Evolutionists Have Fooled MILLIONS About This 

Those that go astray after a lie?

Blessed are those that repent and ask for forgiveness after making mistake.

So do I trust the written word of God (with myriad interpretations), or God's word written so clearly in Geology and Astronomy...

Dinosaurs hatch. Eggs could have been on the ark

@@spikenomoon Which Bible verse mentions this?

Because it is physically impossible for a squid to lift its tentacles out of water onto a boat to drag it down.

@@mountkeen8701 stories throughout histories have been embellished, however, “monsters” have always existed, to people who had no previous knowledge or education of said creatures. If you were a new young sailor who didn’t know science, and suddenly a giant salt water crocodile came after you, would you not think it was a monster?

@@mountkeen8701 biblical events may have happened, but perhaps embellished or misinterpreted over thousands of years. Remember that old “telephone” game.

@@mountkeen8701 it means that uneducated people have always tried to make explanations of things that they could not understand. You are trying to argue from a point that you believe I am religious, which is not true. I am agnostic.

@@mountkeen8701 my original claims is that some anomalies that exist, and events that happened have been described throughout history by people whom may have been perceiving from a point of view that was uneducated in science. Also misinterpretation is always a huge factor. Science has proved that “monsters” exist, they aren’t “monsters”, once we have labeled them with a scientific name. A shark is not a “monster” to the educated, however, to the uneducated, it really kind of is a “monster”. Evidence exists that great floods did occur, this is a scientific fact, this does not mean it was an act of Poseidon. The parting of the Red Sea could have just been a shift in the tides.

Hay manera de ver esa foto? Ya sea por tu cuenta personal o alguna pagina oficial? Esteria encantado de verla para compartirla con mis amigos

@@jarsa4099 unfortunately no. The photo belongs to the German geologist, and although I have it. I have no right to distribute it. But a typical tyrannosaurus type dino is depicted with a thick, long, but not tapering snout, standing on powerful hind limbs, with small upper limbs and a massive tail. Actually I never seen such convincing image of a dino. And its antiquity is beyond doubt. There are many other petroglyphs on that 3000m+ mount

Soooo one of those inhave proof but you cant see it situations..

@@sox8278 why cannot see? Fly here and I'll show you the photo. Alternatively, go to that mount full of petroglyphs and you will see the original

Sure you book the tickets and accommodation and then il be more then prepared to not only eat my words but proclaim your evidence.

No she didn’t say that

I taught for 30 years n never ever said that

@@antoniovela4125 I don't recall having you as a teacher

Never said I was…just a response 🤦🏻‍♂️

@antoniovela4125 that cool I saw that most bullies in school were teachers

Amen

Amen 🙂✝️🙏

He never changes! Amen. Our God is an amazing God

Someone told me He is going to be different when He returns. He is going to be like a lion and slaughter lots of people. There is a giant wine press in Revelation and all the bad people get their blood and guts squished out.

Yes. A figment of Man's imagination.

Amen

Nah

Trust in God and you, too can wear a belt buckle that says "God with us" as you join in a slaughter that killed 50 million people known as WWII and the best part is you never questioned anything until it was too late! So go on down that road that preaches that the bible is perfect and makes no mistakes even as it teaches the science (knowledge) that was all that was known over 4,000 years ago and with no changes allowed since then!

He not only makes paths straight, but Jesus also mows my lawn every Saturday.

I bvvi vrgfxfy

They only hire liars, so if you are good with lying you might have a shot. They don't care about your specific credentials, just that you will pitch their nonsense with an air of authority given your credentials.

jadabrown ***oh !!! yes you are a "mechanical engineer" , most likely you will never drive an electric automobile.***

@@adelinomorte7421You do realize mechanical engineers actually make those electric vehicles, right?

I would say stay in technical engineering, something Bodie Hodge should have done as well...

The same time they started discovering all the Dinos 😂

My favorite quote from god is:

​@@--..-...-..-.--....I AM.... that's my favorite quote, best part is anybody who says the same is just as questionable being real as people who question if God is real.

I don’t know what illustration your referring to, but if there were ankylosaurs alive less than 600 years ago. We would have substantially more record to them existing than just one illustration. I’d imagine you’ve misidentified it from a mythical creature or a weird drawing of a current animal

@@tone9358 She said it was an illustration. she did not claim it was real.

Photo or it didn’t happen

Ankys are herbivores tho

​@@Woopormaybe he clubbed it because it was eating too much of the the sheep's food or bothering his sheep.

Yup. But there aren't. We certainly have evidenc eof fossilised *mammals* that co-existed with dinosaurs. But no modern mammals. At all.

Maybe man didn't spread out across the whole world but stayed in relatively the same places. Then man would not be found amongst dinos. The bible is very vague when it comes to certain specifics. One thing it does say is that mankind did not spread out across the world after the flood, contrary to God's command.

Yes, that is assuming that man spread across the whole world in only 1000 years(and starting from only 1 couple). But the places where dinosaur fossils are usually found are often far from where the "preflood" people probably lived.

@@xMCxVSxARBITERx _Maybe man didn't spread out across the whole world but stayed in relatively the same places_ Except we know that humans DON'T. Humans are an expansionaist species. _The bible is very vague when it comes to certain specifics_ That's because the bible is a collection of made-up stories written by bronze age desert tribesmen.

@@shaunmeyer8822 _But the places where dinosaur fossils are usually found are often far from where the "preflood" people probably lived_ Dinosaur fossils are found all over the world. Moreover, this wouldn;t explain why there are NO modern animals mixed in with dinosaurs. You are conveniently assuming that all humans and ALL modern animals all stayed in one place that no dinosaur ever went whlst they spread everywhere else? lol

I like the comic of a young t-Rex in school. Who’s mad he never gets called to answer a question, because his arms are to short for the teacher to see.

Imagine T-Rex brushing his teeth...

I laughed way harder at this than I should have. 😂

​@@dustencross357 Imagine a t-rex doing push ups

@@timothyelposar2571 imagine two T-Rex trying to do a high five

Wym?

Psalm 118:8. It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man.

What about What Harry Potter said??? I know for a fact that Harry Potter is real because I have all the books.😂

@@user-pf3zw5sl8o . `

@@user-pf3zw5sl8o it is better to trust math than the wandering mind...

@@Legend-mg2ry Why yes it is!

If anything, god is way more far fetched than dinosaurs. We have found thousands of fossils detailing hundreds of species. The Bible does not substitute them.

Well said

Just like wicked book learning, and evil maths , and profound thought that doesn't include Bible studies. Using what God gave us is a sin.

This is the education system of the future

Im here due to the reconmended system

Your prolific use of grammar is proof thereof.

Just look at the channels this guy is subscribed to and you notice, hes a huge materialist.

Amen!

If this bunch of uneducated losers is all he has ...

@@eudyptes5046what,you?

@@ji8044 Brodie is paid to ignore data that doesn't fit the YEC narrative.

@@ji8044 DNA code doesn’t change codes to cause anything to evolve

@@ji8044 you don’t understand DNA. Your evolutionist teachers failed to tell you that no DNA in this planet can evolve to a new DNA code. Or has it ever been observed to change into a new DNA code to cause a fish to grow legs. The information is not there. In the human race all you will get is humans probably, lighter, darker, short, tall, slanted eyes, small eyes, but the DNA code will never evolve or add new information to cause a human to change into a monkey. The information is not there and it was never there. You’ve been lied to, that’s why you’re on this Christian creation channel because you don’t even believe your own theory of evolution so you’re looking for answers

@@baileypanamaWhat does that have to do with what he just pointed out? Unrelated.

@@Insultedyeti712 pointed out? But can you refute what I said? The answer is no. You will never be able to add information to any genome to cause any creature on this earth to grow a totally new limb 🦵. You, billions, trillions of years, scientist can never write the codes, y’all don’t have that power or intelligence and never will. Time cannot bring organism to life from the dead. Evolution is dead it’s been dead. People like you hold on to it because it’s your religion. To believe non life came to life from the dead.

By Mass-energy equivalence

Exactly, they don't admit to have a belief based on faith.

It's very easy to get disgruntled when trying to explain the evidence for something when the person you're explaining it to has already made up their mind that they will only believe things by faith...

Except traditionally speaking theories are facts. The bible on the hand demands you believe in it and not question it or be punished.

@@daniellarkins3849 Lol, believing a magical bacteria appear from nowhere, inject time, bacteria builds computers and lands on the moon?? Sounds legit............!?

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

@@lucbos7516 guess you never noticed I said I was a non-believer you dimwitted amoeba. Also it’s “and”…not “end”….come on, man…

@@lucbos7516 if God is not real why waste your time talking about him?

@@gohan3448 Grow up and stop believing in fairy tales The earth is 5 billion years old and the universe 13,7 billion years old

@@gohan3448 How do we know that this point in time is exactly 4.54 billion years in the past? The most important tool for dating things is the half-life of radioactive atoms. Every radioactive atom has a so-called half-life. That is the time, when there is exactly a 50% chance that it fell apart. Quantum mechanically, it is impossible to predict exactly when an atom will spontaneously fall apart. We can only say something about the probability of an atom falling apart. Fortunately for these measurements, there are a lot of atoms. The time when 50% of, say, a billion atoms have fallen apart, is precisely known, by the law of large numbers. There are atom types that have half-lives of hundreds of millions of years or more. Well-known examples are uranium-235, uranium-238 and thorium-232 (the number after the element name indicates the number of particles in the atomic nucleus). Radioactive decay occurs in only a few well-known ways. For example, an atom can emit an alpha particle, i.e. a helium nucleus: the atomic number then drops by two and there are two neutrons and two protons less in the remaining nucleus. Beta decay is also common: an atomic nucleus then ejects an electron and thereby moves up one place in the periodic table. A well-known series of decay reactions is that of uranium-238 in lead-206. Crystals of a pure uranium-containing mineral naturally contain no lead, because lead behaves chemically very differently from uranium. The more lead there is, the older the mineral must be. The amount of lead in uranium-containing meteorites relative to the amount of uranium is so high that they have been dated to be around 4.54 billion years old. Meteorites have formed in the protoplanetary disk. Therefore, we know that this disk existed around 4.54 billion years ago and so the Earth must be slightly younger than this date. The oldest known minerals on Earth, zirconium crystals from the Jack Hills of Australia, and where these measurements were taken, were not much younger, at around 4.4 billion years old. Hence we can say with great certainty that the earth is between 4.5 and 4.6 billion years old.

If you are going to pray for anything please pray for these people to stop lying to you.

Good man....open with a joke 🤣🤣🤣

"Jesus open their eyes" Your eyes have to be well shut to buy into a justice by proxy scam that clearly failed even in your own fables.

No one except fundamentalists Christians watch these videos. Most Americans who believe in god also believe in some form of evolution including myself.

@@daniellarkins3849 Unfortunately these fundamentalists are politically loud and active, working to change the science curriculum of the educational system. If they can't get their garbage into the science text books they want the real science flagged as 'just one of many theories' to make it easier for them to recruit those kids into their fundamentalist ignorance later. Edit: They also tend to have a lot of overlap with hate preachers/groups, like Kent Hovind, Matt Powell, Grayson Fritts, and Steven Anderson.

@@ji8044 Go back and add up the ages.

@@BionAvastar3000 Abraham and Noah were both fictional characters. Noah was a character invented based on the story "The Epic of Gilgamesh" while Abraham was invented to be the founder of the newly forming hebrew culture. They were fast and loose with the facts back then.

@@BionAvastar3000 How does adding up the ages prove that they were real?

@@billyb7465 You said it was untrue that Noah was living during Abraham's times. If you go back and add the ages, it works out that they did live contemporaneously

@@avi8r66 No the epic of gilgamesh is a corruption of the true Noah account. For thousands of continuous years, we knew about the noah account from the bible, and only recently rediscovered the gilgamesh version.

Hi, I’m a biologist. What aspects do you say fooled you? When I watch creationist videos this I see terrible misrepresentation of the science, even deliberately wrong. Sadly this then misleads people with little science background.

Yeah they do that. They brainwash you with everything from a young age.

I love dinos too, but it has NEVER changed my view of the Bible, and I love science also!!!

@@sjl197 I find it so interesting that evolutionist use the word science to make it seem like there assumption is fact in reality science is a testing of assumptions to see if they are factual .. You can not do that so therefore it's not science! It's a theory! Yet Biblical information has been proven to be fact historically. One being the life and death and reresection of Jesus Historically proven.

@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice Hi. Well, evolutionary biology is a subset of biology, which is a subset of science. This is as much of a fact, and moreso that much of what you then claim to be factual. That said, let's perhaps shift first to where we can perhaps agree. I also think the bible contains much which can be seen as historical facts, especially in the new testament. Here, i mean many reported aspects that tie against (and hence supported by) other external evidence which independently is inline with same narrative like archeology, or less securely by other stated accounts, most notably those written by other authors. However, i would take pause to say that much said about the life of Jesus really does not seem to me as secure as you seem to favour. I would strongly disagree about your statement on the resurection as 'historically proven' - it absolutely is not proven. Firstly, the claim of resurrection after death is of course counter to (almost) any such event in humanity history - or even that of any animal. The idea of Jesus' resurrection is an extraordinary claim, which of course makes it so remarkable to Christians. However, it is not the only claimed case, as similar extrordinary claims exist for supposed resurrection for Osiris in Egypt, Tammuz in Mesopotamia, Quetzalcóatl in Mexico, etc. If stick to bible though, I find it amazing how easily forgotton Lazarus of Bethany became, even though he too was said to be resurrected. Anyway, to focus back on the beloved Jesus, what there is are essentially four different accounts, seemingly written many years later by people who were not directly involved in the events. Add in some scholars favor that the account of Matthew seems to largely adapted from Mark possibly earlier account, hence lacks independance. There's also a rather indirect statement by Paul to the Corinthians, that you might want to treat as eye-witness. Even if the accounts are independendant, each vary in several aspects of the narrative, which a modern court case in the western world would rightly treat with skeptisim and caution if such differing accounts were presented as evidence. So, i'm really not sure how you can jump from what's said in those differing (and possibly non-independant) accounts, mostly written long after the event, to somehow 'historically proven'. i really cannot fathom how you seem willing to gladly accept those as 'true' or in your words ‘proven’, yet seem so willing to dismiss evolution (or rather evolutionary biology) as unfounded? It partly seems you've partly misunderstood the scientific word theory is, if so let’s first address that. A theory in scientific terminology has been explained multiple times as a "well-substantiated explanation", "based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed", a concept which differs strongly from the common usage of 'theory' as more akin to a premise or a hypothesis. How we define science is more tricky, but your idea of 'testing assumptions' can be part of core concept of falsifiability. That's only one facet of science, but if using that then i would strongly disagree with you there too - much of evolutionary biology including all the core concepts have been subject to 'testing' in many various ways, and the concepts remain robust to the continued addition of new evidence from multiple sources. Your beloved "historically proven" resurrection is in essence five cases of testimony, only one as eyewitness. Modern psychology has repeatedly shown how unreliable eye witnesses can be due to failure of memory, bias, and even willful embelishment. Yet worse, four of your five sources are several years after the alledged event, at best interpreting word of mouth hearsay. So please, let's hear how you say any of that is 'historically proven'.

Believe in God or not this comment is factual info. these people are discrediting their beliefs by being so ignorant and its sad.

It looked more like the Lock Ness monster that people have taken pictures of.

Yes, changes in dog breeds are a good example of evolution.

@@jockyoung4491 not so. Dog breeds are an example of natural and artificial selection, NOT evolution. Evolution posits that somewhere back in Lyell's famously extremist "deep time ", a strange form of ancestor produced celery seeds and also produced puppies. No matter how many billions of years you want, there is still ZERO chance of inert matter "coming alive ", like in the cartoons you were watching while you should have been reading your Bible, and there is ZERO chance of celery having puppies.

Genesis says the earth is a flat disc with a dome over it covered in an expanse of water. It was clearly written people who didn't know anything about the world

And given enough time, if bred separately, they will lose the ability to interbreed and be two different species. Wow, evolution makes sense when you stop reading the Bible.

Let me get this straight.. You ACKNOWLEDGE that the big bang is incorrect and that evolution is blatant lies yet for "reasons" you do believe that a big bang created a giant spinning spherical water world space ball spinning faster than a BULLET at the EQUATOR when the Bible states the earth is firm and IMMOVABLE!!

That's one word for it.

No

I thought you tend to trap your superior farts in a bottle and get high off of sniffing it. The level of cringe that you atheist, cuck virgins exhibit has become nauseating

Fred, I know what you mean. When speakers talk slowly, it gives the audience more time to reflect and think critically. If the presenter had allowed time for a Q&A session at the end, I wonder if that would have ruined his presentation.

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

@@lucbos7516 the ‘fool’ hath said in his heart there is no God.

@@lucbos7516 you will stand before Him as your prosecutor and judge.

Yes, I prefer speakers who speak steadily and rapid pace. Otherwise my mind wanders and I will stop watching.

Because that's when they lived. But if you are asking creationists, they would simply deny everything.

I think the time scale they have is wrong. The method they use for dating how old something should be according to its depth is inaccurate.

@@jockyoung4491 thank you for taking the time to respond. I am a creationist and I believe the scientific evidence points to design rather than an unguided process of macro-evolution. I believe there was a universal flood and that geological evidence world wide points to this as well. I believe the radioactive dating system has some flawed assumptions (as TheArctursProject in the earlier reply mentions). However, I have not yet heard a good explanation for the ordering of the fossils in the different strata (from either evolutionists or creationists).

@@TheArcturusProject thank you for taking the time to respond. My question is not about the dating methods used for the different strata in the geological column, but the ordering of fossils. Why do all dinosaurs show up in these strata after amphibians and before mammals? I believe the Noachian flood took place as recorded in the Bible, but I have not heard a good explanation yet as to why we see the ordering of the fossils that we do.

​​​what evidence you have to put forward to prove your creationsam? In flood all animals perished including blue whales and turtles? 😂😂😂

You are wrong! It becomes "Christian" science. 🤣

​@@JB-yb4wnit becomes real science

Evolution is not science. Evolution is a religion Science is science

The word Dinosaur wasn't invented until 1841. How could they talk about them. However, dragon was a word that had been in use. So it what was used.

The word dinosaur wasn't created until 1841 dragon was the only word they knew to describe what they say! Research and learn history before you comment

ancient societies discovered fossils and made up stories about them because they look like fantastic animals. the idea that dinosaur fossils are a recent discovery is totally false. it is just that no one understood what they are.

​@@nickmeschke2474, good response Nick! Couldn't have said it better myself.

😂 So on the basis that because people drew dragons=dragons existed, does that mean unicorns, elfs, fairies, minotaurs, all the God's of mythologies, etc... existed, too ?

how about the Yeti, if the loch ness monster is a dinosaur then Yeti is a pre-human species, right?

That was until the people responsible for the Surgeon's photograph admitted they used a toy submarine and a fake head.

Can we put poor Nessie out of his misery? It’s been proven the best photo was a hoax by a physician 👨‍⚕️ and 2 friends with a rubber glove and a child’s toy submarine! Plus the structure of the lock makes a critter his size IMPOSSIBLE to inhabit What about the NEPHILIM buried in my birth area southwestern OHIO Worshipped by native Americans? Does anyone who believes as I DO that Lucifer and 1/3 of the lesser Angels cast out in the failed attempt to destroy GOD were “good buddies” in the relative garbage heap Lucifer led them into? Ever consider they fought for destroying loyal humans - and tribes via caves still worship 15 feet PLUS tall entombed hominid creatures that I have been two in Adam’s county OHIO I am telling the truth Let the reader UNDERSTAND In Jesus’ NAME AMEN

@@haggismcbaggis9485 But... the story already existed before that. How did the people who made the story come up with the story? Humans can't make stories of things they don't know. So in order to come up with the idea of a dino in a lake, someone must've known what a dino was in a time where there supposedly were none.

@@timspiker The story originated in the 6th to 7th century from an embellished account of St. Columba saving 2 men from an aquatic monster, even raising one of them from the dead. The plesiosaur is likely a modern interpretation. Yes, ancient people had ideas about sea monsters.

Which is why these creationists make up nonsense about dinosaurs being on the ark.

@@sjl197they know that dinosaurs are a really interesting and diverse scientific topic that all ages love and decide to try as hard as possible to squeeze it into religion however they can

It ended with him saying "just joking I made it all up god doesn't exist"

Please explain how God made Eve from a rib, how Jesus turned water to wine and walked on water, continental drift and the creation of the Himalayan mountains, radioactive decay, I could go on and on. The Bible is so blatantly wrong on so many things. As an electrical engineer you should know all of your knowledge has been gained from human discovery through the scientific method.

@@gtrdoc911 They're miracles lol that's one of God's shticks considering he's omnipotent

@@gtrdoc911 Genesis took the “made Eve from a Rib” from an older Sumerian creation story where Enki ate a forbidden fruit and got sick, and the earth mother goddess made a female goddess Ninti from his rib, to nurse and care for him… prior to him eating this fruit there was no sickness or death in the paradise land of Dilmun (basically Eden)…. the Sumerian tablets including this story are at least several hundred if not over a millennium older than any of the original source documents that the Bible was formed from during its composition/editing.

@@iLLEly0n thanks for that story. Basically Judeo-Christian Holy tales are obviously man made literature adapted from older tales. Hard to believe in 2024 some people take that info as fact.

serpent snake is a GODDESS symbol and in the second human creation myth in bible?? O yes Eden was second first was on 6th day and its pleural GODS inc a Goddess you should read the bible

@@ashwayn I'm perfectly capable of using various Biblical lexicons that explain the meanings of words. "serpent" in Genesis referring to the fallen one is a descriptive title, with roots in a "burning" as poison burns, or hot, glowing metal, as the appearance of the cherubim and seraphim seen that appeared to be glowing like hot brass.

What is the root of nachash. Same?

@@joshuajoshua7257 Using Strong's, you can trace the roots for a better idea. There were also people who were named similar. Perhaps they were like "Cartwright" or "Smith", with roots in brass / copper forging 😁. I can copy / paste the entries later. They need cleaning up for the proper paste formatting.

@@joshuajoshua7257 From the top: "serpent" in Genesis 3.1 - h5175. נָחָשׁ nâḥâš; from 5172; a snake (from its hiss): - serpent. AV (31) - serpent 31; 1. serpent, snake A. serpent B. image (of serpent) C. fleeing serpent (mythological)

Darwinist Evolutionist fairytales have no credibility whatsoever, and they already have Paleolithic bone experts and research data from the RATE group in 1999, which again prove the Creationist Truth.

He's mostly preaching to the choir, and you're not in it. "He who has ears to hear, let him hear."

One of the subtle things I see pushed more and more is that there was a huge gap in Genesis creation where there were millions of years injected into the time of creation. And of course the Bible is ' wrong '.

@@michaelszczys8316 The bible is neither right or wrong, but rather a logically predictable way for priests to try to explain the world to pre-scientific peasants.

I think the must subtle thing is how people think they interpret Genesis literally, yet they use science to altar their interpretation. How many people take the firmament literally?

@@beliefbite Think you created a new verb there. To "altar" is maybe when a priest goes up to the altar to lie about science to his congregation? You meant alter, but I think your word is much better.

@@beliefbite Biblical fundamentalists only reject the tiny part of science that contradicts the bible story, while adopting willy-nilly all the other products of science they like. I always asked my right-wing students WSUVWJD? Which SUV would jesus drive? They stuttered in confusion. Their brainwashing does not allow for contradictory thought.

Except that they obviously are there.

As well as other transitionals

Everyone talks about missing fossils but fail to identify precisely what they think is missing.

Yes, what would a half dinosaur/half bird look like? Caudipteryx perhaps?

Wym? birds are dinos

Technically Chimaeras are real, they're a ancient group of Shark-like fish known as Ratfishes. I know that's not what you were going for but I thought I'd bring it up anyway.

Like Shiva in Hindu religion or Ra or Anubis in Egyptian. Have Jesus and Mohammad have something in common with the gods above?

@@hylaherping9180 Chimeras not chimaeras. A chimera is a mammalian mythical animal with multiple animal heads and stuff

Whoa. That is a great theory! And so obvious when you look at them. I am going to remember that when I look for dinosaurs.

I am going to tell Anne Elk that you stole her theory lol

Peruvian Ica Burial Stones depict dinosaurs interacting with man as do Mexican Acambaro Figurines. In Glen Rose Texas a riverbed bottom was exposed after a storm and was found to contain a strata that included dinosaur and human footprints walking parallel to each other. One of the human footprints actually walked thorough the dinosaur footprint leaving a combination human a dinosaur footprint. When scientists were challenged by this fact...they said obviously there was a previous unknown dinosaur which had human feet....LOL.

You are correct, there were no cameras available 66,000,000 million years ago.

@@alantasman8273 Nothing you said was correct. Just wanted you to know that. If you want to prove me wrong I will need citations to follow up on. A lot of bad art from prehistoric times has been claimed as depicting dinosaurs, but it's always not what they claim, always. As for the glen rose riverbed prints, I have never seen anything where a scientist, an honest one not a creationist 'scientist' say something like 'there was a previous unknown dinosaur which had human feet'. The prints that seem human are a variety of things, depends on which specific impression you point to, but for the most part they are modified and/or eroded dinosaur prints, modified by creationists back in the 1930s to hype the 'find' and bolster their claims of humans and dinos living together. This game of faking evidence is not new in the creationist arena. Not unique to them, but very prevalent.

@@avi8r66 The Flinstones say otherwise.

@@JB-yb4wn That there is some rock solid evidences BamBam.

What's ridiculous about them?

He does not understand paleontology

@@ov3rload333 Everything.

It wouldn't matter what they did because you aren't their creator to determine what warranted them being cursed.

We observe the evidence that evolution happens. Macro-evolution is obviously too slow to "watch". I think I understand what Dawkins was trying to say, but most scientists would consider that exact statement incorrect. We have watched evolution happen over many generations in both laboratory and wild settings.

If by "evolution" you mean "adaptation", I would be fine by that. God clearly created his creation with this ability, having imparted his wisdom into his creation. My problem with Darwinian evolution, is that to me, it requires great "faith" to believe it, since as you said, it is too "slow" for it to even be observed, from "amoeba to man".. But how do you know that evolution is "slow"? Why can't it be TODAY when that ape all of a sudden begins to walk upright? Since the "process" is ONGOING? After supposed BILLIONS of years, shouldn't we be WITNESSING "macro-evolution" this very day? It's almost as if the "process" has a mind of its own..

That's not the only lie. You need to revise everything you've been told. Remember what's written on Werner von Braun's headstone.

​@LordMathious I disagree friend. All of the so called "experiments" performed in CONTROLLED environments to me only prove "adaptation", as bacteria still remains to be bacteria, it doesn't all of a sudden becomes something else.

​@@sterlingfallsproductions3930I understand friend, but it sounds a lot like a "trial and error" process, one "error" and the organism is DEAD.. its "evolution" over, finished, kaput.. And I am thinking about it brother.. if Darwinian evolution were true, we SHOULD be witnessing Macro-evolution this very day, occurring in multiple organisms.

Man, is he old!

@@kevinrtres I meant the Mormons: hasn't Bodie deconverted to Young Earth Creationism because they're more progressive?

@@ClementGreen Whatever blows your hair back, man. Enjoy the show! It'll be over soon.

@@kevinrtres To be honest, I can never watch more than a few minutes.

"..many church leaders told me I couldn't believe in Evolution, Astronomy, Genetics, etc., and become a Christian..." You just need to ignore those church leaders. They are simply wrong.

There are so many impact events that they know nothing about, from the Bible.

It is corrupt in my opinion... $$$

Kinda like st Christopher.... With his Dog head.... They certainly mixed

The Book of Enoch although not accepted as canon speaks to this.

Jesus himself said that angels cannot procreate; He should know, because He made them and everything else.. Angels and humans are very different beings and cannot have offspring. Even on earth the different animal kinds cannot have offspring together.

@@warpnin3 Jude 1:6-9 KJV And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the ...something fleshly was happening.

@@warpnin3 when Genesis used the phrase "went in unto them" it ment they fornicated. It's difficult to comprehend how authoritative people think themselves when in actuality, they are even more blind than a bat. 98 percent of people walk around with all the right answers to all the wrong questions and deem themselves knowledgeable. Just like people think God ordered Jacob to kill ordinary human beings when He told Isreal to kill every man woman and child and all the animals when in fact, those same people have no idea what The Sons of Anikem was. It took one comment to uproot everything you said, and I would wager that your certain of the validity of your reasoning.... and please don't think your unique in this haystack of misinformation because half, very conservatively, of the videos on RU-vid devolve down simular rabbit holes of spiritual deception.

What's a stretch is "yeah, some guy walked on water, and then he turned into wine, and then he died, and then he resurrected, and then....". Now that my friend, is a stretch.

@@hongotedesco8931 it's more verifiable than string theory my friend , all happened, but irrelevant and foolish I admit, till you ask him, try it, supercharge your understanding, hes currently available and not what you imagine.

@@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617😂😂😂😂

And it’s not a stretch to have a man ride from the dead

I’m a scientist, and this isn’t science.

What evidence do you have that it's not 6000 years old?

@@BionAvastar3000 Radiometric dating shows that Earth is about 4.5 billion years old.

@@billyb7465 Radiometric dating is flawed

@@BionAvastar3000 Knew you would say that. Have you looked into the rebuttals to the people who say that it is flawed?

@@BionAvastar3000 The oldest rock found to date is a piece of zircon. Radiometric dating, including uranium lead dating, which rely on the same laws of physics and chemistry we’re relying on to communicate on this platform, show the level of nuclear decay that has occurred on that rock occurred over 4.3 Billion years. Tens of thousands of other rocks found all over the earth, measured by thousands of scientists in dozens of countries trying to test other scientist’s conclusions, and prove them wrong, have been measured using multiple types of radiometric dating and consistently found to be 3-4 Billion years old. We took back moon rocks and tested them- ages ranged with the oldest being 4.4-4.5 billion years old. Geologists observe and measure the geological column that exists everywhere on the planet. The rates at which sediment gets deposited and different types of rocks form from elements of which they are made can be measured, and all the evidence from thousands of independent experiments, from thousands of scientists trying to prove each other wrong, points to an earth that is at least 4 Billion years old. Tectonic plates: we can measure the rates at which these plates are moving away from each other and find geologic evidence for where on the planet they were connected- then we do the math, and bingo, we get billions of years. Then there’s Flourine dating, measuring the level of Florine saturating a particular object, Dendrochronology dating- tree rings, Fission Track dating, Polar magnetic dating, and Thermo luminescent dating, all of which overlap and can be crossed checked against the various radiometric dating methods and all of which point to an earth that is billions, not thousands, of years old. Light travels at 186,000 miles/second squared. Light hits our retinas from stars that are billions of light years away. It literally took billions of years for the light you see from some of the stars/galaxies to travel to earth. Admittedly, this last point shows an old universe, not necessarily an old earth. A 6,000 year old earth is impossible. When elements decay, they give off heat. If we measure all of the nuclear decay we see and observe and presume it has taken place over 6,000 years, the amount of the heat released in that short of a period of time would be enough to melt the earths crust several thousand times over. We would be barbecued. By contrast, the amount of heat released from nuclear decay over a period of 4 billion years, gives us the planet we observe.

The young earth theory would be comical but for the tragedy of convincing the world that Christians are lunatics. Why would they believe anything else you might say, including the gospel?

You are welcome to "teach" anything you want to, as long as you do not claim science supports it when it doesn't.

​@@jockyoung4491you don't get to dictate to us what we teach and how. So buzz off. I seriously doubt we will be thinking of you when we do. 😅😅😅

It's sad that pastors would teach nonsense that makes void the word of God. God makes sense, a 6000 year old earth does not. Try understanding the first two verses in the bible and the rest will fall into place. It's vitally important to understand the Hebrew figures of speech. The earth is not a flat plane with a dome lid to hold in the water either.

​@@ji8044I'd rather make minimum wage on my way to heaven than live in a mansion destined for hell

​@@ji8044Mark 8:36- 37 For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? 37 Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?

It is an established scientific fact that the Earth is over 4.5 billion years.

​@@jockyoung4491it's really not fact at all. It's the evolutionary presupposition based on your worldview.

@@newcreationinchrist1423 It has nothing to do with "worldview". It is base solely on scientific observations using physical laws. And biological evolution has nothing to do with it.

​@@jockyoung4491😅😅😅😅 established fact eh?

​@@ji8044🤣 Jesus still loves you...

Which part? Just remember this is only one small segment of Christianity

@@beliefbite this guy has zero evidence for anything. He just tries to poke holes in solid logic and science. He is about as convincing as flat earthers or people who think aliens built the pyramids or Atlantis.

Trust me we aren't all like this.

​@Mothobius I'm genuinely curious why you chose to disparage your brother in Christ and take Satan's bait here. What part of his talk did you think was so far-fetched? Everything he said he gave examples for?

@triciamoon6312 Satan's bait oh man you are too far gone. Look it's been a while since I watched this garbage but I skimmed it again. This guy has zero idea of anything about science, the physical world, or anything. I think answers in genesis and people like this are an insult to creation. They choose to cherry pick misrepresent and destroy any advance of human intellectual progress because God. That's a legitimate insult to the true creator of this reality, universe, time, space, and dimensions. The creator God if you want to call it that created all we see and called upon us to understand it. That's called science. These hacks are an insult to God and I will never respect that. Amd no Christian should they are doing themselves a disservice.

We don’t know they coexisted in fact we know they didn’t coexist! A few fake or altered cave paintings aren’t evidence

Literally none of this makes sense

Which lasts longer over time? Reptile skin and scales or mamal hide like cows, deer, buffaloes, etc? How much more prevalent was the use of mamal hide for all the typical uses? Most likely whatever artifacts were actuality kept were lost, decayed, or destroyed.

@@rj-wz7do none of them were ever made because humans never hunted dinosaurs, or the other way around.

Why are there "dinosaurs" and/or 'Dragons' on many many artifacts??

@@danielhamid5569the higher up the food chain of knowledge you go, the more you realize you don’t know. You’d be surprised how smart and how much research people have put into the life and death of Christ. For every point you raise, I guarantee you there is a well thought out rebuttal. The fact you don’t know this, shows you haven’t had any real depth of research

The Jurassic Park franchise is known for having very inaccurate dinosaurs, but most dinosaurs were in fact fast as they had hollow light weight bones and endothermy like birds and mammals do. While skin impressions aren't always fossilized to give a clear picture of what the flesh and skin of the animal would look like, we do have others ways to tell. Anchiornis fossils have feather impressions so we can tell it was a feathered dinosaur.

Dinosaurs were as varied as mammals are today. Some were incredibly nimble and light, some extremely fast runners, some heavy and cattle-like, some giant yet quick hunters

No scientist is going to mistake a giraffe skeleton for a dinosaurs, even if it was fossilized.

Cathy, I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying that children's books on dinosaurs are unscientific and Jurassic Park is scientific?

Yes, be glad you don't have to roam around with T-rex. But the dinosaur existence and extinction had nothing to do with god. It had to do with the violent universe we live in. The same thing could happen to us at any point in the future.

What's your favourite dinosaur mine's the Triceratops

If you trusted your God, they would be as nothing. I'm not a person of faith, but don't understand how you claim to believe, yet, lack so much.

​@@sm360zfxmegatriceralodon

I'd watch that

Then how were dinosaurs with feathers non-avian if birds come from them? And why this recent claim of feathers found in fossils(about 15 years ago)of dinosaurs goes against the proven fact that t-rex for example was covered by scales and not feathers? And since no one can prove it's actually feathers in those fossils and not other structures resembling modern day birds feathers before birds even evolved them in the first place?

@@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves When was the last time you looked a dinosaur species phylogenetic tree? Birds are a ‘type’ of dinosaur, or off-shoot of them; Avialae. Thus becoming ‘Avian’ in their own nature. They’re a smaller form of Theropods. Similar to the concept of a woolly mammoth versus modern elephant; with and without the expression of body hair. Many whale species indeed have body hair or follicles that they keep/lose with age. Morphology and body size can dictate how various genes are expressed. Larger dinosaurs had thicker hides, with the genetic expression of follicular feathers or downy feathers blocked but scales prioritized, while the opposite was seen with smaller dinosaurs.

​@Originalongrace Feathered dinosaurs have been known since Darwin was alive, it is not a recent discovery. Feathers did not originally evolve for flight, they evolved for maintaining body temperature as theropods were endothermic like modern birds. We know this for certain because Dinosaurs like Oviraptor have been found fossilized while insulating a clutch of eggs. Oviraptor was definitely not a bird, but was a theropod. Not all theropods were feathered, as T-Rex was too large to need them for thermoregulation. Similar to how the largest mammals living today have very little hair. There is no argument that paleontologists have discovered feathers on some theropods. No one, not even you can honestly look at Anchiornis fossils and say that they aren't covered in feathers. It's so obvious what those are. Sinosauropteryx is a theropod with insulating fuzzy feathers, none evolved for flight or gliding. Birds specifically are theropod dinosaurs that modified their feathers for flight. The earliest birds flew, all species that are flightless now stem from flying ancestors. This becomes even more obvious when looking at Terror Birds, which are what happens when you try to make a large carnivorous theropod dinosaur out of a bird. Birds are dinosaurs. Everyone who studies paleontology knows this. There's way too much evidence to deny it. Besides feathers on theropods, birds have genes for teeth which look exactly like dinosaur teeth, they have identical leg bone shapes, they have a fusion of tail vertebrae called the pygostyle. Fusion of bones imply unfusion in an ancestor. Birds share most of their DNA with Crocodilians which are the only other archosaurs left. This makes sense because dinosaurs were archosaurs so birds would also be archosaurs. If you think birds aren't dinosaurs, you're either lying to yourself or just plain ignorant of paleontology, biology and genetics.

​@@hylaherping9180i am not sure since my knowledge of dinosaurs is still growing and my meories are messed up, but wasn't it like birds had almost the exact genes that e.g a deinonychus had, they just aren't active?

@starskill7468 I don't think there's any way we could know what genes Dinosaurs had because they are only know from fossils. No DNA preserved.

You are correct that claiming there MUST not be a god is a matter of faith. But most "atheists" simply view the idea of God as unlikely and unnecessary.

Couldn't you also say that you have to know everything to say there is a god? What if there is some definitive evidence out there that disproves it?

Ok, let's correct your programming a bit. You do not need to 'know everything' to be an atheist. Not even close. You simply need to have enough of a grasp on reality, and some critical thinking skills, and refuse to grant exceptions just to make a story work out the way you like it. In other words, you need to have a consistent standard of evidence for any claims that are important in your life. If someone tells you they will sell you a bridge for $10 you are right to demand some evidence they have the right to do this. It's a very basic thing people usually learn early in life. Well, same here. Someone tells you that there is a supernatural being watching your every moving, that will sit in judgement over you, and that it demands you live your life a certain way, and give money to his representatives, they should have some credible evidence that you can verify satisfactorily to back that claim up. Theism lacks anything resembling credible evidence. So, preachers and apologists have gone to a lot of trouble to create pseudo evidence, and this video is a beautiful example of what I am talking about. To make this 'evidence' work they are asking you to ignore reality, to not do any valid research, to make exceptions to allow for their story to be true. Their phd holders are shills, unethical people willing to take money to fabricate false 'science' and data. Bodie is one, another is Steve Austin, there are quite a few. They know how the science works so they also know how to do what looks like real science to an outsider but get results they want, or, results that make the tech look unreliable. They do this all the time to try and discredit radiometric dating, something that is highly reliable on a consistent basis and is widely used in a number of ways.

Whatchu talkin'bout, Willis? Impossible to be an atheist? Here I am, being one right now. I don't say there is no god, just that I have not seen any evidence compelling enough to make me believe in a god answering to any of the descriptions of gods I have been presented so far.

It made me feel closer to throwing up listening to this nonsense.

There is no god The earth is 5 billion years old and the universe 13,7 billion years old Google the Webb and Hubble telescope and the speed of light

How about the fact that those sightings NEVER have been confirmed?!

I'm scottish and everyone here knows the Loch Ness monster was a hoax to promote early tourism, some people will believe anything that they are told

Funny, now that everyone carries cameras in their pockets these sightings have disappeared. Coincidence?

How's about that? Not a single solitary actual real sighting!

How about mokele mbembe in the congo? Kent Hovind did a video all about dinosaur sightings which included this one.

Yes, even more corruption in your faith is a perfect idea.

It isn’t science to throw around non scientific claims like the guy does here, it’s actually an insult to science.

Yes he isn’t a scientist in fact almost none will side with this man or his kind.

The two have nothing to do with each other. Evolution is purely science and can't say anything about faith or God or the future. Many Christians accept the science of evolution.

& kids who believe in Santa have every year to look forward to leaving him milk & cookies. Even if heaven was a better alternative to nothing, it doesn’t matter if it’s not real.

As an evolutionist, I see my time on earth as the time I have to live my life. After I die, I will rot away and become nutrients for new living beings. I have no fear of death; I figure it will be just the same as all the thousands/millions of years before I was born, years I have no experience or memory of.

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

@gamingguru2602 Right. The book that's a copy of a copy of a translation of a translation, whose "most important"parts are anonymous and passed down orally for at least 30 years and strongly point to being copied off each other, is speaking for itself. How much have you fact checked, again?

@@lucbos7516Give it a chance,You may be interested,God loves you

​@@lucbos7516God exists as science and history demonstrate even if you don't want to have faith that's just the truth

​@@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Birds are mentioned

@@globalcoupledances Dinosaurs aren’t. We did not live with them. We were essentially archaic squirrels in their day 200-65 million years ago.

The Bible does contradict science Evolution is a fact. The earth is billions of years old.

What year were you born?

@@LordMathious Oh, I know there isn't, nor will there likely ever be. I was just joking around about that part. The stories and reports about the "kongomoto(s)" are true, though (in the sense that there *are* stories and reports about kongomotos, not necessarily that those stories and reports are true).

Coelacanths are an order of fish, not a single species. The two species alive today are not anything like the many species found in the fossil record. The large gap between ancient and modern Coelacanths is due to how rare fossilization is, and the problem of where the fish lived. Since they only live in deep sea caves, we'd only be able to find them throughout the gap if deep sea cave systems eroded in every layer between the Mesozoic and modern periods. Even then, there'd still be no guarantee the fish would even have fossilized in spots we'd be able to dig in.

And the movie “Journey to the Center of the Earth”. Watch it it will amaze you totally! ❤️🌈🙏🌎🎶

@user-kr8pt4iu6g That and Ice Age 3 are not documentaries, they're fiction.

Have you seen the movie “ The Journey to the Center of the Earth?” It will blow your attitude. You will be amazed at what you see. Amen. ❤️🙏🌈🌎🎶

LOL!

@@junglelawman728 what? Where is your evidence that it’s not

@@Joshua-vl5pc Your claim.... you provide the evidence.

@@junglelawman728 Natural selection Dna mutation Fossil record Observable changes Do you have discord? We can debate there if you want

@junglelawman728 - I can add evidence of comparative physiology and biochemistry, comparative anatomy, biogeography, speciation, coloration, behavior, mathematical modeling and simulation

That’s a good point

Tell me what that semantics conclusively proves?,nothing, only possibilities and coincidence. Certainly doesn't prove that dragons were dinosaurs .Mythical creatures could be a whole amalgam of different creatures or animals, possibly even combined by enthusiastic and ignorant explorers.

I wont lie, I bursted out laughing Specially considering we found t-rex remains with theyr last meals still contained in theyr belly Dont even get me started on Yutyrannus

tell me u do not understand english without telling me