STEINHART Ocean One GREEN Ceramic - This Much VALUE Can't Possibly Exist! | Objective Review 

Thanks, I really appreciate it. That 39 is the perfect size!

Thanks Jett :)

I’ve heard great things about the Tisell. How’s the wrist feel on that one? I love the maxi case as well. Would be excited if Steinhart decided to try that styling as well. The bezel swap should be really cool, great idea!

@@StandardTime The wrist presence and overall fit for my 6.75 inch baby wrists is perfect actually. I really dig the squareness of the lugs and case on the new sub case. I’ll link a photo of it on my wrist. Although Steinhart uses Swiss ETAs, I feel as the the 90S5 is just fine for me. I don’t like to get caught up on specs most of the time. imgur.com/gallery/kSg26wu

Wow it looks great on your wrist! I can understand not caring about the movement as much when you’re buying the watch for the aesthetic in the first place.

I also have been interested in a 39mm Steinhart OVM. But then I discovered the Tisell Submersible. Its half the price of the Steiny.. But I think the Steinhart has better finishing.

Thanks man.That’s great! How does the Mido one-up the Steinhart if I may ask?

@@StandardTime Better bracelet, Links, and diver extension is amazing and functional. 80 hour power reserve. Also it has more originality and less of a rolex Homage identity. Mido is more expensive but worth it IMO. If you can afford to go to 1500$ price point thier 600m diver is a very nice option. Si hairspring and chronometer specification. Thx!

Christopher Ward is better built than Mido and Steinhart, though it lacks history.

I mentioned that’s it’s priced at about 450-500 USD/Euros/Pounds. There’s a slight difference depending on currency and VAT. For example in Europe it’s priced at €440 new on steinhartwatches.de.

hmm, not sure. Perhaps in the 2mm range.

True!

Thanks for watching! Whilst I have not got first hand experience of the San Martin, I am well aware of the level of quality they offer at the $€£ 200 price point. However, they all use NH-35s. So if you’re going for a fun budget watch that you don’t intend on having as your one main watch maybe it’s more sensible to get a San Martin. If you’re looking for a Swiss made tank that if it weren’t a homage could actually be priced close to $€£ 2k that would be the Steinhart. Personally I think there’s more value with the Steinhart but I get that it’s a bigger commitment as well.

If I recall correctly, it's a flat ceramic bezel insert. Smooth on the surface, no engraving.

@@StandardTime Strange, Steinhart tells me now it is engraved. I was asking them about the Pepsi ceramics. To be honest it doesn't look engraved on videos or pics. It is "funny" if it is not engraved, cause if someone wants it to look like the original, it would be better to buy aluminum, cause the elder Rolex were just like that, not engraved on aluminum.

I think I might be wrong then. It is possibly lightly engraved. I don’t have the watch anymore, hence the lack of clarity.

@@StandardTime On some vids\pics it looks engraved on most others it doesn't. Well however, thanks for the fast reaction.

From reviewing some of my pictures of it on Instagram, in sunlight there seems to be a very small shadow implying that it’s lightly engraved.

That’s great to hear! Cool that you’re able to use it

Well that's because I'm reviewing it as a watch, objectively, and not as a homage watch in particular.

Haha have a look at my more recent videos!

I’ve got to try that watch. Can’t imagine something to be of higher quality than the Steinhart. Although that said, the movement is still a huge plus for the Steinhart as NH-35s are dime a dozen in comparison to the Sellita. Also the Steiny is made in Switzerland so you get that. Can’t say which is the better watch yet without trying the San Martin though and it seems to be a steal at $160.

The Saint Martin might be good in terms of specs and cheap as chips, but the QC of chinese watches is poor to non existent, which means they are very hit or miss. That - and the fact they are made in sweat shops - is why they're cheap. There are many accounts of issues found. The watch you actually receive could have aesthetical or mechanical problems and the brand will probably not give you assistance in any way. Also, they cut corners in ways casual buyers don't notice in order to reduce costs - misaligned dials and cyclops, unregulated movements, unevenly milled cases and bracelets, dust leftovers inside the dial and case, bezels which rotate poorly... Like I said, very hit or miss. I also wouldn't risk actually diving with a SM, I doubt they have 100m WR, let alone 200 or 300. Which kind of defeats the purpose in a diving watch.

Nope

@@StandardTime I’ve ordered one.

www.colnon.com/

@@StandardTime They wouldn’t fake a homage would they?

Hmm. Seems terribly suspicious

You are spot on with this. A 6 for that movement running within the specs that he stated at plus 1sec per day is a silly score he gave for an even sillier reason...