Тёмный

Why China Wants to Massively Launch from the Sea 

Dongfang Hour
Подписаться 32 тыс.
Просмотров 369 тыс.
50% 1

On January 11 2024, the Chinese commercial launch company Orienspace launched the Gravity-1, China's most power solid-fueled (sea launched) rocket, becoming the 4th domestic company to have a sea launch capability.
In this episode, we discuss why Chinese launch companies are bullish on sea launch and why China is massively investing in this technology.
If you like what you see and would like to support me, please consider joining our small Patreon community at / dongfanghour !
We also have some very cool space merch available at shop.dongfanghour.com .

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

27 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 550   
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Do you think there's a business case for sea launch? And if the situation is different between China and other markets? Let me know what you think! 👇
@inkbold8511
@inkbold8511 5 месяцев назад
Maybe it’s cheaper to finding land sites and safer. However can you explain what are the benefits of using solid fuel verse liquid fuel rockets?
@EdwinaTS
@EdwinaTS 5 месяцев назад
Capacity management in an era when space population is getting enormous. Sudden failure of large number of satellites whether through space weather, war or whatever, and also the need to reduce launch risks & to satisfy surges in time critical launch demand.
@WKGSSS
@WKGSSS 5 месяцев назад
@@inkbold8511 方便保存和能快速发射。在商业上不算优点,这公司的可回收液体燃料火箭计划在3年后实用。
@BearsCave
@BearsCave 5 месяцев назад
With sea launch capability, the rocket company could go to the client side, or a place in close propinquity to the client, to launch the payload.
@ZweiZwolf
@ZweiZwolf 5 месяцев назад
Sea launch can be at the equator for maximum lift, and China can afford to pursue efficiencies over the long term. I imagine we'll see larger, purpose-built ocean launchers built for heavier lift and larger payloads.
@100c0c
@100c0c 5 месяцев назад
Even if it's not too economical, it's better than waiting for limited launch windows.
@thisiskevin1000
@thisiskevin1000 5 месяцев назад
Only a matter of time before it becomes economically viable
@ZweiZwolf
@ZweiZwolf 5 месяцев назад
There's a lot of cost in scrubbing a launch, more if you end up completely missing a window due to delays, and even more if you listen to NASA Management to launch when it's too cold for the O-rings to seal properly. Having the option for sea launch is a good thing.
@Mew178
@Mew178 5 месяцев назад
Here thing thing... is not economical? These rockets aren't exactly well to be fair they are rocket science but their cost and research isn't the super expensive engines, it's in the chemicals used. And if all of these are locally sourced, extracted and packed at China prices. These might be actually economical.
@philiptan2051
@philiptan2051 5 месяцев назад
Launching massive rockets from a ship has lots of advantages as the ocean is far bigger area than the landmass. Launching from a mobile sea platform can give an efficient trajectory and increased safety. China has been progressing in this new technology as the payload has been increasing to 6.5 tons. Great development in China.
@fubar12345
@fubar12345 5 месяцев назад
New technology? No. It is new for China - sure. Russia and US have sea launched ICBM's from subs for many years. Same technology, right down to igniting the rocket after it leaves the tube. For Russia and US there isn't much incentive to sea launch larger rockets. They both have access to geographically favourable launch sites.
@SPECIALTRADER1
@SPECIALTRADER1 5 месяцев назад
​@@fubar12345Dude!!! Lol DO YOU KNOW WHAT ICBM STANDS FOR???😂😂😂 DID YOU EVEN WATCH THE VIDEO?? CHINA IS SENDING THESE ROCKETS THE MOST POWERFUL ROCKETS IN WORLD HISTORY INTO SPACE!!! NOT SOMETHING THAT FALLS RIGHT BACK TO THE EARTH..SMH!😮😮
@philiptan2051
@philiptan2051 5 месяцев назад
@@fubar12345 really dude? You don’t learn how to calculate the rocket trajectory using Newton’s laws do you? You are ignorant with a little brain but big mouth. But, it’s okay that you don’t understand the significance of China’s ability to launch large rockets from a ship because the least you know the better. China too has missiles launching from submarines for decades but that is quite different than launching large rockets with multiple stages into the orbit. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@zhengzhang4275
@zhengzhang4275 5 месяцев назад
@@fubar12345 lol obviously we are not just launching a missile, it's sure the most powerful solid rocket
@Alam-ni9wq
@Alam-ni9wq 4 месяца назад
@@fubar12345 stupid....
@chankaan888
@chankaan888 5 месяцев назад
Trivia: This is a rocket from a Chinese private rocket company called "ORIEN SPACE". Its founder's name is "Yao Song". He was born in 1992 and is only 31 years old this year. China currently has many private rocket companies.
@AngelAngel-pc5mc
@AngelAngel-pc5mc 5 месяцев назад
USA will sanction them as it has threatened national security
@Reotha
@Reotha 5 месяцев назад
Dont be fooled by the word private company,their are inline and somehow affiliated with the government and aome of its funding,which is not bad by my own observation.
@riza-2396
@riza-2396 5 месяцев назад
@@Reotha Well Space X is also basically Elon Musk paying money to use NASA technology
@Anonymous------
@Anonymous------ 5 месяцев назад
@@Reotha In today's China the people and the government are one, unlike in other countries. Anyone knows China well knows the China that's under the communist party's management is the best China ever in its past thousands of years history. China is now one big family.
@SK-lt1so
@SK-lt1so 5 месяцев назад
"Private"?! 😆😆😆
@leolee5435
@leolee5435 5 месяцев назад
Love your slow and concise briefings. Keep up the good work.
@ericliume
@ericliume 5 месяцев назад
The difference here is the Chinese sea launch site is usually close to the coastline. It makes it fast to reach and low cost to travel to. It also makes it easy and cost little for the maintenance, comparing to the operation cost of Sea Launch Co. P.S. The 6.5-ton capability of Gravity to LEO, 3.8 to 700km SSO is pretty much covering all spectrum of satellites nowadays we mostly launch.
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Good points
@sadianadeem9667
@sadianadeem9667 5 месяцев назад
I'm seeing China as Super Power after 2030, they are growing at imense rapid speed. Immpresive.
@MarcosCapixaba
@MarcosCapixaba 5 месяцев назад
2030 you are too late to the party, since 2014 they are the number 1
@beneric4851
@beneric4851 5 месяцев назад
Never,US will start a war in China before that.
@user-gj8nd8br6p
@user-gj8nd8br6p 5 месяцев назад
我们还是发展中国家,得先努力成为发达国家
@MarcosCapixaba
@MarcosCapixaba 5 месяцев назад
@@user-gj8nd8br6p just another American mental trick
@MINHONG-co7sn
@MINHONG-co7sn 5 месяцев назад
@@user-gj8nd8br6pThe US military is still number one, China is committed to economic and infrastructure construction
@lyri-kyunero
@lyri-kyunero 5 месяцев назад
Before the reusable rockets can be put into use, China already proposed some strategies to reduce the risk of the falling boosters and first stages. They tried to equip the boosters of LM-3B with parashutes to reduce the area on which they fall, and the boosters on the new LM-7s are designed to separate with first stage.
@Heromattgamergt
@Heromattgamergt 5 месяцев назад
Before China proposed that. NASA already, was making plans and strategies related to that before the Apollo Program.
@SaintFluffySnow
@SaintFluffySnow 5 месяцев назад
@matthewrobertpasague4944👈❎️ do you realize how silly and impractical such massively heavy parachutes would weigh aimed at controlling the descent of Apollo's Saturn V primary main boosters entail?! such massive parachutes would exceed Apollo's command or lunar modules parachutes only make more sense if they are smaller, lighter, stronger, for much lighter, smaller separate "multiple modular reusable side boosters", with ones meant for the central booster, designed only to facilitate a "controlled crash" only (not necessarily to preserve it)
@DW-op7ly
@DW-op7ly 5 месяцев назад
Before NASA proposed that the Chinese invented the Rocket in the 12th century. Before than more rudimentary rockets in the 9th
@russelfang7434
@russelfang7434 5 месяцев назад
@@Heromattgamergt So what? Do the Chinese always need to sing the praises of the great NASA God before they launching any rocket?🤔
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 5 месяцев назад
@@Heromattgamergt But NASA didn't implement it.
@andrethib
@andrethib 5 месяцев назад
one advantage that these Chinese sea launch companies have over SeaLaunch, is that SeaLaunch alone had to build out (and pay for) its own infrastructure. Here, the local governments are supporting that buildout, plus there are multiple companies sharing the infrastructure which lets them take advantage of economies of scale. it will be interesting to see how this develops in the future
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Fully agree with you, I think the government support for the infrastructure is key here.
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 5 месяцев назад
I have been waiting for this video!
@oneplanetearth
@oneplanetearth 5 месяцев назад
Thank you DongFang Hours. I am enjoying your program.🚀🚀🚀
@afuyan
@afuyan 5 месяцев назад
Thankyou as always to make me keep updated in China's space news!
@kmetharom
@kmetharom 5 месяцев назад
A brilliant hi-tech documentary from Dongfang Hour. Thank you. ❤❤❤❤
@erich623
@erich623 5 месяцев назад
Happy new year Jean 🎉 Looking forward to you videos this year. Especially interested in the VTVL testing that seems like it will be ramping up this year.
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Happy new year Erich! We'll definitely be covering the VTVL tests in future videos 🙂
@prakasamkannadi7616
@prakasamkannadi7616 5 месяцев назад
Some Europian countries do not have launch facilities , because of geogrphy. Perhaps China demonstrating that it can overcome such limitations.
@alienmicrobes
@alienmicrobes 5 месяцев назад
They also have the Wenchang commercial launch site on Hainan.
@demeurecorentin
@demeurecorentin День назад
It's interesting how in China the local government is investing in infrastructure allowing space companies to settle. In the United States, it's often the opposite, with the space company being the one investing in the local area and undergoing lawsuits in order to be able to build the infrastructure. To not mention having to face lawsuits by environmental organizations and so on.
@qingshanyipian1936
@qingshanyipian1936 5 месяцев назад
Happy new year 🎉. Thank you for the great content. Awesome work 👏👏
@frogman740
@frogman740 5 месяцев назад
Pure dope as usual. Dongfang Hour clearly in the top 3 best space youtube channels out there. Looking forward to collabs with Scott Manley and Timm Dodd!
@hongqingxiang3374
@hongqingxiang3374 5 месяцев назад
Thank you very much for your informative update🙂👍🙏
@MsCat71
@MsCat71 5 месяцев назад
Thank you! I’ve never heard about Sea Launch, before, but it looks like it was cool! Happy New Year! 🎉
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Happy new year! 😊
@MsCat71
@MsCat71 5 месяцев назад
Thanks! 😀@@DongfangHour
@yqisq6966
@yqisq6966 5 месяцев назад
nice coverage with detailed specs and context. not just sentimental bs most channels out there do.
@davidstevenson9517
@davidstevenson9517 5 месяцев назад
Happy New Year, Dongfang Hour! Thank you again for your reports; your channel is my principal source for info on China's public and private Space programs. Hello from New Zealand! 🇨🇳🚀🇳🇿
@PinkLittleElephant
@PinkLittleElephant 5 месяцев назад
Interesting and engaging as always! I'm sure that in one of your previous videos about Chinese launch sites, you also mentioned a new development about a coastal launch site? As far as ship-based launches go, it must help if the rocket are based on solid fuel engines so no issue about fuelling or topping up on a ship.
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Absolutely, there's a commercial launch site currently being built in Wenchang, and which will enter into service in mid-2024. It will also play a role in easing the launch bottleneck for commercial companies.
@rocketpunch12210
@rocketpunch12210 5 месяцев назад
Thanks for the insight! Very informative.
@abdulrashidabang5583
@abdulrashidabang5583 5 месяцев назад
The US will say that china is coping with the Americans rocket that only went into the sky for a few seconds before it exploded
@jonasoffice9853
@jonasoffice9853 5 месяцев назад
When China started trains to Europe, traffic was hopeless. Now the train goes to every corner of Europe especially in times of Red Sea blockade. When China starts a project, you bet it will be big in future.
@yzhang9265
@yzhang9265 5 месяцев назад
This launch looks so different =) Thanks for sharing and explain this.
@klubcj
@klubcj 5 месяцев назад
Indian and US news say the rocket fuel is power by Water 😂
@donduv4332
@donduv4332 5 месяцев назад
Jealous 😮
@EeeLife
@EeeLife 5 месяцев назад
If that's real, that will be a miracle.
@russelfang7434
@russelfang7434 5 месяцев назад
The toxic side of Western propaganda, the Chinese are always simultaneously strong and weak, aggressive and cowardice, depending on how the god of media in Western countries need to captivate their people.
@st.altair4936
@st.altair4936 5 месяцев назад
That would be cool af though
@bobsmith3983
@bobsmith3983 5 месяцев назад
That would mean that the Chinese are geniuses to get a rocket powered by water to ferry satellites into orbit. The people who are saying that China's rockets are powered by water are denigrating themselves.
@harrykuehn2421
@harrykuehn2421 5 месяцев назад
Sea based lauches are harder to track by the NRO in America. As well determining payload. These launches can be done quickly, so in a time war. If vital Chinese satellites are disrupted or destroyed. They can be replaced to some degree.
@100c0c
@100c0c 5 месяцев назад
In a time of war, why wouldn't land based launches be used? If they aren't safe, China would have much bigger problems in that scenario.
@harrykuehn2421
@harrykuehn2421 5 месяцев назад
A land based isn't mobile and a mobile launching ship could be made to look like a normal research vessel or logistics ship. The oceans are a big place and to have a fleet of SBLV could assist with surface level observation of the enemy or launch small satellites for communication and visual reconnaissance in low orbit.
@100c0c
@100c0c 5 месяцев назад
@@harrykuehn2421 That makes little difference in direct confrontation. Especially in the age of hypersonics. Land based options offer all advantages.
@tluangasailo3663
@tluangasailo3663 5 месяцев назад
US launch rapid rocket launch from a plane in time of war.
@100c0c
@100c0c 5 месяцев назад
@@tluangasailo3663 When exactly? The US' emergency launch programme uses land based launches.
@jacobrocks7
@jacobrocks7 5 месяцев назад
Awesome reporting ..thanks
@armandomercado2248
@armandomercado2248 5 месяцев назад
Great coverage as always.
@AshleyMcIntosh-zz7kr
@AshleyMcIntosh-zz7kr 5 месяцев назад
Very interesting.thanks.
@Ronolein
@Ronolein 5 месяцев назад
Allerbeste Grüße und Dank für Deine Arbeit von mir aus Germany!
@pasqualedellacitta
@pasqualedellacitta 2 месяца назад
Thank you Jean, very convincing arguments !
@seebuslove
@seebuslove 5 месяцев назад
Thanks for sharing.
@dz9446
@dz9446 4 месяца назад
Another excellent piece, very accurate observation, spot on🎉🎉🎉
@jayz888
@jayz888 5 месяцев назад
I believe you missed the real reason - strategic! When war comes, it is only a question of when, the inland site can be put out of service in short order. Knocking out sea launch capacity will be much more difficult. The US off course will face the same problem. Most likely a bigger problem - given the performance of China's hypersonic missiles and the current lack of US capability to deal with them.
@irvingpeay3294
@irvingpeay3294 Месяц назад
Exactly what I was thinking 💭. China 🇨🇳 is playing the long game. Strategy…. Sea launching
@wbflee
@wbflee 5 месяцев назад
Very good, clear Voice, talking speed is just right, not too fast, not too slow. Very comfortable for the ears. It is an enjoyment listening to your talk. Keep up the good work, thank you.
@audistik1199
@audistik1199 5 месяцев назад
That would depend on many things. The weight and infrastructure needs for the launch (liquid cryogenics the worst case,) whether the cost is warranted to attain the orbit inclination desired, the size and payload, and many other things that I’m not qualified to say off the top of my head. This is a per-case, intensive costing problem.
@Feeshermon
@Feeshermon 5 месяцев назад
Yooo great video! So awesome to finally have a youtuber that properly understands both China and its Space industry, rather than just 1, or worse, neither...
@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT
@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT 5 месяцев назад
Thanks for clearing the doubt "why sea launch?"
@magnaviator
@magnaviator 5 месяцев назад
Interesting variety coming out of China...amazing tech!
@subramaniamchandrasekar1397
@subramaniamchandrasekar1397 5 месяцев назад
Only these reasons. 1. No villages nearby if the rockets fail (happened many times). 2. Rockets can fly east once launched due to earth rotation, but not over any land in the beginning because of reason 1.
@dphuntsman
@dphuntsman 5 месяцев назад
Good thoughts. My only hiccup actually is with Orien’s solid launch: that ‘steel tornado’ that was produced- akin to the ‘rock tornado’ produced by Starship’s IFT-1 test launch- is something I kinda expected from such a big set of solids on a ship…which is why I never expected anyone to try that from a ship…..(as opposed to a cold tube lunch, for example). It wasn’t trivial; and notice, they have not been forthcoming- to my knowledge - with what the economic damage done to the ship has been. They did imply they will be moving into liquids themselves; if I had to guess the generation of the ‘steel tornado’ probably is giving them even more impetus to move that changeover up even faster. - Dave Huntsman
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Hey Dave! I agree that the debris from the launch on the video seemed a bit extreme. It will be interesting to see how fast the launch vessel can be put back into service as an indication of the damage.
@qiufusheng3058
@qiufusheng3058 5 месяцев назад
US would complain China for not sharing its technology to US. LoL
@inkbold8511
@inkbold8511 5 месяцев назад
😂 typical
@timothychung4811
@timothychung4811 5 месяцев назад
Pretty hard to replicate sea water no?😂
@bfair6284
@bfair6284 5 месяцев назад
Didn't they already complained for not getting the moon sample? 🤔😄
@100c0c
@100c0c 5 месяцев назад
If China was sending ships to the equator, it would be a benefit. But this is near the coast so the US has no need for this. SpaceX can launch without much backlog and just drop into the Gulf of Mexico.
@hengongchua6250
@hengongchua6250 5 месяцев назад
The shameless Engdian will criticize saying China tofu rocket can only launch at sea as the tofu rocket is too soft to launch on land.
@SaintFluffySnow
@SaintFluffySnow 5 месяцев назад
Sea-Launch is "location flexible", especially, those wanting "heaviest payloads" that take advantage of "maximum boost (using minimum thrust)" Equatorial Launches with "maximum orbital incline plane options" (can accommodate seasonal changes better, too) fixed land-based launches suffer too restricted launch window options
@kennethkueh1256
@kennethkueh1256 5 месяцев назад
Factual and informative. Not another anti China fact twisting narratives. Good job. Keep it up man.
@TruthPrevail777
@TruthPrevail777 5 месяцев назад
The West: oh its a copy, it's stolen, oh Chinese made make it to the Moon. How funny! When all these sour grapes keep shouting they couldn't realise they're being beaten and slowly outpace in the race in every sphere.
@AerialWaviator
@AerialWaviator 5 месяцев назад
Very insightful and informative as always. SeaLaunch (the company) suffered from a very sparse launch cadence. If China can establish a higher launch cadence, then the advantage in launch flexibility becomes becomes an operational capability. The launch platform looks like it's capable of supporting reusable booster landings. This where things could get interesting. For example, having a launch industry based in populous southern region. Launching 75-100 km offshore eliminates many concerns like rocket noise pollution and other rocket related risks, while having excellent resources and logistics. It also separates commercial space activities from military activities, so each can have more dedicated infrastructure.
@johnmiranda2307
@johnmiranda2307 5 месяцев назад
This is brilliant!! Thank you.
@davidstevenson9517
@davidstevenson9517 5 месяцев назад
I recommend this channel for China Space news; informative and unbiased, a rarity. Hello from New Zealand. 🇨🇳🚀🇳🇿
@raindear811
@raindear811 5 месяцев назад
Great update !
@jozahfa
@jozahfa 5 месяцев назад
Longa vida à China, aos chineses e ao novo mundo multipolar!
@spehropefhany
@spehropefhany 5 месяцев назад
Solid fuel+ sea launches strikes me as very flexible and scalable. That might be more important than raw costs.
@davewhite3629
@davewhite3629 5 месяцев назад
Where have you been we’ve missed the dongfang hour hope everything is ok on your end. Without you we would never know how good china is doing.
@jasonwise8957
@jasonwise8957 5 месяцев назад
That looks so cool 😍
@willwray8511
@willwray8511 5 месяцев назад
Very informative
@thisiskevin1000
@thisiskevin1000 5 месяцев назад
The abundance of sea water as natural source of hydrogen and oxygen fuels for rocket engines
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 5 месяцев назад
They don't make H2 and O2 out in the middle of the ocean.
@ZweiZwolf
@ZweiZwolf 5 месяцев назад
@@gelinrefira They can tie green electrolysis to an offshore wind turbine, so the H2 and O2 are generated and stored right at the shoreline where the launcher would be loaded and prepped.
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 5 месяцев назад
@@ZweiZwolf On shore sure. But you sound like they should be generating the H2 and O2 on the ship itself.
@SamsungSamsung-ph9ln
@SamsungSamsung-ph9ln 5 месяцев назад
Well done China keep it up n God bless.
@davidstevenson9517
@davidstevenson9517 3 месяца назад
The massive amounts of money the city of Shandong (5:45) has poured into this launch facility has no comparison in any other city! What a project! A true Space Port City of the 21st Century, designed specifically to faciltate private Space enterprise and set to become a future centre of Space Commerce. What Civic foresight, an example to be followed.
@mike4evolution
@mike4evolution 5 месяцев назад
Thank you. 🌹
@georgeeagle872
@georgeeagle872 5 месяцев назад
It's rumoured that a new launch site in Ningbo, Zhejiang Provinve, purely used for commercial launches, has been mooted for some time.
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Indeed, very little news from the Ningbo (Xiangshan) launch site project...
@xTheUnderscorex
@xTheUnderscorex 5 месяцев назад
It's interesting, and the improved launch parameters possible from launching anywhere they want in the Western Pacific seems reason enough to have pursued it. It just isn't nearly as cool as the Sea Dragon concept from way back, which is what I expect to see when I hear "sea launched".
@isodin1951
@isodin1951 5 месяцев назад
sorry if this sound stupid as my knowledge about rockets are really limited, but why don't they do it from islands ?
@Epiderm91
@Epiderm91 4 месяца назад
That cold launch is dope as fck...imagine the few seconds of high G force the taikonauts experiencing, stop, and back again until it reach orbit.. 😂
@crazyelf1
@crazyelf1 5 месяцев назад
It may make sense at some point to sail closer to the equator and launching there.
@sunshinesun121
@sunshinesun121 5 месяцев назад
Assumption that China cost for launches are same as Europe,Russian, JV is rediclous. China VAST engineering and high tech manufacturing is way ahead. Thus cheaper, faster and well planned.
@IamHandsome4u
@IamHandsome4u 5 месяцев назад
I saw this video on insta and westerners and indians were whining abt pollution and they were also saying this launch destroyed the ship in half, LOL😂😂😂, they will always find something to cry.
@ulaikamor
@ulaikamor 5 месяцев назад
Can you make a comparative breakdown of space launches between the US and China? Not only for rockets and parts, but also for manpower.
@whatswhite110
@whatswhite110 5 месяцев назад
​@morallee6826中国没有刻意追赶美国,就是自己在跟自己比,不停的进步就行。美国不是我们的目标,星辰大海是,所以差多少年不重要,从来都不重要。哪怕领先,也不重要。我们的目标一直都非常明确。美国喜欢比,是他自己的事。我们走我们的路。
@RP-mm9ie
@RP-mm9ie 5 месяцев назад
thanks
@user-uz4ow1lv4j
@user-uz4ow1lv4j 5 месяцев назад
Any rocket can disbalance the ship from where it is launched it is likely the exhaust is directed in a L shape over a raised launch pad
@DaMomento
@DaMomento 5 месяцев назад
That’s amazing
@eddymich3192
@eddymich3192 5 месяцев назад
Even though uneconomical to launch from the sea, those launch prices are quite low. Compared to the prices offered by American launch companies.
@deerazor8280
@deerazor8280 5 месяцев назад
Would transporting all the launch equipment and the rocket to the top of a mountain and launching from there instead of at sea level, would the overall cost be less more or less of the cost of a regular launch from sea level 🚀
@seasong7655
@seasong7655 5 месяцев назад
Here in Germany there is also a sealaunch project, but definitely not as advanced as China. But I think it's a good idea to get around all the NIMBYs
@johnwe4431
@johnwe4431 Месяц назад
Those are decommissioned inter-continental missile from army, make good use of it after a little bit modification, then the army will have up to date ones.
@leisurecomments8176
@leisurecomments8176 4 месяца назад
You're the next generation Carl Sagan. How did you get such intel and videos from China?
@ireview449
@ireview449 4 месяца назад
Do you speak chinese or where do you get all these informations from ? :o
@rowshambow
@rowshambow 5 месяцев назад
The new space race has begun
@John-wd5cb
@John-wd5cb 5 месяцев назад
USA and Russia do shows, China does bussines.
@sayaandyangsaya2756
@sayaandyangsaya2756 5 месяцев назад
Impression rocket launch
@michaelzap8528
@michaelzap8528 5 месяцев назад
this guy is expert.
@davidstevenson9517
@davidstevenson9517 5 месяцев назад
As well as reporting on Chinese Space launch developments, our host occasionally split-screens with another Canadian reporting on Chinese "financial" space developments. DongFang Hour has also given live coverage of CNSA launches of new modules to the "Tiangong-3" space station. Note: CNSA plans to add 3 new modules to T-3 over the next 2-3 years, making T-3 almost equal to ISS. (re: DFH.)🇨🇦🚀🛰🇨🇳
@magnaviator
@magnaviator 18 дней назад
Why not just build more launch sites in Hainan, that would seem to be the most cost effective?
@TheEyesOfNye
@TheEyesOfNye 5 месяцев назад
Thank you for this well made video! I have a question about your perspective if you don't mind my asking. I'm trying to learn about the objective reality of China as best I can. To this end I think it's important to hear from people with many different perspectives, both positive and negative. It seems to me that most English language coverage of china is negative. Negative perspectives are very important but too much can create a biased and nonobjective view. Therefor, I am trying to find more neutral or positive perspectives to help balance out the full picture for me. So, with the obvious caveats such as complexity and nuance understood would you say your overall perspective on China is very negative, mostly negative, completely neutral, mostly positive, or very positive? Thanks! And to reiterate, I'm only inquiring so that I can curate my media intake to be as balanced as possible.
@directxxxx71
@directxxxx71 4 месяца назад
He is neutral, neither pro China nor anti-China. He just wants to provide his knowledge about Chinese space news to the international audiences as a space enthusiast.
@XkMeng
@XkMeng 4 месяца назад
@directxxxx71 Chinese people don’t even need “pro-China”, they just need to report the facts without filters
@carsonchan5102
@carsonchan5102 5 месяцев назад
very massive
@rexbridewell7966
@rexbridewell7966 5 месяцев назад
LoL nobody getting past the FIRMAMENT
@rayellebishop8168
@rayellebishop8168 5 месяцев назад
I would not want to be that close to a launch.
@kumbackquatsta
@kumbackquatsta 5 месяцев назад
launch and land from sea, here we come
@benhardsim8629
@benhardsim8629 4 месяца назад
Isn't china building their own space hub in Hainan ? Is there any update regarding that ?
@KVP424
@KVP424 3 месяца назад
2 more commercial Launch Pad will come online this year at Wenchang. Also there are rumor that the launch pad for Long March 10 the main Chinese Lunar mission rocket might begin construction sometime later, though I am not sure when that will be.
@itinsuranceguy
@itinsuranceguy 5 месяцев назад
Do you think in the future that China could develop any of the islands in the South China Sea into a Spaceport, or would the logistics make the idea prohibitively expensive?
@RexNathanChan
@RexNathanChan 5 месяцев назад
New video 🙌🏻📼
@oklahoma1232
@oklahoma1232 5 месяцев назад
Brilliant Communist China PRC ! luv ya ! Chinese Commust Party, great organisation & management !💚
@FirstTakahashi
@FirstTakahashi 5 месяцев назад
Reusable rocket + sea launch will bring best of both worlds
@tluangasailo3663
@tluangasailo3663 5 месяцев назад
Pointless for reusable rocket, it only makes things complicated, costly and time consuming 😅 .....
@chadlyles5444
@chadlyles5444 5 месяцев назад
I don't understand why they lost it from a silk that makes it more vulnerable right
@edidervishi7102
@edidervishi7102 5 месяцев назад
US: China Copies US 2030 Technology😂
@tedb5432
@tedb5432 5 месяцев назад
There will be military applications for those. ICBM could be launch via the platforms, mobile launchers
@tluangasailo3663
@tluangasailo3663 5 месяцев назад
Yea, there a submarine for that purpose , a ballistic missile are launch from submarine
@michaelzap8528
@michaelzap8528 5 месяцев назад
typical Indian thinking.......
@regolith1350
@regolith1350 5 месяцев назад
Dayam, that ship's deck got absolutely wrecked by the solid rocket boosters. Debris flying everywhere LOL.
@wulfw.8452
@wulfw.8452 4 месяца назад
Sea launch and the ship barely moves how is that possible?
@leolee5435
@leolee5435 5 месяцев назад
Thanks!
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 месяцев назад
Thanks for your support to Dongfang Hour, Leo! 🙏
@sense1510
@sense1510 5 месяцев назад
By 2017 China was able to domestically produce ball point pens.
Далее
Inside China's Reusable Rocket Program
17:11
Просмотров 139 тыс.
A Reusable Chinese Stainless Steel Rocket in 2025?
12:40
Lenovo is Chinese. Why aren't they sanctioned?
15:50
Просмотров 752 тыс.
Why China's Shenzhou is Better Than Russia's Soyuz
16:27
This Is Why You Can’t Go To Antarctica
29:30
Просмотров 2,1 млн
AMERICANS IN CHINA (not what we expected🤯)
32:03
Просмотров 1,3 млн
REAL TIME - Artemis 1 Orion Re-Entry
25:01
Просмотров 1,8 млн
The Untold Story of the Intelsat 708 Accident
13:51
Просмотров 15 тыс.
Moon rush: the launch of a lunar economy | FT Film
27:08
Why 94% of China Lives East of This Line
18:34
Просмотров 6 млн
FullHD в 8К БЕЗ ПОТЕРЬ? |РАЗБОР
20:42
FullHD в 8К БЕЗ ПОТЕРЬ? |РАЗБОР
20:42