@Scott-tv6vche looks so comfortable and content here...as if it's actually his house. Really cozy huh? Make me suspect too. These Brits can reallly manufacture a Faul. 😂 I wonder how is he doing now.
note the mole between his chin and ear . it is not always noticeable but look carefully and you will see it protruding slightly . now watch i want to hold your hand on ed sullivan show and watch as the camera switches to just paul and step thru that segment slowly and again you will see the mole in the same exact spot.
Ik right. I believed it for a short period of time when i was 14. But i was young and gullible. The fact that I'm 20 right now and there's people OLDER than me that believe this is insane
@@MrHotfuzz84 It makes no sense. The scar is there, his facial construction is the same. People say his face is longer but it’s his haircut that makes it seem longer. Especially since his mop top made it appear rounded
This man was the caretaker of Paul’s boyhood home back in 1998, when my family and I were taking a private Beatles Liverpool tour. We made a stop at Paul’s house before it was open to the public. I’ll never forget, as our car pulled up, he was outside raking, and my kids leaped from the car, eyes agog, shouting, “It’s Paul!”
@@ulfibonkers3205 And you would that 100 percent sure Are you deft and blind that Paul alright and i could not give a flying Fck what you think or say THAT IS PAUL McCartney DEAL WITH IT
@@eduardo_astral with a dog and drinking beer on top of it! the queen would have had any one else crucified for doing that!!! he also left the door wide open. the house is in the national trust but it is clearly his house. the dog in the house would be an extreme no no all by itself but was apparently allowed.
Remember when RU-vid would take you down that rabbit hole after watching just 1 vid would open the world to a thousands of crazy unseen footage and unheard stories. Now its completely filled with top 10 this or top 10 that, filled with kids and presenters with spiky hair and the repetition of the word guys over and over again. Its impossible to find old vids now through the millions upon millions of crappy angry virgins making mundane videos of absolutely nothing and no one.
@@danculbert6349 the only reason he can get away with drinking and having his dog in the house is because it is indeed his house. Anyone else trying that would be in deep trouble .
I don't care if this is the real Paul or not, I love the Paul who played the bass line of Something, sang Let It Be, Helter Skelter, and contributed to most of the songs in the Beatles' Music
I met this guy on the Beatles tour in about 2004 or 5. I told him he looked like McCartney and he said if he had a pound for every time someone said that he’d be a rich man
I saw an online article with a picture of some cop in Sweden who saved a cat from a tree or something, and that dude looked exactly like my brother. He and I are both Swedish descendants whose family has been in the US for 150 years. I chalk it up to the tribalism among our earliest ancestors.
I must say that cheeky little move at 1:07 is pure Paul. He's very clean. I really have no idea what this man's claim is, but the mannerisms are spot on.
+Paul Trullinger He even wears a Beatles' style coat and got himself a job as the custodian of Paul's childhood home. This may sound like a wild theory, but I think this guy might be a Beatles fan..
+Paul Trullinger Yep ! You are right. Caught that. And how about later, when the crowd notices that the guy has begun to look and sound like Paul from living there and he says: Well it's a good thing I don't live in Nottingham Cathedral and then he goes "wooooo" which is very Paul-ish. He also tells the kid who's band is playing The Cavern later that night that the Beatles never played the main stage there--like he knows---because he was there in 1962--because he's Paul. Old Paul was kinda shy and humble and more quiet spoken. Current Paul is more into being noticed.
I have heard this gentleman invites Elvis Presley over to play cards whenever he sneaks into town. Sometimes JFK rolls in to join them but Elvis and Paul have to deal the cards for him - that brain injury and all.
1:06 look at his upper lip. Remember the scar that he got from his moped accident. Dig up the Paperback Writer video in the garden to confirm this. Also early Paul spoke with a real Liverpudian accent, this guy has that too. He's a leftie also.
this guy lives in paul mccartneys house in forthlin road he looks after the place for the national trust the tour of mccartneys and lennons house is a must when visiting liverpool
Especially when he makes his eyes big to express something towards the end. That was SO Paul McCartney! And his mannerisms are More old Paul McCartney than Faul. He is SO Spot On! Hmmm
His sense of humour syncs with his slapstick expressions...the faul mccartney doesnt do that...i inly notice it in the old clips...a more playful childlike sense of humour was present ..and is missing in the fauls expressions
No doubt this is the real Paul. Who wouldn't want to give up a multi-millionaire lifestyle in the greatest ever pop band to sup lager every morning on the estate you grew up.
It was not quite like that - he gave up that lifestyle mainly to save millions of pounds (by not having to pay out for illegitimate children) - he did this in late 1966. The beer supping on the estate he grew up in these youtube clips is a fast forward picture of him around 35 years later (quite a lot can happen/change in 35 years!!) - and even this 'Halliday publicity' from around 2001 might be an act/performance of sorts (so that should anyone at that late stage find out that Halliday was the real Paul he could plead poverty and a poor depressing lifestyle having squandered the lot in previous decades so as to again avoid payingh massive back paternity payouts). I think that if most people could effectively deceive the media/public over decades and save millions of their earnings in the process they may well take the opportunity to do so. Had he (the real Paul, Halliday) continued with the multi millionaire lifestyle after 1966 it would not have been seen as financially viable for him to do so, therefore leaving at the end of 1966 made so much more sense all round.
@@matthewwells5449 he did it out of fear for his life after lennon made his stupid jesus comment. George also said christianity was dying right after Lennon's stupid crack. George was nearly stabbed to death in his house by an intruder but his wife protected him and saved his life . We all know what happened to john. Perhaps paul was really the only smart one afterall. The royalty in England are the heads of the christian church and may also be actual descendants of jesus . Those comments made by George and john may have angered paul and caused a physical fight leading to the breakup.
Yes. He wanted out. Too much control, deception, and fame. He might have been in an accident also that helped him leave. Tavistock & MI6 controlled BRANDed band. There were several Paul replacements, and a few John's. John Lennon wasn't the one shot by the way.
Aside from the Paul theories, I use both hands to pick up and hold drinks, but I think in general people may hold their drinks more often in their non dominant hand? That’s how I am mainly. I think it makes sense that with a simple task like “holding” you use your non dominant hand, so your dominant hand can be free for more complex tasks that may arrive. Like signing your name on a credit card receipt at the bar. Not trying to start any trouble! I love conspiracies and the Beatles, so it’s the best of both worlds for me :)
No it's not Paul McCartney (nor is it "Billy"). But someone at the National Trust who hired him as caretaker of McCartney's childhood home certainly had a sense of mischief.
The first Paul could have been from Irlanda. It was in 60's!! Long time ago! And the oficial story says he was from Liverpool but who knows. Maybe it was a plan. Can you prove that the first Paul was from Liverpool?
That's right! Paul had a teeth broken due an accident in bike! Later, appeared another Paul with very good teeth... Who we are really fans of the Beatles know this information. Thanks for mentioning.
I've never seen really convincing evidence that the first paul is dead, but the amount of photos and circumstantial things indicating that the current paul is not the same as the first one is quite compelling. I concur that the current paul is just weird, has said strange things on various shows, has seemingly forgotten that he was one of the beatles founders, and just generally lacks the charm of the first paul.
I liked this guy when I met him. A guy I know who works over at the Cavern said he's a bit of a pain in the arse and goes in and gets quite drunk. I thought it was funny actually thinking back to that after I saw him and his Fosters
He is the original pre-Sgt Pepper Paul, although there may be more. The Beatles were the “Fab” (fabricated) Four, all of them were played by more than one guy, and they all were new guys starting with Sgt Pepper and that’s the Paul we have now. But John Halliday was one of the originals.
The PAUL character gets all of the attention. Both original MacLen duo left and this was the original "Break-up" threat so they had to find new cast members to re-create The Beatles. They were also really supposed to reName the band the SPLHCB but wound up using it for the name of the album but kept the name Beatles. There' a lot of people believing in the "Dead" either the covered Paul Death 1966 or the John media death 1980. All the cast members of MacLen are infact Alive.
@Forensic Files: Paul McCartney Missing Since 1966 You're an idiot. Paul was never replaced. You can't find anyone who looks like paul, and also just so happens to sound exactly like him as well.
@@monkeyballs342 hell yeah you guys are! How'd you know that his height and features changed? By looking at black and white images? By looking at photographs taken at specific angles and in different lighting? Yeah, John was right when he said y'all are "freaks". lmaooo
@@reggie9595 Paul changed for sure but not height or any of that. It's not preposterous that you can change in your 20s and 30s especially under the heavy influence of drugs. Plus you can visibly see Paul slowly change into who they call Faul in images throughout the sixties. It was a slow transition not a replacement or any of that shit.
Bang On - This is probably Paul's Twin brother Mike or a retired Paul double - There was no Paul death or Faul - close - it was Mike the brother The Beatles were created They were an intelligence Op created by the gews that ran it's course promoting Drugs Abortion Anti Christianity and the Occult - Mike could land the high notes and wasn't into the lime light - he married Linda and Lead Wings - In 1966 Paul moved into the spot light without Mike being used as a Double That's according to a very convincing Miles w Mathis - and what a read it is !
@@rocknroll1 he does, and so, it only adds credence to what you would describe is an incredible coincidence that the caretaker of Paul McCartney looks exactly like him
@@rocknroll1 now you’re just being contrary for the sake of it. Even if he isn’t, he most certainly looks like Paul McCartney and more than half of the comments on here are registering the same likeness that I am.
If you look at all the paul vs. faul photo comparisons, the ones where they show all the differences(i.e. the ears, the eyes, height differences, cheek lines, teeth, lip differences, etc...). This guy, at least in this short video, seems to have all the correct “paul” attributes. The first thing I noticed were the ears - faul is always shown with detached ear lobes or just completely fake ears - whereas this guy has the exact same attached lobes as the real paul( and I mean exact). His droopy eyes, eyebrows, cheek lines, nose; even his teeth all appear exactly as you would expect to see in the real paul(obviously accounting for aging). I would bet this guy is exactly the same height as the real paul as well. And what are the odds that someone who looks exactly like the real paul would be the person watching over his boyhood home? It’s the powers that be little inside joke - laughing at the rest of us as they pull off this con. I think the whole car accident thing is just a ruse. My guess is the real paul either didn’t want to be a part in the Tavistock social engineering plan any longer; OR the real paul might not have had the musical chops necessary to pull off the massive change and increase in complexity of the new wave of music Tavistock had planned for the beatles. I was just watching a vid of the comparison of the baselines of the beatles songs over the course of their anthology(from the early bubble gum days through to the end) and the abrupt change in the complexity and difficulty of the bass lines is strikingly obvious(right around the time that the alleged paul/faul change takes place) - it’s like going from a grade school kid playing bass to Geddy Lee of Rush bass overnight. Compare say “please, please me” to “a day in the life” - it’s not played by a person with the same level of musical talent. Anyway, if the real paul is still out there - this guy is him.
I read a Paul McCartney biography and it talked about when the Beatles were famous (1964?) Paul was not happy. - It said “He was the lead singer in the biggest band in the world - How could he not be happy with his lot ?”
This is the furthest reaching nonsense I've ever read. The Beatles were only a band for six years, the last of which was documented in "Let it Be". The entire "Paul is Dead" conspiracy theory revolves around a shady super secret organization that did all sorts of expensive and impossible nonsense because they were adamant on keeping the band alive. The theory even goes so far as to claim John was replaced, too. But the band's tenure immediately disproves that claim; they formed and broke up at their own discretion, and Paul is still making the best music to this day.
He was probably one of the pauls. Probably the one we know as small Paul. It is a known fact that beatles used doubles for public appearances, and even interviews. This guy was probably was one of numerous paul's body doubles. Glad to see he's doing well for himself. :)
@@I....l....I I don't know what to tell you, lots of people think he was either killed or replaced, while I don't believe any of that stuff. I think it is the same guy. They have tried to prove he was replaced, but they only ended up making a fool of themselves. Surely, he has gone through a quite drastic physical change, but if you look really hard and compare pictures of pre 67 paul and after 67 paul, eventually you will see that it is the same man. Differences in height or accent as I have said can be explained by the use of doubles. I mean, pretty much every beatle maniac who was alive back in the early-mid 60s knows the beatles used doubles. :)
My guess is that Halliday is the real Paul and was replaced by Billy Shears in 66 and this was ultimately done for 2 reasons - (1) he (original Paul) wanted out of a life in the limelight and to be able to fully enjoy the millions he'd amassed in a 4 yr period within a life of anonymity and (2) Don't forget also that the original Paul (who I assume is Halliday) was a bit of a player in the early 60s having had a notable number of affairs, resulting in several of these women who suddenly found themselves in the 'family way' claiming he was the father (and obviously looking for a large financial chunk of his fortune). Enter Mr. Shears when he did in 66 and suddenly - would you believe it - Paul is not the father of any of these illegitimate kids and is home and dry. Makes you wonder who is? - it would mean that in all these alleged cases (of which there were at least 5 or 6) (1) the woman concerned was doing the dirty on the upcoming 60s male rockstar by sleeping with someone else (in each case we never know who) and was happy to be seen so by the international media and (b) all the women apperaed to be happy to let the real father (if not mcCartney) 'off the hook' in each instance - for me this simply just doesn't add up. The bottom line is that McCartney both needed (and wanted) out by 66 to capitalise financially on a huge amount of money and so it is likely a deal was struck with the band and Shears to enable this to happen (plans were probably put in place a year-18 months beforehand to ensure this operation went as smoothly and professionally as possible and without the public noticing/thinking to ask questions about unusual appearances/possible replacements as the Band moved into the flowerpower era). That is what I think happened and what I think Heather Mills also discovered some years back and is barred from discussing openly.
Yes, this too me seems plausible. And would explain what MAY be instances of OrigiPaul still showing up in studio, and the band teasing the fabs, and would explain why some people swear blind that it's origipaul singing let it be wuth the heavy beard.
So Mr Matthew Tyler - what is your view on this? Let's hear your theory, it is very easy to utter bollocks someones viewpoint, let's see if you have anything interesting to say on this matter other than 2 words or maybe that is the extent of your vocabulary. What in particular of what I said do you disagree with and why?
@@matthewwells5449 Halliday looks and sounds nothing like Paul ever did, you can't even get my name right so I can't trust much if any of your research.
@@MarbleThumbs I'm not asking you to 'trust my research' - fuck off you complete numpty if you don't like what's being said - or at least let's here your own theory - exactly - you don't seem to even have one - just want to criticize other peoples' views - whats is your theory for all the changes post 66 - the music, Pauls looks, winning every paternity test against him, the album art clues, the distancing from the other the 3 and so on and so on - come on tell us your view or don't you have one
Paul McCartney had a Babyface...and, you don't lose it with the years. Compare his face with the current Paul who definitely doesn't and never did have a Babyface.
It's him! The minute I set eye's on him, I knew! God bless you dear sweet Paul! I'm so very happy that you are alive! And just as handsome as ever! ❤😀😁😊😍🤩🤗❤
I kind of actually believe this could be possible mates...Fed up with Beatle mania and tired of the publicity and went to the boss and said " I want a replacement" I want my roots back... Possible I think... although mostly not likely???
@@Luton-Mick he would have already been set for life financially, why go and drink lager in your childhood home, going to mundane tourist conventions? He did not have to "stay" in a housing estate, he would have had to return there and choose to be a tour guide... absolute bollocks
The pics don’t match for a start plus the Italian version of Wired: hired a pathologist specializing in maxio cranial identification and an IT digital expert to analyse the photos and put the whole PID thing to bed in 2009 (40th anniversary). Concluded that all the pre Sept ‘66 photos/videos were the same guy and all the post ‘66 photos/videos were the same guy BUT pre and post were two completely different humans. Posted a load of measurements and data and wrote their own book on it. Day the article in Wired was due to be released in Europe Faul did his rooftop Letterman gig in New York. Complete coincidence of course. Plus a University Prof stated there were three different voices claimed as PM’s around that time after detailed voice analysis. And then there were all the deaths...
My heart says yes, this is Paul. Great to see him alive and well. Very different vibes than Faul, always something strange about him...The real one is so kind, funny and human. Sources say he quit the Beatles in 1966. Cheers, Paul and God Bless!
I was very young when the Beatles were first on tv ....maybe 8 . I remember when Seargent Pepper's song came out ..... thinking "What the heck is that.....and who is Billy Shears.... and who cares." I was disappointed that they weren't playing music like they played before. The way John and Paul used to elbow each other and play around. That wasn't happening. The looks on their faces weren't even the same..... not as cheerful. The more I research the more I realize we've been lied to about everything. It all makes sense now. John Halliday is the real Paul McCartney, I believe.
Thing is in the music business, once you've peaked, achieved stellar success and wanted to get out (as the original Paul spoke about his desire to retire in '66), you can lose the passion to write.
Yes. Me too. He actually looks MORE like the young Paul would look like today than the imposter we have right now. Faul done a lot of cosmetic surgery.
@Donna It's not just *_looks,_* it's also his *_presence._* The man in this video comes off like [an older version of] someone I would like as a son (no, that's not a joke). Pre '66 Paul had this same presence about him. _Post_ '66 Paul came off as soulless and anonymous... nothing you could "bond" with another human being over. Just ask yourself - which one would you warm to? I'm not even in to The Beatles, but it's just the man himself who seems extremely likeable - similar to Shinji from "Hadashi No Gen" - they both seem like someone you'd want to have a great father/son relationship with. Can't really explain it better than that.
You've got it all wrong silly people! John Halliday had an accident while on a ski trip in Switzerland back in 1988. He was replaced by Paul McCartney. Paul jumped at the chance to moonlight as caretaker. He was then able to interact with generations of fans without being swamped by paparazzi.
I was about four years old when I knew that the two guys were completely different people. Yes they looked similar but that's not the same at all. Children pick up on these things because they have eyes closest to the natural world unspoiled by the deception of man. So I trust my inner child who knew when he was four years old that these were two different McCartney's
Mark, I felt the same. I spent most of my childhood suffering asthma, watching beatles, elvis and gidget movies. When Wings hit the air I knew it wasn't the same man. My father was 21 when the beatles began. The accident which supposedly killed the original paul (video above) in 1966 was never in the news in australia. There is so much more to look at. Sage of Quay has dedicated a lot of time to breaking it down should you wish to see more. David Roberts, you are a closed minded sheep. Go stand in a field and bleat your days away.
Mark but what so you think about this guy? cuz he does look like the real Paul and I don't see how there would be 3 look alikes for one man plus his ear is attached witch Paul had an attached earlobe and the fake Paul does not
Yeah, because he, who doesn't sound anything like Paul McCartney ("Faul" sounds a lot more like "the real Paul"), would really just decide to leave behind that life and go and live a working class life conducting tours of his old home.
He didn't die, he just retired. The Beatles and their managers behind the scenes, obviously knew that some people weren't going fall for the lie that the new guy is Paul McCartney (because he looks completely different), so an alternative theory was concocted where he apparently died in a car accident. In order to create this theory, they placed some reverse messages in their recorded music. If you play some of their songs backwards, you can clearly hear messages saying "Paul is dead". However, the real Paul McCartney was always alive and well, just living a quiet life outside of the spotlight. The fact that he's in this video at the childhood home, proves that he wants some people to know who he really is, as he is getting on in age.
I was watching a video from the Beatles Magical Mystery Tour film. It was their home movies and the interviewee's were people who were in the "tour" and people who lived in the town's the bus filmed at. One of the interviews was with Mike McCartney also known in the 60s as "Mike McGear". I'm not sure if he's older or younger. But looking at his full brother (same mom and dad) While he talks, his mannerisms etc'al .. He looks more like this guy.. IMO something changed with Paul after 66. His eye color, his hair part and his shoe size is different. Paul pre 66 had a cherub face. Post 66 he has a longer narrower face. I have an original Sgt Pepper Album and I took it back out and just looking at it again.. Whether he was or not Thank you for giving me a reason to take my album out ,play it and appreciate it ..
In situations of very very high level celebrity in some cases they will have multiple look alikes that can all sing, perform and act like a specific persona. They literally have multiple people playing one celebrity all at different stages of their career spanning decades at a time. It’s weird and they did the same thing with Michael Jackson for sure. The Beatles were completely fabricated by the tavis stock institute. One of the monkees was originally a beatles before he left for the monkees. Ringo sucked so bad at drums the first three records had session musicians play the drums. The guy everyone thinks is Paul McCartneys name is actually billy shearers and he also goes by billy Shepard. He has written tell all books but they are written in fiction form with a character named billy shepherd and billy shearers but it’s basically the truth written in fiction form it’s weird. The channel sage of quay has literally researched hundreds of hours into the Beatles and realized they were a fake and contrived band that didn’t write nearly as much music as they were credited for. Please check out sage of quay to learn about the Beatles deeper. They weren’t even a touring band really. No one realizes they only played live performances from 1961-1966. They were super busy but that’s only five years of actually touring and real performing not made for tv stuff and playing on rooftops for a music video. They could barely play their instruments in the beginning. It’s very odd the biggest band in the world only played out for five years. It’s hard to believe the biggest band of all time isn’t completely coordinated and planed by the Tavis stock institute if you look into it. The whole John Lennon death was staged. It’s all occult ritual to feed off of peoples sad energy whilst to fool you and make you spend money on resurgent record sales after artists deaths. I doubt he’s dead. Hope this helps ✌️
No one realises they stopped touring in ‘66?!? This is common knowledge. Everyone starts out being ‘barely able’ to play. You improve with time, like a fine wine, really. They aren’t Ricky and the Red Streaks you know!?
@@oneeyedmonster9460 go research and educate yourself before you comment something contrarian without an evidence or proof to substantiate your claim. Please look into what I’ve laid out for you.
@TurboChrist You is crazy. I say this because my uncle was an engineer at EMI and I would get to sit in the control booth with him. The lads had no replacements whatsoever. I knew each one, they are the originals til the end.
Reading a very old paper(2016) by MWMathis, there was a link to this video. There should be no question that the title of the video is 100% correct, with the keyword being "should." There was no "death", but merely the 'retirement' of one of the twins who were used in the Tavistock project from day one. Denying the long-known facts must make the naysayers feel better about having been fooled for so many years. Thanks very much to the channel for keeping this video available!
Show this to everybody who believes in "Paul is dead" rumor. He's alive! Paul never died in a car crash and never got replaced by a look-alike. Paul is alive!
Look carefully at the ears . Watch i want to hold your hand live at ed sullivan theater on RU-vid. Also the broken front tooth has still not been fixed by john or paul. Watch this video again and check it out. You would think he would have fixed that tooth by now !
Notice how he said the tv license people contacted him. Now why would they contact him if he was not the owner of the house ??? Then he mentions he has an agent . So I wonder who is the owner of this house really ??? Is it the national trust as shown on the sign ??? If so do they let employees take their dogs inside the home while they themselves are drinking beer??? Would they let an employee live in the house ??? Very doubtful . It is natural for somebody to want to go to their old home especially when the beers are kicking in !!! Surely this happens to the best of them as we can see it happening to our hero from the 60s.
as somebody who’s been cutting hair for over 35 years I can tell you that is definitely the real Paul McCartney .the real Paul McCartney‘s hair parted on the left side just like this man’s the fake Paul McCartney‘s hair parts on the opposite side definitely a fake
ah yes because parting hair on a different side means they're totally different people. I guess i'm constantly switching between the real and fake me since i part my hair on both sides
