Understanding China's Regionally Administered Totalitarianism 

everything is so relevant. it's soothing

no sane person would want the mix of corruption/idiocracy of Western democrazy

cs is pro pagan da. Useful idiots at yr service

切😂😂

The phrase "党领导一却" seems to be a typo or miswritten. The characters individually translate to "party", "leadership", "one", and a character that doesn't make sense in this context ("却", which can mean "but", "yet", "indeed"). It's possible there's a missing or incorrect character that changes the meaning significantly. If you intended to reference a common phrase or slogan related to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or another specific context, could you double-check the phrase? It might be a slogan or part of a larger sentence that didn't get fully captured or was misspelled.@@anwiycti1585

…says who

​@@yaoxiao7983 Certainly not the CCP propagandists. Anyone who can use Google, has enough logical thinking and has some experience living in China can easily draw their own conclusions and will not muddy the waters here with such obviously invalid questions as “says who”

In the US, nobody leaves the uniparty becuase they get rich in the party. I would guess the same for china.

What you said was a phenomenon happened before XI's time. Therefore many ccp members who worked in private companies or foreign firms had exited the party. Now, even though CCP members who worked in those two sectors had to enroll their memberships in the local residence administrator, nobody dares to exit the party.

Complete agree as an Indian in the UK, the west lives in a bubble where inside they think they are peaceful and democratic while outside they invade and destroy other nations. Western propaganda is a real problem

如果你把时间放回毛主席的时代，你就不会觉得极端，因为当时世界上所有的国家都在走极端，文革只是被西方媒体用来丑化中国而不断渲染放大了。那时二战刚结束，所有的国家都没有安全感，核威胁的恐怖和焦虑，中国被全面封锁，没有工业，大部分人都挣扎在贫困中，如果你研究过同一时期的经济，中国是做的最好的几个国家之一。教育、妇女解放，公共医疗，基础重工业，军事，这些根基都是在文革期间建设起来的。

Absolutely BS! Taiwan, Uyghurs, 9 dash line, china is in 15 border disputes right now lol your a joke wumao, go back to china!

Clearly you spent too much time in the UK to understand China today, I did live over 16 years in the UK and the next 18 years in China, so when I say China today is nothing like China in the 00s, it holds weight, whenever China tighten its political control and the economy suffers, it is exactly what is happening today in 2024.

@@imperialseal8155 哇，那你在中国学到了什么？中国政府加强控制不好？

1234

Listen, the totalitarian system may reach the developed level in a short time due to the highest centralised system, and the government controlled everything of the society. In this case, government could allocate any resources immediately and do not need to care about the personal interest conflict between individuals and the state. I admit this system has some advantages in initial development period of the economy. However, it also has a problem. When you finish all infrastructure construction and reach the level of the middle compensation country level, this system cannot be sustained. When people have enough money and the economy has already shaped a circle system, the continuous development of the economy must derive from its own energy instead of relying on the mandatory allocating of resources by the government. This is because in this period, the developed economy brings the consciousness of personal property, rights and civil society and its conflict with the mode that the government control anything. So, if the state hopes to develop continuously, the institution must be changed. Indian system is different from us. Your system is based on a democratic institution. In this case, you cannot imitate the development mode for China, Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore these authoritarian or former authoritarian countries. You need to construct a system to resolve the interest conflict between each region and the state. Also, the interest conflict within each reagion. Normally, the incentive system is the cure for resolving the interest conflict in the democratic system. In organization studies, we have a theory called "Tournament theory". You may construct an effective incentive system and surveillance system according to the tournament theory. Maybe this is the cure for you to resolve your bottleneck for your development issues.

@@gabner1362 According to Chas Freeman, China has 1/3 arable land and 1/4 water but 4 times the population of America, do you really think China should adopt the same type of western political system as the USA? If China were to adopt the US system, it will be a country like the Philippines or at best India. The Chinese realize there are drawbacks in their political system but also understand that the Western system if applied will lead to utter chaos, civil wars and the balkanization of China. That might be something the West wants but not the Chinese. The Chinese political system is capable to come up with able leaders and the Chinese sure don't want end up having to choose between a senile old man and a con man as their leader so THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your advice.

​@@WongPeter-tx7qq Can you understand English? I checked my comment again. I never mentioned western countries and their system. According to your comment and user ID, I absolutely can conclude you must be a crazy "Wumao". If anybody points the problem of Chinese economy, they are all from the evil America and equal to support Western development mode? Thanks to the extreme ethnic mood like yours in China, more and more crazy people started to attack the Japanese and Americans randomly. Because you guys are worshipping the evil authority from Soviet Union Bastard. I know such the fuxking crazy Wumao like you are very fasinated "Cultural revolution" and struggle with god, land and people. This is the essence why China become more ane more worse in recent years.

Would 30 million be better? Is it 20, or maybe just 5? What kind of government lets FIVE MILLION people starve to death? 😮😮😢

@@canadiangemstones7636 British colonization of India for 60 years resulted in the starvation of 160 million Indians; Due to the short selling and suppression of global grain prices by the four major food suppliers ABCD, 45 million people in Africa suffered from famine due to locust plagues in 2020; During the 20-year period in Afghanistan, the United States caused nearly 40 million people to suffer from famine, disease, and war; In 2023, the United Nations Human Rights Office issued a statement stating that "I" country systematically starved "P" country nationals to death through famine and restrictions on humanitarian aid; At present, "P" country is facing an extreme shortage of water resources, with many children suffering from kidney disease due to drinking unclean water, while the government of "I" country is still controlling the supply channels and not allowing aid to enter. I also want to ask you a question. During the three years when China faced famine, which country imposed an embargo on China and did not allow it to purchase food from other countries in the world, resulting in the starvation of Chinese people. Now, the self-sufficiency rate of food for 14 people in China is 85%, Japan is 35%, South Korea is 20%, and every year, 2 million children under the age of 5 die in India, half of whom are due to hunger and malnutrition.