What Does the Bible Say About the ICE AGE? 

Atheists always make the best Christians.

Praise the Lord! Awesome testimony 🙂

Maybe Noah took a poodle and a fox on board and all canines descended from them!?

@@JHowardKY Theists make the best atheists they have already heard all the crap and are no longer fooled by it seems we are getting conversions at an ever increasing rate.

@@sterlingfallsproductions3930Funny thing is, I find most atheists are clueless about the basics of the theory of evolution. For example, can you provide me with the mathematical proof for the time that it would take for a single celled organism to evolve into a multi-trillion celled organism? Should be fairly easy if evolution is proven science, right?

Absolutely, and some species never change. There are fish in the fossil records still alive today, and they look identical to their ancestors.

But not a speces

6,000 years, not 600 :)

I breed Dog's and I approve of this message

@@barbaramayer5182 A species is an arbitrary term that we invented, the term species as real as math and nothingness. We can think about them but in reality they are all terms for phenomena much more complex than labels can describe

The difference between Knowledge and Wisdom is the understanding that Wisdom comes from God.

Mainstream Paleoentologist, and Geologists don't refer to a biblical agenda they deal in facts that fly in the face of the Bible.

Daniel 12: 4 says knowledge will be increased, but what Scripture says people will not understand it? Im sure none. And it's not knowledge if it isn't understood. Knowledge of what the Scriptures really say is not understood by virtually all people tho. Maybe that's what you refer to. One example is There are 7 Scriptures commanding the 7th Day Sabbath: Exodus 20: 10. Exodus 23: 12. Exodus 31: 15 and 16. Exodus 35: 2. Leviticus 23: 3. Genesis 2: 2 and 3. There are 0 Scriptures commanding a weekly sun day observance. 0. Those Scriptures sighted as justification do not say nor mean that. For example Acts 20: 7 refers to the yearly Shavuot/Pentecost commanded in Leviticus 23.

Yeah but I’m trying.

@@garyfrancis6193 Good luck with that. 😅

Amen

Ye given an excellent verse

😢

Yeshua Hamashiach The Mighty Creator!

Really? God was good when he ordered humans to kill every living thing in a city? That's good is it?

Almost all the biology in this video is wrong

You've been had.

⁠@@anniedarkhorse6791☝️🤓

@@anniedarkhorse6791 Or you have

it's fantasy. There are no facts, no evidence that supports creation. NONE. The Bible was written by men in the Bronze Age. It is not a science text. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean that God did it. It means you don't understand.

@@razark9 great question! The answer is the God of the Bible. We know this because NASA has published a list of qualities that would be required in order for the Big Bang to occur and all those qualities are attributes that describe the God of the Bible. Please accept observable science. Declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

@@razark9 Which God do you think he means? Bet your guess will be correct.

And how did you come to such a conclusion? Please describe the data you analyzed and the methodologies you employed to reach such a conclusion.

@@Theo_Skeptomai type "believe in God in 5 minutes" in the search. There you will see a brief presentation by an accredited scientist who uses settled science to make a simple semantical connection atheists don't want made but cannot refute. After viewing the video if you have further questions feel free to discuss, but if you are willing to accept the observable facts please declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

Indeed

Nothing more defiling than a cancer or other disease caused by "god's divine design" and nothing more admirable than elite scientists manipulating DNA trying to find cures for the diseases that might kill your own loved ones.

amen

Psalm 19.

@Tbone yes there is.

​@Tbone is that your belief?

@@mountkeen8701 oh can you give scripture with your comment please

I'll bet he had his share of ice.

Congratulations 🎉

What a great way to honor your dad! It's great to hear how proud you are of him!

COOL!!!😎👍

Thank you for... sharing? My dad was in OCS during basic training in WW2. He caught tuberculosis and got out of the invasion of Anzio, which was good for my future prospects. He never had anything named after him. Who'd a thought?

You've been had. Educate yourself on evolution and this planets actual history.

he didnt even address the topic because ......... the bible says nothing about any ice age .

​@@anniedarkhorse6791 There is no Darwinian Evolution. The history of the planet is obviously up for debate between atheists and theists, both interpreting the same evidence with a different presupposition.

​@@anyone9689The Bible references ice in Job 38:29-30. It wouldn't make sense for middle easterners to have written about the iceages from first hand knowledge because the Scandinavian ice sheets were much farther north. Only 30% of the earth is covered in ice during an iceage. 🤷‍♂️

@@jmichaelrice2 right , the bible says nothing about any ice age.

@@mountkeen8701 That percentage number is completely arbitrary. It is well documented that vast sections of DNA between the two genomes are so incredibly different that they are omitted from the results… much like someone could claim that the Empire State Building is 98% similar to the pentagon just because the same building materials (rebar, steel beams, drywall etc..) were used. All kinds of (non-creationist) studies have since about 2013 concluded that a more realistic percentage is anywhere from 40 to 80 in similarity. At that point, one could argue common design.

@@mountkeen8701 I could definitely get into that with you, but RU-vid rarely posts comments with pasted links, so I’d have to cryptically relay that info manually. Google is your friend, and if you’re honest with yourself, you’ll use it. Much of the data isn’t omitted and you’ll find evidence of that in the first page of a Google search.

@@mountkeen8701 First of all, I didn’t say that I “can’t”… I vaguely implied that it would take a long time to relay the information in such a way as to circumvent RU-vid’s silly policies. Second of all, I haven’t made any claims as to the methodology of cat DNA comparing. I haven’t a clue about cat DNA as I’ve never researched it. It’s clearly obvious to me that the chimp and human comparison was made through deceitful eyes in favor of providing evidence for evolution more than documenting facts of biology. Google the peer reviewed paper by Jeffrey P Tompkins in regards to his attempt of refutation against Answers In Genesis where therein he comes to the same conclusion that the similar DNA is between 60%-84%. That’s a good start. Or better yet, compare the graphed results yourself between PanTro4/PanTro5 and GRCh37.31 (the actual specimens used in the Human Genome Project). You can find graphs that actually account for the vast unalign-able regions of the two specimens.

​@@GioGuitarDude the Human Genome Project was led by Francis Collins, a Christian creationist. 'As someone who's had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I've had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before. It's also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming. *I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that* -- Francis Collins If you wish to learn about any science related topic, you certainly cannot trust AIG. They have a statement of faith on their website. A person cannot conduct science while adhering to some sort of statement of faith. ..Interesting that 'apologetics' is a religion thing; it does not exist in science. Science has no need for 'apologetics'. I would be embarrassed, and would feel a bit foolish, to be involved in any sort of organization, or to adhere to any sort of belief system, that would require me to utilize 'apologetics'.

@@travisbicklepopsicle I don’t use AIG articles to argue creation. And I’m not sure if testimonies from Francis are supposed to be convincing, but they’re not. I’d hate to pull a “Kent Hovind”, but let’s take a Toyota 4Runner and a Tacoma for example. They are completely different vehicles made for different things, but they share 90%+ of the same wires, sensors, drivetrain and suspension components etc… what does that prove? It proves that the same engineers designed them. You’d have to have an incredible imagination to come to any other conclusion. Francis dove into into the HGP with a background that was heavily invested in biological evolution, and that’s abundantly clear. Diving into the meat and potatoes of the results make it abundantly clear that results were omitted in favor of providing evidence for evolution. Even from a behavioral and morphological standpoint, one cannot honestly believe that we are more related to chimps than tigers are related to house cats. The differences are too obvious.

@@therick363 yes it is, its written in the bible.

@@therick363 Just for one observation - all cultures have flood legends and myths, while the Bible is the closest to a clear and concise explanation as there is.

​@@alwilson3204I love how biased you are towards your own religion.

​@@jaymielynn5426What does it being written in the bible have to do with anything?

How wonderful indeed! I sure loved watching when my mother had to watch as her own mother that had Alzheimer’s shriveled and decayed into a barely living skeleton who’d forgotten everyone she loved! Or when my Uncle got cancer and kept it secret before he got divorced with his wife! Or when he allowed the holocaust to happen. And when he allowed humanity to become “bad” just to have a reason to kill everyone. So great and kind.

I think my favorite fact in this presentation was at the end in regards to the Behemoth. I'm sure I've heard of it before and have read the passage many times (I'm 60 and with the exception of a relative few rebellious years during my teens, I've striven to live for Christ since I was about 8) but the way he covered it even briefly here explaining the Biblical description was pretty awesome!

Answer this? where in bible was the first humans made no its not Eden You should read the bible and not cherry pick.

@@ashwayn and I presume that you can tell me all about that right? Open the book and explain all that you are dying type out… because we hadn’t even said anything about that but fine, go ahead and spit it out for us to read.

@@ashwayn If I look into your bio and see preferred pronouns the argument is officially over for you

@@petraonenomatter6944 praise be to GOD brother, I’m a little behind you with regards to age but right there with you in the discussions regarding creation. I can’t wait to go for a trip to the ark museum in Kentucky. A coworker went a year or two ago and told me all about it and I’ve wanted to take my kids ever since.

Walt Disney have been making these sort of stories for years now

@@Inmate533 So did Jesus.

@@ngc-fo5te Praise God! Yes He did!

​@@truthgiver8286 cheap copycats maybe. LOL

​@@ngc-fo5te Walt didn't rise again

@Humanbeing.whatelse amen!

Yes indeed Amen and Amen

If you look at the Hebrew word used in this verse, it's completely different from that used in Genesis 1:24, where a biblical 'kind' is defined. Genesis uses the word 'laminah', whereas Leviticus uses 'kilayim'. You can confirm these using an interlinear Bible if you like. It's a very easy mistake to make, if you only read the English version. Hope this helps!

​@@wadewatts1784Thanks, i will look into it.

Evolution isn’t based on faith, it’s based on evidence of which there is a massive amount. Creation is based on belief with no evidence.

Evolution is based on evidence for which there is a massive amount, not faith. Creation is based on belief with no evidence.

Not faith, but stupidity to believe in evolution!!

@@mountkeen8701 What? Ancient Egyptians didn't exist when the Flood happened. The Flood happened around 3250 BC. Ancient Egypt was formed later.

@@mountkeen8701 peer reviewed articles? Anything that disagrees with the Bible pretty much has to assume first that there is no God. Those rack layers are all pretty much sedimentary, which means sand/dirt layers, and their uniformity indicates a quick settling, trapping both living and dead creatures, and then a different weight of sedimentation over that, and each being compacted in turn. If geologic eons were involved, the sedimentation should not be so sweetly layered as it is, but rather a fairly even mix of soil types without the obvious layers. The folds explained by a sedimentary layer, already forming as a mud layer, being moved by a strong surge of water in the opposing direction, before being compressed by the layers above. Since the folds were thick mud when made, not yet rock, we get the clean folds instead of shattered rock.

@@mountkeen8701 Really what....?? The Flood happened in around 3250 BC according to the Bible. There is no contradiction between the Bible and the existence of ancient Egyptians. You were asking an ignorant question about how ancient Egyptians survived the Flood, I gave you a clear answer that THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO SURVIVE THE FLOOD. THERE WAS NO FLOOD WHEN ANCIENT EGYPTIANS LIVED. Do you really need peer reviewed articles to prove it to you? Hmm... Also looks like you were talking to someone else after your first comment, thinking you were talking to me :)))

@@galaxyrider9599 No it didn’t. There is no exact date for the flood. Some of y’all claim it was 5000 Bc, some 3000bc, some 2000 BC. You’ve got as well-defined of a timeline of earths history as flat earthers do

. 😅😅😅 0:01

And how would you respond to the Bible saying that animals were made after their own kind

Amen

@@SK-bw2cv And Amen.

​​@@holidayrap ​ And amen

And the name of God is YEHOVAH (Jehovah in English) and Jesus said that THIS name should be sanctified... held Holy. Jesus made it known and so did his disciples. Jesus said that Jehovah is THE ONLY TRUE GOD... John 17:3, 6, 26, John 4:23, John 20:17, 1Corinthians 15:24-28. Zephaniah 2:3 "Seek Jehovah ALL you meek ones of the earth.. Probably you may be concealed in the day of His anger." JWs.

Amen and Amen

@@mountkeen8701 Do you really want to hear it or are you just too busy running away from your Maker? You obviously didn't watch the clip.......as two of your questions are answered in it! Not very bright, but I admire your seal!

@@mountkeen8701 thanks for proving my point! your "2 makers" had their 2 makers......you can only take that back so far, so when you get to the end of that genealogy, Who made them? No thing can come from nothing, so who made them?

@@mountkeen8701 Creating galaxies that are far off......the light was also created (if you dare to read), so There was Light. all you want to do is argue about covering up your fears.......go hide under your bed as your pretext crumbles in front of your eyes.

@@mountkeen8701 you need to realize I’m not engaging with your nonsense. The point is God, The Creator….go whine elsewhere as THAT’S what you’re running from.

@@jimdwyer135 No thing can come from nothing, but where did god come from then? Your questions that “disprove” evolution can be just as easily aimed at god. In both cases: we don’t know.

Not much of that here, I'm afraid.

@@razark9 God the creator, said "let US", also lets you be carnal a fleshly rewarded. Enjoy works of your power till you can't breathe, bye, go to sleep 4all time. But those with new bodies sa" how long oh Lord holy and TRUE", 😂😂😂😂😂

You know, that every word about God was written by "man"?

@@yourguard4 Gods words written by man. You will say this is a contradiction. Say what you will. You will be resurrected and stand before him one day.

@@xX0IRIDIUM0Xx Until now, everyone has left his legs behind in this world, so "standing" is a wild claim. And because all my senses, personalitie and memories are gone with my brain, I don't care what Gods plan is with the rest. But lets assume, it is similar to how you imagine it. But then it turns out, that the bible was just storyies written by man, and you failed the test of the real God.

@@yourguard4 You assume we are superstitious or gullible. We go against the grain swimming upstream because we KNOW the truth.

People won't get the sarcasm on here.

@@ngc-fo5te Not offering sarcasm, dude. They did a great job.

@@amel2784 Of course it was sarcasm. You can't actually be serious.

@@ngc-fo5te aren't you the funny one? That was an excellent presentation. But I'm sure you are such an excellent communicator that you've got lots of critiques you can offer him. I'm also sure speakers on YT wait around and tremble at what criticism you might level at them. Make like a leaf, why don't ya? I don't give a rip what sarcasm or humor you use. Doesn't faze me a bit.

@@amel2784 You're definitely trolling.

You've been had.

I’m pretty sure at least 9 of the 10 people who gave this a thumbs up didn’t realize it’s satire.

@@jordanhenshaw lol agreed. Pretty sure that entire comment was a joke. But not entirely sure. Edit: just realized you replied to your own comment 😂

​@@jordanhenshaw I knew it was and I loved it. My favorite part is how the video could have been a RU-vid short by saying the Bible doesn't talk about an ice age.

I remember Ken Hamm coming to my church with AIG, I bought the whole package in the early 2000's. I was in College wanting to teach Middle School when I graduated. Instead I became a ECE teacher. Anyway I feel like this Speaker and Mr.Hamm are fast talkers, like one person said used car salesmen. Do they talk so fast because they think they might forget something or they are excited about what they are saying?

@@kimbrown419 Probably talks fast to squeeze every bit of information in within the allotted time given. Just a guess on my part but having done some public speaking (aka preaching) with a preset amount of time I can empathize with that thought. Though I'm not as 'gifted' a public speaker as this man clearly is. I never once got lost following his Segways into the next topic on his agenda to speak about. IMO, a gifted and talented speaker indeed!

@@petraonenomatter6944 My same thoughts. A limited amount of time to convey a small portion of a large body of relevant information. I found no fault with his presentation approach. As to his "fast" talking, there is no way to judge this without hearing him talk about the weather, what he had for supper and/or hearing him talk about mowing his lawn, last Saturday. i.e. hearing his normal delivery when not under pressure to deliver a limited time presentation.

To me he is very excited to share his info in limited time. Someone usually says that I have verbal diarrhea 😂 whenever I have something interesting to share to friends and visitors.

@@tooltime9260 exactly I totally agree with you!

@@mountkeen8701 I've been studying these subjects for over 50 years. Try paying very close attention to 'explanations' like the origins of the solar system, IF, indeed, you have truly read their writings for yourself. Periodically, while they attempt to talk over the average person's head, they will actually state, 'the cause of this and that is unknown', or 'there is no mutual agreement between scientists on this subject, while some theorize....but there are serious problems with those viewpoints', etc. It is amazing how Creationism has many answers that simply puzzle atheist scientists who have a fair number of charlatans in their midst. Open your closed little mind. Often, only the Holy Spirit can help you with that.

​@@mountkeen8701first what your best proof of evolution? Second show me the mechanism that can change one animal into another. What proof do you have of this? I bet none your a gullible moron that hasn't been able to see science doesn't have all the answers it's not perfect and evidence is truly being interpreted way wrong in evolution. It's fake it doesn't work and many secular scientists will even disagree with evolutionary theory. So yeah you may want to grow up there kido your the one that's wrong

@@mountkeen8701 I know the truth and the truth has set me free. Science has its place. No denying that. Technology and scientific development is all good. When it comes to evolution and age of the world that is not real science. We can agree to disagree. I don’t mind being criticized or called a Luddite. God has the final word in the end.

​@@Ann-rf8fiAnd how did you come to the conclusion that evaluation isn't real or didn't occur? This isn't a agree to disagree conversation you made a bold claim and you should be able to back it up.

@@alwilson3204 Creationism ascribes supernatural explanations to phenomena that can easily be naturalistically explained, and that too with no evidence. How exactly does that hold ground?

All false

Also, the land was all connected at one time.

I think humans had very advanced technology in ancient times.The Bible never gives a date as to when the Flood happened.Yes,we know there was A flood at the end of the ice age,but that does not prove that that was the same Flood told of in the Bible.Obviously it was not a high-tech world at the end of the ice age that we know about,but millenia before that ther could have been advanced technology.God supposedly destroyed the world because of mankind's sinfulness.What kind of sin could virtually every human on the planet have been committing if they were all living in huts and spending every minute in activities(farming,hunting,etc.)needed to simply sustain life in a primitive agricultural civilization as we know existed 10-12,000 years ago?But I can see a civilization very similar to ours,with too much idleness and ease,succumbing this way.

Retarded.... The word you were looking for is "retarded".

@sqearly ok fair enough. Formerly a monument, and a national park since 2019, apparently. but it is definitely in New Mexico.

This channel is no stranger to making things up.

@@mehallica666 neither was Darwin, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Galton, Rousseau, Dewey, Hume, Rand, Sanger, Spock, Russell, etc, etc, etc

I once calculated tat the ocean level must have been lower tan now by 37 meters at one point, after studying one cave photograph, with had cave paintings, but may be I am mistaken.

According to the Bible only 15% of the earth was water. A complete reversal of current conditions. Something to contemplate

There are no and were no land bridges to australia the sea floor has been mapped around australia

…don’t forget the Bering Strait.

@@Phelox that doesnt go to Australia

You've been had.

If you’re 5 years old.

Not if you start with the conclusion you'd already chosen and work backwards to make the facts fit. But that's not a scientific approach.

​@@joshuakohlmann9731Exactly what evolutionists do. They neatly often only allow that which supports their suppositions. It's a house of cards built on preselected suppositions. Anyone with the truth is black balled, no matter their evidence.

​@razark9 What has been dismissed in this video concerning the subject matter? I wonder if all you knee-jerk criticisers even listen in any real way to the videos you come to spew mainly unfounded insults at.

@@joshuakohlmann9731 science is assumptions proven wrong all the tome

Could you do that for us please?

Macro evolution hasn’t been observed because it’s not real, it’s a term that creationists use to justify genetic diversity after the flood without actually having to fully understand and believe those very same scientific principles that explain both “types” of evolution

And as for counter examples and alternate explanation: there’s literally dozens of conflicting theories that are talked about to this day. Spinosaurus, Dark matter, String theory, Quantum Gravity, normal Gravity, first life forms, A lot of stuff is still very much in debate, but evolution is probably one of the most well documented scientific theories alongside cell theory and gravity.

They don´t care about species, they only know "kinds".

Me too. I love cheetahs and it's sad that has happened.