Ranking The Top 5 Premier League Managers EVER! 

Great debate..like back in the kick off days, no trolling for views, just everyone giving their honest opinions. We need more content like this.

From 96-06 wenger was great he won 3 titles,2 doubles being invincible and then with a shortage of budget he competed with fergie and chelsea's money and city lately.

Wenger finished in the top 4 every season on a shoestring budget to pay for the emirates stadium for over a decade until he left, even Klopp wasn't that consistent

“Klopps only ever won one trophy in a season” Well that’s just wrong mate. That season when Liverpool almost won the quadruple, they did win the domestic cup double.

Buvey talking about Klopp and money… as if Wenger didn’t have over a decade paying off the Emirates debt. Look at some of those dross squads - Gervinho, Djourou, Chamakh, etc. still got into the top four and competed some years. The vast majority of other managers would’ve walked when they had the opportunity.

Kids these days don't realise how good Wenger was. Entertaining, revolutionary, trophy winning football, then suddenly hindered financially just as money started spiralling out of control in the Premier League (Chelsea & City), and still managed to consistently finish top 4. For me he's at least 3rd on the list.

I dont blame buvey. He started watching football in 2008

I don't understand why it's "Top 5 PL Managers EVER!" but a lot of the criteria seems to be based on trophies outside of the PL…

1. Sir Alex Ferguson 2. Pep Guardiola 3. Jose Mourinho 4. Arsene Wenger 5. Jurgen Klopp

Not close between Wenger and Klopp if we're looking at PL managers. Klopp is fantastic and as a United fan, I envy Liverpool for having him all these years. But Wenger's legacy in PL is closer to Fergie and Pep than to Klopp. Absolutely top 3. In my opinion: 1. Sir Alex 2. Pep 3. Wenger 4. Mourinho 5. Klopp

Buvy doesn’t seem to realise that in a lot of the wenger and fergie era the prem wasn’t the behemoth it is now and the talent was much more spread out. Serie A teams were stacked as hell, so were the German, Spanish and even the French teams so it was much harder to win in Europe.

Arsene Wenger was also under financial restriction after building the emirates stadium, so that fsg point with klopp doesnt really count. Having said that i think it´s fair to say that its hard to compare different managers in different eras with all of them having their own defining attributes and weaknesses you could point to. Love Arsene being an Arsenal fan for 20 years because of him and some players of course, but also love Kloppo as a german and football enjoyer!

Bob paisley: 9 years at Liverpool: 20 trophies total , 3 champions league titles, 6 English champions(premier league), 6 super cups etc An underrated maneger for sure

Wenger stayed there for 22 years, devoted his life for the club, when he could have left earlier. Klopp himself wants to leave now, as anyone would want a break. Wenger stayed there however, accepted the modest budgets and just about held Arsenal. Longevity is highly underrated.

Between 2019-2020 Liverpool took 103 points out of 105 but nah Adam thinks they’d win a cup final 😂

Wenger won 3 prems and 4 fa cups in 8 years, klopp got 1 and the ucl. Numbers don’t lie buvey 🤣

Buvey only has Klopp above Wenger to make Pep's accomplishments look more impressive, transparently propping up his position

2005 to 2014 is not over a decade it's 8 seasons of no trophies and a few FA cup finals as opposed to a record 7. Yes we beat Hull and Villa in finals but we had to beat Liverpool, Spurs and Man Utd to win those cups.

Buvey truly showed in 5 minutes that he's only followed football for 12 years, lads dense!! "never seen a team batter city the way liverpool have" must forget football started before saudis came in

Rory commenting on football is hilarious

Ask a city fan United fan and a Chelsea fan who the best managers have been and they'll put their own managers in the top three lol what a shock!

The way Liverpool and city fans suck each other off is crazy

1. Fergie 2. Wenger 3. Klopp 4. Guardiola 5. Mourinho Anything Pep and Jose achieved was off the back of billionaire owners. How Wenger and Klopp managed to stay competitive and winning trophies despite their net spend being significantly less than their rivals is what sets them apart. Fergie is just the goat, longevity, rebuilding teams, trophies he’s number 1. But Guardiola and Mourinho’s success is based on financial dopping

Klopp only has 1 more major title than Pellegrini at City

I’m not say Ranieri is top 5 but he has the single greatest premier league achievement as manager

"Klopps only ever won 1 trophy in a season"... He literally won a double 2 seasons back beating Chelsea in both finals😂😂😂

Before I even watch this. Adam picks SAF Buvey Picks Pep. And Rory has the deciding vote.

To put klopp above Wenger is absolutely ridiculous.

1. Fergie 2. Pep 3. Wenger 4. Mourinho 5. Klopp

Buvey didn’t watch football when Arsenal and AW were winning titles. He became a football fan in 2009 when his plastic club was founded.

Nah bruh Rory's take on Jose about him being on par with sir alex during his "peak" is outrageous 💀

Buvey says FSG didn't invest so they ruined Klopp's chances yet Arsenal spent fk all money (net spend) for close to a decade after they moved into the emirates and he still managed to win some FA cups at least, sold Henry, Fabregas, Van Persie etc and then never replaced them with anyone. Wenger also had to manage against Fergie and prime Man Utd so its not like he didn't have any competition.

Wenger was top drawer for the first half of his Arsenal career! But you can’t just ignore that he turned into a laughing stock for the last 10 years It’s hard to decide the 4th and 5th spot between him and Klopp We all know above that is: 1. Sir Alex Ferguson 2. Pep Guardiola 3. Jose Mourinho

I think a lot of people forget what Wenger had to work with after the move to the Emirates. He lost all of his best players and couldn't replace those levels because he was always on a tight budget

If Pep manages as long as SAF, he will have 2x the trophy cabinet.

Buvey is a madman.... No way Klopp above Wenger. Klopp had 2 major trophies in a 7 year span.... Wenger had 2 league doubles and a title winning season without being beaten in a 7 year span. No debate whatsoever.

Mourinho never won the champions league as an epl manager. We talking about best epl managers.

I think people have have Forgot about George Graham

Sir Alex Pep Mourinho Wenger Klopp

Buvey putting Klopp over Wenger is just ridiculous

The only correct order 1. Sir Alex Ferguson 2. Pep Guardiolia 3. Jose Mourinho 4. Arsen Wenger. 5 Jurgen Kloop. A special mention to Claudio Rannire. That Leicester city fairytale was special.

The prem are changing ffp rules next year so Man City won’t get done

Pep may not have been around in the period when those charges are being investigated for. But they effect whether he was at city in the first place. How do you explain going from having an owner that went bankrupt in 2008 and winning nothing to attracting the best manager around in 2016..... Fishy

I love Klopp, but to have Klopp above Wenger is insane. Klopp has been at Liverpool for 8 years, and won 1 title. this is top PREMIER LEAGUE managers not all time managers. In the prem Wenger vs Klopp isnt close.

Once Pep wins 4 in a row he goes above Fergie. He’s matched Fergies achievements and bettered them. Talking about 115 charges like we all aren’t aware of some of the blatant match fixing during that Fergie era. No conceded penalties at home in 10 years 🤐🤐🤐

Pep Ferguson Wenger Mourinho Klopp. This is the order. No need to debate

So wait 115 charges changes peps legacy, but doesn't change klopps?

Pep is so clear in front It actually hurts

Rory arguing that Wenger was better (which I agree with), but then goes on about Arsenal having the most stars, which surely contradicts his point about him being a better manager than Klopp?

I am an arsenal fan because of Wenger, in my country Serie A was popular but after the 98 world cup the Premier league got popular mainly because of the Wenger Ferguson derby. For a lot of us the most entertaining league is the Premier league which means you owe a lot to Wenger.

Saying klopp has never won more than 1 trophy in a season when they literally did a domestic double last season 😂

“Klopps only ever won one trophy in a season” literally 20 seconds after talking about how close Liverpool were to the quadruple in their domestic double season. Also saying that being close to the quadruple was generous is completely false. There’s nothing generous about it. An 86th minute gundogan goal stopped the treble. And a 1-0 loss to the best goalkeeping performance a champions league final has ever seen stopped the ucl

1. Sir Alex Ferguson 2. pep guardiola 3. Arsene Wenger 4. Jose Mourinho 5. Jurgen Klopp This is my list and being a Liverpool fan for 23 years -

My list: 1. Sir Alex 2. Wenger 3. Klopp 4. Pep 5. Mourinho Reasoning: Sir Alex is pretty obvious so I won't go too deep into it. But he's won by far the most PL titles. Put Man Utd back on the map and kept them at the top for over 20 years. Reinvented and rebuilt the squad after the 90s and built another squad that won 3 straight PL titles AND a UCL in 2008. Wenger and Klopp I put over Pep and Mourinho because they did simply didn't have the resources of Pep or Mourinho yet still revived 2 massive clubs. Context and resources matters. Wenger changed English football and football culture by making it more professional, doing away with the drinking, etc. His team played brilliant modern football that simply wasn't seen in England at the time. He started the first real wave of bringing in exotic foreign players. Yeah man Utd had Cantona who was the first, but Wenger did that with virtually half his squad which was unheard of at the time. He was also a master of unearthing talents and developing players from mere "talents" to genuine world beaters. Henry, Vieira, Cesc, RVP, Ashley Cole, Anelka, etc, etc. He won 3 league titles, 2 doubles and went one season undefeated. And throw in a UCL and Uefa Cup final for good measure. And as for Klopp being ahead of Pep and Mourinho it's down to the fact that he did more with less. What he did with and for Liverpool is more impressive than what Pep did with City or Mourinho with Chelsea. Again; CONTEXT MATTERS. Not every job is the same. Different clubs have different circumstances, different resources, etc. Klopp has revived not one but TWO historic clubs. BVB and Liverpool. You have to look at the club he inherited vs Pep or Mourinho and what he had to work with. He inherited a club which hadn't won the league title since 1990. A bang average squad full of players like Milner, Henderson, Andy Carrol, Lallana, Balotelli, Josue, etc. Milner and Henderson were considered finished or scrubs until Klopp revived their careers. He turned decent players like Salah, Firmino or Mane into world class players. He worked on a much smaller budget than Pep and with inferior talents. But yet he won a league title and probably should have won 2-3 because they approached the 100 point mark a couple of times and failed to win. And High 90s in points would be enough to win a league title in virtually every other season. He also made 3 UCL finals in his time with Liverpool (more than Man City) and he won 1 of those. The 2 times he lost was both to RM who are the most successful side of the 21 century in Europe winning 5 titles in less than a decade. Pep and Mourinho were fantastic and achieved a lot. No doubt about it... But Mourinho walked into a side which was the richest team in Europe at the time right after Abramovich took over. He spent record amount at the time to strengthen an already strong side which was runners up the prior season under Ranieri. Chelsea never played the sort of football that Arsenal, or Liverpool or Man Utd or Man City played under Sir Alex, Wenger, Klopp or Pep. They were great, but they were more a physically imposing side that bullied and pushed others around. A defensive side. This also happened at a time where Arsenal started to decline and had no money due to having to pay off their new stadium so Arsenal instead of strengthening or replacing world class players with equal quality players actually kept selling off their best players like Vieira, Henry, Bergkamp, Pires, Sol Campbell, Ashley Cole. They never replaced those guys with equal quality. That's when they began their decline. And Man Utd was also in transition during those years with Ronaldo and Rooney being so young, midfield needing a freshening, etc. So there wasn't much genuine competition for that Chelsea side with all those resources. Once Man Utd rebuilt and started to reach a very high level again they overtook Chelsea and won 3 straight titles and Mourinho instead of fighting ran away to Italy to manage the best squad in Serie A at the time who had taken advantage of Calcioppolli destroying Juventus and Milan. Mourihno besides what he did at Porto ALWAYS went to the most talented squad in a given league who had the most resources at the time...Essentially, the team that was favorites to win anyways. He never revived any clubs like Sir Alex, Wenger or Klopp. He never developed players like they did which is a big part of being a world class coach. He was simply an opportunist who went to the most advantageous situations like at Chelsea or Inter and then RM with Ronaldo, Benzema, Kaka, etc. And this with Pep it's the same thing as Mourihno. But he achieved more in England and actually improves and develops young talents. But at City he was given a team which already won league titles. Best squad. Most money to spend for new players and any players he wants, so on and so forth. Again, it's the most advantageous position to be in as a coach. We've never seen whether Pep could revive a club and built it into a juggernaut. Like Wenger did at Arsenal, or Sir Alex or like Klopp has done numerous times. Those were extremely tough tasks and yet those guys did it with their genius. Pep has always worked with teams that were ALREADY juggernauts before he even arrived. The man's first job was being gifted that legendary Barca squad which featured Ronaldinho, prime Messi, Xavi, Iniesta, Puyol, Etoo, Henry, etc. A team which already won league titles and a UCL. Then right after that he took over Bayern who were just off the back of a treble! Then after Bayern the champions of England who had the best squad in EPL already AND unlimited resources. What I'm saying is PLENTY of managers could win and get massive results with the resources Pep has been given, But almost none can do what Sir Alex, Wenger or Klopp has done. And that for me is the biggest difference. I don't think Pep or Mourihno could have done at Dortmund or Liverpool what Klopp did. Or what Sir Alex did with Man Utd. Or what Wenger did for Arsenal.

My 5 are Sir Alex, Wenger, Mourinho, Klopp & Pep. Not even gonna bother trying to rank them in order because it’s genuinely impossible

If we're only talking Premier League it goes Fergie, Pep, Mourinho, Wenger, Ranieri. Fergie is obvious - two three in a rows, 13 titles overall. Pep has won 3 in a row, Mourinho has retained. Wenger never retained but won 3 titles and went unbeaten in one of those seasons while Ranieri only won one but did so at 5000-1 odds having saved Leicester from relegation the year before. Klopp was great for Liverpool in giving them their first title in 30 years but when you look at the Premier League era as a whole, frankly 1 title isn't enough of a return for Klopp's time at Liverpool. Obviously, I'm talking about PL only. If you include other trophies for overall rankings then you can have a conversation about putting Klopp in the top 5 but as a Premier League manager, Klopp is on the same tier as the other managers who won one title.

Buevy is genuinely a spanner

Rory talking about Chelsea giving up on 95pts, well that’s similar to Wengers invincibles. 4 of their 12 draws came in their last 7 games. The league was wrapped up and they were playing conservatively to remain unbeaten.

Had Arsene Wenger not had to Sell players to keep within the limits of FFP whilst funding the stadium, he would have won more titles. Much better manager than Klopp

Klopp had to deal with 1 season of adversity last year and missed top 4. Meanwhile Wenger got top 4 for 20 straight years, with no money (all being paid to the stadium), losing his best players every year. Chamakh, Sanogo, Mustafi, starting for Arsenal. I don’t think any other manager can replicate that. And when he had a proper team, he won 2 doubles, an Invincible, formed the greatest PL rivalry, and the most exciting free flowing football the league has seen since. Wenger and Arsenal revolutionised football in the late 90s and and made the Premier League truly global in the early 2000s. Just because he was there for too long, shouldn’t hamper his ranking as a great. If he left in 2004, and managed 9 seasons for Arsenal (the exact same as Klopp), would he be ranked higher?

If its based upon PL only than yeah SAF should be first if its overall than Pep without a doubt

I think Adam nailed it on the head when it comes to Pep. Obviously he never has too now, hes an elite manager whos won it all, but hes never built a club,. He did his apprenticeship at Barca's youth team, hes then only managed the biggest teams in the biggest leagues, who can out spend opposition and had great players already there for him. If Fergie had joined in 92-94ish time having been the youth team manager we would be having a different conversation. But he didnt, and he has success at Aberdeen on his CV. Managers need good players, look at Jose's Porto side, but theres something about success at Porto and Aberdeen that just more impressive than at Bayern or CIty. Leicester winning the league is the greatest achievement of all time, they had Kane, Mahrez, the son of the greatest PL GK of all time between the sticks, its still the greatest achievement. Those who love Pep will say he doesnt need it, but for me, if he wants to be the greatest manager ever, not just PL, but of all time, in any league, its the one thing missing.

Ignoring the financial circumstances in which every manager operated is really unfair. Guardiola and Mourinho had all the money in the world. Ferguson had financial power. None of them had to sell their best players every year for a decade and try to compete.

Buvy doesn’t have enough football knowledge. Wenger has 3 titles in 22, fair. He won those three within 6 years, but that’s a title every 7 years. He’s the most successful manager in the FA Cup, better than SAF. He’s credited with revolutionising the league in England. Klopp has been immense for Liverpool but Wenger’s legacy is bigger and better

This channel has replaced Football Daily in my life.

I'm a spurs fan and I have Wenger above Mourinho. If we look at their Manager career in total then Mourinho is above Wenger, but this is just their career at premier league clubs. It pains me say it, but people tend to overlook the fact that Wenger also won a record 7 FA cups.

The Invincibles would dominate Liverpool. Van Dijk can't deal with Strikers in a 1v1 got rinsed by Toney, Mitrovic and more, Henry and Bergkamp would bully him. Aura defending backing off players until they get free shots off. Salah with his bottom 15th percentile take on success in Europe, Cole would have him locked down. Henderson vs Viera? Liverpool the most overrated era in Premier League history.

Pep changed English football. End of debate.

SAF is the best but Pep could still have like 20 more years in his managerial career and could very well be regarded as the best when he retires, he's won a ridiciulous amount of trophies and still might not even be half way into his career

nah rory meat riding jose too hard with that 03-06 praise. you do realise pep guardiola's barcelona exists. added edit here, pep is definitely now head and shoulders clear of saf man. don't mean to mention them again but you've got to bare in mind, pep created the best football team ever and forever changed and transformed barcelona, the 2nd biggest football team in the world within a period of 4 years. it took farrrr longer for ferguson to do so at manchester united. if you want to compare them head-to-head, pep's best team played against ferguson's best team twice in the biggest matches possible. pep's best teams against ferguson's best teams, the result was that barcelona absolutely wiped the floor with manchester united in both games. its not just the quality of the players, in 07/08 united got past barcelona en route to the final. the very next season guardiola completely revamps the squad and playstyle, within 3-4 months everything clicks and we have the best team that has ever existed. the notion that he was given all the tools is a fallacy, in his first season the following leave: deco, zambrotta, lilian thuram retires, and ronaldinho. brought in dani alves, keita, pique, promoted busquets, thiago. he revolutionised the team within 1 transfer window and that can not be understated, in fact it is only overshadowed because we only remember how good that team was. it took ferguson what, 7-8 years to even win a league title? pep's only lost 3 league titles lmao. before coming to man city, he had reached 7 straight ucl semi finals. keep in mind ferguson only made 6 semi finals in his whole career. pep's first job was straight into the deep end unlike ferguson, ferguson was given so much more time with multiple occasions where he was bordering on a sacking at united. there have never even been mutters of pep being sacked in his entire career🤣, not even at fucking bayern munich where fans were on jupp heynckes back the same season they did a treble. putting accolades aside, guardiola has completely changed football globally and he does so rapidly in the premier league every season. the same way wenger is talked about for revolutionising football is taken and multiplied by 10 with pep, I for one really am not a fan of his influence on football since he got to bayern and now manchester city. to me there is very little to argue in fergie's favour. it feels like the messi vs ronaldo debate where there are individual statistics or attributes that ronaldo has over messi but in the vast majority of qualities what messi does is just surreal and makes it an unfair argument. it's not unfair now but by the time pep's career has finished it will almost mirror the dispute, pep is pep.

A problem I have with these when these are discussed is when questions are posed around "would this historic side beat this historic side". It's an impossible question, especially as the gap in years increases between teams. Football is ever evolving and improving, and that has only been encouraged, especially in England, with the commercialisation of the Premier League and the introduction of big money. It's hardly fair to compare older sides against the standards of more recent sides as they didn't have the same resources and understanding of the game that we have now.

Wenger had a shoestring budget with the stadium build and such. What a disingenuous view

underated stat: Klopp is simultaneously the last manager to win the premier league not managing man city and the last manager to win the bundesliga not managing bayern

Love how everyone disrespects Wenger Compare his spending with Pep's, Klopp's and Jose's And I know inflation and differnet times are also a factor BUT we all know he always had the least amount of money out of these 4 Wenger 22 seasons, spent 762,3 million Mourinho 12 seasons, spent 1,14 billion Pep 8 seasons, spent 1,05 billion Klopp 9 seasons, 613 million

Great debate!!! SAF is still number 1 on the list of EPL managers. Rory is correct when he says Pep even making it a debate is a monumental achievement. More importantly, those five managers built the league up higher where the best players want to play there and English sides are winning European competitions. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

Super 6 works only if located in UK? I love in Malta, is it possible?

Mourinho isn't given enough credit for walking back in to the prem almost 10 years later and winning the league. I doubt any other manager on the list, bar Fergie and possibly Pep, could do that.

Depends if it's based on Premier league performance, European competition performance with a Premier league team, or on overall career.

Arsenal would have murdered Liverpool. Imagine Henry just abusing Trent

Good debate, but you have to decide, if it is only achievements in the PL or also outside of it. Because Rory mentions what Mourinho did in Inter and Real, which shouldn't be part of this. If you change the rules, than Guardiola, Klopp, Mourinho and Ancelotti are suddenly somewhere else. It would suddenly be Ferguson, Guardiola, Mourinho and Ancelotti in discussion for the first place and Klopp clearly 5th and Wenger 6th (because he didnt win the CL and reached final once...).

Klopp won a cup double, won the ucl, won liverpools 1st prem title, add on the club world cup. All against clubs like united, chelsea and city spending billions. Imo it goes sir alex number 1, wenger 2, jose 3, klopp 4. If we win a cup treble this season he goes 3rd ahead of jose.

I don't get the love for The Sacked One. He was fired from his last 5 jobs, including 3 in the Premier League 😂

Jurgen Klopp and Pep have never been sacked as managers, while Mourinho prop hits double figures in sackings

Klopp didn’t only win 1 trophy in a season Liverpool won the FA cup AND the league cup same season what klopp done is miles better than what wenger done Liverpool just happened to be up against one of the greatest sides the premier league has ever seen

Out of the PL managers who have won PL once .Ancelloti, Ranieri, Dalglish , Pellegrini, Mancini...Klopp is best of that lot ..so 5th is correct place in this ranking!..Although Ranieri's achievement was special!

Pep is clear of Fergie, UK people will never admit but we all know its true

Wenger was berated by his own fans in the end and eventually got forced out.

If we're talking just about their time in English football: 1. SAF 2. Pep 3. Wenger 4. Mourinho 5. Klopp 6. Ancelotti 7. Ranieri 8. Mancini

With wenger he sacrificed his legacy for the club. He could have left Arsenal in 2006 and gone to madrid and won the ucl but he didn't. If you look at klopp rn, its evident that Liverpool project under him is going a bit downhill. The signings since he took over from edwards have been questionable. This season is only because of 3-4 players especially van dijk. If klopp is to stay at Liverpool for another 4 years then you might end up not even putting up in the list

putting klopp over wenger is disrespectful to wenger, people only rememeber the back end of wengers reign

Time is the only difference between Fergie and Pep. As a United fan what Fergie did was unrivaled. Several rebuilds, multiple changes to key personal and seamless transitions of the changes didn't effect results. Once Pep has done a minimum of 15 years you can start comparing what they have achieved. The other thing is Fergie oversaw a period where United were predominantly a British team with a few foreign players. He still was able to achieve success with this formula when Chelsea were playing 8-9 foreigners per game. He was still able to dominate a generation with still promoting local youth where other clubs just spent the money and bought ready made players. Two different generations but Pep has done incredibly well with a club that already had foundations in place and he came on and conducted the ingredients that were already there. Fergie grew the ingredients, harvested them, baked them and served them. Pep is just a master baker. 2 very different approaches and time will tell if Pep is in his class. It's a long time to win 13 league titles......

The top two are cemented its pep and fergie, the other 3 can be debated and interchangeable based on your criteria and and biases, to the Klopp v Wenger debate it's worth noting he won 7 FA cups, thats more than most teams in their history

crazy how much more serious this is compared to when rory is yapping nonsense about salah, pochettino and emery and practically anybody else that is incredibly mid

To the guy who always gets shut down when he brings up the 115 charges: The charges don't have to be found guilty because they'll find a way to get out of it. It's there for everyone to see how clubs benefit from insane amounts of financial doping. The Artificial Construct of Teams like Chelsea, City, PSG etc. will always have shade, no one had to build it. Clubs like Bayern, Man United, Barca, Madrid, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ac, Inter, Juve were all built by exceptional people and players and it will always be more special and more accepted. Smaller clubs getting doped is not Robin Hood challenging elites, its systematic enrichment of rich businessmen buying in to football. Football probably will have fewer and fewer stories of clubs being built and probably only be artificial clubs leading the way unfortunately I doubt we will see another Klopp to Liverpool story in our Life time but i hope I am wrong.

1. Sir Alex Ferguson 2. Pep Guardiola 3. Arsene Wenger 4. Jurgen Klopp 5. Jose Mourinho Jose is one of my favourite managers of all time but I believe in this debate Loyalty plays a big factor and Jose has None 0 ✊

Do one of these but for managers that haven't managed at a top 6 club. I think that would be super interesting.

Here's why Klopp is a better PREMIER LEAGUE manager than Wenger... *Proceeds to talk about non premier league trophies * 🤦‍♂️

People say Klopp has been working with so little. Arsene Wenger was working with even less. He consistently made money on players. His budget was less than Klopp because he was investing in the new stadium as well. Wenger doesnt get enough credit for doing it with a smaller budget as well as selling players at the right time. he got bags of money for good players at the right time. This is why Wenger is just ahea of klopp for me.

We should stop judging only by who won it. We should also consider who came very close. A manager who gets to the finals 3 times for example has more respect to he who only gets there once and wins but then never leaves the group stage after that.

1. Frank de Boer 2. Steve Wigley 3. Remi Garde 4. Steve Kean 5. Ole-Gunnar Solskjaer