Top 6 Smoking Guns of Evidence That Sealed People’s Fate at Trial 

Yeah that's crazy she said that

@@MrVaunorageare you implying she didn’t?

@@superphantom100 No. He's implying that it's crazy she said that.

@@superphantom100 You don't need to overthink it. He merely implied that it was a crazy thing to say for someone who is claiming victim.

What did it for me what the audio recording where she does this evil cackle, can't remember what she said but her voice sounded so evil psycho while she was insulting him then does the evil cackle.

And executioner.

That's why one should never, never, act as one's own defense. Always get a legal representative. Even a new lawyer is more likely to know the law better then someone who's never studied law.

Bah, in Darrel Brooks case, that wouldn't have changed anything. There wasn't a world where he wasn't getting life in jail anyway. He's one of the very rare case where it doesn't matter.

Your Honor, subject matter jurisdiction. Case closed

The smoking gun was him being a male. 6 life sentences? Any girl wouldn’t have got half that if they cried on stand

She only wanted to "hit" the solution out of him.✊

What planet are you on?!

@@xshannonBAKER it’s called sarcasm.

@@xshannonBAKER your stupidity is showing

@Tushar_Talwar_09: Yes...Amber Heard truly proved to be a warm-hearted philanthropist. :D

😂

Hey, that's not a bad idea, actually....

😂

It would be like way back when, they'd hang the bodies of enemies or criminals at the city gates, to deter invasion/further criminal activity. Then there was Vlad the Impaler, though that doing that seemed to be more due to his personal enjoyment.

@@kingayy9267 Yeah, Vlad had a deep penetration fetish.

0😮❤

I second that.

Really? Domestic violence is entertaining to you?

@@shivtim They didn't say that though, did they?

@@shivtim Comprehension skills of a first grader lmao

Essentially, yes. Though you do sometimes get a few who do it just to financially ruin someone, but that runs the risk of getting countersued for all court costs and more if you're found out.

money.

Works all the time

A combination of extreme hubris, vindictiveness, greed, and other narcissistic traits.

Many do

Plus her legal fees.

Donald Trump vs the nfl. He won a dollar for stopping the nfl from being a monopoly

@@oddballskull1941 because it was an antitrust suit, the money he won was tripled. Although because of appeals lasting a while, the NFL eventually had to pay interest, making the final amount owed come to a whopping $3.76 in damages

@@ohboydiamondsmassive W's right there

@@ohboydiamonds i know that boy went skrait to mcdonalds

Imagine covering the lawyer's fees of a millionaire actress as damages lol. No more world trips for the old fool.

for the lawyers it was probably a walk in the park, those other trips were pretty damning

She didn't write anything false or maliciously the jury rushed the verdict and they weren't even sequestered. The UK trial had a judge decide it

@@schmumlaufthe UK trial blocked a lot of evidence that was allowed in the US. The US trial was more fair in that sense for sure.

@@cynthiagonzalez3193 do you even know what the trial was about? There's no way that what amber wrote was false or somehow malicious it was all true he's a disgusting drug raddled abuser and r@pist

​@@schmumlaufthe UK is even more sexist than the US courts

Wasn't AH also having dinner with the Judge's family?

Yes we did. ❤

Johnny donated all his trial earnings from her to charity, haha

@@rhino202I KNOW!!! So proud of him. I never doubted Johnny Depp…ever.

So maybe what people say isn't always the truth all the time. Doesn't necessarily mean to call them liars, but there are always 2 sides to every story

thought this was just as bad + the tmz guy saying she emailed him the video + the trailer park owner saying she was the one yelling & almost nothing was broken lmaooo she was lying the whole time its crazy she has stans online still 😭😂

She ruined the word pledged for me forever

And the videos she recorded

I think the pledging=donating mockery of the listener's intelligence was a turning point.

So true. She hurt her case so much. And ironically I think in her mind she thought she was helping. Obvi lying about what the police said and saw( shown by body cams). Falsifying evidence and using same pics for different days and events. Her own pictures which never showed what she claimed they did. It was surreal to see. How her legal team went along w it too lol! ..I agree the donation moment was huge. People that were there say some of the jurors' jaws dropped. Bc they got to see how she stubbornly lies and spins in the moment, even w direct evidence against her. They got see how she behaves when caught in a lie; almost delusionally continuing to argue and lie. I feel it helped them view other evidence and parts of trial through that lense. Once they saw how dishonest she could be, it was a wrap imo

@@patricknez7258 Couldn't agree more. The pledge/donation moment was huge. Also the TMZ slip-up. The moment when jurors found out Heard assaulted her ex-girlfriend at the airport. The knife she gave Depp. The fact that she basically said every witness had it wrong. The fact that it was discovered she initiated an arbitration against Depp first. The audio tapes where she's maniacally laughing and insulting Depp. I mean... pretty much everything.

I found the Depphead. You clearly fell for Johnny's lies

I’ve never seen such an angry person in a court room. He made a joke out of it & when called out on making a joke out of it he freaks out

He took his instructions from the New York subway shooter. That one was so madening.

That judge bit her actual tongue to bits I'm sure. She deserved the longest vacation ever lol

There is a different man who represented himself and was allowed to question his own child who he stabbed after forcing the child to hold the gun that killed his mother in front of him. That case was horrible to watch, the man was unhinged during his self representation. I’m in the uk and we defo don’t get to see what happens in courts so watching things like that is beyond my comprehension. Crazy

Some days I couldn’t even watch the trial only highlight reels because Daryl Brooks was so difficult to watch! It was insanity!

He's garbage

Well it’s not their fault Jones was guilty. If he wasn’t such a terrible person then it would’ve been easier for them.

@@kake1604 I'm saying I think they threw him under the bus on purpose and I don't blame them

That "trial" was just a matter of seeing how much money they could make him pay. No one had to prove that the event was real.

Jones is ready a psychopath! I also think he must smoke road flares 24/7.

Although I agree with your overall point, I wish you didn't use the word "gaslighting". Another overused and misunderstood word used by people today. Anyways, AH did lie repeatedly but she never tried to "gaslight" the jury. She gave them clear and direct lies at every corner...

Amber is so sexy though she gets a pass

My father is so frustrating to deal with…he does all 3 things & more.

@@JimSty-bh1os she gaslit Johnny, which was clear in some of the evidence that was presented.

@@JimSty-bh1os no, gaslighting was an appropriate word to use. Just another one of her tactics.

I’d be GENUINELY surprised if we didn’t get a movie adaptation of that trial some time in the next 20-50 years.

of course it will be remembered, it was streamed online everyday when everyone was locked in their homes. but will people remember the Ghislaine Maxwell trial ? of course not, they didn't even show it and barely reported on it. Epstein already swept under the rug

Kathy Griffin would be a good fit as Elaine Bredhoft since they're both dumbasses who try to present as geniuses.

I'm still staggered that anyone watched it at all. It's one of the base cases that is about as important to humanity as RHBH.

Having dinner with a mega pint

Norm MacDonald would laugh at that

and calling hearsay on an eye witnesses testimony

My favorites "who is you?" And "what else do you not recall?" 😂😂😂

My favorite is when he objected to the state dropping the assault charge case against his ex because that's all he prepared to fight

“Interesting…” 😂😂😂

Fake it till you...get sentenced

Hahahaha, same here. I didn't know much about Johnny, didn't even know he was married to Amber.

@@MayaBishopStan same I honestly didn’t even know who amber was before the trial 😭 I was trying to give her benefit of the doubt bc she was the woman & I seen in the trial Johnny was violent sometimes to but after hearing what she did she was definitely the psychopath that pushed johnny over the edge sometimes. johnny seems like he as a pure soul just anger issues

Ngl you seem ratchet

Same here

@olivialindsey5577 Normally, I'd side with the victim, too, but none of Depp's other exes alleged that he'd been violent toward them. Including Vanessa Paradis, with whom he was for over ten years.

She got a new bruise kit. You wouldn’t know it, it’s from Canada 🤭

Relax dude, it's a makeup technique.

@@Denny_Boi honey; they where being 🎉sarcastic🎉

@@gwennygrausamt A bruise kit from the future even! She truly is an anomaly

So what? Kyle shouldn't have been there to begin with. He's a murderer that got away with it.

​@@LoveDimashaliaha ha 🤣🤣🤣

Rittenhouse is a hero

@@LoveDimashali that dude pointed a glock at him had it coming, anyone who brings a gun to a protest knows the risk. i say it played out fairly

He looks so smug. He came there hoping for trouble, and he got it.

Facts. The audio tapes were the smoking gun in JD vs AH. 100%. They both have issues, yes. But she admitted that she hit him and blamed it on him running away from fights. What else is needed? So glad he's rid of her.

Yes, that's what sealed her fate for me.

I couldn’t have said it better myself. I’m a father as well.

Allegedly, the reason for him even going after his family is BECAUSE he had been "protecting" them or at least their and the family's reputation, alongside with the Fraud/Theft of company/business money.... I absolutely DO NOT condone what this man did, however if you try to get into the possible psyche of the Person during this time, it is understandable why he thought this was the way to go.... He tried to be the "protector" by allegedly covering up for his son(s) crimes, while committing other crimes himself, overwhelming himself with the lies and cover-ups....

​@@ninagude0586regardless of his psyche at the time, this man should never step on another glass blade or feel the warmth of the sun, he deserves multiple life sentences with no parole.

@@GasEnjoyer Grass Blade*?? 🤔. Unsure if that's what you meant. And yes, I absolutely agree!! Very vile and heartless individual..... He just was already that even before the murders.

@@ninagude0586 agreed and yes lol I meant grass

"Grounds! Grounds!!... 😂

The hypocrisy of that man was unreal - he was trying to get Rittenhouse convicted based on lies. He and his friends tormented and threatened a young boy, stuck a gun in his face and then were happy to lie and say they were the victims until undeniable photographs were presented which made the injustice they were trying to perpetrate impossible to pursue. Then they have the gall to say they are the ones protecting America - these people who would happily pervert the legal process if it let them hurt the people they hate.

😂

"I procured a firearm while underage via an illegal straw purchase then proceeded to cross state lines into a violent situation, whereupon I proceeded to escalate it then avoid homicide charges based off the only surving victim being technically compromised from a jury perspective". Yeah real big win for that wElL rEgUlAtEd MiLiTiA

​@@APSupernary Wasn't a straw man purchase, it was a completely legal transfer under Wisconsin Statute 948.60(3)(c) as he was over the age of 16 as covered in the court case. He was driven 10 miles from his mom's house to his dad's house, there happens to be state line in between the towns. His "escalation" was putting out a fire on a property with fire extinguisher. The violent, belligerent and convicted FELON Rosenbaum, threatened RIttenhouse, stalked Rittenhouse, then chased him for half a block with the intent to attack him; when Rittenhouse felt that fleeing/retreating was no longer an option to protect himself he shot Rosenbaum. - VALID SELF DEFENCE After that he got on his phone to a friend to contact the police, he wasn't attacking or threatening anyone. A mob then turned violent and pursued him with the intent to hurt and kill him so he left the scene for his own safety and in attempt avoid using lethal force. While Rittenhouse was fleeing moving to police to report the shooting (so not attacking anybody) he was assaulted with by another CONVICTED VIOLENT FELON Anthoney Huber who he shot in while being attacked - VALID SELF DEFENCE And then what this video he only shot Gaige Grosskreutz (with 2 misdemeanor convictions one involving a firearm) once Grosskreutz pointed his ILLEGALLY concealed firearm with the intent to kill Rittnehouse - VALID SELF DEFENCE. Question should rather be why prosecutors bend to political pressure from the media and aggressively persue the only person who did not break any laws up to the point where they themselves are breaking the law and let people who actually broken the law go.

@@APSupernary let's see , it wasnt an illegal straw purchase , he didn't cross state lines with it , and by escalating it you mean cleaning off graffiti and putting out fires then running away when threatened ? And every one of the victims ( alive or not ) was compromised from anyone's perspective ( jury or not ) . Maybe try reading ?

Holy crap, ain’t that the truth.

You're supposed to talk to the jury in a trial. That part of it isn't a negative, for her. Like, she's an awful enough person, without you having to invent things that aren't true. Like, another insane and guilty person in this video, Darrell Brooks, got angry at the cops who were giving their witness evidence in the trial, because the cops were looking at the jury and directing their answers to them. Because that's what you're SUPPOSED to do and what you're literally told by the judge to do. Darrell Brooks didn't understand that, and his insanity and paranoia made him think the cops were trying to unduly influence the jury somehow. So you're literally sounding as insane as people like Darrell Brooks and Amber Heard by making a comment as daft as this. It's not a good look, bro.

@@duffman18define making others question their sanity because of your manipulation.

​@@duffman18she looked like an insincere lunatic, thank goodness you weren't in the jury.

@@duffman18i agree w u brother but chill out

Well who else was it about? Nothing she said was untrue or inaccurate but they lied about the dogdoo and you all fell for it

@quajeezo Prove it. She lied lied lied. No, no, "we" didn't. 😏

@@schmumlauf Besides, she said it wasn't about him. . . . More lies.

@@schmumlauf You do realize that part of her case, what her and her team argued, was that the article was not specifically about Depp? You know that right? You did watch the trial?

​@@schmumlaufsilence, troll

Kate Moss wasn’t going to be brought in as a witness until amber said Johnny pushed her down the stairs. Totally a lie.

The paramedics saying she wasn't injured despite her claiming that was the night he SAd her with a broken bottle.

Yeah there are people who still think jfk is alive Wtf did you expect

I think you’ll find that many of those thousands are people using various names. I think the number of supporters are way less than it looks. And most of them are being rewarded in some way.

As a DV survivor, I support all victims. Amber Heard is an abuser, with a dv arrest history. She used the courts to lie about & destroy a man’s life for attention and a leg up in the divorce. She’s trashy, low class and deserves to be where she is now.

Thousands of women AND men

I work with one

I knew he was a liar the instant I heard he was claiming all these massive life-changing injuries while she got off without a scratch. How much does she weigh? 120 lbs dripping wet? How is she going to put a guy in hospital by ramming into him without suffering any injury herself, unless she's wearing the Iron Man suit at the time?

I know! Even before I actually became interested in that trial, the first tiny article I read had my first impressing being that he was just someone out for money from someone famous. Then, it started picking up attention, so I started looking for clips of the trial, and this guy wasn't smart enough to pull it off. Every part of his claim against her vs his own testimony + his bragging about his great life on social media = just destroyed his character.

Don’t forget Amica creame not existing when she said it did and for her saying that she was so good with makeup that she erased any bruising.

and she admitted on the stand she wrote the op-ed

To be fair there were so many moments in that trial which could be described as a smoking gun. The audio recordings, the photoshopped images, the photographer who proved she staged a photo op, the lies about the donations, her endorsing the op ed's title. She took so many L's in that trial.

There were way too many against her. 😅

Craziness. A knife isn't a weapon either... chef's use them to cook.

By that "logic" nothing is a weapon because kids get everything for Christmas. 😂

Carrying an assault rifle across state lines to murder multiple people, including shooting at emergency personnel as they attended to the victims of your mass shooting (word for word of the EMS personnel who tried to save the lives of Rittenhouse's rampage), apparently isn't a crime either, according to the incredible state of Wisconsin. Good job Judge Schroeder. Btw, this judge denied the use of the term "victims" during trial, when discussing Rittenhouse's murder victims (the people Rittenhouse shot and either wounded or killed). Judge Schroeder also openly played "God Bless the USA" during trial, (which, as we all know, is a Trump campaign song). Good Lord, our country is doomed.

@@GSeward God Bless the USA was around LONG before Trump. You know there was a whole world of politics and problems pre Trump, right? You obviously know NOTHING about the actual case since you think the rifle was brought across state lines. You also don't know it is LEGAL for a minor to carry that rifle because of the length of the barrel due to hunting laws. He was being attacked and defended himself! Your emotional tirade does not supersede the law!

@@GSewardI seriously can’t tell if your trolling 🤣 if so we’ll done. And if your serious I hope you don’t have kids. Bcuz you won’t be able to protect them 🤡🫡

The product she mentioned didn't exist. It was a color correcting kit from Milani that was launched in 2017, eventhough she claimed violence in 2016.

Because those are more common than a male making public that he was the victim in an abusive relationship

@@piroko13 and it was also a very famous celebrity, on top of being an incredibly socially taboo situation.

A defamation case with defecation!

The other cases were somewhat straight forward, we knew what happened, 3 Of them had either video of the act happening or video that makes it's impossible to dispute what happened or happened in public for everyone to see (Alex Jones). The Gwyneth Paltrow one is the only where new information came out, but that case was either just a scammer trying to get money or a movie star being a terrible person. So not really that interesting JD v AH on the other hand, we got to dive deep into their personal life and find out many new things about them. We also had to pay a lot more attention to determine what was going on.

baby, that case was about DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. If you see it as just divorce then you should research this case before speaking about it.

He admitted he traveled and did lots of fun stuff after the injuries 😂 🤦

It was honestly such a cash crab

Scumbag prosecutors

I don’t get it where are you for or against Rittenhouse?

@@MitchConner2000 doesn’t matter whether you for or against Kyle. You should just be pro-truth. And the truth is that Kyle acted in self defense

@@pizrux6592 Well said 🙌

​@@pizrux6592 going to a place intending to shoot someone then shooting someone is not self defense. He told people he wanted to shoot protestors. It's why he obtained the rifle. It's why he was driven there. Nothing about any of his actions indicated that it was self defense.

I think this is just covering the last year of trials. Was Watts 2022?

@@mc-rn8ro Watts plead guilty and was sentenced in 2018

From Scotland this looks like the wild west.

My question is, were the 2 people that Rittenhouse did kill, before this or after this?

@@davidworobec1673 They were before. Gage was the last one to be shot. The first guy started chasing him, trying to get his gun, and after he was shot, the crowd went nuts and all started chasing him, some thinking he was just a guy shooting people and not realizing it was self defense. One guy tried to punch him, which knocked him down, and another guy comes up and tries to kick him. The guy who tried to kick him was shot at once, but was not hit. The 2nd guy to be shot hit him with a skateboard while he was on the ground and then tried to take his rifle and was shot and was killed. Then our boy Gage comes up and points his gun at him and started advancing which is when he was shot in the arm. In my opinion, the first guy who was shot, the guy who first started chasing Kyle is to blame for all of this. The others honestly probably thought they were doing good by chasing a guy who had just opened fire when in reality it was just self defense, not some crazy guy with a gun.

Still doesn't erase the fact that Rittenhouse and his twin piggy faced mother aren't two raging piles of dog excrement.

@@android12921- You’re defending a convicted ped, wife beater and armed robber/bugler?

the fact that Kyle has absolutely no medical training means it would be literally impossible and legally wrong to help anybody. A child spree killer lied about his motive and you fell for it. Oh do you not like that one because it destroys you narrative that he was there to help? He literally could not help, and did the exact opposite. Weird how the totally legit lawyers didnt bring this up.

@@mikeespinoza5733 YOU WROTE the fact that Kyle has absolutely no medical training means it would be literally impossible and legally wrong to help anybody. REPLY Did you watch the trial? Kyle was certified in first aid. He offered first aid. YOU WROTE A child spree killer lied about his motive and you fell for it. REPLY Spree Kller? Describe the interactions of Rosenbaum and Rittenhouse right up to the shooting in a way that sounds like a spree killer. All the actions. Just facts, no speculating. YOU WROTE Oh do you not like that one because it destroys you narrative that he was there to help? REPLY That's not my "narrative". I don't pretend to read minds. There is no evidence that he had bad intentions. YOU WROTE He literally could not help and did the exact opposite. Weird how the totally legit lawyers didn't bring this up. REPLY Did you watch the trial? Binger tried and failed to make those exact points.

@@mikeespinoza5733hey buddy, unless you know things for a fact, keep your opinions to your self and stfu.

@@mikeespinoza5733 even if he went there to kill people (highly doubtful) he would still be justified in self defense because people were literally in the process of attacking him within arm's reach when he shot them, after he fled and was cornered. Not being his 'victim' was literally as easy as not assaulting him. 'totally legit lawyers' know that someone 'illegally' offering medical aid doesn't negate their right to self defense.

@@sub-harmonik Exactly.

Gage F'd around and found out in many ways. Went on the stand and didn't even make up some vague responses, just straight up said "yeah nah, he should have shot me"

@@Joe_P I'd have to rewatch it due to it being so long, but I remember him trying to avoid admitting the fact he pointed the gun first, and wasn't even supposed to have a gun (handgun) in the first place.

Legit I was shook! I actually went into the Rittenhouse trial thinking this kid was crazy and guilty even though I barely saw any info about it. I was very easily swayed well before the ‘smoking gun’ testimony of Gaige

@@jessice293 Agreed! I went in with the opposite opinion but thought he should get charged for having a weapon as a minor in public. Still shocked he got out of it tbh.

@@jessice293 Both went there for trouble

Lol

I agree!! Love it!

There is absolutely spin on this channel. It’s owned and operated by Dan abrams for god sake. I’m not saying it’s bad, but it exists.

I mean, there's no spin when they just stream live trial footage. There's _definitely_ spin on other things, and a *lot* of it in this video. It's actually quite a shame, because a lot of what they omit is more compelling than what they share.

Huh? This IS my fav channel! “DarRel brooks built a fort with all those records boxes … he is a MESS and one of my favorite trials ! Best entertainment ever ( Dan … meh ) not so much

That's what the far left propaganda machine tried to push.

It pretty much was. Lol had he not been there in the first place it wouldn't have happened

@@nghtguy13if the rioters weren’t there either, giant moot point you made 👍

@@nghtguy13 sir you clearly didn’t pay attention to the truth of the case and everything that happened if you’re still saying that. Completely nonsensical argument

@IWontBuy-RP your whataboutisms are showing.

well he is probably new poster boy for when someone says that that is trial case its refering to.

What?

His lawyer was terrible!

@@mrceresa1 he kept refusing to to be addressed as himself - it was weird

He said he was a ‘sovereign citizen’ look it up, it’s kind of crazy

No but the important thing is whether or not he was angry.

As someone who thinks he shouldn’t have been there with a gun strapped across his chest, I agree and appreciate this perspective. I don’t own guns and know that takes either serious luck or really good reactions during times of stress

@@StarfayeArt people were there to cause problems why would anyone go there to help unarmed?

Either of those "guys" are interchangeable. Grosskreutz didn't fire at all, instead only trying to disarm Rittenhouse.

@christopherh.p.4680 Be fair. I can't speak for Rittenhouse's fearful state of mind either, but all of that happened just after he killed someone armed with a plastic bag. Also, he fell over.

​@@MuninnMyrkviGrosskreutz put his hands up, KR lowered his rifle, the Grosskreutz drew his pistol. Definitely not "interchangeable".

Yeah all the while epsteins girl’s trial was getting no coverage

Some are but some cant. I am an atheist and identify as liberal but it sickened me to see many of my fellow atheists, who claim to be about reason and evidence, double down claiming that Rittenhouse fake cried and he got away with murder, etc. Never let it be said that freethinkers exist......they dont

as someone who was against kyle rittenhouse until this video just now, it goes to show that if you’re not in the courtroom and hearing the facts of the case, stfu

Lets normalize 17 year olds bringing out their ar-15's to protests! Mann im glad I do not live in a third world country like america

Mlm😅.😅.😅m😅😅mnemonic😅 m.😅m may only only one or 😅 o oi 😅oi

​@rplute n

Fkn ah wasn’t even allowed to have a gun but nobody ever charged him for that 😂

@@imanoldurango8213 hate to be the "Akchually" guy but did you know gage (or however you spell it IDGAF about that POS) was (and still is) a felon and shouldn't have even had a gun in the first place by federal law? yeah, not such a swell guy after all huh? (also the first two, one was a kid diddler and the other was a two time attempted murderer. typically people you shouldn't put on a pedestal but y'know, muh "cRoSsEd StAtE LiNeS"

I didn’t really follow the trial. I didn’t realize how close Rittenhouse came to biting it himself.

@@georgemartin5980 indeed! The young boy was cornered by that 1st attacker between some cars, the attacker was recently released from prison. A violent offender attacking a teen. I can't imagine to be in his shoes. I am glad Rittenhouse came out alive.

As bad as driving high sounds, most stoners do it. It’s not that dangerous if you look into it.

they did that on purpose

He should have gotten a new trial upon appeal due to his lawyer's incompetence

​@@tammycrisel8692Absolutely right and spot on!!!!

tbf it should have gotten the prosecutor disbarred and jailed

@@LukeSawardMusic I was shocked that it didn't result in a juror hitting the deck and complaining directly to the judge

Exactly. That whole court case was a complete sham.

Don't talk rot 😅

Agreed. You see where the bias of this host swings. Regardless of what someone thinks of Jones the more you look into it the more it sets a bad precedence.

Alex Jones refused to comply with discovery and lost the case before it could even go to trial. That's 100% his fault. He decided not to take part of the trial and paid the price

Lol what? This isnt the "legal process" these are just highlight clips.

She did in Europe. Pretty sure he lost some kind of similar case with her there before this one.

@@derek488 Actually She Didn't! There was a case in the UK Against the Sun Newspaper.. Amber 💩 was their witness! 😅 Meaning She could say whatever without having to show proof of her Stories Authenticity! 😒

@@derek488 No he lost a case against the sun for defamation where AH was a witness and that UK trial was full of irregularities and odd behavior from AH legal team and also the judge in charge

@@derek488 And also in the UK trial, since it was not a legal battle between AH and JD directly a lot of evidence from Johnny's side was dismissed

@@derek488 He lost a case against The Sun. Proving a news company defamed you is almost impossible due to laws protecting the press. But the same news company thinks Obama and Harry styles are having an affair, so their journalism isn't exactly credible.

Might have been bc u were just plain annoying in other wayd

Amd then everyone clapped

The part of the statement that the jury didn't agree with on Waldman's part was where he said they purposely called the police a second time and roughed the place up. The police had said they showed up twice for a different reason than a second call. That's how it makes sense

@@hunterkelley5159 Correct. It had to do with there being a second call. I can’t recall for certain, but I believe the second 911 call was left out of evidence, so I don’t believe the jury even knew there was a second call. Was kind of a BS finding, but these are ordinary people who don’t have legal training and did the best they could.

The count against Depp was pretty much semantics, because Waldman laid out a specific timeline and gave specific details of what he believed happened, so its much easier to pick apart a very detailed statement and say 'Okay, well we didn't see or hear a second 911 call, so he got that wrong' and that could easily equate to it being said 'maliciously' if to them he obviously knew there wasn't a second call. There was actually a second call, and funnily enough *Elaine* brings it up either in her opening or her closing, where she says 'And there was two calls, but we'll show you that they weren't at the same time' I think she specifies that they were like 8 minutes apart or something because she goes on to say that the short amount of time means that it wasn't Amber's friends calling once, the officers getting there and finding no damage, and then the friends calling again to try and stage the scene but rather it was the friends calling twice to try and get cops there faster.

Courts did not allow the evidence of the actual second 911 call to get in. It was clearly Raquel Penington speaking. If that had been given to the jury, no way they would have sided with Amber on that one.

The lawyer I watched go over the case said they likely found that the defaming part was that they roughed the place up before calling 911 a second time. If the jury didn't believe Amber set up the scene they could take the statement as defamatory