Summary of UHF RC systems (hardware) 

GeneralLeeStupid1 Yes, that'll be a separate video.

+wippo76 Hoping for a part 2 also.

ABMNS PRODUCTION EZUHF. IBCrazy did a nice review a year or two ago. I've been using EZUHF for sometime now & found it reliable. It would be nice if their configuration software provided more flexibility in freq and power selection but its more flexible than the Scherrer setup and most other systems. The Dragon was always known as the poorer design but it seems popular in the US. I have to use 459MHz so that limited my options straight away. At the time only OpenLRS offered an off the shelf option until ImmersionRC were persuaded by a UK retailer to add this freq but in the UK firmware they also limited its power and removed the dual power switch option which was annoying. Its interesting how they all use off the shelf transceivers.Good preview by Bruce.

+ABMNS PRODUCTION after so many reviews, i ended up with EzUHF because IBCrazy reviewed it to be the only system which was not affected by RF interference, diversity system and UHF scan method.

+James Balagtas After saying all that I found their EZUHF 8 channel diversity receiver works well but I have a dodgy EZUHF 8-ch Lite receiver which I only just recently noticed keeps cutting out when provided with fast control movements. At first I thought it was antenna orientation on my planes causing issues-its an odd one. I do like the look of the TBS CrossFire setup but its only just been released. I did find TBS's early modded Lawmate video transmitters were not very reliable but I expect that is more down to the poor Lawmate quality issues. I found in the EZUHF setups IBCrazy'a dipole antennas work really well (the included antennas provide poor range), better than my home made attempts I also use the Diamond SRH771 Antenna (SMA) on the transmitter (be careful of Chinese poor quality clones) which is attached to a transmitter support to keep it away from the radio to avoid any interference.

+stewjw agree, dipole are full wave antennas compared to the stock antenna of my EzUHF diversity rx. i dont have a good diamond whip antenna yet, im using the rmilec whip antenna lol. i haven't noticed any control cutout on mine, do you think its signal loss or just latency problems, i feel the 2.4ghz have less latency than UHF systems. If the antenna is affecting the electronics of the radio, it could be another cause of being cut off, the power in the radio must have a capacitor, 0,001uf near the the power if the module. im thinking of making a moxon antenna that rchacker showed in his videos, ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1YkHGjWyMQI.html looks similar to the one recomended sold by ibcrazy. radiation pattern suits long range, more in front and sides

Wyll Surf Air That'll be a separate video.

***** but it should be in direct comparison to these, should they not?

staslig You'll still be able to compare the CrossFire to these systems but 868MHz is a little different to 433 in terms of its characteristics and the Crossfire system offers more features/functions than most of the long-range systems tested this time around.

staslig CROSSFIRE is LRS so it should be add and it nice to know how it works.

lewis shipway I will add it... but the videos in the UHF series were shot a while ago and I didn't to hold up these ones until I'd got the Crossfire videos done.