Sita's chastity was questioned while Rama was walking on earth. If he did not make these harsh decisions, it would have continued beyond his time on earth. But, because he did what he did, not a single person has ever again questioned Sita's chastity. All the fingers that then pointed at Sita now point at Rama. Sita, went in history as a woman of unquestionable chastity, and Rama, despite all the suffering he endured to uphold Dharma, all his achievements, is still criticized for abandoning Sita. That was Rama's dedication for Sita.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
Actually he is doing his part in destroying it. Before people had confusion about his actions. Now that they know the release reason, they will have more reasons to dislike Rama.
@@82abhilash Nobody can dislike Lord Rama after reading the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana. It is literally impossible to dislike Rama especially after realising the fact that Lord Rama suffered because of us i.e humans.
@@jaydutta7711 Lord Rama suffered because he believed it lead him to greatness. It did not. Everyone knows that. Ultimately he committed suicide in shame.He did not suffer because of us. He suffered for the sake of his reputation. He was a slave of his reputation. He would have even sold his own mother for his reputation if it came to that. He certainly drove his brothers, his wife, his father and his devotees to suicide.
I feel really bad for sita no matter what reasons you give that why ram left sita. Sita had suffered a lot. First without home, then without safety, then without husband and having 2 kids without her family. I hope her soul is fine!!
Ikr. No matter how much they say "Shri Ram felt very bad that he left sita in forest" Blah blah, it still doesn't justify the fact that mata sita had to endure so much torture both physically and mentally. A princess who had to endure manual work all her life after marriage 🙇🙌.
I understand. It is therefore I am told that to this day, parents do not name their newborn daughter child as Sita, fearing that she may face difficulties later in life. But Sita's story in itself is that of commitment (spent 14 years along with her husband in exile and in isolation in Lanka), motherhood (bringing up twins on her own) and sacrifice (not reuniting with her husband but letting the earth consume her mortally to return where originally she was found as child) . Many woman who have faced personal difficulties in their own life have drawn strength from that story to face them.
Namaskaram Sir for the entire content, the new playlist titled "Buddhi" and your vast knowledge of exact studies and research explained in most simple loud-n-clear manner. Such inputs are most required for many like us to understand our basics well hence thank you and best wishes for your future endeavors JaiSreeRam
Thanks to this channel I had the motivation of reading a Critical Translation in English of the Valmiki Ramayana. I just finished the first two Kandas: Bala Kanda and Ayodhya Kanda. Going to the source has been an eye opener on Rama's personality, all the people around him and important events that happened in these two first parts. This topic about leaving Sita is quite contentious, because of the historic context when it happened. I'm looking forward to read everything myself to come to my own conclusions, based upon the values of Sanatana Dharma, my own knowledge and the ancienct wisdom of Bharat. Thanks for another great short docu.
@@nalinakshitr5424 Namaste! I'm not a bro, I'm a sis 😂. I'm reading Valmiki Ramayana with the translation by Bibek Debroy from the Sanskrit Critical Edition.
What do you mean by "pure". Are you talking about purity in body or mind? Sita was not raped. Sita was pure in body and mind, still Rama abandoned her because she was suspected of having an impure body, not an impure mind. Is that enough reason to abandon your wife. Let us assume that she has an impure body. Is the impurity because of rape of adultery. If it was adultery, then she had both impure body and mind. But the purity of her mind was never in question. So it was always about her body. Let us assume that she was actually raped. She will have an impure body but a pure mind. Enough reason to abandon?
My age 80. In my age of 28, my friend lay his hands on my wife in my absence. She escaped. But coming know from neighbours and others, i sent my friend away and never insulted my wife, because it was not her fault. She took big camfour and lit it on her hand burning for 3 minutes. She was not at fault. Mother Seetha did walk into fire which 33 crore gods witnessed and she came out perfectly. We are well today without disease. I never fell for neighbours or others, what they will say. Mother seetha was greater than Rama because her consience was very clear. If i was rama, on public critic, i will go with my wife to forest/ vaalmiki ashram and stayed away from world, to respect to my conscience rather than people around. After my death, i will be blessed. Not exajuration. To day my wife is sought by relation for her blessing, as what blesses it happens.
Thank you for providing clarity on the background on agni pravesham. With all the explanation it is possible to accept Rama's situation before at the time of apni pravesham and Sita abandonment. Yet, what is inexplicable is Rama's decision to ask Sita to prove herself again even after agni pravesham+ balmiki muni testament in the raj sava. There is no doubt that after proving oneself to be right so many times, it was the correct decision for Sita to leave Rama and reunite with her mother Dharitri. Rama perhaps crossed the limit there. By this time the tests she had gone through not enough to satisfy the populus of her satitva?
He did all these things for society not for himself ok, stop believing fake feminist tv serials, all these things were his leelas and people like us with limited minds cannot understand his leelas
@@muskantiwari9877problem is that society is fucked up and he supported that nonsense. The issue is that he could not stand up for his pious wife and succumbed to the lowly thought process of society. Raja should be the one who lives his life as an example of truth or righteousness. It seems to me that he failed in that regard. He may be maryada purushottam, but failed as a leader king.
@@debayansarkar4699no I don't think he failed, he saved Sita maa because u can't shut up people's mouth. Let's say lord Rama don't let Sita maa go away and they live all together then again in this yuga we people will be discussing about Sita maa. But rn we all are discussing about lord Rama. It's Ram's reputation which some not even 1% of that character people questioning!!!
@@diti4192even in this yuga the protagonist and the person who is taking the seat at the head of religious sentiment is Ram himself. Let's say he did the right thing, but what message or precedence does it set for the society to follow? Statistically which sex is still the oppressed sex? I am not discounting all females as pious, but the precedence of his decision is far reaching, that's where I say he has possibly failed. He is probably the best, loyal, parakramshali and dedicated husband possible.
Thank you very much for you efforts and sharing the knowledge for the benefit of people. This topic of separating from Sita mata is heart wrenching for every Sita-Rama worshiper. Also it is one of the hottest topics in woman-lib. For an ordinary man/woman it is difficult to fit i Rama's mold. In the tradition of of Raghukula, shri Rama chose to follow the path of his ancestors. The debate is not closed.
Ordinary men and women have no difficulty seeing that what Rama did was beyond despicable. Even if we assume the worst, even if we assume that Sita was raped (which is not true), even if we assume that, it does not justify Rama abandoning Sita.
Rama got Yogavasishtam even before marriage. That means he was aware that even sastravasana has to be given up ultimately, how come Dharma became paramount? In Bhagavatham, Ramayana reference comes after Sankhyam, which finds a mention later in Krishna's Bhagavat Gita. Ramayana placed in between two great thoughts pays lip service to Dharma which is only a path to the Ultimate. I believe that the mention of such a sequence is deliberately placed to start an enquiry into a new Paradigm shift to start questioning the path, for that matter any path, which pushes whimsical notions.
I have utmost respect and devotion towards Bhagavan Ram and Sita Maa. But the sufferer is always a woman in all the epics. We never looked from the pov of Sita Maa what she might have gone through. Even after coming back to Shri Rama, she had to go through all these. Similarly in Mahabharata, Pandavas always kept quiet even at the time when Draupadi was in danger, only to protect Dharma and his morals. How is Dharma retained by letting their women get exploited ? I am a devotee of Shri Krishna. I am young and I might be wrong, please correct my mistakes if any. Also these are my genuine curiosities, not influenced by leftists or anti hindu propaganda. Hare Krishna🙏
Shri Ram ne kabhi bhi maa sita ko nahi choda tha.dekhye ramayan shiv dvara maa paravati ko sab se pahle kahi gayi thi ramayan sanched mei Raj yog sikhati hai shri ram hamari pavitr atma ko darshate hai aur maa sita kundalini ko ramayan ke saat kand saat chakra ko represent karte hai.maa Parvati ne ye kahani sunne ke baad shiv se kaha ki ab une ye kahani pratyaksh me dekhni hai isliye Vishnu ne shiv jo unke bhakt bhi hai aur Swami bhi hai unke liye prithvi par janam liya.
@Digvijay Patil ohk on this I have one question.. Agar koi daas ban gya hai kisi ka to kya wo apni biwi ki kapde sabke samne utarne deskta hai? And wo bhi infront of whole sabha.. !!!
I have an answer. You mentioned that in the end, it's the woman who takes the brunt and suffers. No , if you look at sri Rama's story, it's he who suffered the most because he had to part with that who is priceless for him. Sita had to face trials and tribulations until she entered agni, but Ram until his death much after sita's agni pravesham.
@Digvijay Patil I understand everything you are saying but just imagine this in this era everything same happening in this time in which we are living right now ... Is this digestible??? I got your point that you agree women can't be disrespected even she is a daas.. But just for the sake of their so called dharma which is really non understandble.. Like they can gamble their family but still it's a dharma!!!!!! But just for the sake of this they let everything happen... Lord krishna had to come coz he had no choice but by himself protecting draupadi.. He knew everything happening was wrong... Just imagine if shri krishna wouldn't be there for her... What would happen... And then imagine this in our present time... As a women I can't imagine this if it became reality in front of hundreds of men.
@Digvijay Patil no no I meant was they already did adharma by gambling everything they had including family... And still I don't understand which dharma they were all sticking to by not saying anything... Obviously krishna bhagwan was their to establish dharma and even make them realize what they were calling and meaning dharma was not real... And By keeping silence in front of injustice is no dharma.. But may be i dont know the depth of scriptures.... You may know better... But as a woman I really just got Disheartned by knowing these things.... So its ohk you have your opinion and i have my own so it's fine 👍
*As I write and read 'one must read Ramayanam along with Vasishtayogam without Vasishtayogam Ramayanam is just a kind of western story. Howmany times Seetha go through fire in Ramayana ? Its actually two times , One when Rabhana came to abduct her by the command of her husband she entered into fire and hide herself and appear as Mayaseetha. Rabhana abduct that maya Seetha into Lanka and the power of MayaSeetha destroyed Lanka, Rama cannot receive Maya Seetha as his wife if he does that then Kingdom also could be destroyed. But Rama said to Seetha to burn Maya by going through fire and came back as real Seetha.*
If you are a purist of Valmiki Ramayana and want to stick to the original text and would not want interpretations no matter how logical they are within the realm of decency and with a staunch Hindu ethos then stop calling Uttara Kanda as Uttara Ramayana since Maharishi Valmiki never called it so...
To the point with references. We cannot answer such questions until we understand the nuances of emotions going through his mind at that moment as a King.
Lord Rama loves Sita maa always. Even today everyone questions lord Rama decision and degrades him down just like this boy abhilash is doing ,going to everyone's comment section and replying with same words - reputation, etc etc.
@@82abhilash Who wants reputation? Does the God almighty who created everyone on earth want reputation? Your choice doesn't make any sense. God does not want reputation because God doesn't care about reputation. He only cares about the well-being of his creation, and that too, only for the good people; everyone else can go to hell for their karma. That's why God is always great and will always be great for eternity. Hail God almighty Rama.
Sir, one clarification: when someone comments on the queen, is it not the king's duty to explain what has actually happened instead of going by what was commented. In general, kings needs to analyze the statement made by any person ( sita, in this context) and rama needs to explain it to the person who commented. If he punished sita by hearing some words by a random person, then it may prove that the person who commented is right. I am just thinking that the king could have gone as per dharma by proving/disproving the statement in the court before taking the decision.. please help me to understand this concept
See, from what I understand, politically there are some rules that a ruler must follow for the dharma to function properly, it's not as simple as just proving his point and moving on. Rama is a king, not a commoner. For instance, if you look at this scenario from today's point of view, why do we think our government doesn't accept the women back who were forced to join ISIS, but have now realized and want to return. The women's parents still plead our government to bring them back. Why do you think our government doesn't consider their pleas? They are brain washed people, they may pose a threat to the country in the future. It's for the safety and security of the country. Similarly, maa Sita was in captivity with the enemy country as well. The women who were in captivity in Syria were common people. But, in Rama's scenario, Maa Seeta was going to become queen and rule the country, probably a major part of the earth, back then. How serious should a king be about this? After the abduction of Seeta, it's become a political thing now, no more a personal issue for Rama. She is his dear wife and he knows very well about her, but there's nothing personal for a ruler who puts his life before his country. Another point in my understanding is, it's not good for the king to have emotional weaknesses any time in his life. It's very dangerous and there's 100% chance for the enemy countries to take advantage of this. So, it's very important for Rama to prove to his citizens that he has no personal weaknesses, and his country's well being is his foremost responsibility. It's the personal sacrifice a king has done for his dharma as a ruler of a country. Rama is dharma personified, that's the greatness of our Rama.🙏
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision….. Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
I think i might have a good enough explanation...at least something which satisfies me and makes sense. After the war, lord rama and maata sita were coronated king and queen. There was celebration all around in Ayodhya! And the epic of lord ram's battle against raavana spread like wildfire. And of course people, i assume, got to know about maata sita's agni-pravesha which was proof enough of her chastity and purity. But you see my friend, we live in a society and so did the people at that time. Gossip is not something one can really fight against, it's a coward of an enemy, but unkillable all the same, immortal even. And people gossiped, in-spite of the truth. And the dhobi was just more vocal than your average citizen but even he ,I assume, would falter and curse himself for saying what he did if he actually met lord rama and maata sita in person. Lord rama heard about the way the public talked about his wife, the queen and questioned her chastity. How do you think he felt about it? for a man who had been through so much suffering, even going as far as to indirectly make maata sita, his love, his wife, his very life undergo an agni-pravesha just for the sake of his people so that they never doubt her, this must've been absolutely heart wrenching. Rama failed. The scion of ikshvaku, the very incarnation of Mahavishnu, the preserver, was defeated. Now, could he have given an explanation? absolutely so! punished the dhobi and whoever else for talking ill about the queen? i mean Rama would never have even thought about it but you know how cruel kings can be! But one must realize that the agni-pravesha was the absolute pinnacle of proof and nothing could top that. So rama did the one thing only he could. He sent maata sita away. And look at all the hate he gets even now for what he did. Does anyone ever question maata sita's chastity now in modern times? No. But do some people absolutely abhor lord ram? Yes , and so did i for a long time now! That is how great Lord rama is! Some might say he failed as a husband, but i think not. if anything he failed in love, he couldn't be with his beloved but he made sure that her honour was intact and he beared the brunt of misfortune. It has taken me literal years to understand our lord's actions. JAI SHRE RAM!
@@achyuthanand5006 Yes, Rama did not fail. Atleast for maa Sita, Rama is never a failure, and Rama knows that. But, inspite of sacrificing so much, the society still judges him. As far as his love for his wife is concerned, who are we as a society to judge. This society never understands. Rama after he orders Lakshman to leave her in the forest, also makes sure that she's left nearby Rishi Valmiki's ashram so she'd be taken care of. People don't recognize these gestures and still judge his love towards his wife. One can understand Rama only by reading Valmiki Ramayan. Even I used to argue a lot with my mother when young. But now I understand that people need to have lot of maturity to understand both "Raja Ram" and "Sita Ram".
@@DieNetaDie Talks have initiated between India and Sri Lanka recently but not much has been finalised. On the other hand, India and Nepal had already signed the agreement.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn Thankfully, our common history is all around us and cannot be dinied. The only thing remaining seems for us Nepalies to do our part and return our country to being a Hindu Kingdom. :)
There are some neo Buddhists who are started talking against sanatan Dharma. Plz make to Doc about to show the similarities between Sanatan Dharma & Buddhism.
I m 61 year old, I have learnt our Sanatani culture and Dharma FROM project shivoham, praveen Mohan, j sai deepak, Dr. Anand , Sri Ram Chakradhar, vinod Anna of String, I bow down to them.
@@papaRodanbecause the god you have talked about have given us a choice that we are allowed to pray to anyone as long as we do what is right and never go on the oath of wrongness
Even today, the other religion people troll many of the hindu Gods but no one says a single word against the character of sita... This was the actual intension of Srirama... He always wanted to safeguard her reputation...
She is actually protected by rama.. Questioning character of woman is just killing woman with no weapon.. This thing is understood by Lord Ram... He knows that she is fire and nothing can burn her.
@@ranirathi3379tell me one thing. If he wanted, he can enjoy with 100 s of virgin girls daily in his kingdom. But why did he fought for Sita and gathered army and built ramasethu for seetha even he don't know about her virginity?? He became villain for that then if he went kingdom without seeta he can enjoy as he wants
I watched Uttara ramayanam video both in English and Telugu. According to me it is the best documentary on Sri Valmiki Ramayanam with facts. Once again Thank you sir for encouraging me to Study Sri Valmiki Ramayanam, I'm currently in Kishkinda Kanda, Sir I request you to make a video on Kishkinda Kanda 40-43 Sarga. It describes the geography of the world at that time. I'm curious that are those places still exist today?? i'm trying to find out but I have limited resources and lack of sanskrit Knowledge to view another scripture. If you have time please do consider my request.
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision….. Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
@@rajeshkumar98769 oh God I don't want to argue whether Uttara Ramayanam is written by Valmiki Maharishi or not check his documentary then you will be clear or else even if you read Bala Kanda of Valmiki Ramayanam then you will get to know.
Uttara ramayanam is the reason that Rama fell from grace. It is not part of Tulasi Ramayan precisely because this truth had to be concealed. By the time of Tulasi Das, Ramayana was already unpopular. He revived it by writing in the local language and leaving the last book out.
Raam never leaved ma sita. All ramayna written before 11th ce doesnt have last kand its complated after raam return to ayodhya. Oldest ramayna found is belonge to 6th ce which doesnt have last kand and also all expart axcept that baal kand and uttar kand were add after and not the part of original valmiki ramayna. If u buy valmiki ramayna today and open first page 3 page its written that all expert says that baal kand and uttar kand were not the part of original ramayna and the give many example for that. Writting were completly drifrent and cant be written by sage valmiki. Many example given in first 3 pages of valmiki ramayna even today eara any body can read it.
The people of Ayodhya didn't have any way to confirm that the blood line carried by Maa Sita is pure.....from their position the inheritor of Rama is going to become their King and they have a right question the purity of blood line as it was the only criteria to become a King and those times King was the fulcrum on which the whole society revolved.....the all powerful King
Despite everything being explained well in the video, people are still asking stupid questions. Many times the circumstances are such where the difference between righteousness and unrighteousness becomes very less, in that situation Shri Ram took a decision which a common man can never take. If today's young generation is so stupid that they cannot understand this, then it is not the fault of Shri Ram. (The respect for Shri Ram has increased in my heart) I don't know whether Ramayana is true or not, I maintain a neutral viewpoint between theists and atheists. But after reading Ramayana from beginning to end, there is no doubt left in my mind about the character of Lord Rama. I respect Shri Ram and will always do so.
In addition to my previous comment, it also reflects that the whole narrative is very emotionally made decision. Just like how many of us, who intend to be righteous and idealistic in nature, believe we are in the right path n this is how it will be right. But, while walking that path, we hurt a lot of those who are not on the same page even if they are right . May be in the assumption and presumption of us always trying to prove to be right, we too make mistakes. And sometimes really costly mistakes unaware of what to actually do! We are always forced to believe rama is a good boy and he listens to people n follows dharma. How can a good leader just be a listener. Shouldn’t be also carry his own opinions and influence people the right way to think and direct them towards growth? Similar examples are there in many stories, Like, Shakuntala Devi and her husband (how she was abandoned), Later, in Jodha Akbar (idk the exact factual info, but through the movie n some references, how Jodha was questioned and she left home n then Akbar went back to get her when he realised), So it’s always about a man committing a mistake in haste, or in the fear of society’s failure of judgement that a woman is questioned and punished! For a man to re-realise her worth n purity? It’s probably the repeated pattern n mistake . May be it’s time to advocate the righteousness by actually giving a direction to the society on how to judge, how to not fear society’s judgement, how to not misguide women to bear the wrath of all the patriarchal forces for her to still prove her innocence! It needs a severe change before propagating more on how it was righteous at all. May be the take away could just be, “A man like rama has also committed a mistake, and one must learn to not repeat the same pattern. Atleast rise up and be more bold to face the world together rather than making harsh self made decisions in the name of righteousness!
Rama was spineless enough to not show the true dharma to the public. Already Sita had done agnipariksha and the public still is questioning her chastity. The public will never learn and will gossip however much Rama do anything about it. Because that's how public are, they gossip and poke into things. And to implore further, imagine Sita was raped and to take it more further, imagine she got pregnant from that. Can Rama be the real Puroshottama and show to the people that it was not her fault. Even if her 'purity' is gone, it's not her fault and we must take care of the weak and the victims and not push them off like garbage. He could have showed a new and improved Dharma for his people. As Dharma keeps changing according to time and place, Dharma doesn't have to be a static entity. Rama was a coward and a fool. Coward for not doing the right thing. Fool for taking gossip among public seriously than teaching them about truth, critical thinking and empathy. End of story.
@@slowdown7276 I agree. I wouldn’t like to ill speak or call names. But it’s just not righteous from all the stories we have been listening to. This story always invokes the idea that only when a woman is put through misery from an external place, a man is willing to do whatever n sail oceans. But if it’s because of him? Is he willing to take the charge? That’s the only answer I’m waiting to know if this story has anything more to offer. If not, it’s not right.
your comments relieved me…yes why to get into that thinking of choosing between praja and wife. Why womens character is always in question. You being so powerful and enormous god couldnt save your wife from Ravan and later question her chastity. It hurts my heart..if a man like lord Ram couldn’t save Sita Ma ..then its better to be self reliant like Sita Ma who lived alone in Valmiki ashram and become self dependent..thats my take from Ramayan❤
The problem lies not only with those not reading the scriptures and understanding their essence,we have a leader who follows Gandhian idealogy which took us to the brink saying unabashedly what is there in the murthis and stones.? We are being pushed in to the same situation which led to the partition of this great country.
Log kabhi Shri Ram ki peeda nhi samajh payenge unko Mata Sita ko apne se durr karne mein sab se zyada dukh hua tha logo ki bhi koi galti nhi vo bhi uss Praja ki tarah hi hai unka kaam hi hai sabke upar sawaal uthana Shri Ram ke samne Raj Dharma aur Pati Dharma dono tha to unhone Mata Sita ko safely Valmiki ji ke Ashram bhej diya jo relation mein Mata Sita ke bhai lagenge kyuki dono hi Bhoomi Devi se prakat hue the... sabse, badi baat to ye hai ki kabhi kisi ne apne aap ko ek bechare ya victim ki tarah nhi dekha kya Sita Mata ne Ramji ko blame kiya ? ya unke bete Luv - kush ne ? yaa Ram ji ne kabhi Mata Sita ko blame kiya ? ye comments ke log apni jeev buddhi se itna hi soch sakte hai aur ab to Kaliyug hai log aur bhi buddhihin hai Sanskrit aati nhi Dharma ka matlab pata nhi bas social media pe idhar udhar se dekh ke apna perception banaate hai ye log
Efforts are indeed commendable. Even though he does not realize it, he just proved what a loser Rama is. He abandoned his wife to protect his reputation and lost both wife and reputation. So, double loser.
@@82abhilash Mind your language 😡 How dare you to call an AVATAR of the Supreme God Vishnu a loser!!! ?? Lord Rama is a super Victorious Hero and he will always be for the eternity. If anyone read the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana, they cannot stop themselves from loving Lord Rama from the bottom of their heart. Hail Lord Rama 🙏
@@jaydutta7711 Sorry, he is not a loser. He is a double loser. He abandoned his wife to preserve his reputation and lost both his wife and his reputation. Finally he committed suicide, so triple loser. He is not an Avatar, he is not a supreme lord, he is a fake hero. Valmiki Ramayana reveals just as much. The only bigger losers are his devotees.
@@marymurphysinha9370 No sister. The video explains nothing. It is the same old pattern repeatedly mindlessly and without thought. Reading the Ramayana makes civilized people rightly disturbed. Because people don't actually believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped. Do you believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped?
And as always thanks for uploading "Doc Film". Thats what i have been crying about since last 6-7 doc films.. this is what we look for in your documentaries. No rightist movement, no chellenges to Leftists.. Just pure and simple slap on the face of misunderstandings and misconceptions through Scriptures "As it is". i know from my heart deep down, "Buddhi" will become a socurce to go to for generations to come.... Bravo.. Your die hard fan.. UD....
Jai sitaram Both are one Like lord shiva Parvathi Sri Rama loves Sita matha more than anyone Today everyone are pointing on the great Lord Ram No one can be lordram We all believe Sita mata as great godess Great women Though Lord ram is great today some people are pointing Lord Ram decisions He is one ,he is great He killed Ravana and brought sitha matha back No king would do this thing When Ravana kidnaped Sita mata Lord ram cried a lot If Lordram is a judgemental person towards Sita mata Then he don't cry and search for Sita mata Then only he leaves Sita mata But no Lord ram is great he killed Ravana and protected his wife According to valamiki ramayana LORD RAM IS GREAT HUMAN AND GREAT KING We all should know our hindu stories too Purananas too each and every purana Dasavataram Mathya avatar Karma avatar Varahaa avatar Narshimha avatar Parasurama avatar Vamana avatar Sri Rama chandra avatar Sri krishna avatar Buddha avatar Kalki avatar If you study Dasavataram stories Then you can understand the greatness of lordram and his decisions towards Sita mata Lord Ram is Lord Vishnu avatar Godess sita is Godess lakshmi God is great Lakshminarayana Sitaram As a king he took that decision to send Sita mata to forest But as a husband he cried more more more for Sita mata He love Sita mata Sita mata loves Ram They both are one Even while performing yagna He brought a golden statue of Sita mata That is greatness of lordram Just some people are pointing on lordram Without knowing the truth The God Love The god play The god ideas There is a big reason behind it Some people see Lord ram as human and a great king Some people see Lord ram as god He is absolutely god The great lordram By watching some movies or some serials People started to judge even Lordram How foolish is it He is our Lordram One and only one Whatever lordram does Is absolutely right If he didn't take agniparishka decisions and sending sita mata to forest even still today also People Jude Sita mata purity At Ramayana time there is no TV or internet to understand and show the agniparishka to each and every citizen Even Lord ram didn't take the decisions towards Sita mata Even today also we all judge sita mata character But without any doubt We all praise Sita mata as maha pathivratha We all feel sad about her Because she suffered a lot We all judge Lordram for his decisions But we never judge Sita mata So please try to understand There is one and only one great king Great human Great Husband Great god Lord Ram Sri Rama chandra prabhu Jai ho Sri Rama chandra Prabhu ki Jai Jai Jai sitaram
The morality of the story is that a Ruler should serve the interests and the demands of its people first, Just like a President or a PM. And this is why Rama has to turn back Sita to meet the disapproval and suspicions of his people. The story revolves around Raj Dharma, If Rama as a King didn't banish Sita, he would have lost all respect and dignity in the society as a Ruler. What is the Duty of a King to serve the interests and the demands of his people first, not to be self-centered and become a family man.
Bro please do a video on earth shape in hindu scriptures and planets described by Hindu scriptures. Difference between the words. 1) bhugol- sphere 2) bhumandal- circular plane 3) bhulokh- plane of existence or dimension. Each word is used in different places of our scriptures So please do a video on earths shape in Hinduism.with scripture references Please clarify this
the easiest way one could understand the thing is... a female cant be accepted if she's been with another guy... back then.. those 1600 girls were kidnapped n forcefully married to a demon.. when krishna killed the demon.. n freed those women.. society wasnt ready to accept them... so krishna accepted them as his part of life ( not exactly wives) but to live n spend lives together woih him.. its not 16k its 1600..
Mother Sita is not an ordinary woman, she is Lakshmi ji who came to earth with Lord Vishnu of her own free will. Do you think whatever happened in Ramayana did not happen as per her free will? Going into exile with Shri Ram, being kidnapped by Ravana or her abandonment by Shri Ram, all these are part of the drama created by Shri Vishnu and Vishnupriya. I don't understand why people are so stupid, for me there is nothing to doubt here.
AgniPravesam has been well covered..thanks for that. BUT... IT'S UNACCEPTABLE ON RAMA LEFT MAA SITA IN FOREST. YOU'RE BELIEVING "UTTARA RAMAYANAM " , JUST BECAUSE THE WORD "UTTARAM" HAS BEEN MENTIONED IN "VALMIKI RAMAYANAM "..... THIS IS NOT AT ALL LOGICAL.... EVEN IF YOU BELIEVE, IT'S NOT AT ALL LOGICAL TO BELIEVE A DHARMIC KING LEFT HIS WIFE EVEN AFTER SHE PROVES HERSELF BY AGNIPRAVESAM..... My opinion, Reconsider & Rethink
Please someone clarify my doubt Though I'm Hindu I have some doubts regarding our Sanatana Dharma, among all I want to know about moksha As we learn from Vedas that moksha can attain only when we don't have desires from materialistic world isn't it? that includes relations, marital life and also sex then why our Hindu god's have wives?? Why God is in marital status I'm not opposing our Sanatana Dharma but want clarification I'm asking you this question because you read so my Hindu puranas and Vedas Hope you clear my doubt..
*@RenukaLakshmiNarayana* I have a rational authentic scripture based answer to your question. So let me answer your question on my favourite topic about God. First of all rejecting the materialistic desire is applicable to the creations of God only, to realise the ultimate reality which is God himself, for salvation. So these requirement is not applicable to the creator i.e God since the God is everything, he created everything for this subject matter. As we learn from the Vedas that MOKSHA can be attained by mortals only when they don't have the desires from materialistic world that includes relations, marital life, in order to focus on the God to get salvation. Now the question is whom will the GOD focus on, and for what? I mean the God doesn't need salvation, he is the *salvation provider,* he is omnipresent everywhere, so why should these requirements be applicable to the God? 🤦🏻♂️ To understand that clearly, you should know that the God is not a man neither a wómen, the God is a genderless Supreme entity who created all womén & men including all living creatures and everything in the universe. So the God doesn't have any sexual partner i.e wife like us human beings. The God's consort is actually a manifestation of his own energy which represents his self-sufficient capabilities. For example, goddess Lakshmi is a feminine manifestation of God Vishnu's own feminine energy, not his wife like us human beings. Because we man don't create our wife, but God Vishnu created his own consort Lakshmi out of himself. That's why you see her always worshipping Vishnu by serving his sacred feets with her absolute devotion, as she is half self of Vishnu herself. And goddess Lakshmi also represents the Prakriti and prakriti always serves the PARAMATMA i.e God Vishnu himself. It is said that God Vishnu's all expansions worship him just like all demi-gods and goddesses worship him. Hope that cleared your doubts regarding your question. Hare Krishna 🙏
@@jaydutta7711 thankyou so much for your clarification. . I will be reading your message again and again to know the complete meaning.. Om Namah Shivaya 🕉️
Jai Shree Ram. Whatever hardships that came his way, he always dealt it in a controlled manner, to spread Dharma. Shree Ram is a perfect role model for everyone.
Dharma doesn't expect perfection from its devotees because, Gods themselves are not perfect in that sense...its perfect to be imperfect. But, Maa Sitha was SriDevi Lakshmiji herself...and after all that bloodshed for her possession is it wise to sacrifice such a divine wife just because, someone let out his sharp-tungue to opinionate rudely that too in Thretha yuga? There can be 100 different views but, a king who values too much on somebody's cruel-comment should give-up his throne and continued his married-life peacefully. Lord.ShreeRam couldn't have continued without Maa Sithaji alone. It thus happened in 26th MahaYuga.
This is what the God Rama wanted. He completely achieved his mission as a Great Husband and as a great Lover. God Rama has completely wiped out the blames on Sita Devi , instead, he created a sympathy on her by making Sita do Agni Pariksha and by sending her to the Valmiki ashram in the forest that he took all the blames on him which is actually happening right now that we are all pointing our fingers on Rama even after all these years as Ramayana was happened some lakhs of years ago, we're still blaming Rama but not Sita. Ram's mission achieved. Absolutely no doubt nobody could have loved Sita Devi so much as Ram did.Can't hold my tears anymore.
Someone clarify me: To save his public image ram had site to give agni pariksha? Didn't he wronged sita? Even after that he left her which is even more ridiculous. He knew sita was pure so couldn't he had told public about this instead of wronging her? No offence just confused.
From my understanding, the immolation was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. You must also consider this: would the people believe Rama? Obviously Rama would defend his wife, so his credibility on the situation is not that believable. Perhaps if Ravana came and said what happened, the people would believe it. Also, keep in mind that the Ramayana is a narrative poem. Events may not have been added to the poem if they didn’t have any effect. Hope this helps.
*@shubhamtariyal439* Here is my rational answer to your question. I guess you are terribly misinformed about Ramayana and Lord Rama. Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire. Hence Sita's last sacrifice was not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
Sir the reason of shri ram leaving sita while she was pregnant is mentioned in Padam puran, Patalkhand, adhyay 125, Page no: 518,519,520 (geeta press gorakhpur) Here it is told that mata sita was cursed by a parrot the she will have to bear the pain of separation from her husband during her pregnancy as she was forcefully trying to keep that parrot in same situation.
Instead of blaming us, human, who unknowingly accused Sita just because words from that washman and it's the real reason of why she's banished, we blame Rama, how irony... And I said this as a 21 y.o. Thai girl who struggling on learning India culture but at least really into it. Plus I love Ramayana since I was a little child.
Uttar kand (referred to here as Uttar Ramayan) is not part of original Valmiki Ramayan. It has been added later to satisfy the questions and curiosities of people. The style of the shlokas in Uttar Kand added in Valmiki is also very different to all other kands. It genuinely only appears in Tulsi Ramayan.
@@sneed1764 dharma isn't a set of rules... It varies from person to person... Yet the karma of a being decides the future... As a king, ram choose dharma.. even knowing that his karma gonna cost him everything.. but yet for the sake of Kingdom n societies he choosed what was the most right thing that time..
@@sneed1764 n see the most profound impact of ramayan on societies n civilization of bharat is that... If one couple marries they tend to live eachother for rest of their lives.... Yes it seems opposite to the karma of sri ram but not the values addressed by Sri ramayan
Creating the Buddhi Playlist is indeed very commendable!👏 Thank you for this kind of a reference guide which will prove helpful to the current and future generations as well! Respect to you 🙏
My football coach used to take all the criticism of players performance on himself just to protect them from all the scrutiny from people.. My point is, Rama did exactly that to protect Ma Sita.. People now saying whatever they want to say to Rama, but no one is saying anything to Ma Sita.
as a human avatar.. one has to go through all kinds of human emotions even if its vishnu or shiva.. the process of losing someone is essential... its life
Does this mean if Rama were in case born as ordinary man he would have accepted Sita ? He is both king and a husband so how can he justify both roles here. Also it gives message to society that anything bad happens to your wife you must leave her as she is impure though she is not at fault. Ramayana in this aspect certainly is not kind to women. But the only excuse is this happened in different times and we don’t know exactly how people lived.
I have one big qoustion, after saving ma sita why lord Ram took her back to his kingdom? Why didn't he leave her that moment ? Why after so much time in uttharakanda only after she gets pregnant? ? For me Ram is a righteous man and also an unconditional lover and he respects women aswell. Somehow we still can't understand the reason behind this logic. That's my opinion
after agni pariksha... Ram assured everyone that sita is pure... but sita got pregnant.. the people were not gonna accept her as their queen... ( accepted her Ram's wife but not queen) so it become the right thing to leave her to become the king.... thats disrespect of feminine indeed but yet important... as at end everyone pays to the disrespect when sita gets into prithvi
Keep in mind that the people are concerned with the bloodline. They will only accept their next king if he is the son of the previous king. That is why there is no issue until the next king’s arrival is announced.
What very few people do not understand is that Sita-Rama together are the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You can't separate the two. Can you separate the sun from the sunshine? Lord Rama is Shakti-man and Mother Sita is Shakti, you can never separate them from each other. From our distorted perspective, it may appear that Lord Rama has separated from Mother Sita, but in reality it is not possible. From our perspective it may seem that the sun is born from the sea, but in reality the sun is far away and untouched by the sea. Hare Krishna! 🙏
If Sita had to do Agni Pareeksha, Ram should have joined Sita as well. Just like when they were married, when they were tied together and circled Agnideva for their everlasting love. If people questioned Sita's character, did they not question Ram's character as well. Even he was without Sita for the same amount of time, his purity could also be questioned. If we consider Ram ji as the ideal human, then how come he is falling in the trap of "Chaar log kya kahenge"? Women have been suppressed so much for so long and even now we are not questioning our beliefs bases. I have seen your other works. Thank you so much for educating the masses with our Dharma. Hopefully we all find our Paramaatman!
Rama's character is not questioned because he had already put in enormous effort in travelling across lands and in crossing the sea to find Sita and then putting his life in danger in a battle to rescue her. Do you think that a man who had a slept with another woman in his wife's absence would do that ? Is so, then you are not in reality. Secondly, it is not about an individual worrying about what "Chaar log kya kahenge". Rama was a king bearing responsibilities of the Kingdom on his shoulder and he wanted to fulfill that with the trust of the people of his kingdom that loved him dearly.
Few people say that Maa Sita was under the protection of Agni dev and Ravana had kidnapped Maya Sita. How far is this true? If yes, what is the supporting text?
@@rajeshkumar98769 but Valmiki Ramayan is more authentic and don't think there is a mention. Also if you read about Vedavati, she had cursed Ravana that a woman will be reason of his downfall. And it is said she took rebirth as Mata Sita
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
*@pikachue602* Excuse me, Miss pikachue602. Don't judge Lord Rama by listening to the ranndom commentary from the internet. Do more research about Valmiki Ramayana before getting into your conclusion... Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never listened to any lies of people. Hence Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire. And Sita's last sacrifice was also not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
Not very convinced. The truth is that Ma Sita was still pure. Shree Rama could have explained to Ma Sita, "Look. We are now public figures and much as I know you are as pure as the lotus, you have to go through the agni pariksha. This should convince the praja" For a person who has been through the traumatic experience of being abducted and separated from her beloved, does she need reassurance or condemnation? Was Shree Rama upholding dharma when he ostensibly supported an untruth and banished her into the forest?
*@satishvarma8803* I guess you are terribly misinformed about Ramayana and Lord Rama. Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never listened to any lies of people. Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire. And Sita's last sacrifice was also not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
I still strongly object to Rama's decision. The main question is not whether he loved Sita but if he was indeed a righteous king at all in this context. He knew very well that Sita was chaste, but his subjects were suspicious of her character. So, as a wise king, he should have called a public meeting and have it declared explicitly that Sita was chaste (repeating this exercise if needed), thus putting an end to the rumors. He should have also made it clear that even if Sita did sit on Ravana's thighs (or did anything that questioned her character), that would have been under coercion and thus would not qualify as a situation for judging her character. If he had pressed that conviction, he would have set a very good example of a king working as a social reformer. But alas, he "feared" speaking to his extremely loyal subjects and undertook this very anti-heroic action of exiling his wife (and eventually regretting it).
Can you explain this to todays public by talking... Suppose you are at a very high position and your wife goes through same allegations...then??? Do you think you will explain people that she is chaste and more to it will they believe?? Do you really think so ?? I don't think so... Yes it was a very harsh descision but he had no option...
@@hedwig6643 My wife's charcater is no one else's business. Only mine. Mine alone. What any one else has to say does not matter. Jashodaben may or maynot be a whore, Narendra Modi is judged only for his performance.
To anyone reading this comment and wants actual clarification on this topic, please watch Aryavart Regenerator's video titled "श्री राम ने सीता का परित्याग क्यों किया ? Devi Sita ke tyag ki katha kitni sach ?". Uttara Kaand is 102% interpolation and a disrespect to Shri Ram. Anyone believing it is actually doing adharma as well by disrespecting Shri Ram.
I think we need to change the perpective of seing thing..anything that written by our ancestors does not only have one meaning..it have internal meaning The whole ramayan was about human soul reaching back to the eternal god 1.rama-the god 2.sita-human soul 3.laksmana-awareness 4.ravanan - ego 5.14 years of exile-symbolism of when a soul and body is togather--human,the life is full of problems 6.the golden dear-maya 7.agni pravesham-when u soul(sita) is capture by ego(ravana), the soul need to get rid of the impurities and god only accept our pure soul back,agni is said to be pure in ancient The whole story of ramanyan is telling u when a soul takes a human body,it will go through hurdles ( suffering),when a human get attracted by maya(gold deer),there is where god goes out(rama went out)and ego(ravana) start to creep in..yet our awareness( lakshmana protection) will try to protect us,but still the soul will be attracted by maya...in order to let go ego and maya, a person need to undergo a big process(war) and strong faith in god(how sita have faith in rama,only think of rama)..still after the war, u soul will be testify for purity ( agni praksha) Hope this doesnt hurt anyone and just a small sharing and look at our ancestor view different...
See the movie young Victoria. In the movie while going in horse carriage with husband people comment that he husband is waste. Hearing that she goes back to palace and gives him portfolio to upkeep museums. So this happens even in modern times. I understood site being left behind only after seeing that movie.
The question not answered is, why was something as dramatic amd breath-taking as Sita's agni-pravesh not considered a valid testament of her chastity later on by the people of Ayodhya ? Ram could have simply pointed out that Sita had successfully passed the ultimate test (agni-pravesh) in Lanka itself, to which the entire Vanar and Lanka army was witness; so there remained no reason to doubt her at all. Still if some stupid people were not convinced, it was not Ram's problem. How can a king hope to satisfy everyone in any matter, let alone his personal affairs!!
exactly my point. if Rama had DECIDED ALREADY he'd abandon Sita, why make her go through agni-pariksha? moreover, by abandoning Sita, the message he is giving to his people is "to leave your wife just like i did, for FEAR OF PUBLIC OPINION. is this message RIGHT?
plus, many among Ayodhya people wud also had said words about Kaikeyi bcz she was responsible for his vanvas. DID DASHARATH ABANDON KAIKEYI ON FEAR OF PUBLIC OPINION? if public opinion is the court, NO ONE deserves to live, much less a decent life. a mob is the most unruly cruel entity.
@@ranirathi3379 Here is my answer to your question. Listen to me carefully. Lord Rama never leaved maa Sita. So even after reading the original Valmiki Ramayana if you still think that Lord Rama abandoned his wife i.e Sita and the sufferer is always a woman in all the epics, that means either you have never read any of the scriptures of Hinduism except Ramayana or probably you are ignoring the sufferings of different genders except what you want to focus on only, which has made you to think that the sufferer is always a woman in Sanatan Dharma. Nowhere in the scriptures of Ramayana it is mentioned that Lord Rama left his pregnant wife (who was a Queen of Ayodhya) alone. This is a false fake story. In the real story Lord Rama allowed his wife to visit Valmiki Ashram for her spiritual journey when she was pregnant, because she wanted her children to take birth in a spiritual place instead of a palace. So how is that leaving or betraying a wife? Have you ever read authentic Valmiki Ramayana before making up your judgment? You BETTER study our Authentic Valmiki Ramayana instead of relying on your absurd assumption to blabbber nonsense against our God's Avatar, Rama. I have studied Valmiki Ramayana by myself, and didn't find anywhere it is written that lord Rama abandoned his wife for any subject matter. If you have done more studying on Sanatan Dharma then you would know that both womén and men have to give pariksha to the God, be it agnipariksha or whatever.. How could you forgot Prahllad? He was not a woman, and yet he have given serious dangerous Agnipariksha, unlike Sita who was been giving pariksha with safety near her Avatar husband. Understand? So don't play the women card in spirituality. The God don't care about your gender, but méntality only.
I'm an honest devotee of Shri Ram. And try to follow his values in life. But I really didn't get this concept, maybe I didn't understand that. I'll not be able to answer to anyone if someone asks this to me, bcoz even I'm not 100% sure the reason for that.
Brother, Mother Sita is not a common woman, she is Lakshmi ji who came to earth with Lord Vishnu on her own will, do you think whatever happened in Ramayana did not happen as per her will? Going into exile with Shri Ram, being kidnapped by Ravana or her abandonment by Shri Ram, all these are part of the drama created by Shri Vishnu and Vishnupriya. Do not keep any kind of doubt in your mind about this because there is nothing to doubt.
@@amritansh3357 Firstly, the answer to your question has already been given in the video and secondly, why did Lord Vishnu incarnate on earth in the form of Shri Ram? Why didn't he kill Ravana directly? Why did he need to go into exile? What was the need for them to allow Sita to be kidnapped? Why didn't he kill Ravana at the time of abducting Sita? There is no answer to these questions, that is why I had earlier explained to you that this entire Ramayana from the beginning till the end is a leela created by Lord Vishnu and Lakshmi ji. If you are an atheist then it doesn't matter but if you are a theist and you believe in God then why do you doubt here?
I don't think uttar kanda was originally part of Valmiki Ramayana. It was added later even Gita press publication mentions this as disputed among scholars . Which means Valmiki Ramayana ends with Lanka kand .
