3:48 fun fact, that security guard was the films Production Sound Mixer. His name is Simon Hayes and he has mixed every Guy Ritchie film so far (except Wrath of Man)
So many years later just noticing the poking finger from the glove at Frankie's missing ring finger on his right hand! Obviously, because the finger is missing on the character's hand, when he makes a fist, that empty glove finger sticks out. What an attention to detail!
years old comment I know, but every directors has done a shit gig. it happens all the time and is part of the business. Francis Ford Coppola directed Jack...yes, THAT Jack, the movie we all wish never happened, where Robin Williams plays a kid with an illness that will kill him before he finishes high school and its somehow turned into a light-hearted comedy. the worst part was if you ignored the offensive depiction of a disease with real life analogs (progeria, etc.) it's basically Robin Williams playing his Peter Pan character again while the writers ripped off "Big" (the Tom Hanks movie). If any movie ever deserved to have the director resort to the Alan Smithee pseudonym, it was that one.
Gentelmen is when person sneezes and what comes up, stick on the beard. Its nowhere close to Snatch and "Lock, stock and two smoking barrels". It tries to look and sound smart but it's not.
@@blacklight4720 didn't like the esthetic part of the Gentelmen. it looked clean and colorful unlike his firt two films and too modern not dirty enough and why everybody wearing glasses ? it felt like a giant fashion commercial tbh
I took me until the very last part of this scene to realize these characters were speaking English. Took me up until half way through the film with subtitles to even understand the characters
Close, but not quite. I believe you're referencing the scene in which Thanos uses the same inflection while asking The Collector (played by Benicio Del Toro" "Where is the stone?" I've always wondered if that was James Brolin's idea. Thought I was the only one who noticed, lol.
I read or watched something that Guy told Benicio how to do the robbery. He nodded and said yes, and then proceed doing it totally his way! I believe it's the footage in the movie aswell
@Chet Muggins That doesn't really make sense considering Luke 1:26 - 38 leaves no ambiguity in how Jesus was conceived. And considering Luke knew Mary directly, there is no chance he would have gotten circumstances wrong, even if he made a mistake when translating to Greek. Luke 1:34, Mary says pretty clearly she never knew a man.
@@VB-3yeah that's Christian tradition. But the point of the opening monologue I don't think is in the squabble over whether the Greek of the New Testament mistranslated the Hebrew prophecy or not in its citation "as it was written the virgin shall conceive and bear a son" etc. The point in my opinion is in the robber-dressed-as-a-rabbi's line, "Just because it is written, doesn't make it so." The whole monologue opens with him explaining that biblical stories like Adam and Eve should be interpreted as moral allegories and not as historical fact. Regardless of what we personally believe, I think it is clear that the point of this monologue in the film is about something more than a theological debate, like whether we should interpret biblical prophecy according to Jewish or Christian traditions. I seriously doubt the people who wrote the script were really all that concerned over whether thd audience was Christian or not since not one biblical reference in the movie is at all reverent 😂 My favorite example is the double entendre used by Brick Top, "In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary - come again?" which can refer both to her surprise at learning from Gabriel that she would conceive a son without having been with a man, but also to a woman asking a man during sex if he wants to go a little longer for another round of it lol. The movie here is making light of the Christian tradition and biblical narrative, perhaps for thematic purposes, definitely for comic ones, without really showing any reverence towards the tradition - i.e. treating it as a tool to be used in storytelling and no more. That's my interpretation of the opening monologue at least
@@NumberFast А это Томми. Он всем говорит, что его назвали в честь автомата томми-ган. Но на самом деле его назвали в честь знаменитого в 19 веке балетного плясуна. Сколько себя помню, я всегда знал Томми. Он мой партнер. Это не значит, что мы гуляем взявшись за руки. Это значит я постоянно пытаюсь вытащить его из тех передряг, в которые он меня впутывает. Я его держу в строгости. Чтобы нюх не терял. Но на самом деле он мне как брат.
