dunno if anyone gives a damn but if you're stoned like me atm then you can watch pretty much all of the new movies on InstaFlixxer. Have been binge watching with my gf for the last few days =)
Reed's Wicked Stepmother speech built a totem of its own as the best character roast to happen on tv in the history. not even Santana Lopez can top that.
Oh you mean watching an over flamboyant gay diva try to tell a woman how to live her life? 😂 If a straight person woulda said that to someone gay all hell woulda broke lose but it's ok because he's gay and she's a woman? Where they do that at?
Uncle Kyle I think you need to pipe down with your internalized homophobia. This has nothing to do with his sexuality, and to constantly point at that makes you look like an idiot. People roasted the shit out of Colton, another gay contestant who was much more flamboyant than Reed, and no one got upset because he deserved it. Missy treated people like garbage, and she got what she deserved. Now stop with your antiquated complaints about gay people like a whiny child and attempt to have some realism in your thinking. And just saying, I have no idea who you are or what you look like, but I’d bet money Reed could kick your ass in a heartbeat.
Sho Franz but how he said she gave her daughter the best sleeping spot, I feel like that’s because she’s a mom and she felt the need to do that not because she’s an “evil” person who thinks her daughter and herself are better than anyone else
@@OMVRRR Michele did nothing and only won because people like Jason, Scot, and Julia couldn't handle the fact that they were outplayed by a nerdy girl and a skinny gay guy, and they punished Aubry for playing the game.
Ian Stephenson that was Cydney. Aubrey made one move in 3 seasons of survivor. Tai was flip flopping like pancakes the whole season and only voted correctly two times the entire merge. They obviously tried to push Aubry the entire season like they did people Cochran and Ben probably the worst winners ever
@@OMVRRR Please explain to me how Michele was better than Aubry. I can understand why Tai got no votes, but Aubry and Cydney literally dictated the entire post-merge portion of the game.
To the people complaining about bitter juries: yeah, sometimes it’s really frustrating, but ultimately, good jury management is an essential element of winning survivor.
Why did Todd win Survivor: China? Because he told the jury what they want to hear. Why did Stephanie lose Guatamala and Russel lose both Samoa and HvV? They didn't tell the jury what they wanted to hear. Juries are bitter. They want to be where the Final 2/3 are sitting. Just shut up, hear their anger, and win their vote. Big asterisk though: Speeches like Corrine's are just foul, and as "TV entertaining" as they are, should not be allowed to be said. There is one thing to pull a Lex and Eliza and call out finalists for being dirtbags for their gameplay, it's entirely another to get personal and attack their overall character.
Eriks speech in Samoa is honestly kind of incredible. I almost see Natalie start off thinking of herself so lowly and he just really made her feel like a worthy competitor. She’s in tears at the end.
Going into final tribal not one person was voting Natalie. It was a toss up between mick' or Russell who they couldn't except that he destroyed them. Natalie was ignored in the beginning and addressed the jury one by one and told them everything about them, backgrounds, kids, homes, families etc had almost all of them crying. She absolutely owned the social game
Muhammed Autobahn not so sure about that... the Jury was REALLY anti-Russell, outside of those who allied with him on Galu in Shambo and John. They liked him more. But everyone else didn’t like Russell, and would rather have Natalie win. I believe I heard at the Final 10, natalie was given votes not only because she wouldn’t have an idol played on her, and because if they went to rocks, they’d like her to be safe. Russell was extremely arrogant, and Mick was feckless and essentially milquetoast. Two personalities that they hated versus someone who they actually liked and saw growth in. Russell wasn’t going to win unless he brought two players: Shambo and Jaison. Maybe John. But Russell was to blinded by flashy moves, betraying his allies, and only seeing gold and glory. Yes, Russell played a great strategic game, but one could say his strategic game made him worse as a player. Edit: Might as well add that Natalie worked with the Galu women(Monica, Kelly, and Laura), whereas Russell basically looked like he was following her funny enough. Interviews with Jaison, Brett, and Mick(5th,4th,3rd) tell us that Russell was doomed, as he didn’t do much around camp, his ego was crazy, he took sole credit for group decisions, and was actually in need of saving by his alliance. Jaison notes that the two front runners were actually Mick and Natalie, based on answers, and while Mick didn’t really give great answers, Natalie did better. Brett notes that he could be swayed, but Russell’s hubris came back to it when he claimed he was the best player ever. I believe that since Russell was going to be on HvV more than likely that they hammed up his screentime, which hurt Natalie’s game, since we didn’t get to truly see how well she played. Am I saying she’s top 10? No. Top 20? Still no. She only won due to a “bitter jury” and because Russell was too mean? Definitely not.
@@creative_commander4973 they all said it themselves. That was back when they couldn't talk about season for a long time. Dave, laura, etc. I agree they was anti Russell and bitter that's why Mick was an option. Thankfully after that season and then Heroes versus Villains The Jury started a awarding the best player. If bitter jury kept going we have winners like Natalie t, sabrina, Lisa w, Gervais, woo u get idea lol
Reed's speech is the most iconic! He's so well spoken and didn't miss a beat. The perfect segway from the Wicked Step-mother analogy to how her fait will ultimately decided was unmatched
Completely agree. People always say he rehearsed that speech, he says he didn’t. As he says, he comes from a family of public speakers (dad is a politician), so he grew up around that, and of course being a Broadway performer certainly helped.
I also feel like I despised Missy the entire season watching so Reed's speech to me was like thank god someone called this women out because I couldnt have lived with that for 5 days let alone almost 30!
Reed's is easily the most brutal speech here. Sue set the bar pretty high, especially considering it was the first season, but it wasn't that harsh compared to most of these.
@@ConVermin Sue's was compelling and persuasive, that's why it was a close vote. This video was about the brutal/harsh spoken speeches. In this sense I don't think Sue's was as bad as a couple others.
@@Nate9-9 Greg was already voting for rich he wanted a jury speech that would be remembered (confirmed in post game interviews) and the same was confirmed by the cast after Sue's jury speech that lsot Rich 2 votes for sure and possibly the 3rd
the evil step mother rant went from what seemed like it was going to be some over the top metaphor to straight exposing a woman for her mental games she played throughout the season she thought nobody noticed.
I love a brutal final TC but the first one went wayyyy too far...u don't talk about a persona dead family member like that. Someone should have said something in sugars defense...and I don't even like sugar.
Fidel Carrillo i mean i can agree that she can be a bit irritating sometimes but still talking about her dead father is a topic she shouldnt’ve touched and someone should’ve defended sugar in that situation
J_Jammer nah, you couldn’t have this on TV anymore. Survivor is too family friendly these days and the PC police would be in a uproar every time a man spoke poorly of a woman or a white person spoke poorly to someone of colour etc etc you get my point. They need a adults version of survivor before they bring back this type of thing.
@@langa77777 I think a good middle ground is to have the speeches be bonus material they release on their website or on RU-vid. That way it's optional to watch and not part of the televised program.
I have never watched her season and didn’t watch the show until Amazing Race did a Big Brother vs Amazing Race vs Survivor season. She was matched up with Eliza and they just badmouthed and were horrible to people. I was like, “I can understand why at the beginning of the season you said you’re both single. Cause you both are nasty.”
Corinne's speech sounded like she graduated summa cum laude from the Sue Hawk School of Vicious Jury Speeches. Unless she sincerely thought Sugar was making it up regarding her father's recent death (shades of Jonny "Fairplay" making it up about his grandmother's recent death to help win a reward) that was uncalled for in bringing him up.. The "handful of antidepressants" remark was for those not in the know was in reference to Corinne's then in real life employment in pharmaceutical sales. Liked how Sugar flipped her the bird.
Lucas Delgado From a Lex AMA on r/survivor, “The big difference between those two situations was that Ethan and I had made no deals or agreements for Survivor All Stars. In fact, most of us players who were non-winners were totally up-front with the previous winners that they had to go, and they would be a top priority. (Although that said, we didn't tell Hatch, because we knew we'd have to blindside him.) As far as the thing with Boston Rob goes, he and I had essentially made a deal when he asked me to protect Amber, and he welched on it as soon as he could. All that said, I ain't in the least bit bitter about it. Rob beat me fair and square, and I got got. He was willing to use every trick, weapon and tool in the box, and that made him a better player than me. Did it hurt though...fuck yeah!”
@@wills3210 I’m a huge fan of Reed, he was definitely one of the best players in that season. His plan to get Jon out was really good and would’ve worked if Keith hadn’t spoiled it. Natalie did say in an interview, though, that she heard about the plan, and that’s why she warned Jon. She wanted him out herself, but still needed him for a few more votes. I wish Reed would get a second chance.
Thing that’s hilarious all these years later is that Parvati says that she and Ozzy were barely friends and almost never hung out after Cook Islands and she’s confused as to why he thought they were really good friends
Another hilarious part is that Ozzy literally admits that he and Amanda were basically inseparable. If he had any idea how the game is supposed to be played, he'd realize that Parvati voting him out was her best move. Really highlights how Ozzy doesn't understand Survivor at all.
LOL, no she doesn't. She's cruel and pathetic. You simps can't accept that survivor is a game about betrayal, so her being just cruel to dawn is uncalled for. She may look pretty but she's one of the ugliest person in survivor
I totally agree. I generally felt she was extremely arrogant and self-centred throughout the entire game, but that part of her speech was absolutely unnecessary and the expression on her face when she said it was just petty and bitchy.
@@patriciamillin1977 at least I found Corinne to be a bit more mature in Caramoan. Her hatred towards Phillip was justified, as Phillip is just an annoying blowhard.
The more times I watch it the more I believe that Brenda would have been satisfied if Dawn could admit that she was a MAJOR factor in her journey to ftc. Brenda literally gave her a get out of humiliation card in the form of acknowledgement.
If dawn would have simply said "yes, I would have gone home" and gave her the kudos for keeping her in the game...then maybe she wouldnt have had to go through the whole thing of taking her teeth out infront of everyone cus damn even I cringed.
@@nla5307 it’s the fact that brenda told her to do that and still didn’t vote for her. i think it’s sexist that people were attacking and upset with Dawn for blindsiding Brenda , but weren’t mad at Tony for blindsiding Trish
@@jimin7997 That's because Brenda saved Dawn's teeth, and threw a challenge to give her immunity, and Dawn still voted her out. It was so unnecessarily cruel, so these circumstances are not the same, and therefore, it is not sexist
@@totaldramatyler4484 so brenda saved her teeth means she is obliged to take her to the final three and have her back all game?? you guys are idiots if you think like that. this is a game of outwit, outlast, and outplay ! you cannot expect to trust your alliance 100% no matter how close y’all seem. they aren’t here for loyalty and for friendships. y’all didn’t say this to tony when he betrayed trish who was his biggest ally and sacrificed her game for him but he voted her out. these a bunch of other examples but you guys attack a women for making a big move
@@totaldramatyler4484 no one told brenda to throw an immunity challenge. literally the dumbest fucking move to throw away guaranteed safety especially if you don’t have an idol.
When I was younger I use to think Corinne’s speech was iconic, now I’m slightly disgusted by the dead father comment. Way over the line. Edit: And Ozzy makes me cringe. Jesus christ dude it’s a game your playing FOR money. Butthurt af.
We also have to understand that we are watching everything (or mostly everything) on tv. There’s a lot that the jury doesn’t see until they get home and watch it. So it’s pretty normal for them to be bitter about situations that they may not really know about
Toni Lee Lex and Ethan were still great friends beforehand, and if you go back and watch all stars, you’ll see that Lex made a pact with Ethan, so it was still a betrayal, despite him being a winner
My theory is Ozzy wasn't nearly as bitter at Parvati as it appears in his speach (although he was likely still bitter). I think he was trying his hardest to have Amanda win and tried to portray Parvati as a bad person.
And to think Jerri's considered the original Survivor villainess?! Original black widow, yes; villainess, no. In retrospect the only bad things she did concerned beef jerky - and YEARS later, Jeff Probst said he believed her (but did zip) - and be very outspoken.
@@here2thrive Parv turned against and blindsided Ozzy in Micronesia and he was very upset about it. That same season he got romantically involved with Amanda and ripped into Parv about "taking away" however many days on the island with Amanda. It was super cringey.
Lucien the jury didn’t do Russell dirty Russell did the jury dirty it’s no shock to me that Russell has never won playing the way he does Survivor is a social game periodT if you can’t get people to like you you’re not gonna win
Lucien there’s no way you can convince me that a player who blatantly backstabs most if not all the jury in their efforts to make it to the top three is robbed after not receiving the most votes like it’s a SOCIAL GAME and SOCIALLY he did poorly
Anthony Mendez Agreed, man. The open form crap doesn’t let the jury speak freely. They’re being interrupted every thirty seconds and don’t even ask questions.
@@qgallagher yes i agree. the most dominant jury members will control and dictate the discussion. and you even saw in the last final tribal, they all shut Noura down when she did the whole, "my ex boyfriend thing," which ruins the integrity of the game. I like it when the jury member who is asking the question is the only one to speak, to make a statement and ask a question of the final 2/3 and the other jury members are quiet. It's their time to shine and to get answers to their questions. And while we are at it, bring back final 2, the final 3 format sucks and there is always a "goat" who gets no votes and it's anticlimactic.
The All-Stars were soooo rough on Rob - more than they needed to be. I think he was really shocked and hurt and trying not to break down. Maybe he deserved some of it, but wow. I think jury anger grows exponentially when they get to Ponderosa and hear how angry the others are, which gives them permission to blame someone in the game for their own loss or failure.
They were ridiculous. They were ALL scheming, lying and breaking deals themselves. They were a bunch of dirty hypocrites who were mad that their game didn't work out and his did. Stupid of them to be so bitter and award the win to Amber when (as much as I love her) she was only there because of Rob's plays. Rob was so much better than they gave him credit for and their poor sportsmanship made me dislike every one of them, to this day.
Rob has said that his only regret playing survivor was that he didn’t stand up and tell them to F off but they made him feel so horrible that he just sat in silence.
@@nwobringiton1282 Rob said that to Natalie in Redemption Island, then the scene right after that he talks in the confessional about how he's planning to take her with him to the end and is trying to give her false tips that would make the jury hate her instead of him 😂🤣
i think it's because he was such a challenge beast. i personally loved the way he played at challenges (and i enjoy rewatching his videos) but not a big fan of his personality. he seems to take things very personally (+ i heard he cheated on amanda, which is a big minus in my book).
I’m also a fan of Ozzy, he plays an amazing game as far as challenges are concerned, but I’m not blind to his faults. His biggest flaw is his arrogance, which always gets in his way. He always seems to think that the others wouldn’t vote him out because he’s such a great provider and everyone needs food, although Parvati had already said in Micronesia that she didn’t care about that. He has to stop thinking that will get him through the game, and concentrate more on his social skills, not just on the challenges and the provider role. Cochran was a huge fan of his going into the season 23, but Ozzy was very condescending to him, which must’ve been a huge disappointment. Had Ozzy been kinder and more understanding that not everyone has his great survival skills, I’m sure Cochran wouldn’t have flipped.
Ozzy was so amazing and fun in Cook Islands. He was my favorite Survivor player for a while because of that. But he clearly let the fame go to his head. He became a bad person afterwards. Now he’s not in my favorites at all anymore.
Honestly, Bob giving Randy the fake idol was a pretty good strategic decision because it essentially gained him Sugar’s loyalty. And that eventually led to Sugar giving Bob a chance to win the game at F4 with Fire Making.
This is what pisses me off in this show people get so butt hurt and triggered over getting voted out suck it up it’s what the game of survivor is respect the gameplay get over it, I understand people get hurt but they know what they’re signing up for.
TheFire Specialist he was good but Jeff said it himself Russell's not gonna win bc there's 3 aspects of the game. The physical asset, strategic asset, and the social asset. Russell did 2 of those. Without the social part you might get far but you won't get a million bucks.
Correction: people were literally people. They could ask whatever they wanted to w/o having the whole "outwit, outplay, outlast" criteria shoved down their throats at the bogus open forum BS imposed by the producers
4:16, to be honest, I actually gain a lot of respect for Parvati when Ozzy and Eliza make their ridiculous statements and she is able to just remain calm lol
Yes. That was the start of bitter jury's. That is what began the whole change in how the jury voted. Don't vote FOR someone vote AGAINST someone. It's ridiculous. But hey, that's the game gotta accept the outcome. Haha.
I mean, id rather vote someone who did nothing to me than someone who bullshitted me... Just look at america... Biden is winning not because he is deserving but because trump isnt
Social aspect is the most important out of this game. Ozzy is the greatest physical specimen to see this show, at times shows good strategic play, but his social game is so bad, so egotistical that he never won. Russell Hantz and Boston Rob are the greatest strategists in the game, but their social aspects are so bad that they're a combined 1-7 record in survivor. The one win being a freebie to Rob by Jeff and Co. Tony, the greatest player of all time, was a one trick pony. His first time his social game was terrible, he won zero challenges, and lucked out by being surrounded by a bunch of idiots who are only topped in ignorance by Redemption Island's cast. He got put into an all Star cast, and was the 2nd boot his social game was still so weak. But he evolved. In a season of all winners, his social game was so brilliant that this CAST OF WINNERS, literally paid him tokens so he could f up their own games. His strategy was so masked behind his brilliant social game that he got zero votes against him. The best game ever played, topping Kim and JT. Meanwhile, this very same game has been won twice by Sandra, someone who barely has ever had a strategic bone in her body, and is so inept physically that the sit out bench is now named after her. Her social awareness and ability to talk to others has garnered her 2 million dollars. The social aspect is the most important!!!!
Most people think Ozzy’s speech is an emotional scene, but I think it was because of what he said by the end of his speech when he confessed his feelings for Amanda.
I was with you until you said that Tony was a one-trick pony. I do agree that his first game was pretty bad, but calling Cagayan's cast "a bunch of idiots who are only topped in ignorance by Redemption Island's cast" is just erroneous. Tony happened to be the only strategist in the majority after the merge, and his biggest flaw was following too closely the saying that "the best thing that can happen to you in a Survivor post-merge is getting your allies sent to the jury" like he was Russell in Heroes vs. Villains. Combined with the presence of Chaos Kass, he made the Cagayan merge look like a trainwreck. That said, he did it on purpose, and while his game wasn't amazing, he actually got the job done, even if he won zero challenges and his social game was played second-hand by Trish. In his second outing, he was surrounded by a bunch of literal-whos who saw a winner, and immediately wanted him out, like it was All-Stars. The big-threats alliance could've worked out if he didn't immediately flame out by alienating Sandra. So that's on him, but still, I don't see him making it very far any way in this lost cause of an environment. In these regards, it makes sense that in Winners at War, he becomes a big contender: his threat level has dropped considerably from the Game Changers debacle, and he is in a cast full of winners, and suddenly he is just allowed to be the good old crazy silly Tony, all while still being the strategist he always was. On Sandra, her lack of strategy is a lie. She isn't the biggest strategist out there, sure, but she knew how to pull moves when she needed to, mostly in Heroes vs. Villains. That said, you're right: she did win 2 mil on the back of her social awareness. The social aspect is the most important!!!
@@KeitaroHirochiif you're vouching for Cagayan's cast I'm not gonna take your opinion seriously. Entertaining? Yeah. Having awareness and intelligence? Never. If you think Sandra is a strategist, your opinion on anything pertaining to the series is null and void. Her one attempt at a strategic move in 4 seasons was a JT Thomas esque idol give blunder. Just stop
@@jingjangchong5426 I’d say her biggest strategic move was the Coach boot in HvV, stroking Russell’s paranoia to protect her alliance partner was beautiful.
Fabio proved that the social aspect was most important, he was the happy-go-lucky guy for the whole group and that lack of animosity means he wouldn't have been a target to anyone who wasn't strategic enough to see his game.
An interesting phenomenon about Survivor is that now in hindsight, we can all deride speeches like the one by the guy who was calling out Russell for playing an 'unethical game', but it is players going into the game with that philosophy that made the show great for me. Now that we have basically seen everything there is to see, and everybody having a consensus that the game is fundamentally about duplicity has rendered the game an almost unwatchable watered-down version of itself.
I am kind of bored so I am going to give my thoughts on bitter jury. Survivor may have some brutal speeches, but they aren’t that bitter because I guess they understand. Big Brother, on the other hand, is getting now annoying to watch. Seeing someone not make any strategic moves or being on both sides and doing nothing DOES NOT DESERVE TO WIN. Paul should have won both seasons, but a bitter jury PUNISHED him for making good moves. The one I am so mad about is Tyler. He controlled the game completely, being the cause of almost every vote yet not getting voted out. He orchestrated the hive literally voting out the hive. Kaycee, on the other hand DID NOTHING. Great job, you won a couple veto’s. Other than that, she just sat on level 666’s lap and rode the entire game. I hope this upcoming season isn’t like the others lately.
I remember watching the BB20 finale and seeing jury members laugh or smile as Tyler was explaining to Bayleigh that he needed to make her look like his enemy to not put a target on his back. I knew at that point that he was about to lose $450 000 to a bitter jury and my face fell.
@@landofsurvivor we can say that when we haven't played but when you're playing for a million dollars, the stakes are way higher. I mean imagine who you think is your best friend in the game, cut your throat and cost you potentially A MILLION DOLLARS. While it makes for great tv, if you put yourselves in their shoes, it becomes way more personal. However, there are very bitter juries some times and don't reward the best player.
season 28 was pretty brutal. i usually find the jury speeches part to be really boring (specially the season 41 one) but 28 i was so interested the entire time as the jury ripped tony a new one.
I love it when they say they have no bitterness but then launch a tirade haha Lex is the biggest hypocrite - so he wanted to win and he would have to do the same to get those greenbacks haha It is always a game and no matter what deals you make that is the way it is
Lex helped his friend in a sacrificial manner based on out of game trust and he broke that. Rob chose to make it not just a game. He lost what he used.
Yeah All-stars hasn't aged well. All these years later the only.bitter juror that's understandable is Tom. It's kinda awkward and sad how he reacts but I do sort of understand it. And on top of that some of his frustration was probably lingering from Africa and ironically was probably caused by Lex.
No offense to Brenda, but her getting voted out by a friend she'd made less than a month ago is not equivalent to the shame that a woman feels when she's missing multiple teeth. She did not "know it's hard" to the intensity it is that comes with those stigmas. My respect for her flew away when she made another woman go through that. Her goal was not to make Dawn "know how she felt", the goal was to hurt her as badly as she could on public television while seeming like she was on the high ground. It was really really gross feeling watching it then and watching it now. Just gross. Edit: I remembered Dawn's name lol
Im now in my 30s and i STILL to this day think about that water comment from Sue. Its one of the meanest things ive ever heard anyone say to someone but it perfectly describes how much you can hate someone at the time.
Chem Student For such a good game, Spencer was on the bottom of his original tribe until Jeremy decided to give him a lifeline on the other tribes alliance. Woo at least was almost never on the bottom and had a way better social game
meatballization so you’re telling me jeremy wouldn’t have won winners at war if he made it to the end? A lot of winners are at the bottom at some point. Jeremy helped him one time. Spencer blindsided fischback who was his number one. He could’ve easily went after Jeremy at that point if he wanted too. Spencer was in a power position the majority of the game.
Chem Student Wha does what Jeremy did in WaW have to do with anything? Ok and Jeremy blindsided Spencer by voting off Monica and Ciera. Spencer was on the bottom the entire pre-merge then Jeremy basically handed him a 2nd life cus he knew Spencers a shield he would easily beat in the end. Spencer does not get to f3 without Jeremy, not the other way around.
meatballization you obviously didn’t read what I wrote. I said most of the players are given a lifeline at some point. It doesn’t mean anything. Who cares about pre merge? The game isn’t even played until the merge. The bitter was really bitter towards Spencer and Jeremy was really likeable. That’s a disastrous combo. It has nothing to do with jeremys gameplay.
Also, Jon says he approached some of the other players at Ponderosa, to ask if they might consider voting for Jaclyn because they were trying to have a baby by surrogate, and needed the extra money. Reed was one of the people he approached and the only one who went along with it, but obviously he also had his own reasons for voting Jaclyn.
i’m torn because on one hand the current format allows for the finals 3 to explain their game better and watching them go back and forth is entertaining but on the other hand we don’t get iconic moments like these anymore
I get it. These speeches were awesome, but I have to admit I do like the new format where they make it a real debate. I just watched season 42 and was impressed at how amiable the FTC was, how appreciative people were of everyone else’s gameplay. It kind of made for good sportsmanship.
That Jury speech made me feel like my heart and soul is coming out of my body, it was so intense and I'm surprised that Trish still voted for him but Tony has good jury management unlike Russell.
There's no way you can win survivor without getting hated on by the people who got voted off directly or indirectly by your strategies. Wow..... just wow. Survivor is definitely not for the light-hearted and what Lex said was totally accurate. Competing in Survivor is like selling your soul to the devil.
so do you think it is even remotely "possible" for a player to at least make it to the Final 3 without telling a single lie during the course of the game? if not win it??
Ozzy’s speech to Parvati is one of the reasons i don’t like him that much🤨🥱 also why wasn’t the speech that Natalie (i think) said to Parvati where she said “how does your game resonate with you when you’re performing in bed” or something like that, that was uncalled for💀
Corinne’s jury speech is the only reason anyone remembers her. The only meaningful thing she did in the game was isolate Susie and Sugar from the rest of the Onions, causing them to flip.
Ozzie looks ridiculous lol. He had no issue making the fake idol to basically humiliate Jason/Eliza and yet he's butthurt here? Please sir. It's a game. Maybe if he realized that he would have actually won a season.
