Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair recounts his first meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and how he changed from "Western-facing" to "cold and calculating." #CNN #News
Don’t you ever get bored of saying that? Doesn’t it stunt your thinking? I was against the Iraq invasion and walked out of the British Army over the first one and I also believe the second was a historical mistake. However, this man was the longest serving Labour PM in British history and therefore may have a few insights into world politics. He had a working relationship with Putin. In this video he’s speaking about Putin. Did you even watch it?
@@wittsend541 The world would be a better place if Blair was never born. So yeah the POS deserves it all. Every word. We will never let him or others forget that he is a murderer.
What a strange world we live in: Mass murderers are not punished, are free to walk around and are even asked their opinions on TV. If that's justice, who needs it?
@@MrGranfield he is certainly a scumbag an embarrassment to the working class who is supposed to represent, war criminal fits he chose to spread the lies that the bush administration cooked up therefore is is responsible for all the atrocities of the americans and the so called allies
Lol everyone's lives on the uk and cries for the middle east...go live there...oh no...if you go there your wives and daughters will have to wear Abaya, can't drink or drive...your people are hypocrites
stop calling it a blunder. The illegal invasion of Iraq was an utterly premeditated, calculated and criminal act of mass terrorism and murder. Putin aint got nothin' on Blair.
Putin calculated the west was fragmenting (Brexit, Trump, Macron, Erdogan, Afghanistan) but it all backfired. He's contending now with the fact that both UKraine, NATO and the west generally, did not lack the inner resolution to resist aggression.
We in the "west" are lazy. We don't want to do things of we don't have to. But we, especially in central Europe, will do pretty much anything to not be under Russian management. Right now Ukraine and Poland leads the way.
Russia must be forced out of Ukraine, having gained nothing, and pay severe reparations for the atrocities they have subjected Ukrainians to. No amount will be enough.
⚡A Ukrainian lawmaker called on the United States to provide air defense systems and fighter jets to Ukraine, saying that the situation on the battlefield is "far worse" than it was at the beginning of the war. “It is hell” on the frontlines right now, Oleksandra Ustinova told reporters at a German Marshall Fund roundtable in Washington Friday. “We keep losing many more men now than it was at the beginning of the war.”
Ukraine can launch an op into Crimea. Punch right down the middle of their lines and strike deep. They could even trash that naval base and then pull back before the russians can close that hole and send reinforcements. Doing that will pull forces away from strategic areas and allow Ukraine to smack them hard in another push elsewhere.
Those surrounding him do not tell him the truth in fear of their lives. He has treated others ruthlessly, losing his ability to communicate. His own fault 😔
@@weeguy52 What....you don't think Trump would be pulling the same shit as Putin, if he wasn't stopped??? His idols are From North Korea and Russia... How stable do you think Trump is??? He does everything he can, to ruin people's lives that don't agree with him or question him.. He is an ignorant, unstable drug addict, that is a racist and a bully... He is capable of anything!!
If Putin really wants all ex-soviet states to rejoin Russia, he should have improved the economy, improved the governance, improve the society, and turned Russia into a economic super powerhouse, then other ex-states would not hesitated to rejoin the mother russia once again. He is going about it the wrong way.
You can only achieve that if you have a real democracy in place. Russia never had a FUNCTIONING democracy. It just took 10 years after the collapse of the USSR to turn Russia back into a kleptocratic dictatorship.That was Putin's choice.
You've been lied to that not what's happening! Ukraine was killing Russian speakers in their country. Also trying to get nukes etc. Its so much look up AZOV, Ukraine civil war etc!
Yes, he hasn't exactly made it attractive for former countries of the Soviet Union to even consider rejoining mother Russia. Other countries who used to be part of the Soviet Union, have moved on s lot, used to a more freer democratic way of life etc, used to democratically run governments etc. Only way he could attract them back is to move with the times, to a more democratic way if life etc. Not the kind of out dated regime he still wants to go back to. Aggh no.
His calculation didn't account for reverse psychology. Yes NATO as an organization was taking a back seat these few years. Now he's the single person responsible for waking up NATO and garnering nation support/buy-in for NATO.
@@dr.g3860 There's a picture of Obama talking to Putin, looming over him with clearly dominant body language. That was probably the exact point Putin decided he needed someone dumber and easier to manipulate in the White House.
Understandably, in peaceful times, NATO and defense issues were taking a back seat among western nations that wanted to put resources into bettering their lives instead of producing weapons, which explains the diminishing importance of a defense alliance. Putin has been working to drive a wedge in that alliance for 2 decades, recently with the help of his "asset", Trump. Unfortunately for him (and fortunately for us), he jumped the gun and jumped prematurely into his plans to increase the "lebensraum" for Russia. The whole thing has now blown up in his face Inevitably - and unfortunately - the western nations are waking up to the reality that there are aspiring Hitlers everywhere, in Turkey, Hungary and Poland, but especially the runaway one in Russia - and China needs it's own dictatorial chapter! Putin is a goner, done for, kaput, but he and his regime will take a while to collapse. Russia will remain a pariah among nations for at least a generation or so, and any hope for a benign leadership that can work on introducing proper democracy and reducing the endemic Russian corruption is slim, indeed. Getting permanently rid of dictatorial and cruel leaders for the Russian people is long overdue.
"In" The master race "Russians" are not part of another groups. Other peoples (sub-humans) fall under their domination and become part of their Empire.
Well they would never have been accepted into NATO, the US and Europeans never trusted them and assumed they would just have acted as Hungary or Turkey on steroids and made the whole thing collapse from the inside
This isn't all Putin . A lot of Russians don't like the West, hate it even They hate NATO and the EU and the people in it . They look back at the 90s with scorn and the figures poltcally seen as amoral . It's not all Putin . They don't want to be a democracy and they don't want to be a wealthy prosperous country .
I wonder if Tony remembers “The Battle For Falluja”? You’ve only got to see the pictures of the city during the war, to realise how we were bombing civilians. Children to this day nearly 20yrs later are still being born at a disproportionate rate, with birth defects. Due to the uranium shells we were using. Not chemical weapons tho! Every time a western leader mentions wars crimes by the Russian’s against Ukraine, the word Hypocrite, flows through my head. I support Ukraine in the defence of their nation and sovereignty 100%. The west needs change their narrative about war crimes, and concentrate on the Ukraine defence from another angle. I would imagine not many countries can stomach a lecture about war crimes, especially when US or UK, try bringing up the conversation. We even managed to blow up a car, full of children, during the Afghanistan evacuation, because we believed it to be a suicide bomber. That was an accident tho wasn’t it!
British army run over my uncles car with a tank back in 2004. I witnessed it with my own eyes and it traumatised me till this day. It was his wife driving with 4 kids. I doubt Blair knows nor anyone in the west cares.. we aren’t Ukraine so.. we’re only important to the west when it comes to energy and oil. Yet this man has the cheek to go on TV and meet people. I don’t know how can this man sleep at night knowing his inner self is a hypocrite and a killer
@@brbrasil2010 Was Blair driving the tank? No! So how can he be a killer? Sorry for your loss, but this is about how Putin has changed over the past two decades, not a mandate to moan about the past, if you are so pissed off, blame your own government.
The fact that Putin threatened to use nuclear weapons, and the UK was threatened with a missile that would creat a 500m wave that would wipe out every living thing, slightly puts been actually born at all whether with a birth defect or not pales into comparison with total destruction of 60 million plus lives.
@@c.james1 That's a generous reading of it. Though, what he actually said was, "More of you than of Putin," suggesting he was actually making the contrast between the two men. But even if he was just clarifying for the viewers, it's still pretty savage to tell your guest he looks old in the first 30 seconds of the interview.
i scrolled down to find this....i can't believe he did him like that...haha...great way to start the interview...makes it worse that tony and vlad are the same age..hahah...but putin was already pretty much bald there , he just got fatter and older....its tony's all grey hair and aged facial features that suck for him...aging does suck lol
Bro you know blair did the same shit putin is doing to iraq, idk if I would miss someone like him, all the guys in britain rn are incompetend but at least not war criminals lol
It's because this guy is a neo con mass murderer who is part of the elitist cabal that have been at war with the eastern world for 20 years. They have to be quiet while their employer speaks.
@@lowercentenary is Zilensky rational or a clown? Are we really having this discussion? Why tf should they care about saddam being rational or not ? And he sure as hell was rational if u go check on the Iraqi economic performance in his Era, Iraq had the fastest economy growth in the world till 2003, it was also the first exporter of oil in the world for some period, where did all of that oil go ? Why Iraq isn't even in the top 10 today when it comes to oil? How did it turn from being richer than Arab golf countries to decades of war? And smh saddam is the one to blame ? Ps:I'm not even Iraqi but I know this much, Saddam might have been a dictator but he was a patriotic guy and fought for his country till the last second, and saddam's dictatorship is 10000 times better than the western democracy that we are currently seeing in Iraq today.
@@Joeyknows924 well yeeees, if you destroyed their country you take responsibility and the west should have hosted every single Iraqi who asked for Asylum, even if they are the worst kind of humans ever and even if having Ukranians might sound better (which u want to believe) it is your responsibility, they were living in better conditions than most Europeans and they were filthy rich before the west came into the picture, but you want oil and fortunes, geopolitical dominance in the middle east but feel bothered by refugees smh, you made me remember a very famous Arab quote "they steal your bread, give you a bite and then ask you to be grateful", that's what yall are shamelessly doing.
@@Joeyknows924 1, they did not ask for "democracy", 2, democracy is a choice people come up with, anything else isn't democracy and especially not war, 3, you kill 500.000 Iraqi, destroy the country to the ground with massive bombing, kill every single official, destroy the army and the police forces, plant puppets, steal fortunes and you don't expect a civil war to happen for years ? And smh it is the fault of Iraqis ? Wtf? And about the Christian-Muslim thing, I'm amazed XD 😆 and you call Muslims extremists and terrorists? And you believe Christians are smh better while you are here thinking that Christians can kill people from other religions and destroy their countries but they should help other Christians, if this ain't terrorist thoughts I dunno what it is, and the funniest statement made by you is that Muslims should take Iraqis as refugees? How marvelous XD so you kill, destroy, steal fortunes and other countries bear the consequences because of your religious delusion XD , and finally middle easterns and North Africans are already taking Yemenis, Palestinians, Iraqis, Syrians, Sudanese, Sub-Saharan Africans, South eastern Asians ect as refugees and they don't even cry about it, but the ones who made all of those seek immigration are bothered smh. Anyways, If I believed in God, I'd say hell awaits whoever creat suffering and misery, but I believe in Physics and Newton's third law of motion states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
No good deed, he's lying here too, (by omission mostly but directly too because the US was behind the coup under Obama and Biden and his pervert son made loads of money there and continue to do so. The US is destroying itself.
I remember there were serious concerns about Putin becoming president back in the day, that he was ex KGB and was at risk of trying to take Russia back to the USSR state...then everything was apparently okay after he took power...until it wasn't
@@glenncordova4027 Well there is and Putin had one of them killed in 2006 on British soil. Only six years after he took office. He was *never* a good guy hoping to take Russia toward democracy. It was payback and get back the USSR from day one.
Imagine what a great country Russia could have been...very advanced, on friendly terms with its neighbors and the rest of the world? Tragic, how far it has declined. Russia, your people deserve better!
come on its the US who has ripped up all the treaties who have worked on stopping the gas pipelines who refused every cooperative gesture that Russia made , well they got what they wanted and maybe we will all pay
You forgot to end the sentence with "if only the Americans were not interfering in Continental Europe's affairs and doing their utmost best for Europe to turn its back at Russia".
And how much he was getting boxed-in and pressured and betrayed. Nato wouldn’t get an inch closer was the agreement already in 1989, and since then they only kept advancing and advancing, until the ‘rockets’ were pointing almost inside Putin’s nostrils already. Yes the war is terrible, but they have done exactly everything they could to trigger one, and Putin had tried to solve it by talking already many many times before
Yeah, Putin always was a slimy bstrd! I remember saying to my gf when he took over: “this is more dangerous then the CCCP”! The guy has dead eyes, like a fish. You can’t trust such a person!
. With war and dealing with agressive nations, Tony Blair was at the forefront of the modern era. Other interviews he described various US lead retalitory reactions of which he said he was as guilty as anyone and would agree to let history be his judge. The UK is without a leader at the moment because honesty, above all, is a leader's top mandate. Britain needs to realize Tony Blair was instrumental in ending the violence from the IRA. I say he would be an excellent interm leader till an election. Not only for his experience and judgement on what works on the world stage but he is respected and liked by Russia and especially Vladimir Putin. Consider this as an alternative as Lame Duck P.M. during a serious crisis of war is fundamentally flawed. Putin said the UK would be the first nation nuked should NATO create a no-fly zone or get directly involved. I not only respect Britian's Parliment more than the US's Congress but a Tony Blair would be someone I could trust not to F-up like a divided US mid-term would do and be guaranteed disasterous. This I 100% believe and so should you.
@@markwebber526 i almost chocked when i read that you trust Tony Blair! lol Surely you must know the WMD's and the 45mins and of course the sexed-up dossier claim which in reality was nothing more than a fantasy and a lie in order to drag UK to war where thousands and thousands of civilians were killed! If you trust this man, it says everything to know about you really!
Listen buddy, Iraq committed UN Confirmed Genocide with chemical weapons in the Halabja massacre, you do NOT FUCKING tell me Saddam did not have Chemical weapons?? BULLSHIT of course he had Chemical weapons!!! You have fallen for lies on the internet. The invasion of Iraq was 100% justified to stop a madman who has destroyed the lives of millions of his own people.
@@drscopeify typical American response! By the way, UN has also confirmed that no WMD's found or existed prior or during the invasion! Have a nice day!...buddy!
Tony Blair "honestly believes" what he did as PM was right... I'm guessing Putin honestly believes what he is doing in Ukraine is also right... Hands up if the world honestly believes both these guys are delusional war criminals...
Please turn your life to Jesus the rapture is about to take place any moment now bible says “no man comes to the farther but by me”we really don’t have a lot of time left so much bible prophecy has came to life it’s only a matter of time they is going to be hell on earth for 7 years if your left behind believe me you don’t want to be may God bless your soul and I hope you read this message with a open mind🙏❤️
"At that moment, in the sunset on Watership Down, there was offered to General Woundwort the opportunity to show whether he was really the leader of vision and genius which he believed himself to be or whether he was no more than a tyrant ...." Richard Adams
Putin is quite calculating and smart usually, so I'm surprised he made such a stupid move of invading Ukraine and didn't foresee Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He seems to be totally cut off from reality now. Because the Russian military is in an appalling state and is in no way capable of invading and occupying a country the size of Ukraine. And he's in absolutely no position to take on the 21st century military capability of NATO in a proxy war he now finds himself in. He can't even move 1970's tanks across the Ukraine border without them breaking down all over the place and some have parts inside from salvaged from Russian household electrical appliances. It's a major humilation for Russia, showing the world clearly that Russia no longer a great military power and has lost the fierce and respected army it once had. So Russia has resorted to sheer brutality, massive shelling, missile strikes and artillery fire on civillian towns and cities in an effort to either force Ukraine into surrendering, or just to punish Ukraine and degrade the country and prevent its membership to EU and NATO. If I were Putin, I'd be looking for a fast way out of this situation rather than prolonging the pain or dangerously escalating the situation with tactical nuclear use, which I think maybe his only option soon. Some are questioning whether Putin is rational still, and there's also rumours he is terminally ill with leukemia, which may be influencing his decision making into taking huge gambles. Historically, Putin has been motivated by money and enriching himself, but now has more money than he can spend in a lifetime and is nearing the end of his 'career' in his 70's and health failing, he may be drunk with power and looking to leave his mark and some kind of political legacy. He's always been consistent about his desire to re-create the Soviet-era borders of Russian Federation, and to push back at NATO, and has been slowly doing that for 23 years. Often despot dictators that are weakened (and let's face it Russia's economy is in an appalling state, now shrunk to the size of Italy, and a mere fraction of the size of UK's) resort to wars as a way a) detracting from their own failures by rallying patriotic support and presenting Russia as the victim/under attack b) propping up a failing economy through conquest expansion.
After 19 years since the beginning of the invasion of Iraq, has the West forgotten this war? The Iraq war is said to have resulted in 1 million deaths the difference is russia have weapons of mass destruction A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened Russia has the World's Largest Bomber As of 2022, the Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 5,977 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia has the most nuclear weapons of any country, at 6,257. Of these, 1,458 are active, meaning they are already deployed, 3,039 are available (can be deployed if needed) and 1,760 are retired (out of use and awaiting dismantlement How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world? Russia - 6,257 America 5,550 UK - 225 France - 290 China - 350 Israel - 90 Pakistan - 165 India - 156 North Korea - 40 When you tell the truth it's always gonna be controversial. sar Bomba, (Russian: “King of Bombs”) , byname of RDS-220, also called Big Ivan, Soviet thermonuclear bomb that was detonated in a test over Novaya Zemlya island in the Arctic Ocean on October 30, 1961. The largest nuclear weapon ever set off, it produced the most powerful human-made explosion ever recorded. Russia's Tsar bomba: World's most powerful nuclear weapon of mass destruction. The Tsar bomba exploded about 4 km above the ground and reportedly produced a mushroom cloud 60 km high However, the Soviet Union developed three AN602 physics packages at 101.5 megatons (Mt) and these are more powerful than the Tsar Bomba, which was downscaled to 51 Mt before being used RDS-220 Vanya. it was modified to yield 50 megatons, which was estimated to be about 3,800 times the strength of the U.S. bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II The declassified study from the scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory, published in 1947 had first shed light on the question that how many nuclear bombs it would take to destroy the world. According to the study, it would take about ten to a hundred 'super nukes' to end humanity America Takes Women's Right Back To The Dark Ages
An April 2004 Gallup Poll showed Iraqis believed the invasion was "worth it" to overthrow Saddam Hussein by a margin of more than 2 to 1. Then in 2006, sectarian violence kicked into high gear, and they mass murdered each other and blamed their liberators. You want us to pay Iraqis reparations for not knowing what was best for them better than they did. As for Afghanistan, their population *doubled* during America's 20 years in the country.
I visited St Petersburg in the pre-Putin days aboard a U.S. flagged ship delivering food aid wheat and found the people friendly, curious about the west and hopefully for their bright new future. Sad to see them succumb to an Authoritarian with all their hope lost. No sanction relief until Ukraine recovers ALL their territory.
I guess Russia also suffers from the curse of natural resources as many other countries did . What an temptation to create an autocratic state with an omnipotent leader, sourround yourself with a bunch of corrupt oligarchs who work for you and exploit the resources. Makes you and them flithy rich, powerful and above the law.
My question to Brits is why would Tony Blair even mention Boris Johnson in the context of solving the trade issue with Ireland. As far as I have seen from the US... Boris is a buffoon who was willing to sell his country out to Putin in the form of the BREXIT vote, to become PM. I am aware enough of British politics to know that Jeremy Corbin is not the answer, but surely their must be a better guy than Boris.
Rather, it takes a war criminal to accuse the innocent of war crimes. Like the mass murderer and war criminal Biden accusing Putin of being a murderer!
@@anglospherefederalist4460 Weapons of massive destruction did not exist it was a lie, they went there and they destroyed a whole country without ANY VALID justification, it was a sovereign country and they invaded it 🤷
When war criminals from Usa/ UK and nato countries will pay for killing millions people and destroying Iraq,Syria, Yugoslavia, Yemen Afghanistan just to mention some ?????? Hipocrat !!!!
Like we have a great guv now .life was a dam sight better under blair and brown .dont get ill you'll find out what your great torys have done .nhs has gone back to how it was under thatcher . Boris and that clown his foreign secretary liz truss throwing insults and sword rattling at puttin .
@@Bertrum123 They aren't sword rattling. They are supporting Ukraine. If Britain got invaded then we would also want support and firm word from other countries. I think History will view us kindly. Not like China who pretends to be "neutral" which is super strange it's a bit like me standing there being neutral watching a cage fighter beat up an old woman.. I'm neutral so I won't get try to help the victim. I'll just stand and watch and provide bandages for the cage fighters fist and talk about keeping calm.
Ye isnt it great now under this bunch we live in a utopian sociaty lol .dont get ill feller you'll have a diffrent opinion especialy when your sat round a candle waiting a year or two for a new hip .the torys have turned food banks into big buisness lol
The USA invades and the UK followed. Unfortunately no matter who the PM was at the time, we would have followed the Americans into war no matter what. Blair gets too much stick for Iraq and is only remembered because of the war.
Blair gets the stick because of all the lies he told to justify the invasion. One million people marched in London to say "not in our name". Out of a country of 75 million that's a lot, given a silent majority who were against it. The dodgy dossier and all that BS they spouted at the UN undermined the credibility of the US and UK. Personally I don't know why anyone has respect for his opinion.
Totally, contributed anyway, I truly believe that they get their instructions from the rich then hold g7 and g20 to discuss how to carry it our, just keeping us all divided!
More like Putin was ALWAYS cold and calculating, so acting westward-facing was all a ruse. As soon as Putin realized that he couldn't worm his autocracy into the United States, THATS when he started to care less about appearances.
He watched America turn itself inside out during the pandemic and noticed that under Trump it had taken its eye off the ball so to speak. Putin has always been the same his grand plan was to return Russia to the former soviet regime.
He hasn't failed yet. The party of QAnon is still out there, and seems to have decided that the problem with Trump is that he wasn't quite crazy enough.
@@karlharrison2449 Sure, it's was for some B.S. reason about wanting to "Liberate Ukraine from Nazi control", when in reality Putin just wanted to realize his dream of reviving Russia's former glory before his illness takes his life.
The point was that is a plus in a leader, duh. Being an emotional leader such as Putin angry at everyone is not the way. But hey, sounds like you have anger and delusion issues as well anyway so you'll just get mad and then ignore things you don't want to hear.
Blair and bush went to war in Irak for weapons of mass destruction as there where none,now Russia have more weapon of mass destruction but no one is capable of doing anything…. Here it shows where America and Britain only targets poor and easy country’s like Irak Lydia Syria… North Korea china Russia they been left in peace
Amanda. Blair and many other world leaders and diplomats were totally foxed by the psychopath Putin.They are very difficult to detect initially.Blair saying Putin "changed" is merely face saving for not gaining insight into this monster sooner.All politicians have a touch of Narcissism !
Yes Tony we really need to listen to what you think, you talk about miscalculation!! Say that to the parents of the soldiers that died on your watch!!!
@@bonnie7898 If it was your son, daughter, father or brother who lost his life over the greatest lie of modern times, you wouldn't be saying that. The hindsight on the matter and the absolute impunity those responsible were rewarded with makes it simply IMPOSSIBLE to oversee.
I don't know if any Western leader put a lot of trust in Putin when he first took leadership of his country. But it wasn't wrong to make efforts to give Russia a chance to move to an more open and free society after the Soviet collapse. Probably if a more democratic or progressive thinking president had managed to come to power rather than Putin, things would be much different today. But he is who he is and here we are.
The question is, why should every sovereign nation adopt the West's way of life? And most of the time forced to do that! Can't be better if every country respects others! Who is so correct in this world to give lessons?
@@cyizamwana2135 Who has the right to invade a Sovereign Nation and change the leadership? Putin is the aggressor here, about the West they don't force anything on anyone. Besides NATO is a defence mechanism not the offensive. It's Putin whose the offensive, look through his years of leadership, he invaded Georgia and cut Ossetia, he did a war in Afghanistan and Syria he flattened Aleppo. Putin just have a very bad reputation.
1:26 "surrounded by people who wont tell him the truth" . May apply to Tony himself, during the Iraq war days when he became a lapdog of Bush. All those wars he has forgotten, but remembers first meeting with Putin very well. Selective Amnesia.
Great insightfulness from one war criminal about another, so you’re basically saying that a Ukrainian life is more important than an Iragi life because they’re a western democracy? At least Russia didn’t travel to the other side of the world to invade a sovereign state and millions of iragis died either because of really bad intelligence or a Big lie about WMS, and not one western leader (and I think you know who I’m talking about) ever faced a court room over it but the same people want putin strung up. Just to be clear, I’m totally against all wars
"The West is going to take its time...rolling this back." NO, the West does NOT "roll this back." The West moves ON, and NEVER goes back to the old, enabling relationship we had with Russia. Blair is absolutely right on that.
Please turn your life to Jesus the rapture is about to take place any moment now bible says “no man comes to the farther but by me”we really don’t have a lot of time left so much bible prophecy has came to life it’s only a matter of time they is going to be hell on earth for 7 years if your left behind believe me you don’t want to be may God bless your soul and I hope you read this message with a open mind🙏❤️
I mean: this has been pretty consistent amongst everyone around Putin’s people. He really did change quite a bit. The darker side of him came about after those first years of failure. People forget putin wasn’t a killer in the KGB he was an administrator.
That’s what confuses me. Others are saying “Once KGB-always KGB”. So, has putin changed twice? Or did he just play West, where the West was ready to see putin‘s Russia in EU and NATO?
There is very little point in rationing a lunatic like Putrid, it's a waste of time just give the proud Ukraine heros all the military support they need and they will finish off this war criminal
And here we are a year later. An "off ramp" is not discussed any longer and doesn't seem like Putin would take one, even if it was large and clearly marked...
Blair is Extreme Racist because he turns a blind eye to Occupied Israelis who murdered innocent Palestinian people including Children on the Streets of Israel instead Blair Armed the Jews in the Occupied Land, Palestinians are the real heroes who are not Armed by anyone and still resist the Jews who invaded Israel by force, Where's Blind NATO
@@paulwally9007 But here is a question, who is most to blame? The party that contributed perhaps 5% to the problem (NATO and the EU), or the aggressor who is contributing 95% or more to the problem? It doesn't matter what you say, Putin started this war. Period. Saying anything else is basically trying to absolve a murderer from a crime because of insignificant details, like the victim's hair was or was not dyed at the time of the murder.
I sincerely hope Europe DID finally learn its lesson, after this astronomical mistake to become energy dependent on Russia (or on ANY totalitarian regime ftm) but only future will tell. The next step would be to dis attach from China’s dependence as the factory of the world which also has been a humongous mistake.
Only way to do that is to invest in south America and Africa. Africa has more resources but china has a strong hold in africa. South America seems like the best option but it will be expensive and won't happen over night.
I sincerely hope the USA DID learn its lesson by implementing capitalism in the ressource markets. Europe needs affordable Energy and the US will have to provide energy at a reasonable price.
Well, we Europeans have learned our lesson and we are already reconfiguring our energy model. We consider it a priority. We have windy seas in the north, enough sun in the south, green hydrogen plants that are already working, delaying the closure of nuclear power plants, resuming abandoned gas pipeline projects from North Africa, self-consumption of solar energy... Goal is zero dependency on Russia.
