This Is What A Healthy Disagreement Looks Like 

Even just swapping the first one to "so are you saying" creates a much more open dialogue

@@Infernus25 yeah, definitely.. turns statement into question.. as innocent observer from far away Croatia I'm seriously concerned about politics that left is using in US.. No one wants to hear the truth, they either categorize people (sexist, racist, homophobe) or they speak over someone's words during a debate.. they are so scared to hear what someone has to say, cases where someone fought that hard to silence free speech are linked to ex USSR, communist China and not that long communist Yugoslavia.. It's terrifying.. Good luck 🤞..

@@gordanprgy6850 while I agree the left has gone too far by just labeling anyone they don't agree with "racist, sexist, transphobic etc" they at least seem more in touch with the average person economically and also are proactive in fighting climate change. While the right care mainly for corporations and don't believe in climate chnage

Infernus 25, yeah thats exactly how I feel, I like leftist policies but some people in left are just too sensitive, I guess.

@@mojolake2943 Yea like with most things the correct form of action is somewhere in the middle. While LGBTQ rights are obviously important it goes to far when you may be forced to use someone's pronouns

juan twotree fax, so many people just want them selfs to be right. like it’s a fight.

I doubt that there is one right thing for everyone rather right thing's for individual people, this ofcorse comes with disagreement with might be followed by fear or violcance hence the problem

@@leopoldivesic4872 the duality of right it wrong (imo) don't exist. It's hardly ever Black or white. Always a shade of grey.

@@juantwotree5710 yes but people tend not to think that way I mean even you must admit that you process your thoughts in a dual fashion, it's our nature and even if the real objective world doesn't have duality we in our minds have it. Even if I'm wrong about that I still believe that people are prone to conflict with one another.

But if you really think aboht it, there isnt any true right, we may say things we say are right are right and wrong are wrong morally, however it’s something that’s al perspective

I teach literature and one of my primary goals is to teach my students how to have a conversation. Freshmen to Senior year, it takes a lot of effort.

Recalling what you’ve read and putting it down in writing one after the other ofc w/critical thinking is a good substitute.

During my last year in high school in New Zealand one of the final Literature assessments was to have a debate against another team of 4, varying topics between groups. We had to then have a debate about said subjects with an opposing and defending side. Regardless of your opinion on the topic you still had to either oppose or defend. Was very interesting and really opened my eyes on having a formal and thought out disagreement/agreement.

Critical thinking is sadly NOT what those in power seek from the masses. Critical thinking should be promoted and encouraged however.

@@stevedixon921 Sure, but you’ve also got an uneducated workforce as a consequence.

No that's decency and manners. Something heavily lacking in today's society.

@@jacobvanwy9612- Like he said . . . . a super power.

I understand the hyperbole here, although to respond otherwise I'll say that this isn't a superpower, it's just rare despite being the common expectation in a civilized society.

It’s really not. It’s called being a human being.

@@TheBerkeleyBeauty shut uppppp. Make more of an effort to talk to people.

kittypie haha that's what I thought.

Hit the nail on the head. Most arguments are a result of tribalism, and the assumption of malevolence or incompetence of your opponent. We are all a lot more similar than we think

I didn't see a disagreement. I heard a discussion around ideas. Russell and Jordan had a conversation and walked away having learned more than they came in with. It's clear Russell wanted to understand what Jordan has been talking about and ask some reasonable questions and then listen for reasonable answers. Jordan saw that and was happy to oblige in a reasonable manner back to him. Seems to me they both walked away a little wiser than they went in.

True, but the rubber meets the road once either of these actual, thinking adults casts a vote when it matters. It's just a sad fact that most voters can never be influenced by adult debate with an option to learn something and change for the better. They aren't interested in positive effect, just waving a giant foam finger for their "side".

Its because neither are moral relativist! They both believe in a transcendent Objective Truth and a higher order in wich conversation/Debate flows more eloquently and can reach some conclusions.

Straight ☝🏻

The only thing resurrecting this year is another corona wave

RB way to come in with negativity when neither the video or the comment has relevance to the pandemic. I was wondering where the “disagreement” was but he got the views so fair enough

@@11oshelbourne he was joking.. the only one bringing negativity to this now is you

I feel like it was labeled that way on purpose

Instead of seeking truth by discussing opinions, now people just choose an opiniõn and try to fight to the end with it

That's what people do, reinforcing of the fittest as they go through the whole thing/conversation

My interpretation is that this was a discussion regarding a disagreement.

But you can have a discussion while having a healthy disagreement

a discussion, where theres a disagreement they dont agree that means they disagree i know you wanted to copy, the top comment but a discussion can have disagreements and agreements in fact thats basically what a discussion is agree or disagree, sometimes but not always right or wrong

Watch joe Rogan podcast

@@stevencabrera8558 came to say this 🤣

Cathy Newman: "So you are saying, that Jordan Peterson never makes any sense"

@@user-wg9ok4cy6v May I respectfully say that that is an opinion, and that I have respect for you for saying it on his home turf

Bc it was a men on the other end. (by saying "men" i dont mean "not a women", more like "not a kid or dumb faren type women or a dumb mofo"

Omg I love your comment!

Glad i scrolled down here

Losing weight isnt always healthy but ye I getcha.

Hilariously - thx 😂

Alucard so far so good. I laughed a really hearty love which surprised one of my sleeping cats out their sleep 😇

Well your not supposed to have conversations on social media, because it's only 1 dimensional and normal conversation don't work that way.. you need eye contact, body language and tone. Social media should be used for entertainment and fun, not discussions.

99.9%

The joy of a keyboard has ment u hold Polaroid views that are in-trenched so cause people to get there backs up Edited for the old people that require full spelling The joy of a keyboard means that people hold polarised views that are in trenched so causing people to get annoyed or argumentative.

@@mantask1537 I think it's too useful of a tool for discussion to bring off of the table. Never before has it been so easy to talk to so many people from so many different places. Feels like a total waste of that opportunity to just be memeing with them all of the time. You used to have to travel a lot to be able to do that sort of thing. Kinda throwing out the baby with the bathwater if you're looking at something that connects information in previously unimaginable ways and the only fitting use you see is for it is entertainment. We are missing the cues we have adapted to, and it is changing how we communicate as we explore these scenarios. But the most incredible thing about human communication, is it is always changing. Our language and ways of communicating things adapts to us, and we adapt to it. We still have not learned to communicate on the internet. But honestly, the way people talk online in say.... 2008, compared to 2021. I see big improvements in how people conduct themselves. A ways to go. But I don't agree that we give up on having online discussion outside of fun because most of us aren't good at it. Most of us aren't good at most things! And sure, it's annoying as hell. It's really just a different way of communication. And it's about as 1-dimensional as a book, which is to say it can be as deep as the words in the conversation make it. I'm not sure what you mean by this, or what the relevance of it is. You seem to be looking at the limitations of text, but seem to be ignoring our very long history with the written letter - the internet of the distant past. Also, who's to say the bulk of internet interaction will always be text? Just food for thought. Rather than toss it out, try to make it better. And honestly, it's not like people do that much better in person.

Make that 99.9%! You are giving the 10% too much credit.

I wasn't either, but if you haven't already by now, check out his youtube channel. It's fascinating.

Just thinking the exact same thing! 👍

Exactly!

A grower and a shower 😝

He seems genuinely interested in other people's thoughts.

Similar to the Joe Rogan interviews. There is no sense or hint of agenda coming from the the interviewer. You could actually feel Russell’s interest when Jordan started talking about divergent/creative thought processes

He’s legendary with women too like this guy fucking tip toes the line of being considered a pervert and has mastered it like no other

@@Sam-sw5iu I think Russell could accidentally mischaracterize Petersons position because Russell is very strong minded and opinionated himself. I'm surprised actually that Russell managed to remain as genuinely open as he did.... And I say that as a huge Russell brand fan

I believe the lost terms we are searching for (again) are "respect" and "courtesy".

I live by respect, always have.

Mindfreak!

Just 'liked' your comment to 420.... time to go smoke a bowl.

Sorry matey I speak English - what are those two foreign words you used?

Amazing

@@ryanmoran2403 still one of the best teachers I've ever had.

Traits that are going extinct due to everyone thinking they are right instead of having a discussion.... it's funny how people think that your not able to change your mind and then view things in a different way after new information is brought to light

Why does Russell sound like he's just taken a hit from a helium balloon? 🎈

Leftists: Why doesn't one of them just freak out and start threatening violence? They'll never get a point across like this....

@@ChrisSmith-ec6qp um, the fact that you think you're not a part of the overall problem here is just...

@morgan I'm Aussie but I never wanted to vote for someone who spent their time attacking the other party and offering nothing of their own plans for change.

Maybe, but most likely not. It's a classic way to encourage the other party to see the flaws in their own argument. If you point them out there's a huge chance they will become defensive and entrench their flawed belief, allowing the talker to find the flaws themselves leaves them much more open to altering that view

When he says help me understand its deep because it takes everything in me just to hang amd understand him when he's kicking off thought. I'm not stupid but he is stupidly gifted with free thought amd English

@@cockbeard no with russell he is being sincere. hes like this all the time. and with people he REALLY opposes. in this interview, he and peterson agree on the important big things and have differing opinions on some of the details.

@@cockbeard I mean can't it be both? By being genuinely interested in understanding your opponents argument they're more likely to over-explain, partly because you're likely to ask more questions that don't result in them being on guard, but also because you come off as more approachable. So you get to satisfy your own curiosity while simultaneously leaving them less guarded and more open to making flaws, it's kind of a win-win.

Russell Brand is a genius...

way to hard to understand, im a construction worker. Electrician...lol

I agree and relate! He has changed my way of thinking as well - emphasis on HOW I think, moreso than the content of the thoughts. Being exposed to critical thinkers is really refreshing.

@@LOUDpersonalities I couldn't agree more, especially in a world that changes so fast anymore

In my family there were 3 things we didnt talk about.. money, religion (my family is religious but I'm not), and politics. When I was 30 I started speaking to my grandparents about politics and how they felt about certain things but avoided asking things that would force them to say if they were left/right or conservative/liberal. They opened up a lot, I think realizing they wont be around forever, and my mom was amazed because she never knew how they felt her entire life. I don't think people need to be that secretive, however at the same time it would make for a much healthier society.

@@magnumxlpi that's beautiful. Thank you for sharing.

@@magnumxlpi that is a great story.

Good advice Rozz !

I can't accept a view as a "disagreement" when the person holds the view that someone I care about doesn't know their own mind/body. Because admitting such would throw their whole world view into chaos.

Exactly. Name calling and degrading somebody for having a different opinion only makes them resent your opinion even more.

It's not about name calling its about understanding the dialects of peterson and the narratives he allows his audience to come to it's clear he doesn't like trans and gender rights to some extent but the arguement of free speech is actually an argument off harassment from a legal perspective that is all that law changed and his lack of understanding this of recognizing it is what lead to his speach becoming dangerous

@@tyshelton2123 Take a breath and write that once more friendo.

@@tyshelton2123 Maybe some punctuation would help your comment to actually make sense?

Only IF that person is willing to accept it.

Excellent description. Well done.

Bruhh 😭😭😭😭

“So you’re saying women can’t disagree?” Is a funny one too lmaoo

Don't forget that in their eyes fat people can be healthy

Ya killed me there son🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

This is the one 😂

Lol

One would think a big forehead would imply being smart or higher IQ.. Don't look how big your forehead is next time you look at the mirror.. White elephant.. you'll do it anyway because I said so.. Same why you stayed for the most part of this video, how I know you ask? Because you watched and listened closely enough to notice how big their foreheads are, you came here to learn what a healthy disagreement looks like.. and I'm happy you did, cause I did to. Cheers!

I have a forehead so big you could land a jumbo jet. I must be smart lol

somalians have big foreheads need I say anymore

More brain duh

If I thought that was a genuine statement I would 👍 it. But your placating because we don’t know what else to do at this point.

@El Coro Russel wasn't punching and the fact that you have to frame it that way is the problem.

@El Coro Nope, The Problem. Partisan tribalism disabling discourse isn't an issue unique to myself. It's evident to anyone with the desire to actually act in good faith to solve our problems rather than just destroy the perceived other.

@El Coro You aren't that special or as unique as you think you are. Society exists and the interactions between individuals are what define us as a species. Anyone with even a cursory history of biology or history knows this.

Russell is a comedian and knew he couldn't prove him wrong in this instance.

this is literally how politics should be. neither one of them are acting like 5 year olds not getting their way

@@Holyshift22 Yeah, imagine if politicians didn't argue to prove they were right to gain power, but instead just bounced ideas off each other trying to figure out what would benefit people and the country the most.

@@Dmm3 Yup imagine that. If only most people understood. If we don't i'm not sure if humanity's successes will continue in its current trajectory over the past few hundred years.

Ye right, they are just talking and listening, I don't see any disagreement

I was going to say that,,,,, totally agreed,,,, 2 guys talking and Listening

rocknroller167 I've seen some of her interviews and she is also well spoken with a lot to talk about.

StuckInMeta yeah that drug filled disaster of an interview on Ellen had many great points

Fight Milk fr😂😂

iS SCieNcE ReLatEd to mAtH ? ?

Im sure the conversation was great and the sex was wonderful. Your all just jealous. I'd hang with either one.

He has a common understanding of guest. I wouldn't say what you said

ToolforOffice Or how auto tuned he sounds

Even more so than Joe Rogan, now that I think about it.

@@FahimAhmed-xj9lq joe rogan is not in tune lol

He his nothing like this when talking about british politics.

david periard What is this “conversation” you speak of?

I don't get it. If this is a conversation, where are the fists? The screaming? The lies? They didn't even bring their crowbars! Who comes to a conversation unarmed?!

Metal Jacket Comment of the year

david period lol yeah like civil real life talking

Honestly yea

You're right, he comes with only questions. He never really asserts an opinion that is challengable or requires a serious defense.

Brand's wise enough to know to not start a fight that he can't win. The only way to come out good with Peterson is to engage him in a constructive conversation. If you attempt to take the aggressive, dirty and dishonest Cathy Newman approach you'll end up mangled in the twisted wreckage of your own failed narrative.

Brand is an experienced interviewer to say at least. Some years ago I didn't even like his interviews with Karl Pilkington because he tend to dominate the conversation with his own stories. Now he's a new kind of Brand

@@TheExcellentVideoChannel Peterson has stumbled numerous times when in discussion with both Sam Harris and Matt Dillahunty and has backed out of debates with certain individuals while publicly boasting about how nobody of "their type" would debate him. The man has some serious flaws in his belief structure and his own cognitive dissonance to wrestle with and accomplishes very little in his public discussions other than confuse people with nebulous vocabulary. His views on things within his own fields of study are interesting but the moment he starts talking about religion or politics he really shows his own biases. The guy legit said that Nazism was atheistic and that you can't quit drugs or smoking without having a religious experience.

@@thoughtbom You mean he's a flawed human being with some flaws in his thinking. I'm not looking for a Messiah. I take the approach that no one I will ever listen to is always going to be right but I take the parts that are important to me and scrutinise them before integrating them , or not, in to my understanding of reality. From the perspective of my own interests I've gotten a lot of very useful perspectives from Peterson, Harris , Dillahunty ... But my point was that if you do a Cathy Newman like attempt at rubbishing him then you will lose . Harris and Dillahunty are way more clued up with considerably better constructed ideas but Brand is not in that league and he knows it , so he wisely chose to not engage in battle.

Exactly! That nut job woman is despicable.

this is so perfect!

LOL

Did you make that up all by yourself, David?

So you're saying all women are accusing men of things they didnt say?

Dakotah Goodin well said 👌

zacklee

What exactly did they disagree on? Where did the disagreement happen? It's a good interview. I wouldn't call it a high level discourse, just a good interview. I didn't hear Russell present any opinions in opposition to what JP was saying, because that wasn't the point. He was trying to uncover JP's views and he did it very well. No disagreements that I heard, though.....

465marko Just after the six minute mark is where you see the differing views begin. They spent the whole first six minutes talking about transgender identities and what not and JP’s view that it’s wrong to have to call someone what they want to be called. (If you follow any of his interviews, he WILL NOT call transgender people by their new gender. If you were born a man, he will call you a man.) You see Brand start saying that he’ll call you what you want to be called, he’s just happy you’re talking to him. They disagree on how these concepts should be handled. I’m not sure if you do or not, but if you know anything about either of these men it would definitely help understand.

465marko Also, right before the 11 minute mark, Brand begins to tell his opinion on JP’s views. I recommend watching it again and just taking an extra listen to these two parts. I hope I helped clear it up.

Mischievious title.

So you’re saying... anyone who isn’t a man isn’t intelligent.

@@user-pv7cq9bp5j 🤣🤣 nice reference.

James Diesel so you’re saying since he’s referencing a man that men are better than women and women don’t say anything worth referencing?

i mean, he has hour long lectures and published books if you want to hear him talk

imo the result was still the same. Brand was still looking for a gotcha moment and it seemed Brand wasn't listening. I also think it's funny how Brand still thinks that capitalism is the cause of all evils yet i've never heard him define capitalism accurately. It's the same as declaring nuclear power as completely unsafe and polluted without actually knowing how it works. I give him credit for questioning things, but when he interviews people that knows more than he does, sometimes he still disregards what he's being told because it doesn't match his own beliefs. It's the opposite of liberalism.

If Russell got nowhere in this debate at least he was civil and he was willing to hear from the other side which is wiser than how most ppl live in their safe little echo chamber. Personally Jordan Peterson is fucking awesome!!!!

Yes your assessment is spot on, great job.. Did you notice Russell exposing Jordan as the establishment SHILL that he is in the end of the video?? I HATE Jordan Peterson, if there were a hell I would want him burning there for eternity!!

@snide 2 I had no idea is there a channel on RU-vid you'd recommend that I should watch that points out his faults. I like to hear both sides. The reason I like jordan is bc he stands for free speech and how strong his argument are. A great example is when he argued against bill c16. I'd like to hear more from your point of view. So I don't live in some echo chamber.

@@danieleasterling3763 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Go2b6t7N2VA.html Jordan is trying to appeal to young men who are a bit naive and slightly confused and who are trying to just make sense of a world full of so much mis and dis information and information in general that it's difficult to get to the truth of the matter.. He's been propped up by the Globalist elites (those at the top of the world stage or hierarchy in which we are all forced to take part in).. I've been trying to expose him in the comment section of videos for almost a year now and everyday I'm getting closer and closer to making my own RU-vid videos out of aggrivation but censorship is becoming such a problem that I'm afraid that it may not even be worth it.. It's a scary time to live in a world where there is an increasing amount of control of information ecspecially in a Country which is supposed to be all about free speech.. Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing.. Listen to the very end of this video where Russell actually somewhat exposes Jordan where he speaks about "mischief".. I would be more than happy to fill you in on whatever I can, we are literally taking part in an information war..

Did you disrespect him before?

That's called confusion.

Fully agree. Russell use to be an extreme far left activist before he became famous and now, thankfully, he still holds his views which he's completely entitled to, but he seems much more approachable nowadays lol

@@DarrenHarrison7160 Extreme far left activist? Russell? What do you believe a centrist is then?

@@koseorhun You clearly don't know about Russell's past sweetie 😘

❤

This is hilarious

Bro same

Lol same listening right now while hitting my bowl.

Lol

Lmao I’m hearing ya

No one was compared to Hitler either

Dude I love being called a communist though, because it’s true.

Russell Brand would have accused Jordan of being at least three of them names had he been not so intimidated by the ability of Jordan Peterson to make him look the buffoon that he really is.

@@masonh738 that's sad.

Mason H you’re not a communist, you’re a 16 year old. Hahahahaha I’m jk, but I think maybe you’ve got some research to do, and you need to remove confirmation bias from your psyche.

You almost had it bud

@@strawman3070 thought the same thing 😂😅

Tazmanian Devil proving and finding out is the same thing🤦‍♂️😂

that's just handling matters in 2 different ways, no need to make a formula about it bruh.

Emir Ozdemir interesting

Same with JBP! I like the way they both speak

@@LexRexLibertarian They both do well here. I do dislike the way JBP often rambles on on other occasions instead of getting more to the point.

Yes

@@woutervanr hmm

Russell is someone who I think most people would struggle not to get along with unless you were intentionally being an arsehole. He's very eloquent, respectful and relatively knowledgeable but also willing to concede to things he might be less knowledgable about.

We all are able to discuss like this - but some people chose not to.

@@trueamnisias No not really, not "all". It takes a certain level of intelligence and reasoning to be able to discuss like Russel and Jordan in this case. There's far less of those in the World than you'd be led to believe.

We used to, until everyone started giving in to th loopy left.

Once we get rid of first past the post voting, this type of discourse will flourish as opposed to the vitriol that gets flung about in the internet today (something I myself am guilty of).

Be THAT person! ❤️

Probably my fav comment

That doesn't make any sense. The only prerequisite for a disagreement is expressing two opposing views that can not co-exist. That's it. Whether or not a disagreement "appears" that way is irrelevant as to whether or not you are doing it right. However, if your goal is to have a "Civil Disagreement", they are doing it right.

@@sud6646 you sure do not know how to have a respectful disagreement, the irony is unreal 😂

@@TheRainmustFall7 Did I offend you? Oh no!

@@sud6646 i do not have time to be offended, i am only being judgmental :)

The truth is, Russell is not even in Peterson's league.

Made me laugh too

Alexander Gervase I’ll call you what you are not what you want to be called. If a black man told me to call him white man I would just call him black man. If a trans told me to call him her I would call him him. I will say what you are and not what you want because I’m in touch with reality and facts than other people’s feelings

Perfect fauna and flora for a "daddy" joke

Roberto Deoliveira oh you’re so strong.

Dustomatic Yo wtf???😂 thanks I guess

Very confused manbunboy

@@michael7v6 yeah

@@michael7v6 Immature comment.

When he began to speak more publicly concerning society, he deconstructed himself. He can be flexible and that irritates people trying to pigeonhole his views.

@@RollingThunder69 His early public image was fairly one dimensional. People liked that because it was easy. Then he shattered that image and people got scared.

I know right. It was really pleasant to hear them both talk. He was in a personal discussion with him. I love his openmindedness.

If you listen again, Brand is actually trying to trip him up, to show that on occasion Jordan can be a little contradictory in his views, and Brand achieved that. Brand’s intelligence is off the charts, however a lot like so many of this new wave of scholarly types he has seemingly made a conscious effort to extend his vocabulary into the realms where most people haven’t a clue about what he is speaking about. Jordan does the same, these guys and many others could become seriously important mainstream voices, if only they stopped trying to out vocabularise each other.

@@simondefoy7610 Jordan’s vocab is natural, brand’s is clearly an effort.

@@vicsalvo2231 so Jordan is being intentionally obtuse. We all get it

@@zapkvr He’s being naturally* obtuse

I believe it does. When I worked as a software developer back in the 80's, I was introduced to a concept called 'ego-less programming'. The point of it was to raise awareness among developers that they, as individual human beings, aren't their code. Put another way, sometimes smart people write code that compiles/runs, but it doesn't do what the technical spec's require. Rather than getting defensive -- as if writing out-of-spec code was somehow a necessary reflection of one's intelligence/professional skill -- we were encouraged to set ego aside, make another go at understanding the spec's, and revising the code as necessary. This preference for ego-less engagement proves useful across a broad spectrum of situations. I wish that learning it -- along with critical thinking and empathy -- was a mandatory element in primary education curriculum. If people had genuine empathy for one another, and were able and willing to think carefully/correctly about ideas... imagine what the dominant culture could transform into in just a decade or so. Even one step toward Utopia is progress, right?

@@RichardHarlos that's really interesting

Indeed, learning is a process turn not knowing to knowing, which the initial state will inherently being wrong.

Eeeeegggggggoooooo

I’ve always been open to criticism. Constructive or not. I just let it be and sometimes learn things. Some people cannot.

a cold beer is refreshing brussel is brainwashing all u ppl who think ur better than everyone else because u.listen.2 his ramblings thinking u understand them are as delusional as the sprout himself

I listen to him and I'm absolutely sure I'm not better or worse than you but not because of anything Brand said it's cuz I'm not a dick head and I don't make assumptions about anyone "ASSUME" makes an ASS out of U and ME

​@@AaaAAA-jv6ds You have no idea what brainwashing is. If someone talks to you and explains what they think, they are not brainwashing you. Just because some people have trouble following the threads when Russel is speaking he is not brainwashing them.

Please! Help me! Somebody say something non productive to me! I can't handle the rationality

@@eldritchhollow7692 build. Tha. Wall! *Induce CPR* STAY WITH ME BUDDY!

I agree with this on every fiber of my being!

Oh shut up! Sorry I had to!

A little toxicity in people saying that there's no disagreement. Russel disagrees in general with Jordan so he's asking him questions to see his point of view. A healthy disagreement can still be more like an interview than a debate and still be a healthy disagreement. We need to have a lot more of this type of thing in colleges again.

That's the first thing I noticed to, no one is spreading hatred. No one is being abusive. Wow

@@tiya3715 I did not notice this. I saw plenty of it before reaching this area of the comments. *shrugs*

I’m so glad I heard him say that because I’ve felt this for so long and could never properly articulate or internalize it

8:00 Found this minute extremely interesting.

Wow! I can identify with that, unless somebody cracks open something that has a different definition.

@@CallMeSlavik dude. You just did for what Jordan Peterson did for you. I have hard time doing that in general, so imagine complex stuff when asked my opinion or thoughts. It’s so super frustrating seening after everything I said I wasn’t able to articulate nowhere near what I felt or thought. So thank you. I’m cop tied that into my brain what you said. Thank you

Me! ✌🏽

Omg same 😂😂

@@HaleySmith I had to give u a like, thanks for noticing that.

Yeah I noiced that, creeped me the fuck out

same

Coldest "hehe" ever 😂😂😂

Ahh, humility. Ain't it grand!!!

HAHAHAH

Sharp observation haha

I scrolled down just too find this timestamp. Thanks homie.

I died and had to rewind.

Classic

There's the full hour and a half on russel's youtube :)

@@OCinneide Reminds me of when he spoke to Dianne Abbott on question time ;)

@C Mitchell Are you arguing that his intellect is much greater than Brands? If not, this comment is quite meaningless, as obviously nobody was trying to 'mop the floor' with anybody present. The title of said video was made for the express reason of showing how you would approach a situation with two discordant speakers, rather than having them try to 'mop the floor' with one another.

C Mitchell you shouldn’t try and mop the floor in a discussion but rationally explain your beliefs

@@OCinneide No one suggested one should.

He has changed though, hasn't he? He wrote a book on it. He was chaotic before. No he's mellow and spiritual

@@CalLadyQED total nob

If you think he hasn’t changed, you obviously didn’t know of him very well prior to this interview. He’s changed a lot. Russell would tell you he has changed a lot if you asked him. No offense

@@wq198mnr Correct. I haven't been following his life path. We've both changed. Is that better?

Kevin Goldsmith : Well said. Same here

Imagine trump talking normally😂

Behind closed doors they do. But when the public sees a them, they need to align strongly to what they represent even if that means stubbornness. They may be somewhat. Everything a president says or does is intentional for effect, they do have the budget to focus on that.

Why do that when you have an army.

What's wrong with "give oil or die" XD

@@themaharishi8160 😂😂

Rebel Raccoon n

Don Lemon is the worst... did you see how he treated Terry Crews? It was shameful.

@None None na na na na na piers Morgan is a tool

@None None Stressful or at least taxing, activates sympathetic nervous system, risks distraction from the subject

@@rorz999 hes working at the tv equivalent of a tabloid what do you expect? He exaggerates everything for entertainment.

Without disagreement there can be no conception of the right and the wrong

shut the fuck

You’re here too bubba

Well imagine wanting to watch a video labeled normal discussion

watched the whole thing, didnt see a single disagreement.

It seems times have changed for the worst in that sense

We used to pride ourselves on conversation back in the day. Like in the 1900's, read a letter written back then, to now.

@@leroyrodgers6089 There are still enormous amounts of formally written works being created, you are merely focusing on the bad. Global literacy rates have risen drastically for centuries, and it hasn't gotten lower in recent times. We used to pride ourselves on conversation back in the day, just like we do now.

Klas h You and I may, I’m not sure that it’s possible for conversation and I do mean face to face, not through an intermediary such as the internet, to possibly be as glib, nor interesting as it used to be. As social media continues to be our main source of communication, it seems that the nuances of face to face communication would naturally diminish over time, no? Maybe it hasn’t yet, but I’m curious for this next generation that grows up with the internet. I’m 29 so I had a few years where you had to call someone on the telephone prior to MSN getting popular, and I was socially awkward until university. I wonder about those who are awkward and don’t have as many opportunities to truly pontificate out in the open in free flowing language. What about working from home and how that will color the conversations coworkers have with one another? What do you think about that? You have an excellent point about literacy though, reading and writing hasn’t regressed, I was wrong about that. Although sometimes when I read unthoughtful, deplorable comments on RU-vid I do begin to wonder. Not in this thread, or on this video, but general RU-vid.

watching this even got my eyebrows sweaty

But the real question is if given opportunity would you make love to him?

He's a good chap still sold on Marxist nonsense

You should check out when he had Westboro Baptist Church members on his show, people he disagrees with almost entirely. But when his audience starts booing, he tells them to be quiet and let his guests speak their piece.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OBA6qlHW8po.html

He's one of the only thoughtful people in public life, sadly

I have to get past his voice and speaking manner, but if you focus on where he is coming from and what he is trying to say, he's quite interesting.

For the record, most people don’t even talk to be truly understood. Meaningless small talk where nothing is actually put out there to be gained is the majority of conversation

@@viirahnaerrahveem867 sooooo true,there is no meaningful dialogue,it's all gossip about someone else, never about practical solutions.

how can you reply then? dumb quote..

@@jozen5384 read a book

@@lightmess4841 I am not the dumb person here buddy. This is some wannabe woke bs. You witness a normal conversation and suddenly you come up with the most basic knowledge. Sorry, but it just shows how you seem to consume alot of bs. "read a book" my ass

U know jp got some flame when those choice of words comes in, Well spotted 👍🏿❤️

You forgot to mention . “Well, why’s dat??” 😹

Time stamp?

It's also very respectful of the other person's opinion. He's not saying "no, you're wrong. This is the way it is", he's saying "you have your view and that's fine. Here's how and why someone else might think different".

@@al.6350 1:38

What? You didn't think Jordan DESTROYS clueless liberal?

Eh, the title promises conflict (albeit politely-discussed conflict) and then the video contains no actual conflict. So at least to a very minor degree it's clickbaity (in that the title promised more than the video delivered.) I mean sure it wasn't titled "one weird trick Jordan Peterson uses to convince his followers", but it was still a little misleading.

@@majmage Eh, you know what I mean. But in case you don't I'm talking about the videos where the titles say "Jordan Peterson fucking OWNS RETARDED LIBERAL FEMINIST" and stuff like that.

Titles with "this is what (blank) looks like" is clickbait though. A non-clickbait title would be "Russell Brand & Jordan Peterson conversation" or something.

@@thomastakeshita4979 Sure, I agree the title isn't _hyperbolic_ in its clickbait-y-ness.

Go away canadian

@@caneloalvarez8474 no u (uno reverse card)

Dude we see "Eh" so much, it really is thing.

I was literally just thinking this

Canelo Alvarez ..what's your problem ? Canada is the best country to live in. Most freedom, least violence. Low pollution. healthy nature everywhere.......way less segregated than America and extremely low levels of racism and xenophobia (outside of Quebec ...lol)

For once Brand wasnt being childish and name calling.