yes, but not that modern poetry that doesn’t rhyme ??? Nor those silly limerick poems, it’s not like one of them. Ohhh and those old Nordic saga poems that go on an on with dark foreboding, kinda not like that either.
Yh ikr the whole crowd is rooting for Murray and he has to just stay calm. Also every time Murray wins a point he just does this stupid fist celebration like he has won the whole of Wimbledon while Federer is just being normal and not celebrating when he wins a point
That's why he was part of the Bog 4 for a while. His stat were staggering aside from the Mayors won, bit then he had his injury and now he is only average good.
@@rodrigoodonsalcedocisneros9266 I don't care that he's not that good anymore, I'm just proud a fellow scotsman won Wimbledon before any Englishman won it lol
@@alexanderstoyanov7464 Probably. Still, it's not whole world. Not sure what fans in Russia have to say about Federer's popularity there, since Medvedev is No2. Fed will certanly be remembered as one of greatest when retired.
***** lol not at all - was a pretty close match - federer was a break up in the first and won the second - would have been totally diff if he has won the first set - djokovic was abit too solid on the day but was not a raping by any means - Wawrinka - djokovic at RG although it 4 sets it was for sure a raping.
This was the first tennis highlight video I’ve seen my freshman year when I barely getting into tennis and Federer is my goat he started it all for me, sad thing though :(
@@MrBird-bk7lb how is goat when he loses to nole all the time and in 2 years rafa and nole will beat all his records. he will lose slam record titles.....weeks at no 1 record......W.F title record.....most slam finals..semis record.....ALL RECORDS to rafa and nole…………….SO HOW IS HE GOAT ? how is he the best in grass when nole humiliated him three times in a row in Wimbledon finals and lead him 3-1 at Wimbledon ? can u explain.....please ?
Me too, Murray was a gifted player …. So sad that he had such bad back/hip problems …. Miss him!! Even though he is back he is not the same power…. Hope he will get there, miracles can happen!! 🎾
@@Stampingerms To be honest, Murray himself ruined his career. At French Open 2017 itself, it was clearly evident that something was definitely wrong with him. In Wimby 2017, he was literally limping, and not able to play. He should have stopped that moment itself and undergone necessary treatment but, without listening to his body he went on to play almost everything that year through injury. So, I'm not surprised to see where he is today. But yes, it's nice to see a player's career go down because of some injury.
@@codygarton3346 Federer probably will finish his career soon , Nadal is one year older of Djokovic but probably still unbeatable on Roland Garros , so Djokovic will be last standing GOAT against youngsters .
@@laurent___4431 No not compared. But he was at their level in his prime no doubt about it. I see Wawrinka and del Potro at a level below Murray. Murray have 6 gs-finals, 3 titles, 2 olympic golds and 676-199 in singleresults. Wawrinkas singleresults is 530-306. Del potros singleresult is 439-173. Murray is a heavier player in my book.
@@darrelcrossan9025 That is correct. I read on wikipedia and they have missed two finals. 11 finals it is. And 46 ATP-titles! Wawrinka have 16 titles and del potro have 14 titles. Nadal have 88 titles. Its very easy to underrate Murray because he have had so much problems with injuries. To give an historical context: Pete Sampras have 64 titles. Murray is not very far from that tennislegend.
Wow this is an example of a Federer azz kisser) as well as the ridiculous amount of thumbs up. Federer isn't even a top5 (maybe even 10) returner of all-time. Combine that with (and more important) Murray not having some amazing serve how impressive is your statistic?
The absolute pinnacle of Tennis as a sport remains Roger Federer on the grass courts of Wimbledon. There is no finer sight to behold. Effortlessly exquisite.
+ShowdownPlease Federer is loved at wimbledon obviously but the crowd seems more on murray's side in this, and the crowd is split when it comes to federer and murray at wimbledon.
I think some of it is just loving to see great tennis. To come back from 40 love down is remarkable and you have to root for the comeback kid in that scenario.
Having been at Wimbledon when Murray is playing I can tell you, the crowd favours him even over Federer. Only just though, federer fans are impressively loyal.
it would have been more or least even given Rodgers popularity over a decade or so. Whereas Murray is Scottish and is not loved by a Wimbledon crowd as Henman was, which is no big deal to MurrayMurrays game is at its best right now, even if Novak did get through to this years final Andy would have beaten himI just hope Murray wins 2 more majors to add to his 2 , Davis cup gold and Olympics , being in 11 finals he should have on 2[at least] more majors. When he wins this years Wimbledon and adds another he can say he is a great at a time of an all time great era
CameramanI88 Exactly. To me, that was a defining moment that showed Murray's quality as a player. I just hope it doesn't fly under the radar, because for him to come up with that was world-class. Even though he ended up losing, but hey, it was vs. the GOAT. Murray has the most vulnerable second serve of the Top 5, it's the weakest aspect of his game. So many excellent players have all lost sets in the majors on a double fault. Even as great a player as Nadal double-faulted to lose the second set of the Aussie Open 2012 vs. Djokovic. Andy lost, but he didn't just roll over and give it to Roger on a silver platter. No one would blame him after missing his first serve 40-love down. He's supposed to lose that set. But he still fought like a demon and made Roger take the set over his dead body. That's worthy of respect.
doh. yes there are. i guess it felt like there weren't since they were minimal, usually only one angle. compared to the hotshot highlights i mostly watch.
Murray and Wawrinka were pretty much the only guys who were ever able to tackle Federer, Djokovic and Nadal in best of 5 their primes, and even then only very rarely. Murray was incredibly consistent until his injury set in; he made the quarter-finals or further at almost every slam for like, 7 years, and it was almost always one of the Big 3 that beat him. This game shows exactly why. Murray shows incredible mental strength here; that second serve ace at 0-40 down, etc. He was a brick wall for pretty much everyone else
The last time Fed actually played a rival close to his age at Wimbledon was the 09 Final against Andy Roddick. Since then he has had to play big matches against players 4,5 and 6 years younger than him, which in tennis terms is a generation. He still managed to make it to 3 Wimbledon Finals since and won it in 2012. At 34, he floats around on that court as if his bones were made of air pockets. He is playing as if he is 1.5 in the world and John McEnroe has recently changed his opinion of the GOAT, by giving it back to Fed. You'd be insane not to agree.
DaSnarky Remarky I would agree however in the final he was considerably poorer despite having an easier passage to the final. He can produce the odd great match like against Murray but can no longer back it up I be surprised if he wins another slam.
Josh Jones I don't think that's determinate. Federer still has a pretty decent h2h against Djokovic outside of the major slams. He just beat Djokovic at Dubai. What he needs to do is win that first set and make Djokovic lose a little bit of his footing. He lost his serve (through no fault of his own), and essentially couldn't muster enough convincing dominance to be in that position again. I think Federer, if he keeps going at the rate he's going, will have the longevity of an Agassi (playing until he's 38) and find his chance in a year or so to grab another Wimbledon or US Open
I was looking at this today. They keep on zooming in to some other "celebs" there also. Funny to know that 5 years later Roger Federer is a Billionnaire !!! just by chasing a tennis ball around all his life. Not bad eh !
Federer in his prime was the best that has ever played the game. Sure, Djokovic and Nadal have more slams on paper, but the sheer genius, variety, and finesse of Federer's play for a stretch of years in the 2000's was the best the sport has ever seen imo.
Watching feds forehand and backhand now it was fantastic. I am glad to have been able to watch the begining of Feds career when he beat Sampras, his rise and domination after that. Also the way he made Rafa step up and then Novak with Murray also improving. I do not think we will see such an era again for a while with the rivalry and comradary that those 4 had. Making each other step up every time. The current generation wont understand, but the stats are there. For those 3 to win 67 of the grand slams in total says a lot. Then there is Murray and Warinka who raised their levels on some occassions to win a few, but consistency that these three Novak, Roger and Rafa showed and for some still showing, is just amazing. To put everything in perspective, only Medvedev (1 slam) and Thiem (1 slam) have one slams outsde of Roger, Novak, Rafa, Murray and Warinka in the past 2 decades. I must also say, that the Rafa and Roger story is fantastic and needs to be made into a movie. From Roger dominating to Rafa starting at a young age and adapting to be a fierce rival to becoming very close freinds. Watch their last game together during the team Europe v USA, Rogers farewell, when they both cried and u will understand how close they are. Currently I think the guard is changing again with Alcaraz, who seems like the real deal. He already has a slam at 19 and also has one of those nadalesque type of game. Lets see what happens, but i won't be suprised if he gets 10 slams.
It's a shame that Andy isn't at his level at this moment. I loved it when both Murray and Federer were playing against each other. I have seen them both live and it's a privilege to watch the inspiration and dedication both players put into winning. Hats off to both players.
Murray's anticipation and movement back into the court at 12:25 is amazing. He's heading directly towards the ad side service box BEFORE the ball has crossed the net on his side - he knows that's Fed's only real option with the ball dropping low. Fed's going short and back across the court - should be a winner - but Murray was on it and rolled it down the line. Amazing court IQ.
lol super basic to readjust after his court is so open. then easy to see that fed is playing a stop. not special to sprint after that strike at all to be honest.
For sure, so much so, that it's *discriminatory*. ...and so, in the future, such shots will be banned because BLM, LBGTQI+ rights etc, etc. bla bla bla .. :) :) :) :) ha ha. :) :)
I love the fact that two players can bring out the best in one another. I love tennis because it’s not just a physical game; it’s psychological and as we have seen many times over the years, a player’s mental state can change the course of a match. I will miss Wimbledon so much this year because it’s the highlight of my year here in the UK. I work long hours and so cannot watch a lot of tennis outside of the UK but I do try to watch as much as I can. Having these matches on RU-vid means that I can enjoy them over and over again so thanks 😊
+Agent N Did you see the match? Andy didn't play well or good or whatever. He played bad. You see it in the score, straight sets. I mean, Roger played AMAZING, one of the best matches of his career for sure, but he won easily because andy wasn't playing good, thats a fact. If andy had played like he did in australia, or miami, or in the clay tournaments (I mean at that level), I think this match would've been a lot more close
***** Vintage Federer's been fleeting since '12. Age has already caught up him with mentally; is starting to affect him physically too. I don't see Federer winning Wimbledon in his current physical state. I'd rather he focus his energies on winning the one major honour that's eluded him - Olympic singles gold.
15 minutes to hold. Then Fed comes back hits 2 aces,service winner,forehand her and holds in about 52 seconds. Incredible how blowing this many break points and losing such a tough games seemingly had no affect on him. Just steps back to the line and goes to work. Only other player I can think of that could have done this is Borg and maybe Sampras.
In a similar manner when we speak about a taugh character, we should also not forget the name of Novak Djokovic especially when we speak about the mental strength of such great tennis players of all time. We just need to have a look at the 2018 wimbledon semifinal and 2019 wimbledon final in order to satisfy ourselves at this particular point of how big a mental giant he is...
@@messithegoat9636 Novak is a great player on paper but is not half the man, person nor style and finesse of Fed. He could win 40 slams and still be a total c*nt lol.
Man, Andy had absolutely no self control in this match! Visually showing his frustration after each error. I think he's gotten much better at reigning himself in so far this year.
It's so tragic Roger's 2015 season coincided with Djokovic's career best season. Really feel like he should've picked up at least one major and a slew of other titles. I thought for sure he'd win Wimbledon with how incredibly solid he was in tournament especially in this match
Djokovic is just ruthless. I'm a Federer fan all the way so my views are probably a little biased but I don't really feel like Novak has ever been the most talented player in the world at any point in his career. What he does have is immense athleticism, consistency, mentality and probably the best return game in history. He's living proof that hard work beats talent. It will be interesting when the big three all retire because I think a lot will come out about Djokovic's mind games etc..
@@GiovanniGiorgio74 Fed was built to win, Novak not to lose. Not losing is a little more effective way to win, it would seem...even though it does not look as good in highlight reels.
@Márton Bálint we all know that djokovic is the best clutch player he can play really well in these situations and ı think both players are under their normal level
Fed's reaction time/ability to predict & read where people hit amazes me. I swear at 1:38 that fed already takes a step to cover the backhand before Murray actually hits the ball
@@SuperYtc1 He's as fixed as he can be. Andy's problem is he should be playing like Fed in his late 30ties, not like Gilles Simon in his prime. I mean he should go for broke on all-out attack not retrieve every ball like Caroline Wozniacki in her best years. Old dogs never change.
murray was such a great ball striker, one of the greatest ever. such a shame watching his body break down. loved watching him blasting rockets off both wings, often from sub-optimal positions.
