The Rolling Stones Live at Sydney [27-2-1973] - Full Show 

Apparently they lost a lot of them. So said bill wyman

It's incredible the quality of the Marque shows in 71. Video and sound is beautiful.

@@jonndepentu4421 72 and 73 are better

@@toniwertman4818 how could they lose them? they don't want the world to hear anyone better than Ron Flub Wood

@@toniwertman4818 Wyman, the guy who wrote Jumpin Jack Flash? He doesn't know anything... they have all their recordings... they just don't want to hurt Ron Wood's feelings..

totally... that's the song he really whips on

Who could have been better?

Nobody! Taylor’s better than Clapton. Maybe Jeff Beck was as good or better or Page. That’s about it. Taylor was one of the top three in my book. Page, Beck and Taylor! Clapton was great in Cream.

@@dynjarren7523 clapton is an over rated poser....mick t was better than any of the others you mentioned.....by miles...

@@jeffsmith2022 Both Mick T and Keith are in top form here. They don't always fit easily together, but here it is absolutely epic.

@@dynjarren7523 Jeff Beck would not have fit with The Stones like Mick Taylor... I think Taylor is smoother and faster than Clapton and Beck is more flashy and eclectic...

but,he also made Keith play more attentive,and better.

It sounds like he really belongs on this tour

@@johanvanspaandonck4481 SO VERY TRUE!!!!!!

@@robertholtham1619 many many stones fans i have found say that Taylor "overplayed" on this tour... I swear to God I kid you not!!!! people get scared when they hear Taylor with The Stones... they want their Stones to be sloppy and funny...

it's funny because MT is a guitarist the world hardly knows, but when any song of this era is uploaded, everyone knows who the best guitarist was...

I’ve gone though mine since i was younger then five

Same here. Five yo in '73. LOVE the Taylor years. So many terrific shows. And Jagger is still singing instinctively and not as a parody of himself like he started doing in '75, unfortunately. That said, the '78 tour had its moments but never would they approach the lyricism and flow of the Taylor years.

also when you listen close, Taylor is also the Rhythm Guitarist when he's not soloing... Which goes back to the Brian Jones era... Then the rhythm guitar goes into the solo while Keith's lead-riff aka rhythm charges alongside the lead solo... Which is different for The Stones... Usually when a lead guitarist is playing like, ACDC or CCR, the rhythm guitarist continues doing what they do while the solo is playing... With the Stones, the rhythm playing of Taylor comes around the bend and takes the lead while Keith is the Sherman Tank... it's basically TWO LEAD GUITARS at the same time, the solo and the riff/rhythm

It is a great live version. Stones had were playing again for voodoo lounge tour but it didn't sound good, it was so slowly and jagger voice was no angry anymore

one of the greatest .... fan of the stones from the beginning . come on ...

A Stones concert back then was an Event! Powerful and moving! Great Rock n Roll!

When they had the brilliant Mick Taylor on lead guitar they were the greatest rock and roll band on earth.

@@pauldebacker9022 it's funny because there are Stones fans who i call Taylor-Deniers who say that Taylor was in the band when they were already great, but those of us who knew that The Stones hadn't been an actual functioning stage band for three years in 1969 know that Mick Taylor is who MADE THEM great during the guitar-god era that The Stones found themselves in in 69...

@@cultfilmfreakreviews Sorry for my late reaction. I wholeheartedly agree!

that second solo is just insane...

Isn't great to right up against the stage or the bar , i was in Vegas , right up there , but those bloody lights are so hot , with jagger moveing like he still 20 years old so hard to take a photo

he really was... my god... and if you wonder why The Stones and many Stones fans (who like the band more than the music) have become Taylor-deniers it's because... well... just read these comments and ANY comment sections of ANY song during the years he played, and it's ALL ABOUT MICK TALYOR, hardly Jagger or Richards... THAT is why the band wants this era to be behind them...

Na realidade. Sim. Taylor como solo espetáculo. Más nada desse sentimento comparar com Keith. Impossível. A tonalidade da guitarra do Keith ninguém consegue. E de vez enquanto ele resolve solar. Aí pior. Nada é igual. Essa é a verdade.

ElPocho DelMundo No, he was just a prick.

Which did you prefer? led Zeppelin or the stones?

+YerPope not chuck nicky hopkins

YerPope You mean Chuck Leavel And He Joined in 81, I met Keith when I was 16. He is barely 15 minutes away from me. I've been fortunate enough through the years to go on all tours if I wish. There will never be any group that plays going on 57 years! And They set the standard that all others try to copy But end up burned out or dead! There was and still is a method to the madness. They know how hard they can push it! And They all recently except for Darryl Jones agreed that after touring since the 50th in 2012 non stop They did the ZIP CODE TOUR THEN THE ON FIRE TOUR. THEN THE OLAY TOUR. NOW THE NO FILTER THEY NEVER! FELT THIS TIGHT PLAYING LIVE. AND MICK,RONNIE,CHARLIE,KEITH SAID THE 4 MONTHS OR SO WE GET OFF. IS PLENTY BY THAT TIME WERE PULLING ARE HAIR OUT! LOL AND WHAT WOULD KIILL US NOW IS TO GO HOME AND SIT IN ARE ARM CHAIRS! LIKE THE OLD BLUES BOYS WERE A BAND NOT A GROUP THAT QUITS AS SOON AS THEY GOT ENOUGH MONEY FOR LIFE. WE LOVE WHAT WE DO! THE GRAND CHILDREN COME. WE WILL KEEP LEARNING AND PLAYING UNTIL A MAJOR PERSON DIES OR CANT DO IT BECAUSE OF HEALTH ISSUES.

wrong. horrible lavell joined them much later, when their star already started to wane. he now has a place simply cause he helps stir the ship and jagger likes him. like terrible sacha and keys substitute. sad (like creep trump would say)

YerPope Haha, thanks for nothing...

YerPope Nicky Hopkins piano

the best IMO is Brussels, but not the official one, the bootleg

Rolling stones muddy waters

I was in Paris 1970, wembley 1973 and both shows in Cologne 1976. Then Madrid 1990 I had tickets for both shows but I had enough with the first one. 1995 was my last concert. Enjoyable as I went with friends but the thrill was gone in 1976.

lucky... when you were there did everyone just go crazy about the solos, or was the Mick/Keith jumping-around-stage show more important? I wonder because... I can't see how Taylor didn't gain international fame for this kind of playing, even if he quit the band... he was with them a long time as far as quality goes

@@cultfilmfreakreviews it was the whole spectacle . Jagger and Richards of course were the focus, but as you can hear MT took some of the limelight simply from his brilliant playing. He stood there almost motionless (same as Bill Wyman). But he really created a lot of the overall excitement.

@@Kleermaker1000 As much as the 1973 shows are incredible, I'm starting to lean to 1972 US /1973 Australia as the peak. Billy Preston was great...........but Nicky Hopkins was just extraordinary.

Fucking A

I was also there. I must have been standing right beside you! I also have fond memories of seeing the band arrive in a carriage pulled by white horses! Incredible experience. What I want to know is are there any photos of that actual moment, the carriage and Mick? I cannot find anything documented. Thank you.

not for decades; when they've played it since 1989 it's simply NOT a jam anymore, it's an old song that is actually centered not on twin guitars but keyboards

Ludicrous comment. Many guitarists with Taylor’s technical or even better chops: Clapton, Page, Beck,Hendrix, etc...Only 1 Keef.

well Keith was always there lol it's Ron who's the problem;; a nice guy and everything but he simply is NOT a soloist in live settings; he flubs every note

Taylor's art challenged Keith to come up with something more imaginative than falling out of trees and posing with a cigarette in his mouth.

and people on the biggest stones fan site call this his "overplaying' tour and that he ruined The Stones no joke

Same in 2019

not even close the stones live have been awful since Taylor left

No band was charging $20 in 1973 that is like $500 today. All that dope smoking fried your brain.

@@truefunksoul8638 The Strolling Drones currently charge $8500 for front row seats in America and yes we paid a week's wage back in 1973 to see the worst live show in history.

relistening now it sounds better than other videos of this era - so a nice crisp quality recording

white horses.Sorry for the typo. went surfing at the Bra next day so hped up!

And the bass line ❤

search words: stones 1972 philadelphia special brussels affair perth 1973 and you'll find TONS

They played Rocks Off in every concert in 1972.

i have both Perth shows... they were way wilder than this show...

I as there as well. Up in the stands watching Keith full circle rhythm sweeps. Skipped school and hitched to Sydney from Inverell. So good.

@@13061954 That's a damn long way. But it was back in the day when you could hitchhike and get a lift. 👉

Bob Cabo .

a non-musician reporting on musicians!

Did the reporter have ears? hahahahahahah

Are you instructing Keef how to play his own songs?

@@truefunksoul8638 Obviously yes.

@@truefunksoul8638 Technically it's Jagger's song but anyway!

Taylor's solo on Brown Sugar is insane