That's exactly the problem. Men don't have collective responsibility for a man's actions but,unfortunately,suffer collective consequences due to a man's(or men's) actions. e.g. When Chad dumpster dives to the 4-6 girls on the looks scale,those girls become unattainable for the average guy
Waffles, you had me at "simps will ruin dating." 😄 For my entire life, I've observed hordes of sex-desperate men, devoid of any real self-respect, empty their wallets on attractive women, turning them into anti-social parasites that the rest of us have to deal with. The only difference between today and when I was growing up is that, at long last, guys like you are both questioning and debunking popular dating BS. Well done, sir.
These simps can’t understand that attraction is not negotiable. If she’s not attracted to you no matter how much you spend she’s not going to change. That’s why I believe in coffee dates as the first date. If there’s no attraction it’s minimal financial loss, if you two hit it off and there’s a spark there you can always extend the date to dinner and other fun activities.
@@brianwaller7383 I concur -- coffee dates and all. I think a lot of men are cowed by the abundance of superficial women who say they want a "generous" man, and then tell themselves that playing daddy provider is what _they_ want too -- a belief that insulates them from the truth that they're mostly just being used.
@@BertRussell4711 Lol not intended to be a loaded question at all, you mentioned "how things were when I was growing up" and I was picking off from there. It is because someone like wheat waffles isn't too far off from my age range, and yet there seems to be a gigantic difference in overall experience. I personally feel like I fall in the "middle" where when I was in college the transition towards online was happening and I got to experience pre social media briefly. Things definitely seemed a LOT different and then I started seeing a downward spiral post 2012.
There's a reason Dan Bilzerian had plenty of girlfriends (multiple girlfiends, polyamory, polygamy, call it what you wish), and 30% of dudes didn't even have sex till 30 (statistics)..... And yes, men putting women on pedestal (s-word) is also taking it's part in dating inflation.
I've always treated myself as I treat others: With suspicion. People are liars, cheaters, manipulative, fickle, self-contradicting, stupid fools until they prove themselves otherwise.
5 years? It already happened. I've had girls ask me for vacations, clothes, food, drinks and pout when I say no. This is on top of all the things I had already been doing and buying for their benefit. Then the girl justifies the behavior saying that other men offer and they just want me to do it. Don't pay for affection, if you do it's not real.
Every relation is a transaction, if you don't realize it, you are the one being screwed. The only hope you can have for a genuine love is during teenage infatuation period. Past the age of 20 all relations - each and every one of them - are transactional. We are not always paying with money, of course, but no woman past 20 is with a guy for no reason.
@@gabriellang7998 right and if your partner doesn't appreciate your contributions and is pointing out what others are offering to them, it means they are a parasite.
@@satyakammisra it's not like I stuck around homie. There's no issue with spending money on a significant other when they are actually bringing value to your life but when a girl is asking you to spend your money on her, she's obviously selfish and doesn't deserve it. I can't imagine ever thinking that my partner owes me anything other than respect. Anything you receive in a relationship is a gift and should not be treated as an entitlement. That goes for both genders.
Simp is not limited to the young generations unfortunately, old low-middle class men who has dead bedroom are included as well. They have no other way of socialising with pretty women out of OF. OF is anonymous and easy to hide.
It makes sense even if that man has a pension or some type of disposable income. He knows he probably won't get some woman in her early 20's because he's a 60 year old slob, so he throws money at them online
I would argue that the younger generation will be the most anti-simp among them all. Look at the popularity people like Andrew Tate had among really young kids. I think social media like tiktok will blackpill many kids way earlier than usual.
I was completely unnoticed by girls and by 25 I decided to take the easy route and simp. Well the result is 10 years lost in 2 completely toxic relationships. For the past 5 years I focused on my grind and never been so happy and fulfilled with my life. I am 40 now and really needed that information 15 years ago. To younger guys - save your lives and do not simp!!!
I even went to SEA (shown on Wheat's flow chart) to geo-max. It's a sausage feast there now, with men proud to buy land they can't title, support an extended family and much worse just to get any attention. Most are dumped even after doing all this. Their thirst is just too extreme. Some SEA governments have recently made dating with foreigners illegal or very costly. Even the Philippines recently made alimony mandatory if a foreigner supports a lady.
It's crazy how many men think simping and being friends with women is the best way for sex. I fall into the rp category of things, I'll watch content like F&F for example. I unfortunately don't think men are going to stop simping. It's only going to get worse. I'm 25 and my generation pretty much grew up on having a simp mindset.
Screw the rest of our generation, we will reap all the benefits they are leaving on the table. Worry about yourself king, doing the hard work will pay off when we switch to a polygamous dating market
I would argue that the new generation will be the most anti-simp among them all. Look at the popularity people like Andrew Tate had among really young kids. I think social media like tiktok will blackpill many kids way earlier than usual.
God damn I wish videos like this existed when I was 16 - 20, that was before like you said the world went hardcore into pushing simping onto all these younger guys, and it's even worse now that BPD, sociopathic and female narcissists have simultaneously gone mainstream. At this point I don't know if it's accidental or by design
@Nick It is by design. If you can make the protected gender to have more domination over the man you will bring the spiritual frequency of most men on the planet down. This disables them from fighting injustice, revolutionary epics against the psychopaths in power. So making w'men entitled keeps men focus on only doing what will attract a mate instead of doing things for the betterment of humanity as a whole. And No1 will be to overthrow the institution by these psychopaths. Empowering the w'men keeps men only focused on one thing, which is to prove themselves to the opposite gender and ignore all other things in life. Makes humanity more easier to control when you distablize the men.
I'm 38 and I constantly think of how much better my life could have been if I had discovered the Blackpill back in my teens/early 20's. It's mostly too late for me now, the agepill has come to collect.
Dude tick tock is owned by China it's prevalent in America and does not allow masculine men this is karma for the opium dens that we created back to destroy the Chinese empire. this time they're destroying the men.... the West has fallen
@@Krelian4400 same! i simped and spent tons of money in my 20's on women who weren't attracted to me. this made me really bitter. the content on youtube is now helping a lot of guys. unless you're a chad, going MGTOW as early as you possibly can will save you mentally and financially.
Facts man whenever I catch coworkers or friends simping I call it out and tell them why. They usually stop it after that and the ones that don't find out the hard one.
@@CybrZone exactly. Even if there were no simps on Earth today, women would still get on tinder and only bang the top tier. Sure simps inflate their ego etc, but it doesn’t change the bottom line.
@@CybrZone Yeah, but the idea of options does influence choice. If you were given hot supermodels to have sex with from the day you had your puberty, you wouldn't even begin to consider the other opinions available to you.
I refuse to be a simp. I don’t care how much I like a woman , I refuse to be a simp. I’m a normie. I don’t pay for drinks at the night club for any women UNLESS she came with me and to spend the night with me . I do however pay for a date if we go out to eat . I don’t complement a women UNLESS she says something about me first, or I could try to give a complement and if she does not follow back with another complement for me then I won’t say anything anymore.
@@dedefabinho1527 that’s the way for a normie or slightly above normie . You don’t have to do it but you will never get laid . There is more sense of dignity to get laid after going out on a date and buying some dinner than going for a prostitute .
Just be kind, give flowers, a box of chocolates... that kind of crap is from our grandparents in the 40s and 50s. Truth is, it's always been about looks. ALWAYS. Only now is it being acknowledged on a massive scale.
if you are chad you can be blue-pilled, gift flowers, buy chocolates and she will just tell you how lucky she is to be with such a gentleman. If you are chad you can absorb any pill and be happy in dating life.
Yes and no. Sexual selection (vs. selecting for survival qualities) is amplified when women think they don't need men for survival anymore. Thus they won't pick qualities that would help them in that sense. It's same with other animals. External attractive features like the peacock's tail is being selected to the extreme because other females of the species also like that.
You can have $$$ be successful, dress well, have a nice apartment, go on a date & see a band playing after. If you're even as high as a 7/10, she could be fantasising over the 9/10 broke as fuck singer. She'll then go to the bathroom, check her phone & there will be another 10+ matches on there, & a couple of them will be as good looking as you, maybe better looking. She'll be thinking 'maybe I can do better than the current guy I'm dating'. That's the reality!!!
tbf everyone thinks they can do better. i know relationships where the girl is like a 4-5 and she is genuinely happy as she knows the guy is better looking while they guy is like a 5-6 and hes constantly thinking if he can do better. the only reason why the guy is dating her is cuz the girl simps for him lol
Sort of, competition will always exist when dating that’s the reality. Likewise you also have the ability to go to the bathroom and Ponder about your other matches (Admittedly Ive done this) but you have to remember you’re on a date to find someone too. Black pill exists no doubt but if she’s on a date with you, you’ve passed the exam question; somewhere down the line she thinks you’re attractive (or wants free drinks/dinner/experience - in which case it’s a nice filter to move on) the next thing is being your authentic self - don’t be a fan or else you’ll be treated like one. Lead take control, build chemistry, touch, tease NEVER let her know your next move or your feelings early on, NEVER with words tell her you want to see her again or like her initially, and make it known you’re desirable in the market. Folks too often go into dates with high expectations and create romantic stories after a good date (that’s where most normies screw themselves) leave that to the opposing person. If a date has gone well (you’ll know) leave her to ponder about you for a few days, those 48 hours separates you from even the chads she’s speaking to. Just my 2 cents, wish everyone in this community the best; we’ll all make it!
I wish the internet was around when I was a kid. I was definitely a simp in my teen years. It wasn't until about the fifth woman said to me "I wish I could find a boyfriend just like you... (but not you)" that I finally got it through my head. Realizing the truth is a game changer. I just wish it didn't take me so long. My college days would have been very different.
Guys tend to simp when they’re young because of their hormones by mid to late 20’s the desire for females lessens and stabilizes by then it’s much easier to have a detached point of view of relationships
It took me longer to realize that I was a simp. It was not until my early 30's that I realized that I was being one and god knows I wish I've realized this sooner. The funny part is that during my teens I wasn't but became one on my 20's for some reason. Well better late than never I guess
Every person that went through drastic physical changes will tell how much life get easyer when you're attractive, especially dating life. From a sub5 to a high tier normie during my teenage years, I understood that beauty was the most important thing. And I didn't have internet back in the days so I wasn't even aware of the concept of blue pills, red pills and black pills
Idk my dude...i would say that the majority of women only cares about just looks during high school. In their 20's they need to start planning and select more carefully the guys they get with bcz they are now in the "real world" and not in the micro cosmos of high school sub society. So they search for men with resources but that still are chads as possible but it's not an obligatory requirement and at least in their late 20's they start to think in settle down and have kids. If they couldn't achieve this in this decade (20's) then in their 30's they go plan B and they search for the betas, mr nice guys who they despised in high school and in their 20's. Even if those dudes are not well settled down in life, they will try stay with one, bcz better with a man that dont have such high resources than being alone.
Same for me (mostly), except, I thought money would have fixed that. I've learned the hard way money does not. It only makes the woman need you and not desire you.
@@5.5.Below.5 i said this bcz during school i just saw high schooler guys that were considered the "chads" of that time dating all the female highschoolers and even mid schoolers, all of them drooling over those guys. Then i saw the 20's girls dating not so much good looking dudes but still a vast majority dating chads. In the 30's i'm seeing now those women that i knew from my social circle getting a dude that can be average and a lot of them bald and getting pregnant. Yeah...i would say that the majority of women can always get some dude if they put minimal effort into it if it's their will do to so if they are seeing that the deadline to get kids is getting closer.
@@5.5.Below.5 it's fucked up...i would say that you can expect, if you're not brad pitt, that some girls will feel attracted to you through what you own as resources, they csn come to like you in a more genuine way, if you give enough time to them sink that idea on themselves, but maybe that type of girl will be the average girls too and not exactly the hottest ones that may no settle for less than their higher expectations, at least not so soon.
5:45 not gonna lie. Those Disney cartoons really worked on me. I remember spending my food money on a girl she never really returned the interest. I wish I had the red pill then
Wheat Waffles is way too real for most people. Those other cringe channels just give out false hope but what guys need is this kind of reality check. Thanks WW
Agree. And the other thing is all those other redpill channel their dating advice methodology is already outdated. Their dating advice may work in 10 years ago but definitely not going to work anymore in 2022 cause they didn’t realize that the dating culture has changed a lot nowadays.
@葉家瑋 Because money and status only matter once the girl she is attracted to you by your LOOKS at first. And you need to understand that nowadays women can make their own money too or even way more easier than men. Look way more matter than money nowadays in 2022. Women will choose having fun with broke chad rather than rich normie/sub5
Massive repercussions. Give women no need for men and unlimited options, they will therefore never choose (and also seek only commitment from men beyond their attraction level). Population will decline faster than we can handle.
yup. feminism gave women the ability to discard men. they eventually become upset when they are single and 40.
2 года назад
Yes... I wonder if an intellectual decline of the population isn't exactly what the end goal is. Because the dumber the people are, the easier they are to control. I believe that the future has the potential to be interesting.
@@julianp.7697 Yes and the Male death rate is 10x higher than female. Trust me these bitches are either going to snap and stop looking for celebrities, or they're going to keep being blackpilled feminists and end up dying
Back in 2013 I heard from this Phd guy(forgot his name) doing a powerpoint that the dating market would get much worse, but I thought it was a lil overexagerated due to myself doing well. A decade later and am shocked what he said is really becoming a part of reality......
1:47 - While I personally am of the mindset that "I don't have a chance" (because I don't), I've never made the illogical leap to "I should start simping!".
@@knottheory79220 I would rather be alone the rest of my life than be with someone I let walk all over me and disrespect me. I still have a shred of pride and self respect
@@josequintero7250 Absolutely agree. It's sad that this is the state of affairs we're in, but it's better to endure it with stoicism and grace than resort to self harm.
If you want to see what women are primarily attracted to, go to a dance floor and see which men pick up. It's a mix of things. But good-looking, tall, dominant and assertive men who dont take themselves too seriously absolutely slaughter.
in my country male strip-tease shows in nightclubs are far way popular than female strip-tease. If man looks does not matter, why do desperate ladies crowd the dancing muscular guy and put money in his panties?
76% of men willing to go into credit card debt to woo a love interest is the most horrifying info in this video. It's a good example of why most people do not have enough money anymore. When I was twenties, I used to be insanely confused how so many people in the Millennial generation were able to afford such expensive dates and going to major events, but uh...it turned out much of my generation lived off of debt to live the lifestyle they wanted, but could not maintain. I went into debt when I attended a university, so I understand that's just what a lot of young adults have to do if they want a university education, but it's batshit insane much of what American CULTure has normalized. Fortunately, I never went more than four digits in debt, but I also was unable to get my BFA degree due to health issues.
I have a friend like that. I used to think he was good with money, because he always had enough to treat me to lunch if I was short on cash. Admittedly, I'm talking fast food. Always seemed like he must really have his finances together. He made less money than me, but I figured he just managed his expenses better. I later found out he has something like $9k worth of credit card debt. He wasn't good with money, he was just financing everything with debt.
I saw this too when hanging out with church/friend groups 4-11+ years younger (Millenials) than me. They were ALWAYS eating out, & at new trendy (expensive) hot spots. A group of 10+ of us went out & just ordered tapas & apps. The bill split, came out to $70 each. They leased $80K+ cars, Porches, CLK's, lived in $3500+/mo apartments or condos. Every discussion was about the newest food trend, leased car, where they lived, vacations/trips. Now many of them are doing the married with kids life, further acruing debt to please their wives, or had to move back home with family.
I would rather die alone than freely give away my time, attention and money for a woman who does not love me back, and the statistics imply that average man like us most likely won’t find such a woman.
When you're totally starved for female attention, anything,.... a smile, a thank you, a laugh, a touch on the arm... is like gold. You know down deep there's no chance to have her, but you're hurting so badly it's all you can do. It's an easy trap to fall into. You have to train your mind to not go there. Watching Wheat's videos and realizing they match your past observations and experiences is a good first step.
@Eugene A lol, I am in the same boat bro. Previously, I only consider girl like 7 and above! If I get a date with a 5.5 girl these days, I will consider that a grand success.
You have to be broke, bald and filthy to be completely starve of *any* female attention. WW rated my face 4/10, but I have a good income & a nice car. Guess what I have women simping for me, too, 3/10 and below in looks and financially broke women they are. Not all women are delusional and are only aiming the 8/10 Chads, some low SMV women are willing to date normies. If you ask me would I accept them for dating up in *all* areas of their SMV? My answer is a definite *NO*
The OnlyFans simp phenomenon drew the prices for escorts quite high these years, especially after the pandemic. A lot of them realized they can make a lot of money by just sexting and sending nudes than by actually providing in-person intimate encounters. I gave up on "normal" dating, cos girls either break up with me after I don't meet their expectations, or they just want to make me their beta-slave in their house. Sometimes I just think of all of it and be like, F it, let it all burn in nuclear fire.
True. In my country a lot of women want $600 or more for an hour to have dinner with them. Are they crazy? i have to work over 40 hours for that but i have to really work for that and not just to go eating with my boss. Of course they also want to have paid for the food then and preferably an extra donation.
Inn my country (Austria-Germany-Swz), paid sex is legal and not very expensive. I doesnt make dating market better, but, at least, simps are not so desperate :)
I have a friend who simped for egirls multiple times, and I tried to warn him multiple times, but he didn't listen. The amount of attention girls get online is insane. He has no chance. It seems like he's finally getting it. I've been trying to blackpill him
You do have to hand it to egirls though. They type of content they put out is just as insane. They perfect their craft to create a look and ambience that is out of this world. So much so that typical women you find out in the real world are boring by comparison.
I am neither a Chad nor a Simp and I think God that I’m 43 years old and in a stable relationship. When I was in the dating game virtually none of this Hell scape dating world existed. I met my wife organically before dating apps even existed . You could not pay me $1 million to be young again if it meant i had to be in today’s dating world
@@returnedtomonkey8886 Even then, there's still a lot of women nowadays only useful for s3x and nothing else Not saying all of them of course, but it must be frustrating
To be clear, being really sweet is not simping, simping is when you make the girl your God, and give her gifts, financial assistance, and extreme praise that are SIMPly (lol puns) not appropriate at your level of relationship with her
That's just the gaslighting done in the MSM articles. Being a decent human being has nothing to do with simping. But a relationship has to go 2 ways, or it's parasitical. That's the point.
Being sweet only because you find her attractive and acting neutral to other girls iS simping. You are changing your own behavior and renouncing a bit of dignity for a "what if" with this particular girl you like. That's pathetic and IT IS simping. Also , women don't like "sweet" guys bud, or "sensitive", they will think you are an actual bitch. So bluepilled. Women like masculine men that do stand up for themselves regardless if they will date them or not, they want to find difficulty in getting to know a guy. Also, they notice if you are "sweet" to a girl you like but normal to the rest, which is desperation, shows you have no game or choices. Women like to chase too, don't give them that and you will bore them.
Never simp. I left the USA for mexico . My dating situation is better and I have a gf now. Being romantic and complementing women and occasionally buying gifts is normal here. It is still possible to simp here however
Never understood why it's more socially acceptable for a women to have unrealistic standards than for men to have low ones. Don't try to argue with a cope answer either🤣( edit: I said no cope answers😭 all it is in these replies is spiteful women and femmine men jumping through hoops and no accountability)
Well evolutionarily speaking the primal man would choose as many potential for offspring as possible where the female would have to be the selective one in which male is most capeable of provision and protection. I dont believe this is how we should live, but it is an explination of this trend that to me reveals human nature
@@Cbawls you are right objectively speaking women should be the ones to be more selective because they will carry the baby and after a breakup they have worse consequences than men have..Unfortunately simps made them more selective by inflating their ego
Yes, they are willing to change! My father is a simp and its disgusting. I watched him give his Xwife 2 million dollars and will end up in the poor house. It makes me sick. My mother is trying to have him declared mentally incompetent to get the last of it!
I enjoyed your chat with Stardusk. As an older BP guy, seeing younger guys unafraid to tread ground is reassuring. Most BP guys have an overlapping train of thought even if they have different motivations, but ultimately I think one defining thing is the same amongst them all, they won't shy away from the truth, however unpleasant. I'm happy a guy as young as you will stare back in to the abyss and not break eye contact.
I have a female friend (sub5 girl) who found out that Simps are willing to pay for her used underwear. She's now trying to make a living of it and already made some money with it. It's hilarious how far we have gotten... And this is just one personal story. Why would a woman even want to prositute herself if she can make more money on the internet with Instagram, Onlyfans and so on just because of Simps nowadays not even talking about the future...
There was a lady few months ago sold farts in a jar. Yes she’d fart in the jar and sell them. The simping has gotten so out of hand, there’s no hope for recovery. Just blown the whole damn thing up, it’s over
future simps will be broken, there's no place to wealth like boomers generation, and remember man is getting kicked from jobs and and universities and replaced by woman. laws and economy eventually will sweep simp behavior, simply by inviability
I heard someone say."the most abundant commodity on the planet is thirsty men" on one hand I can't blame women for wanting to capitalize on it. On the other hand most simps will never understand they are causing their own loneliness
the problem is more complicated, it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
honestly, it’s really sad a lot of us have to resort to selling explicit stuff online in the first place just so we can maintain a comfortable lifestyle
What a joke! Do really men give dosh to women in exchange of nothing? It makes no sense. They could pay this same amount to sexual professionals, and at least, for a while, they would have the real experience of having kinda a girlfriend. Giving dosh for nothing.... it blows my mind. Who on earth could be that moron? Back to the gym, I'm getting anger. Don't symp folks, respect yourself more
By the way, there was a film that went pretty unnoticed, called "her", whose leading role was by the actor Joakin Phoenix. It was descrived a dystopua kinda similar to the one we're experience now.
We are in desperate, desperate need of an Anti-Simp movement. Spread the message far and wide and don't be afraid to tell your friends to just stop it already. There will always be simps but I sense a pushback brewing. Just like there has been some serious pushback to all the woke nonsense.
corporations and the media will not allow it. I'll tell you why: it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
I just found something like "zyzz movement" .idk much about it but its promotes masculinity and overall chadness. Its quite nice since it managed to make me move more and work on myself. I even started thinking on bodybuilding.
In 5 years? I'm getting rejected by girls who I would have rejected 5 years ago. And in that time, objectively speaking I have only become more attractive. If you're sub-Chad your only option is fatties now, and even then it's not a guaranteed lay.
EXACTLY!!!! Hella girls I would of curved than, whenever I try to text them now they reject me but when I see what type of guys they like or their standards: they want a top 1% football player 6foot+ Chad. It's honestly insanity. Whenever we speak on it where called incels, it's honestly a huge problem that women have unrealistic standards.
We should open bully and mock simps even harder than before. Its one thing on the internet but for shit to change we gotta bring upublic shame into this. Have a friend realtive or coworker that is a simp? Call tem on that shit in front of people and roast them. Shame is a huge motivator
You're starting to understand why becoming a "glooming mgtow", is just about your only option. My ex girlfriend left me because I refused to simp. It's either simp or go your own way.
This is one reason why you should keep 2-3 girlfriends like I do instead of one . Dogs 🐶 bark, babies cry 😭 & women leave ….. it’s just what they do !🤷🏾♂️
Great video Wheat, once again! Just walk away from the game, boys. No need to torture yourself. You've been given freedom and good health. Why ruin both with a modern 'relationship?' Of course I would like to compete and have a wife, but as it stands right now the juice isn't worth the squeeze.
Exactly. We should actually be thanking the simps. It makes it easier to be invisible to women, if your a sub 5. Don't have to worry about false accusations, drama, impossible expectations, etc.
Simping will only increase as access to intimacy is completely not there for at least 90% of men. Also, mainstream movies encourage simping, if not directly. The perfect example of it is the movie matrix resurrection. And I see the undertone of simping in many movies. We live in a time where most men have now become redundant or expendable as in a society with so much excesses doesn’t need the physical and mental prowess of men but to nurture women at the expense of men.
I would argue that the new generation will be the most anti-simp among them all. Look at the popularity people like Andrew Tate had among really young kids. I think social media like tiktok will blackpill many kids way earlier than usual.
So true. That's one of the biggest reasons why more and more men become simps. I was in that situation a 2-3 year's ago. But, what do you think, what is the solution to all of that? 🤔 What is the best solution for young men?
The problem is that they are still seeking female validation. I am a mgtow, I went my own way years ago, I'm not trying to get dates. I keep all my money, don't need or care what women think or want and I am free to tell the truth. The situation can't be fixed until the system collapses, which may not even be that far away.
Agree.They teach men to be desparate for women.Like life is meaningless without having girlfriend so keep playing these pickup games endlessly till you die
the internet changed the scene forever, I don't think there's a solution. There will always be hordes of thirsty men giving women attention. :( Before the internet women had to settle for what was available in their local area, now they can text some thirsty guy across the world lol.
What I learned, Enjoy life like a bluepiller, Work hard like a redpiller, and Understand reality like a blackpiller. Taking the best of all worlds. A relationship is effort at the outmost level, it should be indulged in like the idealistic ways of the bluepillers, but its something you understand you should work for. Cultivating, Looks, physique, and emotional connection is key. I don’t see you as a blackpiller teaching how to have a fulfilling relationship with someone. Looks maybe the barrier for entry these days, but personality and who you are as a person is the requirement for retention. Finally in addition with physique and the proper mentality to achieve for better quality.
There’s still tons of pick up artists still fooling men that all they must do is talk to women in the street all day, even when the guys clearly well below average in looks but send them to their deaths anyways.
It's not life or death. It's just a numbers game. Law of Averages. The cold approaching is for when you want to get laid, it's less effective for finding a relationship. Use the appropriate tools for the appropriate work.
@@AnuevoX It's not really a numbers game when the answer is fairly obvious. Cold approach only works if you're attractive because your impression has to be strong initially and to have a strong impression you need strong attraction.
@@justmonika2345 looks obviously matter, you can see that when someone approach a girl if is not a chad they get more into the defensive while imagine if would be Henry Cavill approaching a girl if she wouldn' start drooling, eyes sparking and not move a cm back. xD Same stuff with approaching women, they brag about how they are cat called every day and approached by men while "i was just minding their my own bussiness" but they would get the "ugh" reaction bcz they aren't chads doing so. If they were chads they wouldn't brag about, of course that is, if they approached in a respectful way though, if not those women wouldn't like it. And this is so true when i go to the supermarkets, looks matter. Men try always to go to the cashier that have the youngest and hottest women and women try to go to the male cashiers that are younger and skin/fit.
Fresh & Fit podcast has actually woke me up about the Redpill despite me being Redpill anyway, but let me just say something: It absolutely baffles me to the absolutely core that Simps waste their time on onlyfans. Why in hell would they do this? The women on Onlyfans WILL NOT GIVE YOU ANYTHING IN RETURN. THEY DON'T FRICKIN CARE. AVOID ONLYFANS AT ALL COSTS.
I’m a photographer that has worked with some OF models (only boudoir photos) and half the time guys aren’t even messaging the model. It’s usually a boyfriend or some dude who’s managing the OF. This whole dynamic has made me resent the new influencer photography industry. It’s all geared toward “women empowerment” but all I see is pretty privileged girls showing ass like it’s some great achievement.
@@Hodlmybeer2020 Great comment. Yup I have a 40+ year old female friend who photos really well. She doesn't do OF but other sites and even has friends manage many of the conversations. Simps have no idea they may be messaging back and forth with an unattractive woman or even man - just because a hot milf makes videos and sends pics. Good Lord Guys....Stop!
During the pandemic, in Thailand, the bargirls had no customers to fleece. So they all got onto OF. Bars were doing it and these extremely desperate men were paying to watch these girls gyrate in front of the camera, waving and other stupid garbage (I watched several times in person as I was there). These SIMPs would buy the girls drinks - alcoholic, but the drinks the girls had were not Whisky, tequilas, etc. I saw the water and Coke mixes. The SIMPS even 'rang the bell' - each bar has a bell and if you ring it, everyone inside the bar gets a free drink. Lady drinks (bargirls) cost more as each girl gets a commission on top of what owner gets. Loads of OF customers were throwing down insane amounts of money. Guys from Middle East the most generous. Girls lapped it up. Many branching out and doing their own OFs. It never stopped post COVID and has changed the women in Thailand forever for the worst. All so some desperate SIMP man can mas******e alone in his room watching a phone or computer screen.
7:00 I think there was even less freedom of choice than you let on here. For most of human history up until about the last century or so, you (whether male OR female) didn't really get a choice in who you married. Your parents would decide, and they would arrange marriages based on family connections and pairings that would be mutually advantageous to both families. You only have to look at fairly modern (in human history timescales) stories like Romeo & Juliet to see fictionalised examples of this. They were forbidden from marrying because they were from rival households, and the moral of the story is that they both end up dead for pursuing their "true love" for each other. I really think that freedom of choice in dating has been so rare throughout human history that we are only really seeing the consequences of it now for the first time since before organised society emerged.
Hollywood is different from history. In christian medieval europe it was common for fathers to not only select a good husband but the daughter also had a say in the matter whether she like the pick or not if not in many cases the father would look for another. Another thing is many fathers wouldn;t just choose some ugly or mean pig to marry their baby girl especially in those times when families had close ties as there was no school or social media to alienate parents from children. Real crusades history yt channel talks about medieval times and lists all the sources
@@aminm7714 so all you cares are the nobles and how they lived. Good to know you don t give a shit about who married that village farmer girl in that time.
The situation has come to this point because of social media. We can communicate with people instantly. If you were to ask your crush out in irl, it's much harder than just texting. Quick communication get rid of your social skills slowly. This is just a portion of the problem
And parent typically choose men who are usually well-off and good looking chad, stories about it abound in historical sources. If they could choose such men, of course, which wasn't always the case. I don't know what is worse - knowing, you were not the first choice for your wife nowadays, or knowing that you were not the first choice of your wife's parents back then.
it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice of him. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense di lei. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
Some of my female friends take advantage of this pretty hard.. My dating scene is actually pretty small, a few guys I was seeing actually knew a few of my girl friends. I was pretty honest with them from the start and we remained friends through mutual interests. Those guys, like multiple guys eventually let me know of a few things the girls used to ask of them, buy them delivery on demand, wall them off completely and say stuff like "I have options" when the guy didn't want to spend too much on food, expecting 5 star restaurants every date and worst of all, those girls talked behind my back and expected the guys to take their side blindly. The guys eventually met me and I formed a connection with them easily as we're all in the tech industry. All this time those girls were confiding in me and talking shit about the men they were seeing, saying stuff like "if he could he would" and bragging about what other men would give them. They literally create trauma in the dating scene and I have to deal with their fallout. Lowkey don't even wanna meet new people anymore, glad I'm moving away soon
I know there's good women out there. Whenever I disagree with the types you've mentioned I always get one of these two "start dating a man already", or "incel"
I work with a woman who verbatim said “We deserve to be treated like queens everyday” to another woman. These women at best, are 6’s and the woman saying this is at least 30 pounds overweight. Also that same woman has hit the wall and the other woman smoked a good portion of her life.
Okay so if/when she does date someone who may be her equal in looks and weight; she can expect that man to treat her like a queen? Because if your point is being unattractive means you have to accept poor treatment then that would only elude to the fact that incels deserve how they are being treated and you don’t want that.
@@chengechingwena8788 "if/when she does date someone who may be her equal in looks", holy cope. what world are you living in where that's reality. she will date up because she will think she deserves the best despite not looking her best either
😂okey. You are saying this because she is 6 and 30 and overweight. Short men who don’t make 6 figures who have small divks who are in their 30s ( whoever told you men get more attractive as they get older are liars. Don’t deserve to be treated like kings. They should be ignored.
I’m 20 and a girl. I’ve never dated anyone before, due to me being an anomaly (it’s because I’m asexual, so I know my value is lower. Makes me a bit sad but I deal with it). I’ve been watching wheat for a year now, and even I’m starting to wake up.
1)Expectations are the breeding grounds of disappointment. The entitlement of a belfie "model" on the gram or an OF girl (and the inevitable disappointment they will feel) is not my problem. When I encounter entitlement, I will dismiss it as unacceptable and move on as many times as I have to. 2) I would question the intelligence of anyone who extrapolates that getting the equivalent of a layup in attention online = the equivalent of a three pointer in attention IRL from people you actually WANT. Disappointment is all such a person can ever expect. In the end, I have been on my own for quite some time. It's not optimal, but I know I can do it and do it well. So, as I said in point 1, not my problem if another's mind is ruled by delusion. 3)On male thirst - Libido gap at its core. The desire is a beast that must be tamed. For one's own sake. Also, if one grinds for several years, box is a horrible motivator. Accepting a pay to play when you want companionship is also a crappy payoff. So I'd say reprioritize why you are grinding and have a different payoff in mind that isn't mediocre, like power imbalances and other low quality stuff like that. 4)On deceptive mainstream media - Gynocentrism at its core. Be a man, not a safety net. Simp has always mean prioritizing box over your own dignity and self-respect. Don't do that. There's also a difference between people who are grateful for your kindness and those who take it as weakness. You should feel no shame in pulling back and away from the latter. They're not good people. You should be able to think of yourself as an individual and differentiate between the grateful and the ingrate. True, but the mainstream can still kiss my a$$ lol 5)On evolution - Ooga Booga at its core. When survival was an issue and women didn't have their own LMS, transactions took place for efficiency. Now women have their own LMS, meaning what men previously offered in these transactional deals is no longer sufficient. So, she has to actually be attracted to you...hence the black pill ideas gaining traction. Looks is king online because there is nothing else to go on online. Bear that in mind for normies. I don't think women adapted either. They just had the benefits served to them on a silver platter. Agreed that education is essential. And no, you can't take the ooga booga out of people, but you can take the people out of ooga booga, which modern society has done. Adapt or fail. Simple as that. And since we have the propensity to reflect deeply on things like this, it is certainly possible to tame the beasts within. 6)On bluepilled men - 5 stages of grief at its core. Blackpill ideas have merit at times, but are more applicable to some (subfives) than others (normies). Charisma and confidence matter more once you no longer look like Quasi Moto. More true if you shift gears from dating apps and crappy one night stand hunting grounds like bars and clubs in favor of warm approach. While I agree that worrying about hypergamy is pointless, denying its existence is equally pointless. I don't think it's too much to handle. I see it as a full circle type deal. When I was a kid, I was more in tune with the importance of looks, then the gynocentric programming happened, and then I came back down to reality. Most people just don't want to admit they bought a faulty product. You should not buy flowers and chocolates for an ingrate. Remember that when deciding whether or not to buy them. PUA has about a 5% close rate, so it's sifting through 95% failure. I don't think that's worth it just for some box. If you're gonna engage, you should have the full story that the sunshine and rainbows leave out. But in terms of Chad, comparison is the thief of joy. He is not my concern. That being said, running from the truth when the results are clearly sh!t serves no purpose. Connect with people who are grateful and give a sh!t. Forget the rest. 7)On the simp arms race- Social engineering at its core. First world societies offer us luxuries we previously did not have. Like credit cards. It should be common sense that you don't just invest in ANYONE. Have standards. But a simp probably wouldn't understand what that even means. Leading with your wallet is a disaster waiting to happen
I'll tell you why: it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
Great video wheat. Crazy how I was discussing the simp epidemic with my coworker he agreed (he's a Chad). Crazy how it's really happening in front of us. Y'all can call wheated and black pill community incels, but when facts back it up and events start happening that line up with it.... WE ARE STILL IN THE WRONG. Thank you wheated.
When simps number rise,even chads will struggle to get girls.SIMPS are parasite for society and biggest threat for gentlemens who have self respect and value but wants a wife and family
I can't believe I bought so totally into the red pill for all those years when it never addressed the looks issue head on...it always tried to dodge it or ignore it 🙄
@@ayugoslav5554 WRONG... those guys are 45s, and in their time thing where completly different. 8-10years ago the dating was a complete different beast. Instagram and Massive datting apps adherence changed things forever. IVe aways had easy with girls. Entered in a LTR early in the tinder thing, ppl were moc ked for use tinder. Left in 2020, and holy sh it the world was completly different. NEVER ever i would dream to see landwh ales thinki ng they are the hott est sh it.
Welp I mean , I was kinda always there ya know , like on the football 🏈 team , there was always another guy that was the better quarterback and got most people and women to like him , I accepted that a long time ago , but with this redpill/black pill 💊 …. I’ve started to learn to not simp and to date on my level & to never ever even look at fat women
Stupid podcast and fresh and fit talks about so many facts EXCEPT beta buxxing. They be calling by saying men can become attractive in other ways if he’s not good looking. But I’ll say that’s just beta buxxing , she won’t you attracted to you but your money and status. And that’s what they be lying about and say it’s “fact” because women doesn’t care about looks as much as men does
Wheat Waffles should put together a curriculum and class that should be required for all high school and college men. It would help men out so much and educate them on what not to do.
Blackpill knowledge going mainstream would just mean every single guy would looksmaxx making the competition that much stiffer. Woman would begin selecting purely on unchangeable genetic factors (height, bone structure, eye color etc.) It would be a disaster.
@@Krelian4400 Blackpill was already mainstream for thousands of years. No money, no honey. But, if you are tall and attractive, women won't care about your money. All they'll want is your sperm. Woman were already selecting dudes by those traits before the dawn of the internet.
One of the biggest aspects of the redpill is bettering your life for the sake of your own personal happiness, any woman that comes along or that you’re interested in is meant to supplement an already great life you’ve built for yourself so the weeks and years of grinding I think is good advice in general wether a man wants to date or not
And I think that's the plan-pursue greatness and self development over relationships when you're single. For some reason some people are highly suspicious of self improvement. I mean yes, there is the chance of failure, and changing your life is not guaranteed, but then again, almost nothing is guaranteed in life, so you might as well give it another try and become a better person in the process.
Back when men had all the economic resources , it made sense for men to be generous to women they weren't necessary involved with closely. If men didn't do that, the whole system would implode. But at this point, when the average woman has more resources than the average man (i.e. unmarried women make more money than unmarried men). Women don't want or need men's resources any more. The problem is, it was that way for so long, there's a deep, ingrained, arguably biological preference for it. It has fucked social dynamics.
The worst part is, the equality-seeking people (bluepilled left) who have been pushing us down this path have it set in their heads that if they're somehow wrong, humanity may as well be a lost cause. They've effectively doubled down on this outcome, and will keep pushing these beliefs until a collapse occurs because to them, the ends justify the means.
that is the reason why eventually simp will get impossible to perform, economy will break and broke them, that behavior it's not sustainable, plus is sure fo everyone in the community that situation will get worse
it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice of him. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense di lei. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
@@manumaster1990 very straight, this could be seen on ford case, when they supported feminism to improve divorces and in the end a family who's had one car will need 2 or more, and more sells and services, that is the design
Is there a country, like Japan or China, that is further down the road in this regard, that can show us what the future looks like? What lessons can be learned from them?
The future looks like the past. Rich and very handsome men will have harems, while about 70% of men will have nobody. This is why there are more mass-shooters. It comes from absolute hopelessness, which is on the rise.
Asian countries are the incel capitals of the world. Maid cafes, the entire idol industry and to some extent Hostess Clubs are coping mechanisms for the probably 80% male virginity rate. Hell, mukbang began in Korea because virgin men wanted to eat food with women even through a screen. Japan especially has made cope into an art form.
it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice of him. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
And its only getting worse. Cute women 18-25 are having a lot of mental issues and although having acces to unlimited sex are often devoid of actual intimicy. Succesful guys in that range just want to hook up and the guys that mean well are ignored to become bitter/shun the dating market completely. Its already getting really bad right now with women 35-40 who can't find a good long term partner while nearly 70% of men are not or rarely having sex
While most red pill guys blame women for the harsh dating game....which is true to a certain extent,i believe that simps are without a doubt the main reason as to why the dating has become so harsh for average guys. However there's no stopping them now especially with the invention of Only Fans etc the simping epidemic will just increase even more.
What the hell are you talking about dude? It is not only simps fault, but more hypocricy of women, because they are the ones who benefit from it. You cannot judge simps too, because they are dudes who cannot stand against not only 10% but also against average joe, and they are the majority. So they seek for alternative options.
@@RU-vidModeratorsSuckMyBalls the thing is that simps have made even a 5/10 woman believe she's a 9/10 and she then has an over inflated ego. The reason why the average guy has difficult time dating is because of these simps. It's not a woman's fault when her ego rises coz these simps are responsible for that 💯
@@kabir1557 i am not refusing your claim, i am not defending the simps. I just want you to think broader. Yes simps are the reason why girls feel themselves like queens, but look at the situation from different angle. There are average, below the average and top tier guys. And proportionally they consist of about 20%, 70% and 10% of all male population. If top and middle get the vast majority of girls, what is left for 70%? Of course they will satisfy this need donating girls and watching the pronography. After which girls due their mercantilistic nature will exploit their unstisfied s...xeual needs for their ownpurposes. As a result, causing problem in dating sphere for all males in general. It is what is called "survival". I want to say that the reason why simps become simps is that no one cares about others and only about themselves. With the same logic simps cause trouble for other guys, because they do not care about other guys, about consequences of their action. We live in society where no one cares about anyone, where everyone survives, so simps and arrognant girls and dating problems are inevitable consequences. Simps are surviving as the way they can, middle are surviving in their own way, top tier do not need to survive they just enjoy the life. As a result everyone has problems. So hating them is also inevitable consequence. But i want you to realize it is pointless. You can do nothing against simps, just because for simps simping is only available option right now to satisfy their s...xual needs, they exist and will exist, cause life is unfair in general and people are ignorant and arrognant
I had a talk the other day with a friend who is not into red pill but just know the basic of it and he said to me. Let me get this straight... I have to go to the gym 6 times a week, work my ass of to make atleast 6 figures, be social popular online, pay for all the dating and be emotional and masculine just to attrackt a 5/10 who will almost certianly leave me when a better option comes along and doing so will try and take as many resources she can get when she leaves.... then he went fuck that shit
it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice of him. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense di lei. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
It doesn’t affect me. I don’t participate. I just work, hit the gym hard, and eat well. I could care less what these simps are doing, as long as I’m not doing it. The way I see it, as long as I’m masculine, have a nice ripped physique with some height, then I’m good. I’ll just be alone, with good health lol. Besides I already had my share of women, been married before, and have two kids. So why in the hell would I need to participate in this garbage. There would be no point for me.
I love it when people say looks don't matter. I reply, "If that's the case, then it doesn't have to be a man or a woman? You can just fall in love with who is on the inside?" By it's very nature it's superficial. One starts by cutting out over 50% of the population immediately. Then there's age, and it goes on from there. You are first driven via biochemicals visually, then proceed to the philosophy (is she/he a good person, habits that annoy me ,etc.). If the philosophical (mental) part is a turn off, then the only option is maybe some bedroom fun. If the person doesn't evoke a biochemical response, no amount of the philosophical will turn you on - or else you could date your own sex. Plenty of people in the same sex have fantastic personalities, but they aren't turning you on (unless you are homosexual and then it's all vice-versa). The exemption to this is if they *almost* hit the line of turn on, then "who they are" can make up the small difference.
@@Westcoastrocksduh Choose one of those: 1. She is using you for money, attention and/or being taken care of since she got cheated on by her last boyfriend until she dumps you 2. she is cheating or even cucking on you 3. you are lying, she is either a 4-5 at best or simply made up by you
@fff it's not luck, it's skill. I got two gf's that are both 8s. If it was luck I would have lost both of them long ago. Work and make yourself your first mental point of origin. I don't care if I loss them, more will find me.
I admit I've simped when I was in a relationship with my ex in the past when I was hardcore blue pill.. I loved her and let shit slide, but you could say that's just love at the same time in a way! But these basement dwellers actually full on simping like the way they are makes me sick man wtf.. :(
it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice of him. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense di lei. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
Being male, I’m biologically inclined like and praise women but there’s so few of them that are likeable and praise worthy. When I’ve had to work at clubs, the girls I see make me physically sick. Being forced without consent into a state of “misogyny” 90% of the time, when there is a high quality woman, my brain wants to make up for lost time and unleash simp like energy. On the 3 occasions I did date a nice girl, it was such a relief to be able to be kind and affectionate to a woman that deserved it after years of being disgusted by women collectively. It’s the same reason I get a dopamine hit from praising certain Kpop stars, as they represent a positive version of femininity that’s nowhere to be found and praised in the West (with some exceptions).
appreciate you being honest that's a valid point although i might have to disagree with the kpop thing but overall what u said is sooo true shit is goin downhill
Good contribution, but I'd advise you to look into how K-Pop stars are 'born'. It's some of the least positive and toxic stuff you've ever seen, not a huge deal different from Western female singers esp girlbands
There’s a degree of truth there, but when using male model tinder accounts, I’ve seen that often even when Aussie girls are attracted to a guy, they cannot be pleasant towards him because they simply don’t know how to be pleasant. They know how to say “Get over here and give me d” but they don’t know how to ask questions about you, or speak about themselves because most of the interactions they’ve had have been either bullying an unattractive man or aggressively trying to get immediate sex from an attractive man, never simply just talking to another person. Yeah, I’ve only scratched the surface of Kpop and there could be a lot of feral stuff that goes on under the table. It’s just refreshing to see a video clip that doesn’t have baboon mating dances (AKA twerking) and vulgar lyrics.
it's a social construction maneuver induced by global corporations to increase hyper-consumerism. think about it. all marketing companies know that women are more fickle, emotional and frivolous in general, they spend much more on products than a man who in general is more practical and logical in his choice of him. their goal is to transfer as much money as possible into the hands of women who are more likely to spend it on products than men. they do this in multiple ways: 1. By encouraging high standards for women, they make it more likely that they will be single, which means that the costs of the house are not shared but are all at her expense. 2. by encouraging divorces that benefit women economically. between alimony, movable and immovable property etc. the more resources a woman has the more she will spend. 3. increasing the variety and diversity of commercial advertisements. 4. effeminating more and more men to make them women 2.0 as regards their predisposition to spend money on nonsense. 5. through planned obsolescence. in which especially textile and electronic products are specially made fragile so that there is a need to buy them again and again and again ... 6. By encouraging "simp" behavior in men, you are encouraging them to spend money. plain and simple. that's all companies want. 7. increasing the ease with which money can be spent through debit cards etc. 8. By encouraging women to work, they make them more independent which means higher standards, more spending on products, and more production for companies. everything goes in this direction, my explanation makes everything clear.
it's never been a welcoming place for men, low class men have always been viewed as expendable by society, why do you think droves were sent off to die in wars throughout history?
It blows my mind at HOW bad simps are affecting the dating market. I’m a pretty good looking guy. Not a model, but certainly handsome. 4-5 years ago I got plenty of matches and even hooked up and went on dates with some girls who were solid 8s. These days, 5s and 6s think they’re too good for an even better version of myself then I had 4-5 years ago. It’s nuts
Your point at 11:40 is absolutely spot on how bluepilled channels are the most followed, and blackpilled are least. I didn't know who the first channel was from the image so I looked up "dating advice". That channel (Psych2Go) was the FIRST channel that popped up.
Just by their thumbnail alone (drawing a blank what that thing is called) you can tell it's a rainbows and lollipops channel. All a guy has to do is show up in a carriage drawn by six white horses type of thing.
As a woman who loves to watch your channel, it's true what you said. As I became conscious on how I swiped right on men profile, I realized I made decisions basing on the picture first. If i find it attarctive, I then read the bio. Some I find super attractive, I don't even read the bio. It's shallow and I hate myself for being that way. The knowledge I gain here made me sympathize and understand guys perspective. I will share your channel with my girl friends, so that little by little we could change our behavior. To treat men as human beings, not object to inflate one's ego on social media.
its human nature, if you want good looking men i cant blame you or make you feel guilty about it. its your choice. but its good your self aware about it.
Yes, in any (sane) society highly desired guy would marry a highly desired woman, and yeah, a Chad would have slept around a lil bit in 1950s, too. But now that this behaviour is rampant, just average women get their egos boosted all the time because casual fun from Chads is relatively easily accessible, at least in 20s. This forces average guys to settle for whichever leftovers that are still available for him. But if you're below average you have pretty much nothing left for you.
What you mean? If u was a Chad who had multiple baddies who wanna be with u, would u give that up for 1 woman who'll probably end divorcing u or leaving u with ur dick in ur hand in a sexless marriage?? The only difference between him and u is he won the generic lottery. I can't blame Chads for being men.
I went on a thirsty Bumble date with a chick I would never approach in public to a bar I choose at random. This date made me give up on western women here’s why 1. She was a 4’11 HARD 5 with makeup on and acted like she was Megan fox 2. More than a few dudes at this random bar in a very big city knew her by name 3. She was thee most boring person I’ve ever met 4. Her expectations and constant contradictions made my head spin when she had nothing going for her 5. Her only interest was her “super hot cousins” and TiK tok
Great video but actually it is way worse, according to data from dating apps, only 4,5% are "attractive", while 79% are seeing as "unattractive", while the 16% left are more or less "worth traying". So based on this video 80% are forced out, 15% are struggling and only 5% are accepted.
To be honest, I believe women also start to face the harsh reality of dating when they get to their late 30s or have kids. The tide does then turn. I am registered at online dating sites and there are a high proportion of ladies in their early to late 40s, look good, with Masters degree, good careers etc but appear to be perpetually single and seeking! Guess still hoping for Chad.
@@brianwaller7383 That is why these 304's like all feminist believe in the strong and independent ideology.That is all and good during their child bearing years,but once they reach their middle age,that wall is going to smack them in the head real hard lol
12:50 Inflation is a thing. You didn't calculate it in. Poorer, actually. Look how harder it is to buy the same house. 40 years ago, you had to work 5 years to buy new house, today, 12 years. And shouldn't have technology improved easier building? Yes. But corporate employers squeeze their employees as much as possible profit they can get. WE ARE POORER THAN BEFORE.
He said in a video before that the luxury of today will be the average standard of tomorrow. 250k is the new 100k a year . Money and status are just as important as looks, if not more. You absolutely need to master the 3 aspects of LMS
@@randomargument972 ikr, I don't know if he was being serious or sarcastic about it. Although is true people are using more credit than before, that won't last much.
