What Has The Government Been Hiding? 54 Years of Secrets & the Release of the JFK Records 

what is hate speech ???

@Katie Rae truth is hate speech

@@petperthecommenter3364Hate speech = Insultive verbiage coming from an uncivilized asshole who is unable to respect another person's point of view.

Did you see the Head shot on Z FILM? Do you believe it came from rear to front,, high to low,, from a. High Powered rifle,, Full metal jacketed projectile,, right to left,, HIGH VELOCITY,,over 2K ft per sec on impact at less that 70yrds? One single impact? If so,, Have you ever hunted? Fired a weapon? Do you have any ballistic experience? If your answere is yes for the first questions,, I can understand and ANSWER the last::: ABSOLUTELY NO PERSONAL HANDS ON KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE!! It's OK,, most just accept on faith anyway. Hope that's not hate Speech! Peace!

These Three Are Still Gonna Stick To The Oswald Is A World Class Sniper..& Ruby Was A Ligit Bussnissman. & There’s NO PROOF Oswald Attempted To Shoot ANYONE Else .. cause he didn’t. Fuckin liars 50 + years later.. & These Assholes Spewing THIER Bullsit.. ITS OFFENSIVE TO ME CAUSE ITS LIKE THEY THINK WERE ALL STUPID .. pisses me off HUGE

So the ones making the claim have the burden of proof. The ones saying Oswald acting alone have the burden. The Warren report is the first of a number of government responses. The HSCA and others all support each other (the HSCA had a last minute caveat that included acoustic evidence. But this was later debunked). So then conspiracy buffs (like I was for 30 years) are asked well then who did it? You then have the burden of proof. No CT has ever provided one document, fingerprint, name, confession (credible that is), pay-check etc. I know where you're coming from but all the suposed cover-ups and suspicions have plausible, simple explanations. Occam's Razor beheads the conspiracy movement

@@billkeon880 The doctors at Parkland Hospital who were the first to tend to JFK all said they saw a entry wound from the front & a bigger wound from the back, (indicating a exit wound. There's no conspiracy. Not to mention all the laws the feds broke that day in Dallas of which HAS BEEN PROVEN. And again, no conspiracy's there, either.

@@allancove4483 what you've got there is folklore. The hole in the upper back wasn't seen by the parkland doctors, though it was seen at the autopsy. Parkland doctors were busy trying to save his life. The four main doctors that were involved in life saving procedures on JFK (Perry, Carrico, Jenkins and Baxter - Carrico was the first) were first on the scene and now all agree that the wounds in JFK’s cranium were just as the autopsy doctors and the Warren report say. Even the anesthesiologist (who was sitting near the head) said the same thing. Carrico described the throat wound as a mildly ragged opening, not a neat, round hole of entry. That is more consistent of an exit wound. That was prior to the tracheotomy. There were some doctors who described a rear exit wound in the head like Crenshaw and McLelland, but these doctors were all junior residents or very young, inexperienced doctors. None of the doctors in the room were pathologists, let alone forensic pathologists (which is why autopsies are done). According to the 4 more senior (but still quite inexperienced) doctors working on JFK, no one did any investigation of the wounds since life saving was the priority. That also explains why none of them knew about the entry wound to the upper back. Jenkins and Carrico said that the way the bloody and shredded brain bits caked on JFK’s hair falling downward to the back of the head could give the impression that there was a rear wound. The whole story about ALL the doctors describing a rear exit wound is ridiculous for another reason - the body was lying supine (face up) and the rear of the head was in contact with the gurney - no one could see it. And they didn’t turn the body over to do an examination because after about 22 minutes of emotional, frantic life saving and pronouncing him deceased, they were not about to poke around with a post mortem exam with Jackie sitting just feet away. Can you imagine JFK lying on his back with a tracheotomy sticking out of his throat and doctors frantically performing constant CPR on him and then one of the doctors saying “stop this CPR, take the tracheotomy out because I want to check out the rear of his head to see if a wound is there”? And McClelland or none of the other doctors testified that they lifted Kennedy‘s head or turned him over to investigate further. They DID NOT see the back of his head, so their descriptions of an area in the back of the skull being blasted out is mistaken. That goes to show how good eye-witness reports are - they are not. The HSCA contained a total of 9 expert pathologists (some who were forensic pathologists) and ALL of them (including Cyril Wecht) concluded that the autopsy photos, x-rays, report and conclusions were correct and unaltered and not faked. They stated this categorically. The autopsy was good and they agreed with its conclusion UNANAMOUSLY - a single bullet went through both men shot from the rear, another shot from the rear hit the head and no shot came from the grassy knoll or anywhere else. The HSCA's Forensic Pathology Panel included Michael Baden, John I. Coe, Joseph H. Davis, George S. Loquvam, Charles S. Petty, Earl Rose, Werner Spitz, Cyril Wecht, and James T. Weston. With the benefit of authenticated photographs, x-rays and notes from the Kennedy autopsy, a nine-doctor panel of expert pathologists reviewed and corroborated the Warren Commission's medical findings. Although the HSCA medical panel was critical of the thoroughness and methodology of the original autopsy, they unanimously concurred with the previous analysis of the late president's wounds: the cause of death being two, and only two bullet wounds, both of which entered from above and behind (the direction of Oswald in the Book Depository).

@@billkeon880 I'm not going to argue or debate this as its been beaten way to death by so many people that its beyond ridiculous. Based on the reading & research I've done over the years, the doctors said what they said. They saw what they saw. The feds broke more laws that day, than I care to count. And had they allowed for the doctors to of perform the autopsy which by LAW they had 100% LEGAL JURISDICTION to do at the time, it would've ended even before it had a chance to start, any & all conspiracy's or speculations to begin with. So by the feds/government breaking the laws like they did, all that did, was it made them look all the more guilty than what they already were. So that said, you can believe in the fairytale spun by the government & you can keep drinking the Kool Aid kid, & you can continue being wrong while I know that I'm right. And this will be the last I post on this issue with you. So move along kid, & keep buying into the governments bullshit. Bye kid, oh, & enjoy that Kool Aid.

It's more simple. Ultimately nothing.

because it says what you don't like....

That’s what academics do, accumulating a multitude of superficial facts the implications of which they can’t see because there are no university classes on the (universal) principles that would be necessary to understand the history they think they are studying. They study higher subjects to be sure, History, Political Science, Literature, Philosophy, but still there is no Higher Education because “higher” is for them a prejudice belonging to the superstition Old World and they throw it out-though they secretly, like Carl Sagan, want to be thought of as wise men! They are incomplete. Thus they cannot see the forest for the trees which they organize endlessly without understand that the whole damn thing is on fire! I know this because I spent my life among these superficial ninnies. JWC

@@jayclark2077 LOL Exactly.right!!

Exactly. they even look like FBI agents

You bet!

They still are…

I thought it was "the whole bay of pigs thing".

He also said he didn't want to pick that scab (meaning JFK.)

@@terrikay4622 @datikit01; All of these attempted portrayals are full of conjecture, presumption, assumption, subjective, and distorted, purposely, intentionally. Certainly, those that directed, dictated, controlled, ordered the killing public execution, murder, assassination of JFK are still in control They selected JFK, RMN, LBJ, HHH, DDE, HST, FDR, STA, GRF, JEC, EdM, RR, GHWB, DQ, WJ&HC, AlG, GWB, RCh, BHO, JRB, DJT, etc. They also executed MLK, RFK, Malcom-X, LHO, WmMcK,AbL, and numerous others. The group are know by many names: "globalist/elite"/Committee of 300/Illuminati/BlackNobility/SocietyOfRome/SocietyOfCincinnati/ChapmanHouse/NWO/etc.-stem from Rome,through all, include all EuropeanRoyalty, Kennedy family were among the Elite in Ireland before immigrating to the USA in early 20th Century - first generation selected/elected into political office =>thus among them, selected, chosen, JosSr. Ambassador to England during FDR. The information about JFK, RFK, etc. will remain hidden, purposely, though the retained files, documents do not contain anything explicit, including the MI6 agents, and other executors. [See Dr. JohnColeman-ComitteeeOf300-fmrMI6&CIAoperative-published document(s)] JFK was a mebver of the Elite, selected, degenerate and executed as an example, along with MLK, RFK, WmMcKin, AbrLinc., etc. All The Best. Sincerely

@@badmanskill1112 operation Zapata.... Zapata was George Bush's Oil company illegally slant drilling into cuban territory. Powerful men took out their impediment known as JFK. I always felt Watergate was Nixon's paranoia. E. Howard Hunt and Frank Stugis seeking information on Nixon's opponent if they had dirt on the Big Event. E Howard Hunt on his death bed confessed to being a benchwarmer to JFK assignation.

Thank you for saving me from watching the whole video! We all know the CIA was involved with killing President Kennedy

Yeah I don't have time for lack of credibility

@@debbiedeets2947 No we don't all know that just you conspiracy nuts, show the proof that has merit.

@@leemoore9933 you probably still believe in the tooth fairy. Your parents withheld the proof of that, the CIA if involved must withhold proof if any exists. As such direct proof is scant. Proof still exists in non-direct ways, principally in human associations. Humans by our nature are incredibly adept at reconstructing these. While you conclude conspiracy nuts, the more correct conclusion is that conspiracy is very likely.

@@estban2065 Humans by nature have a very difficult time keeping secrets too.

100%agree with you!!!

they were silenced

Agreed. And they were conveniently ignored. It did not fit the narrative

No, they did not. Not one of them

​@@cobar5334they told them they were wrong

If he wanted power so bad why is he the only president to turn down a nomination think about what ur saying. You really think he wanted that Vietnam mess ? C'mon.

@@enlightenedwarrior7119 He wanted to stay out of prison! RFK was gonna put the SOB, along with Baker, Estes, and others behind bars...do you think LBJ and his backers were gonna go quietly?

@Ms Happy Apple; Motive and means, even combined with opportunity mean nothing, without evidence. There is no evidence that LBJ had anything to do with the JFK assassination.

Right On Ms. Apple, well said 🤜🤛

Brown lied a lot including the party the night before assassination.

Don't go. It just continues the cover-up.

.

EXACTLY the RIGHT QUESTION!

Because the government is trapped in a big lie and arrogant nerds who did not play sports do not know how to raise their arm and say "My bad."

Check out the Who Killed JFK podcast . Oswald was a Patsy and the Texas School Book Depository literally had nothing to do with the assassination.

The Warren Commission concluded that at approximately 1:15 p.m., Dallas Patrolman J. D. Tippit drove up in his patrol car alongside Oswald-presumably because Oswald resembled the police broadcast description of the man seen by witness Howard Brennan firing shots at the presidential motorcade. Patrolman Tippet’s encounter with Oswald occurred near the corner of East 10th Street and North Patton Avenue.[183][184] This location is about nine-tenths of a mile (1.4 km) southeast of Oswald’s rooming house-a distance that the Warren Commission concluded “Oswald could have easily walked.”[185] Tippit pulled alongside Oswald and “apparently exchanged words with [him] through the right front or vent window.” “Shortly after 1:15 p.m.”,[n 10] Tippit exited his car and was immediately struck and killed by four shots.Numerous witnesses heard the shots and saw Oswald flee the scene holding a revolver; nine positively identified him as the man who shot Tippit and fled.[188][n 11] Four cartridge cases found at the scene were identified by expert witnesses[189] before the Warren Commission and the House Select Committee as having been fired from the revolver later found in Oswald’s possession, to the exclusion of all other weapons. However, the bullets taken from Tippit’s body could not be positively identified as having been fired from Oswald’s revolver as the bullets were too extensively damaged to make conclusive assessments. . . . . *Oswald was in the Texas Theater at the time Tippit was killed.* None of the so-called ‘witnesses’ who supposedly ID’d Oswald actually did. Many of these witnesses had obviously been coached. And they still went off script during official questioning. The bullets taken from Tippit could not be tied to the pistol that Oswald is said to have when arrested at the theater. *Oswald's pistol was incapable of firing a bullet, the firing pin was broken.* The question remains. who actually had that revolver before the scuffle in the theater? It is highly likely that the entire scuffle scene was staged to plant that pistol on Oswald. Remember that gun could not be fired in the condition it was “found” in.

@@williamwhitten7820 Bill…. What I always say is that nothing, absolutely nothing is as it appears to be. And, that there is no one answer for anything. Thanks for your summary. It was very interesting.

*David Atlee Philips finally said that Oswald was never in Mexico City.*

@@williamwhitten7820 where are you getting these details? If you're dismissing facts because an 'authority' agency investigated and found the facts, and you dismiss them because you can't trust authority figures, then you need to re-evaluate your logic as well as past history. This is the same thing anti-evolutionists do... try to poke holes in the theory of evolution not knowing that tons of evidence from independent sources corroborate the theory. LHO could have made the walk to where Tippit was killed. LHO was walking toward Tippits car and suddenly reversed direction back where he came according to the witness driving the pick-up truck. That's why Tippit stopped him, as well as fitting the general description. LHO - consciousness of guilt. The shoe store citing and Texas theatre were after Tippit got shot. Read Dale Myers exhaustive book about the whole Tippit killing. Also read the HSCA and re-read the WC

@@billkeon880 I am getting many of these details from Jim Douglass’ *JFK and the Unspeakable* The following truth-telling of Butch Burroughs, Bernard Haire, T. F. White, Wes Wise, Robert G. Vinson, and Ralph Leon Yates allows us to peel back layers of obfuscation and unspeakable deception that have been directed at this country’s people for fifty years about why their beloved President was murdered by elements of U.S. national security state personnel that evermore direct the affairs of this corporate empire state. Peace is possible and can manifest when we are willing to see and acknowledge the unspeakable.

asking a question...have you read the Warren Report, HSCA report or Bugliosi's book. Most conspiracy buffs like I was haven't read any of them.

@@billkeon880 Read JFK And The Unspeakable, Crossfire, or The Man Who Knew Too Much. Odds Oswald Acted Alone... Less Than Zero.

@@vernpascal1531 I’ve owned those books for years and read them. Bought Marrs back in the mid 1980s and read Crossfire about 4 or 5 times cover to cover. I believed a conspiracy from about 1985/6 and my thoughts were confirmed with Stone’s movie JFK which I saw in the theatre three times in the first month of release. I’ve watched it a dozen times on my expanded edition DVD. I also bought The Men Who Killed Kennedy documentary DVD and have watched it near ten times. I own and have read 25 conspiracy books including Mark Land (2 by him), Garrison, Waldron and Hartmann (2), Fiester, Hassan, North, McClennan, Baker, North, Russell etc etc. I also own about 40 or more books on the CIAs dirty tricks, black ops in other countries, Cointelpro etc. These things have been proven and many admitted. I believed and was neck deep in JFK conspiracy theories for 30 years until 2016. I always said, like the good scientist I am, that if better evidence were presented to show I’m wrong, I would change my mind. But in those thirty years, not once did I pick up a book by the opposing side. Partly because all I heard from the conspiracy community was insults about what the other side put forward as evidence even though I had no inside knowledge to verify that. I was also afraid it might puncture the balloon of conspiracy. I finally bought two anti-conspiracy books, and along with some background science the conspiracy story was blown out of the water. I could go into Jim Marrs and Stone and write a novel. But body of evidence on the conspiracy side comes from either ‘unknowns’ or eye-witness testimony and memory. 1: Conspiracy advocates first have to say to themselves, if the evidence shows no conspiracy, I will follow the evidence. That’s what science does. If you can’t say this to yourself then you are in a religion. I was in there. 2: conspiracy buffs have to honestly look at the evidence that’s come out in the last dozen years or so about how appallingly bad eye-witness testimony and memory is. Check out Elizabeth Loftus’ work on RU-vid and research papers. She’s the leading researcher in this field in psychology. Please reply if you want more dialogue. I like discussion.

@@billkeon880 Take a good look at the holes in JFK's shirt and coat( Palamara's New Book Honest Answers). What is quickly apparent is there is no way a bullet entering 5 inches below on the collar goes out above the front Collar, and necktie.Also both Federal Agents at Autopsy, and both Autopsy Assistants said bullet did not go through the Pleura and exit out throat.

@@vernpascal1531 take a good look at the limo pictures in the parade that day. Just google Dallas Morning News photographs JFK. There are plenty of still photos and you will learn two crucial things. One (to answer the clothing question), JFK's coat and shirt were riding up his back. We've all done this. You get into a vehicle wearing a suit and as you sit, the suit slides up your back and pulls out of your waist. It's clearly seen in the pictures. If the clothes are higher when the bullet enters the body, the holes then appear to be lower when you take them off. Simple. When the clothes were examined, the fibles of the upper back hole were pointing inward toward the body, and the shirt and tie fibres were pointing out away from his neck indicating exit. The clothes are less relevant however, than the holes in the body. The second MAJOR thing you observe from the limo photos is that JFK was slid far to the right of the nack seat up against the edge of the car while Connelly was about 6-8 inches inboard on the jump-seat. That's a clear LIE Oliver Stone put in his movie. He would have known the truth by looking at the photos, so I can't give the benefit of doubt to one of my favourite filmakkers of all time. HE LIED on purpose. About the autopsy... it's nice that the others in the room including the FBI agents were board certified doctors or pathologists. Very talented people. Whatever they had to say is irrelevant. The subsequent HSCA contained a total of 9 expert pathologists (some who were forensic pathologists) and ALL of them (including Cyril Wecht) concluded that the autopsy photos, x-rays, report and conclusions were correct and unaltered and not faked. They stated this categorically. The autopsy was good and they agreed with its conclusion UNANAMOUSLY - a single bullet went through both men shot from the rear, another shot from the rear hit the head and no shot came from the grassy knoll or anywhere else. The HSCA's Forensic Pathology Panel included Michael Baden, John I. Coe, Joseph H. Davis, George S. Loquvam, Charles S. Petty, Earl Rose, Werner Spitz, Cyril Wecht, and James T. Weston. With the benefit of authenticated photographs, x-rays and notes from the Kennedy autopsy, a nine-doctor panel of expert pathologists reviewed and corroborated the Warren Commission's medical findings. Although the HSCA medical panel was critical of the thoroughness and methodology of the original autopsy, they unanimously concurred with the previous analysis of the late president's wounds: the cause of death being two, and only two bullet wounds, both of which entered from above and behind (the direction of Oswald in the Book Depository). It was Jackie who decided to take JFK to Bethesda while on Air Force One flying to Washington. There were a number of options open for the autopsy. If a conspiracy existed, they would have to plant conspiracy doctors in at least 3 possible military hospitals just in case Jackie decided on a different hospital, let alone the hundreds of other civilian hospitals that Jackie could have chosen instead - how likely is that? If you argue that ok, the autopsy doctors in Bethesda were not planted or coerced by conspirators, but there was pre-autopsy surgery on the plane or elsewhere before arriving at Bethesda you have to contend with two disqualifying facts: 1) there was no period of time the body was left alone with anyone other than Jackie or the closest and most loyal secret service staff of JFK’s detail until it was delivered to the autopsy site. 2) surgery on a dead body is very easy to be detected by autopsy doctors. Injury or surgery on a living person creates tell-tale clotting around the edges of tissue disturbance, while a dead person doesn’t leave this sign. Lifton’s case is thrown out on this one fact. Why did a few hospital personnel have differing accounts of the body or casket? - human fallibility and the well known fact in psychology of the poor quality of eye-witness accounts, especially years later when published suspicions of a conspiracy start percolating in the media. None of these ‘witnesses’ testified or revealed these ‘facts’ that contradicted the Warren report until years, even decades after its release. Besides, the ridiculous claim of pre-autopsy surgery came about because of ignorance of the facts surrounding the autopsy and conspiracists attempt to explain the supposed mystery.

Totally agree. These guys are fake, phony bastards because they know the real facts and still spread nonsense narratives.

I believe Dr. Wecht. His comments about who was chosen to perform this historic autopsy are priceless. And why didn't the autopsy doctors dissect the bullets' tracks? This is standard procedure.

Exactly...these warren commission apologists have ruled the day long enough...i dont know how they can even sleep at night

I could care less. The Kennedy's had enemies back to Old Joe's bootlegging. It's a shame, of course, but done and done...

no kidding - Hold the line Patriots. These bitches in the CIA need to go to directly to jail, do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

Are they not pathetic shills for establishment?.

Are you the 4th?

@@johnd7435 FUJD

He did mention the CIA

He did mention the CIA

Malone Donnie You're a fucking idiot!

Absolutely and that idea is one of the most credible

@@saparisrael2422 What was said about the CIA? I don't want to watch/listen to an hour and a half to find out. James Sutton's confession was enough for me. At least his confession makes complete sense---unlike the coverup stories.

thats because the american mainstream media is the CIA media

Long long ago. Yet still biased.

Governments lie every day. Bureaucratic screwups play a much larger role than imagined but there are malicious actors too

The bullet and fragments were matched ballistically to Oswald's rifle on the 6th floor. The 'missile' that stuck Kennedy could ONLY have come from the Depository building, due to the position of the limo on Elm St., and the position of JFK's body and head in the car, both parallel to the limo, body slouched slightly forward, head tilted downwards. The head wound could not have been caused by a bullet from the knoll or the bridge, or anywhere other than the 6th floor. Four and a half years later in May 1968, while campaigning in San Francisco for the California primary, Robert Kennedy can be seen standing in a open convertible, being held by campaign aides from falling out, while he is shaking hands with well-wishers and supporters. I'm sure his security detail cautioned him that he was at potential risk, but that's the way it was back in that time.

@@jamesanthony5681 We will agree to disagree. That's what they told you. I just don't believe them and there were people within our government and within the mafia that had reasons they wanted Kennedy gone. No way I will ever believe the Warren report that had too many of these same people assembled on the Commission.

Yeah it's the one case where the conspiracy was so large and from the highest level that you will never be able to fathom. One thing I know is that just when you think you got it figured out a whole bunch of new suspects appear...

I feel the same. I had been playing cricket in Australia. I remember mum later exclaiming "They got him" referring to Oswald. Later I became very interested in the subject and became more and more convinced that Oswald was indeed, a patsy. Some much time has passed that the conspirators are likely to have all died by now. The covered any possible 'leaks' with rather a lot of 'suicides' The conspirators were smart enough to make sure that any future revelation by released documents will NOT change anything

@@cobar5334 I am going to die almost 82 years old and I am no to know the real bad, very bad people that kill President Kennedy and many others. I hope the story about The Inferno it is true and waiting for those big assassins.

Allen Dulles. LBJ. George HW Bush and Hoover were main players in setting it up.

@@cobar5334 unless they missed something.

Not true

Show me a photo of Oswald. It doesn't exist. Even Hoover admitted that of the 20 photos they had of "Oswald" at the Soviet and Cuban Embassies not one of them was Oswald. But that is not the worst part. The Fake Oswald was using a fake Oswald I.D. to APPLY FOR A VISA! That is how deep the CIA Cover-up and frame of Oswald went.@@TELEVISIONARCHIVES

Wrong...

@@D1TemplarKnight And yet you cannot provide the photo, but why would that surprise me? Even Hoover could not provide one in the 20 photos taken that was Oswald. So in reality what we have is a fake Oswald who applied for a Visa using Oswald's I.D. (That is not the first time Oswald's I.D. has been used fraudulently.)

Great point. CIA was checking his mail but no security footage of him at the American Embassy in Mexico City; no flight logs, etc. No evidence Oswald went to Mexico City.

I visited the place in 1993. I asked some tough questions , they told me to leave. One of my proudest moments.

@@larrywheeler9917 I’m intrigued.... what questions did you ask? I watched 6th Floor Museum video with Dr Cyril Wecht, well worth viewing.

@@larrywheeler9917 Yeah, knowing you, the "tough questions" you asked must have been those like: "Where's that storm drain out of which reptilian shape-shifters dispatched JFK with 'Remington' .222 fireball weaponry?"

:). The word “ex-plain” means to flatten out, ie., to explain away! To me the idea that there are still all these forces put to work to conventionalize the official explanation of the murder of our president is what is truly astonishing and a blatant admission of guilt. JWC

@@apointofinterest8574 you don't know him; but we know who you are.

Dont think there are records saved by the conspirators that would directly imply they were guilty unless they wanted to boast or defend themselves of what they did was for the benifit of the good of the country. Johnson, Hoover, Dulles and others that benifited from the assassination in one way or another. Not all got away with it. Johnson, Nixon and Reagan as well as Mayor Yorty, and Agent Kellerman, all died on days the Kennedy's were assassinated as they themselves must have, 22nd and the 5th.

You read too many CT books.

@@peterfraser9070 CT books mean Critical Thinking books... Nowadays we know the truth...so your CIA coined phrase given to describe Mark Lane...is long gone..they are now Conspiracy Facts!

@@bradrook3919 What facts? Which ones - all of them?? @ Oswalds, 2 rifles found? This is what I'm talking about; you are so hazy about what your CT even is. If someone says "back and to the left" is proof of s front shot, that's the most embarrassingly simple-minded thing ever. The Z Film shows 'forward' first, and 'up and forward' skull pieces above the head. Citing a lower bullet hole in the jacket and shirt is cringeworthy; they were bunched up, so they actually PROVE a higher base of the neck entry. You don't get to ignore these things and just blab about "assets" and "ops". Nothing has changed theft that the 2 bullets that hit those men came from Oswald's rifle and the mountain of evidence puts him in that window firing the rifle. You are making a common mistake: thinking an over-abundance of stories and believers proves something's true. Facts and evidence prove something is true - and you simply don't have it on your side.

@@peterfraser9070 your mountain of evidence is nothing more than lies that have long been found uncredible and debunked.. Victoria Adams asked David Belin to be included in the Warren Commission time trials as to Oswald escaping the sixth floor...he refused...she then told him to speak with Sandra Styles or Elsie Dorman as to when she left the fourth floor...but one can't have corroborating witnesses, so he again refused...this whole case is filled with the WC disallowing anybody who saw different other than their pre-determined theory.. Fact Oswald was in the 2nd floor lunchroom... Fact: The investigation of Tippit the Sargent in charge found 38. Shell casings at the scene...this is in Chief Curry's book.. Fact: Oswald never ordered a Carcano from Klines Sporting Goods..no Bank endorsements of all 4 bank institutions needed to deposit it into the first national bank of Chicago... No one disputes shots from the rear...but the Fact that the M/C cop which was behind and to the left of Jack was splattered with Brain matter.. Jackie retrieved part of his brain from back and to the left on the trunk.. Researchers have all Facts...your probably a Vincent Bugliosi fan...keep in mind he's an attorney that's trying to win over a case...he's Not interested in the truth...he's a lawyer that sells books with over 1600 pages in it...James DiEugenio destroys all in his book with Documents Leavelle said it best..if this case goes to trial...we just don't have enough evidence to convict...

Much of the contribution of the conspiracy crowd distorts or even lies about the facts.

unbelievable is it not? These guys must be funded by the CIA

I saw Oliver Stone's JFK at 8 yrs old and was traumatized. I believed there was a mass conspiracy and it bothered me. It seemed to me that the "Oswald did it all by himself" theory was the great minority. I decided to research and read books that argue that case because I genuinely wanted to know the truth even if it went against what I always believed. I read and seen every conspiracy theory in documentaries. I wanted to consider the possibility that he did do it alone. After reading "Reclaiming History" by Vincent Bugliosi and "Case Closed" by Gerald Posner I came to the conclusion that Oswald did it alone. All the other conspiracys were just that, failed plots that were not connected with Lee Harvey Oswald's lone plot.

You put your faith in Oliver Stone and Hollywood.....among others...and this is why YOU can never be trusted with the truth..

Just the facts alone, that jfk was clearly shot by shooters from the front and not by Oswald who was behind him.. his skull blew out on to the back of the limo. The gaping wound in back clearly indicated that was the EXIT of the bullet

Draft

Geoffrey Johnstone you are right. It was no accident that nearly all of the autopsy team at Bethesda was military. They follow orders.

México City serves as the perfect example of the use of disinformation and withholding key evidence. There was film footage from the Soviet embassy in Mexico City. Where is that? And, some say there is a photo of LHO at Mexico City. Where is that photo? Some say they have seen that photo.

No witness saw Oswald in lunch room at actual time of assassination. He was seen there before and after by different people but not at time if assassination. How did so many keep a secret/conspiracy for so long with mo leaks.?. Easily, because there was no conspiracy. Sometimes, shit just happens. There isn't always dark forces working in the shadows for every tragic event

Since there has been the creation of the “ Freedom of Information Act” we are now able to see how the CIA classifies different murders that they are involved in.. and I know that there are government shills that are going to say, the CIA only gathers Intelligence... that’s what their charter says they do - and everyone knows that they (CIA) only follow their own guidelines... You are now able to see what criteria is followed by the CIA when they are involved in murders....There are three(3) classifications that are followed:::: The murder is first classified as Open or Secret....In the Kennedy Case, it would’ve been classified as Open...no hiding or denying what was trying to be accomplished... Secret would be putting poison in a drink or food or putting chemicals into your cologne bottle to induce a heart attack....where an autopsy wouldn’t necessarily point to murder.... Next up it would be classified as GUARDED or SIMPLE... That is pertaining to whether the target has security protection or not... So the assassination would be classified as guarded...and lastly and probably the MOST important... It is classified as SAFE or LOST.... and in the Kennedy assassination is where it gets tricky because it is classified as Guarded-Open-Lost... and GUARDED-OPEN-SAFE... Lee Oswald was not supposed to be alive to be arrested... And Jack Ruby was not the one that was supposed to kill him... Jack’s name was never supposed to be known to anyone in America in reference to this murder

LHO was the lone gunman all the eveidence proves this, he killed Tippet because he thought Tippet would have frisked him and found the pistol, the man just killed the President killing a cop was nothing to him at that point, he tried killing another in the theatre. Stick with the facts they will set you free. Their were witness to this and a witness seem him toss his jacket under a care before heading into the movie house. How much damm guilt do you need. Oh he was a patsy, patsy my ass!

Jeff Epstein was killed by Jack Ruby

And possibly dorothy killgallen who was investigating and questioned Jack ruby.

MSM panel. I might as well be watching CNN to some kind of truth. They're peddeling BS books.

Edward Pike Exactly!🇺🇸Same Difference🇺🇸

you're a fucking moron. You probably mean your diaper needs changing. Dipshit.

ted carriker As it should be🇺🇸

@@MrKmanthie ... I think you meant "No Name".. coward.

Can you please clarify. Thanks.

Mine broke under the weight of the horseshit presented here.

@Mangili Ngarlu: You're recirculating one of the numerous lies of Mark Lane. Shame be upon you.

And he had a revolver with a crooked firing pin that wouldn't fire when he tried to shoot it in the Texas Theater.

Sabato is terrible. He makes me sick. Excuse me I have to throw up.

“Perhaps that smoking gun may yet exist; God knows there are enough dogged assassination researchers out there to find it if it does. But, so far, the documents seem to confirm the wisest twin conclusions about the J.F.K. assassination: Oswald was guilty, and acted alone; and, at the same time, the intelligence services-the F.B.I., the C.I.A., and the rest-were up to their armpits in bad acts that they were trying to keep concealed. These conclusions, as I wrote on the fiftieth anniversary of the assassination, point to two more: that the Warren Commission is almost certainly the only plausible account of what happened on that day in Dallas, and that the underlife of the government was more sinister, or at least more complicit in guilty knowledge, than the image makers of the time, and the Kennedys, wanted to accept or to publicize.” -Adam Gopnik The New Yorker

@@jackgriffin4893 There's ZERO CHANCE OSWALD ACTED ALONE! TOO RIDICULOUS FOR WORDS..SO DOZENS AND DOZENS OF WITNESSES ARE WRONG AND COINCIDENCES ALL GO ONE WAY?

I know. It's business as usual.

John @JJKPerformance njwammqqk

Bull low knee

Read Bugliosi's book or listen to him interviewed about it on RU-vid.

Dude. JFK was shot in 5 directions by the best hit ‘‘em in the world. JFK’s limo was flown to Detroit the next day and shredded, the zapuder film to Kodak in Rochester Ny and doctored over the weekend. Either your gross nerd or woefully inept on researching JFK valid information.

Politically connected mobster. A Johnson man.

Yeah I'd say so. It's really sad to see the Establishment media try and swallow greased bowling ball after greased bowling ball.

Not to mention the simple fact that if it was a simple "lone nut" then what could possibly be the risk to national security by releasing the files?

try not to make children if you are this stupid....

7. @@76reliant

I agree

Don't squander time with museum.

That building was owned by someone sketchy too. I think he was an oilman. Without JFK around LBJ brought us into Vietnam. JFK was going to get everyone (meaning the advisor spooks that were there because we had no troops there at that time. Wars run on oil. Follow the 💰 money.

Total government BS.

and even if Oswald was a lone gunman (which he wasnt) that still does not mean there wasnt a conspiracy behind JFKs murder.......i think the CIA's refusal after 60 yrs to release their full files can be interpreted as an admission of guilt

I heard this gentleman talking and it steal don’t make sense why not allow the Odense ask questions?

Aka cover up.

@@terrikay4622: The language is ironic, eh? The "coverup" leaves the wound un-covered, open, so that it can only fester and never heal. The wound is hidden instead of healed. This is the fallacy of Ford's pardon of Nixon. Justice is supposed to operate as the cultural surgeon and healer--but obviously it hasn't "operated" as it is supposed to for a very long time. What Ford did was unforgivable--thought the media got in line to declare it in the nation's interest and "courageous" into the bargain! Jesus! Of course Electron's comment is not wrong but just pointing out one of the psychological mechanisms that keeps us asleep or helps to keep us pacified. People say they "want to get on with life," but the wounded bleeding man cannot do that; he can't even walk, and may die of it (as our Republic has been slowly dying since the assassination and is now perhaps already dead from a thousand similar cuts), and certainly cannot "get on with life!" JWC

You don't believe that a bullet can enter and exit from behind?

@@bluesky6985 i believe that bullets can enter, & exit from the rear, tho not @ the same time! Executions are carried out like that all the time! But I don't think JFK was assassinated by Oswald or shot from behind like they've been telling us for the past 59yrs. There's not a person on the planet who could pull off the shots they claim Oswald did! #1 criteria for a conspiracy to survive== it has to be believable! Same concept for 'president' biden- his election was bogus, faked, stolen, cheated, whatever other words you want to use!

@@raystanley4329 The trajectory was perfect for the storm drain shooter though. That's where the head shot came from

In (OUR)grovenment the laws of physics do not apply.

@@raystanley4329 after he Biden was proclaimed. WINNER I KNEW U S A WAS HISTORY!!!

I've never heard that before. Are you sure with the International Time Change? The one reason that I've thought about a lot lately, that is among the top 5, or 6, why JFK was killed I think is a NATO Connection.

Joseph, u have provided the best clue ever! Its now straight forward solved case. Let the public revisit the log of calls an hour before the assassination. Who placed the marines in Germany on alert? From where was the cable sent? How many units or battalions world over were placed on high alert? Who was responsible for assigning secret service protection to JFK?

Was it the 56th Field Artillery unit?

Yes I have head that before, along with the news paper accounts in the South Pacific that came out before the event

@@jeandixson5610 That' s what Fletcher Prouty aka Mr. X told. He was on a mission to the south pole and on his way back he has read the whole story in a local New Zealand paper. Don' t forget the time difference USA-New Zealand.

Lucas Timouri I tend to agree with that thinking. Plus, LHO would have had a passport and hundreds of dollars. And, you don't "sneak in to" the theatre without paying.

Lucas Timouri nothing makes sense. He was probably ordered by his "handler" to meet at the movie theatre. Why he sneaked in????? And, if headed for the border, he would have had two or three passports on him and a lot of cash.

Lucas Timouri How come L H O did not have a car?

Lucas Timouri and, to get to the border requires money of which he had very little. And, had he taken that taxi ride, as intended, he would have had even less. Then, what is he to do in Mexico "peso-less?" Someone planning an escape has a lot of $$$$ on their person along with two or three passports.

Howard Crowe LHO was learning to drive and did not yet drive.

I have a friend who works as a manager of people. She says, “ If it looks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it walks like a duck....”

EXACTLY

You're wrong on all these accounts. Very very wrong. I do know about the rifle and LHO shooting ability, I served in the Marine Corps in the 70's for 4 yrs so I can speak as an expert to this anyway, LHO was a sharpshooter thats the badge he qualified in bootcamp thats a pretty decent badge by USMC standards, we had to shoot at 200, 300 and 500 yards in bootcamp from various shooting positions, so a Marine with a scoped rifle with his skills could have easily pulled off an 87 yard (3) shots with 2 hits in 8 seconds, besides the facts all prove this. Oh the badge order USMC lowest to highest~~Marksman, Sharpshooter (LHO) and the highest Expert. Any Marine by an 87 yard shot would IMO be an excellent shoot.

The 'magic' bullet would have to have gone SEVEN different ways to cause all the damage it did, impossible.

@@johnclegg4993 Everything lined up in a straight line the bullet wasn't magic.Try other sources other then the movie JFK it was fiction made in Hollywood.

He got paid to work. He worked staging his profile of the lone commie nut connected to Castro. He was moved around like a chess piece. Then killed.

Read Pricilla Johnson and also Norman Mailer’s books on Oswald. Very in-depth on virtually every day of his life from 1959 until his death. There you will find your answers, including the USSR piece. Travelling to these places was not hard or expensive, especially Mexico City. He took a bus that cost him peanuts

Mob, connection , just like Jack Ruby , killed him , to shut- him up , so he wouldn't implicate , Carlos Maecello , head of the Texas Mafia.

R.R workers nuff said.

@@sticks0012 Sam Holland was standing on the triple overpass and said he saw smoke and thought the shots and smoke came from the grassy knoll. But he was not sure the smoke came from the gun when he gave his testimony. He also testified that a secret service agent inside the car jumped up with a machine gun when JFK got hit in the head. So not extremely reliable account. Author EJ Epstein also asserts three other triple overpass witnesses also report smoke coming from the grassy knoll, insinuating rifle fire. However, this author was selective in his description - one of them; James Simmons actually thought the shots came from the TSBD and the ‘smoke’ was exhaust fumes. Clem Johnson reported the smoke as coming from a motorcycle and Austin Miller thought it was steam. In 1963 there was a steam pipe on the knoll embankment. Also, modern 20th century rifles rarely, if ever, give off smoke, let alone enough to hover over the area. The assassin didn’t use a musket. Besides on the morning of Nov 22 and during the parade, there was a moderate headwind of 5-20 MPH blowing north to south that the limo was driving into head-on. A puff of smoke wouldn’t hover. This headwind also explains why some of the motorcycle cops got some blood on them trailing the limo, though frame 313 of the Z film shows a forward explosion of blood strong enough to go forward into the headwind. The best Lee Bowers could do was say there was a commotion of some sort, but he could not be more explicit. There was a commotion. JFK was shot.

Source? Bet you don't have one

Meh... the shots coming from the depository is plausible. The wounds are plausible. Oswald trying to assassinate a 2nd public figure after Gen. Walker is plausible. Is it possible some mystery person took the shot from the window, yes. But it's also totally possible Oswald did as well.

You make a startlingly obvious point that I've not heard here my friend. Away from the hubbub of Dealy Plaza...out in the wilds of Oak Cliff...on an ordinary day Tippitt and LHO have very little chance of even crossing paths let alone having a shootout in the middle of the street. With upwards of 30% still clinging to the Warren Commission Fantasy we must continue to pile up the evidence before we can make our case. "It may be too late for justice but its never too late for the truth."

@@bribos99 The truth in this whole affair may never be revealed in an open and honest way , The power structure that orcastrated the assassination also controlled the media in a way that the news wasn't impartial it was bias and the tone with narrative sold the lone gun LHO never stood a chance within an hour every law man was looking for LHO his name was in NZ NEWS papers the following day . I know the truth . it sux but at least I'm not blind I have a mind and it works to my program not some hopeful gov that can't even lie they would have to prove it was LHO they never could they never would that's enough for me

@@DoBraveryFPS Possible is a universe away from plausible. Oswald didn't kill anybody.

@@williamwhitten7820 Yes, Oswald never shot anybody. He was ***The Falling Guy***

also was being tracked by CIA and KGB....from books I have read.

Whether she saw Oswald or not that is peanuts compared to the evidence we have on many domestic suspects..some at the very high level..

Exactly. Transcripts or it didn’t happen.

@@StephenZ827 If the books you have read were "tracked," we'd find they're all properly classified, as fiction.

@@apointofinterest8574 Books I have read and heard the author say...the Secret Service did it by accident. There is likely 100 different versions of how and by whom. Don't get your ass in a twist over it. According to one book, the photo of a man in Mexico, was in fact ( according to the author ) was the KGB guy tracking LHO. The photo taken by a CIA agent or likely one of the shooters ( to be ) He was tracking LHO, to have a photo of him in or near Russian Embassy, which would later be leaked to FBI, or what would become Warren Commission. Was the KGB following LHO to determine if he were a double agent. Why would they need to follow him, did they know of a plot to kill JFK and LHO was part of the opt. ????

The premise of a single assassin shooting and killing JFK is *CERTAINLY* viable. A bullet entering the forehead from the right front is *NOT* possible. And I'm surprised that you fell for that. You conspiracy folks keep mentioning physics and momentum and 'back and to the left', while completely ignoring mathematics, specifically geometry, and the angle and trajectory of an incoming bullet in relation to the President's head AND the wound that he suffered. Mathematics is more important. It's NOT possible that there was a 2nd shooter, i.e., from the knoll, bridge, sewer, or whatever. Examine the Z film closely. Read up on the head wound. Come to your own conclusions.

The right shoulder wound bullet fell out on an exam table when X-ray technician Jerrol Custer was moving JFK's body around for X-rays. It has nothing to do with the neck wound. Details below. Jim Jenkins was at the same Bethesda autopsy and helped Dr. Boswell remove JFK's lungs and heart. They sat the corpse up on another exam table and found the bullet had only penetrated about an inch and a half, not even penetrating the pleural membrane around JFK's right lung. See the Jim Jenkins interview in Valuetainment for example. Again, the bullet into the shoulder had nothing to do with JFK's throat or neck area. Here is how the shots fell: (1) Zapruder frame 155-- a signal shot with pyrotechnic color sparks was fired into the pavement (left rear of limo) to signal all shooting teams the assassination was a go. Notice how the front left tire is abnormally thick on the yellow car-- poor retouching of this frame. JFK heard the shot and glanced left, then put his head back forward without worry. This head turn is censored out of the Zapruder film. (2) Z206-- JFK is shot in the shoulder, behind the sign, and exclaims (heard by SS Agent Kellerman) "My God! I am hit!" so we know his vocal chords were still intact as in he was not shot in the throat yet. The purpose of this shallow underpowered shot (prepared by Chauncey Holt at the CIA specialty arms shop in Goleta, Calif., near the airport) was to get JFK to flinch up and hold his head high, above the windshield. The same is done by Saudi sword executioners-- they prod their victims in the shoulder with a sword tip to get them to arch up and extend their necks. In Saudi Arabia, it's to make it easier to do a neck chop. For JFK, it was to get him to raise his head high for the next shot. We know from Jim Jenkins's eyewitness reports that the bullet came down at an angle from the high rear. Assassin angle #1. (3) Z222-- JFK is shot in the throat by mistake, from the front left (details to follow). Count the frames, times 0.055 seconds per frame, from Z216 to Z222. The two shots were 0.088 seconds apart. The fastest the Mannlicher-Carcano bolt can be cycled is two seconds, plus aiming time. It is physically impossible for one person to make both shots, not to mention that the Z206 shot was from behind and the Z222 shot was from the rear which proves two shooters already. Look at Willis photo #5 and you will see the traffic sign that covers JFK between Z206 and Z222 didn't cover JFK in the real world = the genuine Willis #5 photo. You can see Zapruder's lens line of sight went UNDER the sign, i.e. Zapruder's camera saw JFK and his car go under the sign. Also, from Zapruder's pedestal, the traffic sign could only cover about a third of JFK's limo at one time. But in the faked Zapruder frames you can see 99% of the limo covered top to bottom and left to right. This was to conceal the close timing of the two shots and hide their origins. The throat shot first went through the limo windshield a little to the driver's left of the rearview mirror. Backtrack the angle from the throat back out the windshield hole and you see the shot came from the southern grassy knoll, where Tosh Plumlee was close enough to hear the shot made and he even smelled the gun smoke. Obviously the shot was not intended to go through the windshield but it dropped low. Probably due to silencer problems (stretched lumen from prior firing with 7.62x39 ammo which is cheap and of variable diameter, whereas higher quality 7.62x51 ammo would be more likely used for a professional hit). A stretched silencer bore or lumen would mean a quality .308 = 7.62x51 shot would be artificially and unexpectedly underpowered due to lost blowby gases. The shooter was a professional and right on target for centering his shot, but it must have been a mechanical problem that dropped the shot low from JFK's head into his throat. We know from Evalea Glanges and George Whitaker (Ford employee) that the hole was there, conically from front to back. Windshield expert Whitaker knows the original was destroyed to hide evidence, and two replacements were made. One windshield to repair the limo, and the second windshield as a fake for the museum, with a phony crack inserted in place of the destroyed-evidence hole-- to hide the fact this shot was from the front. Notice a shot from the southern grassy knoll at Z222 lines JFK's head up with the book depository. This shot was likely intended to be the final headblaster finishing shot. The autopsy fakers at Bethesda could then enlarge the entrance to make it look like an exit wound (with the true exit lined up with the book depository as if that had been the origin), and then that would have met the conspiracy's needs. But fate intervened. Further, notice that in Willis photo #5 we see Umbrella Man was really standing on the Zapruder side of the sign (in back of the sign's rear) and about 10 feet away from it. In the faking done for the Zapruder forgery, Umbrella Man is supposedly standing alongside the sign and on the other (frontside = street side) of the sign. Once Umbrella Man could see JFK's head was not blasted to hamburger yet, he jerked his sign up and down to signal downhill for more shots. Notice also that in Zapruder frame Z220 the upper right corner of the sign is cut a little blunt from botched cutting and pasting of the grotesquely enlarged sign. In the other frames the upper right of the sign has a more carefully cut rounded corner. Notice in Zapruder that the jerking of the umbrella has been censored out. JFK is still alert and sitting upright with raised hands and arms, in pain until Z250 when he was rendered unconscious. Jackie had by this time seen his left elbow fly up (she couldn't see his right arm) and was tending to him to try to figure out what his problem was. Between Z222-Z255 (1.8 seconds) he had a quizzical look on his face and could only make gurgling noises. Jackie heard zero shots the entire time due to motorcycle noise at her immediate left rear. Parts 4-7 follow in another posting. .

(4) Z250-- JFK was hit from the rear with a horizontal shot (not steep high rear as in the Z206 shoulder shot. We now have three shooters) an inch to the right of the external occipital protuberance and up a quarter inch. This is known from Dr. David Mantik's examination of photos from the Harper Fragment of JFK's skull. We know from Dr. Boswell's notes that this bullet ended up between JFK's vomer bone (rear of the nose) and his right eye orbit. This instantly obliterated JFK's consciousness, and you can see his hands then arms start to drop away in subsequent frames. See Costella Combined Edit for example. He is hemmed in by the car and by Jackie, but despite those constraints you can see he is developing what neurologists call decorticate posturing-- due to the serious brain damage. Extravasated blood is starting to pool inside the right half of his skull. (5) Z290-- JFK is shot through the right forehead above the right eye at the hairline. His thick shock of hair kept this entry wound from being seen at Parkland, but was seen by mortician Tom Robinson and also by photo expert analyst Quentin Schwinn as a 7-8mm diameter wound. If you look at a high resolution copy of the Mary Moorman photo, you can see the exit hole from this wound. It is about 2x2 inches, shaped like a stubby crescent, and high at the back peak of JFK's head. Comparison of camera angles and the positions of motorcycle cops and JFK's head and lens positions reveals that the Mary Moorman photo was taken at Z316. This exit wound hole is dark due to the noon sun angle but not totally black due to ambient light, and at its edge you can see (in high quality Mary Moorman photo copies) the thin jagged line of white that is the edge of JFK's cracked skull bone material, as blasted open by the exiting of the bullet. By the time of Z290 JFK's head is drooped down due to the unconsciousness of his collapsing from the Z250 shot. Backtrack the angle from the exit to the entrance to where the bullet came from, and you can see this shot came from the curb as an upward shot. There is nothing there but a storm drain hole. Obviously this shot had to have come from the storm drain hole which explains why the storm drain hole is airbrushed out of the Nix film version of the JFK shooting sequence. Read up on Jack Lawrence and you will see why he is Suspect #1 for making this shot. Lawrence also was a pal of George Senator, Jack Ruby's apartment roommate. Consult the Roberdeau maps of Dealey Plaza to see why this shot had to have been made at Z290, give or take a frame or two. Sergio Arcacha Smith was one of the two team drivers who tried to kill Ramblin Rose Cheramie on their way from Florida to Dallas to kill JFK. When Smith's apartment was searched, he had engineering blueprints for the storm sewer drainage system of Dealey Plaza. Dr. David Mantik has an X-ray showing how the Z290 bullet tracked from front to back and left particles along the way inside JFK's head. Particles that look like mercury globules that would have been leftovers from being packed into a hollow tip dum-dum bullet. We now clearly have four assassins, considering the physical evidence of the wound angles and sniper angles. More wounding also means more blood leaking out of JFK's blasted brain tissue into the excavated bullet tracks. (6) Z313-- This was the headblaster shot made right in front of witness Bill Newman. It was a larger caliber explosive bullet, likely loaded with mercury fulminate. It created an exit flap out the right side of JFK's head, hinged at the bottom like a small breadbox door. Newman saw that the blasted hole was hollowed out and big enough to place a baseball inside JFK's head. At that point he grabbed his wife and kids and dove for the ground. He didn't wait for the springiness of the connective tissue to shut the flap. Jackie has still seen no blood at this point because everything has stayed in JFK's body so far, or been blasted out the rear or the right side where she cannot see. Jackie is still puzzled by her husband's strange motions. The entrance for this wound was the right rear occipitoparietal region, and will soon be obliterated by the next bullet. Now massive amounts of loose blood are pouring into the hollowed out right side of JFK's head, as if from a garden hose, for the next 1.65 seconds. Owing to the rear angle of attack, we can't tell if this hit is from another sniper or is a second hit from a previous sniper. The sniper count remains at four, minimum. (7) Z342 to Z343-- JFK receives another explosive headblaster from the front right, nominally from the grassy knoll fence. This means the evidence demonstrates, from the sniping angles and wounds, a minimum of five snipers. You can see a chunk out of JFK's head (backed up by Jackie's white glove to highlight it) at the right rear exit. Mortician Tom Robinson and Parkland Dr. Robert McClelland put the entrance as a 5mm hole in the middle of the flap that formed in front of Bill Newman's eyes at Z313. It was at JFK's hairline halfway between his right ear and right eye. The exit was right occipitoparietal skull, forming about a 4x4 inch exit that blasted away the entrance from the Z313 shot. Robert Schorlemer was one of the first medical personnel to tend to JFK at the Parkland Emergency Room and he said that by this stage of wounding JFK's right skull was blasted almost entirely loose and held on by nothing more than a flap-hinge to the rear. Note that Jackie is not screaming as late as Z342 but gets vocal by Z343. She has just seen huge masses of JFK's brain and blood spraying like an explosive fountain all over the trunk (where they are falsely censored from the Zapruder film) and this is when she starts to stand up, then turn around to retrieve pieces of his brain from the trunk. As Clint Hill and Dr. Marion Jenkins (anesthesiologist) said, she was trying to fetch pieces of his brains so the doctors could hopefully put him together again. In the Nix film, Jackie crawls back almost to the rear of the trunk. In the Zapruder dummied up version she only travels about halfway back. There is more fakery involved in the films and the faked testimonies involving the Warren Commission, but this write-up has to end some time. There were more than a dozen other bullets, mostly from rifles equipped with silencers. Which is why most witnesses heard only 3 shots, give or take. ---END---

Firefly: Fine essay. An academic who will look no further than the conventionalities of "received wisdom" is, whether intentionally or inadvertently, just a gatekeeper for official narratives. Something said by Nietzsche is relevant here: "Scientists dig up what they themselves have buried." Ossified presuppositions are not presuppositions at all but fixed parameters and are created and used by men who are neither free nor want to be--and they certainly can't help their neighbors to be free. There used to be something called "intellectual courage," but these guys are just flaccid passive and contented sheep. My basic feeling about them is contempt! Jay Warren Clark

@@jayclark2077 A. Clearly You don't know what is an "essay", thus mislabel my comments for Your personal distorted views, ideas, etc. B. Your comment seems to be among the are within philosophy, using such views, perspectives, thinking, suppositions, and such. C. Your view about these specific individuals, is clearly with some negativity, disdain, etc. and clearly from their presentation, bias, numerous lacking within, without, and clearly involved in the common inDOCtrination and Propaganda. C. However, to claim some ideas from Neitzsche, a philosopher, involved in psychology, which is at most as "Study" [-'logy'] with his claims about "Scientists" is a poor basis, obvious biased, baseless nonsense, since Nietzshce never studied science, used, followed the philosophy of Science, Scientific Method-Methodology" with any aspect of his philosophical, psychology, efforts 'work' during his lifetime => Thus, invalid with any claims about reason, logic and science. D. Yes, clearly this topic about the deaths, killing, murder, assassination of JFK is one a many which remains intentionally, purposely distorted, hidden [still] as with his brother RFK, MLK, Malcom-X, Robert McKinley, Abraham Lincoln, numerous others with the USA alone and far more abroad Worldwide, still. Sincerely

@7700, That is a weird response from the kids.

@@MrMrfreedom1 Yes, they mimic what they hear at home. Most of their parents did not like JFK.

Just to put a different perspective on this...I was an 8 year old military brat. My father was stationed at the Pentagon. We had a portrait of Kennedy in our living room. When the news came over that he had been shot, I cried and prayed until the death was announced. It was one of the saddest days in my life. Judging from my experience and the different footage of him interacting with the public, I would say he was much more loved than hated by the American public. Most the hate came from the deep state such as leadership in the SS, CIA, and FBI and also the mob. I've read alot of SS agents did not like the way he disrespected Jackie with all his womanizing and that makes sense to me. There were also alot of generals who thought they knew better than this young college kid who they considered too weak. But the public loved him probably more than any president in history.

Well said sir. It is all a lie and a reflection of the fact that the cover up continues. Bending history is a crime

@@alwayslernin4400 College kid ? John F Kennedy ? Captain of WW2 PT boat ? Weak ? Where in God's name did you come up with that BS ? Read the story of PT 109 & get a glimpse of why JFK was loved by so many. The Secret Service agents spend 12 to 14 hours some days for months without a break. I would say overworked & many the night / morning before went out drinking. When your hung over as many of these agents were. They are not on their best guard. In fact its a reason why the agent that kept the Limos in good shape was holding the sniper position in the follow up car that day. Not familiar with that role he took that fateful day.

Trump withheld the documents. The coverup continues . National security excuses abound plus protection of long deceased individuals.

The 6th floor museum doesn't 'raise questions'. They don't take a side. They have pro conspiracy authors on, and those who don't believe in a conspiracy on. Also, what do you think is in those few remaining documents?? You really think it's evidence of a conspiracy? If there was a conspiracy, why the heck would they leave around documents revealing it that they knew would eventually get released? They would have just destroyed them!

yep I REALLY do not understand the POINT of this interview....The rest were at least witnesses or around.....I really don't care what these guys have to say and didn't listen beyond a few minutes.....

Thanks for the heads up. Moved on to better things.

Look up the video conspiracy lies it will clear things up. And if you never looked our the window and saw how easy of a shot it was you really can't understand how easy it was

@@enlightenedwarrior7119 the ease of the shot is not the point. That window was not used by any of the shooters. Mac Wallace was on the sixth floor. Opposite end of the building. Shots were fired from the Dal Tech building. And of course the grassy knoll area. The roof of the County Records Building was a probable sniper spot.

@@stevemaher7481 : The enlightened warrior speaks but doesn't account for the fact that a number of shots missed the intended target and hit the pavement, curb, and elsewhere. What about that? Perhaps he is himself a skillful sniper. But if he is, then it is unlikely that he would brag about how easy it is. My guess, however, is that he is just part of the ongoing commitment to keeping the Lone Gunman fantasy before the public mind. Really skillful marksmen are more modest than this fellow--all full of a blustering self confidence. Further more real warriors are not like this. And in any case, for the real warriors, the Martial Artists, the shooter "does not aim at the target, but at himself." But this is another completely different world than the one inhabited by those jackbooted thugs that are so proud of their kills in countries that have neither the capacity nor the intention to harm us! They didn't tell you in school that when we invaded Vietnam it was still operating on a barter system trading rice, etc., for silver, or needed trade goods: rakes, plows, wheelbarrows, etc. And they were a threat to us? Jesus! On this read Fletcher Prowdy's book "JFK," a very enlightening book. Prowdy by the way was the "Deep Throat" in Garrison's book on the assassination. He was there in 1963, and on the docks in Okinawa at the end of World War II! Read the book. It is a rare work. JWC

Because he assassinated Kennedy. His Mexico City trip is the key to any conspiracy and possible connections there. There is no evidence Ruby acted other than on impulse.

No. Clowns are amusing...these asses are disgusting!

Clown Show on Steroids

Read Kroth coup d.etat book or youtube... JFK great... vs evil. But God US people will win in Jesu we trust. Bullets. .. five or what Ballistics a clue and do guns puff smoke

@@robcharlesbrownspeechleyan257 What is a "shameless self promoter?"

Most of these 6th floor museum tapes leave me convinced that the leadership is part of the coverup. Stop blaming Oswald... that lie is our governments side of the story... the truth is 180 degrees in the other direction... as usual.

All the bullet wounds had entrances from behind.

@@DoBraveryFPS Lord they did not. What planet are you on?

Yep. The files will reveal nothing

The files would likely reveal government corruption, and if you want to protect a corrupt institution that is your government in its state of corruption then yeah you would want to protect these files, but if you're interested in having transparency and accountability for whatever may have occurred than it's a no-brainer that we would want to be able to look into this information.

@@cobar5334the CIA will make anything that points to t heir involvement disappear in those files - one would have to be a fool to think otherwise

Why? Only 1 shooter because the wounds in JFK and John Connally trace back in a straight line to Oswald on the 6th floor, and shots as you're suggesting coming from the grassy knoll, the front, the other side of the limo or from the bridge, COULDN'T possibly have created those wounds. The wound in the back of the head was an ENTRANCE wound. The bullet and bullet fragments were a ballistic match to Oswald's rifle.

@@jamesanthony5681 You don't have a darn clue, know nothing concerning ballistics and remain clueless. Which is good.

@@user6008 'You don't have a darn clue, know nothing concerning ballistics and remain clueless. Which is good.' -your comment *damn No bud, and that's why I rely on the ballistics experts. The experts that examined all the bullets and fragments collected and tied them to Oswald's rifle.

You are absolutely correct Melissa, and more importantly, you can not come to that conclusion unless you have common sense. "When Injustice Becomes Law, Resistance Must Become Our Duty" Alleged quotationIf you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.

No Chance Oswald Acted Alone. The proof is in the statements and testimony of the Medical Personnel at Both Hospitals. especially, the suppressed HSCA and ARRB Interviews,. The Conclusions never matched the evidence period!

I watched almost all of it. Lol

They are sealed for 75 years not 100

agreed, buzz. i'm not familiar with gallagher. but i was disappointed, too, that the two speakers are turning a blind eye to the evidence, or suspicious lack thereof. who controlled the "evidence" in this matter? cyril wecht was a guest speaker at the 6th floor at about this same time (nov 2017), and you can find his video in their video selection. "a case for conspiracy with dr. cyril h. wecht." he paints an entirely different picture.

Rep Cornelius Gallagher-A Friend of JFK, RFK and Enemy of Hoover. For your review ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SShXDJKG4BA.html

The museum has always been about furthering the "lone nut" stuff. Remember how they turned Gary Mack? It's not the truth, it's the agenda. Dr. Cyril Wecht is a sharp guy.

thanks, buzz. i will have to watch that video later. hopefully tomorrow. and i'll report back when i do. its clear that the status quo was threatened by jfk and rfk. well, that's my belief. and, what i shame. maybe they could have cleaned up the federal government. it continues to fester.

Your welcome, after watching Neil Gallagher, it may very well leave you as it did me, gutted.

Do you really think lots of just regular people would run TOWARDS gun fire??

Because it was a cover up…..

And you think the Secret Service acted against the wishes of Jackie and RFK when they moved the body out of Parkland? Jackie specified the Bethesda Naval Hospital as the site of the autopsy because her husband served in the Navy in WWII.

I used to think that also but then I think if that was my husband I might have wanted him out of Texas asap feeling like I was in enemy territory. That's not true but I could understand her feeling that way if in fact it was left up to Jackie . I also think I would have left it up to the people responsible for that kind of stuff. There is so much more evidence of government involvement that to me it is clear what happened. Any doubt should be dismissed by the fact that the government has been keeping these files from the american people ever since.

@@jamesanthony5681 Jackie insisted on Bethesda after the body had left Parkland. The Secret Service wanted the autopsy done at Walter Reed Army Hospital. Because of her insistence on Bethesda and on staying with the bronze casket, they had to improvise, which led to the body being removed from the bronze casket and brought to Bethesda in a shipping casket and in a body bag, when the body had been wrapped in sheets at Parkland. This gave them time to alter the body before the official autopsy began.

think you answered your own question, they needed to do the carving before it got to bethesda

i smelled the bullshit pretty early and scrolled down and read your comment, saved me lots of time

Useless dirtballs earning a living off of the JFK murder:(

edfou5 they’re full of shty

well said , I agree a waste of time ..

Bastards are out to sell crappy books!

No way. The mystery of the century.

No

This is BS. Zuburter film contricts this BS

Pictures say a 1000 words. He was hit from the front. Maybe 2 people up on that grassy knoll I've been there and a brick wall is about 2 ft high all around the area .It's very long ..At one end there is area that goes down a hill into a parking lot. I'm not watching this b s anymore. Go look

There just making money

Brian Smith Body double

A body to trick people such as doctor's or the public about JFK head wound etc because Tippits strongly resembled JFK so much so that his nickname was JFK called that by friends and coworkers.🤔

@@insertnamehere313 I don’t think they would use a cop for that.

Revolvers don't leave bullet casings, lol

@@marklindeman9428 they tried to say he ejected the rounds

They had to look a long time to find 2 people that were so ill informed.

Bill Benton I agree. Too much background and puff

Yeah pretty sure Hoover and LBJ also said the Mexico trip never happened, and Mark Lane has some Fed on tape acknowledging the same thing. Total hogwash. Moving on.

Angleton said Oswald was not in Mexico City.

J May how does he know? Only proof can come from the embassy officials and a little late for that

Evidence indicates that Oswald was already at the theatre when Tippet was killed. I believe the movie started at 1:05pm, and Oswald already purchased his ticket by that time. Tippet was shot around 1:15pm.

What?!?! Two more people?!?!?!

I knew as a child something wasn't right. Out of the mouths of babes ...

Mark Rymanowski listened to an interview sometime ago where Tippetts nickname was "JFK." How I thought it was weird when seeing the released autopsy pictures that JFK had such a large gap in between his front two top teeth... Cheers

I have never heard of the "magic bullet theory" nor of the role of Officer Tippetts that you are referring to. Can you provide a reference, as I would like to read about it?

Vodoo, lol

Dumb, dumb.

@TestKanal Zapruder film is a hoax. Kennedy was killed

@TestKanal Kennedy got ambushed by a military attack that was implicated by his accessories! Same with 9/11. Power, control and money.

watch The Men who Killed Kennedy - the full series is available on youTube, this presentation was garbage....

@TestKanal Then all the witnesses who saw him get shot just were all mass hallucinating?

And anyone who can see-knows JFK was shot from the front in the head! This neuromuscular horseshit is only for elite lackeys who want desperately to believe Oswald somehow...someway could have acted alone.

I lasted for 40 minutes, hoping it would get better.