As mentioned in the intro, we tried our best to also reach out to feminist AND radical feminist organizations in Korea for interviews, but did not hear back from most of them or had some pull out in the last minute. Help us reach them if you want to get the other side.
The fact that the feminist/women's orgs pulled out last minute while this guy can be so forthright and undaunted speaks volumes to the gender inequities in South Korea: there exists real, deleterious repercussions for women, while men can live unharmed, unbothered, untouched.
Maybe you should have waited until _you_ had both sides interviewed to release content like this. The fact you didn't and released it anyway says a lot about your standards here.
@@SoSoKaylaSo, the "feminists" keep running away and we don't hear anything from anyone!? They actually had the courtesy to put this so very elegantly.
When it comes to job,please decide based on the skills and merits and not gender. For instance, if the women is hella strong,as strong as men,she can be firefighter,I have no issue cus I would trust her to save me. In the end, regardless of gender,can the person fulfill his/her responsibilities competently? This is the final question. Lets work on making our differences bring forth progress.
We also want to focus on abilities and strengths rather than gender. That's also the basic position for those who oppose Korean feminism. However, in Korea, gender is considered more important than ability and strengths, and women are provided with much easier passing standards than men. Also, in Korea, there are many cases where female police run away from victims. I want you to know this situation.
Men and women are physically different and we have to accept that, but we are equal in spirit as well; there are circumstances in our lives that we have to depend on each other.
@kodura vivasayi "This" in this case means "I agree". If you say you agree wih someone, then by your definition, you saying something that is not valuable.
This man participated in this video to show all the viewers how much of a loser he is like most korean men. No wonder korean women don't want to get married.
So he wants to have only men in the police force. How does he think a man is going to scan a womans body without being inappropriate? Spoiler altert, there is no way in doing that, that's why usually you always need a woman come to scan the body. How is he thinking a man can properly respond to a woman that has been raped? Spoiler alert, woman are less likely to report a rape if the person she is reporting it to, is a man. There was also a story of a police man raping a woman that came half naked to the police station to make a rape report. This guy seems to be delusional and lacks proper knowledge about the simplest things.
Totally agree, it seems that korea is majorly male dominated and when some women try to point this out and demand change they feel threatened so they say things from their privileged perspective and act as a victim when 95% of the time it doesn’t even affect them.
@@lovetsumugi.a He said women aren't made for that job because of their physique, so you want me to believe that he thinks some women should still work there? Your logic doesn't make any sense.
Lets be honest, Men and Women are built differently. lets not be blind about that. A woman have to work harder than a man to have a strong built and carry out heavy duties and roles like fire fighter, policeman, soldier, etc. And a man have much more stamina than a woman. There are even experiments where woman and man who are fire fighters compete with each other on who will knock down a door in case a victim is trap inside a room where there is a fire. The woman can't knock down the door at once, she tried so many times but she cant even tho she is built. But the man knocked it down in one blow. Entering in a workforce like this, where life and death is at stake, do we really need to have a gender issue? The job will be given to the one who is more SUITABLE for the job and not just because of a gender. And a police job is not just about scanning a woman's body, its about protecting the welfare of the citizen in the country.
@@kkrata8221 look again it's pretty evident in society and I am pretty happy men are waking up and pointing it out, are you a misandrist by the way? Do you hate men? Because only misandrists say misandry doesn't exist😏
I believe they are superior in some ways. But again, in some ways women are also superior to us men. The most important thing probably in our society nowadays for it to function properly, is physical work which generally makes men superior to women. And also, obeying someone doesn't mean that there is no equality. As your statement is suggesting, there should also be no hierarchy in the military e.g. since there are lieutenants, generals etc. The feminism you perceive as of today is what should be hated, since it completely shits on equality and disregards basic human nature (e.g. the male instinct to protect) with feminists saying things like: "I DONT NEED YOU TO PROTECT ME, JUST DONT HURT ME!!"). Of course there still are feminsts that *truly* aim for equality but this mindset unfortunately has a severe lack of supporters nowadays.
@@samihindi Physical work is less important in modern society than ever? It's increasingly getting replaced by more service type work. (something women are better at since women tend to have better social skills generally because of all types of reasons) And why should women obey men according to you? Male instinct to protect? Don't women have an instinct to protect? What?
@@dehistoriapisciumfish7639 if men stop working even for a week. The whole world will go through an economic crisis. What are you talkin about. I'm all about equality but you have to agree that there are many things which only men can do better. It's not even that hard to digest
He's one of the best interviewers. I subscribe his channel and each time he asks the questions to the guest, I always admire his skill. Exact point I was curious, and he mentions.
A point he made was that men are often victims of false rape accusations, or that men are less likely to be taken seriously when it comes to incidents of sexual assault. Or even that only men are required to have military service. Why do you think this is? This is a result of the patriarchy’s system, which has taught gender roles that have portrayed men as strong, dominant, and people to want sexual intercourse and as women to be weak, submissive, and obedient. When this image is given to men because women are perceived as weak and submissive they often gain the benefit of the doubt and therefore not able to commit sexual assault or even lie about it since they are so weak according to the image put upon them, and men are seen as wanting sex, therefore not taken seriously in these cases. And because women are seen as weak, even men who know they cannot do the military service are required to do so because they are perceived as strong and dominant which is an issue men face in South Korea a lot. The issue of being likely to be sent to prison, the gender being mandatorily given military enlistment or to be not taken seriously as a sexual assault victim is caused by the patriarchy. It affects men and women as well. Many issues men’s rights say men experience as proof of inequality for men is simply just a byproduct of the patriarchal images set by gender roles.
@@lilac2698 The age old system that has existed till date is patriarchal and they set all the rules. Won't you agree with this? So, gender roles were created by men and followed and supported by women. I don't think there were any matriarchal societies. So the society is to be blamed. A society which is patriarchal (it includes men AND women who continue to degrade women and place men on a pedestal.) Several times a woman is herself another woman's enemy. So many MOTHERS teach their daughters to be submissive and ideal in their behavior. So women are at fault too. But, as a whole men created this system and several women continued to support it. So, all in all its society's fault. The men began the oppression. Women were told to mold themselves a certain way, and in doing so they created a mould for the men too. They painted a definitive picture of what a male must be and what a female must be. They forgot that men and women both have weaknesses which they should be covering on behalf of each other. Men and women must collaborate, not compete. In any case, currently women are on the lower end. Feminism is required to bring them up to where men are. Women are already strong but there is an issue with the way that society perceives that strength. Feminism is required so that a woman can stand eye to eye with a man and hold his hand in order to collaborate. This is MY OPINION, don't come onto me.
@Unni Unni Like literally, for so many years patriarchy fashioned women in accordance to its own needs. Prostitution, slavery, child bearing name the crime and its up there. (**Child bearing is not a crime, it is essential for the survival of the species but not if the woman does not want to bear) Didn't patriarchy for so long change women (and men) the way it wanted to change them (aka, on its own whims). Like c'mon patriarchy is the definition of hypocrisy. Some feminists might be hypocrites but patriarchy literally invented the word lmao 🤣😂😆😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣
@Unni Unni Also, you act as if men as saints. Now imagine if the society was predominantly matriarchal and there was an uprising of mennists (😂😂), wouldn't they just target the matriarchal system in accordance to their own specific needs. Like c'mon those men would have been tortured for centuries, I would cut them some slack. Anyways, You use 'feminist' as if it's a ducking curse word. So be it, I am a crazy feminist *****, so no point arguing with me right?
@@aldaoroman This feminist/woke movement has´f up so many societies destroyed so many marriages and potential marriages beause they hate the traditional mother role. This hook up "culture" and hot girl summers has created hordes of low quality girls which have nothing to offer to society and will be single, not married in their 50s when it is too late for most.
@@samuraijosh1595 why do men get to force women to wear makeup? If it’s truly about equality, just leave everyone alone. No one should get to dictate what someone else does. If a woman doesn’t feel like wearing makeup, it’s her right
@@samuraijosh1595 you're crazy, why should people that don't wear makeup get ostracized? That's sexism with extra steps, just say you hate "ugly" women
@@samuraijosh1595Imagine forcing women to put make up. Men getting mad and calling women lazy for not wearing makeup deserve to get their rights taken away for being ridiculous.
now i'm back here again after watching the news about a korean streamer Jammi killed herself because of so many korean incels that think like this guy and actually part of this guy's community bullied her on the internet way too much. So many korean men are ridiculing, bullying korean women if they 'seem like' feminists or whatsoever. They do that for fun and look, a young innocent woman left this world, also her mother because of the internet bullying of incels in korea. And the guy in this interview still saying korea is already equal and feminists in korea are radical, misandrists? nah.
Came back here because of the same reason. She didn’t even say she was a feminist or said anything “controversial” herself, another incel streamer “exposed” her as a feminist and all the incels followers went to bully her
But wasn't that more of a case of how severe bullying is in Korea? Same thing happened to a guy during the same week, a volleyball player. To an outsider it looks like bullying is more of an issue in SK, followed by lack of support/mental health services to prevent suicide, both of which happen to both genders 😢
@@theodora_pilates It was specifically because an incel youtuber “outted” her as a feminist and all his incels followers started to attack her because he said she was a feminist. She didn’t even say anything but if she was a feminist, that’s not a crime either.
Okay so I roughly wrote my opinions down for some things that I found most controversial said by him. 6:28 he said "not a single man thinks we should not correct the wrongs done to women" This is absolutely wrong. There are many many men and even some women that don't take the victim's side and this leads to victim blaming. This is very common. And everyone knows it. If you ever say that victims of harassment and abuse against women have always received support there wouldn't be cases where the victims were not given justice. It's the complete opposite of it. 7:20 he asked what would citizens benefit from increasing the quota of women representatives in the government. Idk about Korea, but I'm from India. And if we raised the quota of female representatives in our Parliament we would benefit oh so much. Marital rape isn't considered as rape in India. Its fairly legal. If we increase the quota of female representatives, we might get more chances to getting closer to abolishing and amending laws that are against women. We can get closer to legally holding people accountable for their deeds. I'm sure there are many laws in Korea too, that includes utter misogyny and no liberalism for women. 8:30 despite women and men being physically and emotionally different, gender equality narrates that a man or woman regardless of their authenticity and differences should be treated equally. Gender Harmony will only come from that. They are provided the same respect, the same pay for equal work, the same appreciation and recognition based on how they perform. Regardless of their gender. Not based on it. 20:00 again, he's only seeing things from one side. I totally understand no man should be falsely charged for violence, but as he said in 6:28 that no men want women to be harmed which means he thinks that women are always protected. Which is so not true. He's only protesting that men are falsely accused, not focusing on when women are too, not served justice and sometimes their cases not even filed and nobody believes them or asks them to let it go "because men will be men". 23:05 I don't take the woman's side at all, because what she did was wrong. But the man could've called the police and held the woman accountable for property damage. The cops would've taken responsibility following that. It's simple as that. 28:30 I think what the women meant was to encourage young kids to not fall for beauty standards because they are toxic. Some people might like to wear makeup and that's okay. But idk why it's called "self care"? It can mean different things to different people. Makeup is used for various purposes, for looking presentable to toxic beauty standards. What the feminist movement was to drop these toxic beauty standards and like your bare face. What's Wrong With that. 30:06 seriously?? You think this is all imaginary hate towards men?? After what all men do? I can't even. You think you respect women because you love your wife? Let me tell you that respecting women and gender equality extends to more heights and places than just your home. I don't know how you treat your wife, but just loving her is not equal to respecting her. Giving her to make decisions. Letting her handle things in her own too. Which in the first place shouldn't be 'letting her' because she's her own person and can make her own choices. Previous from what you said - men should take leads and women should obey them - you call that equality?? It's gender roles. You're dividing and creating roles for gender to follow.
Hello from Australia! I have many Punjabi friends and I think India looks like a great country. Personally I do not like feminism at all, would you like to talk about feminism with an open mind? I'm willing to change my mind, and if your willing to change yours then I would love to have a conversation
I have honestly never heard someone excusing grown men committing crimes by saying "men will be men". The saying is "boys will be boys" and is used to brush off stupid, harmless stuff a kid would do. Some feminists took that and perverted it in their sick, psychopathic minds until it became this ridiculous idea that people are excusing horrible crimes committed by men.
@@therainbowconnection6813 in her mind you're a sexist or you're an idiot, it's better to meet these people on there level before reasoning with them, remember feminism is a largely emotionally driven movement. Logic and rationally has little to do with there beliefs, and you can't reason someone out of something they didn't reason themselves into
@@water7845 if you didn't live under the earth water you'd know that feminists do fight for men who are raped by women too please go read some news and please come out of all that dirt man It really pains me to see dumb people like you to be laughed at
@@therainbowconnection6813 well you were right till the part that says people dismiss the "men will be men and boys will be boys behaviour" but you see we never made eating banana a sexual symbol, we never made bending down from the waist to pick up something you people with that dammed perverted and sick ideology made that, we simply grew fed up with it and started to defend OURSELVES AND THE ONES OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER WHO GET TREATED THE SAME WAY so please go see a therapist
Equal rights/opportunities is what matters. Everyone should be given equal opportunities. You get what you do with that opportunity. If you effectively use it, you get what you deserve. Just don't deny the opportunity for someone if they truly deserve it. Also, whatever the result maybe you should take responsibility and not blame others if you have failure.
Why should there be equal opportunitys? Thats like a new religion to most of the world right now. If I think about the police or military i want strong men. Why should a women be given this opportunity when i can have only tall men?
@@dr.livesey7595 giving opportunity doesn't necessarily mean they are qualified. Only take that opportunity if they feel qualified. why go for a useless attempt.
Before dating a Korean men, don't forget to ask about their thoughts on feminism. They'll go on with the same "Korean version of feminism is madness..." etc. But what they'll also say is they do not believe in feminism altogether. They don't think women are discriminated in promotion opportunities. They don't believe men are paid higher wages for the exact same job. They don't believe women spend way more time doing house chores than their husbands.
I always ask men about my political views.. Feminism, religion views, etc etc... I have never encountered a man who actually understand what feminism is.
Feminists are 'useful idiots' in the not so secret communists' ambition to destroy the family unit. Women working at home are not serving the aims of the collectivist state.
@@shyofshyness Women are still discriminated against more than men. The only legitimate point MRAs have is the military service, but that has nothing to do with feminism. Their patriarchal government came up with that.
If Men get paid More than Women "For the same job", ¿Why will it be people bother to Hire Men when Women are "Cheaper and equally efficient"?. Arrogant and Ignorant people like Feminists are the worst.
1. 성범죄 재판에서, 무죄추정의 원칙은 왜 무너져야 하는가? 명확한 증거 없는 성범죄는 무죄여야 하지 않은가? 밝히기 힘들며, 피해자가 고통스러워하는 모든 문제는 유죄추정의 원칙을 적용해야 하는가? 2. 한국에서, 남성 경찰과 여성 경찰의 체력기준의 차이는 왜 존재하는가? 여성 경찰에게 낮은 체력기준을 요구하는 것이 오히려 역차별적인 것 아닌가? 왜 한국의 페미니즘은 이러한 역차별에는 침묵하는가? 이익이 되기 때문에 차별에 침묵하는 것인가? 아니면 이러한 경우에만 다름을 인정하고 존중해야 하는것인가? 3. 모든 집단이 동일한 임금을 받는것이 가능한가? 남성과 여성 - 성별의 차이 흑인,황인,백인 - 인종의 차이 이민자와 원주민 - 이민 여부의 차이 20대와 50대 - 연령별 차이 이들 집단 사이에 평균 임금이 다른 경우는 너무나도 많다. 이것들은 모두 차별인것인가? 각각의 모든 구별된 집단이 동일한 소득을 획득한다는 것이야말로 이상론이 아닌가? 4. 한국의 페미니스트들은 '여성은 징병 복무를 하기에 부적합 하다' 는 최고재판소의 판결에, 왜 그들은 적극적으로 항의하지 않는가? 여성 차별적 생각을 가진 최고재판소가 여성 징병제를 반대했다. 최고재판소(헌법재판소)는 신체적 차이를 이유로 여성이 남성보다 군 복무에 부적합하다고 주장했다.
As much as he opposes the so-called "Korean radical feminism", has he ever wondered why feminism is observed in Korea? Isn't it because of the rampant misogyny in the Confucian patriarchy as evidenced by incidents like the "Nth Room" case? Sir, think about that.
Didn’t Asian Boss tried to bring in Radical Feminists to share their viewpoint and they didn’t come. They had an opportunity to share with him their point of view and they didn’t. So I really don’t think he has to ´wonder’.
Why is the existence of patriarchy in the 21st century so demanded of young men in the 21st century? And why are you pretending not to know about the female version of Room N...?
Do you think there are a lot of women in their 20s, 30s, 40s who are currently patriarchal to Korean women? And wouldn't the direct damage be women in their 50s, 60s, and 70s? Wouldn't it be the right way to give them adequate protection and compensation?
You think that it is natural for young Korean men in their 20s to go to the military, but why do you not take issue with the fact that there is no compensation for the two-year deprivation period after being discharged from the military?
Men in Korea are NOT being discriminated against. I was assaulted and raped there, and witnessed others being assaulted and heard many stories from other victims. There is a serious problem there, and radical feminism is the result of silencing, not being heard and blaming victims. Men like this guy feel attacked cause they’re suddenly called out for their ways. “Man up” I would say following his beliefs.
You're so right when you say "no" is like you just castrated them. Not all are like this, but a very large population here are. I'm so sorry to hear about your assault. I hope better days have come to you🙏🏾♥️
Stfu men all over the world is discriminated Men are falsely accused of rape sexual assault For domestic violence as well Stop your sexists movement called feminism aka misandry
He was convincing until he said women need to be obedient to men and men need to sacrifice for women. I would think harmony should be different than that.
It took him a while to get to that lol. The thing is, people don't like to be subservient to others. it doesn't matter which way you turn it. We all want to be free to make our own choices and decisions.
You don't know his side of the story. Women are as abusive as men in any relationship.. pointing the mistake only on a man is the most misadnric thing you can say.
That man is a man who makes money out of hate. I'm a Korean man, but I don't support him. There are many people who make money by promoting such disgust in Korea. a social problem
Now that the South Korean streamer BJ Jammi killed herself because of a 3-year-long cyberbullying campaign led by anti-feminists, what do you guys got to say?
i remember seeing this guy on a episode on hello counselor a korean tv show he was there for being super narcissist making peoples lives difficult or something like that
This guy is speaking in very general terms and keeps assuming 'equal' means 'the same'. It is not what is means. He seems to also lack empathy towards crimes against women committed to a high degree in S. Korea in recent years. There might be rage in women and it's a problem but it didn't just appear out of nowhere. Maybe if they focused on calling each other's misogyny more as well as women's misandry - it would all make a bit more sense.
An extreme feminist like you sees a small number of sex offenders and defines all men as potential sex offenders. You have to realize that this is very wrong.
Korea is the safest country for women in the world. Still, more women feel threatened by sex crimes than in Russia. In fact, the rate of sexual assault by women per capita is the lowest in the world. The media is crazy. This is a big problem. Already we are doing our best.
he said the first is to admit difference tho. I agree about the crimes, he seems more interested in policies. "Maybe if they focused on calling each other's misogyny more as well as women's misandry" I think he's exactly doing that
South Korea is among the safest places on Earth there is no high degree of any criminal action. That is not to say people not are victimised but honestly the bigoted fashion some South Korean women represent facts. Is entirely without justification and based purely on hate.
Imagine if a woman did the same in his rallies , I wonder what his reaction would be....full 40 min of him beating around the bush with not even a single serious issue faced by women addressed . Rape , sexual assault , domestic violence , unequal opportunities ? I wish there was more of that....
Interviewer should ask better questions than Lol you think sexual assault rape and domestic violence is a problem? Try going to jail for those problems when a woman reports you for personal enimity And yes in many places there are unequal opportunities like women get selected for the job for being women
@@rifatislam5836 Are you living under a rock ?? Do you really think rape and domestic violence is not a problem ?? Kindly stfu . Seriously !! How ignorant one has to be to make such a statement . You are invalidating the experience of thousands of people who've gone though these. Also , pls refrain from doing whataboutery here bcoz that doesn't improve anything but takes away the limelight from issue being highlighted .
Sexual crimes are definitely a serious problem. However it is not a problem caused by women hate. It is a problem caused by human to human. It is not a gender problem. However feminists use every issue and make it a gender issue. If they fall of a bike they will argue they fell because they are a women. Plus unequal opportunities? There is no such thing espacially in korea. There is no wage gap, only men goes to mandatory military training for two years while women study, jobs legally have to hire women for some degree even if they lack skill.
Honestly I think it's important to know what this organization's mindset is , because information is power and the more you know you are able to see more clearly what's going on around you and where you stand in society.
I think the organization's mindset can be inferred quite well from this interview. The feminism they are combating is the kind that promotes female chauvinism rather than gender harmony.
@@wiltmarlonelao that’s exactly what i was thinking when i first watched this. there are no doubt more feminist groups that promote solidarity than groups that do not. peculiar to focus on one that doesn’t.
@@ConstantinKlose-sj4mb what i find so crazy is that many of their talking points resemble 50s western misogyny, the overstatement of biological differences, the misleading stories, the persecution complex, but most importantly, the refusal to address the elephant in the room, i think most men are willing to listen to Korean men because they undoubtedly have it rough bc of the mandatory military service, but Korea is also widely known for its spycam and abuse problem and anti-feminists went viral but getting triggered over an emoji. Going back to the video, i think if anyone lives under a rock it’d be easy to be persuaded by this rather well spoken guy and the lack of perspective, i don’t buy that AB couldn’t bring perspective themselves, they could’ve, they didn’t need feminists to do it for them but oh well, let’s see how this goes.
@@biomutant1468 I think you still don't understand. Their logic is more disastrous than they think. For your information, I understand that you said 200,000 in another comment is less than 20,000. The problem is that reporters in Korea, which just mass-produced and created fake news, and the feminist who gave it an excuse. It's not even a hidden camera prank, it's a determined crime. For your information, I'm not trying to omo. For reference, in Korea, a law was made to prevent it, but only Korean companies, except where and where the incident occurred, became the scope of the crackdown. I really don't know... Let's see if this is right.
@@ConstantinKlose-sj4mb exactly what I said! My respect for Asian Boss is on the balance. And all the hateful comments is so gross. They claim there are no internet abuse toward women as they spout abuse.
In this divisive world, I’m so glad Asian Boss has the guts to interview the other side. Most mainstream media will just brush this off. True journalism doesn’t pick side and let people form their own opinion. I’m a woman and I don’t stand by the interviewee’s views, but it’s very important to hear counter arguments, even if you strongly disagree with them.
@@jamesluccin4553 That fella probably thinks that the interviewee is suggesting that women should be barred from certain roles that men are biologically better at, like physically-demanding work such as being a fire fighter, because some of these "wokeist" people cannot concieve the fact that men and women are not biologically equal, therefore the interviewee must be suggesting sexist policy. This is very much American wokeist culture that cannot comprehend nuance, and can only see things in binary terms. Which I note is hilariously ironic, seeing that the same culture advocates for non-binaries.
It's only about competences. The person's gender doesn't matter, what matters is if he or she is qualified for the job. So you just gotta test every single person who is applying for a job individually to find out whether they are qualified for the job or not. Period.
I could tell you were a man from your comment alone. You have zero conscience of the women opression if you think it's just that easy. Women won't reach position of power if they're not given the right education. Women won't reach position of power if they're not socialize to to have ambition. Women won't reach position of power if the whole of society expects them to bare the weight of being the caregiver in every situation (family and other). Women won't reach position of power if they're constantly confronted with stereotypes about their gender. And for endless other reasons, its not "only about competences". You are oblivious to the reality of white patriarchy.
@@sarahno7223 In my opinion, you are wrong on several levels: 1. Concerning education, boys and girls are equally educated in the western world, in my home country even more women statistically get a good A levels result and study at universites than men. There are no laws that exclude women from certain contents regarding education, so women have the same opportunities and chances to have a successful career as men do. 2. It's true that it's still more expected from women to take care of the kids than from men; however, no one forces you to have children, so that's not an obstacle in your way if you want to make a career. IF you decide to have children, that's your choice and you obviously have the responsibility to take care of them, but I agree that the responsibility should be split up more equally between the father and the mother. 3. Men are just as affected by stereotypical expectations regarding their gender as women are, they are just different. Being expected to not show feelings, always be the strong and tough guy, that a muscular body is a "must" and that dads are less important than mums are just some of those. Men are equally burdened by that than women are with their expectations. You talking about "white patriarchy" proves that you are a US American citizen. The idea that people who happen to be male and of European heritage are intentionally oppressing every other group of people to stay at the top is quite ridiculous, to put it mildly. I'm from a European country and in contrast to the US, we do not have those problems of a "white supremacy" here. And one last tip: if you REALLY care about women's rights and gender equality, you should campaign for helping women who are really oppressed in their home countries by law AND by culture, like so many Middle Eastern countries with Arabian and Muslim influence. The situation of women there is not comparable with yours as a globally privileged woman living in a first world country. Those women need your help way more than Western women. But that would REALLY require you to see further than the end of your nose, and, let's be honest, that is quite unlikely in your case, considering the fact that you rant so intensively about the oppression of women in first world countries...
@@davidkoslowski2697 right. I won't even bother contradicting you as it is clear you choose to ignore the reality in which occidental countries live, their responsability in the precarious state off said woman in the middle east, aswell as your own privilige as a man. My experience as woman doesn't stand before your imparable knowledge :) I can so tell you've been through so much to reach such a higher level of comprehension of the non existence of discrimination of any form in Europe. May you share it with many more sir, it is highly valuable ;)
@@sarahno7223 Okay. If you are still interested in continuing this conversation: No, I never said that there is no discrimination in any form in Europe. Don't twist my words. You keep mentioning those topics (the reality in occidental countries, OUR responsibility towards suppressed women in the middle East and male privilege), so much that I'm really interested in you actually explaining what you mean by that. Everyone can throw in random keywords, but can you explain them? I'm open to hear/learn something new ;)
@@cocokoochie9648 But why is there a word "femina" in that name that means women? Do women mean gender equality? Do men mean gender discrimination? Shouldn't we use neutral words instead of 'femina'?
@@울릉캠퍼스 let me point out similar words to you. MANkind, sportsMANship, huMANity, huMAN. according to your logic, does the following words exclude women? if it helps expand your knowledge, the word femina in feminism makes the most sense since this term started as equal right for women since they were denied the right to be a human being. and still are.
Let each platform/gate/job requirement/expectation be standardized. No two way for anyone. Whoever passes the test (physical or mental), men, women or otherwise deserve to enter. Let no one be judged on who they identify as.
In fact, black people have been discriminated against like women. They should continue to be equal without discrimination. But if the government discriminates and represses white people under the name "black lives matter," do you agree with that? Feminism in Korea is the same as the example above.
@@Ciaraphyzzle Black people are just examples. But seeing you say that, I'm sure I've got a very good example. You say my argument is poor, but enough evidence for my argument is in the video. Don't just write comments and watch the video.
"They were lying and saying that men were following/harassing them for youtube clout and money...so I decided to dress as The Joker and follow them." Yo...
he dresses as the joker to be entertaining (said in the video) and he did. And by "Following" he did not stalk them just went there to the gathering (think of it like following in social media). You guys have to understandyou can't take subtitles literally, hearing the message itself in it's native language also the difference in culture must be taken in consideration.
@@Fruitystyleangel I mean, you can counter protest a protest. The context was that after the fact it was reported that men physically and verbally assulted the feminist gathering - clearly in video he just walks along and shoots the water in the air, not sure if what he said at that moment counts as verbal assault. I was correcting the original comment as the subtitles made it seem like the reporting and events were switched.
Everything is to be respected until someone proposes for another person to be subservient to another person. Once you infringe on somebody else's authority over themselves you are attempting over their dignity and human rights. If a woman makes a choice to listen to you fine, but are you proposing all women to obligatorily do what you theorize? What if most women's idea of freedom, happiness and team work is not that, then what?
@@yogachick1955 Agree. In my comment i was actually referring to the man being interviewed, i just realized it wasn't clear who i was writing to and about haha.
I lean more conservative, and i thought the same thing. there shouldn't be a universal rule that women should obey men. it's a choice. Personally i love to "submit" to my man (because he is trustworthy and a man of character), but imposing that general rule unto society can be dangerous.
I too initially felt that there was something wrong with the analogy of one gender needing to be subservient while the other sacrifices. Yet, as he expounded on that point, I believe what he's simply trying to say is that we should learn to respect and give way to one another. Ideally speaking, we ought to obey those who are more capable in a certain field, and sacrifice for those who are less capable, regardless of gender. He's simply pointing out the beauty in this kind of interaction where we accept our flaws and give control to the one who can best handle the situation.
Women should be treated with respect. I support equality for women. Women should be free from abuse, hatred and inequality. Women and men should never be bullied. Women can be leaders and great thinkers. Women deserve the vote. Women can lead countries.
The issue with the modern movement is many call themselves misandr*sts. That isn’t equality, that’s wanting superiority especially if many are using that label.
of course, I agree on every list of yours. but most feminist in South korea hate on LGBTQ+ and very very radical. and the most important point is that more than 80% of women piggyback on the radical feminist and very very disregard on equal rights.
11:35 “Woman should be obedient” and “men should sacrifice” ummm…. You do know a woman is not a dog right, why is the woman portrayed as a weak “childlike” creature but the guy is portrayed as “a hero” for sacrificing himself? He also says that a lot of radical feminists hate men. Statistically speaking most sexual offenders are men and feminist say things like “men are trash” and then some people will say “not all men”, so I ask you, if you were to jump in a pool with 10 sharks but 6 sharks will kill you, are you still gonna say “not all sharks” or are you going to jump in the pool and take a swim?
exactly. i’ve noticed most anti feminists are men. it’s not surprising at all because they grew up as men and will never know what it’s like to be a woman. it’s horrifying being a woman. the amount of women sex trafficked and murdered every year is insane. and not enough people are talking about this.
@elle min Women get paid an equal wage for equal job and equal productivity. If someone works 40 hours a week and someone works 30 hours a week in the same job, the 40 hours will have a higher income for the year. Studies show that men work longer hours, so it makes sense they would have higher incomes in the same job.
@elle min civil services and other exams 2 years extra preparation. Imagine wasting 2 years of life and competing with people with 2 years more experience in job market
As a woman, i understand why some men agree with this dude. he firstly knows how to make men look like poor sheeps and radical feminists like bad people. Im honestly not a supporter of radical feminism but have these men ever asked themselves why do women even started these movements? i feel like they didn't dig in enough and that's why this men's movement was created and also that's why I started disagreeing with him 5 minutes after the interview started. He doesn't even know the difference between gender and sex. He doesn't know the difference between what's science and what's society norms. Before starting this movement he should've studied feminism and why it even exists. Actually, if he was smart enough he would've understood that we live in a radicated patriarchal society...but truth is that this society is actually comfortable for him to live in because he's in a position of privilege and doesn't want it to change. Women with power scare men a lot.
In my opinion, women's rights always think that men's rights are bad people, and they are good people and saviors, so whenever men call for their rights, women's rights will jump out and guide men to show their superiority, so you and you Despised people make no difference.
If you just listen to what a person says instead of watching what she does, I think you should trust the Communist Party, because what they say is prettier than anyone else.
@@minitetourou8744 in my opinion why do mens rights movements should exist if they already have more rights than anyone else ?? also the comment abt communism...😂 didn't understand much tbh but karl marx was actually a great man👍🏾 i agree with him
@@cosmiclulu Oh, it is the fact that the interests of men are always ignored and the rights and responsibilities of women's rights are not equal to create men's rights. My fault, I should say, what you should believe is the Chinese Communist Party and the Korean Communist Party.
@@minitetourou8744 LMAOOOOO i mean I'm a socialist but do not support China's gov neither NK's gov but whatever you say 😂 also in which way men's interests are always ignored? and if so, why do you think they are ignored? because of patriarchy 😭, let's make an example: mental health and reproductive system issues within men: there's little awareness because a real man (according to standards who were set by men themselves) shouldn't feel emotions, shouldn't cry, shouldn't show vulnerability. When it comes to reproductive system health there's a big stigma around infertility, where if a man is infertile, well, he's not a real man. All of this to say that if you men want to change something within your "comunity" y'all should start from yourselves 😭 while for women it's completely different because other than society standards we are literally fighting for our RIGHTS, it's a social, economic, and political issue, whether you like it or not, that's the truth and if you don't see the problem then you're part of the problem 😉 like...some men rather stay ill than make a doctor put their finger up their ass because they scared it makes them gay 😭
self care is a bad thing so don't wear make up. "it's like they're turning their laziness into a righteous message to the public" bruh, wearing make up ain't self care, most men and even women don't wear it, it don't mean they got no self care. sadly shows his double standard, that's a big oof
if you flip that, you have to flip other things, and then stuff about the story makes less sense given the gender roles of the day. As for why the man dies and not the woman in a general sense - I don't know, as there are other romance-tragedy films where the woman dies instead. At the end of the day, Cameron wanted the main character to be a woman, so Jack dies since he is not the main character. if it were actually a trope in those kinds of films, then sure, you could the film as an example, but there isnt really a trope concerning the genders for that type of story AFAIK.
hey asianboss, a sk youtuber woman named Jammi has ended her life because she was accused of being a feminist by another youtuber, a man. how okay it is to keep pushing the insane and malicious narrative of "being a feminist is way too radical" in sk? women are harrased and targeted bc they fight for the dignity and equal rights they deserve and this interview is still up. there are no worlds to describe how disgusted I am this you even considered this man worth having a voice. it is blatant your absolute disrespect towards the situation of not only women in sk but also around the world.
I went from liking this comment to disliking it. Even if you disagree it’s their job as journalists to show various viewpoints without any bias or censorship. If you want to solve the issue it’s important to listen to the other side’s perspective instead of just silencing them and building more resentment.
wearing make up is self care? i'm allergic to most products and break out with contact dermatitis if i wear make up often. for me, that is self care not laziness. he should review this part of what he says for himself and be more generous toward situations he's not familiar with. as long as something does not play a part in how well someone performs their duties, it should be overlooked.
I'm the same as you, I have really sensitive skin and I'm allergic to a lot of things so I just don't bother wearing it lol Even some moisturizers make me break out in hives like UGH
Make-up isn't self-love. It was created so we look acceptable to the male gaze. Man-made us used to look appealing to their eyes. Especially in SK go to work without makeup, made you look like you have less value. Its sad but, make is art and should be use because we want to used, not because someone brainwashing us that putting will make man want us
I've never seen a guy being discriminated as a result of "radical feminism" in a systematic way but I've seen a lot of discrimination against women worldwide just because people bring up "radical" feminism whenever feminists bring up an issue they need to resolve
Are you serious? or are you acting dumb? Look up jail sentence men vs woman.. do women get punishments for false sexual assault accustations when men lives can be ruined? It's a slap on the wrist. If a man accuses another man of a crime its called libel a prison sentence at a minimum. Women in the West are so coddled with a soft form of patriarchy you actually think you're equal to men. You signed up for the draft yet, and don't hit with the stupid trite non-sequitor of no one should be drafted because Ukraine should've show you how Nature works... there is no feminism anymore.. at all. Women are given equal consequences for their terrible behavior. You're just coddled more and given more priviledges than the previous generation of women while men go through the same bs except the top 10-20% of men giggling they get access to women with less responsibilities to have sex with/financial support them.
As a s korean woman, I don’t think most of the feminists here are ‘extreme feminists’. a lot of women have balanced ideas on this matter. (meaning they think both men and women are experiencing discrimination in their areas) in fact, I never encountered a misandrist in real life. ‘feminism’ is reduced to ‘extreme feminism’ here. when women say something to defend themselves, then she’s considered an extreme feminist. so most of us who have moderate and balanced view on gender issues avoid calling themselves feminists. that’s why it seems like there’s only extreme feminists. I was surprised when my mom talked about feminism as if it were something evil.
Could you provide some examples on the most controversial topics and potentially links to further understand the feminism situation in S. Korea? Thank you.
any evidence for this? It could have just been a strategic move by his ex-wife. The Silver Bullet False Allegation: A false allegation made with the intention of causing harm or winning a case. The term “silver bullet” refers to the idea that one false allegation can be used to win a case or gain an advantage.
@@zzz1test1zzz That person has already been fined and determined guilty. You can search that on probably most of korean media using a sentence “안정권 동맹 유튜버 배인규, 아내폭행 해명도 거짓으로 드러나”. It can be roughly translate into “An ally RU-vidr of An-Junggueon, Bae-Inkyu faced revelations that his explanation for spousal abuse was also exposed as false”
Wearing makeup or wearing comfortable clothes or cutting your hair short.... These are not all there's to self care. And doing these things doesn't make you lazy.... This man sounds so dumb calling it laziness like WHAT!?
He had me at gender harmony/equity but lost me at the titanic example. There’s a difference between general sex qualities (physical, emotional, etc) versus social gender norms. I found myself agreeing with him then disagreeing.
The thing is, as hard as it is to understand, in general, social gender norms are derived from sex qualities or to be more exact from the biological side. For example, is expected for a woman to stay with her baby after birth and to be a nurture, because she and the baby have a psychological, emotional, physical and hormonal bound that the man doesn't have with the baby. Is expected that the man goes to work and brings the food to the table, cause psychologically he has a hunting nature, to protect and provide for his family. Like this, there are many gender rules that people think are just "social construct", but their not, there's a reason and a meaning behind human behavior, it's not all about culture, prejudices and stereotypes, the biological part is very deep and rooted inside people's nature.
@@yamiletsoler3464 Agree. But many technological advances have led many societal changes and even let people overcome biological, innate differences. Mr. Bae has many good points about radical feminist movements in Korea now. I agree with him, but he lost me with a story of Titanic. Gender Harmony sounds really nice and idealistic, but, for me, like he mentioned, we have to find the root causes of this radical feminist movement. What has caused this? How this has been intensified, and why? For me, underlying this radical movement, there are technological advances along with education. Technological advances have freed many people from labor work itself and education has let people think critically - let people doubt the status quo. We also need to acknowledge that from the very beginning people have refused to be "status quo" - and that is exactly why people have constantly created something and accelerated technological advances and societal changes.
That was what I exactly experienced while watching this clip. He has made really many good points I totally agree, but I'm afraid that he hasn't gotten the concept of "equity" right. For me, either he seems to misunderstand the concept or refuse to understand it right. Lastly I wish he could have come up with a better term rather than "Gender Harmony" which sounds a bit too idealistic and vague.
Here is my repost from a earlier comment. I hope I can convince you to change your mind if possible. "Looking at some of the comments and unsurprisingly even a few with a large number of thumbs up. You can clearly see how feminism has made people stupid, naive, and willfully ignorant. A lot of the attacks are very general bland attacks that contain no substance that somehow never pinpoint what exactly the guy says wrong. There are also comments that seem to discredit him because he dressed up in certain costumes. EVEN THOUGH he clearly explains why he does that in the interview. Then there are also comments that warp the truth and quote only a portion of what the man says. When the guy mentioned obedience and sacrifice between a man and woman using titanic as an example, the interviewer asked what if the roles were reversed. The man clearly says reversing roles would still be the same, then goes on to give a personal example from his life. Talking about how much his wife suffered and sacrificed when his business failed and how much support he got from his wife. Which did nothing but help revitalize his devotion, love and faith to his wife, true obedience. Feminism has gone from something genuine and righteous, into this man hating women elitism movement, pure misandry. You can scour the comments and see for yourself what feminism has become. Willful and deliberate ignorance, out of pure spite and hatred. Cutting quotes short to fit "their" narrative, never willing to open up their hearts and minds to actually listen to the opposing side. It has become a illness and disease, a mental sickness. Everyone here knows the truth why no feminist representatives came out for the interview. Its because they know deep inside they are wrong and don't want to be crucified in public. Saying they didn't appear due to harassment or attacks is pure excuses, everyone here knows this is a pre-recorded youtube video. Voice warping and mosaics can be done easily. Everyone who can think for themselves know the obvious. The only reason they didn't appear is because they have no confidence in their movement and beliefs. They have no confidence in their actions and don't want to take responsibility for them. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a "brigade" of feminists (shoot if we go the conspiracy route, this could all be a charade done by a 3rd party to create a divide and dissent among the people by parties of interest) whose jobs are to make such dumbs comments to change and warp the publics opinion through deception and taking advantage of peoples short attention spans, or their laziness. Reminds me of what people call the pro-communist chinese spammers. The 50c army. Same difference. Too lazy to watch a 40min video from start to finish but have all the qualifications and judgements to ridicule the man and upvote comments that make you "feel good" or aligns with your ideals/beliefs without listening to the guy? How is that a logical conversation. Its just screaming your ideals at the top of your lungs while you cover your ears. This is the type of people we are trying to have a conversation with, like talking to a wall. No logic, no sense, only hatred. I'm not a anti-feminist nor involved with anything of that category be it on the internet/politically or other. I just see a bunch of people hating on the guy and as someone who watched the video. I do not understand at all what he has said wrong. Seriously everything he has said has been logical, no excuses, no cheap shots, comments made on a base of neutral and mutual respect. Even his wife is there to support him while she is behind the camera. Am I the crazy one? Or has everyone else gone crazy? These are some confusing times we live in. Word of advice, take every comment you see be it reddit or youtube or any social platform with caution and wariness. Much like you guys have heard about fake and/or biased news. The internet, forums and social platforms have also become a battleground of propaganda. Don't think that every comment you see is from an actual individual and always give a thought that there could be a possibility that forces in the background are doing social engineering to change and warp public opinions. Yes, that includes my wall of text as well. Judge it as you will, but make sure its a judgement based on actual self-critical thinking and logic. Not based on emotions, feelings and predisposed prejudice."
The main problem is that radical feminists want a 50% women quota in parliament which puts mediocre women into power and make bias decisions (as they cannot win elections on their own), how does that benefits society and economy?
By self-care he probably meant "making yourself presentable" to......(now don't get your panties twisted)...to people in general, not just men. I do "self-care" every time I step out for something important as a man.
The problem with alot people are, they counter misandrist ideology with misogynist ideology and vice versa, misogynistic attitude is countered by misandrist attitude And most people think that these are right and are justified just because "All Men/All Women" are like that and are "always" doing "too much" harm.
People who think in black and white tend to make illogical claims like that because they generalise and think every person belonging to a particular group are the same
if your purpose as a men's rights activits is to fight against women's right and not men's right talking about how society made men feel like, they can't talk about thir feelings, emotions and have to be strong, not cry, or ask for help then you are not a men's right but anti women's rights. Get it right.
1. parking lot marked with a female-only mark 2. Women-only bicycle parking lot 3. Jecheon Women's Library 4.Women's restroom (TV + sofa) 340 million won 5. Quotation system for women-only professions 6. Additional points for women only when employed in public institutions. 7. Women-only start-up support 8. Women-only business support 9. Women-only Practical Test (Public Official) Points are given preferentially to women 10. Women-only rental housing 11. Life support system exclusively for prostitutes 12. Women-only trial (lower trial results or weak mental and physical strength) 13. Women-only subway car - Exists in Busan 14. Ladies-only lounge 15. Women-only stairs 16. Women-only street (not implemented due to severe backlash) 17. Women-only library 18. Female-only school dormitory (existing male and female dormitories exist. Female-only facilities are extended. After that, only female dormitories are allocated additionally -> Reverse discrimination 19. Female-only apartment 20. Women-only smoking room 21. Elevator for women only 22. A woman-friendly city 23. Women-only sleeping room - Existing male and female facilities available, additional expansion 24. State-funded support for women-only support 25. Women's Employment Fair Only women can participate in the fair 26.Guri Fire Station female-only rest area - No resting area for male firefighters. 27.Women's Hall (National Women-Only Facility) 28. Women-only powder room 29. Women's Employment Support Center 30. Women's Safety Emergency Bell 31. Women’s Safe Convenience Store 32. Women’s safe way home 33. Women's Caring Room 34. Women's safe delivery box 35. Women only college 36. Women-only national institution - Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. There are only two institutions in the world 37. Quota system for women 38. Women-only taxi 39. Loan service for women only 40. Female-only Gositel 41. Women only bar 42. Women only share house 43. Female-only guesthouse 44. Public facilities for anarchy feminism 45. Women-only spa 46. Women-only campsite 47. Women-only sidewalk block 48. Women-only library 1st reading room, 2nd reading room... 49. Female-only apartment health club 50. Women-only hospital 51. Violence against Women Act - Cases: In foreign countries, the accusation rate has risen to 90% 52. Female shower room - No male shower facilities 53. Women-only restaurant 54. Women-only network club 55. One-room for women only 56.4 Years old college women’s quota bonus system 57. Women-only shower room at Geomcheon Service Area 58. Karaoke room for women only 59. Women-only parking lot in Bucheon 60. Women-only head coach 61. Women-only discount 62. Jamsil Women Only 70% discount rate 63. Female-only customer center store phone 64. Women-only card and discount system for women 65. Rather than oppressing only women, this woman’s exclusive view 66. Women-only interior discount in Sejong City 67. ECO discount plan for women only 68. Female only caress room - ???? 69. Women-only guarantee product 70. Hell-in for women only 71. Up to 80% discount on women-only fares 72. Credit card women-only discount 73. Hongdae Women's Guard Center 74. Sex discount system 75. All-in-one discount system for professional education centers 76. Women-only agency 77. Provided a women-only swimming class at the National Youth Training Center 78. Women-only products 79. Women-only hotel discount 80. Jamsil Women’s Center 81. Incheon Women's Prostitute Support Center Service - 20 million won 82. Women-only blockchain 83. Ilsan KINTEX and exclusive bus seats 84.Yeocam Library Women’s Reading Room 85. Men's restroom for women only - Men's restroom when the women's restroom is available at maximum 86.LCC exquisite superb view
@@jasonsmith8500 The crazy people who make these laws are men in their 50s and 60s who like women too much, and women in the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family
@@jasonsmith8500 After all, the age group that suffers the most are men in their 20s and 30s. We are currently fighting this injustice reality. However, the opposing force, feminists, continues to frame men as potential perpetrators
He had a few good points especially with acknowledging each other differences and use each other strenghts to get the best outcome. His statement however that "a woman should be obedient to a man" really didn't make sense to me though. This might worked well when we were living in a more primitive setting with less people and where psychical strenght was more valuable. But In our todays society this "rule" seems too outdated and I can't see how it would give us any advantages.
Yeah the rule itself is definitely outdated, but I'd also say his way of explaining it as well as mentioning the roles can be reversed for genders is still a lot better than most countries that abide by that mindset
I find that women prefer to "obey" (or top from the bottom, as I like to call it). Especially during the courting period and sex. Women don't want to pay, and they want the man to carry the relationship... Is that equity? No. Why do women pretend to want equality?
@@shin-ishikiri-no You know it's more to life than sex and a relationship. This is your second comment I've seen so far. A woman must have treated you this way for you to act like this. You're using that experience or those few experiences to go against all women. Let it go or date and surround yourself with men.
@@kennedya7848 do you know there are increasing number of people dress up as Joker and pull off stunt. To answer your question, I know this guy do it for get public attention, BUT it can't excuse the facts there are many edgelord did same thing.
Sorry, but I couldn’t watch this until the end. I had to stop watching after hearing him say that he doesn‘t see the need for more female representation in politics. He does not see and understand the systemic and deeply-entrenched inequalities towards female. Meritocracy isn‘t always based on merit. A good case in point is the news from Japan about how women who took the exams to get into medical school were systematically and unfairly excluded even though they performed just as well or even better than their male counterparts. Women don‘t have the same starting point as men. That is what feminist are trying to change - that women start on equal footing with men. I don‘t consider myself a feminist but am already angry at the way this man talks about women…
I hope Japan & South Korea never let porn proliferate society like it has in the West. I live in the US & I hate how porn has destroyed so much decency. I respect how Japan & South Korea have much tighter laws regarding the production of such filth
"I believe women should be obedient to men, and men should sacrifice themselves for women." Or, idk, maybe let people do whatever they feel like and whatever they're good at? Then we could base things on individual talent and merit, instead of broad gender roles and gendered responsibilities.
I didn't watch the whole video, but he's not a real Men's Rights Activist if he thinks like that. Men don't owe protection to women. In fact, that thought goes against the very foundation of MRA. MRA is about giving men the choice, even if that choice is to put their own safety before a woman's.
He didn't say that women should be "obedient" to men. He said that both the genders should RESPECT each other. That thing got lost in the Korean to English translation
Its an interesting interview but it lacked more questions for the interviewer to ask and didn't address any hard hitting concrete questions for us to know. like in detail, what has he done about these supposed issues other than talking and dressing up like a clown for views. What has he done to show that he is trying to help and not hinder serious issues like this?
Asking open questions as an interviewr and letting the other person talk so that people watching can make their own mind up about him and his responses is something that is admirable. And quite lacking these days
대한민국에는 가짜뉴스를 이용한 선동이 많았습니다. 페미니즘의 잘못된 행동을 좋게 포장하여 뉴스기사에서 다루고, 페미니스트들은 서로 링크를 공유하여 좋아요를 누르고 동의하는 댓글을 달았습니다. 일반 사람들중 일부는 다수의 동의를 옳음으로 착각하여 동조하기도 하였습니다. 페미니스트들은 조직적으로 선동을 한것이죠. 인터뷰를 해주신 신남성연대의 대표 배인규는 페미니스트에 반대하는 커뮤니티를 형성하여, 페미니스트들의 선동을 파악하고 미리 선점하여 위와 같은 일이 벌어지지 않도록 막고 있습니다. 논리적인 댓글을 통하 대중들에게 진실을 알렸으며, 현재에도 꾸준히 진행중입니다. 인터뷰에서는 나오지 않은 부분들이 많이 있습니다. 분장을 하고 페미니스트의 남성혐오적인 시위를 방해한 것 말고도, 겉으로 드러나는 모든 선동을 막아내고 있습니다. 페미니스트의 선동은 남성에게 불리하고 불평등한 분위기로 이어지게 됩니다. 심지어 법도 바뀝니다. 이외에 진리를 연구하고 피해남성을 돕는 일은 성평화연대가 해내고 있습니다. 남성연대와 성평화연대는 서로 다른 곳에서, 대한민국에 꼭 필요한 일들을 책임지고 있습니다.
This is a prime example of simple comments outright lying to decept the public to lazy to watch the full video... hand picked quotes to paint the guy in the wrong light. Here is my repost. "Looking at some of the comments and unsurprisingly even a few with a large number of thumbs up. You can clearly see how feminism has made people stupid, naive, and willfully ignorant. A lot of the attacks are very general bland attacks that contain no substance that somehow never pinpoint what exactly the guy says wrong. There are also comments that seem to discredit him because he dressed up in certain costumes. EVEN THOUGH he clearly explains why he does that in the interview. Then there are also comments that warp the truth and quote only a portion of what the man says. When the guy mentioned obedience and sacrifice between a man and woman using titanic as an example, the interviewer asked what if the roles were reversed. The man clearly says reversing roles would still be the same, then goes on to give a personal example from his life. Talking about how much his wife suffered and sacrificed when his business failed and how much support he got from his wife. Which did nothing but help revitalize his devotion, love and faith to his wife, true obedience. Feminism has gone from something genuine and righteous, into this man hating women elitism movement, pure misandry. You can scour the comments and see for yourself what feminism has become. Willful and deliberate ignorance, out of pure spite and hatred. Cutting quotes short to fit "their" narrative, never willing to open up their hearts and minds to actually listen to the opposing side. It has become a illness and disease, a mental sickness. Everyone here knows the truth why no feminist representatives came out for the interview. Its because they know deep inside they are wrong and don't want to be crucified in public. Saying they didn't appear due to harassment or attacks is pure excuses, everyone here knows this is a pre-recorded youtube video. Voice warping and mosaics can be done easily. Everyone who can think for themselves know the obvious. The only reason they didn't appear is because they have no confidence in their movement and beliefs. They have no confidence in their actions and don't want to take responsibility for them. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a "brigade" of feminists (shoot if we go the conspiracy route, this could all be a charade done by a 3rd party to create a divide and dissent among the people by parties of interest) whose jobs are to make such dumbs comments to change and warp the publics opinion through deception and taking advantage of peoples short attention spans, or their laziness. Reminds me of what people call the pro-communist chinese spammers. The 50c army. Same difference. Too lazy to watch a 40min video from start to finish but have all the qualifications and judgements to ridicule the man and upvote comments that make you "feel good" or aligns with your ideals/beliefs without listening to the guy? How is that a logical conversation. Its just screaming your ideals at the top of your lungs while you cover your ears. This is the type of people we are trying to have a conversation with, like talking to a wall. No logic, no sense, only hatred. I'm not a anti-feminist nor involved with anything of that category be it on the internet/politically or other. I just see a bunch of people hating on the guy and as someone who watched the video. I do not understand at all what he has said wrong. Seriously everything he has said has been logical, no excuses, no cheap shots, comments made on a base of neutral and mutual respect. Even his wife is there to support him while she is behind the camera. Am I the crazy one? Or has everyone else gone crazy? These are some confusing times we live in. Word of advice, take every comment you see be it reddit or youtube or any social platform with caution and wariness. Much like you guys have heard about fake and/or biased news. The internet, forums and social platforms have also become a battleground of propaganda. Don't think that every comment you see is from an actual individual and always give a thought that there could be a possibility that forces in the background are doing social engineering to change and warp public opinions. Yes, that includes my wall of text as well. Judge it as you will, but make sure its a judgement based on actual self-critical thinking and logic. Not based on emotions, feelings and predisposed prejudice."
The main problem is that radical feminists want a 50% women quota in parliament which puts mediocre women into power and make bias decisions (as they cannot win elections on their own), how does that benefits society and economy?
Classic feminist cherry picking the example. Here's a valid alternative you could have used based on his argument: Him: "we support true gender equality" Also him: "men should sacrifice for women" You see... you lack context and nuance - as all radical feminists do.
since when is makeup self-care and no makeup is laziness? this video is full of patriarchal assumptions that negatively affect both men and women and they don’t even get unpacked. just because he’s speaking in an even tone doesn’t mean the logic is sound. nice to hear him say all this crap tho.
Women don't wear makeup for themselves, they do it out of an effort to attract men. Where is the patriarchal assumption? Can you point out one from the video instead of blabbering nonsense here?
@@latte5946 english isnt my first language maybe I said it wrong. but how exactly? I dont wear makeup for anyone to like me if you do like me cause of it okay, thanks? If you dont idc wasnt the goal to begin with
@@Waterbug1591 Lots of lesbian and asexual women wear makeup, and I know lots of women who wear makeup to hang out with female friends, or when alone. Sometimes women wear it to attract men, but that's not always not overwhelmingly the case.
It's incredibly irresponsible to give someone a platform whose entire base is built on misogyny and hate, deceitfully disguised as "equality and harmony". The man who says he is all for equality, says less than 5 minutes later that he believes "all women need to be obedient to men". This guy is a hilariously delusional, it deeply upsets me that so many young, lost, frustrated Korean men eat it all up.
@Winter Wyvern Where does he say men should be obedient to women? Timestamp please. In regards to men having to sacrifice for women; there's a clear difference here in power and hierarchy here, framed in a way to make it seem like his cause is logical or noble. His crystal clear agenda is: women have no power and should obey, and women are at held at the mercy of their husband/boyfriend/father/brother's magnanimity or generosity. CLEARLY this isn't gender equality, but rather toxic, traditional forms of masculinity stemming from generations of misogyny and patriarchy.
@kodura vivasayi Firstly, see 11:19. He says exactly what I quoted: "women need to be obedient to men". Please find where he says "men can also be obedient", it's YOUR responsibility to back up your claims. Misandry is wrong, and fighting against it is a good thing. But I think it's abundantly clear the vast majority of feminists in Korea are NOT misandrists; rather enraged women sick to death of a system of cultural, societal and institutional oppression that has existed since before the dawn of modern society. With regards to conscription; I agree, I am against conscription, PERIOD. The solution isn't to drag women into mandatory conscription but to remove mandatory conscription for men. Women meeting quotas in jobs is a far more complex and nuanced discussion. You'd have to agree that fundamentally, barriers have existed (and still do today) that prevent women from reaching the heights of the career ladder that are afforded to men. Sexism, discrimination and toxic masculinity are all factors that influence whether a CEO position would be given to a man or woman, hypothetically assuming both are 100% equal for the job. EQUALITY is important; but so is EQUITY. We men have to acknowledge that discrimination exists against women in the workplace, and in order to enact long term, systemic change, introducing a system like quotas (not just anyone of course, but women qualified for the job) can be a beneficial thing to ensure we not only make up for the mistakes of the past, but also encourage and foster a long term change in society.
@@Iamthemiracle777 and I'm saying, if you want equal opportunity then ok but go through THE SAME EXACT physical tests. That's equality. And I'm sorry but we can't go around physical differences.
@@Iamthemiracle777Oh, please I wish that males could have same opportuniti as females in South Korea. Why are women given more chances of education just because they are women,?. Women's college that are in Seoul only lets in female making it alot easier for women to get into those colleges in Seoul(similar to IVY league if it was for US) And only way Korean can be lawyer, chemist, doctor is going into lawschools, med schools -> men have to get twice better score to become lawyer, chemist, doctore just because they are born as man, because half of med, law schools are assigned to Women's college. SO PLEASE, TELL ME ABOUT EDUCATION DISCRIMINATION ON KOREAN MALE FIRST
@@Iamthemiracle777 Why is it only korean women who are compensated for career break with policy "parental leave" while korean men are compensated with nothing after military service for 2 years. Why is it only women who are acknowledged with career break? TELL ME WHY
Asian Boss, you really need to re-title this video. He isn't a radical anti-feminist. He's an anti radical feminist. Changing it to this is far more accurate and less misleading, and more true to the spirit of the quality, unfiltered journalism that Asian Boss has been leading the charge on for so many good years on so many tough topics.
I was about to say the same thing, he said that he is no opposed to the correct type of feminism, only the radical feminism. Which makes more sense imo.
@@martiddy “women should be obedient”, the over glorification and promotion of gender roles, implying that the biological differences between men and women are of more importance in day to day life than they actually are
@@Mrjulianifyable When he said that women should be obedient, he was talking about those women that refuses to follow the rules and start behaving in an uncivilized manner (like the radical feminist that stomped on the taxi roof), but I guess you're gonna omit the part where he said that he's obedient to his wife. Also, what do you mean by glorification of gender roles?. There's clear evidence that men and women are not biologically equal. Obviously, some jobs are gonna be more suited for men than for women where you are gonna need physical strenght like a police officer, firefighter, construction worker, soldiers, etc. And the opposite is also true where some jobs are more suited for women like personal care workers, nursing, etc. Though, this is just in average and not in general. He's not against between the equity of men and women, he's criticizing the absurd idea that all the jobs must have a 50/50 gender ratio.
In Japan, the country's medical school has been tampering with the student's exams results in order to exclude women and throw them out. Even for women that suceeded in surpassing the gender misconceptions and superstitions in the first place, they still need to prove themselves constantly, and struggle to surpass derogative behaviours based in gender only. If issues like these still exists in the supposedly more liberal West where women don't even receive the same salary as men do even if their credentials are equal or even better from men, I can't begin to imagine what's happening in the countries of Asia. Men and women are biologically DIFFERENT, not inferior or superior. Radicalism will only bring more radicalism from the other side as a reaction.
@@EnigmazGuide Can't say on this person's behalf, but I do know that women having a higher standard on college entrance exams is a thing. There's no need for ignorance here.
You have been misinformed about pay equality in the West. When researchers adjust for differences in profession, experience, and location, there is no pay difference between men and women. If women did work for 25% less wages, businesses would fill their companies with women as labor costs are a huge portion of a business expense.
Most of korean woman never care about national defense of south korea. They just wants equality about being an officer or a petty officer due to high salary and its help to their carrier but they totally don’t care about mandatory service because it cannot helps for their carrier and very small salary (less then 400dollar per month). Look what happening in korea now? A Police woman run away from a criminal even the scene of murder. I really proud of US police woman because their physical test of entrance exam is same as male. But its not working in korea if you want to become a government officer such as fire fighters, police woman and officer in a base only you need to pass the paper test because physical test can pass everybody even though a dog can pass that one.
I saw this guy on another interview and let me tell you from my impression, this one's not in it for men's rights, he's in it for the attention. He's actively provoking and creating hate in order to increase the division of both men and women, which ironically is what he thinks he's fighting against. He endorses the stereotype that all women are radical feminists when in fact that is only a an accusation with no basis. Feminist organizations in South Korea tackle down serious issues like hidden cameras, revenge pornography, SA, and continue to fight for higher wages meanwhile his movement only deters the crowd from the main goal by making embarrassing protests in questionable attire and provoking hate while also gaining media attention, so I understand why feminists wouldn't want to sit with him. In his other interview he was more clear about how he directs his movement, he even mentioned that he went to a feminist organization dressed up as a woman (obviously to mock the movement) and claimed he wanted to have a peaceful conversation with them. If you want to know how that ended, he was escorted out of the building empty-handed.
Suuuuure, it sure it's for that and NOT because Feminists vilify the whole Male sex while victimizing the Female Sex in practice, whine all you want, Facts are his side.
The fact that people think like this sickens me. They promote such a charming, alluding image of them in order to influence regular people because he’s not coming off as “extreme,” when in reality he is. If there were more women in government, that would help give them a voice on issues concerning women. Laws on abortion and birth control and whatnot should be made with women, why should men be allowed to make laws on women’s bodies when they aren’t impacted whatsoever by those laws.
Every man who's impregnated a woman is affected by those abortion laws in terms of child support, custody, alimony so yes men should have a say in what happens to their babies.
that wasn't that case. read more before you judge. and how is it terrorizing them when bunch of 'equal' women terrorized streets in groups ignoring the law screaming profanity and hatred towards men?
There is a simple reason why there should be a ratio in politics, it's because of representation. If your country has 51% men and 49% women, the represenation in politics should also be close to the same. "I don't want someone incompetent represent our country who got their through the ratio". There are plenty of incompetent politicians in your country who only got to their position because they were close to a competent politician. There is also something called "gender bias". If you rarely see a female politician you always unconciously assume that females are worse in that position of work. This also leads to minor mistakes being always met with the response "I knew she couldn't do it", while the a male counter part with the same mistake would have not even be noticed. This isn't just something happening against women btw. Maybe you have noticed yourself, that when a waitress makes a mistake like dropping glass on the floor, people are more likely to help the waitress than the male counter part, simply because waitresses usually are more prominent in that job field. Waiters are more often met with laughter, clapping or even ridiculing when dropping something.
This is full of assumptions and conclusions made from those assumptions. He clearly asks people to show him proof that gender qoutas are a net benefit to society. Point us to one study/research that claims that.
He says he does not see a reason why there should be just as many female representatives as male representatives, as he does not see what the benefit would be to society generally. He says this right after claiming he would support any push for "true" gender equality "if women were treated unfairly." This is not questioned, and yet the logical response is both effectively apolitical and based upon fairness: is it not unfair if 50% of the population is represented by less than 50% of representatives, where the other 50% is represented by over 50% of representatives?
The president of South Korea is a feminist. He practiced extreme feminism for his own self-interest and safety, and as a result, Korean men were harmed. The police who were supposed to protect the citizens ran away, and the men were culled with a policy for women. Schools teach that women should be respected and protected without effort, and that it is natural for men to make sacrifices for this. This is wrong. Until now, men have not complained about these problems. Many men were lazy and did not move unless it harmed them. But now it's different, the damage is starting to happen, and since a woman's false testimony can ruin his life, even normal women and men try to spread false feminism.
@@simrat9250 There were groups of moderate protests, but their RU-vid channel now averages 3,000 views. You are more foolish to criticize only short stories.
That's where he fails. Even if he makes good arguments, he's an attention seeker and that plays against him. Nobody will take seriously a person dressed up as mf joker (ew)
@@golbinnom What you unfortunately don't understand, is that in this day and age, men have a hard time getting a voice for their problems. He took it to the extreme, to get the attention, that this movement deserves. Could you off the top of your head list me 3 problems, men are facing in our western society today without googling it? I bet not. Because society don't gives a fk.
Really sad that you don't have a fact check to his statements, since its a ciritical topic. He says the radical feminists are lying/ lots of numbers etc. But he also could just lie, right? The fewest people here will fact check it themselves.
Can you refute that the value of men's achievements and sacrifices has been highly valued, but the value of life has traditionally been valued lower than that of women?
@@재독 And wouldn't that mean that since women had no rights in the structuring of societal norms, it is men that made it this way? It seems that patriarchy benefits no one. Men or women.
But he also talked about another example of his wife sacrificing for him during the hard times. He used it just as examples of harmony between men and women as well as the equal rights they deserve with the differences they have. It's not a gender polarizing statement, you must listen till the end.
I love this comment! I've never made that specific association, but I've always felt that radical parties polarize people and destroy communities instead of encouraging meaningful debates that truthfully look for solutions.
I disagree with not giving women a quota for the national assembly. The parliament in any country is an integral decision making body. The reason to have a good number of both the genders to be a part of it, is so that you get the perspective of both the sides. It is if the female politicians that made those horrible comments about korean men in private were in majority in the nation assembly. Korean men would then have difficulty in making their demands and problems known and worked upon. So look at it from that perspective.
Under that logic, we have to divide everything into tall people and short people, and handsome people and ugly people. Just because there are a lot of men in politicians doesn't mean they make a male-oriented policy.
@@오잉-f3kif you look at reports of crime against women and their lack of ability to tackle harrassment is majorly because of lack of representation. Quotas aren't free passes to the parliament, the person still has prove to be worthy of the position. Besides once a quantifiable gap between the different gender identities lessen, quotas can be removed. Also I didn't get your point about dividing things between tall, short, ugly and good looking people.
But half of the people doing the voting are women so if it's majority men in government who cares? They still were voted in and represent the voices of the women who voted for them.
have you heard of intersectionality? if you start this path, there are way too many ' equal' groups that need to be represented. how about age discrimination? so should we have equal age bracket? how about disability? should we make sure certain percent are disabled? how about homosextuals? elections are based on what ppl want in their districts, cities and government who were deemed by the ppl as competent to lead not mandated by superficial identity.
He sounds like a narcissist that found a cause, trying to ride the coattails of Jordan Peterson fame. There are a-holes on either side and a rational person sees right through his shallow rants. His tacky sweater was loud and clear. . .
I find it interesting how he and seemingly many other South Korean men are angered by women not wearing makeup while figures like Peterson criticize women for wearing it, even going as far as to say it's a sexual invitation. Damned if you do, damned if you don't it seems.
