Join me on my landscape photography journey as I photograph and vlog across Scotland, you may pick up some tips along the way. Expect to find lots of landscape photography vlogs, landscape images, wildlife photography and maybe videos covering other photography topics too.
great review thank you, im reading up as im using this lens this weekend so wanted to get first hand reviews, your one is the best one i have seen, great photos and videos also so thank you
Hi Wayne. Very interesting video. I've just sent off my xt5 and lenses for trade in after buying a very discounted z7ii and 24-120mm. I've definitely been bitten by the nikon bug but I'm wondering if I should stick to the z7ii and get a zf to use alongside (and scratch the retro itch) with its excellent low light capabilities or just go all in on a z8. I also do landscape and wildlife. My first lens will be the 180-600 followed by the 14-30 f4. Thanks again.
Hi Craig, thanks for watching. The Z 24-120mm is a great lens and the Z7 II is a great camera for landscapes. I don't have a lot of experience with the Z7 II for wildlife but I suspect it's absolutely fine for static/slower moving wildlife and generally wildlife which is "easier" to photograph. A Z8 would clearly have better AF for wildlife but it really depends on your needs. I can't comment on the ZF as I haven't used one. Good luck.
The testing was done using an XT-3. I would think that results should be similar using XH-1. I was looking specifically for a video showcasing the 150-600mm with the XT-3 or XH-1, and I highly recommend that you should put the camera used in the video description. After having viewed this video, I am extremely interested in this lens as a future purchase, for use with my XH-1. Thank You for producing such a good and informative video presentation.
I’m trying to do macro photography. I have a nikon z5, with a nikkor 24-200 zoom lens. My shutter release doesn’t work past 70mm zoom. Why can’t I do macro at full zoom?
I'm sorry that you went through this, but since you have decided to leave Fuji, you should have talked about the problems specifically because others might be having them and potential customers can know what to look out for. Sometimes, you should use your platform to make a change in the way a business does business and let Fuji know that you aren't happy through a video, by getting tons of views from it and letting Fuji know, can but not always make a change. You did the right thing at first, going to Fuji before discussing it. You have given them the opportunity, and if enough people see this and are having issues, they will lobby Fuji for a change. Businesses have customers and angry customers going viral, causes changes. I wish you well with your next camera purchase and I hope that you don't have problems. Good luck.
I am sorry to hear that you have had problems with your camera repairs. Fortunately I haven't had any problems with my Fujifilm equipment, but even so I understand your frustration with your experiences. Hopefully, you will have better experiences with your new camera system.
Since more than three years I am trying to make good bird photos with my X-T3 and my 100-400mm, but unfortunately I don't succeed. I tried everything: fast shutter speed, low ISO, stepping down the aperture, having a stable position. But the majority of my photos have bad image quality. Very mushy, not sharp and crisp at all. Is it 'dirty' air, is it the bad autofocus of the X-T3, is it too much zooming in, or - that is my question - is my 100-400 a bad sample? I really tend to this explanation. (I had another sample of the this lens and it was the same). I hope you can tell me: No, you just have to do this and that and then everything will be fine.
I'm afraid I can't provide a simple answer which will fix your issues. The X-T3 is not nearly as capable as other cameras for birds in flight. However it can take good photos in that situation and it is capable for stationary birds. The 100-400mm lens that I had was suitable for the aforementioned situations. I would take some simple test shots at home (not of wildlife) to verify if your lens is performing as you'd expect. If you are not getting good quality photos in a simple situation like that then I'd try contacting Fuji for help.
I didn’t have a 102MP GFX so I can’t compare to that camera. I imagine 99% of photographers would be happy with the Z8 and some quality lenses is the best thought that I can offer.
Hi, The low res. Viewfinder and screen are enough to show taken photograph? The image quality is good enough at 14bit 45.7mp for large print to see details? I owned Sony a1 but didn’t like colours, and my GFX100S is not versatile specially with bulky lenses. I love image quality by my Gfx at 16bit and 102mp but unfortunately it’s good for studio and landscape only and not for all types of photography! The only thing that I’m afraid if I switch to Z8 is image quality since I’m pixel peeping person. Please let me know your opinion. Thank you
I hope this video will be a reason for a big review of the Fuji's customer support at your location... that's insane. Hope your transition will bring you good (and new, which is also important) experience.
I just got mine in a couple weeks ago and it just seems so.... soft. That's even at a shutter speed of 2,000. Do bad copies of these go around, should I exchange it or is it my technique somehow? I have no idea how you shot a shutter speed of 160 at 600mm!
In theory there could be bad copies of any lens, this lens should definitely be sharp. I’d do some careful tests by taking pictures of something stationary using a tripod. That should produce sharp images so will help you determine the issue.
@@WayneRobertsonPhotography maybe I’m expecting too much from this lens? Do I need to be pretty close to these birds for really sharp photographs of them?
@jimk8353 the larger the subject is in your frame the more detail you will see however if conditions are suitable a scene or subject can be far away and still be sharp. I personally try to maintain some reasonable distance from wildlife to avoid bothering what I’m photographing. If any other lenses you may have are fine then you may want to get this one checked.
I've been a Fujifilm shooter for over a decade, Nikon before that. If I were ever to leave Fuji, this would be why. Their service doesn't hold a candle to NPS. You'd have had a loaner in 2 days from Nikon while waiting on your repair.
I’ve had this lens about the same amount of time and was using it on a X-T3 to start with. However a few months ago I bought the X-H2S and with the 150-600 it’s just a perfect partnership. If you haven’t got one yet then I can recommend buying one. Great video and thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I also recently purchased the Nikon Z8 to basically upgrade from my Nikon D3S. I already have the F2.8 24-70 and F2.8 70-200 lenses and the 2X teleconverter, which gives me a range from 24-400mm. In order to use these two lenses, I purchased the F - Z adapter and have had great results so far. The 2X added to the 70-200 retains excellent sharpness. However, I have decided to expand and ordered the 180-600mm lens and the 1.4X adapter to push it out to 840mm. The adapter came today, but the 180-600mm lens is on back order with B&H Camera. So, I simply hope that the order gets filled soon! Hoping to have a fun summer with great photos of wildlife.
That sounds like a nice collection of lenses. I hope you get the Z 180-600mm soon, it seems like many people love that lens and it should be great for wildlife. Good luck this summer!
Was there any reason you didn't stick with the 24-200? I'm looking at getting one and although it might be a slight soft in the corners at some focal lengths I think that's something I can live with. I think it would be nice if Nikon released a 70-300 as a lighter option to the 100-400, I know Tamron has one but the field curvature issues and lack of VR would be a deal breaker for me.
Hi, that's a good question. The 24-200mm lens is a fantastic versatile lens and it offers great value. I could definitely take great images with it and make great prints. I personally felt the lenses I discuss in this video are better for my needs and I accepted I would carry both or one of them depending on my needs, how far I have to hike etc. etc. I did also notice the softness at certain focal lengths in the 24-200mm that you mentioned so while not deal breaking I do get better results with the S lenses. It's very much a personal thing depending on your requirements; people will have different opinions and preferences.
@@WayneRobertsonPhotography Yeah definitely personal preferences although the S lenses are a bit better. I use the mid to mild telephoto range a lot which means I switch lenses a lot with my current setup which is annoying or impossible if the weather is bad. I also usually crop to 4:5, 4:3 or 19:9 so any corner softness is less of an issue.
Hello Wayne. Am I glad I found you on RU-vid. Was priced up and ready to spend on fujifilm gear but no longer due to your poor customer service. Have to sus out nikon now. Love your style of videos. Now researching which nikon mirrorless camera to get.
Hi Phil, thanks for watching my videos! That was my honest experience with Fujifilm but of course others may have had a much better experience. I'm glad to hear you enjoy my videos and good luck with whatever camera you decide to go for 👍🏼
ive been looking at this lens to upgrade from the adapted Nikkor 500mm Reflex lens ive been using. it has a fixed f8 aperture so l being able to stop down would be a huge boon
I have been torn on switching from Fuji to Nikon … I didn’t realize you switched from Fuji and you almost had me sold on the Fuji xh2s … weirdly I’ve been torn between that and the z8…. I photograph a lot of barrel racing and need reliable autofocus. Do you find the z8 autofocus is more reliable?
Thanks for watching some of my videos. I understand that you’ll know why I switched to Nikon. I personally find the Z8 autofocus to be better but that’s not to say that the XH2S is bad. There is a lot to consider when changing cameras and lenses but I’m very happy with my Z8.
Thank you for the sample images and video. I'm pretty much sold on picking up this lens for my X-H2S. I tend to try and include more of the environment in a pleasing way( I find it way more fun than just blowing out the background). The F8 aperture is actually perfect for video and Flog2's 1250 native ISO.
Thank you for your videos! As a Fuji photographer myself I have been looking to upgrade from the Fuji XT3 and you helped me make my decision for a an upgrade :)
Great choice, I made the same switch from fuji to z8 in September. Only a couple of nonths later and I got the 180-600 and 800 PF, both absolutely brilliant and relatively affordable, for what they offer. I'm sure you'll enjoy the new gear, I sure haven't been disappointed. 😁
Thanks very much. Glad to hear you are enjoying those two lenses; they would be a great combination for wildlife. I’m really enjoying using the gear that I’ve bought 😊
Glad you're enjoying your new camera system. I enjoyed your previous videos and so thank you for that. You had your reasons for moving to Nikon, camera owners can be too tribal over gear so never mind the silly comments.
Thanks very much John it’s always nice to hear someone has enjoyed a video! Yes I sold the GFX and am doing all my photography on the Z8 which I’m really happy with.
I own the Z8 and 100-400mm with the 1.4 TC and I can’t tell the difference in image quality with the TC but I haven’t had it a long time. I like it. My next purchase is something in the 24-70 range…liked your perspective. Thanks.
