What Did Jeffrey Epstein Want With Stephen Hawking? - Eric Weinstein 

Delayed gratification might be good for us but bloody hell mate you make it difficult with some of these clips.

Thank you! When Eric speaks I listen

please interview Bret Weinstein next :)

Would have been better if you had just released it, we watch everything you make but drip feeding clips to hype seems pointless and annoying, after I’ve listed to all the clips because it all I can get them I listen to the whole episode and have skip 9 minutes I’ve already heard, I get it l, it’s better for your view count because it artificially adds multiple views to the same content but it’s annoying and feels shitty from a follower point of view

Don’t release the episode. This 8 minutes and 56 seconds sample was a hard watch as it is.

Exactly this! I totally agree

I’ve done public speaking and studied it prior, and yes; pausing to allow for reflection, pondering, or digestion of ideas, or questions etc and making eye contact with your audience is important in maintaining their engagement and anticipation.

Ah, the results of a neverending flashy stream of 300 MPH have-it-right-now 30 second average "shorts" or clips on these platforms, scrolling one straight in to the next. Constant noise, movement and stimulation becomes a pacifier. People have been so systematically conditioned, or socially engineered to have such short attention spans so much now that it makes them feel uncomfortable to slow it down, stop and reflect within a discussion like these fine gentlemen do.

I notice the difference in the medical field. Getting someone’s vital signs now (I still take blood pressure manually), vs 20 years ago is vastly different. People’s eye movements are frequent, they can’t just sit and look at the wall or the floor, they don’t know where to look, they don’t know what to do with their hands without their phone, they don’t know what to do in general when there’s a few seconds of no talking, or if there’s a few seconds of silence in general. They either have to be moving, talking or they have to get out their phone. It’s moderately infuriating.

Agreed. It’s understating things to say he’s thoughtful but he’s just thoughtful It’s bizarre how certain critiques are infectious. Talking about him in this way is like a trend of some sort Granted I will say he’s not great at packaging and delivering a point which is to say he’s not great at simplifying what he’s talking about. But he’s sooooo much better than he used to be …I assume he’s aware of this.

Chris ain't better that's why he know so much

Not even two minutes in and already had a feeling how this interview was gonna go so I checked the comments and now I won't bother with the video.

lol he doesn’t know either

​@Lydynthmn it really was a waste of time

Mr House of Lords 🤦 our science pop stars are useless to humanity but tell everyone else we are stupid. And will watch us die over that elite accreditation and the But he was a friend of mine and a colleague shit 🗑️

…& E’s not the only one. At best he was a C- student in his construct.

“We”… Most people are ignorant

And yet the vast majority are not ready to know the truth, or even not want to know the truth. The ignorant masses are only focussed on J.E. island and his "events" and are completely enthralled by it. A great diversion if ever there was one. I for one want to know the powerful people behind J.E., what their 'intentions' are and 'why'. Is it still the same (((people))) Jesus called out years ago or is it another family or tribe I wonder. 🤔 Either way, those behind the curtain are still there because all the fools are focussed on J.E. immoral acts.

I think his point is that enough people aren't asking about the people behind Epstein, the people that created the construct called Jeffrey Epstein .

If Chris genuinely wants answers he should interview Whitney Web b. But he'd better be prepared for what he learns.

It's the Socratic Method, not the Ventura Method

@@oddthequiet4868 True. The Ventura method is to lie about being a Navy SEAL, which this guy has not done.

Down in the Baja

Twice. 😆

more than twice

This

lol OH the drama. Just needed a little music.

It would have been edited, but CW is just trying to eats viewer minutes with this crap.

Its not a better question, we know what they wanted from Epstein, degeneracy and secual encounters that he could provide. Epsteins reasons and handlers aren't being discussed enough because they also own the media

Women. Hawking was a notorious horndog.

@@vortex_1336little women apparently

Funding

Laptop dance

Girls or money.

We often forget that Epstein was a rich lister, with an island, very charming and fun to hang out with. Pretty much everyone wanted to hangout with Jeffrey Epstein, so why not the most famous physicist on the planet? It was only after some allegations came out against him in the early 2000s that he was involved in sex trafficking that his popularity took a hit but many still stuck by him cos, remember, many just thought they were allegations brought against him by his "enemies" who were jealous of him and his money. Of course, as more evidence came out, it became a different story. So really, there is no question why Hawking wouldn't want to hang out with Epstein. Everyone famous enough and rich enough did at one point.

Or both

Both were spies

Probably just Steven Hawking's autograph and maybe conversations with a very famous physicist. How hard is it to believe Steven Hawking's has millions of fans. That's just a fact.

that was a crazy episode

😂😂😂😂😂

It’s a power play

Funny cause EVERY interview of this guy is like that, EVERY 1...

The Elite Breeding Program was totally swept away.. the NM Ranch, the student recuts from MIT, Harvard and other Ivy League Universities.. where are all the children??? This went on for years..

😂😂😂

No he bought underage girls with cash so it wouldn't be traced.

Island wasn't just for sex was a hospitial for extreme rich doing stuff that's illegal human testing type stuff brain transplant type attempts

I think this is his third appearance.

Eric Weisnstein gets the "unclear on the concept award." Epstein had no interest or ability, whatsoever, in theoretical physics. Rather he collected prominent people, and insinuated himself into elite institutions, to burnish his image of brilliance and invincibility. In turn, that's what he peddled to his "VIP johns," and to the naive girls he scammed.

He fooled too! Don’t feel bad. I thought he had something to say as well but then I looked behind the curtain.

I can only think that all the criticisms in this comments section are because they don't want to admit how much went over their heads. What a challenging interviewee, and yes, great chemistry between them. GREAT moment when Eric just said "hm" with a slight nod, and then penetrating stare for 6 whole seconds. Too many people thing if they're not being spoonfed, there's nothing nutritious to be had.

"fumfer"--never heard that before but love it. I will use it from time to time while tipping my proverbial cap to you.

no man, heres how that should have gone. '' bit surprised hawking was on his list'' eric, '' well he seemed to gather any notable person (including eric himself.) in any field, for future connections or possible compromising'' there how long did that take you to read, do you have time to watch eric doing social verbal wheelies over and over. talk is cheap sucka's

Totally with you here... I see Eric's point clearly... and can see exactly why he posits the questions to the questions... its his way of saying "Do you want to go down a useless tangent that will produce no results or insight.... or do you want to stop studying string theory (or the conversational equivalent of it) and think of this MORE relevant question that gets you to your answer much more efficiently and directly. I honestly believe that Eric W. is a great litmus test for those who can think critically and those who are trying very hard but it is mostly going over their capability to understand the larger concept and frame of reference. I see this quite often. What happens to me when I watch an Eric W back and forth is I am half the time baffled at the questions given him as if the interviewer shouldn't be so daft at getting to the meat of the problem... OR Eric asks an even better question that makes me realized I have also been looking at the wrong portion of the problem. It sharpens one's ability to get past the noise to the most applicable part of the issue at hand.

Makes sense.

That’s all he does on any of the podcasts I’ve seen him on.

Dude would make a great politician😂

There’s a major difference between someone who is avoiding a question and someone who is using the Socratic method. He ultimately does answer the question, but he very wisely starts by asking the interviewer to give his answers first. If nothing else, he at least clarified the question before answering it. And it is also true that the answer basically is, “We don’t actually know the answer, but we can speculate as to what the answer might be. We can also perhaps find a way to ask a better question.”

Limitless power in the form of travel. They talk about time travel on the web. Epstein was looking for limitless power. That was his answer. I love that he builds up to the answer; he wants you to think. That’s what a good teacher does/

He can't. Some of what he knows may require a security clearance. Legally you can't say anything, but you can ask questions and talk about surrounding topics until the audience comes to their own conclusions.

it gives the impression that hes hiding something

@@petetony310 He is hiding something. He knows, or suspects things he can't say or they would come after him, so he's giving us the cryptic clues to work it out for ourselves.

Let them think the answers are their idea 👍

The Lolita Star?

It already exists. Just ask the residents of Maui, Chile and Paradise California?

Indeed. An awesome guest.

bingo. Just another name dropping piece. Enroute to compromising the kings and queens one must play many pawns.

Pretty sure he figured it out because I told him.

He always knew because they are both Mossad

@@pinnitt if so he did a pretty bad job shutting up. Not every Jew is a Zionist and not every Zionist is an operative.

He didn't figure out epstein. Certainly wasnt the first. Per his own recollection he had an interaction that he found extremely strange and off putting and thought he might be a "construct".

​@@pinnittthis

Weinstein is very full of very hot air.

He has a unique way. But guess what? We NEED different styles of communication.

@@stephj9378 Do we, really? Guess what, you say? Well thankyou for your profound words of wisdom. I see why you like Weinstein's patronising, cringe inducing delivery.

Are you Egyptian? What's significant about the 👁️?

next.....lmnt?

it's a long story@@dco1019

a set for each guy

long story@@dco1019

Bingo, I knew the guy and he was extremely boring. There is no conspiracy other than he managed to acquire an island where famous people didn't have to worry about the papparazi when they partied. There was no cabal or big secret, his parties had thousands of attendess..but people want a 'list' lol.

The reason why people are suspicious is because Epstein paid people to cover-up allegations of Hawking having sex with minors, which means that he was somehow afraid of that allegation leading back to him. That doesn't mean Hawking is guilty, but it also makes him rather suspicious.

Ur saying epstein didn't abuse underage girls ?​@stoneneils

So tell more. Was he a friend to the girls?​@@stoneneils

@RandomYTCommenter ready it wrong I imagine mb

It doesn't occur to you that calling out those hiding in "high places," who are pulling the strings could be dangerous? He's thi, "How should I word this?"

One chooses answers strategically, especially when it's important. That seems obvious.

@@aeronmb He never answered the question and that’s the point.

What trolls?

He's a liar. I've listens to hours of him and his epstien story charges every time he tells it

Bingo!

Giving us the right questions

5 months late but I sincerely appreciate this comment.

Absolutely! He knows, or suspects something, but can't say it.

@@Ladle66he used the pedos to destroy the pedos

bahaha that's it! He saw the future and with the help of hawkins and others he wormholed his way out!! That probably explains why the cameras were on the fritz!!

I never thought he was dead anyways.

Isn’t it interesting how the establishment either makes a person a criminal by piling up charges or accusing them of trafficking underage girls?

That’s exactly what Eric Weinstein said

My guess is physicists are good at Quantitative Mathematics, what use is that to Epstein? Helping him write software that can help him predict and analyze market trends.. what are the banks current "hot shots" Quants.. aka, Quantitative Analysts. So given this was in the 90's, he would have been part of an early pack of banks trying to forecast stocks to buy and sell, and when. Because how did Epstein make money? Stock Market.

it's lazy and annoying... and guessing there are a lot of precocious community college kids here

It made me think also. Think that; anyone who is taking the time to lead me down the garden path that Jeffery Epstein was just a pawn using his career of leveraging powerful people by exploiting their weaknesses of lust, to obtain secrets of physics for some unnamed world power, perhaps has reason to distract me from the fact Epstein used young girls and trapped many middle aged men who made his acquaintance…

Right,i would have just said hell if I know

Annnnd that would most likely be the Mossad...or at the very least, a Mossad/CIA joint effort. Do you see the power that you would have over a nation's foreign and domestic policy making if you have explosive, career-ending blackmail materials involving a good many of the people responsible for crafting and voting on those policies? Let's take that a step further and say that you have those same kind of materials on people that have very valuable insider information about the stock market? Do you see the economic potential in using the threat of releasing those materials to attain insider stock information? Now, look at alllllll the people Epstein had associations with and all the people that were reportedly regulars on his "Lolita Express" and on his island. Do you see the power in leveraging that kind of threat? Now, consider the idea that the weilder isn't really "Epstein," but the Mossad and possibly CIA as well...

Really? I've always thought of him as just the face or even member of a much bigger entity behind him.

@@dboi4952 U are right. I don’t know what I was thinking. Of course he was just a pawn being used by very powerful people that we never hear about. I’m sure he was just one of the many people that were being used by the elites nefarious and disgusting acts

😂😂😂

Wow... That is spot on. I have heard the story so often and heard it retreaded too often that it has taken on fantastical elements

😂😂😂 goated comment

never gets to the heart of the question ... always "turns things around" ... pretends to know stuff hes not saying

He’s a natural philosopher.

Yes. I think he posts the full one Monday

Say more.

Limitless?? SATORU GOJO MENTIONED 🗣🗣🗣💯💯💯RAAAAH WHAT THE FUCK IS A WORLD CUTTING DISMANTLE ♾️♾️

That depends: If you’re just interested in his work, that’s probably fine. But if you’re trying to lure him into an international blackmail racket alongside many other powerful people. Then that’s a bit dodgy.

@@andybrice2711 Agreed, yet impossible to ever know now.

yes. yes it does.

They were nerding out a bit much…..if the question is what would Epstein (and the intel networks he works for) want with Stephen Hawking it might not be about understanding or possessing Hawking’s knowledge They want to blackmail leading scientists so that they will support different agendas that they push So whether you have a preventable pandemic or you’re wanting the world to obsess about the climate so that you can restructure society….if renowned scientists are in sync with the narrative/propaganda, it’s useful So the real question is what other leading scientists are blackmailed?

I feel like he’s being cautious and getting us the info by deduction of questions and answers

I do believe its that simple. 100%

That’s what he’s saying. J w was a currency trader publicly. Satirical metaphor he’s a currency trader but what’s the currency.

It’s really intriguing when I think I do some bad shit. These guys are multi dimensional

Epstein made money in th stock market.. Physicists were the early "Quantity Analysts" he was using is connection to physics to help build stock market forecasting models/software. Physics is widely used in banking and stockmarkets..

I hear your ice bucket analogy and maybe. Certainly his ALS was his great challenge in life and he did well comparatively.

Dude right? Wtf lol i know i just smoked but im not THAT high

Well there’s a conspiracy theory I haven’t heard yet. Are you trolling? Or is there a reason you believe that?

Yawn

IKR?? That damn Socrates, making people do some work to get understanding instead of spoonfeeding them like every other so-called genius.

@@j3ffn4v4rr0 It may well make for a great teacher maybe not such a great interviewee.

I thought he was a math teacher. Did he teach physics also?

eraserhead

Let's say public science. Non-public science is probably 150 - 300 years ahead of public science.

@@HerrLoeblich Let's not .

@@jamesparker4471well that's the point of an offer. you can also refuse ;-)