@@bakedsynth3447 You can see the camber increase on the front wheels when less weight is being applied through them. Later in the test they don't even touch the ramp.
@@TheMrDarius That doesn't matter, you clearly don't understand what you're talking about, just like most people who talk about this. It's one of the most misunderstood topics in cars out there because you all look at only one aspect of the whole system. Just because you went past the point of peak torque with the engine, doesn't mean you shouldn't rev above it. You should, because the power still increases, and the revs still increase with the same gear ratio, giving you more torque at the wheels than shifting up into next gear and dropping lower in the rev range, even if in higher gear you have more torque at the crank because the engine is in the rev range with more torque, that torque is going into a higher gear with a longer gear ratio. Point is, driving in 3rd gear at 4000 rpm with 200 Nm at the crank gives you more usable torque at the wheels than driving at the same speed but in 4th gear at 2000 rpm with 350 Nm at the crank. Why do you think diesel cars that always have peak torque below 2000 rpm are still revved to 4000-4500 rpm to get the best acceleration? Or why every NA petrol engine achieves peak torque at halfway through the rev range but still has to be revved higher to achieve best acceleration? Or why turbo petrol engines achieve peak torque at 1500 rpm but are still revved to 6000+ rpm to get the best acceleration? That's why.
I think a good way to to weight tests would be to use the slow speed course, and make a loop from there, that way it's not a test of pure power but the brakes and you have a more natural test of what the truck may actually see, where momentum and corners are more prevalent and where they can help and hurt the car respectively
@@autoshitnl2852 yes that’s exactly the problem, his driving style would impact the results as would it vary from run to run, whereas these tests are completely independent of his driving style, or something like loosing control
The Stambecco has become my favorite vehicle. Not very fast, but so much fun to drive. Can lift-off oversteer basically on demand, and isn't that difficult to catch again. Goes almost anywhere. Tweaked up one based on the 4WD ragtop diesel variant.
Transit range is irrelevant, when you're measuring a max towing rep. Just the same, if you were relocating that much freight...you'd want a second fuel tank, if you were pulling frequent grades. The .29mpg extreme, would factor in. 🙃
@@stevie-ray_two-first-names IIRC big semi truck engines get their peak torque anywhere from 950-2200 rpm only, which is crazy considering that's like, only a quarter or third of what cars get 😂
@B MAD depends on tuning and were you can find efficiency, for example a truck needs that torque always and will want to run efficiently at low rpm, a good example is Scanias 16.4L V8 producing 770hp and 3700NM between 1000 and 1500 RPM in a truck configuration, but the exact same engine with new turbos can output 1200hp and 4100NM at 1700 RPM in a marine configuration were the engine has more available cooling and were the power isn't needed until higher RPM
they dont have a dolly 5th wheel mod you can get to tow a semi trailer instead? idk how much that would help tbh since its to torque raising the wheels not the weight
I just saw the first part 10 minutes ago, I chaked your channel and the second part wasn't posted . A few minutes later my RU-vid recomands the second part
Hi! Can you please duplicate all the information in the metric system? I'm just from Russia and therefore I can't understand the meaning of the indicators
1.6129 km/h for every 1 mph (e.g. 62 mph is 100 km/h) 0.907 metric tons for every 1 imperial ton 6.895 kPa for every 1 psi 1.356 newton-meters for every 1 foot-pound 0.986 brake horsepower for every 1 imperial horsepower This should cover every unit of measurement used in these types of videos. I use both, and even I can admit it’s a pain in the ass sometimes.
@@twotwentietwo It’s a vanilla asset. Been a while since I played but I think you hold left ctrl and the nodes should appear. Use the mouse to connect/drag nodes.
@@historyfan0651 Puch 500 is a Fiat 500 built under licence by an austrian manufacturer. That fact aside, the Piccolina is more of a blend of a Fiat 600 and a Volkswagen Type 1 (Beetle)
@@historyfan0651 It has the same Swing Axles like the Pinzgauer, the same Portal Axles as the Pinzgauer, the interior is almost 1:1 copied from the Pinzgauer, it has the same production years as the Pinzgauer… do I need to list another 15 things for you to believe us that this is in fact a Pinzgauer?
@@standardheat-fs8159 I hadn’t the seen the interior! Also, the pinzgauer seems a bit smaller, aulthough I could be wrong. The stambecco doesn’t have the multiple oil pumps of the pinzgauer.
