A Phoney Baloney 

Exactly !!!

Thank you!!!!!!

👏👏👏

👌🏾👌🏾

I've never understood why ppl comment on ppls body appearance. Even laughing at someone's style is juvenile in my opinion. Adults are worse for it and I believe adults are why children bully other children. It's a vicious cycle of learning at home and continuing to pass it down from generation to generation.

The best thing I've learned from this show: always always always cover your butt with a paperwork trail

My Dad had a rental maintence clause in his contract/rental agreement. Once a month standard maintenance and a yearly clause and inspection. If costs to repair, replace found damage was over $100 I. Materials and labor, the tenant was charge for the bill to be paid in 30 days. If not paid they get a warning..then 2nd warning upon3rd warning and eviction notice was sent .

Good. 😊

me 2,NY

@@Pinchington crayon and toilet paper 😂

I don’t know her age, but she looks great!

The good old 2000’s zig zag part!!

Yes! I noticed that too. I've tried that with my own hair and it never comes our right.

I can barely do one even part in a straight line

Yes and she has a very fit look very physically fit too, I'd like arms like hers....

This show is the only thing that keeps me up at night 😭😭

@@TriniPerez459 lol same!

Lucky you, I have to wait till I get off work but it's my entertainment for my ride home

You ain't lied 🤣

Can I tell u

Universal equalizer!

I don't see anything wrong with her.

Its similar to when you are a child late for class and you walk in and everyone turns to look at you.....apparently I lived on CPT as a kid 😄

@@lindatoombs3319 interesting because they didn’t say her they said everyone

That’s exactly what I came here to say 😂 i would hv definitely argued that i was planning on cleaning everything the very last day n take pictures N then they couldn’t bc they locked them out… Why didnt they say that?

I just said this

@@emlauren6586 they were being honest This case could go south for him if the dude just said he hadn't received the call about the sister checking the apartment

@@chrissyplus5730 ."I just said this" ... DonziGT230 said it one year ago you said it 10 month s ago .

because plaintiff admitted to telling them they were "mostly" out

Holy crap you know it girl lol. I’ve recently lost some weight so I have the skinny bat wings lol. It’s so weird.

Batwing, haha omg I freaking love you. But I agree, I was super impressed by her arms!

🥰🥰🥰

I call them “Bingo wings”.

Yessss! She looks great !

Most landlord laws are supposed to clean the carpets, replace blinds and re paint the walls after each tenant. Yet this is never brought up in her court. Normal wear on rugs and walls are to expected!!! She gives the landlords to much credit.

She can handle herself? lol.....

painting should be normal wear and tear, the place should be painted anyways after a new tenant moves out.

exactly! i said the same thing. he moved someone else into the home on their time, so they didn't get a chance to finish cleaning up. They could have saved hundreds of dollars by cleaning up in a couple days.

My mind is on that too. Especially her awarding plaintiffs for lockbox. Almost like a wrongful eviction move.

I wish we had seen her exit video.

@@dbabies82 They were sunk by their testimony saying they were almost moved out - if they said - we still had to fully clean the place and they changed the locks on us then they might have chance of having that considered. Remember they said they had mentioned they had already steam cleaned

@@user-uy6uc5ey5q you didn’t hear the part where they locked it up early and even if they did say they mostly moved out but regardless they’re PAID TIL THE LAST DAY!!!!!

Lmao

🤣🤣

Looks like she was burned.

@@guineapig4701 I think she’s actually had some sort of impact injury to her face and had bones put back together again. The skin looks fine aside from the scarring (could be from cuts and/or where pins were, too-lacks the “melted” look and fusion of burns), but the shape beneath is off, like a surgeon had to reassemble broken jaw, eye sockets, nose and cheekbones but didn’t get them quite right. ETA: Just got a look at a clear surgical scar across her jaw and I’m even more convinced someone very good reconstructed her facial bones at some point.

She looks like a Dr Suess character

@@gan-ban6083 I thought the same thing

Agreed

Landlords have bills to pay too. They don't want to sink more money into a property because people are slobs. Why would you want to trash where you live?

Its the part I always look forward to 😂

I skip it everytime 😂

Lmao ikr !!!!

Yesss that was it back in the day. I use to do mine as a side part, then do the swoop bang into a low ponytail in the back.

@@KLARIE_ARCH that sounds really cute.

That was a style at one time

That carpet was nasty and more than "wear and tear".

Right. Maybe the carpet but the painting no. They said they were going to paint regardless so why charge them for the painting? I feel like the judge forgets things said ...

If there more than normal wear and tare it’s not unreasonable to ask for that to be the tenants responsibility. Slobs don’t get a pass.

Actually, there is. If they’ve damaged the property, or gone beyond normal wear and tear, a landlord shouldn’t just have to absorb that cost. Some tenements abuse properties, and when they do, they need to pay.

LOL UR IGNORANT

You expect brand new carpeting every time you move into a new place? No, it’s not typical for landlords to replace carpeting or professionally clean hardwood floors between tenants. It’s also not typical for landlords to completely repaint an entire unit between tenants. Yes, they might do some touch up work here and there, but if we’re talking all walls and trim need to be repainted, that’s at the previous tenants’ expense (or the previous tenants do that work themselves before moving out). The rental property might be new to you, but if it’s not a completely refurbished unit, you get what you get.

@@mikesteele05 yes I do expect the rugs to be replaced and a new coat of paint.

@@naturalbluti6823 maybe a regional thing, but I assume you’re talking about carpeting and not a rug. Wall to wall carpeting in an entire house is going to run thousands of dollars. No landlord is going to replace that out of his or her own pocket every time a year lease is up.

Unless the carpeting is completely trashed or over a certain number of years old (depending on what state you live in) no landlord is going to replace carpeting between each tenant, especially if it's got a high turnover rate.

I don't expect a landlord to replace the carpet but it should be a RED FLAG if the landlord DOES NOT paint or get the carpet professionally shampooed in-between tenants!! That is just veil to think a landlord is that cheap that he would NOT do that! When it comes to building apartments it is MANDATORY to do so! So when landlords rent apartments in houses they shouldn't cut corners because that is how possible infestations can start and the new tenant may want to bring a case! I'm from NY and I've seen it happen with my neighbors.

As it is highly likely that the landlord has already found a new tenant to occupy the unit and collect the deposit and monthly rent. You don't have to be that smart to figure this out.

You must not watch a lot of these episodes. It's pretty easy to figure out. Most of the time tenants move into a place on the first of the month. It is uncommon for a lease to start later in the month. Because of that, when a tenant stays a day late it makes it much difficult to get a new tenant to come in for that month. Although, if the landlord does get somebody in partway through the month they can only charge the previous tenant for the amount of time that apartment was vacant. And in this case, the tenants only got back half a month because they were still using the place for the first two weeks and locked out the second two weeks. You still need to pay for what you use. Courts make you whole; they don't exist to give you free rides

I can't imagine after living somewhere for years and be expected to clean the carpets. Maybe landlords should only have hardwood lol

same in NC

Very beautiful Ms PA.

Usually the paint and carpets are expected to last a certain amount of time like a couple of years.

They all use the cheapest crap then try to charge you for it every time!

Landlords are not required to repaint between tenants. If you leave an apartment in need of repainting, expect the landlord to charge you for it.

@@mikesteele05 Hi Mike! I would NEVER move into ANY house, condo or apartment that wasn't freshly painted. It doesn't concern me now but in the past each and every dwelling was freshly painted...and the landlords did it automatically....they felt that their new tenants DESERVED the ENTIRE place to be as new as possible....if it wasn't painted then I wouldn't move in! Didn't know landlords could get away with NOT painting the place. I also had brand new carpeting in EVERY place I rented! No paint and no new rugs meant...."DO NOT RENT"!! Thanks for this info!!

@@joannekaczan6615 this will not happen in the vast majority of instances. You must be moving into newly refurbished places, and you’re paying for that. New carpeting for an entire house is going to cost upwards of $10,000. If you move out of a home after your year lease ends, do you think the landlord is going to rip out that year old carpet and spend thousands of dollars to replace it for the next tenant?

@@mikesteele05 by law they are supposed to replace blinds, clean or replace carpets and re paint the walls after each tenant. They can't charge each tenant. That's a racket and they know damn well. I've never moved into a new apt with fresh paint. Most landlords skip doing it.

@@mikesteele05 there's no law for it but that's been a thing for eons, in between tenants the apt gets repainted & carpeted. used to happen all the time, today they won't do it anymore. but that's a very old very well known thing.

Do you not understand how damages work? Do you not understand you still need to pay for what you use?

@@JasonQuestsyou missed his question big time😂

@@assetprotection5389 Nope. You missed how damages work

Happy Saturday

agree

No. They only got part of the security deposit back. That is not winning. It was dirty.

I know. I usually don't read the comments until more than halfway through.

No carbs or calories....

Because in civil court all these decisions are up to the judge's discretion. Unlike criminal court where the judge has to follow strict legal guidelines and protocols

Normal wear would be something like if the carpets are 15 years old and are just generally worn looking and need to be steam cleaned or replaced. That’s how long carpeting usually lasts, so it’s expected that they’ll be worn looking. So that type of routine maintenance is up to the landlord. The landlord will want to clean or replace the carpeting in order to maintain or increase the rental value of the property. So that’s not a previous tenant’s responsibility. But let’s say there’s a giant stain in the middle of the carpet from where a tenant spilled something. In that instance, it’s not normal wear; it’s just a stain due to the tenant’s negligence. The landlord is essentially forced to clean or replace that carpet in order to make the space suitable for renting again. In that instance, the previous tenant is responsible for paying. When it comes to painting, there’s not cut and dry criteria. A landlord isn’t going to be able to justify repainting the entire apartment at the cost of the previous tenant simply because the tenant leaves one scuff mark on the steps. But in this instance, it was clear that the steps and interior of the entryway needed to be completely repainted, because the tenants had thoroughly scuffed up the walls. They may not have done it purposely, but it was enough damage that a landlord would need to repaint in order to rent it out again. So it’s really up to the judge to determine if a landlord is justified in keeping a security deposit.

@@mikesteele05 this case was unusually short I didn't hear her ask questions like how long did they live there, did they receive a letter stating what the damages were and what the deductions were for deposit within 30 days. At first, I assumed she didn't ask any of the questions bc the landlord violated by locking the tenants out early, and bc of that the case was an automatic win for plaintiffs. The walls didn't look terrible, painting is considered sanitizing and is required where I am from bc of that, and in most cases, I've watched the judge deny money to be allotted for painting. Even when there were swiss cheese walls in some cases bc ppl are going to hang pics, decor, and electrics. In my opinion, the walls didn't require a loss of money for renters. Now the carpet yes. However, there is usually a process the landlord has to show they had it cleaned and the stains didn't come out and so now it needs to be replaced. I didn't hear her ask for receipts for carpet or quotes for paint or for hiring the painters. It was an unusually short case. I commented that myself. Maybe they ran out of taping time or maybe I missed those questions.

Exactly what I was thinking. And those carpet "stains" looked like wet spots....maybe staged for the court case? He didn't even have to show any receipts...

@@aprilpinkelton4385 my guess is this information was all in their written statements. The judge generally asks questions to which she already has the answers in written statements, just so the cases make sense to viewers. You notice that a lot of times, she’ll ask a question, someone will begin the answer, and then the judge will finish answering to speed the process along. I’m sure in the written statements, both parties confirm how long the tenancy lasted. As for the painting between tenants, it’s not legally required in the vast majority of instances. When it comes to keeping spaces sanitary by repainting, that’s really only in regards to kitchens and bathrooms, and repainting isn’t the only way to ensure that the walls are sanitary (it’s often just the easiest). But yeah, if you put holes in the wall to hang things, it’s your responsibility to either appropriately patch and repaint those walls, or the landlord can withhold some of your deposit. The judge won’t demand that the walls look brand new, but they need to be properly patched and painted.

Search for it on RU-vid…they might lol

Yes you are right. Too much "I don't know"

I'm disgusted that the judge didn't just let the plaintiffs win the whole case when she was told they were illegally locked out of their home and forced them to pay for "damages" that is everyday wear and tear... literally she went from a decent judge to Judge matthias with the way she talks down to people and intterupts them when they are answering her questions

Well said! 😉👌🏽

Exactly! Yeah judge Judy would have never had them charge for paint. Most places you have to repaint every three years anyway. And if they were locked out they weren’t given a chance to clean they still had a week left to clean the apartment.

Her father IS a Contractor

@@stephaniehowe0973 se should ask him about those things

The tenants provided the proof that allowed to him to keep it. I didnt hear her ask how long they lived there. The carpet is ruined. Not every landlord repaints

@@stephaniehowe0973 Tenants did help the landlord, for me they should have only to pay the light, the rest was tear and wear, like the stairs, how you think you can walk up the stairs without marking them? I a my self a landlord and I would never make them pay for those things, if they stayed 3 years at least

@@gusvieira6140 He’s deceased but I think her brother is a contractor as well

😂😂

to be fair we don't know how much left they still had to clean since they were illegally locked out of their home in mid november... kinda not fair to blame them when they didn't even get a chance to finish cleaning before the landlord locked them out and started painting right away

Great point!

Most children use diapers and toilets. Most dogs and cats don't

@@deerell6022 it’s more often than not, that a child wets their bed,writes or paints on a wall,puts things,and flushes things down the toilet,throws objects out windows, and the parents are oblivious,until something else happens because of it. Pets are way more trainable.

Umm because that would be considered housing discrimination to charge an extra deposit for having a child.

@@meghanr6a899 ...That’s my point,in a way...There are many people that consider their pets as part of the family, and not a disposable thing, that has no value or worth...and yet, they are being discriminated against monetarily,for what their version of family is...

yes, they can hear the intro.

Many many Landlords do not do this

She’s trying to be the new Judge Judy.

I don’t think it was that deep lol

@@tessabiggs2917 I don't think Judge Judy would say that.

It is true that the Judge at the beginning of her time on this show was more calm and polite. She would listen more and explain especially with Spanish expressions to get her point across. Too bad that somehow she thinks she needs to behave this way.

Well said Davies and Tom because its so true, I feel she has changed so much and she has such a smart smug mouth now, her character and how she behaves is of low character and I find in a lot of the trials she gets it wrong! I know she studies the cases the night before and makes her ruling however I believe if she comes across someone she doesn't like, she might change her ruling on the day of! The lady decided to move out halfway through November so even if he started painting & changed the locks they still allowed her to go in and retrieve things and take photo so she either should get nothing or I think he should only pay back one week rent not half.