Will I Switch? Canon vs. Nikon for Astrophotography 

I really thought at the end you would have made an announcement where Nikon decided to make a camera just for you called the Nicon.

Thanks Nico! As a long time visual astronomer and former engineer with a half dozen telescopes, I went with a D5500 to begin my dive into AP along with an ASI1220mc. This was a good comparison and spotlights the clip in filter issue. The specs of the Sony sensor drove my choice in a camera I'll self mod and cool as part of the hands on tinkering aspects to be had. Your processing tutorials are a fantastic resource. Thank you!

I can listen to you and your content for hours. I am so new to astrophotography literally started last spring so much to learn it can be overwhelming but with your help from videos I made some significant progress. Thank you for that Nico.

Excellent review! Always good to get away from the numbers sometimes and look at real world results!

Thanks this helps me better understand what to look for in my next camera. I currently use a Nikon D 7200 and that looks like another strong option instead of the 5300. I am considering a Z6ii and that looks pretty good as well. I will check out Night Sky Camera

I have started using Fuji XA5, a budget mirrorless camera, and it's read noise is even lower than Nikon at ISO 200. Basically it's an iso invariant model. I haven't even modded it and it's Ha response is comparable to a modded canon. May be you can add this camera to the comparison in the future? In your comparison, the Nikon clearly looks the winner. I just hope the optolongs and the astronomics start building filters for Nikon

Very interesting, and commendable impartiality. It occurs to me though, that if the level of scrutiny is at this level, then a dedicated astroimaging camera, such as QHY, ZWO and Atik, rather than a modded general purpose DSLR, is the way to go.

The 60D is not Canon's latest and greatest. If you try a Canon 80D or later (including the 200D and 800D, if I recall right, at bargain prices), with a newer generation of Canon sensor, you'll find the noise level of Canon is much closer to Nikon. I switched from Canon 60DA to a modified D5500 a few years ago, but if I were doing it now I would probably simply get a newer Canon. Thanks for publishing your test!

Thanks for a great side by side comparison. I am looking into getting a second Nikon body to remove the ir filter on. The read noise chart will be helpful to helpful when comparing my current camera with a potential purchase.

I've been going nuts for about 10 days trying to figure out why I get this horrible bands when shooting Andromeda and the Pleiades with my Canon T6i (750D) at ISO 100 and doing 2 min exposures and you just explained it perfectly. I guess I'll be doing 15 sec exposures at ISO 800 from now on... I was very puzzled by this because i've been using the same camera for 3 years and i've never seen the banding, but on the other hand, I wasn't shooting at ISO 100 either. I knew the low ISO setting had something to do. I was trying to compensate with very agressive dithering and gathering a lot of data.

Ya makes sense. I am a Nikon user and for clip in filter I have 3d printed some adaptors that take 1.25in round filters (all types) and they work perfectly. Great comparison sir. Loved the content.

I just started astrophotography with a Nikon d5600.

Pentax is very good for landscape astrophotography, it has Astrotracer function and it's super useful function, you can capture images without any classic startrecker, without alignment on polar star. You just calibrate it, by simple movement of camera around it axis and you are free to go. 2 min need to start shooting a tracked images. Also very cool that you can move with camera where you want and no need to make again calibration. With classic startrecker you need make polar alignment if you moved camera from its initial place or if you exidently moved/hit your tripod. There is also benefit in weight, Astrotracer in some cameras are build in and in some it's an extension module, maybe 40 grams... Not few kg... Cons of Pentax Astrotracer then you can't make so long exposures with Tele lenses as with classic tracker... But still around 20-30 sec at Tele lense is possible and then just stack them.

Another great video, Nico...great comparison! I'm just waiting 'til I can afford a better star tracker, so I can put my 5D Mark II & assortment of EF lenses to better astro-use! The Move Shoot Move is a great cheap little tracker, but really only good for super wide angle Milky Way-type shots. Seems to be too much periodic error for much deep sky.

I've been looking up Nikon's for Astrophotography also Nico, this is a well timed video for me! Thanks

Hello Nico and thanks for this comparison. I should be happy about the results, as I have a nikon d5600, but actually you are right about the lack of clip filters for nikon DSLRs. If you arent' in the mood (and I'm not) to spend more money for a clip filter than the money you spent to buy the camera itself, the only alternate solution is to buy LARGE round filters which could be adapted on all (or most of) you lenses by using step-down rings. But I'd mention another issue I have with Nikon DSLRs: vintage lenses. The second hand market is full of "vintage" lenses which could be pretty good for astrophotography (they surely can do much better than the stock zooms like 18-55 or 55-200) and cheap enough to be considered as an alternate choice if you have low budgets. T2 or M42 adapters allow you to mount them on almost all cameras, but here comes the trouble with Nikon dslrs, as they loose the infinite focus. Unless you use a specific adapter, having an additional lens in the middle, which brings back the infinte focus, but it also causes a loss of quality. Or unless you unscrew the lens itself and "hack" it, which is beyond the skill of 99% of amatorial photographers, I bet... As far as I understood this is a trouble affecting Nikon DSLRs only. Canon cameras (both mirrorless and dslr), and Nikon mirrorless cameras should not be affected and shouldn't need any additional lens to get the infinite focus back. Probably this is another aspect to be considered when deciding between Nikon and Canon DSLRs, above all if you have a low budget and vintage lenses could help a lot in containing the expenses :)

Another top-notch video. Very informative and helpful. Well done!

How do you always come up with an amazing video, I'm surprised you didn't reach a million subs yet!

Hi Nico, thank you very much for your very informative video. As a Nikon user, I acknowledge the qualities of the astro modified Canon cameras, but a change would be a heavy cross. But I continue to inform myself and remain open to everything. Cheers

After many years of chopping and changing I settled on Fuji because of their good Ha response and low noise. The analogue dials are cool too!

Thank you Nico for this comparison. It's interesting to see that, noise aside, it seems that the Nikon defines better in some occurences. At 13.50 it shows, if one looks at the horse head on the right (I believe it's what it is...), that it seems more defined wiith the Nikon, whereas more hesitant with the Canon. Also, the Nikon seems to always have a better, more clear cut contrast. At the same time stars look more "blobby" with the Nikon. I would also think that the clip-on filters selection is a big plus for the Canon. Best...

I love Nico’s channel and his ap skills 🙌🏼

I’m using an unmodified Canon 70D for astrophotography and like you I never shoot below 1600 ISO. I’m guessing that the dithering is mostly taking care of the horizontal banding. Great summary Nico.

Hi Nico, your presentation style is so easy to watch, I really enjoy your work. Ive been seriously into photography for a few years now, but have just become interested in astrophotography. Your content has certainly contributed to my new found interest. i'd like to use my existing gear, but am also considering buying a Fornax lightrack 2 mount. Can you advise the best combination of my current gear for setting up 2 cameras, one for wide Milky Way Landscapes and one for tighter compositions. I have the following Canon gear. Eos R5, Eos 5DS R, 1DX Mk2. Lenses Canon 300mm f2.8, Canon 500mm f4 IS, Canon 24-70 f2.8 Mk2, Canon RF 800mm F11 and RF 2x converter, Sigma 14mm 1.8 Art. So far i've only taken single exposures at up to 30 seconds, and im not keen on spending time stacking images, only some touching up in Lightroom if poss. Do you think I could make satisfactory images with a tracker but no stacking? Cheers, David

Excellent comparison Nico. I have previously owned and used for astrophotography (all unmodded) Canon 6D, 5D MK III & 5D MK IV and everyone of them has exhibited terrible banding issues. Last year I purchased a secondhand Sigma Fp and it literally blows all the Canons out of the water in Astrophotography. It has a superb sensor. I personally feel the Canons have marketing hype rather than real world quality backing them. If want to experience just how far behind Canon is behind others in sensor technology have a look at the Nikon D810 unmodded for Astro work. It is simply amazing. The only reason I didn't go for the Nikon is the fact that I have a heavy investment in Canon Lenses. Thank you for proving what I have personally experienced in this arena.

I can't speak for the Canon Mirrorless....but I switched to Nikon from shooting Canon for 2 decades. Primarily for the lack of an AA filter, but also the VASTLY better ISO performance. The Z6 in particular is truly astounding. Good luck with your decision. It was not an easy or cheap endeavor...but it was very much a benefit for me.

I would really love to take lot and lot of pictures of the vast outer space in a future as you do, but I don't understand a damn thing about what you talk about in your videos and also that I'm still learning English xD but I hope to have that passion in a future. I love your content and the time you have dedicated to it dude

I think another important spec is the quantum efficiency of the sensor. Astro Photography Tool site says QE for 60d is 40% and for d5300 it is 54%. Not sure if this is correct, and also different camera mods can alter this spec differently, but a significant theoretical 1.35x advantage of a Nikon camera. Would also be interesting to compare d5300 with the newer 80d camera (or any other with the same sensor).

Great comparison, Nico. I've always wondered about the difference between the two brands. I see quite often that Nikon users seem to prefer their cameras for focusing on stars. I don't have any experience at all with Nikon (since I just barely have experience with my Canon DSLR!), but is there a higher zoom on Nikon when using live view, or is there some other advantage when trying to focus on stars?

Just found your channel and I find it very helpful. I'm completely new to astrophotography. I did a lot of photography back in the day of the darkroom and smelly chemistry. Actually, I like the smell of the chemicals and will probably still do some but I suppose it's time to get with the 21st century. I would like to see more videos like this. Perhaps more on choosing and using software too. Anyway, thank you.

What stood out most to me was the number of stars and the dynamic range of the Nikon. However, like you pointed out, the mods weren't the same.

thank you for sharing and excellent display. Happy New Year.

If I had to do this choise, I would choose to get a mirrorless camera that has a good input noise performance and adapt the telescope as you normally would to Canon cameras but adding an adapter from canon EF to whatever mount you are using

Apart from the difference in the modification of the two cameras, which for the full-spectrum mod seems to give the Nikon richer colors, the 60D is older technology (2010) versus the D5300 (2014). And both are old relative to current CMOS technology which has been improving rapidly. The comparison is a great idea that hopefully can be updated to more contemporary tech down the road. I have wondered whether any of the Nikon or Sony cameras are employing the Exmor R tech that eliminates amp glow as found in the dedicated astro cameras like the ZWO ASI533MC pro.

I started on a Sony a5100 2 years ago and upgraded to an a6600. I will go full-frame when I can afford it, but I enjoy the extra each with the APSC.

Looking forward to see a comparison with Fuji, my very first Orion Nebula shot was with an 800mm telescope and a Fujifilm X-T20, hoping to reshoot that photo with the X-T4

Holly shh you just got that video in time thanks keep up the good vids

It's fun to try other gear, but when you have a lot invested in a brand, unless making piles of money, I would'nt change. Great video.

Very helpful comparison, thanks.

waiting for fujifilm comparison to canon and nikon. i was canon person long time ago, but amount of lenses for fuji were higher at that time. for mirrorless cameras at least. so switched from canon to fujifilm. kinda sorta want to know "was it a good idea or not". thank you for what's you're doing, Nico!

Canon's 18Mpix sensor used in 60D, 7D and some of their other cameras of that time was one of the worst they engineered. Sensors used by Nikon usually tend to perform better in terms of noise and tonal dynamic. I still like Canon ergonomics more.

Nikon still designs their sensors in house same as Canon, but they contract out the actual production of them to Sony and Toshiba, Another one you may want to try is the Pentax K1 mk1, it uses a modified version of the Nikon D810s sensor and seems to have more Ha sensitivity than is normal for a DSLR, not to mention its astrotracer function.

I would be interested in seeing a comparison of Pentax, Canon and Nikon cameras. I have been using Pentax for years and the comparisons you made in this video are similar to what I get with a stock Pentax K-3 using long exposure atlow ISO settings. I'm not really sure why Pentax is not well supported in the astrophotography world. Their cameras are well made and they have a great selection of features with each camera. But, maybe thats going to be one of lifes great mysteries. (One thing I have come to realize is; they do not work with many of the popular software versions specific to astrophotography. That alone makes them no a top choice.) Thank you for the very informative comparisons and the great content of your videos. You have helped me with several of the Astro decisions that I have had to make. Also, thanks for pointing out some of the great companies that specialize in astro modding dslr cameras. I look forward to more great videos.... Cheers

Nico the most obvious difference is dynamic range between these two sensors. The Nikon has deeper blacks than the Canon sensor. The fact that the blacks are deeper is testimony that the Nikon sensor has lower noise than Canon's. Thanks for taking the time to illustrate these differences. It was worth it.

I have a Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D that my dad gave me along with a 70-300mm lens and I'm excited to try it out. Wish it had live view, but I can live without it.

I can confirm, that the rave about which camera brand's sensors are better is very tribal. After doing photography and especially astrophotography for several years I have come to the point that bothering about the sensor performance is only worth it if the difference is at least one stop. So the step from apcs to full frame (if you have the optics for it) which is roughly 1 stop difference in noise is worth it. But I won't even start comparing uncooled cameras of the same sensor size to each other. But nice to see that these sensors despite their size difference (canon apsc is smaller than every other manufacturer's apsc) and one being more isoless than the other perform so similar.

I would love to see you do a review of Pentax's astrotracer function. I love my k-70 and have been really contemplating it!

The different mods made a difference. The Nikon full spectrum looked better in all cases. I'd like to see the 60D with the full spectrum i.e. apples to apples. Great video man. I'm motivated to buy a local 6D for $400 with less than 4k shutter count.

Dang! I am brand new to astrophotography. Have been trying to do all my research before buying the equipment. This video alone convinved me to go with Nikon. From my point of view every single photo comparison was of higher quality than the Canon. The darker colors really stood out for me and when you zoomed in I could tell quite easily that the noise was FAR less with the Nikon.

Thanks. Comparing newer/pricier Canon and Nikon APS-C models, looks like read noise in Canon sensors have nearly caught up to Nikon's (Canon 90D vs Nikon D7500) at ISO 1600. Although at ISO 400, Canon 90D is no better than the much older Nikon D5300. I have have a 70D, SL3 and lots of Canon glass and accessories. Thinking about a Canon 90D and your video convinced me I won't be missing out.

The main reason is that the Canon crop sensor is slightly smaller than Nikon's DX crop sensor. Which is also why Canon 60D has a slightly higher crop factor compared to the Nikon D5300. It just comes down to physics. For the same number of photosites, they will be more closely packed on the Canon sensor than on the Nikon sensor, leading to more random electron excitation and heat registering as noise.

Very cool! Make a video about Fujifilm cameras. It would be interesting to see.

You may want to check the Fuji XT100, I heard it was quite good with the amount of noise it produces (and it’s not expensive).

I have the STC optics Duo Narrowband and Multi Spectra clip in filters for Nikon APS-C. They work very well. I think Trevor has a review on the Duo Narrowband filter for Canon APS-C. I shoot Nikon. I learned on a Nikkormat FT2 when I was a kid. That's the only camera brand I knew about. Now I'm a jelly belly that would love to shoot with Canon or Sony. Maybe in the next life.

As a Nikon D5300 user i always wondered what the Canons are really up to in comparison. THX for this Video! Some of my Astrophoto friends use Canon and always wonder how my pictures are like that with ISO 800 :) Guess i´ll try lower ISO´s next time

With a lifelong passion for photography and due for an upgrade, I found this video very informative. I was pretty much set on Canon (and still may be) but with using the camera for other things besides astro, I was stopped dead in my tracks. Tony & Chelsea Northrup just came out with a video highlighting Canon's announcement that the DSLR is discontinued. Nikon will follow suit. Both manufacturers are putting all of their development into their mirror-less lines. I narrowed down my selection to a Canon 90D but will start over again looking at mirror-less cameras. One of the biggest deciding factors will be in camera filters and what brands they are most available for. I'm guessing it will be Canon, but the minute advantages the Sony sensor has could sway me.

I’ve loved my D780 for Astro stuff. Not too familiar with Canon but personally I’ve grown a lot using my Nikon.

Great video Nico! So which ISO do you use when shooting with the Ra? Judging by photonstophotos charts the optimal one is 4000?

nice comparison, i still struggle to decide if i should go for a d5300 or a canon 2000d or 600d One thing i wonder, how well does the nikon connect to N.I.N.A Edit: After reading about that "green star" problem with Nikon cameras, i will buy a Canon camera. The 2000D is huge improvement over the 600D, in terms of colour noise and banding.

Interesting. Wonder what you think of Fuji cameras. They can extend exposure times beyond 30s without going into bulb-mode using T mode and have built-in intervalometer (at least mine do ;) ) and their sensors are highly regarded for APS-C.

I got a Canon 60D (full spec), Nikon D5300 (same full spec) and also used a Canon T7 (unmodded) recently although I only borrowed it. Guess which one I liked better? My Pentax K70. 😂 Absolutely no astro support gadgets like filter , not even wired tethering, but I just love the images it makes with my wireless intervalometer. I think you should also try Olympus cameras, they do have some dedicated astro mode, like even star-focusing.

IMO whwn comparing the two images @10.00 the Canon on the left looks visually better. Stars appear slightly tighter and less spread out. When zoomed in the Nikon has better detail on all images because its full spectrum.

You mention the Nikon intervalometer doesn't deal with bulb mode, but another crippling feature on Nikon is that it will stop shooting if you get exposure time that exceeds the interval time. Even on a D6. Otherwise an awesome camera, but that renders the internal internal intervalometer unusable for many uses.

Gosh, I wish I could post a photo to illustrate my point. Check out the two photos at the 8:40 mark of this video. Compare the asterism located at the 10:30 position about halfway between the center and the extreme upper left corner. Looks to be a variable star very dim in the Canon exposure compared to a maximum in the Nikon exposure.

I fixed the Nikon clip in issue with my adapters. Now all 1.25 filters can be used.

Dude ... You got some guts 😂 I know so many die hards who either pick one camp and fly it's flag to death :))) Very eloquent comparison! Somehow I feel the 4 min subs stacked at iso 400 would carry the read noises and will become problematic when stretching to get the finer details in team canon ... Just a hunch ... If anything you video made my mind up to modify my 2000d to full spectrum :) There was quite a huge difference in detail when picking up fainter stars... I wander how hard can it be to perform the mod myself? ... Got to go googling ;)

I am still using my Nikon lenses from when I was in high school, in the 1980's.

You should've compared the Canon to the D5600. Quite a significant leap forward from the D5300; even less noise. The Nikon D5600 is still a highly sought after astro camera for beginners.

Have you tried the 50+mp Canon 5Dsr? I use one of those for architecture because it doesn't have an anti-aliasing filter and high MP count, but have been curious to know how it might work for night sky.

You missed out on Pentax. Especially the later K1, K3II etc models. With built in astrotracker and a huge range of economy legacy lenses. Works well for me. And no nasty bands like I often see with Canon.

For a 2009 sensor (The 18 megapixel that was used in the 7D, 60D, T3i, T4i, T5i, Eos M, Eos SL1) vs a 2013 sensor (Nikon D5300), considering the huge developments in sensors, I'd say the Canon fought really well.

Thanks for the shoot out! It's good to see that while there is differences between the two, they don't appear to be earth shattering. That being said, if you were just starting, and didnt have the previous investment in shooting routine and accessories, would the lower read noise draw you to Nikon, or is the filter situation enough to keep you with Cannon?

Very interesting Nico, thanks for making the effort! Out of interest have you ever tried the Magic Lantern firmware add on - I use it on my venerable modded 6D to give me an in camera intervalometer

Nikon looks like it has less noise and higher contrast. Nikon seems to have the better sensor, while Canon has better accessory support like clip-in filters. It's a tough call, unless you use a telescope to image and can use 1.25"/2" filters that aren't camera body specific.

But what about Pentax? Those sensor have a risicolous low read noise, and since the K-3 the have a kind-of tracker which makes use of the GPS, compas and sensor shift technology. For older models.like K-5 / K-7 there's a hotshoe mountable item that does the same.

If I'm reading the graphs right, it looks like the best performer might be the Nikon D7200. It has a similar profile to the Phase One medium format digital back, which costs more than 10 times more. It outperforms any of their full-frame cameras or professional cameras. The semi-pro D500 is right in there with the D7200 too. Fortunately, so is my wish-list camera, the Fuji GFX50S-II.

If you want to do any computer control for fuji your best bet is to get an x-t2, xt-3, or x-t4, and use indi based software (I like kstars/ekos). The x-t1 has issues shooting over 30s and it was difficult to get it to work. Any other model camera doesn't really support tethering. It's a shame they aren't better supported as the increased h-alpha response was a big driver for me to switch to fuji, but its just too difficult to get it to work in any sort of automated workflow. the x-t2 and newer should be better though, as they support 2, 4, 8, 15 min exposures.

would a canon 6d Mark 2 be a good camera to get modified with a full spectrum for deep sky astrophotography?

How much light does an IR filter kill? I figured the anti-aliasing filter is worth a little less than half a stop in my D4s.

I feel like I'm missing something. If a lower input-referred read noise by ISO is lower, isn't that very desirable for shooting nebulas? It seems like the Nikon would be preferred for this kind of photography. Also, great content! Just found your channel and it is very informative.

If I remember right Canon APS-C cameras use a smaller sensor than other brands. Is that still the case?

Well,that's a nice comparison between brand, but full spec will collect more light which means it will has less noise, so using a same mod should be more fair(I think), but overall it's not a big deal, cuz the main problem with Canon is banding.

Does a 60D not have an internal intervalometer? My Canon 7Dmkii has one and i thought it was standard on all canons but maybe its only after a certain year

guessing dslr sensor are better than milc for astrophotography, since most dslr has no on sensor AF focusing which might cause noise or banding like milc? Plus older dslr are cheaper and you can use the money to mod the sensor filter.

An old video but good one, question for help, I have a canon 450D, based on the photostophtons would it be better to shoot at iso 400 or 800, read noise at 400 is double that at 800. My exposure time at the moment is 120-180 secs.

Neither get a cooled Astro cam and use the lenses on that with correct adapter

I bought a Nikon D90 for my wife like 10 or 12 years ago. She barely used it. Now that I’ve decided to get into this hobby, I dusted it off and am currently just reading up and watching these videos before I start. By the time I am able to start, it will be hurricane season here in Florida. 😂

Great video !!! you should get your hands on the D7200 cause it has a MUCH much better sensor than the D3xxx series! It will be night and day ! Even the D5xxx series is a big upgrade from the D3xxx series ;)

Nice comparison. Several years ago (back when I was using a Canon 30D and a workmate used a Nikon D50 for astrophotography), there was some argument that Nikon always applies a software filter even on RAW images, while Canon really delivers the raw sensor data unprocessed. Is this still the case? If yes, it could explain the lower noise level to some avail on top of the different sensor being used.

Mucha gracias por este didáctico Video!

Any comments on using a Nikon D40 DSLR to do astrophotography

Nikon D5300 is my first proper DSLR. I also have been given Canon 5D miii, full size sensor, so here is my bit to comparison. Usability:Live view zoom - Nikon D5300 wins big on this. It can zoom much further so I really can nail that manual focus D5300 wins big on this one. It also has no problem to focus on bright stars in autofocus mode using 35mmF/1.8 lenses I use for wide field. The intevalometer means I can make timelapses without extra equipment. The menu in D5300 is just sooooo much better. It has extra part that remembers last I think 15 settings you have changed recently so it has no problem to find what you have changed to change it back. When you use fn button everything is so fast to change. With 5D Miii I struggle to make it read the exposure value from single focus point when I want to focus on something and half way change the composition for daylight photography. The manu there is just awful. However of course I cannot deny the quality of 5D sensor, but here is where ISO invariance kicks again. On other side, Canon has got problem with stuck and dead pixels, much bigger than Nikon.

I have the Canon 60Da, and the Canon EOS Ra. The Ra is said to have a invariant sensor. I get good data from it with my Williams Optics Redcat a my Star Watcher Star Adventurer. I also use Fujifilm cameras which because of the X-Trans sensor have a higher sensitivity to Ha. Try the Canon EOS Ra vs the Nikon D810a.

Once you delve into sony bsi its really hard to go back.

The 6d is probably the cleanest full frame large pixel dslr sensor ever. Usb connection.

This was a great video

The Canon R5 starting to ISO invariant starting at ISO 400

Hi Nico. Do we know why there are limited filter choices for nikon cameras and is there a chance this may improve in the future? I have a D5300 and D750 and shoot mostly from a bortle 6 light polluted area, lens based only.

Loved The Comparison Nico....I have been tempted also....But after your Video I think Ill stay put....I have a Lot of Canon Products, DSLRs, Point and Shoots..Etc......But, My First Digital Camera was a Nikon Coolpix 990, and I loved It ( Still Have it...LOL)....Then, I bought a Canon 300D and the Rest was history, Been pretty Much Team Canon ever Since.....Nikon is Tempting, as is Sony's Alpha line......They all have there strengths and weaknesses.....Canon I have always found to be far more pliable for a DSLR and far more accessories to choose from....Lots of Choice with Canon and very competitive in pricing.... Some other Tubers like Alyn Wallace, Stan Moniz use Sony, but do Widefield and Landscape Astro....Works well for them....One thing I took from The Sony Crowd that translates---Stan backs a Hoya StarScape Filter That I have bought and Come to Adore for my unmodded T6 and 450D. Highly Recommend....But, Most of who Is who in this hobby though seem to lean toward Canon.....We just do.....Canon also seems to be keen to cater too us also.... If I were going to Leap toward another Brand, I am Smitten with Pentax....That New K1 is Impressive.....

Thank you so much Nico! I read the title of the video and thought: Traitor! Like a football fan. Hahahahah Cheers from Brazil.