@@REDEYE111 yeah

@@TechReflex Could you help me which one is good to use powerline or wifi extender??

@@REDEYE111 Haven't tested any power line ones, and I am not sure how reliable they are.

@@TechReflex Well, I have read about on it quora so I thought you have some more idea on it or you have already any video on it. So I asked you about it?

@@TechReflex Thanks for replying buddy 😇 .

@@fxeditors haha, I did do that in an AMD video. Idk about the views, many creators have been observing reduced views post COVID. I've also reduced my uploading frequency, as I've taken on other projects.

@@prasanna5836 Their EA1000s are really amazing, this is very good for the price too. If you want under this range, EA500LM is also VERY competitive.

@@khaqansaleem :)

@@TechReflex seriously mjhy kbhi goru nay koi technical fix ni dia, mostly it comes from IT gurus of India, respect from Pakistan.

@@msd1611 won't rule out the possibility, also check it's color gamut percentage to confirm.

No

@@karbiberlitavuklupilav1046 yeah

And G-Sync? ​@@TechReflex

:-)

@@SudarshanAshiya this will of course also go down during sales.

Will ask them.

You may have to get the battery changed (may cost 3-4K) and make sure it doesn't show any errors like F02 while starting up.

@@TechReflex thanks for the info

Probably not.

How is the sound quality? Is there any annoying noise while playing music or not playing music? Please let me know.

I don't think that anyone, including HPZ is claiming that this is a new product or is superior to the regular version in any way. When I constantly referred to "pureplay series having a distinct aesthetic", and "audiophiles keep raving about the quality of this series", I did assume that people who are familiar with Lypertek would know about them. I also don't understand your issues with the marketing here, because I don't think anyone is claiming that the HPZ version of any product is better/has more features than the regular version. It's more like HPZ giving it a recommendation by getting their own logo added to it, and them also being big enough that brands are ready to make customized items for their store. With a quick google search, anyone can find the regular versions as well, so doesn't make sense to 'hide' that part intentionally in videos. Also, why do you think that by default a products 'should' have some cons? This isn't a smartphone, it's just a basic earbud, if it delivers is most areas where would you find a 'con'? I had included a long rant about the app being bad, but then I found the info on their website that they declared that their version just doesn't support the app, which may have been done to just avoid the discussion of the app altogether. And I did mention about the interference noise.

@@TechReflex #1 "I don't think that anyone, including HPZ is claiming that this is a new product or is superior to the regular version in any way. When I constantly referred to "pureplay series having a distinct aesthetic", and "audiophiles keep raving about the quality of this series", I did assume that people who are familiar with Lypertek would know about them." I didn't say you or HZ is claiming that this is a new/superior product. However, is that the same as choosing to omit the disclaimer in a review of said product that this is only a rebranding and a minor one at that? Secondly, you are referring to a series of products (per your admittance), why not the product itself. Can you see why this might cause confusion to an average Joe who might not be familiar with Lypertek or their recent offerings? It's a simple thing, instead of raving about the series, it would have been easier and clearer for the viewer if you just said that the Pureplay Z3 has been around and has proved itself over these years. #2 "I also don't understand your issues with the marketing here, because I don't think anyone is claiming that the HPZ version of any product is better/has more features than the regular version. It's more like HPZ giving it a recommendation by getting their own logo added to it, and them also being big enough that brands are ready to make customized items for their store." Simple question to you - You wouldn't raise an eyebrow if Samsung for example, re-introduced the original Buds Pro, no matter how good they were at the time, made no improvements to any of the features and yet added an Amazon logo and marketed them again 4 years later and reviewers make no mention of the fact that they have been around for a while? All I'm saying is this move raises red flags for me and I've seen a couple of comments here itself reflecting the same sentiment. HZ is a business enterprise and they are well within their rights to use any legal marketing strategy to sell more units of a product. I do not have an issue with the strategy they used, however, I do have an issue with reviewers brushing off this detail as something that should have been understood and not mention it even as a piece of information that the consumer should be aware of. If this is a paid promotion, which I'm sure is a necessary part of any business and there's nothing wrong with that as long as there is a disclaimer in the video itself. If it's not a paid promotion, I don't understand why reviewers would omit such a detail. #3 "With a quick google search, anyone can find the regular versions as well, so doesn't make sense to 'hide' that part intentionally in videos." I'll take your word for it and perform a search. This is what I get from a "quick" google search in India. In the top 10 search results, 3 are from HZ promoting the product, 2 from Lypertek themselves and 5 from various reviews around the world published in 2021. I'm not sure how this google search would have helped me figure out if this is indeed a new product or just a minor rebranding of something that was launched years back. Forgive me, if you think it's that simple and SEO is not a thing that brands do for marketing, you might be a little out of touch with consumer ground reality. #4 "Also, why do you think that by default a products 'should' have some cons? This isn't a smartphone, it's just a basic earbud, if it delivers is most areas where would you find a 'con'? I had included a long rant about the app being bad, but then I found the info on their website that they declared that their version just doesn't support the app, which may have been done to just avoid the discussion of the app altogether. And I did mention about the interference noise." If buying consumer electronics has taught us anything especially as Indians, be it a smartphone or a "basic" earbud (although I don't think there's anything basic about the technology behind them), it's that everything has flaws and nothing is perfect. If someone pushes a product and says there are no flaws or as in this case, mention a flaw which people have been complaining for years about (reflected in the app's reviews), but absolve the seller just because they declared on their website that app support is absent, now we're back to the illusion that the product has no flaws. I get that these are targeted towards audiophiles, but not even a mention of the call quality, fit and comfort, connectivity, firmware updates, etc.? You will forgive me again if I don't think this review is balanced. These points are critical, but they are meant to be constructive for a review. Please see them as they are if you can. The seller/brand can market their products however they wish, it will always be my responsibility aided by reviewers like you to make good purchasing decisions for the hard-earned money I spend. I might even buy these earbuds, but that's a decision I would take despite knowing their flaws and accepting them because the pros make it a good deal for me. A good way to avoid buyer's remorse.