The camera position does effect the way you feel when flying a drone on my bottom mount racing frames the camera is very high and you feel like your riding on top of your drone whereas the freestyle frames like the reverb you feel like your down inside the drone.
I have no doubts that we can feel the difference, but our feelings can be misleading. That's why for science it's not enough to say: I can feel :) not enough to even say: I can 100% feel :)
Great video Ivan. Is there a way to hook up a potenciometer to the fc and read its value as throttle input? So we could hook up a standard radio via sbus port?
Drama between Mr. Steele and Rosser, since I own both Apex and AOS, I agree that when we fly drones freely without fear, Mr. Steele's opinion becomes valid and relatable. A drone used for fun, crashing here and there, hitting walls, concrete, or falling into water, indeed should be very durable and easy to maintain. On the other hand, for example with my AOS 7 frame, it's also true that we need a drone that is truly smooth >99% to capture many beautiful places and experience a super relaxing and enjoyable flight. So, in my opinion, their viewpoints are not actually conflicting. There should be a clearer classification of frames: for freestyle or for cinematic use.
Hey guys, radiomaster just released a gyro board for M12 radio, you plug and it just works. So far its only 2 axis, not three. And +/-45 degrees max. But i bet it would also work for FPV wings with no yaw. Upside that you will also be able to connect a headtracker for goggles at the same time. More info: ru-vid.comUgkx-5xJTb9tXSfc07DJGCLonS91y4AR9hki
Hello, Ivan! I am grateful to You and Steve for lighting and developing this solution, now my Radiomaster Pocket has the capabilities of your Radiomaster MT12! And even more, with the help of Bluetooth HC-05, I also receive telemetry with the track of my models, and it's all in one Pocket! Result video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-H0IxwpZymaA.html
yup i saw that. I tihnk its pretty cool. It has two axis, not three, but might be still ok for the FPV wings. Depends on the angle accuracy and update rate.
fantastic , this is the end of " What mode are you flying " . someone should send this to radiomaster. I thank you and your friends for all the entertainment you bring to us
@@IvanEfimovLimon Yes sir, I have calibrated the gyro and created a DIY reset button for the yaw as well. Everything is working well and fine, but maybe this is because I am using an AIO flight controller with ESCs that have been submerged in water, with two of the ESCs being dead, so the gyro is a bit odd. Every time I stop moving the radio, the gyro suddenly shakes a litte bit. When I swing the radio, the gyro is smooth no jitter, but when I suddenly stop and stay still, the gyro shakes first before stabilizing again. But it's okay, overall it's good. Thank you.
I really love my AOS 5 with HDzero. The only problem is, that it barely fits the freestyle V1. It's definitely the smoothest quad I own ... Great interview!
00:00 - Start 03:00 - This or that game 06:10 - Are we a big deal? 08:26 - Chris's backbround 13:36 - Why Jon doesn't review Rosses frame? 15:30 - When Chris dropped and F bomb? 16:03 - Presets by Rosser 18:50 - People acting like they understand you? 20:25 - Blheli_32 and Rosser 23:43 - Rosser's FPV moneys 25:05 - Motion controller 26:05 - ShitPilot shirt 26:25 - Mr. Steele vs Mr. Rosser drama 53:22 - Batteries testing 40:12 - Being paid for review? 44:43 - Rosser vs racing 48:35 - Bench props testing is irrelevant? 54:49 - Motors up side down? 58:00 - More about Blheli_32 1:01:20 - C-rating 1:04:46 - X-Cell testing that's missing 1:10:32 - Overtightening screws 1:12:15 - Damping grease 1:14:30 - Unidirectional carbon 1:18:41 - Patents in FPV 1:23:10 - One prop blade filter 1:24:42 - We don't get to know your motor size? 1:26:45 - PID toolbox 1:27:30 - UAV Tech vs Bardwell 1:28:20 - Rosser retracts statement? 1:30:05 - TRYP vs Velocidrone clinch 1:32:49 - Rosser's BnFs 1:38:55 - Biggest drama for Rosser? 1:44:45 - Betaflight monopoly is bad? 1:47:15 - Quicksilver? 1:49:40 - Motors heat testing? 1:53:19 - Camera position for droneracing
While watching this video I decided to quickly try Chris Rosser's preset on my 7 inch quad. This quad flew badly before I did this, but when I made another flight with it today using Chris's preset, it flew butter smooth. I suddenly love this 7 inch quad again now. Thanks Chris.
I was pretty confused until now why my AOS 5 v5 didn't come with supernova motors, and I was honestly a little disappointed, especially since even if I change them out myself, the presets probably don't apply anymore due to other kv and response characteristics of the motors... right?
If may suggest something to improve on the current AOS v5 designs it would be camera jiggle. I know that the frames are optimized to minimize resonance propagation to the flight controller, which is great for flight performance, but it seems like this is a tradeoff that causes the resonance to go somewhere else, which in my experience is the camera mount. My AOS 5 V5 flew perfect out of the box, but even slightly damaged props can cause vibrations to show up on the camera feed, which degraded the flying experience a lot even if you cant directly see the vibrations (because of camera sensor properties). I also have the GEPRC Mark 5 and it doesn't have this problem, if also seems to have way stiffer TPU on the camera mount.
Directly showing the advantages of the X-Cell technology is not optional in my opinion. I understand the reasoning for showing the resonance diagrams in the video, that's what people will see, so it makes sense to show that. However, if there is no direct comparison between with and without X-Cell, it's only a marketing term without any prove of it's effectiveness. Even if it is only a small contributor to the overall picture, the effects need to be proven, otherwise it's like a self made "approval" sticker that doesn't have any meaning but leads people to believe the product is better than others, which might not be the case. I don't think that Chris is making this up, he is an engineer at heart and I believe it. But he is also a believer in the scientific method, and that requires reproducible evidence.
Chris's frames may not be open source, but he has always been super helpful when I'm designing 3d prints for his frames, providing files needed to make great parts, and asking me to put my designs on thingiverse 👌 #OpenSourceFTW but I'm giving Chris a pass 😎👍
Thank you for sharing this! I tried this right after I saw this video. But in CLI I can't seem to find any command or parameter related to headtrack. I noticed that you were using the BF 11 debug version. Must I use this specific version to have headtrack parameters? However I can't find the 11 debug version, I can only find PWA 11 normal version. Thank you!
