Stop mass-shootings with this tech! 

100% agree. This type of security should be an absolutely no-brainer!

I agree. Most locations already has cams so to me the Omnilert should be installed on all.

Interesting with the gun detection software. But as it could not distinguish between a toy and a real weapon, could it also be fooled by say a workman holding a drill, or a VR weapon for example? Similar size and shape of a pistol, uzi etc. How tuned in is it? I would assume it alerts security before police for a human to assess the situation as a failsafe. The sad thing is that you need to have security detection like that in the first place to be honest.

I agree, this should be everywhere. I only wonder about false alarms, or the rate at which they occur, in real life. Still, it's worth it if it stops 1 mass shooting.

I agree. Thank you for posting, I cannot tell you how much you have educated me and helped me. Thanks

I agree. There might be ways around the system but it is better than nothing. Technology saving and improving lives is what it should be all about.

security cameras cant stop active shooters... armed security guards can. why do we send billions to trillions of dollars overseas when we should be spending a fraction of a percentage of that on our own countries security. a camera is fine, but as the saying goes, when second counts, help is minutes away. If you do not already have the help you need on scene, then you have already failed

I 100% agree with you on why this technology is around and available, but not installed.

100% agree especially in schools

I agree. Very informative video, thank you.

Ideally it is best to keep the shooter outside of the building. Once the person or persons are inside the chance of them shooting even one person goes up. If they have the weapon(s) hidden under a coat this is not going to detect it. Only when they expose the gun do these detectors help.

Some great tech out there Liron. Thank you for sharing them. I totally agree that these types of detection tech should be out there everywhere, from homes to hotels/motels, hospitals to airports, train stations to taxi ranks, schools to colleges and universities. Also government should make it hard to obtain guns. Sadly here in the UK we have knive crime increasing, and maybe the odd gun crime. But In the US its big crime. Thank you for sharing.

Agree 100% Liron. Thank you for spreading the word.

i agree. i guess it all comes down to costs to maintain and update these systems.

I wonder how robust their system is. It's been known for years that we can fool neural network-based object detection models using things like adversarial stickers and patterns.

100% agree - get these in our schools.

Great review!

I agree. Great video.

Brilliant! Well done that man! I agree! : )

I agree with you that it would help out everyone that is at the place a activity shooting is going on .💯💯

How could someone not agree Thank you for showing this

Definitely something straight out of the future. I imagine this surveillance feature will also be used by drones.

It costs money and the politicians have other priorities.

Great stuff.

I agree this should be in every school, unforuntley schools barely have any fundings to get this kind of tech and it maintenance cost.

I absolutely agree.

I totally agree!!!

This has a very easy workaround just make your gun not look like a gun.

I totally agree and it's starting to get that way in the UK as well

Great Tech bring it on…

Agree!!!

Seems like it would be pretty easy for the bad guy to disguise the weapon as something else.

I Agree 💯 👍.

Agreed without a doubt.

I agree. Who would disagree with anything that could possibly help? Thank you for bringing to our attention.

Man, this would be great for law enforcement body cameras to better identify threats and justify deadly force encounters.

I agree, great technology.

It should automatically go in lockdown when it sees a shooter approaching the building. If the shooter makes it inside, the building should have smart locks to keep the shooter locked in an enclosed area. Not too hard to do with todays technology, paying for it is another story though.

I agree .

Interesting!

My only concern is for false positives the first system could generate, depending on how well the algorithm is tweaked. That could cause everything from paranoia to disregard(apathy). As to why its not in every school.. that's a multi-factor issue. Cost is probably the big one. Personally though I think there are far darker connotations than just cost alone.

I agree. Why isn't this being implemented now? Its ridiculous that there isn't MORE being done to help protect our Children.

Wonderful to be able to detect weapons quickly. However, this helps only if someone is continually monitoring the screen. Humans being humans, that won't happen

I agree. I'm thankful that in Australia we have next to no mass shootings and would like to see the technology implimented here to (hopefully) keep it that way.

No brainer.....AGREE 100%

I think it needs human confirmation like from security monitoring the cameras. If no confirmation is made then alert authorities (to minimize false alarms) The drill team practiced right outside the school with toy rifles.

I agree!

I agree 100%

I AGREE !!!

Agree 100%

I somewhat agree. I give you an example with that shot detector. So I have these installed in my home. A robber breaks in while we sleep. He see me in the basement and shoots me, so there your shot that will be detected. Now I will lowball the number. Let say it takes the police to get to my house is 2 minutes. This shoot still has 2 minutes to get the rest of my family. I see how the tech wants to save us all, but it can't. Someone will still get killed with these techs. Only way to take out a shooter in my house is when we are all armed.with knowledge on how to use it safely. Many may not agree with me, which is fine and I have no issue with those who want to have the shot detector in their homes. I have no say about anyone homes, only mine. I just hope these folks with shot detectors don't depend on legal gun owners to save the day if they are neighbours. I know for sure I won't be stick my neck out for my neighbours with shot detectors. Once I hear a shot I get prepped. ANd that school surveillance one i forget the name of it. It should be placed in all schools. But safety for the common folks is expensive and the governments can afford it but play the game they can't because they have wars so they can wash taxpayer money and keep it. They will never install these things in poor and working class schools. Now schools where elite kids go, they most likily had this kind of tech even before this video came out, but its all new to us poor and working class.

Yes, I agree

I agree

I agree, I live in an old age home

Agreed

i agree

I agree with this video

Totally Agree. Now what?

Agree

AGREED 👍👍

I AGREE

I agree mahn

Secure your border, end "Sanctuary Cities"

personally me myself i live in the UK

Great ideas to keep people safe

That would work

* I agree.

I agree, but it is all about money

I agree 🇦🇺

I agree with you 100%, all the technologies that can help prevent a tragedy and save even one life is not expensive! One life saved is worth all the costs. What we need to do is start a petition for the government to subsidize such technologies to help us safeguard our lives! We pay taxes to the government so that they can make our lives better, so why not ask for what we need and want?

The tech is all good but switch off power & it's all over.

I agree. 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000%

I highly doubt this would stop an incident. Fire alarms don't stop fires, they merely warn tgat that a fire is occurring. On that, 98% of all alarms are false. So, will this just muddy the waters and create unnecessary panic situations and draws resources into nonthreat situations? What if tge alarm sounds and there isn't anyone armed or trained to counter that threat? We've seen it. The police arrive and dont take appropriate action. Mass shooters need to be afraid, and that's definitely not one of their attributes.

if it's not politics, it's money, or BOTH.

If it is made & available it needs to be used to keep people safe. We are tired of burying people over random shootings!

What a sad indictment of US society that this sort of system is needed at all.

This technology should be used in whole of the USA at the earliest. Taking time in adoption is like giving a chance to a criminal.

WOW. The volume of bots in the comments supporting mass surveillance of private men/women without cause is very concerning.

4:17 / 4:18 - Whose is the typo? (Just checking) I agree! : )

After Columbine, I expected all kinds of safety devices would be installed in schools,......not that there were many available at that time. Even lock all the doors, open during school hours, even a metal detector.......You have to start somewhere! I have worked for governments, hospitals, nursing homes. We always had to have a code to enter in keypad, a card to slide in the slot; a button to push and wait for employee; or a speaker;, cameras. One place we had to call ahead and they put your name on a list and you used your card on the "incoming slot". On your device that only triggers if you have your hand on the weapon; ummm, you can stuff a lot of guns in backpacks, boots, belts, pockets, sleeves; I just don't get that one, but nothing is fool-proof. Thanks.

EU: nah, we just.. you know.. dont use guns.. US: we need MORE guns, but only if there was a way to not have shootings....

I❤

How long till someone works out how to change the outline of a gun so the shape won't trigger the system? A jury rigged cardboard shroud or 3D printer plans posted online for changing the profile of a AR-15, Glock and other popular firearms because.."Freedom." The shooter detector wouldn't pick up a gun with a silence/suppressor. Mass shooters usually plan their attacks out for days to weeks beforehand. And once the guns are detected? (usually by the first few victims being shot - so tough luck for them). I can destroy the argument for these systems being able to keep people safe with one word; *Uvalde.*

This fascist, guised as convenient safety bs makes me sick.

Maybe looking at countries where mass shootings do not happen may actually help finding out what works 😂

What if I mount a weapon connected to the camera? A weapons that shoots the person holding the gun before they can use it.

Its all 2nd amendment

Advocating for a society to be surveilled by public servants leads to China style social credit system. Very disappointing

Maybe. Its a double-edged sword because maybe it works well and we roll it out to malls, airports, and streets. Maybe we ca detect shoplifting, jaywalking, and spitting. Soon, we'll detect the people's commenta about those in power and maybe we can bring them in to have chat. I like AI but am scared of what corporations will rebadge this as.

I disagree, with an ineffective police force (over 90% of school shooting end when the gunman commits' suicide) these are just another useless expense for schools etc. Police literally wait outside until nothing happens. This is soooo common, making this system of alert redundant. Your countries problems are way more invasive than what this solution is supposed to be for. Having said that I can't knock people for trying. Please stay safe my American Friends

I disagree...and it's hard not to get into politics here. Think about what has helped to drive up school shootings in the first place. Two major items--the huge amount of weapons that are easy to obtain, and the near instant reporting and covering of these shootings which helps to inspire future acts. The solutions in the video are purely reactive. Image classification--great if it always finds a gun drawn, but missed positives and false positives could be a huge problem given the stakes. Sound and IR detection--again, false positives would be really bad, and I also think even if it works: the barn door is already open, the amount of information coming in as the shooter moves will likely overwhelm. It might be useful for responding police, but only if they have easy access to it. Arming school personnel--holy crap, just don't. Adding more weapons to the mix is definitely the wrong move. Think about the following: access to a gun drastically raises suicide risks, plus having guns in that environment that could end up in a troubled studently hands is not a recipe for success. I'm much more interested in making guns harder to acquire, but the political will of the country is not there. So here we are, making schools into warzones. What a time to be alive.

Because it dont work

When I was a teenager, say about 50 years ago, a policeman used to drive up through the town at 5 mph. We boys only had to be walking, talking, minding our own business and he would stop us and say : What's your name, Where you going, What you got in your pockets? In this way he knew all the local lads and could easily see which ones might be troublemakers. The school teachers knew them all too. I remember the day about (1967-68) when the headmaster announced he was going out to pay a visit to the parents of one of the pupils. I was once in his office when another boy was getting the cane. Not the old "six of the best" WHACK! - Just a gentle tap tap tap on the hand. Until the boy, in tears, decided to tell the truth of the matter. We lived in a town virtually free of crime. (When did they decide to take the cane away from headmasters? Was it about the same time teachers had to become entertainers to keep children's attention - because of television!)

Or just move to a country that doesn't have a gun fetish so strong that it's more important than your kids' safety.

😂 inauthientic shill. Unsub

Agree.

I agree

i agree

I agree

I agree