Will Our Bodies Adapt To Mars? | Neil deGrasse Tyson 

We evolved to do that

@@InstrumentalsBeats possible but evolution has a benefit driver, where this could be an adaptation of an evolution to another purpose.

​@InstrumentalsBeats Yes, we evolved to, among other things, be able to adapt better... That doesn't mean that life doesn't adapt. Tho relying too much on lifes ability to adapt to any arbitrary environment is also clearly dangerous, so I can kind of understand the motivation here.

When you move through time, your body grows. I mean, I don't know you but I assume you're at least now taller than you were at 5years.. did you 'Adapt' along the way or its just something your body is predisposed to do? A genetic code

Because we can survive before adapting to that..

Unless you nit pick over fringe cases like a primordial RNA world, artificial machine life, or panpsychism then it seems safe to say that all adaptation involves a genetic component. I'm not sure why you seem to imply that this genetic component makes the adaptation less "true," nor why you want to delineate or quantify it in isolation. Development and behavior of biological organisms is often described as being influenced by both "Nature" and "Nurture" where Nature tends to refer to the genetics and initial conditions associated with an organism and Nurture to the influences of the environment of that organism. Hard determinism is the position that these factors entirely determine the behaviors of life, and that there exists no degree of freedom or will that life can exert. I disagree with this philosophy because a) quantum mechanics can not prove that wave function collapses are random; it is assumed axiomatically due to them always appearing indistinguishable from randomness. That said, there is a lot of non-random observable data that also appears indistinguishable from randomness. Data and communication encryption is one of them. If a government agency picked up a data transfer between two persons of interest that appeared to be random, it would not be rational for them to assume that it was random noise. They could reasonably decide to err on the side of caution, and consider the possibility that the data contained some significant communication. All of this is simply to say that free will is possible, and it doesn't seem completely unreasonable to think that without it we could be entirely replaceable and replaced by AI systems since they would be able to take anything they want from us by force. The no cloning theorem of Quantum mechanics would change this dynamic if our choices and/or behavior relied significantly on wave function collapses contained within the CNS, its interface with our bodies and microbiome.

You don’t understand the theory of evolution. What you just said, proves it.