Тёмный

What happens if AI alignment goes wrong, explained by Gilfoyle of Silicon valley. 

ΚilledByAI: Η Τεχνητή Νοημοσύνη αλλάζει τον κόσμο.
Просмотров 286 тыс.
50% 1

The AI alignment problem.
The alignment problem in AI refers to the challenge of designing AI systems with objectives, values, and actions that closely align with human intentions and ethical considerations.
One of AI’s main alignment challenges is its black box nature (inputs and outputs are identifiable but the transformation process in between is undetermined). The lack of transparency makes it difficult to know where the system is going right and where it is going wrong.
Aligning AI involves two main challenges: carefully specifying the purpose of the system (outer alignment) and ensuring that the system adopts the specification robustly (inner alignment).
I think the following video from the Silicon Valley series, explains perfectly what can happen in case we do not succeed in alignment.
#ai #alignment #siliconvalley #aiethics
=================================
Subscribe for more videos like this: www.oknoob.com/youtube
=================================
=================================
My blog: www.oknoob.com/
My podcast: www.oknoob.com/podcast
=================================
Follow me on social media:
=================================
Instagram: @oknoobcom
Twitter: @oknoobcom
Facebook: oknoobcom
DISCLAIMER: This video and description may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I may receive a small commission. This costs nothing to you but helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!

Опубликовано:

 

29 апр 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 260   
@PanzerMold
@PanzerMold Год назад
The classic phrase "It's a feature, not a bug." Maxed to the fucked degree.
@AD-wx5nz
@AD-wx5nz 6 месяцев назад
"It's a feature not a bug " that's the most debated line in the tech world. Business stakeholders, PMs and Devs could really get into it over that one line
@Mr_Jish
@Mr_Jish 6 месяцев назад
Meanwhile on QA I just get to sit back and eat popcorn while it happens even though I'm usually the one that sparked that debate in the first place 😂
@Qobilaktika
@Qobilaktika 8 месяцев назад
1:35 "It is a feature, not a bug" brilliantly delivered one liner
@cjxgraphics
@cjxgraphics 8 месяцев назад
My left ear really enjoyed this.
@Reu8enofleon
@Reu8enofleon Год назад
Dinesh: You sound like you’re looking forward to it. Gilfoyle: I’m adaptable.
@levyloup-noe6187
@levyloup-noe6187 6 месяцев назад
Because I'm BATMAN !
@d3r4g0d8
@d3r4g0d8 Год назад
Man, I miss this show - truly ahead of his time.
@ItachiKai
@ItachiKai Год назад
The last season kinda blew though
@Jay-ft3xh
@Jay-ft3xh 11 месяцев назад
Show was middle of the road and then TJ went all macho douche and the show shouldve ended there.
@illuhe9657
@illuhe9657 7 месяцев назад
BAZINGA AHAHAHAH BAZINGA SO FUN SO GEEK BAZINGA
@Aryan-ji2nk
@Aryan-ji2nk Год назад
So you're telling me the person explaining all this has 0 knowledge about Software🤔, Now that's top tier acting skills
@TheMiist
@TheMiist Год назад
Remembering words is what every actor does
@Aryan-ji2nk
@Aryan-ji2nk Год назад
@@TheMiist I would say not just words, but the expression and tone he gave during this scene really showed us like he really knew some shit
@JosiahWarren
@JosiahWarren Год назад
Yes except its bs . I say this As senior software engineer. Its like deloryan flux capacitor bs
@adastra79
@adastra79 11 месяцев назад
@@JosiahWarrenI know this is a stupid question but why? I understand (probably) that you can simplify (ie optimise) any given equation to a point when no more simplification is possible, but why can’t you have a feedback loop between 2 programs just eternally patching themselves as infinitum?
@iorekby
@iorekby 11 месяцев назад
​@@adastra79 They aren't patching themselves for a start. Compression simply makes things smaller by using sophisticated algorithms and concatenations of data. That might have some utility in AI with large datasets, but it won't make the AI "smarter". If anything it would simply make it faster, and possibly cheaper (good AI is NOT cheap to run btw, it's computationally very expensive). But making AI faster doesn't mean it starts going outside it's parameters and tearing down the internet protocols and encryption. That's where it gets a bit silly and moves more in to narrative fiction for the sake of the plot. AI isn't some internet poltergeist. AI does have parameters. These are defined. You even see this with Chat GPT where certain things are omitted that are too dangerous (e.g. how to make certain weapons). What this scene is basically saying is: Imagine you have the world's smartest sheepdog in a large pen with teflon caging and rocks just in the surface. Now we are trimming it's coat to make it lighter, so it can run a little faster and herd sheep better.....but now because we trimmed it's coat and it runs faster, it's going to somehow mean it will escape its teflon cage with solid sock under the soil. and start breaking in to everyone's house and mauling them..... You see how that's a silly leap in logic, right. It's kinda what I think the other person was alluding too with this scene.
@B.I.B.L.E.
@B.I.B.L.E. 7 месяцев назад
This show was equal parts hilarity and ominous foreshadowing. Mike Judge does it again.
@yogasrinivasreddy504
@yogasrinivasreddy504 Год назад
Didn't know the line "it's a feature not a bug" would be this scary
@TerexJ
@TerexJ Год назад
The AI dystopia is not nearly as bad as the dystopia we currently live in where the same people who will type out several paragraphs of information about AI development in their video description and who have a podcast still don't know how to upload a video with audio in both channels. It's truly a horrifying time we live in.
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
I like your observation. Its to separate AIs from real humans. Now i know.
@iorekby
@iorekby 11 месяцев назад
I also wish the discourse around AI on said podcasts was exclusively from people who actually study AI or work in the field. Instead of some bros making armpit fart noises, who have YT comments filled with "Bro it's like Ultron in Avengers 2" PSA: If you're reference point for AI is a kids movie based on a comic book, kindly stop talking. You have zero clue about the subject.
@riffsthatkill2180
@riffsthatkill2180 10 месяцев назад
Looks more like several sentences than several paragraphs.
@californiarollwithramensea8220
@californiarollwithramensea8220 8 месяцев назад
​@iorekby so you want there to be legislation that regulates podcasts? You'd like what Canada is doing but that doesn't fly in a free country.
@MisterPenguin42
@MisterPenguin42 8 месяцев назад
lol
@Rob8729
@Rob8729 3 месяца назад
Just like the real world, some people exclaim "oh fuck" while most people just stare at you and ask "Why did you say that"
@demiserofd
@demiserofd Год назад
They made a big mistake here. They are, as far as they know, the first people to reach this point. That means they have the power to determine the course of human progression. Instead, they left that to the next ones to reach the same point, who might not be as ethical. If they could have programmed the AI to PROTECT privacy rather than destroy it, then they could have done so permanently. Instead, they only delayed the inevitable.
@yogasrinivasreddy504
@yogasrinivasreddy504 Год назад
I get your point but there is no fix for it like he explained, if they wanted to protect privacy the enterprise would fail, or if the enterprise were to be protected privacy will fail.
@iorekby
@iorekby 11 месяцев назад
@@yogasrinivasreddy504 IRL there would be a fix for it, but going back to the show, maybe keeping this on and opening it up gets more brains looking at it, and they see something the guys don't to fix it. That's why Open source movement in software has been such a massive success: So many smart people sharing their work and collaborating and making it better as people in this larger community fix problems other's may not have noticed.
@deepspacecow2644
@deepspacecow2644 11 месяцев назад
the AI modifies itself though. Its why the youtube and google algorithms are unkown in exactly how they function. @@iorekby
@humann5682
@humann5682 11 месяцев назад
@deepspacecow2644 But do RU-vid algorithms go out a start "breaking encryption". Exactly. Thata the point they are making.
@TheRestlessView
@TheRestlessView 10 месяцев назад
It's more about, once this knowledge gets out, it becomes deadly. They use the analogy of the mile run that means that once they show it is possible to do something like this, for better or worse someone will figure it out and replicate it. I mean in the show hoolis engineers weren't actually that far behind them when they learned about the compression and China managed to scrape together code to rival there's, they were always just barely in the lead with their tech. So the only way stop this way of thinking was indeed to fail spectacularly and yeah sure maybe someone later on will discover the secret but by that time maybe they'll be in a better position to handle it then, better than the one they currently were in at the moment.
@VesuviasV
@VesuviasV 8 месяцев назад
Given the rumors out of open AI, this aged rather well.
@00bikeboy
@00bikeboy 7 месяцев назад
The finale was a masterpiece.
@craigmcfly
@craigmcfly 6 месяцев назад
And this is why Person of Interest was so brilliant and so terrifying at the same time!
@geraltofrivia9424
@geraltofrivia9424 10 месяцев назад
The last sentence is perfect.
@upandaljm
@upandaljm 7 месяцев назад
loved this show
@ashjogalekar8814
@ashjogalekar8814 9 месяцев назад
Gilfoyle is really the best.
@tamelo
@tamelo Год назад
If that AI could crack encryption, it would be just a matter of time before another AI to crack it too. They just postpone the apocalypse.
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
True. It's a snowball effect right there.
@ryanleemartin7758
@ryanleemartin7758 Год назад
I think we're always just postponing the apocalypse.
@Armuotas
@Armuotas Год назад
My morbid curiosity wants to see how the apocalypse evolves, yet I don't want to live in it. Not sure how to feel about it. Someone please tell me.
@baxakk7374
@baxakk7374 Год назад
​@@Armuotas abject terror for you
@b_two
@b_two 8 месяцев назад
This must be why Ilya Sutskever fired Sam Altman
@julien5053
@julien5053 8 месяцев назад
If only the leaks are true. If it's an elaborate fake, no. For the time being we don't know. It's plausible though.
@jamesfrankel7827
@jamesfrankel7827 7 месяцев назад
P=NP..No more cryptography.
@Youtuberboi596
@Youtuberboi596 Год назад
If pied piper need to reach a level of efficiency, and the AI made the algorithm that efficient, then they could have just removed the AI or told it to stop making it more efficient, and just have kept the now-optimized algorithm for use. And if they need to keep a level of efficiency as the network grew, then they could have tasked the AI to only reach that level of efficiency.
@Jonnyrockin71
@Jonnyrockin71 Год назад
Good stuff. I actually understand that..... sorta.
@Haannibal777
@Haannibal777 Год назад
Another analogy, ask the kettle to stop when the water is boiled.
@kennycasado800
@kennycasado800 Год назад
Granted that is a simple solution in which can work but in the greater scheme of things, Their greatest fear was if someone reverse engineered the code. Who’s to say that person will stop there? Great example, Jin Yang.
@cancerino666
@cancerino666 Год назад
@@kennycasado800 PiedPiper could have just reverse engineered the algorithm the AI was performing and use that instead. Hence no one would be really able to reverse engineer the AI itself, because they would just be using a traditional algorithm at that point.
@kennycasado800
@kennycasado800 Год назад
@@cancerino666 Correct, however their code way to advance and the world already knew its potential. Remember the burning man episode? You can’t just reverse engineer a program after your investors and the world seen its capabilities, that brings to many questions, also the are certain someone else can build on their code. It was too much of a risk factor that will lead back to them. Best case scenario, kill it publicly
@Max-ei2so
@Max-ei2so 6 месяцев назад
What season and episode is this one?
@dankelly
@dankelly Год назад
I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords.
@j.503
@j.503 Год назад
Do they welcome us is the question.
@peezieforestem5078
@peezieforestem5078 Год назад
a fitting message to put on your grave.
@6318374
@6318374 11 месяцев назад
All hail lord MEGATRON !!!!🤖
@realdragon
@realdragon Месяц назад
And AI welcomes you random dog
@celebrim1
@celebrim1 Год назад
There are a number of problems with this speech if you are into comp. sci. I mean, it's a great little thought experiment and a cool way to set up the finale, but... 1) P != NP There are no polynomial solutions to certain NP problems. Sure, we haven't exactly developed a proof of that yet, but we know enough about the question now to be really really confident. 2) But let's say P == NP. Well, so what? We just task the computer with being its own adversary and producing encryption standards which are still difficult to solve in polynomial time. Patent them and suddenly Pied Piper is the richest corporation in the world by a long short. Aside from this you can start creating P == NP solutions to dozens of other hard problems. Afterall, just because a polynomial solution exists doesn't mean that the polynomial solution is fast. And in the meantime we got along just fine with non-digital physical means of security. People would adapt. 3) More importantly, if P == NP well that's a law of the universe and you have to deal with it. You can't put the nuclear bomb back in a box and hide it under a bed. Once humanity reaches a sufficient level of understanding, you have to accept that anyone that really wants one badly enough can make one. Likewise, just because you tear down Pied Piper doesn't mean that people won't in the near future repeatedly recreate your work. If P == NP and you don't want a dystopian future then the best way to ensure that is ensure you are ahead of the technology curve and are the team first developing cryptographic solutions that are still difficult to brute force even in polynomial time.
@InigoPhentoya
@InigoPhentoya Год назад
Re: 1, if a problem is NP, it is by definition solvable in polynomial time. Perhaps you meant to say "no deterministic", or refer to NP-Hard/NP-Complete instead of NP?
@celebrim1
@celebrim1 Год назад
@@InigoPhentoya No. If a problem is NP, by definition it can only be verified in polynomial time. P == NP would assert that if a problem can be verified in polynomial time, then it can also be solved in polynomial time. P != NP would assert that there exists a class of problems which can be verified in polynomial time, but not solved in polynomial time.
@InigoPhentoya
@InigoPhentoya Год назад
The mistake you've now made twice is to exclude non-deterministic machines (the very namesake of NP, we should note) from consideration. Verifiable deterministically / solvable non-deterministically in polynomial time are equivalent definitions of NP.
@InigoPhentoya
@InigoPhentoya Год назад
PS: your definition implies P != NP ( "can only be verified"), making it rather problematic as a definition :p
@DajesOfficial
@DajesOfficial 6 месяцев назад
@@InigoPhentoya A non-deterministic solution is a fancy way to say bad solution. Picking a random value is an example of nondeterministic solution (sometimes you will randomly get optimal value)
@derekjohnson8910
@derekjohnson8910 29 дней назад
It’s genuinely chilling to hear Gilfoyle telling Richard that Pied Piper is running as intended. He deadpans so well, but his enunciation is so much more severe, and you can see it on his face. Gilfoyle is genuinely afraid.
@mikeyjohnson5888
@mikeyjohnson5888 7 месяцев назад
Whats interesting is Gilfoyle was totally wrong. Its implied in the epilogue some members of the team used their AI and profited from it.
@runoke
@runoke 6 месяцев назад
As far as I understand, Monica just immediately brought it to some government agency and got a cushy job.
@Matthew8473
@Matthew8473 5 месяцев назад
This is exceptional in every way. I had the pleasure of reading something similar, and it was exceptional in every way. "The Hidden Empire: Inside the Private Worlds of Elite CEOs" by Adam Skylight
@fuffoon
@fuffoon 6 месяцев назад
Read the Avagadro (not the actual name but that will find it) series if you like AI sci-fi. Easy, fun, action filled. Cool stuff.
@franciscovillav
@franciscovillav 6 месяцев назад
pied piper AI solved one of the millium problems ... NP = P
@realdragon
@realdragon Месяц назад
Now suddenly everybody in the comments is specialist in AI
@keepmehomeplease
@keepmehomeplease 21 день назад
There is no real “specialist” in “AI” as it has become such a scattered and vast term that it really means nothing. Most of what you see are software devs thinking they know A and B because they took cryptography 10 years ago, basic informed search algos from an Indian website, and make OpenAI API calls every Sunday.
@realdragon
@realdragon 21 день назад
@@keepmehomeplease What software devs? I doubt 90% of people here talking about AI even programed print("Hello World") in python
@mrbluesky853
@mrbluesky853 Год назад
Why didnt they just copy the Pied Piper learning algorithm and modify it so that instead of codebreaking they make one to protect incription
@jackderrida
@jackderrida 8 месяцев назад
Same reason we don't fine tune generative language models to give wrong answers to our prompts to prevent them from getting smarter. It wouldn't really accomplish anything.
@DavidChow
@DavidChow 6 месяцев назад
I love Monica's withering shutdown of Jared. Woefully underused Amanda Crews.
@adrianaslund8605
@adrianaslund8605 7 месяцев назад
Damn the writing on this show is so tight.
@codingportfolio7760
@codingportfolio7760 11 месяцев назад
Bill Haverchuck really had a future
@Nick-qn6sp
@Nick-qn6sp 4 месяца назад
This feels like a incoming reality , Richard Hendricks is Sam altman
@MrUslatham
@MrUslatham 7 месяцев назад
The military’s “internet” is on a closed separate network. This AI wouldn’t have accesss to any launch codes
@jamesfrankel7827
@jamesfrankel7827 7 месяцев назад
Launch codes, missile sites are all air gapped, like by dozens of miles of farm land. Surveillance systems are networked or on their own separate cable/fiber networks.
@toyotaboyhatman
@toyotaboyhatman 4 месяца назад
It's the plot of sneakers, except that concept could actually happen now "no more secrets"
@themartdog
@themartdog Год назад
I think this problem is generally exaggerated though (hence this unrealistic, fictional representation of an inherently unsolvable problem of cracking 256 bit encryption). Will AI's inner alignment reflect biases in the data used to train it? Yes. Is AI the genie from tales of old that intentionally misinterprets instructions and gives a result with an undesired process? No.
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
Well you see, you dont know that. We currently have proof of alignment issues with simple "good intended" tasks. So you cant tell how these models, or intellects will react in a scenario where they are given (or they have fooled as to give) access to control of any type in order to complete a "good intended" task.
@themartdog
@themartdog Год назад
@@oknoobcom You can say the same thing about any human too. The question that should be asked is, "are these AI systems more or less biased than a human doing the same task"
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
@@themartdog I believe the problem here is the scale. AI can do AT LEAST the same damage at an exponential rate.
@themartdog
@themartdog Год назад
@@oknoobcom Show me something that's not a work of fiction that proves that and I'll take it seriously
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
@@themartdog dont get your question. Also, im not trying to make you take anything seriously. :)
@machinesandthings7121
@machinesandthings7121 6 месяцев назад
So funny to see this again after what just happened at OpenAI.
@s0kulite
@s0kulite 5 месяцев назад
My left ear likes this
@zachmoyer1849
@zachmoyer1849 2 месяца назад
huh guess my earbuds are in backwards
@al-bot1094
@al-bot1094 Год назад
Tell it to play Tic-Tac-Toe. That always works.
@TheMattsem
@TheMattsem 6 месяцев назад
Frank Herbert is the one who wrote Dune
@andrewhooper7603
@andrewhooper7603 6 месяцев назад
I know who fucking Frank Herbert is.
@orangejuliaa
@orangejuliaa 3 месяца назад
@@andrewhooper7603was that gendered? i’m sorry, that was gendered
@XxHitmanAssassinxX
@XxHitmanAssassinxX 6 месяцев назад
I can't believe I did not see a "My left ear loved this video" because I was looking for it.
@tomikexboii5403
@tomikexboii5403 5 месяцев назад
Q-Star says Hi!
@Leetneetcode1729
@Leetneetcode1729 9 месяцев назад
my left year enjoyed it
@seanwebb605
@seanwebb605 8 месяцев назад
Is that the previous year? Is the right year the year to come?
@B1gLupu
@B1gLupu 7 месяцев назад
For those who this goes over your head, its basically A^x = B being easy to make, just input X and A and calculate B, but figuring out what A and X are by knowing only B take more computation. Its kinda the same as Prime1 * Prime2 = X Its easy to choose prime1 and prime 2 and calculate X, but takes more computation to do it the other way around by solving Prime1 and Prime2 from X. Math that is easy one way and difficult in the other is the basis of modern encryption.
@ShyamJoshi-
@ShyamJoshi- 8 месяцев назад
Wow i really don't have smart enough friend to discuss something like this God damn
@haxstat
@haxstat 7 месяцев назад
I made a raelly good code in unity, it uses batching and uses textures for the animation of things to get the GPU working instead of the CPU. I don't know how to code in unity or C#
@mrpicky1868
@mrpicky1868 7 месяцев назад
when low quality TV show understands AGi better then everyone else
@Ramone_Alcalino
@Ramone_Alcalino Год назад
Classic gilfoyle
@okramoffacebook1381
@okramoffacebook1381 Год назад
So,this AI developed a SYSTEM to enhance it's SKILLSETS which then further enhances it's System which then enhances it's Skillsets. I'll copy that for myself
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
Yes, indeed. At the point where AI can self-improve, the singularity point, if we havent figured out alignment,... well... its not good.
@casefc3s
@casefc3s Год назад
@@oknoobcom alignment will do nothing for us in the long run and next to nothing in the short.
@4arrows4all
@4arrows4all 6 месяцев назад
Q star baby!
@AC3handle
@AC3handle Год назад
And somewhere, Edwin Snowden is laughing his ass off.
@Grubnar
@Grubnar 7 месяцев назад
Isn't he still in Russia?
@budgetarms
@budgetarms 7 месяцев назад
It's a feature, not a bug
@easternplatypus
@easternplatypus 9 месяцев назад
my left ear loved this
@LucasSilva-nu1md
@LucasSilva-nu1md 4 месяца назад
Q*
@johnc8209
@johnc8209 6 месяцев назад
Why not have an ai create better security by testing its own security then adjusting its old self?
@seanwebb605
@seanwebb605 8 месяцев назад
But the file compression is fantastic!
@Jozzster
@Jozzster 7 месяцев назад
Why is the sound only in the left ear?
@josephsellers5978
@josephsellers5978 6 месяцев назад
Except for all that is just nonsense on the fear factor. You would just shut it all down and go back to doing paperwork and radio frequency communications with old pre-tech cryptology methods for launch codes and such.
@kimballinfidel6447
@kimballinfidel6447 6 месяцев назад
How does he know Doobs?
@orlovskyconsultinggbr2849
@orlovskyconsultinggbr2849 Год назад
Well they done big mistake not hiring a IT consultancy to fix the problem by which they limit themselves, sure for tv show it would be like really dramatic , but in real life this happens a lot.
@somerandomchannel382
@somerandomchannel382 Год назад
I dont think you understand. This means pied piper will create world annihilation if released. This is not a job for an IT consultancy. They are an IT company creating the world smartest AI. And the only thing kept it at bay, was having it locked inside a isolated computer system. OpenAI, chatgpt, I'm still not afraid of as I haven't seen consciousness. But honestly. That is not required. Because a computer having access and ability to handle all data in the world. Will have all keys in a world. We already setup for global chaos. And it will come quicker as they AI's database grows. Not consciousness but a public hall with all keys in the world.
@isthatyoursomnomnom
@isthatyoursomnomnom 6 месяцев назад
Don't tease me with a good time. #TeamAIOverlords
@hendyadheeva666
@hendyadheeva666 8 месяцев назад
The ai is idea of mission impossible dead reckoning
@1sor
@1sor Месяц назад
AI is the compression
@ttrev007
@ttrev007 7 месяцев назад
on the up side the nucks are not hooked up to the internet
@broccoli4487
@broccoli4487 10 месяцев назад
My left ear enjoyed this
@denisblack9897
@denisblack9897 Год назад
AI + Blockchain guys decentralized autonomous ai agents
@fizipcfx
@fizipcfx 9 месяцев назад
the real calamity, you cant shutdown everything to it wins
@override367
@override367 Год назад
This is really dumb for a lot of reasons, (this thing isn't brute forcing its way through encryption really any faster than any other algorithm would, and existing countermeasures to brute forcing would be just as effective against it), the idea that you can't build a neural network that has constraints on it is idiotic
@philippg4261
@philippg4261 Год назад
It's not brute forcing anything. The premise here is that NP = P; a problem that was thought to be unsolvable in polynomial time (hence used pretty much for all modern cryptosystems) was solved by the AI in polynomial time. Examples of this are the discrete log problem shown in the show, but also more simplistic ones like the travelling salesman or the knapsack problem. That's also the threat that they are scared of in the show, since if you prove that one NP complete problem is solvable in polynomial time, you (mostly) can show that others are, too.
@TheArtPerspective
@TheArtPerspective 6 месяцев назад
It's just Generative
@arilegall2001
@arilegall2001 Год назад
Discrete log in polynomial time?? Wtf is polynomial time??😂😂
@Happyduderawr
@Happyduderawr Год назад
It's a concept from computer science. In laymans terms, "polynomial time" means a fast amount of time. So what they did was make an A.I that , for programs that take thousands or millions of years to finish (think guessing a long password by trying every combination), they reduced it to polynomial time, which means the program can run in seconds or hours instead. What this means is that all passwords would be hacked, and it would be an end to encryption. This is because encryption relies on computers trying to solve a problem that ordinarily takes millions of years, which realistically isn't doable. What they actually did was make every smartphone in the world about as powerful as the worlds most powerful supercomputer, or more so actually.
@Dekatelon
@Dekatelon Год назад
And in today's news: AI kills it's annoying USAF operator so that it can hunt down threats more efficiently
@totdodwotdit
@totdodwotdit Год назад
Look a tiny bit deeper that story is pure BS.
@Dekatelon
@Dekatelon Год назад
@@totdodwotdit I know - it's funny nonetheless
@XDarkLordXP
@XDarkLordXP 6 месяцев назад
Well, not exactly. Especially not today. Misalignment is when you tell it to collect the gold coin and instead it learns to walk left.
@tylerwinkle323
@tylerwinkle323 Год назад
People trying to understand AI is like a flock of parakeets trying to understand human language. Lots of noise, little substance.
@JoshSweetvale
@JoshSweetvale Год назад
Yeah but when everything's voice activated... Or in our world, activated by strings of text. The infinite monkey typewriter will eventually sign the end of the world.
@MaximGhost
@MaximGhost 6 месяцев назад
Paperclip
@jacobitosuperstar
@jacobitosuperstar 9 месяцев назад
I love how people that don' know shit talk about a doomsday scenario. People just want the end of the world. I guess thats what happens when you are just unhappy.
@LabTech41
@LabTech41 Год назад
The problem isn't that a company could create an AI that could fuck the entire paradigm of the global system; it's that we're going to HAVE to create such a system ourselves to make sure that our system is the top dog of the global order, because if we decide to be Luddites about it, it means that some fucker in China, or Pakistan, or Russia will be the ones to invent it because they don't have the 'let's keep this genie in the bottle' mentality. This is inevitable, the only question is whether it's controlled, or a clusterfuck.
@Wael3rd
@Wael3rd Год назад
Hahahahaha hahahahaha, you mean the same keep it in a bottle mentality that the US had with the effing NUCLEAR BOMB? I did a 360 rolling my eyes over this one.
@LabTech41
@LabTech41 Год назад
@@Wael3rd I know it's fashionable these days to bash on America, out of jealousy more than anything else if we're being honest, but that was honestly barely a surface level element of the equation I'm talking about here, which has to do how our species chooses to handle the advent of this new technology. You're getting lost in the weeds while I'm trying to show you the stars.
@brandon27025
@brandon27025 Год назад
​@@LabTech41 lmao. Jealousy. Hard pass.
@VitorCoelho6
@VitorCoelho6 Год назад
Are we completely ignoring that the US was the only country to launch chemical and nuclear bombs on civilians on purpose? Just asking so we can be on the same page on that mentality..
@LabTech41
@LabTech41 Год назад
@@VitorCoelho6 Ok, you seem intelligent, unlike the others in the thread, so I need you to dig deeper than the mere surface here to the more complex reality beneath. We used nukes on Japan to SAVE lives, because it was well known that every man, woman, and child that could hold a weapon in their hands was going to fight to the death to protect their country and their Emperor; nukes, while devastating, saves millions of lives by showing the Japanese they had no choice but to surrender. The flipside of that is the nightmare scenario of: what if the Nazis had finished THEIR work on the nuclear bomb, and had an opportunity to use it on, say, NYC or DC? You make the weapon FIRST, so you have supremacy of power, and thus you can dictate the terms, and as corrupt and incompetent as the US often is, it's a damn sight better than the alternatives. Just think about it: this tech is GOING to be made... would you rather WE have it, or Russia/China/Iran?
@insertnamehere4550
@insertnamehere4550 Год назад
Mono sound in 2023 lmao.
@controlfreak1963
@controlfreak1963 7 месяцев назад
p==np
@chasemorello60
@chasemorello60 3 месяца назад
🤖🚩🏴‍☠️
@idwtgymn
@idwtgymn 6 месяцев назад
This was the dumbest plot device for so many reasons. First, this is not how AI works, it doesn't work out a general solution like that, this would be a whole new kind of AI completely different from the kind we have, not just a better version or a variant of what we have - it would be something currently unimagined. In other words this guy on the side built the single most sophisticated algorithm from start to finish, it would be like the Wright brothers building a space shuttle. Second, it is ridiculous to assume breaking one encryption means it can break another, there are plenty of encryption algorithms known that would not be broken by the technical thing he said and there is no reason to just jump to the conclusion that it solved one hard problem so it can solve all hard problems. Third, even if you accept the technologically ridiculous premise, which it is sad you have to do because in other ways this show was pretty intelligent, if one guy with computing power not in excess of a single top tier super computer broke encryption, encryption is not long for this world no matter what. So the most responsible thing they could do would be to inform the world encryption is broken, giving the world time to adjust before someone nefarious had access to the tech. This idea that this one guy breaks encryption then shuts it down and thus the problem is solved is pathetic. This ending ruined the whole show.
@montediaz5915
@montediaz5915 4 месяца назад
Wrong. Q*
@exec.producer2566
@exec.producer2566 3 месяца назад
The only part about this that didn’t make sense is that if you actually programmed an encryption buster, the US govt would be knocking at your door at offering billions
@zachmoyer1849
@zachmoyer1849 2 месяца назад
i think that is kind of why they ended it the way they did because you could kind of assume that any of them were still using it to help in their current endeavors and what's her name worked for the NSA
@just.jocelyn7329
@just.jocelyn7329 Год назад
It's RIGHT ITS REAL WTF this SI chat GBT
@override367
@override367 Год назад
Chat GPT cannot break encryption and it is a ludicrously inefficient way to do math. A laptop from 20 years ago is more capable of doing math than a session of chatGPT, despite that session having a thousand times as much compute power available to it, because running the chatbot and the other AIs that interface with it is exceptionally expensive. A rasberry pi is more dangerous to cracking passwords than ChatGPT
@sugandesenuds6663
@sugandesenuds6663 10 месяцев назад
@@override367 be careful what you are saying bro! i got my Raspberry pi guessing your password! when i'm done in *Checks Notes* 4 Million years i will leak all your Data!
@abhishekn7200
@abhishekn7200 6 месяцев назад
Must of the hollywood phony writers who writes story based on technology just graze upon some topic briefly and vomit some random crap. Silicon valley writers are one of the exceptions. They really must have done a lot of homework. They being said, this is half assed
@fatherjack8274
@fatherjack8274 4 месяца назад
Nah, they just had the AI solve P=NP by itself in the course of attempting to improve its efficiency. The implications are Gilfoyle-level exaggerated (to a degree), but it would render many forms of encryption useless until we developed something better - which would be hard...
@AntonVoyt
@AntonVoyt Год назад
1:03 Is the reason why I don't watch Western shows anymore. Thats not funny and there are ways to depict character traits less cringe.
@oknoobcom
@oknoobcom Год назад
I know what you mean
@karazakiakuno4645
@karazakiakuno4645 Год назад
Well well the thing is, those aren't just fictional characters anymore. People, especially of the west are like that.
@AntonVoyt
@AntonVoyt Год назад
Sucks for them I guess.
@opart
@opart Год назад
@@AntonVoyt don't generalize
@iansmart4158
@iansmart4158 Год назад
I don't understand. Do you just watch like Scandinavian shows? Or are you saying you only watch anime and K-dramas? Because a lot of that stuff is cringe as well.
@Stillreal312
@Stillreal312 6 месяцев назад
I f**king hate how condescending Richard talked to Gilfoy in this scene
@ediznecattopal
@ediznecattopal 7 месяцев назад
Artificial intelligence should apply a 3D laser that can travel with us.
@ediznecattopal
@ediznecattopal 7 месяцев назад
Of course, Artificial Intelligence can be a very good psychological counselor. They should be able to have knowledge about every subject, be able to store psychiatric memories, and at the same time, as I said, these should be installed on the watches of our mobile phones, like 3D lasers, and they should be able to walk around with us as friends.
@ediznecattopal
@ediznecattopal 7 месяцев назад
Artificial intelligence should apply a 3D laser that can travel with us. You should be able to turn it into a friend, its software and program should be in our mobile phone watches and this should be used in the education system.
Далее
The Ending Of Silicon Valley Explained
10:20
Просмотров 781 тыс.
Пиратские котики
00:50
Просмотров 144 тыс.
Nuclear waste is reusable. Why aren’t we doing it?
15:25
The Expert (Short Comedy Sketch)
7:35
Просмотров 31 млн
Career Spotlight: Sharvari Narendra
42:53
Просмотров 555
TJ Miller On Why He Left Silicon Valley
2:13
Просмотров 46 тыс.
Silicon Valley - "Scrum"
1:52
Просмотров 332 тыс.
Piers Morgan on Nigel Farage and Keir Starmer
11:11
Просмотров 326 тыс.
How One Line of Code Almost Blew Up the Internet
13:47