Sufferage puts a state-sponsored wedge between husband and wife. God makes them one, the state divides them into two. Put another way, women’s sufferage is anti-covenantal because it elevates individualism over covenantal union. Women have voted to obligate the state to fulfill the duties of a husband and a mother. The state is the provider and protector so women can thrive without a husband, the state raises children so that women can avoid obligation and thrive in individual (non-covenantal) pursuits.
@@aramisy.cajigas744 Seems that those "beta" pastors are the tyrants that Aristotle referred to. Aristotle noticed in his time that tyrants (the Greeks would make the difference between authority and tyranny) would easily empower women at the expense of men because tyrants don't fear women but MEN.
@@framboise595 Hmm, interesting point. I forgot my college years when they talked about Aristotle, the sophists, and the philosophers; and the sophists we're those who twisted wisdom (sophia) to convince the masses. Anyway, to comment on your comment, I thought those beta (weak) pastors/sophists/tyrants empower women at the expense of men because they were afraid of women, instead of men, and that's why they appease women's tickly ears. I saw it like that, but your point made me think. What if they're just afraid of truth (both men and women)?
Hey if Women don't get the right to vote then Women shouldn't have to pay Taxes either as no Taxation without representation. 🤨 Also what about Single Women, women without close male relatives & Widows?🤨
You just unintentionally explained why the government passed the 19th ammendment. They wanted an extra tax group. And if both men and women worked jobs then they can lower wages and increase costs. Women's suffrage is exactly why the cost of living has increased through the years.
Everyone is taxed but not everyone votes. Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
Yes, the whole "men are less emotional" is just not true. And there are many men (and from the vitriol I've seen most of the men in this comment section) who vote and make other decisions as well based purely on emotion.
Can someone please go to the house of this misogynistic bully and check on his poor wife and children? I hope he doesn't have any daughters. I really fear for his family because his ideas are scary! You can already feel he's abusive to his wife, he doesn't see her as his equal. The nonsense he's saying is so insulting to women! I hope his wife and daughters can get help out of this misogynistic patriarchal bs system! Jesus will set women FREE!!!
@cindycaricos3379 GOD has never seen one woman as equal to the MAN he made in his image and as his golory. You hate God as much as you hate his real spokesmen. Wives , submit to your husbands in everything Ephesians 5:25
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
@@supersenpainovablaze7078 His wife is not stupid, she's in danger because he's an abusive man! I'm really really worried for his wife and daughters, and any woman near that misogynistic man!
@@lepp6598 some people have more of an investment in the countries well being than others. 1 example if you dont have any family in the country or dont own any land, you are more likely to vote for selfish reasons. if youre a person with foresight youll understand how that ends
It’s been well documented that the suffrage movement was inextricably linked to the temperance movement. Women were not being cared for by their drunkard husbands and effectively abandoned. In this scenario of a household vote, a woman has zero protection against abuse and her rights to property could easily be stripped. I am thankful for my right to vote and the idea that a husband would effectively speak for his wife in all areas of conviction seems to deny the biblical concept of total depravity. As we know, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It's also been well documented that the number 1 enemy/group/opponent/counter protestors to the suffragettes were married women with children, not drunkard/vice filled men who knew no better for themselves and others. Catholics had annulments and shunning for unrepentant, grave sin and we still have tithes for clothing/food today for widows/the poor, what happens when funds get low is the priest tells it to us straight up and we give more that week/month/reduce our own needs for the community's benefit, which the stabilizes itself until the central Church gives the funds monthly instead of depending on individual charity to sustain it. Now we have unsustainable welfare programs that will hurt both wives and children in the long term, just like drugs, they sound good at the moment, but will poison society/individuals/families over time.
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
@@1OnlyGot7 Okay, tell me about all the times in history when a woman or "women" voted men into war. Now compare that to all the times when men dissallowed women from getting an abortion, forced women to get an abortion, forced women to get married, dissallowed education, etc.. The draft is not an issue and hasn't been for roughly 50 years. You're just looking for excuses to hate women and that's it.
@@1OnlyGot7so then, write to your representative about repealing the draft. It hasn't been used in 50 years anyway. Besides if you get drafted and don't want to serve, just claim you have bone spurs.
If women dont need the vote because her husband will vote for her needs on her behalf. What about Widows, single women, Women with dead or absent Fathers?
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
@@DexterMorgan-sd4jx But if they commit a crime or felony they are tried as adults no? They are held to be responsible adults not children. Also they can serve in the military along with men but they shouldn't be allowed to vote? Your comment is stupid.
@@aihaven345 uhh sure. Or I just notice when people think I deserve less rights than any other human because I don't have a penis. Although it's interesting that you assume my problem stems from my father being a bad father
Ok let have a look at the state of the United States. Understand that women put Joe Biden in office and have a look at the results. Democrats are liars. Women are easily emotionally manipulated. It really is that simple.
Please don't ever change, Pastor Joel. Your honesty and boldness and courage is shocking and so refreshing in times such as these. With your speaking such bold truth as this, the full fury of Satan and his demons are coming for you. He will try to bring you down using all his subtle, seductive, clever ways. Satan doesn't care about atheists or weak, ineffective Christians. But he hates those who can effectively articulate the word of truth, and who boldly stand up for it. Put on your full armor every day. Stay strong. Keep speaking the truth. God will protect you, and reward you with peace and joy.
@@RightResponseMinistries i thought the video was spot on and even my own mother and her friend has said this country went down the tubes after women started voting. With that said as a single 22 year old man I think there is a strong argument to say we should go a step farther and say only married men should vote because single men arnt a complete house hold and dont have a helpmate which is necessary for the man (thats the rule not exception) and a single man doesnt have the complementary virtues of the woman influencing him like you discussed. With that said im going to keep voting and discussing current events with my christian parents regularly when I visit them but Do you there would be good if our country implement that policy.
@@RightResponseMinistries Oh Elect One, slave and Ambassador of The MOST HIGH, YHWH In the Flesh, KING YESHUA -be Encouraged! You have Saints who actually Live Out the very things that We discuss/things You teach, that We find in Holy Scripture, in Faithful Obedience (as It IS written, One Main End of the Gospel), praying for You and being built up by GOD Working and Willing in and through You, Brother Joel. YHWH Bless n Keep You in HIS Sovereign Right Hand of of Favor, inheritance, Power, and Blessing that No One can pluck You from. Solí DÉÕ gloía B O O M'n on 'em
@@N81999 that’s going too far, because single men are Biblically heads of households. If you want to deny suffrage to men living at home with mom and dad, that would be Biblical
As a woman, you can vote for a government that will get us into a war. In which all the men that didn't vote for this government, will be drafted and all the women will not be. Where is the justice in that, Emily?
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
I have to disagree with you here, Joel. Eve being deceived does not make women less-than. Even if it did, I don't see that logically extending into a coherent political philosophy for civil government. I don't see a biblical prohibition on women participating in civil government. There is a very clear prohibition on women participating as pastors, deacons, or elders, but not as voters in elections for civil officers or referendums.
Eve being deceived didn't make her less-than. It was a reflection on an innate quality of women's nature. 1 Peter 3 states that women are the weaker vessel. This was not an onset of sins entrance in the world, it preexisted it. Who bore the responsibility for sins entrance into the world? It was not Even but Adam who did (see Romans 5) however, 1 Peter 3, men are instructed to honor the women for her weaknesses. It's an honorable aspect of a women's nature. It's an integral and beautiful part of women's role. It existed in Eve, and it was Adam responsibility to protect and defend and lead Eve and he failed and the responsibility for sin entering into the world is upon HIS shoulders, not upon Eve's
@@sawyeranderson1394 Please don't be deceived yourself. Women are not just "weaker". They are more wicked and rebellious than men and naturally further from God in essence Man is the glory of GOD but the woman is the golory of man. 1 Co 11 Just consider the horrible state of the West after decades of Luciferian Feminism. How come when women are in control over men , sex tends to happen everywhere BUT within the confines of marriage ? Isn't it evidence that women love EVIL more than good ? How come so-called Christian men today ( = henpecked wimps) are stuck in "sexless marriages" (oxymoron) and cannot assert their GOD given rights anymore when GOD , THEIR Lord tells men to get married to act on their sexual urges ? 1 Co 7:4 See what happens when those "weaker vessels" run the show ? GOD 's will for his dear sons in marriage is baffled , mocked , hated because women are enemies. Just as Eve was. Enemies who want control. Stop thinking that women don't know what they do. They're weaker but not 100% weak. They are evil. Decades of Feminism have proved it. God told men to rule. But men don't rule. They are mesmerised by the "weaker vessel".
I agree with you 100% Pastor Joel... Because I believe that's what the scriptures teach us. I am a 55 year old woman and long before I was saved I used to always say that women's lib ruined our society. Thank you so much for your boldness and your faithfulness to the Lord and His Word. Please keep feeding HIS sheep. We need more bold pastures like you. God bless you and your family! 🙏
@@marcelschmidt1083 Not true. Pastor Joel has never said anything remotely like that. I think you are one of the angry, foaming at the mouth feminists who just can't handle hearing the truth from God's word when it comes to women's roles in the family and society.
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
Joel you need to be very careful. You have some very strong opinions and I feel like you are seeking to have more power than you need. This can be dangerous. And obviously I disagree with you. I am gonna get off your channel now bc I am not a Calvinist or post millennial and I strongly disagree with your views on women. I have been watching you mostly bc of your post millennial views and to learn more (I have found that behaviors are driven by beliefs) but you are over the top on the womens things. You will be held accountable. I also realize you don't like women calling you out but you don't make the rules, God does.
1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And yet there is no real rescue. Because they are always in bondage. As their religion.. states. This is by birth a slave species then and only women are slaves. That is so not a very good thought ever to hold. Knowing your life is pointless and worthless. What a bunch of bs.
The Bible and Scripture have been used by the power structure to justify chattel slavery (Because of Noah’s curse on Ham to mean black people were cursed to be forever slaves), to justify treating women like house slaves, justify segregation and Jim Crow with Acts 17:26, justify apartheid in South Africa, etc. etc. it all depends on how you interpret Scripture. Other interpretations of Paul’s letters are that he was quoting his audiences’ arguments and then responding back to them. Another interpretation is that all women at this time were uneducated. Of course the educated should teach. But many men have used the Bible against natives, blacks, and women for far too long. The consistent problem with translation and interpretation has been that an exclusive group (dare I say white men) have claimed to be the sole translators and interpreters of Scripture.
This thread reads like a recording of the minutes from a meeting of the He-Man Women Haters Club. I think you folks might be happier living someplace like Iran, Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia.
@@souzajustin19d Well the point being that the places mentioned are all islamic countries. Which would suck if you were a christian. The point being that these are extremely patriarchal societies where women are treated as property and have little to no rights at all. For a man it's not a place I would care to be either.
look, man, you're honest I'll give you that. And I'm definitely a right-winged conservative fellow very much against modern feminism. But I do think that if any population of people does not have the right to vote they will naturally be vulnerable to injustices that only the represented population has any power to change. And as our society pushes further from the family, women would be less and less represented by their husbands and would thus become silent altogether. Perhaps your arguments would make sense if we lived in a society where women were actually represented by their husbands and the family structure was firmly planted. Also just because one population votes different than you does not mean that they should not have the right to vote, that reasoning completely undermines the point of democracy. So your first point just sounds completely ridiculous to me.
@landanjenson6947 Do you realise that women are not men in anyway? That God put men in the power position everywhere , in every place in society , family , church ?
Also, using 'drafting women' into the service is a weak argument to take away women's Constitutional Right to vote. The draft hasn't been used in over 50 years, is extremely unpopular, and is easily avoided by the well-off.
Actually, The argument that a draft is “no longer meaningful” is the weak argument. 51 years ago, males in the United States were conscripted to fight a war in a country that had no meaning to those men. 51 years ago. If it is so meaningless, then why don’t women pass a law that requires themselves to sign up for the “meaningless draft”? And I don’t mean a draft that requires women to “join the military”. I’m talking a draft that says women will be forced to fight on the front line in an infantry. The vote is tied to force and bloodshed. It is immoral for a woman to decide that a male must fight on behalf of the country, while excluding themselves. It is immoral for a woman to vote on things of economy, laws of justice, and much more, as these can be tied to reasons for wars. Thousands of years of experience has taught us this, it is only recently in the Christian West that we have decided to allow women to participate in the vote without the consequences of bloodshed.
@@motherofbeagles8532 It in fact does. Only property owners that made above a certain amount of money. They were also men would be held responsible to back up with force if needed.
@@levibaer18 so draft women then. Other countries, like Israel, have mandatory service requirements. Serving our country isn't the threat that you may think it is.
@@motherofbeagles8532 Draft women to what? Support positions? Front line infantry? Studies have been done between all male units vs coed units and have been determined that coed units are significantly less efficient than all male units. Why should we draft women to the front lines to make the men that are in infantry less efficient? Israel has mandatory female conscription, but those females aren’t deployed to combat situations, and rightfully so. Still not the same.
BE CAREFUL! Remember this is just Pastor Joel’s opinion, not doctrine. I agree that his logic and reasoning makes sense, but we have to be careful not to add to the scripture on issues it is silent on (in this case, voting). We don’t want to become like the Pharisees and add to God’s law (which they also justified with reason and logic). Very dangerous!
I agree, but I don't think he was adding to scripture. I think he is explaining how to apply scripture. Also, it's my understanding that the Pharisees expected and required the people to do their additional man-made rules. Yeshua (aka Jesus) told the people to obey what they say, but not to do what they do. So I believe that Yeshua had an issue with the hypocrisy, not with the additional rules. 🤷🏾♀️ But, I also think that what Pastor Joel is saying is that if we follow scripture, then it naturally follows that women would not be voting in a biblically patriarchal Society.
@@NicoleCB you wrote: "...if we follow scripture, then it naturally follows that women would not be voting in a biblically patriarchal Society." I've posted and thought much about Judges 4 & 5 this week. Clearly Deborah was put over the people (men and women) of Israel to judge them. I'm sure that included punishments. Probably the death penalty at times. This was obviously before Jesus came. So I believe there is great significance in what Deborah (and Jael) did. To ignore them is to ignore what God can do through women. Now Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lappidoth, was judging Israel at that time. She used to sit under the palm tree of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in the hill country of Ephraim; and the sons of Israel went up to her for judgment. -excerpt Judges 4
@@8784-l3b i agree. I believe the transformed wife and one other person that I follow have addressed Deborah and her apparent leadership role as not being a reason for women to have authority over men. However, I did not understand their explanation. To me, it seems like YHVW has put women (maybe only prophetesses?) in authority over men, but He had Paul tell us not to let women teach or usurp authority over men. So I remain confused on the issue. I err on the side of caution and have stopped "teaching" men--whatever that means. I try very hard for any conversation I have to not to veer into too much explanation on my part. I also have decided that I would refuse leadership positions, if I were given one and men would be under me. And this presents tricky situations, so I'll just cross that bridge if I ever come to it.🤷🏾♀️
@@NicoleCB (Not addressing the leadership/authority stuff now.) Just some thoughts here, maybe they have some value. A Christian isn't supposed to just believe a teacher of scripture, regardless of gender. Now these people were more noble-minded ... examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so. -excerpt Acts 17 (regarding people of Berea) So these people had Paul and Silas teaching them in person, and they didn't just believe them without question. Because that would have been sinful. But I do not allow a woman to teach...And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a wrongdoer. -excerpt 1 Timothy 2 It seems Paul is playing the odds here. Unless there is a better explanation. There certainly are a great many men that are worse teachers than some women. There are deceived men for sure. So what is more important, the message or the messenger? The truth by a woman or a falsehood by a man? But since women can preach the gospel to anyone, which is the most important teaching/message of all, they will at times preach to unsaved men, which are of course deceived/ignorant. For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. -excerpt Revelation 19
@@NicoleCB The forbidding women teaching men thing is for the ministry only. Not about society as a whole. *Its not a two kingdom thing, but the context of 2 Timothy 2 and 3 is worship.
This may be controversial, but I think only people who have a positive tax contribution or have had a history of paying taxes should have a vote. If you are a burden rather than an asset - then maybe you shouldn’t have a say in the decisions. A child doesn’t get to make the rules of the household - it should be the ones sustaining and maintaining the house
I remember listening to a woman pastor preach about how you need to get off of social media and to never use it, because "sinners are sinning on it", on it. She didnt use that exact wording, but, basically, thats what she was saying. What she presented pandered to her own personal feelings, rather then the tremendous blessing that God has been able to use social media for. She was popular in the community and so, people would just flock to her, and so she could conveniently say that. After all, she had her community of friends. But what about the rest of us, who dont have the money to fit into religion? We use social media and the internet. God uses ti to help those of us that religion has rejected. Its like, "no, dont learn about what is going on in south Africa, and the spiritual revival and reformation that is happening the whole world. Just stay in a little box". I wonder how she thinks now, because of how much of the church submitted to the government with covid 19? I am reminded of Sarai and Abrahm. They had received a massage, a direct Word from Almighty God, about how they would conceive a child in their old age. Guess who went against that Word and said that, basically, "no, God has shut my womb, go sleep with Hagar instead". It was a woman, Sarai, and since Abrahm went along with it, we today, have the Israeli Arab conflict. Also, she lied about laughing in the presence of God and God made sure everybody knew what she had done. Abrahm bowed down himself in the presence of God, but Sarai lied in the presence of God. Yeah, what you are saying in the video, I whole heartedly believe, not just because of my personal held beliefs, but because the Bible shows us.
It’s actually more pertinent today than it ever was. We need course correction, as the voting process has become a massive race of who can conjure up the most votes of absolute trash Americans who don’t know the first thing about responsibly running ANYTHING at all. Cultural rot has destroyed the voter pool.
@ 5:50 "If only men could vote then there would not be a democrat president in the last 50 years" In fact if "If only men could vote" the democrat party would not be what it is now! The 'Overton window' wold not be a sliding scale towards the left. "The Overton window is the range of policies politically acceptable to the mainstream population at a given time.[1] It is also known as the window of discourse." Wikipedia
And what about the number of women voters who vote for the republican cause and Trump? I suppose they are being ruled by their emotions and not by logic? Makes sense to me.
@ellieholbrook4234 Show me one thing a woman can do that a man cannot do . Nothing except bearing children . WHO created women this way ? God . The one pagans call "abuser" , "control freak" and "misogynist" becuase it does not fit their Western Luciferian ideologies. A woman's worth from a biblical perspective is always connected to MAN Proverbs 31 Because God made the woman for the man . Nothing else. Women are not only useless but higly harmful when they're not where they belong anymore. End of the Western civilisation is near
I agree. This is super insulting. I also have a controversial thought- these guys are power hungry and they better be careful bc Satan is gonna take advantage of it
@@motherofbeagles8532 Yeah, those politicians, the 300 or so that run the country, who answer to corporate lobbyists. Remember there are over 100 million men in this country. Those politicians don't speak for us. And remember, most men would prefer to live simple lives, without worrying about wealth and resources. But we know that in order to please women, we have to become materialistic and fight and struggle to acquire resources, so that women can live their privileged lifestyles
@@motherofbeagles8532I love how when certain persons want to restrict women's voting rights because they're "emotional" and then someone asks who's responsible for the majority of wars and genocides in the world, suddenly the institutions and governments become non-binary 🤣.
Incontrovertible, the wicked idea that the head of household is unable to speak for his wife is a direct assault on the government of the family. Even if this were not the case, “you will know by the fruit” as you said pastor, this is the cause of great suffering in our day we must repent for the glory of God and the love of our communities!
The man should speak for his wife, and she has no voice in this? Treating the wife as if she has no mind, is that your ideal? Are women even human for you?
@@marcelschmidt1083 Yes, a Man should speak for his wife; because he know her and leads her in love as a follow image bearer of God. Do you think the government should speak for women? is that your ideal? Are women even Human to you?
imagine this: you are a woman who works in a coal mine. every day you risk being crushed, blown up from tnt, entrapped by rocks, and eventually will succumb to black lung as you were breathing in rock dust for years. BUT you did it anyway because you loved your husband and kids that much. you literally worked your life away so your family could live safe under a roof. then, all the men who for all of history have sat in shelter raising kids while being protected by women suddenly vote that you have to travel halfway across the world and sit in a ditch with no food or water. eventually you get trench foot, can’t even walk, then get shot in the stomach and lay with agonizing pain until you slowly lose consciousness. all because men thought that was the right decision.
women got the right to vote. one of the main reasons you vote is to decide on policy that dictates whether we send thousands of men to go and die protecting YOU. women got the right to vote without the responsibility of paying for your vote with death from the brutality of war! bottom line is you shouldn’t vote if your not ready to die defending the policies you’ve voted on.
@@LC-hv1qn doesn’t matter… natural rights are what had men dying for women in the first place. the issue is women demanding the right to vote when they have very little consequence for who or what they vote for. it has everything to do with women voting when their votes decide the fate of men. women could vote without having to face the repercussions and still do. send the women to the front lines for hundreds of years and soon you’ll find they vote against war and very conservatively
Right around 16:15 is where you get into what I have suspected for a long time, Joel. It makes sense that as a husband is leading his family in all other areas, that he would lead in the area of voting as well. This is why the culture (before the rise of the feminists) didn’t see it as anything abnormal. It’s not that they weren’t giving women the vote out of “hatred” for women, as we are now constantly being told.
Think of a school principal: he or she is making decisions on behalf of the entire school community: parents, children, teachers, other staff. These people may be consulted for valuable input, just as a husband is going to have the ear of his wife in the family setting. But ultimately, the school principal is the one making the decision and is then accountable for what happens as a result. The teacher/parent/student has not been given permission to make a decision on behalf of the entire school-unless delegated to by the principal.
Well, all men also didn't get the right to vote until recently as well though. The suffrage movement was more of a struggle by commoners against the nobles than a men vs women thing in reality.
100%! The extreme patriarchy is what drove extreme feminism. My grandma was abused and cheated on, so she voted Democrat. When men act godly and not self-righteous fine, until then, women need to protect ourselves.
I agree. If men are supposed to lead, that is a position that comes with more responsibility than rights. If men had been godly leaders loving their wives as Christ loved the church and treating women as sisters in Christ, women's lib would not have been necessary. My husband loves me. He would never seek to abuse, control, or deny me basic human rights like voting.
@@jaimesfolly Your husband loves you ..like Christ really ? "Whom I love I REBUKE and CHASTISE " Revelation chapter 3 Words spoken by CHRIST himself to a 1st century church who was going astray. You see what it looks like to "love like Christ" ? Love without discipline when necessary is not love at all. It's the adulterated vision of love preached from modern pulpits in bed with the Luciferian West . Wives , submit to your husband in everything Eph 5:25 Leading and protecting always implies control.
@@kendra9688 LOL What a monstrous lie ! Who screwed up everything when SHE took control in the garden of delights ? Patriarchy is God's way. " so she voted democrat" lol What an example ! Your grandma should be the one teaching younger women 7 points that have been suppressed by the post modern church , including the submission of their husbands in everything. Titus 2:4 is a JEWEL . Even old women are completely rotten today.
@@jaimesfolly No one leads and rules with just responsibilites. If men are to rule , then they also have the right to enforce their rule. Women's lib comes from the pit of hell.
What about the women who are not married? Sometimes it happens.They have to work and make their own decisions. I think that having the right to vote is a simple human right.As long as we live on this earth, we will want to vote. Have you ever thought about how many abuses women suffer, especially they are excluded from the society?
I don’t see women suffering when they receive divorce, alimony, and child support? I’m not seeing how women are suffering? And no women shouldn’t be allowed to vote because they are unstable in their emotions and logic.
@@cosmictreason2242 stay quiet in your little corner like you’re suppose to. You gave no right to take away rights of other human beings you can’t do that sorry. So stay in your lane and mind your business.
I actually grew up in a conservative catholic family and myself and my family we became more liberal as we got older. I’m 43 years old now and I am a progressive liberal as well as my husband who is from the same area as I am and grew up like I did and he’s also a USMC combat veteran. We have a 14 year old daughter and we teach our daughter to be independent where she would not need a man for anything until she chooses to at some point in her life. We also teach her to be accepting, and to be kind. But hey, that’s just us.
@@justchilling704 Really ? Where does the daughter "choose" to marry in the Bible ? Please reconsider what Paul said . Those parents are just teaching their own daughter to do as she pleases and wants , which is 100% unscriptural. It is in fact demonic to say the least. Women's so-called independance has led the West to where it is now. It is abominable and against God's design. God made the woman for the man. Not for herself !!! Totaly useless and harmful. Women living for themselves are the greatest nightmare of our post modern societies. We will then hypocritically wonder why the birth rate is so low.
That wasn’t my point. My point is not whether women should vote given the current lay of the land. My point was simply whether women should be allowed to vote in an ideal society.
As long as you have the ability to vote, so does the feminist, and we need to cancel that vote out by voting opposite of it. PLEASE don’t stop voting for pro-life candidates.
Handmaids Tale is cozying up to the fundies. Women pay taxes alongside men and work. This isn't going to change. And if America came to be because taxation without representation was an affront to the people, why is it not an affront to Christian men? The argument that women are easily decieved doesn't work if you lack the intellectual honesty to explain which gender bares more responsibility for war and violent crimes.😊
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
There are so many female world-leaders! Women are or have been the heads of countries all around the globe including; the UK, Germany, Norway, Finland, Iceland, NZ, Singapore, Taiwan, Barbados, Greece, Trinidad & Tobago, and plenty more. It’s a terrible shame that you don’t see Christian women and girls as capable of equal feats. Your poor daughters…
@@cosmictreason2242 Oh hi. The "monstrous regiment of women" ... countries lead by women have the most powerful economies in Europe and best quality of life; highest GDP, life expectancy, social support, trust over corruption, and freedom. Dozens of female world-leaders do work of more complexity and higher consequence every day than you probably will in your entire life. Why don't you think American Christian girls are capable of equal feats?? You're actively hobbling your own daughters...
@@cosmictreason2242 Wow. “fake news” What a rebuttal. Everything I said is wholly factual and I encourage you to research it for yourself. Don’t let your personal ignorance stunt the potential of your daughters.
@@akadwriter Not biblical ? So if the husband votes A and the wife votes B , who introduces division int the household ? Who GOD gave the rule out there ? See what happens when women rule Isaiah 3:12 ? It's a curse. A curse allowed from God . A curse upon us proud Westerners who have spitted on God's word and are now reaping the worst.
As a boomer feminist until God caused me to be born-again 38 years ago, my life was chaotic and I was in bondage as I made very bad decisions (sin). Now as a Christian wife being under my husband's authority I have peace and TRUE freedom. There is no freedom in women's liberation. Just the thought of women voting is very disturbing to my spirit and has been for years. Your message, Pastor Joel, was confirmation that God has me on the narrow path. May Christ be praised! Thank you.
@@DeborahPinkowski I’m also thankful to Christ for all the freedoms. I’m also thankful that ppl like you aren’t allowed to decide who has basic rights.
@emekao502 I would suggest you to study the scripture with an open heart and leave your earthly notions aside and you'll see the truth in there as well. Be blessed by the Grace of God, I wish all the best for you. ❤
@smallparticlelinda He ate it because he followed her , he hearkened to her voice , he submitted. You understand now how wicked modern teachers are when they preach the lie of "mutual submission" in marriage ? Adam was the first one who experimented this submission at his own expense and at the expense of their own well being . They both lost the paradise.
@@framboise595 yes, he ate it because he failed to provide protection when Eve was under temptation AND he failed to exercise judgement when his wife brought him the fruit. If he had brought her to God and repented together when she presented the fruit to him, humanity would've gone done a very different path. As a priest once said, humanity fell because Adam ate the fruit, not Eve, as the covenant was made with Adam. In the ideal Christian world, the man would be responsible, and the woman would submit to his opinion, trusting that his judgement would be good for her, family and society. However, the reality of today's world is far from that. Many men are selfish and oppressive as head of the house. They think having authority makes them king instead of servant. They don't know how to serve while demanding to be served just because they're the head. Another reality is that, not everyone in this world is Christian and hold the same Christian values. Even Moses had to allow divorce even though divorce isn't God's plan for humanity at all. Legislation should be a balance of the real and ideal.
@@smallparticlelinda He ate it because he followed her into sin as do countless men because they let women usurp their authority in the home. She would not submit to his "opinion" only but in everything as the Bible says. Everything includes his own needs , his own sexual desires etc... Men are always served first in the Bible because the woman was made for and because of the man . Not the man for the woman. Men are oppressive today ? In our feminised hell ? In this Western world where we make it all about the woman and her irrational whims ? Men are controlled by their wives , in and out of the bedroom. Wives are not submissive at all as GOD commanded. Men LET their wives be in control , they let their wives redefine everything according to their whims and feelings. God 's will for marriage and for sex is baffled all the time. As a result , God rewards them with a "sexless marriage" (oxymoron). Men today are like Adam : God tells them something, their wife says contrary to God , and men follow their wives. The most striking example is this one : God tells men to get married to have their sexual urges met . Rebellious wife says "no means no" , now plenty of men say that marriage does not guarantee sex anymore. They follow their wives into LIES , dishonouring God's institution of marriage. Like their wives , they say the opposite of what GOD says and wants. Marriage is not done God's way anymore among those who claim to serve the Lord. It is done the WOMAN's way. That's why it is such a mess and a disaster.
The bell curve average of men's iq on a graph is higher than that of a woman's. Men are smarter than women and think more logically. Whereas women think more emotionally.
@@JW-tg1nn If you love Jesus , you love men first since man is the glory of God. And you love women because of men and what men need and can find in women. This order is wonderful . But isolating women from men and caring just for women is horrendous. Men don't envy women .They keep their own place. Only women envy men and are never satisfied with the place they have been given. Man's ego images God's ego in many ways. His ego is not always sinful contrary to what we are told in pulpits today.
@@JW-tg1nn The truth of the gospel is mocking God's creational order and have women rule over men ? There is no "gospel" when the Lord is intentionally mocked as he is today. Telling people that Jesus died for their sins but whatever the Lord says or commands does not matter is pure blasphemy. Making it all about "grace" and nothing else is blasphemous. Christ told them to go make DISCIPLES of all nations . Not just people who will "accept" him .
@@JW-tg1nn I know we don't clean ourselves and then come to Christ. But the problem today is , we come to Christ and that's it. We don't preach what is written at all or we twist it to the max to tailor it to the Luciferian feminist spirit that is plaguing the West. By making it all about women as the post modern church does , we do mock God's order . We preach some kind of cross theology , which is an abomination . There is nothing more male-centric than the Bible but by some kind of sorcery , we are taught exacerbated gynocentrism all the time.
@@JW-tg1nn Weird male/female heresy ? That's how you call God's order of creation ? No. If we women were created in his image , the church would not be portrayed as a wife . We as women image God's people , ie what is under . Man (husband) images God/Christ , ie what is above The masculine , in essence is divine but the feminine is earthly and carnal (not derogatory ). The masculine did not exist when Adam was created. It existed in God before Adam. However , the feminine started to exist after Adam , for him and because of him. It's a very beautiful reality and no God-fearing woman can be envious of this position. She delights in hers because she has the glorious ability to bear children , something always praised in the Bible.
Your initial reasoning, that essentially women have suffered by being permitted to vote, is pragmatic. I'd argue that pragmatism is an insidious standard for questions of morality and rights. If we apply a pragmatic standard to other rights, then practically all our rights could, and should be infringed upon. Furthermore, the argument that Eve was deceived and not Adam is true, but Adam passed the buck, and refused to take responsibility for his lack of leadership. So, it may be that woman are deceived in voting, but also, men can't be trusted to lead. You speak of Timothy, and "weak willed women". I must ask, is Timothy saying all women are weak willed? What about redeemed women, those indwelt by the Holy Spirit, who are being sanctified? Is not Gods work, sufficient for fallen women? If women should not vote, because they're easily deceived, and you say experience and Scripture attest to this proclivity for women to be deceived, would not Scripture, and experience say that men have a proclivity to be tyrants, murderous tyrants, and therefore ought not lead? And cannot men be weak willed too? Can anyone say, David? You may say, but the Bible says explicitly men are to lead. This is true, but it doesn't say women are not to vote, and applying the teaching that women should not have authority over a man, to voting, is a stretch. IT would seem, to me at least, that being easily deceived is not the only trait which can cause suffering...but I now argue pragmatically. Is not the answer for women who are easily deceived, salvation....the Gospel....and even dare I say, men teaching? If bent, disqualifies you from something, should not all of us, be disqualified, for all things? It seems to me common grace, and redemption are being ignored...and the applying of commands, outside their clear intentions. If women should not vote because they're easily deceived, then young men should not vote because they're easily manipulated...which of course begs the question, what qualifies for a young man? Is this standard, true for all times and all places? Is a 18 year old today, the same as an 18 year old in 1776? Are all 18 year olds the same? In some ways, this line of reasoning, is almost, Marxist....disregarding the individual, and instead, lumping all into groups. Anyway, that's my .20 cents (to account for inflation)....
@@cosmictreason2242 I don't see how arguing woman not being permitted to vote, will cause less suffering, isn't pragmatic. Furthermore, the context of Paul not permitting a woman to teach A MAN, appears to be in the context of the church, not the state, or any other sphere. And anyway, is voting, leading? I'd argue if it is, then there are many more things women should not be permitted to do....such as be doctors.. The Proverbs woman, in Psalms 31, seems to take on an awful lot of responsibility, and such that in facts "leads" her family....at least no less then voting would lead. I think saying a woman can't vote, is adding to Scripture....
@@seesomethingsaysomething2814 it’s not pragmatic because the reason they’re not permitted to vote is that the Bible forbids it. No pragmatic argument has been made. Bible says they can’t, so they can’t.
As a church leader myself in a Pentecostal church I came to challange my elder addressing him on all these verses about gender roles and he disagreed with how the bible reads and says that since women have the Holy Ghost in them then they are capable of being Christlike and do they can do what men do and gender roles are no more. How would you think of this and considering no church will agree with you on everything, should I consider this grounds for leaving the church? I came out of homeless meth addiction and 6 years later am a business owner and middle class. Dozens of friends failed around me because they wouldn’t submit to scripture. I love Jesus and his word and I believe I succeeded because anything that doesn’t align with scripture I reject so btw I believe highly you are right about these things and wouldn’t change my mind about. My spirits fully convinced.
I have rarely met a pentecostal that loves the Word of God, so this is refreshing. Keep seeking answers in His Word. Not trying to fight you, I am only saying that if you follow the Word, and turn away from the deceit of those who say they love God but hate (not emotionally, but in actuality) His Word, He will lead you to a good place where false doctrines and poor decisions resulting from them can die out, and you will be free to obey in the joy of righteousness. As you have already found out the the Bible IS the word of the Holy Spirit inscripted and inerrant, infallible and completely breathed out by God through men sustained to write with clarity exactly how God worded it through them. You are on a good and holy path; follow it to the outcome of life.
@@craigchambers4183 I like this, sir. I'm glad I read this comment. I have been in a Pentecostal Church for half of my life. I recently been shunned without explanation, and I believe it is because I was seeking reconciliation between what I was hearing from the pulpit and what was actually written in Scripture. Without feedback from any church members I cannot say whether or not my attitude or tone or approach was godly or not. There may be more Pentecostals than you think who love the word of God. I think the reason we are still in it is because of spiritual abuse. Some of us are told we will go to hell if we do not obey the pastor. This is cult-like. So, I really like what you wrote, because it's very encouraging for me to continue to seek a true church. Thank you.
I'm in a Pentecostal Church too and I have asked many questions. I'm now seeking another church. As I continue to listen to Pastor Joel and others like him it really really bothers me to see women in Authority positions. Recently one of the churches I was thinking about attending had a woman preach on Sunday morning. I was very upset. I wondered what I would have done had I been there. Would I have gotten up and walked out? And I don't feel comfortable going for another reason. I don't want a woman laying hands on me and praying over me during the corporate service. I think this is for obvious reasons, right? But it leads to another issue. The men in the church are allowing women to pray over people and lay hands on them during corporate service. So not only are the women in error, but so are the men for allowing it! I don't think it's wise to allow men who are disobeying God's divine order to pray over me. They probably should not teach me either. They shouldn't have any authority in my spiritual life, right? So these are the questions that go through my mind as I find it hard to leave my church cold turkey.
Men could be as you describe but how many truely Godly men exist today? I don’t see the quality in many. If there were maybe women could accept losing the vote. I just can’t see His enemies becoming His footstool in anything like any future I can see (which isn’t my place to see anyway). And I’ve tried to volunteer to help others (even to dig a ditch) and I’m turned down - which I used to do but now realize that was my error.
@SteffanRhoads "how many truely Godly men exist today? I don’t see the quality in many. If there were maybe women could accept losing the vote." Lol As if feminists in Christian guise cared for godly men at all ! Women in essence are further from God than men are. 1 Co 11 clearly says that MAN is the glory of God but the woman is just the glory of man. Don't expect anything good coming from women raised to tjink that the world revolves around their asses. Nothing worse than the post modern Western woman.
Before watching in answer to your question... no. After watching 31 seconds I see we agree. Now I'll enjoy the rest of the video. God bless you brother Joel
This is the most logical, realistic, sensical conversation about women's rights I've ever heard. I have always had a problem with women being allowed to vote and couldn't quite articulate it. This is an excellent conversation about this subject. Thank you
Pastor Joel! They make soft attachments that go behind your ears to grip and keep your glasses up on your nose. They are a serious lifesaver! Thought I'd let you know because I'm a fellow glasses wearer that hates pushing his glasses back up.
@@nerychristian What if I told you I became a woman and stand with feminists to abolish this patriarchy that also harms men. Yeah I became a woman bish
Thank you for the video! I was wondering if this means for your church, do women members vote when it comes to congregational decisions? I would assume no. If they do get their own vote I would love an explanation of the difference! Thank you.
@amandasathos1 If women vote when it comes to congregational decisions , assuming there are more women than men , then it means that the church is given a feminine direction , which is contrary to God's will at its highest. I never see ONE woman having a voice among the male disciples in the Bible. Man was made first , woman second and as such , men must be singled out all the time. Women must be followers , not deciders.
@@jimmyjames8164 Oh ok. I disagree with almost all of you on most things with the exception of like abortion, lbgt not being acceptable in church (and I agree that CRT isn't scriptural but I dont buy that injustices haven't occurred since the end of jim crow to the modern era), I just wanted to like understand where people are coming from. God Bless.
Pastor Joel, I am curious as to what you think may be needed in order to end this as you said you believe will happen. Given the ramifications of returning society closer to God's intention for it, I obviously would love to see this. That being said, even among the more Biblically sound churches ( mine openly defends male headship ), there seems to be a blind spot here. You have the wives of staff members being housewives and yet these same male staff members will support female political candidates. They will say you can't find the idea that women aren't intended to do such things in Scripture. Obviously, I point out that when God instituted family....he established it with the husband as the head. When he instituted government...he did so with the Patriarchs and Kings. When he created the church...the Pastors and Apostles were men. So, right from their origins, the 3 pillars of society....family, church and government were created in a patriarchal model. So, what is likely to be needed to turn things back to that model ? Women dying in combat in large numbers ? Interested in your views. God bless.
Just the gradual victory of this point of view, as with anti abortion, over decades as the cultural assumptions change, leading to political change. Just multiply and witness
@@JW-tg1nn Women voting totally destabilises the very patriarchal model the 3 pillars of society were created in. Can anyone find anything more male-centric than God's word ? It's just impossible.
Yes voting age should be raised as well more stringent requirements for being eligible to vote. Linking it to draft status makes sense in a very obscure and almost abstract way, because the vast majority of the population has never even experienced a draft in their lifetime. It doesn’t have the weight as a motivator that it once did.
Praise the Lord this is so helpful and SO refreshing to hear a biblical teacher not afraid to preach the truth despite controversy! I never considered this! My childhood education consisted of celebrating woman's right to vote and no wonder I was so easily brainwashed into celebrating it too! So refreshing to hear from Pastor Joel who takes the Bible seriously by God's grace alone. Very thankful for God's gracious works through you Pastor Joel! Grace and peace to you!
Adam was not deceived? He was deceived by Eve, don't you think? He went with Eve instead of God. We're talking God here! That's not heinous? This guy is Stephen Anderson without all the external wack job accoutrements. Men are "designed" to make decisions for others? Makes me glad I'm single. No chubby cheeked vermin here taking up my precious time here.
According to the OT law, elder widows with no hope of remarriage (60or older, and additional qualifications are given in scripture) can advocate for their own interests
Given that women CAN vote currently (whether or not they, or anyone, should [i.e. democracy not being a biblical system of government]) which would be more faithful in our day: a woman taking direction from her father or husband on how to vote thereby increasing political influence of that faithful family, or a woman not voting because they "shouldn't?" Great video as always.
@Corey Logan, this was my question too. I have been convinced for a while that women shouldn’t vote, but I thought that since I have the privilege, I should use it to magnify my husband’s vote. Pastor Joel what do you say?
@@kaylar3197 think long term instead of pragmatically. The right answer is to refuse. But for the pragmatist, i offer: if no conservative women vote, the Republican Party will stop pandering to women and moving further left, and will become more conservative, OR they will lose elections because conservative men are outnumbered, so the gop moves left, leaving room for a true conservative alternative to take its place
@Cosmic Treason Thanks for the reply. I don’t understand the contrast between long term and pragmatic. Pragmatic would usually be contrasted with principled truth (or idealistic), and this seems to be what you mean. I am I right? To your pragmatic argument, if I am voting to magnify my husbands vote, being lead by him, how am I encouraging the Republican Party to pander to women? I am no longer voting as a woman but as my husband’s echo.
Before clicking on this video, I expected to me mad and angered by what you would say. But after watching, I cant help but laugh at the fact that your world view is not only unimplemented in todays society, but that the myth of Christianity is continuing to decline and fade away. I picture you seething at the current and future state of society and I feel great joy. Stay mad.
Only men are required to register for selective service which the president calls for. Anyone saying women should vote but shouldn’t be drafted are basically saying that women should be able to vote men into war. Not to mention majority of taxes are paid by men, DESPITE women having the majority vote. These exact problems are what have led America to it’s demise today. It’s not even necessarily women voting, it’s that women have way less responsibility but have majority power.
“Consider the cost”. All the costs, of course. Most importantly, the medium and long term consequences for “any and all actions we take”. Women, as a rule, and liberals (think liberalism as a mental disorder) are emotional (illogical) and very, very short term thinkers. It is what it is. With love
The first time I heard this was not too long ago from The Tansformed Wife. I was shocked. I had no idea that there were people in this country who did not want women to vote. After reading through the comments on her Instagram post I could understand this point of view. And then I was excited to hear this discussed in one of Pastor Joel's interviews with two other male leaders. I don't remember their names. And each of these three men had varying perspectives on their preference for male and household votes. I appreciate this video here today. Here's my question. Everything makes sense except for the idea that women make poor voting decisions. If this is true, then it's probably because they're voting with their emotions which is not a rational way to make any decision whatsoever and they may also not be educated on politics. In my case, I am not very educated on politics, but I'm cerebral and have strong logic and critical thinking skills. I'm not weak willed. One of the reasons I've refrained from voting is because I know that I am not educated enough on the issues to make a well thought-out decision. I say this to show that I am not offended by the idea of losing my right to vote. However, I am frightened by the idea of votes for men only. If the only voters were saved believers walking blameless in the ways of the Lord, then I would feel absolutely confident in leaving votes to those particular men. If husbands love their wives as scripture commands, the natural result would be that they could and would make decisions in consideration of the well-being of their wives and daughters who hopefully would become wives in the future. But these curcumstances don't exist at-large. Most men are not following YHVW, and I don't know if most husbands who are true saved believers are mature in their walk and understandin of biblical love. Do they make decisions for their household in consideration for the well-being of the women and girls they may be trying to love in the way that scripture commands them to love? Or do they make decisions to bolster their ego and in preference for the other men and boys in the household? (Note: By well being I don't mean giving women and girls whatever they want.) I'll never forget that Abigail Adams reminded her husband, John Adams, who was one of the first presidents of the US, to remember the women.
Hi Nicole, I follow the Transformed wife on IG too! 👋😀 I understand why this would frighten you, but here are a couple things that came to my mind as I thought about it. This is unlikely to happen without a nation-wide repentance that make our country re-evaluate our whole system by scriptural principles. I think you can see why that would help. Second, most of the reasoning Joel presented here was not even based on whether the man was Christian. It was creational-just how men are in comparison to women. So yes, wicked men may vote and lead wrongly and mess things up, but women leading (voting) is a symptom of societal collapse on a massive scale. And lastly is the same argument for submitting to an imperfect husband. Will he always make the right choices? No. But he is the authority that God has given you, and (barring the exceptions) we should not overturn that order because we think we can do better.
@@kaylar3197 hello👋🏼😊 I thought about all this like you did. But regardless of how likely this could happen, the principles/ideologies make me uneasy. First of all, it's scary that women can't think logically or become educated about important subject matters. I can't believe these are biological designs by YHVW because it is disordered thinking and a limited capacity to learn. Why would the Gid of order design a disordered and small mind? It must be a result of how girls are being raised. Second, was the suffrage movenent because women's voices weren't being heard every once in awhile or most of the time? If women arent bring protected and cared for by men, then it leaves them neglected. Neglect is grounds for divorce or separation (I cant remember which.) per "old" testament. What would be a parallel yor addressing the problem of men not voting in favor of the protections and care of women and girls?
Nicole, honest challenge: do you also think abortion should only be outlawed if the majority of people who get pregnant are Christian? Obviously my conclusion is that that’s not relevant in the slightest, and it is, respectfully, without an ounce of misogyny, a great example of how your reasoning is emotional and why you’re not fit to judge matters in the realm of politics. I recognize you from this page and we’re both supporters and have no history of conflict. I hope you’ll be thick skinned enough to take my words at face value without registering offense. Frankly the fact I have to soften what I’m saying just underscores my point, as it is a typically gynocentric response to feel attacked when spoken to critically. Please reread my comment and take it in
@@cosmictreason2242 hi. Yes, I recognize you. Sir/brother, you didn't "have" to soften your response for me. I was delighted to receive a critique to what I wrote. It's one of the best ways for me to learn. In fact, I was and am always delighted when someone will engage with me in dialectics. I'm happy when someone is able to point out gaps and flaws in my logic, so that I can get rid of them. If you can speak to me without fear of hurting my feelings, then let's continue. If you're going to continue to temper your speech because you don't want me to break down into tears or fly into a rage, then so be it. I understand why you may think you need to do that and I'll bear the coddling speech. That said, I want to think about the first part of your argument because it made me pause to think. My initial thoughts about your abortion analogy is that it's not rational; but again, give me some time to think about it. In the meantime, I'd like to know how you came to the conclusions you made in the rest of your argument. I'm curious to know which emotions are you sensing from what I've been writing? Which emotion have I expressed that affirms the need to temper your approach with me as though I were the typical woman you may have tried to engage in dialectics? Why assume that I am the typical person that easily gets offended and refuses to take into consideration opposing ideas that are new and challenging? I wonder if you even read my comment thoroughly and more than once. Did you read the part where I said that I essentially disqualify myself from voting because of my lack of knowledge and understanding of politics? If you read my own self critique against my ability to reason out politics, then why would you say that I'm not fit to judge in the realm of politics? What part of what I wrote was a judgment in the realm of politics? Feel free to let me know if this response is an emotional one as well.
@@cosmictreason2242 RE: ". . . do you also think abortion should only be outlawed if the majority of people who get pregnant are Christian? Obviously my conclusion is that that's not relevant in the slightest. . ." I don't know how to respond to this because I'm having a hard time tying it back to my original comment. Could you make your point in a different way? Could you just state your point directly? Also, I'm new to this channel and a lot of the ideas are new to me and shocking. I'm still learning, including the theological terms. And I don't have the same religious background. So please don't think that I will obviously understand. In fact, I'm still on the fence line about abortion; so my lack of certainty on that issue is distracting me from following your reasoning.
Revoking women's right to vote would be the quickest way to make righteous changes in our country. Many problems would be resolved in a few short years. I'll go on to say that voting should be as it once was only those who own land or I'll add, own a business should vote. And only those over 28, 30 should be voting. or only those with 4 year degrees should be allowed to vote. Point is to get the wise and knowledgeable to vote or run the country, not fools.
@@JW-tg1nn The Gospel itself is no answer to the mess we're living in if the Western world doesn't quickly go back to gender roles as taught in scripture.
@@JW-tg1nn The Gospel is not the answer if the whole counsel of God is not taught anymore. I'm not talking about the "law" but about God's order that is being baffled by so-called Christians today. It is WOMEN who are running the show among those who preach the so-called gospel. So whats difference does it make with Isaiah 3:12 ? Why on earth aren't wives told submission in everything as the BIBLE teaches in every marital instruction ? Those who claim to preach the " gospel" arrange for delivering abominable female-centric marriage sermons , they preach as if men and women were equal , as if there was no hierachy between the sexes , as if women existed just side by side with men ..for absolutely nothing. No truth told about OUR origins. About God's design for man and for womanright from the start. But they say that the "gospel" is going to be a game changer ? Who are they kidding? NOTHING changes because God's gender roles are baffled. The "gospel" today is a sad joke.
Taken from a website (so not original by me) In our day and age, there are many who want to drive the name and message of Christ completely out of the public arena. Voting is an opportunity to promote, protect, and preserve godly government. Passing up that opportunity means letting those who would denigrate the name of Christ have their way in our lives. The leaders we elect-or do nothing to remove-have great influence on our freedoms. They can choose to protect our first amendment right to religious freedom and the right to spread the gospel, or they can restrict those rights. They can lead our nation toward righteousness or toward moral disaster.
People like this say women are more easily decieved than men. This guy seems easily deceived just because he believes that the story of Adam and Eve is the literal truth. He probably also believes the same about Noah's ark. If he had a valid point about women not being allowed to vote, then maybe I'd listen. As it is, I'll stay on the side of logic.
You realize that if that’s how it worked, and people who served got the vote, tax payers got to vote, and land owners got to vote that the vast majority of voters would be men? I think the issue is women have the majority vote with significantly less skin in the game
@@1OnlyGot7 I looked this up and it seems that males make up 49.3% of the US population and women make up 50.7%. So yes, women are a very small majority - less than 1%. Of course I realize that if those 3 groups were the only ones allowed to vote then more men than women would be eligible, but we don't have that system. It seems like the argument that is being made here is that because men are more likely to serve in the military, then women shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's why I asked specifically about those women who have served. Your argument seems to be a little different, but also confusing because it depends on what you mean by skin in the game. We are all invested in the future of our country. Some of us don't bring as much to the table at the beginning, but that doesn't mean that we don't care about the future. Women are affected by elections just as much as men.
@@snowmonster42 Do 1 of these 3 to vote: 1. register or serve 2. Pay taxes 3. Own a home. That’s skin in the game. And anyone on welfare shouldn’t have the right to vote until they get off it. Yea the policies effect them but they aren’t moving the economy/defending the country, they shouldn’t have the same power as people who pay into the system. The reason why feminists hate this is that women lose the majority vote
Signs of modern day Pharisees: You spend more time talking about what you are against, not what you are for. Pharisees love to argue. They love to spend their time convincing others that they are wrong. If they had to list the actions and issues they are against, the pencil would run out of lead. But turn around and ask them to list what they are for, and the pencil would not even have to be resharpened. Pharisees believe their job is to defend God and legislate morality. So they are against drinking, smoking, cursing, short skirts, talking back to parents, holding hands before marriage and so on. And all of these things come before the gospel. Or maybe they are the gospel. Modern-day Pharisees can’t tell the difference
And of course I’m triggered and saddened by a man telling women they should have their right to vote taken away. Women died, actually sacrificed their lives for the right to vote. Jesus upheld women and God is love. All this channel is about is commendation and control… the Holy Spirit convicts… and Jesus has saved us. That is what should be preached. The Gospel. Plain and simple. Not ways to subjugate and control women by men who believe that women are nothing more than servers of men. So glad I’m not American. A lot of you guys have totally altered the gospel to fit your own needs and desires, many of which are about condemning women. Disgraceful.
