If anything,I think the judge is too easy-going, especially with the defense. This defense team is like a steam roller. We haven't gotten to see much of the prosecutor so far. That's coming!
I thought so, but she’s being fair and keeping the trial safe. A few instances would have resulted in prejudice or skepticism. Analyze the sustains; sometimes, lawyers want to get something in the juror's head, knowing it will get sustained to influence them.
I don't ubderstand the relation ship between Katie and Ksitlin. Could you explain to me why Katie would not want their fruendship to be known. I am honestly asking why.
@@user-ux1xx3bq7f It shows bias and motive to lie for one of her best friends since childhood. Karen is an outsider. Everyone in this case is connected to the Alberts in one way or another, from the "witnesses" to the lead investigator, all the way up through the DAs office -- even the judge!! Also, Katie McLaughlin was the first person to report that Karen said, "I hit him." She could have started that line of conversation throughout the firehouse and other people adopted this phrase - or something similar - to their own testimony -- and we've seen this proven when the defense questions these first responders about the inconsistencies in their statements/testimony. This defense team has already made many of them have to eat their own words regarding their recollection of events. Hope that helps explain why she, along with her credibility, is so important in this case. Plus, there's the fact that she is willing to blatantly lie on the stand, knowing it has the potential to send an innocent woman to prison for the rest of her life. Curious what your thoughts are?
I had been hearing about this judges huffing and puffing and completely unprofessional behavior in her role, but nothing could have prepared anyone for this level of contempt for the defendant and her team of lawyers! Whoever nominated her for the title of your honor should be ashamed of themselves for putting this incompetent and prejudiced judge in charge of something as important as a murder trial! Absolutely disgusting behavior!
So why is no one asking why NO one from the house came outside to check on why all the police ambulances and fire engines were at their house? And especially after that one female went in the house?? I find that so very strange!! If Karen Read was screaming that certainly heard that from in the house.. Please make it make sense
There seems to be a cover up. This judge is friendly with the Alberts and the McCabes. She should have recused. This judge actually used the Alberts vacation home.
@daniebond that has been something that has been brought up to all the people who think she’s guilty, yet not one person can answer it. Nicole and Brian Albert, the home owners, said in their initial statement that they were asleep and had no idea anything was going on outside on their front lawn. Once the Feds got involved, they obtained the phone records for all the people who were inside that house (information the defense requested and the judge denied) the phone records showed they were lying. Nicole Albert received, and answered, a call from Jen McCabe (her sister) between 6:15-6:30. She was either awake, or woken up by the call and knew what was happening. So far during the trial, every single time the defense asks any of the witnesses if they were made aware that the home owner was a Boston police officer, Lally objects and the judge sustains it. No idea what legal grounds she has for sustaining those questions because they seem pretty pertinent in my opinion. She is the one preventing things from going in that direction. She is SO biased it’s disgusting. Not surprising - when the defense filed a motion asking her to recuse herself, she denied it. What’s even more interesting is the fact that she’s now only hearing civil cases. However, she INSISTED that she would keep this case on her calendar, instead of having it reassigned. No red flags here. 🙄
His core temp was 80? I read that core temp after death will drop around 1.5 degrees an hour. Being generous here, if his base body temperature was let’s say a low 95 because it’s cold out and lets double the rate to 3 degrees an hour, being generous because it was cold out. That’s 95 - 80 = 15. Then 15 / 3 per hour would mean he had been dead for 5 hours and that is being generous. This would indicate that he would have died around 1am? There was camera evidence of Karen driving around 5am. If she hit him around then and he died, then wouldn’t his body temperature be warmer? This makes me doubt the cause of death was from her car at 5am
@@christopherdoyle2743 I haven’t proven anything. If my math is wrong or there is a better explanation, please let me know. If you are intentionally being rude to me, please stop, that isn’t nice.
She was driving around looking for him at 5 am when he didn’t come home. I do believe your math is correct and she hit him around 1 am upon arriving at party central
@@StephSilva-qw1lm so you are stating that she hit him at 1am. Drove his dead body back home. Dumped his body on the driveway when she arrived at the house. Then made it look like she accidentally backed into him at 5am when she went to go look for him? That’s an interesting theory. Is there any evidence of the events transpiring at party central?
So they are claiming that Karen hit him in the face only with her car oh and and a dog must’ve jumped in front of the car first biting him and took off with his sneaker this is insane!
Why do you and others still go on about a dog ? Lol. The defence has taken that off their table as it was known long ago that no animal was involved here. No animal DNA. Why it was put out in the media early days was to get a reaction and to have more Karen read fans. Doggy didn’t do it. About time you and others wiped that myth out.
@@stevenprice6957 no not a myth! He was attacked by that German shepherd when Brian and his nephew were beating him to death and then dragged him out to the curb to make it look like a snow plow hit him! They got rid of that dog immediately they dug up the foundation of their basement to hide the blood and then they sold their house only to move into the same town!! Everyone knows the truth!! You can’t hide the truth!! No dog DNA are you kidding me these people use red solo cups to collect evidence and a snowblower you really think that the DNA would be accurate and not bias? You’re obviously a fan of Brian Albert.
I hope these jurors are smart and find her not guilty because if not this will be the next Netflix show from MA with a cover up of a dead police officer and will feel bad when they find out the truth. I wouldn’t want to take seats another persons freedom if they are innocent. I don’t know any of these people but I live in MA and the corruption needs to stop
it is beyond difficult to watch this trial and, as i stated on day 2, watch the judge constantly interfere with the defense's cross examination. Even with no objections from the prosecution, she interrupts and calls senseless side bars and even a recess! Is she trying to throw Jackson off track?? It will never happen, the guy is a genius! Frankly, if she continues these behaviors (and I have no doubt she will), it could annoy the jurors as well which in turn could help Karen.
one thing that is troubling me is karens outburst to cops after second arrest where she said last time she seen john was getting his head pummeled against the back of her car by to officers that where in the house , she knows something and is not entirely innocent .
This judge is a joke. I've seen many trials, but never seen such a judge. A 10-year-old could tell that she doesn't give a damn about the defense and is trying to help the prosecutors, which are terrible at their job. Also, the paramedic is lying his ass off pretending he cannot recall even though he sees it in the video. This is all a joke.
I don't understand the lawyer's point of trying to impeach the para specifically about "I hit him" when she admitted that she said it,with a little twist.
One Quick question. What it was the plow guy that hit John. ? But they thought it was Karen and framed her. The plow guy. Did they investigate him or his truck. ?
There is a very fair apple podcast about this layered case of Karen Read, made by Brandi Churchwell Apple Podcasts 1-11 parts till now. It is called "Conspiracy in Canton". Fastest way forward to to find out everything about this case, and also everyone involved with their names and what they did.
If she is innocent, OJ SIMPSON IS A SAINT😂😂😂😂😂😂… the lawyer is good playing chess with the questions , but you can’t rob the robber …he tells you that he wants to focus on the bottom video , stops and says let me direct you to the top , that’s when Karen read is pulled to the side and the I hit him came about , but he creates a diversion hoping that the jury misses that detail … she needs to go to jail😂😂😂😂😂😂
So far, not one report of the incident; whether written by responding PD or FD reports Read said "I hit him". If she did say it, how did it get left out of EVERY. SINGLE. REPORT? Was EVERY responder that night completely incompetent at how to report a scene?
@LittleWoman411 I saw an interview where she does admit saying it but it was only questioning herself. Panic? Confusion? I don't think she's guilty at all but apparently she did say this but that absolutely is mo proof of guilt
lets see shes backed into a car previously without stopping, she was drunk, made the statement she hit him and had a fight with him before..... ummmmmmm guilty
Tinfoil crowd??? Have you even watched this trial??? Every single witness the commonwealth has called, the defense has destroyed on cross. The first officer to testify - his nonchalant attitude about important documents being completely wrong was disturbing. Then the way he so casually said “it was a misstep” because he just “forgot” to mention the tiny detail about hearing Karen say “I did this” “I hit him”. Now you have paramedics testifying on direct about what they did, but when they get questioned by the defense, they “don’t recall”. How can you say “I was performing chest compressions, helped wheel him into the ambulance to get him warm. Once we got in, we closed the doors and I didn’t get back out” but then the defense attorney shows you some video footage, asks you some questions and suddenly you “don’t remember” whether you got in the ambulance and stayed there or helped load the patient in and went back to get any leftover supplies…….. if they told the truth when they wrote their report on 1/29/22, and told the truth when giving their statement to the police 9 days later, and told the truth when testifying before the grand jury, then they would know EXACTLY what they did at the scene and it would be easy to answer the questions while on the witness stand for the trial. Like the saying goes “if you tell the truth, you don’t need to have a good memory”. The commonwealth is going to continue to call witnesses and the defense is going to continue to destroy their credibility. By the time the commonwealth rests, it will be abundantly clear that Karen did not do this. You can’t claim people who believe Karen is innocent are “conspiracy theorists” because every single thing that any of us bring up as to WHY she’s innocent are all FACTS. Honestly, I would love to hear what FACTS led you to your opinion!?
Deadly Karen. If only she had gotten help when this happened, a man could have been saved. Instead she saved her own back and left him to freeze to death. Cold as ice Read.
Really I am not a bot. Officer Okeefe arrested the nephew of the cop who owns the house. They deleted their phone info got rid of the dog within a few days and sold their home. Cover up! Yeah, Karen Reed intentionally drove her car into her boyfriend, hitting his face, but prior to a dog jumped out biting his forearm as they are trained to, took his sneaker and ran off. They should’ve went into that house knowing he was coming out of that house and they all knew eachother but they didn’t cuz it’s a cover up! Just like Detective Mulligans cover up to cover up for the other detectives !! So do bits write like but nice try trying to make people think all of who disagree are bots. I know what bits are like and there are none on this feed because bots main job is to scam people out of money
@@BrainJail I have a comment thread on this video where I addressed the evidence. I wish I had access to all the evidence because I have too many questions that need to be answered. (I was joking about the bot comments. I see people make this unfounded argument every time and it’s frustrating)
