The plaintiff, who works for a pet rescue center, says the defendant purchased a puppy but gave it away and canceled the deposit, so the plaintiff is suing . The defendant argues the puppy was sick when he got it.
defendant is disgusting! dishonest! such a liar and thief! if he had taken the puppy to a vet he would have a report from a veterinarian. So glad that Milian gave it to him. My guess is he sold the dog. prayers for the puppy.
@@annereidy7981Did he really think he could win with a picture of a stained couch and some poop on the floor? The puppy wasn’t even in the pictures-not that it would have made much difference! He could have gotten those pics off the internet! What a joke!
Mr. Fivehead tried his best to put on his concerned poor little victim face. Judge Milian and anybody else who saw his pathetic attempts were not fooled. A truly terrible human being.
It’s not an adoption fee, they are selling puppies, plain and simple. No reputable rescue would ask a $775 adoption fee. They aren’t screening they are just taking money
@@namenamr4460 I understand northern rescues have a higher adoption fee than southern rescues because vetting costs are higher but not $775. That is BS. And I’m not even sure they altered the puppies before they sold them
@@oldageisdumb I've worked in animal shelters and $75.00 would cover the surgery, vaccines and a vet visit. You know these people weren't doing that. Some places are even lower like $40.00.
@@namenamr4460 Please be careful, though. You are confusing animal shelters and rescues. No where, even in the cheapest places can you do FULL vetting for $75. City shelters charge those prices because they are subsidized by the city. Even at the very lowest cost spay/neuter places, full vetting (spay/neuter, chip, hw test, dhpp, bordatella, rabies) would be around $150. Rescues could not exist if they asked an adoption fee of $75 because we don’t get city funding like animal services.
He claims he had vet bills but didn't bring them. Though he claims the dog was sick and not fit for purchase but rather than give it back, gave it away.
I think Judge Judy would have paid more attention and thrown them both out for scamming. At 2:19 she says they don't take deposits. At 2:35 she says she took his deposit.
@@DC-lf8fjShe was not a scammer! She said they normally didn’t do deposits, but they made an exception because there was a high demand due to the rescue having a litter of golden retrievers. He told her he lived 3 hours away and really wanted one of the dogs, so she let him put a deposit down electronically (PayPal) to hold one of the puppies for him. Only one scammer here.
The guy saying purebred dogs are better doesn't understand genetics. Pure-breeding has lead to more health issues in breeds (more dalmations are born deaf, large giant dogs tend to have hip dysplasia, chihuahuas tend to have higher rates of hypoglysimia, etc). Mutts arent purfect, but have lower occurances of the health issues that their parent breeds do.
This is why I believe shelters should after a few months go to the house of the person who adopted the dog and make sure the dog is fine and happy. The shelter by me did this when I adopted and rescued my mutt (she was a mix of english setter, yellow lab, and a few others I can't remember (did a dna test). About three months after I adopted my girl. The shelter since an employee over for a check up. Said everything was fine and healthy. And moved on with their lives. And years and years later I took her back to the shelter after she died for cremation. And the one lady who was there when I adopted my girl remembered her and cried with me. At first I didn't like the idea of the check up (which the shelter told me they'd do when I adopted her, they just didn't say when, it was a surprise show up). But now I'm starting to think it isn't a bad idea. Because at least the shelter knows if the dog is happy, living in a good environment, etc.
DAM! The Camera man kind of did the defendant dirty by slowly zooming in on his face as Judge is ripping him a new A-Hole. kind of feel bad for him... But, a lot of claims, and no proof. 8:15
Before I even watched it I knew the defendant was guilty. He standing up there thinking he as cool as The Fonz. Goofball… and the way they zoomed the camera in on his face when the judge scolded him was priceless. He looked like he was ready to burst out in tears like a toddler🤣😂🤣😂
Defendant had NOT A GREAT cleft palate surgeon. He should really go back and have that redone. They can do a better job now, get it fixed so that it doesn't show as bad.
Lot's of rescues have that rule that you have to give them back the animal if your circumstances change. I'm surprised to learn that is not enforceable.
What an astounding coincidence! Somebody stole his identity on PayPal just in time to cover his tracks on an illegal puppy sale. Guy must be doing something right.
7:27 Ridiculous that this woman or anybody else really believes that a pure red dog wouldn't end up abandon. Or abused. Monsters do not discriminate !!
Alright gang. We have another troll in the room. RamonMartinez likes to shout out spoilers. Downvote him to oblivion or bump a better comment to the top.
That's kind of you for checking the comment section before watching the video. There's 12 comments at this point. Three directly say that the plantiff wins just in different ways.
This is the second or third time I've seen him do this. Yes, we don't mind people talking about the outcome, but just yelling the final verdict is annoying. Looks like we have another Adrian.
Hopefully this was also a lesson for the plaintiff. There's a reason your workplace doesn't take certain forms of payment. Don't get your own personal finances in the middle of an expensive purchase like this.
The guy made up a story to help him save face when the tv show airs. it sounds like a story that could possibly be true - but it still doesnt excuse him claiming to paypal that it was an unauthorized transaction - theres simply no excuse for that.
Normally with a Rescue if you can’t keep the pet it goes back to them by contract. He didn’t buy the dog… it is an adoption and the money goes back to the org to do more work.
That's why cash will always be king. People pay for services or real goods with credit cards or electronic payments, and once they get the goods or service, they'll dispute the charges and the seller takes the loss. He had no proof whatsoever that the puppy was sick.
