for sure you should have played a5 not bishop d7 you either fianchetto in kings indian or sack it on h3 in certain scenarios but you usually delay its development until middle game
Happy Birthday 🎊 Just saw this video it is the first time hearing of you. However I guess I died after „I hate myself“ 😂😂😂 I felt this one. Chess is the most brutal game. Giving your all and getting punished directly for once overlooking some. I am stuck in the 1700 area since almost 2 years. I kinda stopped playing. It is impossible to gain points. You have to learn a hell of an opening repertoire and it is just way to much. However keep up the good work.
Also, you need to get better at accepting own blunders instead of immediate self-hate. Bigger or smaller blunders do happen even in higher ranks, and according to Stockfish you were just 0,7 down. You still had a fairly even game there yet you gave up :/ Good luck next time though :)
29:47 with 2:42 on clock, you spent 1min 31s trying to find some miraculous way to save a dead pawn. I think that's a good example of where to improve your time usage imo, recognizing which moves are important and not spending over half of your remaining time over a single unimportant move. EDIT after watching further - well, your continuation was literally "I don't have much time so I have to play this" and blunder the game away. So the minute and half spent on the previous pawn move literally cost you the game here :/
I think that if you are going to offer advice like this then you may want to consider being more specific. Which move did you see where he was passive and which move do you think would have been more active? Specifically which moves would be more helpful. 🤷♂️
8 seconds spent on queen takes queen. After saying to his opponent "that's why you shouldn't play your moves so quickly!" Quick judgements can be tricky.
It was so obvious, after each move ask yourself a question: What does my opponent want to do? Afer seeing video lenght I knew that someone will hang a piece in one move and rage quit.
Can you not see that he was already doing that? He considered where the knight would move if he attacked it with the pawn, and considered where he would move after bg4. The problem was NOT that he didn't ask what the opponent would do, it's just that he had a blind spot for F3 being undefended, likely because there were so many pieces around that square that he subconsciously assumed it was defended.
What you should do while waiting for your opponent to move : look over both your positions and your opponent, calculating possible moves. You do that already but can do more. Then, you will be less likely to blunder. Stop apologizing. May I suggest you watch Apexchess. He is real good. I think you will pick up a few things.
