Being A Radical Anti-Feminist In Korea | Stay Curious 

The fact that the feminist/women's orgs pulled out last minute while this guy can be so forthright and undaunted speaks volumes to the gender inequities in South Korea: there exists real, deleterious repercussions for women, while men can live unharmed, unbothered, untouched.

Maybe you should have waited until _you_ had both sides interviewed to release content like this. The fact you didn't and released it anyway says a lot about your standards here.

Isn’t it YOUR job to reach them??? Very odd

@@SoSoMikaelaSo, the "feminists" keep running away and we don't hear anything from anyone!? They actually had the courtesy to put this so very elegantly.

@@SoSoMikaela How can you wait someone who's never gonna show up? Hm? This says a lot about your commen sense here

His view of Gender Harmony is not Gender Equality

It takes away a huge group of people that is disadvantaged and can be exploited for your own benefit.

When he brought up Titanic as his ‘great example’ I started laughing so hard.

Of course supporting equal rights doesn't take anything away from us. But forcing same rights take a lot from all.

Most feminists I've seen are just the most vile and self-entitled people who act in a horrendous way under the guise of Feminism. Spouting "equal rights", while when men are being harrassed, ridiculed or being otherwise disadvantaged against they ( so called equality seeking Feminists ) are suspiciously quiet. And god forbid men who would stand their ground, defend themselves or help defend other men => then the so called 'equal right defenders' go after them like hungry seaguls after a piece of bread

And stupid. Have they’ve seen themselves

He is f disgusting 🤢

This man participated in this video to show all the viewers how much of a loser he is like most korean men. No wonder korean women don't want to get married.

Damn , where you gals create this stuff ? he didn't said it. I will never vote for u guys. I think media is manipulating men

Feminism is wrong

This.

Nicely said @RisottoYagami

You just proved his point.

@@AlexClayland1232 damn, who left you to be this bitter?

@@AlexClayland1232 "This" in this case means "I agree". If you say you agree wih someone, then by your definition, you saying something that is not valuable.

대한민국 여자 경찰은 여자 범인 하나 제대로 제압을 하지 못하며 남성과 동일한 월급을 받아갑니다. 이것이 성불평등입니다

We also want to focus on abilities and strengths rather than gender. That's also the basic position for those who oppose Korean feminism. However, in Korea, gender is considered more important than ability and strengths, and women are provided with much easier passing standards than men. Also, in Korea, there are many cases where female police run away from victims. I want you to know this situation.

If a women is strong enough to be a police, she may. If not, she may not. That's the same with men

Absolutely wrong. Educate yourself Not lardass males in the replies misunderstanding what I am saying 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

@@ariellekwong206 어디한번 그렇게 연설해봐라

Thank God.

@@aldaoroman This feminist/woke movement has´f up so many societies destroyed so many marriages and potential marriages beause they hate the traditional mother role. This hook up "culture" and hot girl summers has created hordes of low quality girls which have nothing to offer to society and will be single, not married in their 50s when it is too late for most.

@@MessiMerdo What do you mean "this" Feminism?, It's been like that since the Start, Feminism Is nothing but "Socialism in a Skirt".

@@aldaoroman If nazis were females

@@aldaoroman L

most of them are the same ones who will mob against a transgender or gay couple and belittle them as demonic or call them humping aids monkies

I'm guessing you either didn't watch the video, or pay attention to anything he said

im talking about feminists who literally did that 2 years back and a year ago

There is no speaking of harmony from those who aim to oppress you.

@@MyPetLynx you're the one who claims equality but blames feminists at the same time. We call it misogyny.

He does get it. He's a bit on the traditional side but overall his arguments make sense.

@@samuraijosh1595 why do men get to force women to wear makeup? If it’s truly about equality, just leave everyone alone. No one should get to dictate what someone else does. If a woman doesn’t feel like wearing makeup, it’s her right

@@oneironautz328 he's not forcing. He's just socially ostracizing such women.

​@@samuraijosh1595 you're crazy, why should people that don't wear makeup get ostracized? That's sexism with extra steps, just say you hate "ugly" women

​@@samuraijosh1595Imagine forcing women to put make up. Men getting mad and calling women lazy for not wearing makeup deserve to get their rights taken away for being ridiculous.

This!!!

yes

That assumes the female is in a romantic relationship with the male.

@@hbanana7 that assumes that you didn't even write down help and respect, and the fact that you accept everything offensive if men does that to you.

And calling out bad actors, including misandrists.

He's one of the best interviewers. I subscribe his channel and each time he asks the questions to the guest, I always admire his skill. Exact point I was curious, and he mentions.

@@JeanPierre70ju What is his channel name? I cannot find it

@@BlitzN7 New Men's Solidarity / 신남성연대

@@Bliz-zard I mean the interviewer's channel

@@BlitzN7 CarreraisTV

any evidence for this? It could have just been a strategic move by his ex-wife. The Silver Bullet False Allegation: A false allegation made with the intention of causing harm or winning a case. The term “silver bullet” refers to the idea that one false allegation can be used to win a case or gain an advantage.

⁠@@zzz1test1zzz That person has already been fined and determined guilty. You can search that on probably most of korean media using a sentence “안정권 동맹 유튜버 배인규, 아내폭행 해명도 거짓으로 드러나”. It can be roughly translate into “An ally RU-vidr of An-Junggueon, Bae-Inkyu faced revelations that his explanation for spousal abuse was also exposed as false”

Proof?

Nome lol

I believe they are superior in some ways. But again, in some ways women are also superior to us men. The most important thing probably in our society nowadays for it to function properly, is physical work which generally makes men superior to women. And also, obeying someone doesn't mean that there is no equality. As your statement is suggesting, there should also be no hierarchy in the military e.g. since there are lieutenants, generals etc. The feminism you perceive as of today is what should be hated, since it completely shits on equality and disregards basic human nature (e.g. the male instinct to protect) with feminists saying things like: "I DONT NEED YOU TO PROTECT ME, JUST DONT HURT ME!!"). Of course there still are feminsts that *truly* aim for equality but this mindset unfortunately has a severe lack of supporters nowadays.

@@samihindi Physical work is less important in modern society than ever? It's increasingly getting replaced by more service type work. (something women are better at since women tend to have better social skills generally because of all types of reasons) And why should women obey men according to you? Male instinct to protect? Don't women have an instinct to protect? What?

Men all know that they have to pay for things, only women's rights don't know

@@dehistoriapisciumfish7639 if men stop working even for a week. The whole world will go through an economic crisis. What are you talkin about. I'm all about equality but you have to agree that there are many things which only men can do better. It's not even that hard to digest

Spoken like a true feminist🤣🤣

👍👍

Please keep updated from what korean feminists are doing. All of the hate speeches are coming from them nowadays. Such a miserable reality.

Thank you !

Thnx!

Thank you very much 😊

Totally agree, it seems that korea is majorly male dominated and when some women try to point this out and demand change they feel threatened so they say things from their privileged perspective and act as a victim when 95% of the time it doesn’t even affect them.

he said mostly not only, stupid

@@lovetsumugi.a why, even if men are in general stronger than women, why can't we have women working in these positions as well?

@@lovetsumugi.a He said women aren't made for that job because of their physique, so you want me to believe that he thinks some women should still work there? Your logic doesn't make any sense.

Lets be honest, Men and Women are built differently. lets not be blind about that. A woman have to work harder than a man to have a strong built and carry out heavy duties and roles like fire fighter, policeman, soldier, etc. And a man have much more stamina than a woman. There are even experiments where woman and man who are fire fighters compete with each other on who will knock down a door in case a victim is trap inside a room where there is a fire. The woman can't knock down the door at once, she tried so many times but she cant even tho she is built. But the man knocked it down in one blow. Entering in a workforce like this, where life and death is at stake, do we really need to have a gender issue? The job will be given to the one who is more SUITABLE for the job and not just because of a gender. And a police job is not just about scanning a woman's body, its about protecting the welfare of the citizen in the country.

Tldr: didn’t watch the video

Well looks like someone didn't even bother to watch the video

you mean the misandrists....oops the feminsts?

@@buriedomasta3375 misandry doesn't exist honey

@@kkrata8221 look again it's pretty evident in society and I am pretty happy men are waking up and pointing it out, are you a misandrist by the way? Do you hate men? Because only misandrists say misandry doesn't exist😏

Seconded, this is a classic case of equality of opportunity versus equality of outcome.

Why should there be equal opportunitys? Thats like a new religion to most of the world right now. If I think about the police or military i want strong men. Why should a women be given this opportunity when i can have only tall men?

@@dr.livesey7595 an equal opportunity does not mean you HAVE to hire a woman in the military. It means everyone is able to apply regardless.

@@jvlopamia6504 So you want to write me a Letter but there is a 100% chance i wont hire you. Why should i waste time with reading these Letters?

@@dr.livesey7595 giving opportunity doesn't necessarily mean they are qualified. Only take that opportunity if they feel qualified. why go for a useless attempt.

I think there is a problematic issue with the translation or the difference of the English and Korean language. If you search via dictionary or translate the word 순종, it could give you a result somewhere along the line of obediencia(Spanish). But this is a simplified and generalised sample due to the difference in use or origination of words between cultures and nations. The word he has used is not best described as obey. A more suitable word for obey in Korean is 복종 服從 which the two characters combime into a definition: follow directly from an order or direction. Whereas the person in this interview uses the word 순종 順從. The difference of the first characters/syllables makes the meaning of the word entirely different. The character 順, in a Korean understanding, suggests to numbering or the natural order of things such as time and numbers. So in a commonly known definition, 순종 means to follow without neglect. Naturally. I don't know whether this changes your stance on the video or anything, but for me, I have the trust for my partner to naturally follow their suggestions as I would also expect some form of trust and respect from them. Collaboration.

In Asian countries they expect the man to be in control in Asian cultures that’s how it is. In America it’s more open. That’s why

@@51844mj It's the opposite. The female thinks they can kill their babies without asking the male, but they decided to give birth to it, the male has to pay for it.

This kind of mentality creates disharmony and distrust between family members no matter the roles because if you are against the idea of "having to obey" someone, then you would be against the children having to listen to their parents demands/commands. And secondly, you either are against the idea of masters and servants being acceptable in the modern century OR you are ONLY against husbands and wives treating each other as such whereas you are okay with it being acceptable in other roles throughout society which would be questionable. So which one are you?

@@homeblue7667 they didn’t say children shouldn’t obey their parents. they were talking about marriage

this is exactly it.

You say 'gender roles' and instantly pin down everything on 'patriarchy'. What a neutral standpoint in always trying to blame someone else.

@@lilac2698 The age old system that has existed till date is patriarchal and they set all the rules. Won't you agree with this? So, gender roles were created by men and followed and supported by women. I don't think there were any matriarchal societies. So the society is to be blamed. A society which is patriarchal (it includes men AND women who continue to degrade women and place men on a pedestal.) Several times a woman is herself another woman's enemy. So many MOTHERS teach their daughters to be submissive and ideal in their behavior. So women are at fault too. But, as a whole men created this system and several women continued to support it. So, all in all its society's fault. The men began the oppression. Women were told to mold themselves a certain way, and in doing so they created a mould for the men too. They painted a definitive picture of what a male must be and what a female must be. They forgot that men and women both have weaknesses which they should be covering on behalf of each other. Men and women must collaborate, not compete. In any case, currently women are on the lower end. Feminism is required to bring them up to where men are. Women are already strong but there is an issue with the way that society perceives that strength. Feminism is required so that a woman can stand eye to eye with a man and hold his hand in order to collaborate. This is MY OPINION, don't come onto me.

@Unni Unni Like literally, for so many years patriarchy fashioned women in accordance to its own needs. Prostitution, slavery, child bearing name the crime and its up there. (**Child bearing is not a crime, it is essential for the survival of the species but not if the woman does not want to bear) Didn't patriarchy for so long change women (and men) the way it wanted to change them (aka, on its own whims). Like c'mon patriarchy is the definition of hypocrisy. Some feminists might be hypocrites but patriarchy literally invented the word lmao 🤣😂😆😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣

@Unni Unni Also, you act as if men as saints. Now imagine if the society was predominantly matriarchal and there was an uprising of mennists (😂😂), wouldn't they just target the matriarchal system in accordance to their own specific needs. Like c'mon those men would have been tortured for centuries, I would cut them some slack. Anyways, You use 'feminist' as if it's a ducking curse word. So be it, I am a crazy feminist *****, so no point arguing with me right?

What don't you agree on?

@@jamesluccin4553 likely his inherently sexist views on gender roles and the gender harmony nonsense

@@Mrjulianifyable what did he say was sexist?

@@jamesluccin4553 That fella probably thinks that the interviewee is suggesting that women should be barred from certain roles that men are biologically better at, like physically-demanding work such as being a fire fighter, because some of these "wokeist" people cannot concieve the fact that men and women are not biologically equal, therefore the interviewee must be suggesting sexist policy. This is very much American wokeist culture that cannot comprehend nuance, and can only see things in binary terms. Which I note is hilariously ironic, seeing that the same culture advocates for non-binaries.

@@Frostea honestly man americans tires me. They let émotions run over logical thoughts

Hello from Australia! I have many Punjabi friends and I think India looks like a great country. Personally I do not like feminism at all, would you like to talk about feminism with an open mind? I'm willing to change my mind, and if your willing to change yours then I would love to have a conversation

I have honestly never heard someone excusing grown men committing crimes by saying "men will be men". The saying is "boys will be boys" and is used to brush off stupid, harmless stuff a kid would do. Some feminists took that and perverted it in their sick, psychopathic minds until it became this ridiculous idea that people are excusing horrible crimes committed by men.

@@therainbowconnection6813 in her mind you're a sexist or you're an idiot, it's better to meet these people on there level before reasoning with them, remember feminism is a largely emotionally driven movement. Logic and rationally has little to do with there beliefs, and you can't reason someone out of something they didn't reason themselves into

@@water7845 if you didn't live under the earth water you'd know that feminists do fight for men who are raped by women too please go read some news and please come out of all that dirt man It really pains me to see dumb people like you to be laughed at

@@therainbowconnection6813 well you were right till the part that says people dismiss the "men will be men and boys will be boys behaviour" but you see we never made eating banana a sexual symbol, we never made bending down from the waist to pick up something you people with that dammed perverted and sick ideology made that, we simply grew fed up with it and started to defend OURSELVES AND THE ONES OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER WHO GET TREATED THE SAME WAY so please go see a therapist

An extreme feminist like you sees a small number of sex offenders and defines all men as potential sex offenders. You have to realize that this is very wrong.

Korea is the safest country for women in the world. Still, more women feel threatened by sex crimes than in Russia. In fact, the rate of sexual assault by women per capita is the lowest in the world. The media is crazy. This is a big problem. Already we are doing our best.

he said the first is to admit difference tho. I agree about the crimes, he seems more interested in policies. "Maybe if they focused on calling each other's misogyny more as well as women's misandry" I think he's exactly doing that

K-Andrew Tate

South Korea is among the safest places on Earth there is no high degree of any criminal action. That is not to say people not are victimised but honestly the bigoted fashion some South Korean women represent facts. Is entirely without justification and based purely on hate.

I'd rather hold a gun than watch what feminists are up to.

that’s what feminism means. equal right and opportunities for all

@@cocokoochie9648 But why is there a word "femina" in that name that means women? Do women mean gender equality? Do men mean gender discrimination? Shouldn't we use neutral words instead of 'femina'?

@@user-gf6iv1pb5n Well I mean mankind also has 'man' in it but still it denotes everyone right?

@@user-gf6iv1pb5n let me point out similar words to you. MANkind, sportsMANship, huMANity, huMAN. according to your logic, does the following words exclude women? if it helps expand your knowledge, the word femina in feminism makes the most sense since this term started as equal right for women since they were denied the right to be a human being. and still are.

episode number or link please

Yeah same!! I recognised him as soon as I saw him.....dude was being bizarre about him being handsome

And he has been charged for beating his wife too.

do you mean this episode: "My friend thinks he is a prince, please do something about it! [Hello Counselor / 2017.06.19]" ?

@@Nika12460 Yes

Tbh no one should be forced to join the army

Feminists be like NO

@@j_me Peace on earth totally. Even if I want it, will others say they don't?

if that will make men shut up, then sure, but we all know that won't happen

That should be determined by your physical aptitude not gender. Some women can be in the frontline too and sone men can help better in the back as well But I agree the same standards should apply to everyone

I think the organization's mindset can be inferred quite well from this interview. The feminism they are combating is the kind that promotes female chauvinism rather than gender harmony.

@@wiltmarlonelao that’s exactly what i was thinking when i first watched this. there are no doubt more feminist groups that promote solidarity than groups that do not. peculiar to focus on one that doesn’t.

A video like this in America... hoooo boy. lol.

@@wiltmarlonelao agreed, but at the same time he has very sexist views that he masks as “gender harmony”

honestly i think ur bit of a sook and understand AB is the one organisation we should trust. If ur such a snowflake just get lost.

hes against feminism,what did you expect?

Right. he is just misogynistic.

You don't know his side of the story. Women are as abusive as men in any relationship.. pointing the mistake only on a man is the most misadnric thing you can say.

@@geetsahani There's a video of a woman trying to frame her husband by beating her own face up in an elevator, which was caught on tape. LOL!

With hammer or metal bat?

Interviewer should ask better questions than Lol you think sexual assault rape and domestic violence is a problem? Try going to jail for those problems when a woman reports you for personal enimity And yes in many places there are unequal opportunities like women get selected for the job for being women

@@rifatislam5836 Are you living under a rock ?? Do you really think rape and domestic violence is not a problem ?? Kindly stfu . Seriously !! How ignorant one has to be to make such a statement . You are invalidating the experience of thousands of people who've gone though these. Also , pls refrain from doing whataboutery here bcoz that doesn't improve anything but takes away the limelight from issue being highlighted .

@@rifatislam5836 you are the reason why stupid people shouldn’t have the right to speak

Sexual crimes are definitely a serious problem. However it is not a problem caused by women hate. It is a problem caused by human to human. It is not a gender problem. However feminists use every issue and make it a gender issue. If they fall of a bike they will argue they fell because they are a women. Plus unequal opportunities? There is no such thing espacially in korea. There is no wage gap, only men goes to mandatory military training for two years while women study, jobs legally have to hire women for some degree even if they lack skill.

As if feminists talk about it. They blame patriarchy and move on to woman's rights

Thank you for saying what I wouldn’t have the patience to say! The most elevated class will always complain about the slightest inconveniences or changes to their privilege. “Some Women no longer wear makeup and cut their hair, how terrifying.” Like ok maybe that means that women is a “misandrist” lol, do you now fear going to the toilet in case someone records you? Do you now fear walking outside at night? Do you now fear rejecting a woman in case she kills you? Well?

I couldn't agree more

I think harmony should be accepted but without any fixed standards or with standards that both could agree upon instead. Just like you even if majority wants to play this role not everyone wants the same so exceptions should be more accepted.

By using quotas, you assume to know what the gender ratio of any group should actually be. You see what you observe to be an unequal situation, and because it's unequal, then to you it's automatically wrong. Which is the wrong way to approach anything. There are jobs in the world for example, that (almost) only men choose to do. Women are not prevented from applying, but next to none apply. Has it ever occurred to you that there are certain tradeoffs to leadership, that the average woman isn't interested in? Longer work hours, greater responsibility for people beyond yourself, greater inflexibility of work schedule, and a generally increased amount of pressure, to name a few things common to leadership roles. The surest way to screw up the future, is to engineer a new societal structure, when you didn't even understand the one that you destroyed.

"cultural constructs" ... yet, we find that every human culture comes to the same conclusions about the genders, comes up with the same archetypal imagery and mythos. Your "construct" is better understood as "evolution", but you can't handle that.

I could tell you were a man from your comment alone. You have zero conscience of the women opression if you think it's just that easy. Women won't reach position of power if they're not given the right education. Women won't reach position of power if they're not socialize to to have ambition. Women won't reach position of power if the whole of society expects them to bare the weight of being the caregiver in every situation (family and other). Women won't reach position of power if they're constantly confronted with stereotypes about their gender. And for endless other reasons, its not "only about competences". You are oblivious to the reality of white patriarchy.

@@sarahno7223 In my opinion, you are wrong on several levels: 1. Concerning education, boys and girls are equally educated in the western world, in my home country even more women statistically get a good A levels result and study at universites than men. There are no laws that exclude women from certain contents regarding education, so women have the same opportunities and chances to have a successful career as men do. 2. It's true that it's still more expected from women to take care of the kids than from men; however, no one forces you to have children, so that's not an obstacle in your way if you want to make a career. IF you decide to have children, that's your choice and you obviously have the responsibility to take care of them, but I agree that the responsibility should be split up more equally between the father and the mother. 3. Men are just as affected by stereotypical expectations regarding their gender as women are, they are just different. Being expected to not show feelings, always be the strong and tough guy, that a muscular body is a "must" and that dads are less important than mums are just some of those. Men are equally burdened by that than women are with their expectations. You talking about "white patriarchy" proves that you are a US American citizen. The idea that people who happen to be male and of European heritage are intentionally oppressing every other group of people to stay at the top is quite ridiculous, to put it mildly. I'm from a European country and in contrast to the US, we do not have those problems of a "white supremacy" here. And one last tip: if you REALLY care about women's rights and gender equality, you should campaign for helping women who are really oppressed in their home countries by law AND by culture, like so many Middle Eastern countries with Arabian and Muslim influence. The situation of women there is not comparable with yours as a globally privileged woman living in a first world country. Those women need your help way more than Western women. But that would REALLY require you to see further than the end of your nose, and, let's be honest, that is quite unlikely in your case, considering the fact that you rant so intensively about the oppression of women in first world countries...

@@davidkoslowski2697 right. I won't even bother contradicting you as it is clear you choose to ignore the reality in which occidental countries live, their responsability in the precarious state off said woman in the middle east, aswell as your own privilige as a man. My experience as woman doesn't stand before your imparable knowledge :) I can so tell you've been through so much to reach such a higher level of comprehension of the non existence of discrimination of any form in Europe. May you share it with many more sir, it is highly valuable ;)

@@sarahno7223 Okay. If you are still interested in continuing this conversation: No, I never said that there is no discrimination in any form in Europe. Don't twist my words. You keep mentioning those topics (the reality in occidental countries, OUR responsibility towards suppressed women in the middle East and male privilege), so much that I'm really interested in you actually explaining what you mean by that. Everyone can throw in random keywords, but can you explain them? I'm open to hear/learn something new ;)

@@sarahno7223 why so toxic? You'll never be taken seriously with that attitude.

He then clarified that it was an example and that the converse can also hold.

He said it should be mutual did you even listen to the interview?

Different cultural values at play as well.

It took him a while to get to that lol. The thing is, people don't like to be subservient to others. it doesn't matter which way you turn it. We all want to be free to make our own choices and decisions.

@@vanyadolly I agree with that

Absolutely wrong

lol. That's fine; keep framing the argument that way. It won't work forever.

Exactly. Thanks for being right side. -From korean student.

@@ariellekwong206 Could you please explain what's wrong? You should not be treated because you are a woman and you should not be discriminated against because you are a man.

@@ariellekwong206 Bark without any logical reason. Who will listen?

Wow if that's true I can totally understand the men in Korea. It doesn't sound like equal rights between men and women at all

@@katharsis746 perfectly true

+solamente los hombre en corea tienen obligación militar por 18 meses

Are you aware that women's libraries, parking lots, subway seats and rental apartments just exist due to the fact that women get (sexually) harassed and stalked on a daily basis?

What a pity guys you are 😡 Is that true?? X(

The thing is, as hard as it is to understand, in general, social gender norms are derived from sex qualities or to be more exact from the biological side. For example, is expected for a woman to stay with her baby after birth and to be a nurture, because she and the baby have a psychological, emotional, physical and hormonal bound that the man doesn't have with the baby. Is expected that the man goes to work and brings the food to the table, cause psychologically he has a hunting nature, to protect and provide for his family. Like this, there are many gender rules that people think are just "social construct", but their not, there's a reason and a meaning behind human behavior, it's not all about culture, prejudices and stereotypes, the biological part is very deep and rooted inside people's nature.

@@yamiletsoler3464 Agree. But many technological advances have led many societal changes and even let people overcome biological, innate differences. Mr. Bae has many good points about radical feminist movements in Korea now. I agree with him, but he lost me with a story of Titanic. Gender Harmony sounds really nice and idealistic, but, for me, like he mentioned, we have to find the root causes of this radical feminist movement. What has caused this? How this has been intensified, and why? For me, underlying this radical movement, there are technological advances along with education. Technological advances have freed many people from labor work itself and education has let people think critically - let people doubt the status quo. We also need to acknowledge that from the very beginning people have refused to be "status quo" - and that is exactly why people have constantly created something and accelerated technological advances and societal changes.

That was what I exactly experienced while watching this clip. He has made really many good points I totally agree, but I'm afraid that he hasn't gotten the concept of "equity" right. For me, either he seems to misunderstand the concept or refuse to understand it right. Lastly I wish he could have come up with a better term rather than "Gender Harmony" which sounds a bit too idealistic and vague.

Here is my repost from a earlier comment. I hope I can convince you to change your mind if possible. "Looking at some of the comments and unsurprisingly even a few with a large number of thumbs up. You can clearly see how feminism has made people stupid, naive, and willfully ignorant. A lot of the attacks are very general bland attacks that contain no substance that somehow never pinpoint what exactly the guy says wrong. There are also comments that seem to discredit him because he dressed up in certain costumes. EVEN THOUGH he clearly explains why he does that in the interview. Then there are also comments that warp the truth and quote only a portion of what the man says. When the guy mentioned obedience and sacrifice between a man and woman using titanic as an example, the interviewer asked what if the roles were reversed. The man clearly says reversing roles would still be the same, then goes on to give a personal example from his life. Talking about how much his wife suffered and sacrificed when his business failed and how much support he got from his wife. Which did nothing but help revitalize his devotion, love and faith to his wife, true obedience. Feminism has gone from something genuine and righteous, into this man hating women elitism movement, pure misandry. You can scour the comments and see for yourself what feminism has become. Willful and deliberate ignorance, out of pure spite and hatred. Cutting quotes short to fit "their" narrative, never willing to open up their hearts and minds to actually listen to the opposing side. It has become a illness and disease, a mental sickness. Everyone here knows the truth why no feminist representatives came out for the interview. Its because they know deep inside they are wrong and don't want to be crucified in public. Saying they didn't appear due to harassment or attacks is pure excuses, everyone here knows this is a pre-recorded youtube video. Voice warping and mosaics can be done easily. Everyone who can think for themselves know the obvious. The only reason they didn't appear is because they have no confidence in their movement and beliefs. They have no confidence in their actions and don't want to take responsibility for them. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a "brigade" of feminists (shoot if we go the conspiracy route, this could all be a charade done by a 3rd party to create a divide and dissent among the people by parties of interest) whose jobs are to make such dumbs comments to change and warp the publics opinion through deception and taking advantage of peoples short attention spans, or their laziness. Reminds me of what people call the pro-communist chinese spammers. The 50c army. Same difference. Too lazy to watch a 40min video from start to finish but have all the qualifications and judgements to ridicule the man and upvote comments that make you "feel good" or aligns with your ideals/beliefs without listening to the guy? How is that a logical conversation. Its just screaming your ideals at the top of your lungs while you cover your ears. This is the type of people we are trying to have a conversation with, like talking to a wall. No logic, no sense, only hatred. I'm not a anti-feminist nor involved with anything of that category be it on the internet/politically or other. I just see a bunch of people hating on the guy and as someone who watched the video. I do not understand at all what he has said wrong. Seriously everything he has said has been logical, no excuses, no cheap shots, comments made on a base of neutral and mutual respect. Even his wife is there to support him while she is behind the camera. Am I the crazy one? Or has everyone else gone crazy? These are some confusing times we live in. Word of advice, take every comment you see be it reddit or youtube or any social platform with caution and wariness. Much like you guys have heard about fake and/or biased news. The internet, forums and social platforms have also become a battleground of propaganda. Don't think that every comment you see is from an actual individual and always give a thought that there could be a possibility that forces in the background are doing social engineering to change and warp public opinions. Yes, that includes my wall of text as well. Judge it as you will, but make sure its a judgement based on actual self-critical thinking and logic. Not based on emotions, feelings and predisposed prejudice."

The main problem is that radical feminists want a 50% women quota in parliament which puts mediocre women into power and make bias decisions (as they cannot win elections on their own), how does that benefits society and economy?

The difference is that women were actually legally second class citizens through most of history so they have a better claim at being opressed

People who think in black and white tend to make illogical claims like that because they generalise and think every person belonging to a particular group are the same

the Megalia vs. Ilbe situation in South Korea is literally the very embodiment of the phrase "eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind".

Equality of opportunity frightens bigots

It’s actually an issue when the female then tries to find a suitable partner for herself. She then goes looking for a partner that makes more but can’t find one on her level financially adequate...it’s called hypergamy. It’s biological and a problem ever since women entered the workforce. There are stats to back it up.

You didn't watch the video didn't you. If it qas truly fair it won't be even close to being controversial. Women get additional points just because of their gender. Don't think of it as the system you have for racial minorities in US because South Korea is a heavely wetern influenced country, not a country like Saudi Arabia, and women had no legilative or judicial restirctions since the independence in 1945. They just want the juicy jobs not the crappy jobs like taxi drivers, factory production line workers, or trash collector which apparently, female participation is quite low here in South Korea. And above that all. Femnists in South Korea reject gender minorites, and refuse to participate in the Korean military, which is a obligation for all 'men' in South Korea because of the crazy rocket men north of here. Feminim is not the absolute good in ANY situation. Nothong is absolute and people should know that

Did he say anything about opportunities?

No, women getting the same salary as men for not putting in the same work hours is controversial.

I think it was in reference to his antics after, not before that.

What a psycho...

he dresses as the joker to be entertaining (said in the video) and he did. And by "Following" he did not stalk them just went there to the gathering (think of it like following in social media). You guys have to understandyou can't take subtitles literally, hearing the message itself in it's native language also the difference in culture must be taken in consideration.

@@justininexile3445 doesn't help his case AT ALL

@@Fruitystyleangel I mean, you can counter protest a protest. The context was that after the fact it was reported that men physically and verbally assulted the feminist gathering - clearly in video he just walks along and shoots the water in the air, not sure if what he said at that moment counts as verbal assault. I was correcting the original comment as the subtitles made it seem like the reporting and events were switched.

That’s your one take away from this 40 minute talk. Nice

@@el6700 nope, I've made multiple comments but you just picking this one, is probably the simplest way for you to say anything against me xD

@@el6700 they just pointed out something he said, why are you so pressed about it?

By self-care he probably meant "making yourself presentable" to......(now don't get your panties twisted)...to people in general, not just men. I do "self-care" every time I step out for something important as a man.

@@RealTaIk whom do you support tho

Yeah the rule itself is definitely outdated, but I'd also say his way of explaining it as well as mentioning the roles can be reversed for genders is still a lot better than most countries that abide by that mindset

he did say the roles could be reversed at 12:38. his argument is sufficient but could get more solid for his sake

Lmfao u guys didnt finish the video and started commenting like come on

I find that women prefer to "obey" (or top from the bottom, as I like to call it). Especially during the courting period and sex. Women don't want to pay, and they want the man to carry the relationship... Is that equity? No. Why do women pretend to want equality?

@@shin-ishikiri-no You know it's more to life than sex and a relationship. This is your second comment I've seen so far. A woman must have treated you this way for you to act like this. You're using that experience or those few experiences to go against all women. Let it go or date and surround yourself with men.

Just because he said so doesn't mean it. What you can't do and what you don't do are different. He criticized those who don't.

I don't think females wearing make-up is self care, it's unconscious sexual signaling. Women may not agree with this, but that's what's underneath.

He was generalizing a bit. It doesn’t mean every woman must wear makeup.

I'm the same as you, I have really sensitive skin and I'm allergic to a lot of things so I just don't bother wearing it lol Even some moisturizers make me break out in hives like UGH

Make-up isn't self-love. It was created so we look acceptable to the male gaze. Man-made us used to look appealing to their eyes. Especially in SK go to work without makeup, made you look like you have less value. Its sad but, make is art and should be use because we want to used, not because someone brainwashing us that putting will make man want us

I cringed too but he explains after that it goes both way.

I didn't watch the whole video, but he's not a real Men's Rights Activist if he thinks like that. Men don't owe protection to women. In fact, that thought goes against the very foundation of MRA. MRA is about giving men the choice, even if that choice is to put their own safety before a woman's.

He didn't say that women should be "obedient" to men. He said that both the genders should RESPECT each other. That thing got lost in the Korean to English translation

@@burner1072 Figures. It could very well be an intentional mistranslation to make the MRA look stupid.

I was about to say the same thing, he said that he is no opposed to the correct type of feminism, only the radical feminism. Which makes more sense imo.

At the same time though he did have some “radical” or I guess extreme views that’s were inherently sexist.

@@Mrjulianifyable Like for example?

@@martiddy “women should be obedient”, the over glorification and promotion of gender roles, implying that the biological differences between men and women are of more importance in day to day life than they actually are

@@Mrjulianifyable When he said that women should be obedient, he was talking about those women that refuses to follow the rules and start behaving in an uncivilized manner (like the radical feminist that stomped on the taxi roof), but I guess you're gonna omit the part where he said that he's obedient to his wife. Also, what do you mean by glorification of gender roles?. There's clear evidence that men and women are not biologically equal. Obviously, some jobs are gonna be more suited for men than for women where you are gonna need physical strenght like a police officer, firefighter, construction worker, soldiers, etc. And the opposite is also true where some jobs are more suited for women like personal care workers, nursing, etc. Though, this is just in average and not in general. He's not against between the equity of men and women, he's criticizing the absurd idea that all the jobs must have a 50/50 gender ratio.

Feminism isn't the s Feminism is saying that women and men are equal, full-stop. Hating men isn't the same things as feminism.

@@yogachick1955 Agree. In my comment i was actually referring to the man being interviewed, i just realized it wasn't clear who i was writing to and about haha.

I lean more conservative, and i thought the same thing. there shouldn't be a universal rule that women should obey men. it's a choice. Personally i love to "submit" to my man (because he is trustworthy and a man of character), but imposing that general rule unto society can be dangerous.

I too initially felt that there was something wrong with the analogy of one gender needing to be subservient while the other sacrifices. Yet, as he expounded on that point, I believe what he's simply trying to say is that we should learn to respect and give way to one another. Ideally speaking, we ought to obey those who are more capable in a certain field, and sacrifice for those who are less capable, regardless of gender. He's simply pointing out the beauty in this kind of interaction where we accept our flaws and give control to the one who can best handle the situation.

Lol not what he said

Do you know which episode

If you get an episode number that'd be great. The more I can find about this guy the better I can see where he's coming from.

@@_Dingu Episode 329

ad hominem This is not different than people saying that all feminists have broken marriages and poor mental health. Bring reasonable arguments

The issue with the modern movement is many call themselves misandr*sts. That isn’t equality, that’s wanting superiority especially if many are using that label.

of course, I agree on every list of yours. but most feminist in South korea hate on LGBTQ+ and very very radical. and the most important point is that more than 80% of women piggyback on the radical feminist and very very disregard on equal rights.

Yeah it's so funny and true

Right? I said out loud: is this man really gonna use the titanic as an example lmfao

@@Esandeech2 but he made a point

@@nana-uf5ql The point was stupid.

@@EnigmazGuide „Harmony“ is equal to „hierarchy“ for this guy. That’s no harmony I wanztet be part of.

They are men, no one cares

@@alisaforster28691 I wouldn’t say that, mostly because hardly anyone shares their story. It also goes with the “mental health being taboo” in Korea/society

There is a time and a place for that topic, and it is neither now, nor here.

@@TheDeceptiveHero is it so? When korean feminists treat soldiers as something below human? That is the point of everything. The fake feminists of korea despise men, transgenders, soldiers, and even women who dont support their feminism. Literally everyone who isnt helpful to them. They are power-hungry monsters who use the mask of feminism

@@user-ne2rx1ms8x Agreed, although the ones abusing and harassing the soldiers are the men they’re with. They take advantage of them and are true monsters that don’t even care about feminism or anything like that…

Is it somehow wrong because he holds them? Make your own statement make sense.

You made that guess not him lool

@@markaurelius61 no one said it was wrong? You seem to have thought that way by yourself, lol u thought u did something

@@mikaka160 The snarky attitude in "the correct type is what he and other men like him deem it to be" suggests that Kendall has rejected his ideas only knowing them from the transcript of an interview. The only thing I think he has done wrong is use the word obey, which has been discussed here. The real life example of "obedience" seems to be him obeying by rising up to be worthy of the sacrifice his wife made for him after he experienced a business failure.

The fact is the new wave of feminism isnt fighting for womens rights or gender equality

if you are talking about korean men in their 20/30s they are not wrong

I always ask men about my political views.. Feminism, religion views, etc etc... I have never encountered a man who actually understand what feminism is.

Feminists are 'useful idiots' in the not so secret communists' ambition to destroy the family unit. Women working at home are not serving the aims of the collectivist state.

@@tictoc900912 Women are still discriminated against more than men. The only legitimate point MRAs have is the military service, but that has nothing to do with feminism. Their patriarchal government came up with that.

If Men get paid More than Women "For the same job", ¿Why will it be people bother to Hire Men when Women are "Cheaper and equally efficient"?. Arrogant and Ignorant people like Feminists are the worst.

Didn’t Asian Boss tried to bring in Radical Feminists to share their viewpoint and they didn’t come. They had an opportunity to share with him their point of view and they didn’t. So I really don’t think he has to ´wonder’.

Why is the existence of patriarchy in the 21st century so demanded of young men in the 21st century? And why are you pretending not to know about the female version of Room N...?

Do you think there are a lot of women in their 20s, 30s, 40s who are currently patriarchal to Korean women? And wouldn't the direct damage be women in their 50s, 60s, and 70s? Wouldn't it be the right way to give them adequate protection and compensation?

You think that it is natural for young Korean men in their 20s to go to the military, but why do you not take issue with the fact that there is no compensation for the two-year deprivation period after being discharged from the military?

Why don't you take issue with the fact that Korean women insisted on getting rid of the benefits after being discharged from the military?

@Kyul Kim Yeah, I think Korean feminism needs to focus on men's liberation in order to legitimize their cause. It's only more recently in the west that men's liberation has been focused on and even here it's severely lacking. Feminism needs to acknowledge that both men and women suffer at the hands of patriarchal society and ideals. Both men and women should have to serve, or neither. You can't purport equality in the aspects it serves you but then not in the ones it doesn't.

Thank you, drag him. Like can they not give interviews to people like this pls? He also has a criminal record of beating his wife.

@@bmwjourdandunngoddess6024 hard to believe that considering there are too many cases of women beating their husbands and using their privileges to frame an innocent dude

Feminism doesn't support women's choice and freedom to do whatever they want. It only supports woman's choice to live a non-traditional life. So men's rights movements like New men's solidarity is a direct reaction to that. Stop this mental gymnastics to somehow put him in a bad light.

@@mellamojeff458 why are you making this about men? We know it happens to them too. But this is literally about a dude beating his wife. Why do you feel the need to insert something else?

Yeah right. I'm shocked Asian Boss just gave this guy a platform to spew his ideology without any pushback. But I guess they're just that centrist.

Apparently they're his fans from his channel.

@@ConstantinKlose-sj4mb what i find so crazy is that many of their talking points resemble 50s western misogyny, the overstatement of biological differences, the misleading stories, the persecution complex, but most importantly, the refusal to address the elephant in the room, i think most men are willing to listen to Korean men because they undoubtedly have it rough bc of the mandatory military service, but Korea is also widely known for its spycam and abuse problem and anti-feminists went viral but getting triggered over an emoji. Going back to the video, i think if anyone lives under a rock it’d be easy to be persuaded by this rather well spoken guy and the lack of perspective, i don’t buy that AB couldn’t bring perspective themselves, they could’ve, they didn’t need feminists to do it for them but oh well, let’s see how this goes.

@@biomutant1468 I think you still don't understand. Their logic is more disastrous than they think. For your information, I understand that you said 200,000 in another comment is less than 20,000. The problem is that reporters in Korea, which just mass-produced and created fake news, and the feminist who gave it an excuse. It's not even a hidden camera prank, it's a determined crime. For your information, I'm not trying to omo. For reference, in Korea, a law was made to prevent it, but only Korean companies, except where and where the incident occurred, became the scope of the crackdown. I really don't know... Let's see if this is right.

@@ConstantinKlose-sj4mb exactly what I said! My respect for Asian Boss is on the balance. And all the hateful comments is so gross. They claim there are no internet abuse toward women as they spout abuse.

This is full of assumptions and conclusions made from those assumptions. He clearly asks people to show him proof that gender qoutas are a net benefit to society. Point us to one study/research that claims that.

How about bricklayers then? There should also be 50-50 representation right.

you are a fool

So equal representation in power but not in any role of public service eg the draft.

@@RNA0ROGER yep

Why should women be in involved in males low iq problem solving? You men start wars, go enjoy them.

Even better, how about no mandatory military service?

Maybe is time to touch some grass xd

@@wolfferonihow come that is better? Do you think Chinese and N Korean threat is a joke?

​@@wolfferoniYeah, and they can just politely ask North Korea to not nuke them if they ever get into a conflict. Get real.

Yeah, men should stop taking advantage of this gender quota system. 75% of people who get advantaged by this system are men in S.Korea

@@user-ff7nz3nj6k I'm a bit confused by your comment, is Y referring to women or men?

Bae In-gyu is not only an excessive feminism, but also a person who says "feminism itself is a mental illness." He is a misogynistic maniac

@@Iamthemiracle777 the woman said.

👍

I'm a women and I agree! The only thing equal between men and women is our rights. But physically, emotionally and psychologically we're unequal.

@@klaudinegarcia8932 women in Korea get 2 years exta preparation by not serving in millitary but Feminist organization support male millitary slavery

So tell us... what rights do women not have that men have?

@elle min Women get paid an equal wage for equal job and equal productivity. If someone works 40 hours a week and someone works 30 hours a week in the same job, the 40 hours will have a higher income for the year. Studies show that men work longer hours, so it makes sense they would have higher incomes in the same job.

@elle min civil services and other exams 2 years extra preparation. Imagine wasting 2 years of life and competing with people with 2 years more experience in job market

THIS💯

I hope Japan & South Korea never let porn proliferate society like it has in the West. I live in the US & I hate how porn has destroyed so much decency. I respect how Japan & South Korea have much tighter laws regarding the production of such filth

Agreed!!!

This! some concrete answers. He just let this guy ramble on for an hour, not giving any concrete examples.

exactly! Its always talk but no concrete actions. Going around dressed up as the joker and bothering protesters isnt doing anything for anyone.

Asking open questions as an interviewr and letting the other person talk so that people watching can make their own mind up about him and his responses is something that is admirable. And quite lacking these days

대한민국에는 가짜뉴스를 이용한 선동이 많았습니다. 페미니즘의 잘못된 행동을 좋게 포장하여 뉴스기사에서 다루고, 페미니스트들은 서로 링크를 공유하여 좋아요를 누르고 동의하는 댓글을 달았습니다. 일반 사람들중 일부는 다수의 동의를 옳음으로 착각하여 동조하기도 하였습니다. 페미니스트들은 조직적으로 선동을 한것이죠. 인터뷰를 해주신 신남성연대의 대표 배인규는 페미니스트에 반대하는 커뮤니티를 형성하여, 페미니스트들의 선동을 파악하고 미리 선점하여 위와 같은 일이 벌어지지 않도록 막고 있습니다. 논리적인 댓글을 통하 대중들에게 진실을 알렸으며, 현재에도 꾸준히 진행중입니다. 인터뷰에서는 나오지 않은 부분들이 많이 있습니다. 분장을 하고 페미니스트의 남성혐오적인 시위를 방해한 것 말고도, 겉으로 드러나는 모든 선동을 막아내고 있습니다. 페미니스트의 선동은 남성에게 불리하고 불평등한 분위기로 이어지게 됩니다. 심지어 법도 바뀝니다. 이외에 진리를 연구하고 피해남성을 돕는 일은 성평화연대가 해내고 있습니다. 남성연대와 성평화연대는 서로 다른 곳에서, 대한민국에 꼭 필요한 일들을 책임지고 있습니다.

Wait! Is this guy him?

I think so cause that guy from hello counsellor has the same name

Go vote, don’t ignore other women vote which do not support feminism.

Agree

im not buying anything you said. sorry!

sadly, this is what a lot of average Korean men from a typical Korean setting are saying

Suuuuure, it sure it's for that and NOT because Feminists vilify the whole Male sex while victimizing the Female Sex in practice, whine all you want, Facts are his side.

@@anonymous05932 And you who stand on the other side and hate men

"In Korea", a lot of men and women wear make up and it is a part of self care in our culture.

Well Im Korean male and do make up. Think 8/10 do make up everyday.

Both korean men and women wear makeup tho

@@thetruth8526 isn’t wearing make up bad for your skin tho?

Absolutely wrong

Can you tell me what's wrong?

첨으로 영어 잘 쓴 한국인 찾음ㅋㅋ b

@@ariellekwong206 you dont have a single clue, what are you to say about korean feminism

In Korea, men are being conscripted while women are not. I did my service in the front line at hwacheon and received less than 200,000won as a monthly wage for 21months when I could earn about 10 times more than that or graduate university during that time. During my service, I was just proud that I was protecting my family and the people but I got out of the army just to find out that Korean feminists disrespect the conscripted soldiers and call them "Goonmoosae" which means spammer. I did not expect as much the respect U.S. army gains and at the same time I could not expect the hate and disrepect Korean feminists show toward Korean men who have sacrificed their most cherishable times. Some students of Ewha Women's University took the handicapped along to the Constitutional Court, demanded repealing the extra points law for those who've been to the army and it is repealed. Extra point for Women and the handicapped was 0.5. Now, women receive 3points and the handicapped receives "0"point. Korean female students get a lot of advantages to become a doctor, lawyer, and a pharmacist due to women's universities. Korean female workers at public enterprises and governement institutions are ensured with certain percentages to high ranking positions. Yet, feminists are asking for a lot more. The Korean Women Network declared that Megalia ,which is a well known radical feminist group as Korea's mainstream feminist group. Korean feminism is not like what you guys think. What they are asking for is not women's rights but money, high positions without competitions with men, and suicide of Korean men.

He is tho? He literally said everything according to facts man

Same way korean Feminist don't get drafted for 2 years and get affirmative action in universities 😂.

Yeah... I was with him up until that point.

This is a prime example of simple comments outright lying to decept the public to lazy to watch the full video... hand picked quotes to paint the guy in the wrong light. Here is my repost. "Looking at some of the comments and unsurprisingly even a few with a large number of thumbs up. You can clearly see how feminism has made people stupid, naive, and willfully ignorant. A lot of the attacks are very general bland attacks that contain no substance that somehow never pinpoint what exactly the guy says wrong. There are also comments that seem to discredit him because he dressed up in certain costumes. EVEN THOUGH he clearly explains why he does that in the interview. Then there are also comments that warp the truth and quote only a portion of what the man says. When the guy mentioned obedience and sacrifice between a man and woman using titanic as an example, the interviewer asked what if the roles were reversed. The man clearly says reversing roles would still be the same, then goes on to give a personal example from his life. Talking about how much his wife suffered and sacrificed when his business failed and how much support he got from his wife. Which did nothing but help revitalize his devotion, love and faith to his wife, true obedience. Feminism has gone from something genuine and righteous, into this man hating women elitism movement, pure misandry. You can scour the comments and see for yourself what feminism has become. Willful and deliberate ignorance, out of pure spite and hatred. Cutting quotes short to fit "their" narrative, never willing to open up their hearts and minds to actually listen to the opposing side. It has become a illness and disease, a mental sickness. Everyone here knows the truth why no feminist representatives came out for the interview. Its because they know deep inside they are wrong and don't want to be crucified in public. Saying they didn't appear due to harassment or attacks is pure excuses, everyone here knows this is a pre-recorded youtube video. Voice warping and mosaics can be done easily. Everyone who can think for themselves know the obvious. The only reason they didn't appear is because they have no confidence in their movement and beliefs. They have no confidence in their actions and don't want to take responsibility for them. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a "brigade" of feminists (shoot if we go the conspiracy route, this could all be a charade done by a 3rd party to create a divide and dissent among the people by parties of interest) whose jobs are to make such dumbs comments to change and warp the publics opinion through deception and taking advantage of peoples short attention spans, or their laziness. Reminds me of what people call the pro-communist chinese spammers. The 50c army. Same difference. Too lazy to watch a 40min video from start to finish but have all the qualifications and judgements to ridicule the man and upvote comments that make you "feel good" or aligns with your ideals/beliefs without listening to the guy? How is that a logical conversation. Its just screaming your ideals at the top of your lungs while you cover your ears. This is the type of people we are trying to have a conversation with, like talking to a wall. No logic, no sense, only hatred. I'm not a anti-feminist nor involved with anything of that category be it on the internet/politically or other. I just see a bunch of people hating on the guy and as someone who watched the video. I do not understand at all what he has said wrong. Seriously everything he has said has been logical, no excuses, no cheap shots, comments made on a base of neutral and mutual respect. Even his wife is there to support him while she is behind the camera. Am I the crazy one? Or has everyone else gone crazy? These are some confusing times we live in. Word of advice, take every comment you see be it reddit or youtube or any social platform with caution and wariness. Much like you guys have heard about fake and/or biased news. The internet, forums and social platforms have also become a battleground of propaganda. Don't think that every comment you see is from an actual individual and always give a thought that there could be a possibility that forces in the background are doing social engineering to change and warp public opinions. Yes, that includes my wall of text as well. Judge it as you will, but make sure its a judgement based on actual self-critical thinking and logic. Not based on emotions, feelings and predisposed prejudice."

The main problem is that radical feminists want a 50% women quota in parliament which puts mediocre women into power and make bias decisions (as they cannot win elections on their own), how does that benefits society and economy?

Classic feminist cherry picking the example. Here's a valid alternative you could have used based on his argument: Him: "we support true gender equality" Also him: "men should sacrifice for women" You see... you lack context and nuance - as all radical feminists do.

위대한 김정은동지께서 조선인민군을 지휘하여 남조선 괴뢰정부를 무찌르고 조선반도통일을 완성하시리라! The great General Kim Jong Un will lead the Korean People’s Army to defeat the South Korean puppet government and complete the reunification of the Korean Peninsula! 金正恩将軍は朝鮮人民軍を率いて韓国の人形政権を打ち負かし、朝鮮半島の統一を完了します！ 伟大的金正恩将军会带领朝鲜人民军击败南朝鲜傀儡政府，完成朝鲜半岛的统一! Pangungunahan ng dakilang Heneral na si Kim Jong Un ang Korean People’s Army para talunin ang papet na pamahalaan ng South Korea at kumpletuhin ang muling pagsasama-sama ng Korean Peninsula! Jenderal besar Kim Jong Un akan memimpin Tentara Rakyat Korea untuk mengalahkan pemerintah boneka Korea Selatan dan menyelesaikan reunifikasi Semenanjung Korea!

@@gyeok4475 ignore this dumb

결국 해결할 사람들은 우리인데 해외랑 무슨 상관 ?

@@user-tt1xm6rs2q 해외도 문제가 많잖아

@@user-tt1xm6rs2q 해외에 공론화 돼서 이슈되면 지네들도 수치심이란 걸 느끼겠지

If you have watched the interview, you would have understood and not commented this. I guess people comment first before understanding...

your comment is cringe

@@nathan-vm4ss butthurt much? lol

@UCXSOVd-Rr3B5YN8adEyUjVA whos gay. video even don't mention homosexuals' -_-

@@kennedya7848 do you know there are increasing number of people dress up as Joker and pull off stunt. To answer your question, I know this guy do it for get public attention, BUT it can't excuse the facts there are many edgelord did same thing.

@@EnigmazGuide Can't say on this person's behalf, but I do know that women having a higher standard on college entrance exams is a thing. There's no need for ignorance here.

@@krystalyan4719 again, if there is a claim, there needs to be proof. Feigning ignorance implies there is one.

@@wixoss9893 proof that something non existent is true? lol

You have been misinformed about pay equality in the West. When researchers adjust for differences in profession, experience, and location, there is no pay difference between men and women. If women did work for 25% less wages, businesses would fill their companies with women as labor costs are a huge portion of a business expense.

I think you are real feminist.

Sadly, the feminism movement in S Korea is all about anti-men, referring every man (from male child to the elderly) to as potential criminal. They say men has to feel shame about themselves at all times for being male.

Nearly all of Men's issues stem from misogyny and the patriarchal system in place

yeah

But how does it makes you feel when this guy sais "women should be obedient to men" ? You respect a remark like that as well?

Gender studies hahah the most shyttt thing i ever heard 6 years old kids know which male or female SMH

Gender studies the most useless cra p I ever heard

@@D0x1511af don’t yuck my yum bro

Again, if you look at the leaders, slogans and activities of almost ALL feminist rallies, you would be proven to be incorrect about “most” wanting true harmony and equality. This whole thing comes with the woke package, and it is radical Marxism disguised in seemingly good intentions.

@@D0x1511af half knowledge is dangerous thing bro , u don't even know what gender studies are . Anyway , what u will expect from ab American

신남성연대와 추총자들이 한국의 페미니스트를 보는 시각 = 전 세계의 상식인이 신남성연대를 마주했을 때의 시각 180도 뒤집힌 사고방식으로 아무리 정상을 보아봤자 뒤집혀 보이겠죠.

자기 아내 폭행 해놓고 남녀평등 이야기 하는 사람한테 뭘 바랄까요...

네 한남은 버리고 외국남자분이랑 잘 사세요

I think that if you use the word "obey", that say a lot. He could give so many example, instead he chose that word. But maybe is a cultural difference. In my family, my very sexist dad at least always say to me that obedience is for slaves, not for indipendent mind.

I think he clearly stated when the interviewer asked could a vise versa situation happen where a women should sacrifice and man should obey. He said yes and gave his situation with his wife as an example.

​@@Ale33810 Why are you quoting the word "obey" as if he said the word and it's not just a translation

@@mikhaelkantor8761 because I can't wright in corean? I'm italian, let me try like this: obbedienza is a very bad word, in any language.

​@@Ale33810 Both are rooted in Latin. Etymologically it makes no sense to have such a hangup over a specific word when you know that word is not even the word being used by the speaker. Argue the greater point rather than specific translations which would just be the translator's discretion

@@unexpectedbunny4816 I'm not an english native speaker

@@unexpectedbunny4816 shut up

the real discrimination is that women are held to lower standards (I remember seeing a news clip saying they are now held to same standard but not sure). this is not good for women and men's view towards this issue.

Women are smarter than men than average and out perform men in the education system. But, I agree with this comment!

​@@tictoc900912 Plus there was this case called "오또케 오또케" where an untrained woman police officer literally struggled to arrest the criminal just simply because she was scared and shouted out that she's a woman so she needed other citizen's help. This may seem like an extreme case, but such things happen quite regularly being held to low such standards

Very recently, I believe last year, there was a Korean game-show on Netflix named "Siren" that had only female policewomen, firewomen, soldiers and stuntwomen competing against each other for a prize doing various physical tasks. All the women who took part were extremely fit and athletic and I believe would have been able to do well at jobs traditionally considered to be 'for men'.

Like Feminists.

So you promote Feminists... Strange.

that wasn't that case. read more before you judge. and how is it terrorizing them when bunch of 'equal' women terrorized streets in groups ignoring the law screaming profanity and hatred towards men?

@Winter Wyvern would have been a whole "no, you" situation

They both could have fit on that door..

@Winter Wyvern it was a display of authors needing something to make people cry

if you flip that, you have to flip other things, and then stuff about the story makes less sense given the gender roles of the day. As for why the man dies and not the woman in a general sense - I don't know, as there are other romance-tragedy films where the woman dies instead. At the end of the day, Cameron wanted the main character to be a woman, so Jack dies since he is not the main character. if it were actually a trope in those kinds of films, then sure, you could the film as an example, but there isnt really a trope concerning the genders for that type of story AFAIK.

Thank you

He was talking about women exactly like you, too narrow minded and cannot seem to overcome your biases.

Nope it is definitely anti radical feminist movement

@paper plane don't expose feminists. U will become misogynist

@paper plane Calling out men's shitty behavior is misandry? It's called justice, sweety.

oh yeah... I'm surprised with comments that think his leo dicaprio reference helped at all. acknowledge inequality and abuse instead of getting triggered by no make up and very few women saying men get triggered by women not looking or trying to look like kpop girl bands.

@@shiwalogo2 Kpop idols and ordinary Korean men are different

the same way feminism movement attracts extremists who hate man.

He is making some valid points. I don't agree with everything he said, at all, but his pov is compelling...to say the least.

Your narrative is precisely what's wrong with identity politics. Truth is supposed to be discussed by anyone, not just particular people born with certain labels. 1+1=2 for anyone.

No he's not. He's elaborating on HIS concept of feminism. He took a water cannon and harassed women that were holding a rally. I think that sais it all. Men like this will not help but only hurt the 'harmony' he speaks of.

@@jyh4662 Maybe your saying is right in an ideal society. But have you thought about If Caucasians are saying “Your works about the racism are too RADICAL, you shouldn't do like that.” to African Americans. It's basically the same word.

@@estherscholtens9718 And feminism is talking about that conventional “harmony” has some wrong parts.

fr

There are no comments like this in many other feminists vids.

No because they are scared to get exposed

They tried to have a civil debate, but the “feminist” side chickened out cuz they knew they’d get outclassed in a logical discussion. They didn’t even answer. So if we get a follow up, it will be after they realize them not shooting an interview with Asian Boss hurts their cause.

No because they have not enough logics to be interviewed for 40 mins.

Could you provide some examples on the most controversial topics and potentially links to further understand the feminism situation in S. Korea? Thank you.

@@wan1234567890 I think her point is simply: most women/feminists don't think that all men should commit suicide.

Thank you to ASIAN BOSS for the interview, and I support CEO Bae In-gyu as a Korean woman. Please save the Republic of Korea stained with this extreme feminism.

@@user-qj5vz7qr8e absolutely wrong

@@ariellekwong206 why?

@@ariellekwong206 feminist do not have any logical reasons to argue with this just like you

@@ariellekwong206 If you want to refute an argument above please tell me why Since a while ago you make comments "That is not true" You argue korean feminism is right and social movement against it is wrong? Ok that being said How would you explain Gender quota system carried out by goverment cause chaos in police organization and make them incompetent in dealing with violent crimes If you investigate the side effect caused by gender quota system radical feminist claim There would be a lot of material

So explain why women were rescued in MUCH higher rate than men?

@@j4240 but men realize this was their choice as well, right? Men decided they get to make the decisions, which came with responsibility. Historically it has largely been men who've decided the roles and systems by which we live. I think men are realizing the gendered system created actually isn't golden and can use updating, but instead of focusing on changing those beliefs and systems it seems to focus is on blaming women for the world men created..

@@gladiatorinsweats "Men decided they get to make the decisions" You act like men went for a shopping and had a "a choice" This is absolutely not true. Yes, historically it has been largely men who decided the roles and systems, because it had to be done that way to SURVIVE. The very Gendered system you are talking about, is done to SURVIVE. Men just did a better job at what has been important in surviving, which is why they took the lead starting from the household, to the society, to the military, to the government, etc. Yeah lets talk about titanic. Why do you think Men died in a much higher rate than women? Where do you think this "ladies first" phenomenon came from? It came from the fact that women are weaker than men (another words, not equal to men) therefore needs to be protected. Men blame women for wanting and talking about equality while they dont REALLY want equality, just the good parts of it. Why do you think hitting women is regarded worse than hitting a man? Men and women will never be equal, we both know it.

Nah. It's a proven fact that being kind to women will lead to jealousy and hate.

men started by not being kind to us first

@@uneenfantdumonde6085 you reap what you sow

@@shah_en_shah goodness at least spell right

@@rinjinnoko my bad

That’s a stereotype. The ones who get the most attention are the most extreme.

@@lornam1142 that perspective is not acceptable. I also want peaceful gender coexistence. However, the hegemony of feminism, which is currently given power, has the idea of resolving the resulting gender inequality as "an imbalance in providing opportunities between both genders." For a long time, the Korean government has adopted this radical feminism as a central theory to redistribute social interests, even at the risk of disadvantages to men, who are currently vested forces, to resolve inequality in Korea. However, those who served a lot of duties and endured inconvenience and expected a fair society to be created learned that the end of patience was branded as potential criminals, and became very angry and hostile. As a result, the presidential candidate was elected, who showed a view to recapture the hegemony of radical feminism. He promised to abolish the ministry dedicated to women, but people(even women either) don't regard it as oppression against women. They are tired of the incompetence, waste, and conflict creation of the government and feminism for a long time.

@@kimhuirae How do you define radical feminism? Because you seem to see as anything mean to help women combat gender inequality.

@@lornam1142 Feminism presupposes that there is an imbalance in the distribution of power between men and women. I would like to inform you in advance that I am not considering all the forms of feminism around the world because there are not many kinds of feminism that I know and I don't have much knowledge. Korea's radical feminism argues that women should be given more opportunities to resolve current gender inequality. However, the oppression of men in the process is considered a social cost that must be accepted to reorganize the already prevalent male-dominant system in society, and even the granting of unbalanced and irrational opportunities is justified for the same reason. Rather than directly criticizing the view of men as potential criminals, sexual crime prevention government organizations say, "This is natural, and men will have to reflect on themselves and be reborn as non-threatening." Radical feminism has the idea that equality in the process cannot change the male superior society given for a long time and requires men to persevere for the resulting gender equality. There are some keywords that we introduce for that. "Tilted playground, mirroring, women's quota system, gender sensitivity, Kim Jiyoung born in 1982". I would like to omit it now because it will be very long to explain the details. These words were not discussed at all in Korea 10 years ago. As Korea's radical feminism gains power in a short period of time without maturity, it is recognized as a product of ideology created.

We have same feminism problem in the west, good you understand it in Korea, didn't the guy won the elections ?

No one listens unless you sit back inside of your room and mock the ones who are trying to make a change. He is sending a message

@@frfrchopin yeah the message that he idolises the joker which is completely unhinged

@@Applesinmybum you still don't get the point.

@@frfrchopin the point that he idolises a fictional serial killer with mental health issues to try and make a point about society? Or if not please explain it to. Me

exactly and that's what people do not understand

Women are talking about the equal opportunity, which Korean women don't have

@@Iamthemiracle777 and I'm saying, if you want equal opportunity then ok but go through THE SAME EXACT physical tests. That's equality. And I'm sorry but we can't go around physical differences.

@@Iamthemiracle777Oh, please I wish that males could have same opportuniti as females in South Korea. Why are women given more chances of education just because they are women,?. Women's college that are in Seoul only lets in female making it alot easier for women to get into those colleges in Seoul(similar to IVY league if it was for US) And only way Korean can be lawyer, chemist, doctor is going into lawschools, med schools -> men have to get twice better score to become lawyer, chemist, doctore just because they are born as man, because half of med, law schools are assigned to Women's college. SO PLEASE, TELL ME ABOUT EDUCATION DISCRIMINATION ON KOREAN MALE FIRST

@@Iamthemiracle777 Why is it only korean women who are compensated for career break with policy "parental leave" while korean men are compensated with nothing after military service for 2 years. Why is it only women who are acknowledged with career break? TELL ME WHY

If me I'll take out the water from the pool, kill the sharks and chop them to make sushi 👍

Feminists dare not dance, but they will guide others to dance

exactly. i’ve noticed most anti feminists are men. it’s not surprising at all because they grew up as men and will never know what it’s like to be a woman. it’s horrifying being a woman. the amount of women sex trafficked and murdered every year is insane. and not enough people are talking about this.

@@minitetourou8744 lol wtf do you mean

@@carmen-fj4uh I mean, feminists don't take risks themselves, but they persuade others to take risks

@김아아 and what consitutional changes occured bcuz of these?

@@lotusrain4102 none

@@maxi0613 exactly.

Are you serious? or are you acting dumb? Look up jail sentence men vs woman.. do women get punishments for false sexual assault accustations when men lives can be ruined? It's a slap on the wrist. If a man accuses another man of a crime its called libel a prison sentence at a minimum. Women in the West are so coddled with a soft form of patriarchy you actually think you're equal to men. You signed up for the draft yet, and don't hit with the stupid trite non-sequitor of no one should be drafted because Ukraine should've show you how Nature works... there is no feminism anymore.. at all. Women are given equal consequences for their terrible behavior. You're just coddled more and given more priviledges than the previous generation of women while men go through the same bs except the top 10-20% of men giggling they get access to women with less responsibilities to have sex with/financial support them.

Yeah right, believing women without evidence has never led to victims.

This is Journalism. It's spelled with a capital J, not capital punishment.

@@rorychivers8769 Don't be silly. This kind of debate is a good thing.

It's incredibly irresponsible to give someone a platform whose entire base is built on misogyny and hate, deceitfully disguised as "equality and harmony". The man who says he is all for equality, says less than 5 minutes later that he believes "all women need to be obedient to men". This guy is a hilariously delusional, it deeply upsets me that so many young, lost, frustrated Korean men eat it all up.

@Winter Wyvern Where does he say men should be obedient to women? Timestamp please. In regards to men having to sacrifice for women; there's a clear difference here in power and hierarchy here, framed in a way to make it seem like his cause is logical or noble. His crystal clear agenda is: women have no power and should obey, and women are at held at the mercy of their husband/boyfriend/father/brother's magnanimity or generosity. CLEARLY this isn't gender equality, but rather toxic, traditional forms of masculinity stemming from generations of misogyny and patriarchy.

​@@AlexClayland1232 Firstly, see 11:19. He says exactly what I quoted: "women need to be obedient to men". Please find where he says "men can also be obedient", it's YOUR responsibility to back up your claims. Misandry is wrong, and fighting against it is a good thing. But I think it's abundantly clear the vast majority of feminists in Korea are NOT misandrists; rather enraged women sick to death of a system of cultural, societal and institutional oppression that has existed since before the dawn of modern society. With regards to conscription; I agree, I am against conscription, PERIOD. The solution isn't to drag women into mandatory conscription but to remove mandatory conscription for men. Women meeting quotas in jobs is a far more complex and nuanced discussion. You'd have to agree that fundamentally, barriers have existed (and still do today) that prevent women from reaching the heights of the career ladder that are afforded to men. Sexism, discrimination and toxic masculinity are all factors that influence whether a CEO position would be given to a man or woman, hypothetically assuming both are 100% equal for the job. EQUALITY is important; but so is EQUITY. We men have to acknowledge that discrimination exists against women in the workplace, and in order to enact long term, systemic change, introducing a system like quotas (not just anyone of course, but women qualified for the job) can be a beneficial thing to ensure we not only make up for the mistakes of the past, but also encourage and foster a long term change in society.

Exactly. These feminists don't want equality in any way. There should be punishment for ra*pists but also punishment for false accusers. Feminism is about a woman having choices in life. A woman who decides to be a career woman is a strong independent woman but a woman who decides to be a housewife has internalised misogyny. Make it make sense.

You guys do know feminists are the ones who actually forced the FBI to recognize rape exists for men, right? Please educate yourselves before complaining all the time. Most often, it's the patriarchal system that shames men for being victims of sexual harassment, and feminists are the proprietors of the movement to dismantle this horrible system for both men and women.

@@rosa578 you mean the law that makes a man spend up to 20 years in jail for rape but a woman will spend 4 years or less for the same crime? Yeah let's thank feminism. Mtcheww.

@@UrAveragePvzGamer Mind citing what this "law" is? There are fifty states in America each with different legislations. I'm just gonna save myself some time and guess you're a rigid anti-feminist without any arguments. Got it.

If you remember much of this video at this time, what points does he make that you consider agreeable? His elaborations on some of the points he makes are fairly uncontroversial imo (eg. "my wife sacrificed for me so I have done things to repay that sacrifice"), but the points as he presents them directly are (eg. "I think women should be subservient to men").