The Marvels Will Save Disney 

It'll save them from themselves. Less money for future projects.

I will say Brie Larson is a lot less annoying the last few years. And goodness, Rachel zegler is such a villain I MISS the Brie Larson days..

Bro are you ok ?

Respect Wahmen 🙏 🫡

Dude, seriously, paragraph breaks.

When you "respec" Brie can you put more points into charisma?

​@erikhermansen3431 or intelligence? Least they would understand why they're movies are 💩

@@erikhermansen3431 maybe even wisdom so she stops making the same mistakes over and over too

It's not bad! I'm thankful Brie said she didn't make movies for 40 year old white dudes.

That’s also why I didn’t watch Black Panther 2

Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Chris Pratt Yeah definitely hot strong guys to save the world.

What women don't want to see is some insufferable b*tch that we can't identify with and reminds us of every Mean girl from our school days , I just want Thor to get his shirt off 👍

So what if you saw a strong woman superhero like wonder woman that's likable

They're rare and even more rarely well written without being the XX version of an existing male hero

Correct. This and also another incidental fact that whilst comments about looks might seemingly come from men towards women, the vast majority of actual shaming and commentary about looks about women come from women.

They spent roughly three whole movies showing Stark’s engineering process, with trial and error, all while maintaining a relationship, balancing his publicity, and fighting villains. Captain Marvel just showed up.

God I want the good old proper POC and Female actors...Nowadays seems like they are their just to pander for diversity sake with none of the writing or acting being good. Especially since growing up I watched a ton of Black lead movies and shows...And nowadays they talk about how Blacks haven't been represented in media for a long while.

Kiddo

brie should do a romance film w Buck

i binge watched a bunch of female lead fantasy: underworld, kill bill, alien, aeon, terminator... just to remind myself that hollywood does know how to make good female characters, they just choose not to. someone needs to use the clip from Willow of the, "not a woman!!" whenever they show a man trying to use their authority.

Well Kill Bill was also drek, but I certainly understand your point

Comics, games, action movies, I am probably forgetting a few things.

As a 50 year old white guy that read "Wrinkle in Time" in elementary school, read it to my kids decades later, I think I can say I with some authority that the movie sucked as an adaptation.

@@Kyle-sr6jmthe nerve of that wench to claim the movie adaptation of a book meant for all kids wasn’t made for a specific demographic of people she doesn’t like is mind boggling. I was part of the target demographic she preferred when that movie came out, I did watch it (because my grandma, who read the book as a child, wanted to), and none of us liked it.

@@darrekworkman5595 Women ruin everything. I havent seen a single example of an industry, a hobby or a company that was improved by giving more power to women. They always make it all about themselves. I know people get offended when i say this, but i dare anyone to prove me wrong.

​@@DannyDevitoOffical-TrustMeBro"wench" "ego maniac". An actual feminist would rip this movie apart.

Now that's just mean. ;)

Heras dumptruck saved Star Wars

@@newhybrid101 it’s going to take more than a single bakery to save Star Wars at this point

@@newhybrid101 I'd like Hera's dumptruck to save me, It would be a delight to empty out my emotions into it.

Only Azoka can save Star Wars now!

Finally an actual objective comment. Not like those other sexists 😭

You also need to know how to not act like the villian, if you're supposed to be the hero that everyone should root for.

They also are really good at playing the victim

@@Senorbenignhillarity That is because that is what they believe themselves to be. It's not acting when the people on screen are just playing themselves pretending to be someone else lol

A lot of actors (and other people) nowadays are so shallow and arrogant that they can't understand why people want to see actual good, well done characters versus them. They're not interesting themselves and they can't possibly act out an interesting character because they can't act. All they want is to be a celebrity onscreen to inflate their egos and bank accounts and they don't care about the audience or the movie or the legacies they're destroying and actively hate everything and everyone, and are miserable for it Anyway those are my thoughts 😅

Abandon hope, all ye who enter here.

Why do people capitalise words for dramatic emphasis like they're working for a tabloid rag or a clickbait farm? Silly.

@@Blisterdude123 Probably the same reason Retarded people comment on the larger txt.

I know a lot of disney adults who feel this way… South Park hit the ball out of the park by whos to blame for the movie disasters.

@@WhySoLoud Obama? The only thing he changed was having BIG MIKE as a husband.😀

Imagine the tragedy off Disney earning money by making good movies. The horror.

Money, what's that ? I've heard of it.

Noble venture for anticapitalists.

@@LukasJampenWhere are these good movies you speak of?

This is the stunning and brave way

"...complete freedom (no family to care for) always look so miserable..." You've answered your own question, but the feminists don't like that you did...

Yeah, the only good vvhamens is a man according to modern effinists, so they can't smile, because that's sm3xist, and they have to look stoic like a man.

Such a great comment

"attractive"??? PFFFF HAHAHAHA 😂🤣

Complete freedom and no family to care for sounds absolutely miserable

Man, they even did female heroes better back then. Sigourney Weaver as Ripley in Aliens was badass.

Remember Beatrix Kiddo? Remember the Bride?

The Mommy, a classic action film.

I love evil Women Thors sister played evil SO well. This chick looks like a lost puppy. Lolol I don’t watch the movies for the hot men. It doesn’t hurt I just want to see them play like a comic brought to life. It’s really not a difficult thing to do it’s not.

It's insufferable that some women writers & Kathleen Kennedy think that all women want is to see women on screen. It's rather insulting.

Hollywood, 'now' one of the 'many' places creativity goes to die.

shallow clueless political hollyweird where only movies that get made if they have a woke liberal brainwashing message as usual

Your #3 made me 🤣! Thx 🤭

@drunkdealer583. So can Rapunzel. Lol

You lost it, the cars and boobs scene was from before, when she was under the impression boobs could counter all the issues she took to the table. As the boobs fall the cars rise some years later

Lol

@@alberto5770 She can still save her movies by being sexy and showing off her boobs.

Stunning... Brave...

I shall NEVER be WORTHY !

Actually it was “I am all the women” but yeah, my jaw dropped. Oscar winning scene

yes. it gives me chills, douche chills

I loved it when she shouted, "ITS MARVELIN' TIME!", and then marvs all over the entire audience. It was one of the moments of all time.

What they brought the space cat back! Wasn't he the main character in the first movie?

Disney thinks people like doing homework. Narcissistic tendencies run abound within that company. Nope, they need to collectively stop drinking their own farts.

@@darrekworkman5595 Space cat wants Fury's other eye! Rawr!

It truly is one of the movies ever made.

what could go wrong amirite?

Lol

I feel for you, after watching the movie, I had no fucking Idea what I just watched... I never read the book but I seriously doubt it's anything like the movie... 😂

Now that's a brilliant comment 😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂

The villain in this movie has the other one of Kamala's magick bracelets and much of the plot is about her trying to complete the set so she'll have more power. My understanding is that they end up all being affected because they all have 'light-based' powers. Yes, I think it's silly too.

Captain Marvel got her powers being exposed to way too much energy from an infinity stone and Photon walked through an energy wall made by somebody empowered by an infinity stone. So the logical connection seems to be the infinity stones, though CM and Wanda were not exposed to the same one. So I would expect Ms Marvel in the MCU or her bracelets to also be connected to an infinity stone.

@@davidgantenbein9362 No, Wanda's powers are MAGIC, they are not FROM the Mind stone. It's made quite clear her powers are HERS, not the stone. The experiments with the Mind stone did not bestow powers, they just alerted her to them, and gave her a place to practice. Wanda's powers are also MAGIC, Witchcraft specifically, and the Infinity Stones are not.

@@Mereologist ......Why the fuck is she stealing The Mandarin's shtick!? The Rings in the MCU aren't even ACTUAL RINGS, they're fucking magic bracelets too! And if she and the baddie both have these rings which could logically share a connection, how come THEY don't swap back and forth?! That would actually be an interesting plotline they could ruin. The baddie and the hero literally trading places at unpredictable times, neither one knowing who the other even is yet so the hero needs to figure out how the fuck to handle suddenly being in this villain's lair at random basically. And the villain needs to decide how to navigate this strange world and discover how to either break this strange connection, or track it down to steal whatever is powering it and grow stronger. Disney could REALLY fuck that up, but no, instead we get "Duuuuuuuuur light?" For a story that does a body swapping concept VERY well, give Yumi and the Nightmare Painter by Brandon Sanderson a read. Excellent book that Brandon wrote literally in his spare time and is better than literally everything Disney has produced in the last oh 5 or so years put together.

@@haku8135 Not what the second Avengers movie showed. So where do you get the idea that her powers didn’t originate with the mind stone? Remember, this isn’t comic book Wanda, this is MCU Wanda.

Yes... like little kids, they'll all be playing the blame game and pointing fingers... My own "favorite"... "It's the fans' fault!! Reeeee!"

I don't know, a lot of billions have flown around, lately. Government spending. I wouldn't put it past Disney to pad this one the way they do other failed films

@@matthewmosier8439 I'm expecting them to try, even said myself a few weeks ago they'd probably buy up tickets like they did last time, they'll move money from D+ to Marvel for "streaming rights" like they've done with everything post-Endgame & pull every other trick in the book to make it look successful on paper but I'm not sure if it's going to be enough this time. Captain Marvel was wedged between Infinity War & Endgame when the MCU hype was at critical mass but The Marvels doesn't have anywhere near that type of help, the public goodwill for the franchise has tanked so has public perception of Disney as a company, stock is at a 10 year low & now they're running defence after the South Park episode & Gina bodying them on Twitter. It's not looking good 😂😂

They found it long ago. But seriously Southpark nailed it with that special.

Is the panderstone a seventh infinity stone? I don't know about the MCU, but this universe seems to have one.

@@darrekworkman5595that’s very perspicacious. I’d like to see a skit with Thanos getting that stone.

The Pander Stone was in the WW84 movie, it was totally the Wishing Stone!

​@@brockdavid EXACTLY! It's the same thing!

I'd rather watch that than any Disney Star Wars.

Stir, whip, stir, whip, whip, whip, stir!

I agree. That moment is where I started to question the MCU's direction. Phase 4 was a shitshow with some minor bright spots but Phase 5 is off to a bad start with Ant Man 3. Kang is a complete joke and the MCU deserves to fail at this point. Kevin Feige has destroyed his own franchise.

Yes, that was a grating moment that was completely unnecessary but a portent of what was to come.

It's gonna be TIGHT!

@@DubaiShortsChannel barely an inconvinience

Oh really?

You don't have to justify a girl saving a guy to that point, my God! The girl is the bodyguard and it isn't enough that the guy is her VIP, a prince, but he has to suffer from several(!) illnesses. There's nothing wrong with a girl saving a guy if (a) she is established as a person brave enough to do such a thing, she doesn't even have to be trained and (b) the guy is unable to defend himself, not necessarily for lack of skills but it might be due to the circumstances (he can't see the danger, he doesn't have a weapon, he is busy fighting with another enemy). Or he is more important than the woman in question, like him being the prince. Usually it's women who are saved because they are seen as more important than men (due to them giving birth). But a woman saving a man is fine. There's only a problem when women are constantly saving men but men can never save women.

@@missAlice1990 Alright, my exaggerated wording there. None of those factors exist to justify the scene, they all relate deeply to the rest of plot and it just happened that the scene fit neatly considering all of them. I totally agree with you, you can definitely have such an event happen in any number of ways as long as it makes sense. If I put my character's sister in the scene instead, for example, it wouldn't work because she just wouldn't do that, but his cousin would, despite the fact all she would contribute would be serving as a human shield. It all comes down to how you establish them, not even just for women. Think Momohime in Muramasa the Demon Blade, her whole side of the story happens because she jumps in front of a blade to save the guy she was going to marry, and she's virtually useless in any physical struggle. Little edit, and referring more to the point from the video. Off the top of my head, I'd say the difference in the most typical portrayals of the "out of impulse" sacrifice between men and women, without considering established personalities, is that when a man does it, he's a great person. When a woman does it, she really loves the person she's protecting.

Clever👋

Or reading through the comments on that reaction.

The MCU is pretty much burnt rubber

More girl bosses. MORE. MORE!!!!

Basically, no. With the exception of a couple of gems, like Spider-Man: no way home, which you have to credit Sony in part for, and guardians of the Galaxy, three everything that has come out since avengers: endgame has pretty much been average to just flat out sucks!

@@chasehedges6775 Or a long wet fart.

@@EVGriffinJr 💯💯

She has to over-act to compensate for Brie's lack of expression

can we even be sure its Nick fury and not one of the million skrulls around? even skrulls cant tell.

@@edwxx20001Who cares? Nick Fury got properly ruined by Secret Invasion and Captain Marvel, so who cares about the biggest loser the MCU has to offer (besides always dying Kang that is)?

@@davidgantenbein9362 im sure kang will die a few more times before we get to kang dynasty where kang will die a lot of more times.

@@edwxx20001 Kind of strange to base all hope for the MCU on a villain that is constantly losing. Is the idea that we side with Kang in the next Avengers movie and hope he gets at least one win in? Maybe even killing off most of the unliked heroes the MCU shoved in during phase 4 & 5? I really don’t get the idea. I know, some older comic books did also feature a multitude of Kangs, but the good Avengers books of the past always had a main Kang being the major threat in those (often manipulating or even murdering his own variants). But with the MCU there seems to be no real Kang threat around, just a couple of villains finding their death everywhere. And if they try to throw in a last minute „this is the real Kang“ for Kang Dynasty, it will not work, because they built up the opposite. Not to mention that the original Kang Dynasty comic book story had not a single Kang variant or copy or any such thing (there was only one character with „variants“ in that book and those were clones instead of multiverse variants). …. but then again, there is absolutely zero chance that the MCU even gets close enough to that comic book.

Yes! And Heels vs Babyface, xxx

Outside of disparu and heels, those are grifting karens. Dont worry I already told them before they deleted the comment. Cowardly anti sjws cant handle green m/ms

JLongbone, Little Harpoon and Mauler

Same boat mate, have been getting my "modern" entertainment exclusively from them for some years now...

Hopefully the ghost of Adam Yauch goes full 'Conjuring' on the writers or whoever decided to butcher the Beastie Boys' music!

@@Adamguy2003 i.m sure he has better things to do than bother with that ;p also they seem to be doing a good enough job of messing things up for themselves xD

At least the dead one isn’t around to see it

politics over storytelling! I watched 2 different videos about modern writers for both Marvel and DC!most self inserted characters and couldnt be more gay, most gay people wants to be by themselves I think, these writers are the most self righteous who cant take critique!they even made Joker pregnant!

Well you could always start collecting something more valuable than modern comics.... Funko pops for example...

@@erikhermansen3431 not a bad shout

Beanie Babies would be a better investment

my dad had shit loads of comics i hope he sold them years back

you can't explain away human nature, though, effective characters don't work like that. there's little if any reason to bastardize psychological basises to make a character not ring true when you could just write a character that makes sense in the first place. it's not subverting our expectations, it's just bad writing, being contrary for zero gain. the laws of the universe can be altered to fit a story, the laws governing a person not so much without repercussions on how good that character is.

​@@ryanbarker5217so are you saying it's against human nature for a woman to jump infront of a man to protect them, like...

@@kungawogcelu9898 yeah, there are thousands of videos of someone being accosted on the street by a thug and a woman jumping in to save the day. right? a woman will protect her kid like that for sure, otherwise all that feminist bullshit flies out the window when the ship is sinking and it's women and children first. ain't never gonna happen, never has happened to save some guy who, in our society, is considered disposable and has a duty to be the one to sacrifice himself. if it was to save the king or a group, maybe that would make some sense. i would have bought the idea that she attacked the attacker, but the notion she's going to jump in front of a spear is beyond plausibility except in feminist writer's mind. it's why the man is cowering in fear for his life, because men in these movies have to be depicted as weak and needing rescued by the wahmens who are depicted as strong because they've taken on the traits of men. don't get me wrong, chicks are violent af in a ton of situations, irl typically involving those of a certain socio-economic bent. or if you're a karen being arrested for DUI, if body cam videos are anything to go by. to suggest it's a woman's nature to take a bullet for a man is laughable. in this instance, if the 'writers' wanted to build that character up to do that in a plausible way, fine and good luck with that, but here it's simply pushing an agenda/narrative that doesn't ring true because we know it's vastly unlikely to be true. you want to argue that a woman can be heroic, and of course that can be true, but it's so unlikely in this kind of a situation that it's not worth arguing. the whole 'ride or die' thing is greatly a myth. getting into a fight over a dude happens on the daily, just not sacrificing their lives for them intentionally. why these kinds of characters are so unlikeable and don't feel real is because we know otherwise and realize they're just female empowerment roles, it's why they're all mary sues.

@@ryanbarker5217 can you show me where this description of human nature is recorded? Because I rather suspect that you're just projecting your perspective, and that's not "human nature". I will grant that in the clip on screen when Drinker makes this point (and again, it's a minor disagreement IMO) does seem odd or uncommon, but there's no context to the situation. Maybe she's just a very protective person, or maybe she's suicidal. Maybe he's a vulnerable or differently abled. Any of these things can easily account for her defensive action for him. Or heck, maybe she just really loves him - people (men and women both) sacrifice themselves for their loved ones all the time. Just because you expect men to take bullets as some sort of psychotic machismo bullshit doesn't make it human nature.

@@Themohr i don't need to go find where it's recorded, instead why don't you go find me examples of where a woman took a bullet to the chest or a knife to the gut protecting a man. if there's context to the situation in the movie, hell if i see it, so i can only look at what's given and apply that to the context clues. but, yes, men are expected to sacrifice themselves to protect women. was you not raised as a male or something? men are considered disposable. our *job* is to protect women. ask any women what one of the most important things are when choosing a mate and she's going to say security. when you see a bad situation, show me where a wife is draped over the husband to protect him instead of the other way around. c'mon, do you seriously believe your own nonsense or just being contrarian? so, you're agreeing with the drinker, just not with me basically saying the same thing?

type up online Brie Larson's feet. and get ready to be blown away

Least she has boobs to look at, gotta give her that

I'm not sure if the other comments that are invisible are anything like this, but that clip for sure is meant for men of culture. If anything can win the male fanbase back, it is her 2 superpowers.

This video is sarcastic. "Saving the MCU" means destroying it. It just needs to end. Let them go out with a peaceful bang. Guardians 3 was IMO an epilogue to the final hero team of the MCU. It's over, no topping it.

Disney desperately trying to save themselves with cats, Brie and boobs is most hillarious.😂

please don't ever mention those two in the same sentence again. i will get ptsd when i watch sherlock the next time

How sad is it I can't tell if that's a joke?

What can go wrong, you say? The production budget, the casting, the costumes, the sets, the props, the hair and make-up, the acting, the visual effects, and especially the story. Everything that can go wrong will go wrong. That's Murphy's Law for you.

@TerryOnTuesday seriously is that a joke or a real thing? We're honestly past the point of being able to distinguish reality from parody.

My Grandma: I don't care what the history books say....

Another ginger is about to bite the dust. If this happens, I'm not watching it.

…because, you know, Rosalind Franklin, Katherine Johnson and Caroline Herschel (among many others) put their name in their own work…

@@clogs4956 I'm still waiting on Disney to make something out of Anne McAffrey's Pern, Wendy Pini's Elfquest, and pretty much anything Mercedes Lackey has done. They claim they're elevating women, but all they're doing is gender-swapping male characters and destroying the men in the process. It's the HATRED OF MEN that most of us find distasteful, because they're NOT celebrating women creators.

​@@steveouk90126 "empowering women" What they realy do is making women into parasites.

My first thought on seeing her was to wonder if that was supposed to be Storm playing Thor understudy, a role she's played with once or twice in the comics.

"Bless her little heart" The kiss of death from a Southerner

Agreed. I hope she goes on to better things. She does a great job. Even the “oh my god” clip here has more emotion in it than Brie’s entire career.

She’s a sweet kid but the fan girl gimmick is annoying. How many times does she shriek “oh my God” in the trailer alone

She is a good lady but she is just wasting her talent on Crap dying franchise she should do movies other than MCU

No.

RU-vid creators are going to have a great time with this.

i can relate. it's like sitting on the porcelain throne. And waiting for it to come out and it's not

I'm looking forward to Dismal losing a lot of money on it...

She already is. She is definitely a rip off of the villain in the first Guardians of the Galaxy Movie. Down to a smaller version of his hammer.

@@darrekworkman5595 did mean Captain Marvel but I do agree the main villain does have same vibes with Ronin the only reason they could show Thanos in that resent trailer was because she was linked with him oh no her father wasn’t a random surgeon who was killed by Captain Marvel because he held a knife at her and tried to save the human race with a sacrifice of a young girl and she’ll be getting golf clubbed right?

sorry to disappoint, but it's all in the garment

Push-up bra for that scene, for sure.

Purrrfect👋

​@@Kit-kk9cbI would still suck them dry

Yeah, the only women I've ever seen who genuinely like girlbosses have the caveat that they be in supporting roles. They prefer the main at least to be a "real" character. I occasionally have a look around some of the popular female-centric youtube review channels, and so many have issues with how these Disney girls are all the same now, and they ask why can't we have gentle female characters anymore. The enormous backlash last year among women to Netflix girlbossifying Jane Austen's Persuasion says a lot. So I'm not so sure that the female audience really is the target, but that Feige just wants to be seen as supporting feminism.

All fourteen of them. They're going to love it!

The WNBA has worse basketball, but for sure a better story than this movie.

sick burns all around

I wonder how the theaters will fill the other 98% of the seats on its opening night?

I could be wrong but I think her joke was tied to the movie "Cats", not The Marvels.

THANK YOU! I am glad I am not the only one who caught that!

It's blatantly obvious that they went that way. There aren't that many compelling Captain Marvel villains anyway.