Why I Don’t Use The ESV Bible 

Glad to hear it!

Very welcome

Not sure

Noted!

that would end up being a lifetime project... I spent 3 nights (or about 12 hours,)... just comparing 2 chapters of JOB.. between the ESV // NASB// KJV....snd noting their differences.. can you imagine doing that and adding the NKJV and the RSV and NIV as well..to the entire Bible....?... that would really be an undertaking...

@@jeffcarlson3269 I was thinking more of the history of the men, movements and manuscripts that eventually brought us the King James Bible. And an explanation of the methodology behind the modern Bibles as well as their underlying Greek texts. Not necessarily every variant.

@@enriquemata8558 oh yes that would be a great study.. hopefully Pastor will find time to make a video along those lines one day... that Would be informative indeed...

@@enriquemata8558 You should check out that movie "lamp in the dark" they did a really good job doing exactly what your describing. Thats if you havent already seen it.

You are so welcome!

Unfortunately no. I have one on books defending it however.

Someone at some point changed from the Geneva Bible to the KJV. Before that, they changed from the Vulgate to the English translations. That's a bad argument to never change English translations of the sword.

That makes no sense, language is constantly changing. Therefore it is a necessity that you change the sword.

@@theextreme7134 well you’re going to hell because Gods word- our sword DOES not change, and will not. So here’s the thing. The Bible that you want to change, as if you actually matter. Well it existed, and people were reading it before you were born. Well, being that, you have no power even over your next breath. You’re going back to the dirt and worms are eating your corpse- Gods word still won’t change. Even while you’re in hell

The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” Gods word. He’s blinded their minds and people don’t realize this is spiritual, and the word is our sword against the enemy. They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If I say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory- that’s the one I’ll stick with till I die!

​@@Proverbspsalmsresearch the mandela effect bible changes. it is the abomination of desolation prophesied. it is also the famine in the land for the word of God prophesied in Amos 8.

I'm sorry to say, but there is no "received text" in English. The KJV was not even wholly based on the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. Rather, much of it was translated from the Catholic Latin Vulgate (from Jerome). Also, the original KJV version (which so many hold dear to them) initially included the fourteen apocryphal books that were only later removed (though these are still found within some Catholic texts). The only "received text" is the original language it was received in (ie Hebrew, Greek, and a bit of Aramaic). All that is needed to find this out is doing a little cursory reading about these subjects. Here is a Wikipedia page about this topic (check the sources at the bottom, as opposed to the text in the actual entry). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version#:~:text=Like%20Tyndale's%20translation%20and%20the,translated%20from%20a%20Latin%20source.

I need to pick up the esv illustrated. Thank you for sharing!

I would like to make clear I read from mainly 3 translations. KJV, NKJV, and ESV. I am open to others I just don't care for NIV, NLT, NASB. I do kind of like the CSB and NET(full notes edition.) I know many people who have been saved by all these translations and to me that's what matters most. GOD bless you all.

I use the ESV. I read the footnotes for the "missing verses" too. I compared many passages between the ESV and NKJV and they are very close.

Close is different.

NASB

God saves People regardless of whether They are reading any version Knowledge comes after Conversion Apostle paul an example!

Later, but I explain why in a few videos

Thanks for sharing!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Any time Pastor!

I can’t remember, but I think I’ll certainly be looking! Oh and Targums can be ok, especially if they’re inspired targums of the NT quoting the old or something.

I’ve got a couple of reviews on here about it. Not quite as accurate.

Yes, I’ve got reviews of it.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa, Please review The Simplified KJV

@@sumeriansumer1622 Already have

Amen!

John, I suggest getting a hold of a Gideons Bible, ESV, which is a unique translation adding back much that was removed. Gideons will be glad to give you one (writing as a Gideon myself :-).

Well enjoy it. God didn’t place something that’s not his word in your heart. But ok. The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” Gods word. He’s blinded their minds and people don’t realize this is spiritual, and the word is our sword against the enemy. They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If I say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory- that’s the one I’ll stick with till I die!

​@@Proverbspsalms Did you really use the word c-r-a-p while trying to convince someone of the Holiness of a certain Bible???

@@AlexMartinez-in5ws whatever I said I said

@@Proverbspsalms I never heard a demon speak in Elizabethan English. Demons weren’t just made up in 1616 with Elizabethan English as their language. Technically demons wouldn’t be speaking English.

You're welcome

What was the motivation? Thank you from a newb! 🙏😊

I have made dozens of videos on the above topics.

I’ve got a review of that somewhere on the channel.

sometime bibles such as Crossway's ESV.. are good if one gets the Study bible editions.. and use them for their commentary.. the ESV Study bible is Loaded with commentary and articles.. and historical info...also Many , many maps inset in the scriptures.. which is a plus if one is really trying to map out for example the plight of David.. or Abraham's travels...the ESV Stidy Bible has way more maps than I've seen in any KJV study biible... now if Crossway would release a KJV double column Study bible.. I'm all in..!..

@@jeffcarlson3269 I agree, the ESV Study Bible is great. I use the notes for reference very frequently. The pictures and in-text maps are amazing too, but I don't really see them that often as I only use it as a reference and don't read through it.

@@GoBroncos9 I do not find myself reading the ESV..thru diligently but I do occasionaly look at the verses...now and again more out of curiosity to how..it compares to a particular KJV verse to see how it could be worded differently.. but as I do this, I do so with some regard to it being a more modern translation and try to bear in mind certain liberties these translators may have taken.. so, even though I read it here and there during my studies.. I do so cautiously.. as I also do with the NASB and the RSV.. and the ASV..and in some regards to the NKJV as well...

Funny that you say that, considering the KJB didn't "lock their text" but rather most KJVs today are the 1789 *revision* of the KJV not the original 1611

Understand he does not. Star Wars he must watch. Hmm

Amen!

You're welcome

I’ve got a video on that. I’m sorry I can’t link it.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa No worries, I found it.

Amen. Great oneness scripture, that 1jn5:7..."these three are one".

@@brianhaley4471 🌹🌹🌹🔥

Brenda, I agree and need 1 John 5:7 in its fullness. It's the first verse I look for (and Acts 8:37 the second) when looking through a new version and it's usually missing (I stick pretty close to the KJV).

Amen!

In numerous places the Bible tells us how to understand his word. By praying, God will reveal it you by and by better than a modern version. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, knowledge and understanding. Ask, seek, knock. Luke 24:45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures. He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Bless you.

@@brianhaley4471 what modern version are you talking about? So are you saying just read kjv and nothing else?

Amen!

I believe... if we are talking about the sin of the lie told by Ananias and Sapphira... we can probably deduce some things... for 1).. Ananias and Sapphira may have been part of the "fold".. but I do Not recall any mention of them being saved or having trusted Jesus as their savior..2) Peter pronounced sentence on them.. and Peter was much more impetuous than our Lord...had it been Jesus.. He may have given them a chance to repent of their sin.. and confess their wrong doing..3).. this was the time of the early church.. and God.. initiated..or gave certain powers to the Apostles.. in order to lay the groundwork for the church's beginning...the Apostles had certain Apostolic "rights".. that Christians are Not gifted with today.. such as pronouncing that kind of judgement on sinners.. though perhaps many wish they did have That power...today..

@@jeffcarlson3269 Christians are not to murder though as that is a sin , so if Peter chose that for them , one God would of had to allow Peter to use his Gid given power to do such a thing and two it would be murder , a sin , and more than that as Jesus told us to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us . When it was brought up to rain fire down like Elijah , Jesus said ye know not what spirit ye are of. The whole thing seems against Christ's doctrine . Unless the point of it is that Peter was still a man , this was a horrible sin and God still used them to spread the gospel. But then I wonder why God allowed it ? Jesus wouldn't cast a stone at a sinner and yet here we have a human apostle who drops two people dead for sin . It seems like they sinned to punish others for sin , unless we are just supposed to be literally sinless which is of course impossible. Another part of me feels like this is people trying to get money , which of course is monumentally messed up . Like give us all your money or die like these . That's obviously not of God or Christ's teachings .

Jon Courson has a great article on this and it's a good read: Hypocrisy Kills: A Topical Study of Acts 5:1-11 Things are not always what they appear to be, particularly in the realm of spirituality. Some years ago, a painting was auctioned for many thousands of dollars. It portrayed a monk sitting at a table with a prayer book before him, his hands folded in the posture of prayer. Upon closer inspection, however, the buyer discovered that the prayer book on the table was not a prayer book at all, but a shallow pan. And the hands folded together seemingly in prayer actually held a lemon. Thus, the picture portrayed not a monk praying, but a man squeezing lemons. So, too, oftentimes, we think, My, that person is spiritual. But upon closer examination, it proves to be a bitter, sour story when we see the real picture. This is precisely what happened in our text concerning the story of Ananias and Sapphira. At this point, the church was experiencing great grace (Acts 4:33). Jews had come from all over the world to celebrate the Jewish festival of Pentecost. During the Feast of Pentecost, thousands were converted to Christ. Apparently not wanting their new brothers and sisters to return to their homes without being instructed and grounded in the Word, the Jerusalem believers pooled their resources and shared with one another in order that the new believers could remain in Jerusalem where they could grow together. Ananias and Sapphira, apparently wanting to fit in and seem spiritual, sold their property but secretly kept a chunk for themselves. As they brought their money to the apostles, Peter asked, “Is this the total amount of the land?” “Certainly,” replied Ananias. And he fell down dead. Three hours later, his wife Sapphira came in. “Tell me, Sapphira,” said Peter, “when you and your husband sold your property, did you bring all the money?” “Yes,” she answered. And like her husband, Sapphira was history. “I don’t understand,” you say. “The Christians were flourishing, and a couple brought some money to the apostles to share with their brothers and sisters. Wasn’t it a little severe to strike them dead because they didn’t give it all? Wasn’t death a rather extreme penalty for fibbing?” The answer to that question lies in the principle of precedence that says: God will make a strong statement at one point in time to be remembered and applied to all points in time. An example of this is seen in Joshua 6. After wandering in the wilderness for forty years, the children of Israel were at last ready to enter the Promised Land. With great rejoicing and anticipation, they crossed the Jordan River only to find the powerful and seemingly impenetrable city of Jericho looming large before them. But the Lord miraculously delivered the city of Jericho into their hands as the walls came tumbling down. Then He said, “Don’t take anything from Jericho. Other cities you can spoil, but let this city be a sacrifice to Me” (see Joshua 6:18, 19). All except one of the Israelites obeyed the Lord’s command. His name was Achan. Seeing the glimmer of gold, the shining of silver, and some Babylonian garments that were the hot threads of the day, Achan thought, What would it matter if I borrowed a bit of gold, took a sliver of silver, and lifted a garment or two? So, he grabbed the goods and hid them under the floor of his tent. The next battle found the Israelites at war with a little town called Ai. It should have been an easy fight, but they got whipped. “What’s going on, Lord?” Joshua cried. “We conquered Jericho in Your Name, but at Ai, we were soundly defeated. Why?” God informed Joshua that sin in the camp had defeated the country-and the one who sinned was to be put to death (Joshua 7:15). “Isn’t that a bit severe?” you ask. No, because in this new country, the Lord wanted to reveal from the very outset how deadly serious He was about sin. Why? Because sin would kill them. Not just Achan, the one who committed the sin, but his whole family as well. Precious people, when you and I sin, other people are bruised and beaten and end up in the pit along with us. That’s why, among other reasons, sin stinks. God made that point very clear in those first days in the new land. “Listen,” He said. “Sin brings pain. It’ll hurt you. It’ll affect your family and others who are linked to you. You’ll end up in the pit.” Now we’re in another new country here in Acts-not a new country physically, but a new country spiritually. The church has been formed as an entirely new entity. And just as sin had to be dealt with severely and pointedly in the Old Testament, so, too, a powerful point is being made in the New Testament. I’m so glad we can study this chapter and see what God thinks and how He feels about sin, because if we were dealt with in the same way that Ananias and Sapphira were, our church would be very small. Certainly, you wouldn’t have a pastor-at least not this one! Think about it: What if, like Ananias and Sapphira, we were struck down for the same sin for which they were struck down-the sin of hypocrisy? Whenever we stood up and sang, “All to Jesus, I surrender; all to Him I freely give… I surrender all, I sur…” Boom! Down we’d go! If we were treated in the same manner as Ananias and Sapphira were, the church would be thinned out real fast! And so God is saying, “I’m going to make a severe point at this point in time in order that you might get the point for all time. Learn the lesson: Hypocrisy kills.” Hypocrisy was the one sin that riled our Lord Jesus. He loved to eat with the sinners. He hung out with the publicans. The tax collectors and prostitutes felt comfortable with Him. But when He said, “Woe unto you…” it was always directed at those who wanted to be thought of as more spiritual than they really were. The word “hypocrite” comes from the Greek word hupokrites, which means “one who is wearing a mask.” It refers to actors who wore large masks on stage in order to be seen by those in the back row. Hupokrites, then, were those who had two faces: one for the stage and one for the street. I am told there is a restaurant in New York City whose business is thriving because of hypocrisy… A couple is seated, and the maitre d’ hands them menus. Both contain the same items, but because the prices listed on the woman’s menu are three times higher than the prices on the man’s menu, when the man says, “Order whatever you want,” the woman is highly impressed. Hypocrisy may be good for the restaurant business, but it is grievous to the heart of God. Psalm 103:14 says the Father knows our frames, He remembers we are but dust. Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 4:7 that we have this treasure, Christ Jesus, in earthen vessels. In other words, God knows we have frailties and earthiness, but it doesn’t bother Him. Jesus loved to be around real people. It was the hupokrites-the religious folks and the play-actors-who were a problem to Him because hypocrisy truly kills. What does it kill? Hypocrisy Kills Your Witness. How many people say, “I’m not going to go to church. I took my car to a mechanic who had a fish in the yellow pages. And man, I got ripped off. He charged high prices and did lousy work, and yet he has a Bible on his desk and his radio tuned to the Christian station”? Or how many make a business deal with one who claims to be a believer and they find out later they were charged exorbitant prices? If you say, “I’m not going to become a believer because of hypocrites,” you will spend eternity in hell with the very hypocrites you hate. So if you don’t like them, get saved, get to church, and get right. Otherwise, you’ll be with them forever. Whenever people say to me, “There are hypocrites in church,” I say, “You’re right. That’s why you will fit right in! We freely acknowledge that we are not even close to perfection.” When people say, “I’m not going to go to church or get saved because of hypocrites,” they’re wrong. Nonetheless, the fact remains that people use that excuse more than any other for not going to church or seeking the Lord. Hypocrisy kills your witness. Hypocrisy Kills Your Joy. Just as Ananias and Sapphira were struck down, so, too, is your joy whenever you’re hypocritical. You become sour. You become analytical. In order to justify your own hypocrisy, you begin to analyze others and see how hypocritical they are that you might feel better about your own hypocrisy. You become a sour, dour believer, soaking in the lemon juice of bitterness. You lose the joy of just being real before the Lord. Hypocrisy Kills Your Peace. Living in hypocrisy, one must always keep his mask on and his guard up. Fearing that someday someone will see the real him, he becomes tense, uptight, and unstable. Therefore, as it did with the early church, great fear should come upon us-the fear of hypocrisy. While such fear could potentially freak us out, in reality it should free us up. You see, when we finally get the picture of Acts 5, we understand that the Lord is asking us just to be who we are. Paul put it this way: “By the grace of God I am what I am…” (1 Corinthians 15:10) Hypocrisy works from the outside in and says, “I’m going to try to be this way, and maybe it’ll sink in a bit.” It’s imitation. Christianity works from the inside out as Jesus says, “I’m going to work within you to do and to will of My good pleasure” (see Philippians 2:13). It’s impartation.

Continued: How I need to understand that the Lord delights in me just the way I am. Those areas that need to be changed, He will change-not by my imitation of spiritual people, but rather by His impartation of the Holy Spirit. I don’t have to play a game. I don’t have to learn the phrases. I don’t have to wear a tie. I can just be who I am, because the Lord looks at me and says, “I know what you are, and I love you. I’ll work within you regarding the areas of your life that need changing. Don’t try to pretend to be something you’re not. Don’t put on airs. Don’t be a church person-learning the phrases and going through the motions.” When this begins to sink in, am I ever free! “You mean, Lord, You love me just as I am, and You want me to be just the way I am, with my humor or lack thereof, with my style or lack thereof? You just love me? You want me to be how You made me? This earthen vessel?” “Yes,” answers the Lord. “I not only love you, I enjoy you-except when you put on an act, pretend to be something you’re not, or try to impress people with a spirituality that isn’t really there.” Hypocrisy will kill your witness as others see the masks you wear and the act you put on. Hypocrisy will kill your joy as you analyze and criticize others in order to justify your own deceit. Hypocrisy will kill your peace as you live in fear that someone will someday see the real you. Put it away. Give it up. Be free! In Jesus’ Name. -jon Courson

@@LastGenGaming675 I agree with you 100%.... I can tell you are very insightgful... and know Jesus.. like I do.... thanks for your comment....

I’ve got a video on errors in the New King James

No, about 70 %

The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” Gods word. He’s blinded their minds and people don’t realize this is spiritual, and the word is our sword against the enemy. They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If I say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory- that’s the one I’ll stick with till I die!

Amen

I agree. It's in the context, which decides word used. The word dictionaries (I assume Strongs or similar) are very subjective, giving only root words. Ive heard degreed modern day Heb/Gk scholars insist the word must be what those sources say even though the context says something totally different. But because they're "scholars" folks just nod their heads in agreement. It's really sad. Yes, translations affect doctrine, what, how people believe.

Amen!

Those are all from corrupted manuscripts from Alexanderia & Westcott & Hort they were agnostic the ones that are good are KJVER, MEV is ok, & WEB is ok too but the Perfect Word of God is KJV

If you use the KJV and want to try a more modern version the NKJV Is excellent.

I’ve done several videos showing the opposite is in fact true. But I’ve tried to study both sides.

Thou

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa "Thou" is the same word as "you." How can you say that?

@@artemusbowdler7508 Thou as intended by the King James translators is Hebrew/Greek singular as in the originals, while you is plural in the translation, again from the originals. This is basic history.

Honestly, if I were to make a new translation of the Bible, I would translate the plural yous as "you all" or "you people."

In many cases, you are correct. But I’ve done several comparisons here on RU-vid where that is not the case. And since we shall live by every Word of God, that’s important. Thank you for watching!

There are definitely changes by changing words and meanings.

There’s places they charge the word believe to obey which IS A DOCTRINAL CHANGE.

I agree with you totally. If you read the preamble to the original KJV, written by the KJV translators, they themselves say the KJV is not a word for word translation. You can find this preamble on line. Additionally, more information about the ancient languages is known now then was available to the KJV translators. Biblical and non biblical documents have been discovered which pre-date the manuscripts used by the KJV translators, which have improved our understanding of the original languages. I am not downgrading the KJV. It is an excellent translation, and nothing can match it for its beauty. We are safe today with the KJV, NKJV, ESV and NASB as being faithful translations of God's word.

@@Blakefan2520 “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.” ‭‭John‬ ‭3:36‬ ‭ESV‬‬ Changed to obedience for salvation instead of believe.

It’s got to do far more with underlying texts than a knowledge of Biblical languages my friend.

I assume you know that deploying the phrase "every man a liar" would also make YOU one, too, right? Of course, to understand what this little passage REALLY means would require that you were familiar with the context in which it was written. Do you know the context that Paul was using it in, or do you just take it as a stand-alone phrase?

The more times you translated the Bible, the more times it has to be corrupted. They KJV goes through several translations, and the ESV goes back to the original and has a closer representation of the ORIGINAL meaning.

Right!

Boom

Amen!

It has been done often over the years my friend.

Unfortunately, that’s usually the way it’s written in Hebrew and Greek. Thee, thou, thine, singular Ye, you, yours, plural Also a Hebrew/Greek construct

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGaWell, I’ll keep at it👍

You do know, that when they translated from the original Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, they literally changed every single word.

I’ve got a video on that.

I’ve done multiple videos historically refuting that false narrative.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa the problem is that the bulk of biblical scholars uphold that view. Establishing an ancient documents. content IS NOT a spiritual exercise, it can be done by an atheist...it's part of ancient history scholarship. I'd accept the longer ending to Mark as authoritative even not Marks ending because it was quoted by Ireneus (according to my Scofield study bible). But there is no conspiracy going on and Satan doesn't have that kind of power, getting people to read the Bible whole is the battle. Sociologically it's easier to see what's going on with KJ only... It's an identity marker that stops the liberalizing slide and that's good, so I'd think I'd agree with most of what you'd believe.

I don’t debate in the comment section, but much of what you said is incorrect.

Friend, I think you may be underestimating the study I’ve done on this subject. I’ve got dozens of videos on the subject. Dozens of books on the subject from varying viewpoints. Taught it at a College level.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa May your heart and mind be opened to our oldest Greek manuscripts from the apostolic fathers discovered in the last couple of centuries which correct the Erasmus critical text which he would certainly have loved to get his hands on the ones we now have. There is no single manuscript from the first century, there is the medieval critical text and the modern critical text. Our modern critical text contains a papyrus of John from the 2nd century. The KJV dudes had no access to that papyrus.

@@SibleySteve I have studied them extensively my friend. See my series on the Papyri and oldest versions on my Biblical Archaeology Today podcast with Steve Waldron. God bless you sir.

Good price!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Like the Bible SAYS,Do not let your left hand know what your right hand IS DOING .

I think it’s called “stealing.” Who cares which translation you use if you are all quick to trivialize one of the Ten Commandments. 🙄

@@steveburg815 God works in mysterious economics

Amen!

Hi James, Would that be the same as "Jesus" in English?

@@brianhaley4471 Jesus was not his given name.. Exodus 3:15 - YHWH. YAHWEH יהוה - YAH Self Exists (Ancient Hebrew) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Qvh8yziVsCE.html Numbers 13:16. YAHOSHEA יהושע - YAH is Salvation. YAHOSHEA is YAHWEH in the FLESH. CREATOR come down to REDEEM his CREATION. Hebrew letters that have the same meaning for 4000 + yrs. The letters in his name. Yad, Hey, Waw, Hey. יהוה. Yad - Hand. Hey - Behold. Waw - Nail. Hey - Behold. YAHWEH BLESS ! יהוה ברכה

@@James41892 Ok, I'm well aware of all this. But is God displeased if I refer to him in my own language? Jesus is the English firm of Yahoshea, correct? Are Koreans displeasing God When they call him Yesu or Yesu-nim? Hispanics pronounce his name Hey-soos; German is Yazua or Yeesus. When Paul preached in Greek to the Greeks, did he pronounce his name in the Hebrew, Yahoshea? Would I be more pleasing to God if I learned and spoke Hebrew? You wrote in Hebrew to me, but I am illiterate in Hebrew. So other than making it known that the Hebrew name for the messiah is Yahoshea, What are you saying?

@@brianhaley4471 If you are aware of all this, then you certainly have the capability of pronouncing YAHOSHEA in english. That is the only name of the Son of God. Names are transliterated not translated...this is to keep their original sound. If you lost that and it's not recognizable it's NO longer the given name. Is Father upset at people who do not seek out his given Name and use it... NAME...Father's WORD. Exodus 3:13-15. Exodus 6:3. Exodus 20:7. Exodus 34:14. Judges 13:17-18. 1 Kings 18:21. Psalms 20:5-7. Psalms 29:2. Psalms 62:5-8. Psalms 68:4. Psalms 83:18. Psalms 104:1-5. Psalms 135:3. Psalms 145:1-2, 21. Proverbs 18:10. Proverbs 25:2 Proverbs 30:4-6. Isaiah 7:14. Isaiah 9:6-7. Isaiah 26:4. Isaiah 42:8. Isaiah 43:10. Isaiah 45:5-7. Isaiah 52:6. Jeremiah 16:21. Jeremiah 23:26-27. Zechariah 14:9. Matthew 5:17-18. Matthew 6:9. Matthew 23: 8-9. John 1:1-5, 9-14,17. Acts 4:12. Philippians 2:9-11. Revelation 1: 1-20.

@@brianhaley4471 Also keep this in mind...if you choose. We know that Jesus is not even 500 years old and is not his given Name. The Antichrist will come to deceive All. I believe he will come in the name the world knows best...Jesus. I believe his Mark will be the cross. We already know his number. See John 5:43. Our Creator's Name is of the utmost importance.

I didn’t claim they were.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa You used this passage to bolster your disdain for the ESV. And now you are denying it.

@@artemusbowdler7508 Not in the least. They translated it w universalism, but that doesn’t mean they are. Manuscripts and translation philosophy.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa You are more clear in this discussion then you were in your video.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Your use of them is misleading.

Variances are a fact. Doctrine and teachings that require a variance are false or not supposed by scripture.

Huh? That’s a weird take. I’ve done dozens of videos showing the manuscript superiority of Recieved text Bibles. I’ve never advocated to keep it because of tradition. You’re sadly mistaken.

Check out my numerous videos comparing them. Thanks for watching!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa I will watch your other videos. I said that based on the fact that the ESV is based in part on older manuscripts than the king James version. No doubt the king James version has been and is still being used by God to bring the message of salvation to people all over the world. I’m a king James guy myself. But I do know that the ESV is based on a lot of older manuscripts.

@@ryanlippoldt6966 I’ve done several videos on manuscript bases etc. Oldest is not always best, as all textual scholars readily admit.

good for you that everyhing the KJB adds to or takes out out from Scripture is accepted by you...

I would Not use the ESV as my main bible.. but I do Not think it is totally way off base... at least No worse than the NASB or the NIV...the ESV has the same complacency as the other non KJV.. bibles.... it seems to lessen the impact or harshness of God's word....perhaps it's society's fault for wanting a bible that coddles them rather than calling them out..

That statement makes zero sense. Sorry.

@@kylec8950 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. Jesus is the Word. John 1:1, Jesus doesn't change Heb 13:8, Mal 3:6 I'm sorry for you if it doesn't make sense to you, I recommend you get saved. Look on RU-vid..... the bible way to heaven. Hope this helps.

@@jeffcarlson3269 I believe the new versions of the bible are a reflection of "society's" aka christians true hatred for the Word of God. They would rather make God in their own image and what they think he should say.

@@preacherrob Thanks "SUPERROB" but I am "saved". Your comment still doesnt make sense. ESV Bible can indeed bring salvation. Don't be a fool.

Many calvinist like both of those translations.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Many Christians do as well.

@@pastorofmuppets777 Yes. I’ve got dozens of videos on the subject of the KJV and modern translations, studied it for 35 years plus. Have studied hebrew, greek, latin. I know a little about the subject. Still studying for sure however!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa My first bible is KJV I love it very much.