Simon Jordan CLASHES With Stefan Borson Over Chelsea's New FFP 'Loophole' 😱🔥 

There's a reason why Behdad Eghbali manages $75 billion in assets under management and this bloke is still on TalkSport😂

Chelsea found another one lmfao. That club is a different breed man, I swear. 😂

Breaking news: Stefan Borson and Simon Jordan didn’t clash on TalkSport about Chelsea

😂...Loopholes are legal. FFP should have better lawyers.

Yet another Clickbait title from TS, No CLASH at all in fact they pretty much agreed with each other.

What's embarrassing is talkSPORT, worth tens of millions, can't upload a video that doesn't have sound issues.

Just think if this was Newcastles Saudi owners. Would be the top story on SkySports. I dont blame Chelsea but I despise the hypocrisy of the media.

This guy was fear mongering for months. Bohley has the last laugh, again!

Boehly absolutely putting this "FFP Expert" in his place. Theres levels to this.

Stefan reminds me of a Hobbit from lord of the rings

Every day this Man city man will come here to discuss Chelsea

A club's most important people 1. Finance Director 2. Director of Football

Loopholes aside, Stefan has the biggest ears I have ever seen.

I'm so bored of FFP, they should have capped players salaries 25 years ago when they started going crazy.

Where was the clash? It seemed like a pretty nice conversation...

This Borson robot is glitching the hell out trying to mentally juggle how Chelsea have got away with it

How can a so-called FFP expert not even know his own rules😂😂🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️.

And everyone knocked Ken Bates for building our two hotels…nice one Ken

Where was the clash!? 🤣

Talksport still havent realised the robotic voices on their videos

Save your tears for our next loophole 😂

FFP isn't designed for the big clubs, just a smokescreen

This fella wakes up in cold sweats over Boehly’s loopholes 😂😂

What the F is up with 5 bots commenting utter tripe within a minute of the video going live...

Where was the clash?

What’s wrong with the video and sound?

Can you sort out the audio? My god

If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it must be baked into your thinking.

Simple fix. Wage caps and transfer caps. Demand UEFA implement both across all European leagues in order to participate

Curious if the delay is maybe tied to the agreement Boehly and Co made preventing them from selling Chelsea for a set period of time ? Also unbelievably poor from the PL if they couldn't anticipate related party sales or in fact the other valuation issues football has had of late like the pjanic and arthur swap deal .

Question,: was Borson employed at City when they violated FFP. Is this sorta the fox in the hen house?

Some clash that lads!

Where was this clash? Not here.

Spirit of the rules? Funniest phrase ever when you mention it in reference to ffp.

So can the Newcastle owners start flipping properties under Newcastle on the side.

This mean our owners could sell the area right next to St James Park they bought

That’s ridiculous..so let’s sell a player to ourselves and say we didn’t violate the PSR rules…

When business sense meets punditry! Pundits get clueless but still claim they're right

My favorite part was where they clashed.

And cue the torrent of clubs selling everything they own to themselves. Marinakis should sell The City Ground to his shipping company for £500m .

looking like a young martin o neil in the thumbnail

Their should be a rule that these owners cannot sell of buildings and certain assets of the club... i.e training grounds,stadiums etc that belongs to the clubs!

I don't know what's worse for football, FFP or VAR Its all shite.

There's only so many times they can play this trick... Rules will change before they're caught out properly

Cant argue if it's within the rules, just clever accounting

Then newcastle should do this

Love when Jim flings in wee comments like iv been to both hotels lol. Who with Jim?

I can see everton getting a points deduction off the back of this.

Wow. What a clash.

Ah, good to see Bilbo Baggins is still getting his airtime.

Still waiting for the part where they ‘clash’ 🙄

1:03 Simons cheshire cat smile

so if the rule book says they have to get approval in 10 days and haven't why haven't they been charged with breaking premier league rules? the biggest issue with all this inc the Everton situation etc seems to be a consistency of approach.

It wasn't 100 million that Real Madrid sold their piece of land for Simon it was 500 million

Good for Chelsea. FFP is killing football. Imagine being forced to sell home grown players to keep the peace. Makes no sense. Demonizing the wrong entities. Good for Chelsea

This fella is a city fan. I’d like to see him cover the city case with the same energy he has for Everton, forest and Chelsea…..

Chelsea do no wrong in working around ffp . let it go Borson .

Stefan Chelsea might break ffp in 33/34 you helmet 🤦🏻‍♂️

Sold the assets but kept the income stream - sounds like it can be challenged on the basis of an "arm's length transaction", or whether the fair market value is justified if the buyer's sold the income rights. Just like in F1, these FFP rules will end up with who's got the best accounting team

Stefan Borson is an asbsolute spoofer and chancer extraordinaire. You can see why City got rid

FFP is designed to limit smaller clubs and prevent the hegemony of the big clubs being threatened. It's no surprise that the Big Six are immune from meaningful consequence while other clubs lose points. That's the entire point of it.

Where was the clash bw the 2 guys???

I can barely work out my payslip every week how people deal with this week to week lol

"Clever accountancy" when it's Chelsea but a "serious breach" when it's Everton! Utterly pathetic.

Surly another person or body interfering in a ltd company is classed as shadow directing and that is illegal. When banks or other institutions tell you to dell an asset for example for them to benefit that is shadow directing and if you warn them about it they back off. Only an official receiver, insolvency practitioner can do this for the benefit of all creditors.

I think this transaction is fine. The properties are valued at that price £77 mil. The club's value will lower now they aren't on the books anymore. If they sold the property anywhere else they'd get £77 mil. They have transferred ownership rights at market value to a different company even if that company has the same owners . What would be worse if they transferred the ownership for £0 as that is devaluing the club for free. If they ever come to sell the club, the club is now valued £77mill less and the company that owns the property is now valued £77 mil more.

Somewhere there is a football match being played. Remember that, Football?!

I really like the way stefan made it simple to understand FFP finance for those who dont have finance knowledge.

Did I miss the clash?

chelsea is a bit ahead of the premier league with the hotels and 8 year contracts

What a discrace if this is allowed to happen!

Disagree if a club owned a 100-acre site, leased it out, built on it, then sold it between legal entities, it was above board. Colloquial feelings aside.

They charged Everton because they (the PL) want them gone. Simple as that. Different rules for different clubs.

Don't hate the player, hate the game...

presumably the holding co could gift the property at nil value back to the operating company, and then sell it back again, repeatedly year after year?

On the last point about commercial rationale - every big company has its own real estate department for this reason. Tesco etc have a company that buy all the land and sell it as speciality , also Goldstein is more senior in that company than the main Chelsea one and he is a property specialist in London so they will get rationale . Stefan clutching at straws

I wouldn't call this a clash 😂

"Clash 😱🔥" ok talksport

at what point did they "CLASH"

Lol...the headline is very misleading. They didn't CLASH at all

Audio is fucked once again Talksport sort it out

I hope so🤞

I detest Cheatski with a passion... But this move has made me laugh... In one move they have made a mockery and laughing stock of the PL and in this very same move they have just obliterated the notions of FPS actually being a thing.. Haha... The PL are fools and Cheatski have just proven it...

If you don't want people to exploit loopholes, seal them

It was the Spanish government who bought that piece of land from Real Madrid and paid whatever it was £150m when it was worth £7 so don’t just accuse English clubs of corruption

I disagree that PSR & FFP is disadvantageous to English football, as long it’s implemented properly and promptly… and I was thinking Real Madrid and car park or training ground or waste land

I love these Chelsea owners. From a business perspective these guys are so fuxking creative it’s quite impressive. The sold the company to generate a sudden large profit yet they hold on to the revenue stream by giving themselves a management contract.

The PL has the money to resource better council but they obviously would rather keep as much profit as possible.

Cheating on the pitch has now been equaled by the cheating off the pitch.

23/24 80m player sales (mount) 80m less in wages 24/25 Hall 28m, maatsen 35m pure profit, lukaku (break even) 40m, kepa (break even) 10m Broja 15m, trevoh 25m (pure profit), conor 35m Wages are lower, next year 25/26 they will sell santos, d Fofana, angelo, some youth players.. and have cwc another 60m Roman has done this 15 years, and people are still surprised??

EPL has picked a fight at the behest of 3 clubs that they can't win, now the 3 clubs want it changed because it is stopping them from competing.

Did….did they clash? 😂

Simon Jordan is like David Brent in that training episode telling the trainer he's right and talking over him, can't handle a money expert being more of an expert in the room

i dont see any of the top 6 teams that run the league ever getting points deductions as probly just get fines

They WANT the PL to challenge the “loophole”. The cases were Blueco. Were promised a certain percentage of extra consideration has been dragging on being alotted to them, and there are non-supportive powers in place who stalled the court hearings over just this issue, in hopes of getting Chelsea in trouble in the interim, while they waited. They are too smart for that. And this is wholly about getting the extra hardship consideration they were promised in the sale (not just the 12 mentioned). If they get done over on that, please believe they have plan B,C ….. through Z waiting, and more lawyers than the PL has employees. And why pick on Everton and Forest and not Chelsea …. Or even a Man City (although when dealing with court cases and fraud the primary reasons are different as well)? The Superleague. No one cares what Happens to those teams, and the FFP may really need to help them avoid spending money they genuinely don’t have (the original explanation for this slanted cap to begin with), but the primary fear is if you push enough of these mega money, mega teams with harassment too far…. If you make it also so that United and Liverpool, etc can never compete with teams from other leagues for the very top purchases (because that’s coming as the rules are set to get more restrictive), the more likely these teams are to run back to the arms of Madrid and company. People LOVE the women’s Superleague. It scares them, and it should.

What’s embarrassing is how y’all sit there talking about Chelsea but fail to mention man city 115 charges that haven’t yet been charge 🤷🏽‍♂️

I think its for the new stadium

CLASHES

thats brill accounting lol

It's utterly ridiculous that one should be able to sell to yourself to avert FFP rules.