't behave the way he thought at all--they were _families_ with a mated pair (or two) female-led packs with the rest of the pack being the adult cubs who stayed with the group, eventually moving off to form their own packs, & spent his life afterward trying to debunk his own theory--still is, really. Frustrating, as fuck. And the dumb as rocks "manosphere" idiots are still spreading the "alpha" garbage even though the theory was debunked decades ago.

You said it yourself. The logic of a medieval plate armor does not apply to Star Wars armor. Medieval plate armor design was about turning head on strikes from a metal weapon into glancing blows. It could not stop a bullet. Very little about it transfer to designing a bulletproof vest, other than both are meant for protection.

@@esbenm6544 Fair enough. As long as the wearer is safe and comfortable, it's good armor

@@crabfromhell They did forgo sculpting a cleavage groove. This would logically be the main safety and comfort concern, not so much that the chest protrudes slightly.

@@esbenm6544 Yes, that was what I was concerned about. Medieval armor for men already had a protruding chest with a certain angle that deviated blows. For comfort, that is good. The cleavage groove seems unpractical

I’d assume the shape of the armor doesn’t matter, since a blaster bolt is a single contact point of energy. It won’t have tons of force behind it like a medieval giant mace or anything, it just has incredible searing/cutting power since it’s a superheated laser. Considering we’ve seen our mando friends tank quite a few shots regardless of the shape of armor, i’d think that quality of armor (beskar) is much more important, especially when you remember all the storm troopers who get one tapped by a measly pistol even with armor. Quality > Shape

I love Nigeria and Nigerians from india ❤. I lived there for 10 years.

@@plaidy. Ayy, nice! Love from Nigeria to India❤️. Where in Nigeria did ya live?

the inbetweeners

That's the internet equivalent of saying that you're not allowed to use the encyclopedia as a source because they want you to read more books, so just find out where the encyclopedia got their information and cite that. That's *stupid.*

@@ResidentMilf no it's meant to be a secondary source not primary, you're never meant to get all your info from Wikipedia itself but rather ideas and maybe sometimes some sources but the main way should always be research outside of Wikipedia wherever possible

Then maybe more teachers shoukd say what yours do. Mine didn't fucking explain that any assignment meant anything besides "Memorizing the information is mandatory do it or the school will ruin your life on purpose." More teachers need a fucking communications class honestly.

​@@zainanwar9281Now talk about Encyclopedia Brittanica. Or else.

I liked your Comment too

@@toonlinkssame! 😁

Chad momment.

Real

unoriginal and unfunny

Yeah, and some of the random articles can be so interesting

thats a bleak way to view things

@@petarurasinovic7875 She and what are you on about? This is the only time I posted this comment.

Because we want to talk ig

Why did you post this? Don't you know nobody cares what you think?

Opinions that have tolerance to other Opinions matter. Opinions that have kindness matter. Opinions that help other or have humanity in them matter. Opinions that speak for good matter.

Question, what is this? Also i love doctor whoooo