Absolutely. I have happily gone from a px 6.5 130 x stiff to a tensei 70g stiff in some of my irons recently. With some joint issues to deal with, it can make sense
I think generally (and not specifically to Lee) that its an ego thing..... how many people are convinced they are a stiff shaft or X-stiff because they believe they're a swing speed monster.... whereas the reality is something different. But I'm 100% with you.... why find something that easy/consistent and then change it.
@@geraldhemming never really had an issue with launch, I am a very high ball hitter anyway! Simply arthritis in my shoulder meant that the day after playing with heavy/stiff steel was painful. I still swing my 7 iron at around 90 miles an hour as I mentioned in my recent fitting article so would be “dry fit” into something like my px, perhaps a little lighter. As you say though, it isn’t all about swing speed and something that “shouldn’t” work, often does.
I agree why mess with shaft if the club does what you are looking for results wise you don’t right club or specs just a number. Remember lowest score wins
Brand name is unimportant as long as the club works for you. Keep it in your bag and I wouldn’t change the shaft or grip, you’re striking it very well, so why change anything? Cheers.
If it ain't broke why mend it ? Why change the shaft ? Is it out innate snobbery to have a named brand, or, a stiffer shaft ? If it had say Titletiest and stiff marked on the shaft we would be buying it by the bucket loads Good thought provoking video, which shows our innate sobbery over golf products
There is no reason it wouldn’t be legal but would need to check against the R&A list. No idea how long it will last unless it’s used and someone can tell us
