Waiting For The Water To Turn Into Wine... (Waiting A Long Time Already) | Is It IMBA Or Do I Suck? 

It’s an enemy lol

It's a Changeling.

Too much talent in this channel

He's becoming jaded like winter lol

Ikr? Ouch...

IMBA complainant deserved at least that much and maybe more when hanging on by fingernails with low double digit troop counts, wasting time.

Brutal

A comparative analysis of the cost of the lost prism with the cost of the lost plane leads the controversy even further when factoring the economical and social costs of each aircraft, as well as those of their passenger. Notably, archons are known to have an extremely limited lifetime, and being extremely haughty and insufferable in the meantime, making their premature death a potentially positive outcome, according to some proponents.

Then I (and others, I'm pretty confident) wish you all the best with your exams! This is just a game of course, and Kevin is expected to make a show of any given complaint, either for the sweet or the bitter. Now a little roast by me: in which academy do they write in English like that you've used into the form?

@@mynickisrick1478 "City name left out" Business School - I did not look over what I had written down - it was just thoughts going straight to the form. It might not be as well-written as it would be in an academic paper of course.

@@Lucas-ns4yu I cannot but appreciate your manners. I was joking anyway!

Sick. I'm guessing the zealot run bys woulda changed this game like crazy

@@jeremyklein953 ya maybe, spending 4k minerals on carriers, would have probably helped too hehe.

He's like this for 100 IODIS episodes...

nightmareTomek isn't wrong, the format of these IODIS seems to be 20% constructive criticism, 80% derision and abuse.

Found Hamster's alt account

Real world teleportation is very similar to what harstem said. The theory i heard that's the most plausible is you are dematerialized, then the genetic make up and all the information that makes you, you, is reassembled at the other location. The video i watched on it then took a huge dive into the make up of a soul and if you are really more than just the sum of your parts.

@@BrEAcHxROWDY lol, that is the Star Trek transporter. I don't think I'd call that realistic. Also it's not actually a transportation device. It's a murder machine on one end. And the other end makes a copy of you. Which is a godlike power that is all but impossible. To reconstitute a human being including their memories. Ridiculous. A Dyson Sphere would be easier.

​@@Jordan-Ramses What does a Dyson Sphere have to do with anything? And Star Trek isn't the only ones using such a theory for teleportation. Stargates seems to work in a very similar fashion. They dematerializes things that crosses the event horizon of an artificial wormhole, the Stargate stores the information and sends it to another Stargate vast distances away via subspace and/or the wormhole to another Stargate which then rematerializes it on the other side. That's how I understand it anyway, in a nutshell.

@@Jordan-Ramses But yeah that it's "not actually a transportation device." But a "murder machine on one end. And the other end makes a copy of you." is what we're saying how "teleportation" could be achieved. You're not actually transporting any material over distances, but the end result would be teleportation if you would step into a machine that records exactly every single atom in its exact relative position to eachother and send that information to another similar device that then kind of "3D prints" every single atom. Of course if you don't disappear from the first location it would just be a copy machine, but if the recording would require you to step through a Stargate like in the Television series then you'd disappear from the original location before appearing on the recieving end of that wormhole that the Stargate is connected to. Sorry for messy explanation, but I'm kind of like Spotlight (from the IODIS) when it comes to writing I think.

@@ingainloggningsnamn yeah, but that is silly. There are a bunch of miracle technologies there. It's not just a bunch of atoms. There are chemical bonds. They are molecules. Those molecules are attached to a bunch of other molecules. You can't 3d print a person. It isn't a dollhouse. There are just so many problems. It's living tissue. It isn't bolted together. Forming chemical bonds creates heat. You can't cook a person at 1000 degrees.

This is one of life's greatest mysteries.

Also IIIODIS, when you take the two I and put one on top of the other to form a T, it becomes an anagram for IDIOTS.

A good comment! But a minor note: It is slightly misleading to say that information is transmitted instantly in a quantum teleportation scenario. Information is exchanged (classically!) ahead of time in the course of preparing entanglement between distant quantum memories, at which point "teleportation" just amounts to an entanglement swapping operation. In other words, classical information about prepared distant correlations is shared ahead of time, and then we can rearrange the correlations between particles so that the location to which a quantum state corresponds changes. Saying that there is "instananeous" information exchange neglects the operations an observer needs to perform to prepare a Bell-like state to begin with. The preparation step is still limited by the speed of light. So the complete quantum information allowing the probes to be "copied" (I agree this is reasonable terminology) can in principle be instantly transferred *if* e.g. the different nexii share a sufficiently large pre-prepared entangled state before the recall is used.

@@anothercreatureofthesea1412 Thanks! And thanks for your valuable insight, I probably should have mentioned the observation delay too :) Didn't want my comment to be too long, but the prepared entangled quantum states are also needed of course :) Happy Holidays!!!

Ye, and he fails. He just insults them because they don't play like pros.

@@nightmareTomek He insults them because they complain about imbalance while playing like this

If you can't beat DTs and lurkers when you can see them then you don't deserve to win.

@@Jordan-Ramses ????

1k resource of units loses against 3k resources of units?!?!?!? No way....

@@Jordan-Ramses DTs I agree, but Lurkers will fight extremely well against many different compositions while DTs will die against practically everything.

@@alalala132whyisthishandletaken wrong. 20 marines can beat 30 ovies. 20 marines can beat a bunch of slow lings. Resources vs resources doesn’t matter. Or zerg would win literally every single game. Bad examples. How about lingbane vs marauder marine. The ling bane costs more almost 100% of the time

By utterly destroying you long before you could make lurkers most likely!

@@nathanstretch I mean, yes. But that wouldn't be a very fair test of the claim.

yeah but terran has too many counters to lurkers

No one uses motherships tho lol

@@Kilesfactor Thats not true, i use it all the time... but i am silver

It's not exactly a great comparison. DTs when detected are so slow and squishy they're basically instantly dead. Lurkers when detected are still siege tanks capable of obliterating an army if you're not careful.

@@ishae3198 i.e, zerg has the best cloaked units in the game :D You know, the AMBUSH SWARM race would have the best ambushing tactics out of the three races? I'mma hope that Zerg has a good (not great) splash damaging type for using a hydralisk den, hydra, and lurker den AND upgrades. And unlike Siege Tanks, where you can just build 3 of those bad boys, siege them and laugh as someone headbutts into you, Zerg need twice more Lurkers to do the same thing. And it's in a smaller radius. One is in a line while the other is near instantaneous circle splash radius.

@@Kilesfactor I don't know what you're on about. 3 siege tanks aren't going to do anything by themselves. And, unlike lurkers, if you build 10 tanks and nothing else, you're going to lose. We've seem plenty of examples on this series and high level games of bio balls and protoss balls catching lurkers unburrowed with no support and detection and the lurkers still are able to burrow and shred the opposing army. Imagine catching a bunch of ghosts or disruptors or tanks by themselves and they still beat your army. You pretty much have to use disruptors or Ghost Snipe against lurkers because they will pay for themselves against almost any army in a head on fight.

it’s toss master LMAO

@@IvanKolyada I bet his off race is better than your main.

@@dylansevitt I would say yes, but seeing how he floats a fuckload of resources, I’m becoming doubtful

Yeah, I'm 3k3 and get fucked by lurker, every single time. And Zergs at my level Loveee to go lurker, cause they and I all know its an insta loss. So the other 2 races I play whatever build I have in mind, but for zerg I either 2 base all in or do Harstem's 7 gate 2 immortal zealot attack

Yeah, I'm a sliver II Zerg and every time I build lurkers, I win. I just walk pass their empty natural and kill 12 workers and their main building.

Nah lol i just hit diamond and i have to air toss every game especially against toss itself. Whoever does carriers first tends to win. Pvp for me is either about winning with 2 immortals early or getting more carriers and fighting in my batteries. Sometimes i win from 2 adepts just eating his probes.

I as well struggle against lurkers Because: siege up tanks; siege up libs (one at a time); stim and move infantry away; snipe with ghosts; scan Zerg: almost always a-clicks and burrows lurkers - that’s it; usage of casters is optional Just too much action for me(

@@IvanKolyada You act like you HAVE to use all of those strats at the same time. Sometimes just one of those works. Sometimes a-moving a group of five banshees that has a mommy raven on them is all you need lol

Speaking from experience?

But money isn’t countable You don’t say 5 money But you do say 5 minerals

Long time ago there was a complaint from a Zerg who played nydus+SH. He got imba (for himself) + suck stamps.

i cant find it :(

Native English-speaker here: I can confirm that English is confusing.

I've not heard Harstem say this, but several starcraft casters use the word "casted" for the past tense of cast. This bugs me.

Also, it seems harstem is straight up wrong lol. Yes, there is a mineral count in sc2, but minerals are not discrete or countable things irl, so saying "many" makes it sound like you are talking about types of minerals or something. I guess it's like if you collected water as a resource, and harstem says "it should be 'too many' water" based on fact that the game would attach discrete number to amount of water.

@@nicholasrebstock3203 This isn't irl though. You can literally count the minerals in game.

@@victornunes9845 So you should say "I have too many vespene gas" instead of "I have too much vespene gas"? The real life context matters

But it would be how many dollars do you have. So kinda both still?

That elimination meant that their bodies were destroyed but their info preserved to create the consciences of the new bodies. In the end, it was senseless because they were pummeled out of existance lol

@@valkorion46 nah tanks actually do damage to themselves a bunch of zealot run bys will clear tanks which is pretty cost effective. Lurkers don't do splash damage to themselves

How is it cloning though? Cloning doesn't work like that ?

Y'know...from testing...Immortals basically hard-counter lurkers if they don't stack up and get splashed...:P

@@corumsorensen7822 Yeah... but immortals get rekt by hydras :(

@@marcelb7122 ....Immortals do like 20 damage and have infinitely more health than hydras. You also have Disruptors, zealots, and storm

@@corumsorensen7822 so you would disagree with Mr harstem and say that you should Fight lurker Hydra with ground?

@@marcelb7122 AN air switch certainly isn't a bad idea! But lurkers are not the end of the world to deal with. Seriously.

But siege tank can attack while not in siege mode. Lurkers are completely useless if they are not in the ground

@@rivaxis In term of %, how much time you have since Seige Tank being used while Unseiged? And what keep the Lurker from burrowing into the ground? even if they got caught by the opponent army, they can still burrow and deal mass damage with enough Lurker count.

@@tigera6 maybe when changing position? when retreating for example? Also you dont just run into lurkers with mass bio clumped units, just like you dont run into 10 sieged tanks. my point was that unburrowed lurker is more defenceless than a baby and thats why it makes sense that he can burrow fast. And why does it even matter? Terran can scan it and toss can fly observers around. Just detect it. Lurkers can be easily killed with ghosts, mech army, storms, immortals and ofcourse any air that can shoot down. Also fast units can just dodge the spikes unlike siege tank.

@@rivaxis The same thing can be said about countering tanks as well, literally 25-30 Lings can kill 10 tanks easily. Its just much easier to control the Lurker than Tanks especially in mass number. All the counter you said to Lurker, the Zerg player can just unburrow them and run away from it and there is nothing that can chase them down other than Skytoss because their good movement speed off-creep as well. And you acting like its easy to micro the Bio fighting Lurker without clumping them up or dodging the spike attack. Unless its Maru or Clem, I have not seen any other Terran being able to do those thing consistently enough.

@@tigera6 if you are not good enough in micro against specific unit just try different unit conposition. Dont be the idiot terran who just mass marine/marauder/medivac every game. Thats as stupid as massing lings against hellions. And so what that he run away? Just attack the base and force fight

@Michael Lochlann by definition no. You wouldn't tell someone to go kys becUse they are so useless because that's clearly going too far. And I think you have to watch out because you can really hurt people if you say the wrong things

@@warwickthekingmaker7281 If I thought so little of other people that you seem to do that I would want to pat people on the head as they volunteer to be roasted in a format thats literally exemplified for years then I would probably kill myself out of fear that my sense of superiority would cause me to go off the rails and do something worse, yes

Many times. There's even an IODIS dedicated to how imba zealot runbys are Terrans complain about zealots all the time

Completely useless against air and cant move while attacking. It realy is just a zerg siege tank. We can also complain about DTs, high dps, invis (all time), and actualy move around when attacking. Every race have some strength. "No other unit has that" is just shitty argument. Terrans have stimpacks or mules, protoss have storm or ability to quickly warp in units potentionaly everywhere on the map. There is nothing imba about anything here. If every race had everything the game would be much less tactical and less fun.

He plays like a low Diamond, not low Master.... 4000/2000 in the bank and complains about balance... Maybe he bought the account and is dropping down rapidly? O_o