Тёмный

Why I Became An Atheist 

Bros Bibles & Beer
Подписаться 321
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.
50% 1

We respond to a clip of someone who says he became an atheist when he got fed up with church leaders who didn't have good answers to his questions about the Bible and his faith struggles. From episode 239 "Is The Church The Cause Of Atheism?"
#podcast #christian #deconstruction #faith
If you like what you see, SUBSCRIBE & SHARE IT this week!
Send us a voicemail: www.speakpipe.com/bros
/ @brosbiblesbeer
open.spotify.com/show/4KzBBc7...
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
brosbiblesbeer.simplecast.com/
⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ / brosbiblesbeer⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠...
⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ / brosbiblesbeer⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠...
/ brosbiblesbeer
⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠brosbiblesbeer@gmail.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
Bros Bibles & Beer is: Jeff, Zack & Andy Find us wherever fine podcasts are distributed. Oh, and share us with a friend this week! Grace. Peace. Cheers!

Опубликовано:

 

2 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 85   
@tee_saw
@tee_saw 6 дней назад
As a Christian, it's good to ask questions. And don't stop asking questions, while staying honest and open minded. But don't confuse faith(trust) with blind faith.
@rubba6818
@rubba6818 5 дней назад
Trust is trust, but faith is complete trust and blind by definition. Faith is automatically blind. When you have evidences you do not need faith, faith is the weakest position.
@ADanZLife
@ADanZLife 5 дней назад
I could believe in a higher power, but I cannot be convinced to believe in the god described in the Bible. Angels are a very big deal in the Bible and they are rarely talked about genuinely and honestly. I wonder why that is.
@nathansimpson5721
@nathansimpson5721 5 дней назад
Faith is by definition, blind. Hebrews 11:1 defines faith and quite explicitly states that you cannot observe what you are placing hope and assurance in. If you don't think biblical faith is blind, you haven't read your bible enough.
@veraciity7
@veraciity7 4 дня назад
@@nathansimpson5721it says “faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” Clearly, this is showing how there is evidence that you have not seen but the evidence exist. For example nobody has seen the big bang but there is evidence for it that we are able to observe. We see the evidence just weren’t there for the event. In other words there is evidence of Jesus Christ existence and Church History. And that points to Him being God in the flesh. And a contrast is shown with the apostle Thomas where He believed Jesus Christ was resurrected. Not by evidence but by proof. Then Jesus told him “blessed are those who believe and have not seen.”
@nathansimpson5721
@nathansimpson5721 4 дня назад
@@veraciity7 It depends on which translation you read. The author of Hebrews is not talking about literal sight exclusively. They're saying that the evidence cannot be observed, and gives sight as an example of observation. If you think that the author exclusively meant vision, I think that is laughable. We know the big bang happened because there is observable evidence for such. We do not have observable evidence for the existence of god/gods, and therefore faith is required. Faith is the substance of things HOPED for. Which means faith is the substance of things you wish to be true, regardless of the ability to observe it. Not just see it, but observe it as a whole.
@KEP1983
@KEP1983 6 дней назад
Notice that he didn't say he found all of his answers to be unsatisfactory, he said he couldn't find ANY answers. People just "refused" to answer him and literally didn't even offer answers. Sorry, but I call BS. This is the age of the internet. You can find a response from a great philosopher to pretty much any question any atheist brings. There's no more excuse for not finding answers. You may be not *satisfied* with the answer, but that's very different than saying they "had no answers" and "refused to answer my questions." Am I seriously to believe a zoomer in his early 20s *only* goes to his local church elders for answers, and didn't think to look up answers online from apologists and philosophers? I highly doubt it. In actuality, he wasn't looking for answers. He was looking for excuses to sin, probably because he knew fornication was wrong, and he wanted to indulge in it.
@rubba6818
@rubba6818 5 дней назад
People have looked for defensive responses for religions like christianity/islam/hinduism and much older religions for thousands of years. The internet, science and technology is too much for the old magic trickery of the old outdated religions to defend. There are no "mystical" answers that can defend your religion. Religion is on the way out.....
@BlasterMaster80
@BlasterMaster80 5 дней назад
Have you ever heard of the term, intellectual charity or intellectual fairmindedness?
@KEP1983
@KEP1983 5 дней назад
@@BlasterMaster80 yes. It doesn't mean to ignore reality. I think it's intellectually dishonest to state that a person under 40 was honestly seeking answers and literally couldn't find any answers, and no one would even offer answers.
@BlasterMaster80
@BlasterMaster80 5 дней назад
@@KEP1983 I don't think you're casting this individual in the most fair minded way here. I think your ascribing intentions you cannot account for. Do you often pretend you know things about others that you can't account for?
@ADanZLife
@ADanZLife 5 дней назад
@@KEP1983 If someone can just find all the answers online, then why do churches, priests, pastors, and the Pope still exist? And you know what people can find on the internet when looking for questions regarding religion? Atheism. So are you sure you want to promote people seeking answers on the internet?
@MarkoGh
@MarkoGh 6 дней назад
Where does it says in the Bible that Sola Scriptura is all you need? please tell me
@calfox
@calfox 5 дней назад
where does it say, it's not all you need?
@shawnbrewer7
@shawnbrewer7 5 дней назад
In his podcast, The Whole Counsel of God, Fr. Stephen De Young mentioned that, most of the time, when the Bible uses the words "faith" or "believe," it is better translated as "faithful" or "faithfulness." This interpretation makes much more sense, especially when considering Paul's references to finishing the race and holding fast to traditions.
@Knuckles2oO6
@Knuckles2oO6 4 дня назад
I pray for you all 🙏
@b34rea1
@b34rea1 5 дней назад
As an agnostic coming from a Muslim background, this was very refreshing to share. I feel like Christianity and Islam have very common similarities that both religions have that we don't really discuss. Thank you for posting this!
@Denver_____
@Denver_____ 6 дней назад
This guy is about to make everything his golden calf, get depressed and keep on the flywheel of the world.
@Knuckles2oO6
@Knuckles2oO6 4 дня назад
May you find Christ again. Good works with strong faith. Be a righteous man!
@astonwinter
@astonwinter 5 дней назад
funny how the host said "Ignore" that last part when the man in the video said "I'm happier" it is possible to be happy without a religion. I'm an Atheist & to be an Atheist is to accept that there is no evidence in a God. I recommend all those that are not scared to think to go look at videos from Alex O'Connor & Richard Dawkins
@nathanbrannan5228
@nathanbrannan5228 5 дней назад
Yeah I heard that too and I was like, "Why?". I'm a Christian, but ignoring the fact that anyone can be happy under any circumstance that they find enjoyable is an obvious thing. Christianity doesn't exist for sheer enjoyment. Having to abide by rules that you don't set is not enjoyable from the outset. I've learned to enjoy the limitations, but the core of our beings want to do our own thing, so for me, it's not something he should've said, "Ignore that last bit." Also, another guy to test faith with is Richard Carrier and his "Jesus Mythicism." That's a real doozy.
@malinko35
@malinko35 5 дней назад
Richard Dawkins is vehemently anti-christian.
@calfox
@calfox 5 дней назад
no evidence or you dont believe there is enough evidence
@astonwinter
@astonwinter 5 дней назад
@@calfox lol no evidence cause if there were you wouldn't be saying the word "Believe". I dont say to people that they must "Believe" that I own a black car. They can see pictures, videos or come to my house & see it for themselves. You cant do that with God
@calfox
@calfox 4 дня назад
@@astonwinter do you Believe that when you get a prescription filled they put the right medicine in the bottle and not poison? Do you Believe based on no evidence or Do you Believe based on the evidence that the pharmacy is trust worthy? You have can evidence for something that can;t you proven and still Believe and have faith based on the evidence
@nathansimpson5721
@nathansimpson5721 5 дней назад
2:15 Depending on how you define faith, you're absolutely wrong. If you define faith the way the Bible defines it in Hebrews 11:1 (Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see), not everyone in the world utilizes that definition of faith. The Bible basically claims that faith in anything (but particularly god) is confidence in what we HOPE to be true, without having observable evidence to validate the claim. Which is why it says "assurance about we do not see/observe". The issue with this definition of faith is that you can apply it to any claim. A racist can claim to have faith that white people are superior to black people, based on the confidence that they hope for and assurance about what they cannot observe. There are a million other examples, but that was the first to come to mind. If you define faith as being a synonym for the word "confidence", than yes I would agree that everyone in the world has faith. When you have confidence for something, you have evidence to back up your confidence. If I'm going to sit in a chair and I'm confident it will hold my weight, I'm not hoping that it will hold my weight because of some hope that is unobservable (as defined in Hebrews 11:1), I am confident that it will hold my weight because we have observable evidence to suggest that the chair is capable of holding my weight. Perhaps I have sat in the chair previously. I can touch the screws and bolts that keep the chair sturdy. There are peer reviews on the internet about the integrity of this chair. There is plenty of evidence that is observable about the integrity of the chair, which is why it doesn't qualify as faith in the biblical sense. If we are just using faith as a synonym for confidence, why have the word faith at all? It's rather redundant and misleading if you do that. Faith has it's own meaning defined by the book of Hebrews and we should stick with that definition in my opinion.
@ADanZLife
@ADanZLife 5 дней назад
I also asked questions that either went unanswered or the answers that were given were not satisfactory to me. Another reason I left the church and looked elsewhere for moral guidance is because Christians would say one thing, but do another as well as use the Bible and God to justify lying, stealing, cheating, etc. As someone who cares deeply about ethics and morality, the church failed me. Once I left the church and read the Bible front to back, I realized that there was so much of it that was not being talked about, or would be interpreted in such a way that would defend things we would consider evil today. I have no issue with people who are religious and go to church, but I think Christians need to realize that they themselves are pushing people away from Christianity.
@tljmma
@tljmma 6 дней назад
When you have sufficient evidence of a claim, you don’t need faith. Faith is belief without evidence, or even worse at times - belief in spite of evidence. Faith is not a virtue.
@joshuaduncan8834
@joshuaduncan8834 6 дней назад
Y'all theobrogians sound alllmossst sensible enough to abandon faith yourselves. Keep thinking. You might get there.
@donkler5476
@donkler5476 5 дней назад
I did it. They can too. I watched debates daily for years, all while praying to this God to show me anything at all for me to know it was real. I was seeking honestly, in pure humility. I just wanted to know what was true. And yeah... there just aren't any good reasons to be a theist, much less a believer in any specific religion.
@tear728
@tear728 5 дней назад
​@@donkler5476 on the contrary there is zero reason to be an atheist. Gripes with religion do not count as reasons to become an atheist
@donkler5476
@donkler5476 5 дней назад
@@tear728 I hope you realize that you’ve already flipped the burden of proof; asking for ‘reasons to be an atheist’ Being a theist is being someone who believes that a God exist. It’s A positive belief in a God which is something that requires positive evidence. And when you examine any of these reasons for believing in a God they always fall apart when the logical fallacies show through. My e mail is in my channel description if you’d like to continue this. I’m down to have a good faith discussion.
@russm4391
@russm4391 6 дней назад
I have noticed with faith that many people who leave want things to be logical and reasonable. Believing is not enough for people who want to know the truth. Religion holds people back from questioning and focuses on blind faith/belief. Even the most knowledgeable Christian scholars end up leaving the religion for many reasons.
@BlasterMaster80
@BlasterMaster80 6 дней назад
Once I started caring if my beliefs where true or not, Christianity stopped having any value in my life. I don't have faith in things I cannot actually know or don't have evidence of. I'm perfectly comfortable saying I don't know, when that's actually the case. So, you can say or argue I have faith in things, but I would argue you're conflating trust with faith and from my understanding faith is a belief without evidence. Where as my trust in things is based on actual evidence not faith.
@bearbro10
@bearbro10 6 дней назад
In the car or in plane you always have atleast 30% faith I'd say, just like some Christians see things that are evidence for the Bible but they have some faith cause it's been 2000 years and alot of information had been lost to time
@tee_saw
@tee_saw 6 дней назад
What do you believe in now?
@StudiesOfTheAncientNearEast
@StudiesOfTheAncientNearEast 6 дней назад
Then your understanding is incorrect. The word for "faith" used in the Bible is "πίστις" which is best understood as "trust". "Belief without evidence" is just an uncharitable misrepresentation of our position to make us appear as ridiculous as possible. A strawman. Were I to extend the same level of charity to the people that do this, I might as well just define "atheism" as "the rejection of truth" therefore im right by default. But as I said, πίστις means trust, and certainly not "belief without evidence". Just consider the following texts: Aristotle, Eudemian Ethics 7.1237b "There is no stable friendship without confidence (πίστις), and confidence only comes with time" Aristotle, Politics 5.1305a "Their pledge of confidence (πίστις)" Antiphon, On the Murder of Herodes 5.93 "Because I have faith (πίστις) in justice" Diodorus Siculus, Library Book 16.43 "Surest pledge (πίστις) amongst the Persians." Herodotus, The Histories 3.7 "Giving to him and receiving from him pledges (πίστις)."
@BlasterMaster80
@BlasterMaster80 6 дней назад
@@StudiesOfTheAncientNearEast It's like you guys don't even read my comment before positing, I already addressed this. If faith just means trust, then why call it faith in the first place; why not just use the word trust?
@rubba6818
@rubba6818 5 дней назад
@@bearbro10 No you are confusing faith (Definition: Complete trust, aka the faith is blind by definition) with trust in evidence. Evidential trust is based on evidence, previous history or airplanes, we know what airplanes are how they work what they do etc. You have a mountain of evidence supporting the statistics that your airplane will work as intended. Trust is trust, but faith is complete trust and blind by definition. Faith is automatically blind. When you have evidences you do not need faith, faith is the weakest position.
@kingofalldashcams7380
@kingofalldashcams7380 5 дней назад
The panel is struggling with this one because there really is no logical answer. Most people believe in the faith they hold because they grew up with it. It becomes "the truth" and the other guy's beliefs seem unusual, strange, and vaguely wrong. At the end of day, our beliefs are stories we tell ourselves to make sense of the world. This person believes a guy came back to life and rose into heaven. This girl believes a guy rode to heaven on a winged horse. This third person believes you only go to heaven for 500 years (eg. some Native tribes). Who is right? Nobody really knows. But none of the magic can be proven with evidence. They are stories.
@freewill8218
@freewill8218 6 дней назад
Grow up.
Далее
Christians Be Cussing?
14:02
Просмотров 72
🤯 #funny
00:20
Просмотров 2 млн
Can Christians Get High?
17:12
Просмотров 537 тыс.
Atheist Asks TOUGH Questions: EPIC Response! (Q&A)
12:20
Don't Make Me Defend Mark Driscoll OR John Lindell
14:05
Ben Shapiro Debates Atheist on Slavery in the Bible
11:56