Building A Race-Ready 5.0L Coyote From A Pile Of Parts - Engine Power S8, E10 

just laughed so hard i woke my kids up LOL

@@glennmorris25 I laughed too loud and the animals cracked the shits and left the room.

Coyote is the new gold standard for play and play American V-8's

I saw multiple videos of shops getting 1400+ hp out of the Godzilla just will boost and all stock... nobody ever appreciates how great a Ford engine is to a GM.

@@wiktorjachyra1869 you don't even know what you saw

@@baby-sharkgto4902 what are you on about....

@@bigboreracing356 it wasn't 100% stock, but the architecture and main parts were...like the crank, heads etc.

@@paulcochran5785 theres nothing under the sun that someone hasnt already done, everything is a copy. quit hating

I see ! 😱

They did

Now the MT82 is a problem

Price point is still too wild

Your funny 😆 4 cams 200 chains ⛓ that’s great 😃

No we don't. It's getting as played out as LS builds.

@@AwesomeFinish Let me guess you drive a ram or dodge

@@FirstLast-ig2mg no

@@AwesomeFinish well aside the fact that they are getting close to 4000hp on mod engines.

@@Rob-tl9md they were doing that before coyotes. You do know there are other modular engines than coyotes right?

how do you figure? cost? complexity? for what result?

@@jennifermarshall8218they’re better in every way except cost. They make more power per cube when n/a. They make more power when boosted, safely rev to 8500 rpm. And you can make north 1000 hp on a completely stock engine without it throwing rods through the block. LS can’t do anything better except allow decent power on a welfare budget

You lucky bastard 😂

@@bigboreracing356 good for you

I'm jealous

That’s gonna be fun

you should post some vids on it

Yes Frankie is the real deal💯

The power of properly flowing cylinder heads

And the best thing about that motor is they didn’t need anything except the oil pump gears. The stock motor will make that power and hold together. Also, those heads are a waste of money on the coyote

@@bigboreracing356 Thats true unless its a turbo engine like an EcoBoost engine.

Stay away from 18 and up Coyotes they went to a plasma bore and cast pistons...they don't play tjat well, you won't be seeing over 200k on those they drop like flies 11-17 Coyotes are good though especially 15-17

@@ShawnGilbert1967 You're totally correct brother.

@@bigboreracing356 $3200 to sleeve your own core with the trip...no thanks haha....

Guys love to talk shit about gen3 coyotes but then you have people like David van voris that went 8.20s on a stock Longblock, over 100 passes easy and when they tore it down the damn thing still looked brand new. Even used the stock oil pump gears!

Yea I mean this is literally what everyone does a gen 5 3.0L whipple...even down to the pulleys they used...find it anywhere wish they went into more detail on cam timing and the ecu

@@ShawnGilbert1967 especially the cam timing and install, like a "how to install a camshaft into a Coyote, explained for dummies"...

@@Thraser999 well it's a big deal that a stand alone is controlling VCT on a DOHC Coyote or NOT, did they lock out the cams because the Terminator CANT Control it? They gave up a lot locking it out.... My MS3 Pro Ultimate can control it....I wouldn't need to lock out, unless those cams were nuts huge and oil pressure couldn't work them.... I did like the overview of the new boundary oil pump gears and back plate...but again gave us oil pressure without knowing oil weight... We don't even know what generation block it was...

@@ShawnGilbert1967 I can tell you that they were gen1 heads and a sleeved gen1 or gen2 block

YEESSS!!! I used to work for grooms engines and we rebuilt old and damaged engines if they were able to be saved. Most of the engines that came through were iron blocks and heavy as hell. I was praying for aluminum blocks every day because I had to shot peen the blocks and clean the ports. But the aluminum blocks couldn't be shot peened so I just cleaned the ports.

Supercharge a Ford 300 is that what I just heard?

Spoiler alert. It will be like the Chevy I6. Maxed out around 400. Or the same as a mild small block Chevy or Ford for double the price.

How about a 600hp drag 300 six? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bifbiZGx6Wo.html

Yeah what happened to that build? I thought they were planning on putting a turbo on that beast.

@@bmstylee your spoiler alert is off a bit 🙄

I was thinking the same, it would have taken 8k plus easily, and made a bit more power

They have to stay within the limits of the tensioner for the blower belt. Maybe 8,000 but anymore than that and it will slip.

@@bigboreracing356 Nah, plenty of more powerful coyotes rev way higher with stock stuff. I mean it's not a bad idea to upgrade, but not necessary at this point.

@@AndrewBaker302 except powder oil pump gears. Billet and you’re good for 8500 all day.

Yep, look at the graph, it was still climbing every time. 8500rpm motor that is

Honda wins that game by a landslide in the realm of modified motors. And as far as a stock motor goes, the new Koenigsegg 3 cylinder in the gemera shits on everything, over 5hp per inch

Break in bro...breakin it in...

Max power is never at redline.

@@peterrasmussen68 technically the engine redline is not yet defined there... if you look at the horsepower curve you can see that towards the end it's still increasing steadily because the torque isn't falling off too drastically. You can spin a Coyote to 8500rpm no problem and this I bet would have made peak power at around 7750/8000-ish rpm with just a little rollover after that. Meaning that when you take the thing to the strip with a good old faceplated t56, you dump the clutch at 5000, rev it to 8250 and shift.

@@peterrasmussen68 HP still was climbing. Those engines make hp way past 7500 rpm. Also they had the cams locked out to get full potential they needed to stretch it out.

Please please bring mike galley back

He's doing a different show

@@Airman.. what is the show called?

@@chaseattenborough6483 gunpowder & gasoline / horse power tv

@@Airman.. That’s an OLD show, nothing new about it.

+1 to this idea, sounds like a dream

a Built N/A Gen 3 can reach the 9s+

@@stevencaskey9440 they’ve had fox bodies in the outlaw stock class run 8’s so I know they are fast. They build everything else in all forms on this show and it would be nice to see them try something different on the coyote besides just add boost.

They could have revved this one out to 9500 with that blower but didn't for some reason.

@@SkylineBNR34 with that pulley size they may have risked over speeding the blower and that’s why they didn’t. Outside of this being outside their normal and most engines they build spin to 7500 maybe 8k instead of the coyote that will rev to 9k with off the shelf cams and a cobra jet. Those are really the only two reasons I can think of.

Dam that would be insane

They never push anything near its limits - should anything go wrong a scattered engine doesn't make a good TV show. I know of several local guys - including my dentist - making 1500 horsepower with boosted Coyotes that are still completely street drivable.

@@Motor-City-Mike On the contrary, I think a scattered engine makes a fantastic TV show. Not from just deliberate buffoonery (although that sells too), but pushing the limits and occasionally poking the tiger too hard is both entertaining and educational.

@@JETZcorp i rev my subaru turbo 7500 any day and see 8200 often - ej207 forged internals .

@@ronnieboucherthecrystalcraftsm Does it make 800lb/ft of torque?

I love it

Awesome story.

And then your buddies bought Teslas!!!

@@LJK69187 LMAO-To date we had 4 total converts. And they all say the same thing. We were totally mislead about Ford's. They were told time and again Ford's do not run. Now ask them. And the answer is more than clear. Ci for ci, give me a Ford.

Did they breakup with their boyfriends and start dating women too?

After doing the Ford 300 a Barra would be the perfect follow up. It's just so few us Americans know about the engine it may take time before they actually do it.

I think a lot of young men in this country that work construction are in that same boat. I was also. I’m not young anymore either. Lol

That's the magic of modern metallurgy without unnecessary cost cutting

A lot of the magic comes from those 4 valve heads and VVT (which looks to be locked out on this engine). For the port area they flow very well even stock, nearly 300CFM depending on the year and which version. Combine that with a lightweight valvetrain and you've got a recipe for a lot of power even without boost.

@@177SCmaro 2020 Mustang GT makes 480hp, that's damn good for a baseline 5.0 V8

@@slowstang88 Right on. Also, 5.2L.

1000 hp on the stock Crank stopped being impressive 40 years ago. Damn near EVERYTHING built these days can handle 1000 hp with a stock Crank because they're almost entirely steel cranks whereas they didn't used to be. I have a 2001 2JZ GE from a Lexus that can take 1000 from the factory Crank. That's usually the LAST place an engine failure occurs anymore.

@@bigboreracing356 but its a whole 2.3l bigger than this engine and made 400 more not as impressive still good but dohc engines r stupid good

@@bigboreracing356 1400 on spray thats not boost bet it makes like 1100 or so on boost with no spray im saying u don't need a massive engine to make over a 1000 and u dont need just 2 valves to do it

@@bigboreracing356 i do look at torque its just when people think only ls style is the best when mmmmm its good dont get me wrong but move on please and 7.3 will make a shit ton down low cuz of the size but I also look more at temp if I see it cuz temp plays a big part all a pressure sensor does is sense pressure as u may know and dont tell u how hot the air is so skme of the added pressure is temp I look at it as if 15 psi dont make 2 times the power something is possibly wrong and 988 torque hang on 1330 nm ish I work in nm sorry is good but what I was saying about the whole combo is yes 7.3 making big is only good if a smaller engine dont compare to it if it has been tuned correctly not saying they r not either its like koenigsegg 5.0 tt around 20 psi on average 1200+ and well over 900ib ish or 1100nm ish

@@bigboreracing356 well I dont sound smart I know what I know my new understanding which you have heard a bit of had come from gale banks with his duramax series and as he talks alot about pressure and temp and stuff I have used the same principles on petrol i know petrol and diesel r completely different but the understanding is the same the more cold dence air you have the better the power psi dont mean shit if you have 40 ish c of air the guage just means hello you have x pressure and formula 1 is totally different as u know and I dont talk about something that's not road legal

@@bigboreracing356 1000 HP... and it still wanted more RPM! Was still climbing hard at it's power peak of 7500.

I just looked that up and they seem pretty cool

Ssab and ford 4V? I've never heard of any such monster. Do you have a link?

Ive got a ford v4 2lt from a capri, it has alot of torque especially with free flow..

@@robertelee6712 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Taunus_V4_engine then sabb picked them up to 240 hp in a smaller for factor than a i4

Yep, the precursor to the 2.8L V6. I'm old, and I've only seen one in my life.

Is that a joke? i sure hope it is. I love the coyote, but let's not kid ourselves into thinking that they are anywhere near as reliable as an LS. I personally can't remember the last time any LS design was notorious for cracking ring landings with just a measly extra 200hp over stock. And don't try to bring up lifter failures, that was an issue that only appeared on truck motors due to the "displacement on demand" architecture that was never once in the history of GM, implemented on any of the actual "LS" part code engines

Im not opposed to them LOL

And, I'm not impressed.

Yes because the new guy hasn't heard them yet.

Made me laugh

@@walkerforsyth6221 I highly doubt they are worried about impressing you.

The ls whoops that things ass.

@@HioSSilver1999 nah

@@Ryan-dc4ug it does.

@@HioSSilver1999 no it doesn’t….not even close🤦‍♂️

@@HioSSilver1999 you see what we see here is an actual coyote build with heads/cam to go along with thee boost. This one was not limited too only so much $ budget build. Take away the budget of the coyote and do the same stuff to them coyote beats the shit out of an ls every time.

If it's a gutted race truck yes, otherwise a built 460 would be my choice for a truck

Re the boost all engines do respond. If a 200hp engine gets one atmosphere (14.7PSI) of boost it will make ~ 400hp. If the same engine gets 7-8PSI it'll make you guessed it ~ 300HP. Thing is when an engine is good the boost numbers tend to be more power for similar boost or the same turbo (if so equipped) makes the same power on less boost. Superchargers can't compensate for elevation gain like turbos can, and for the same boost they often make less power because of the pumping loss of the blower. I like blowers because they're simpler installation in some respects but they are always turning so they always consume more fuel. Turbos off boost and the motor almost becomes NA and when the boost comes on the pumping loss for the same power is less than a supercharger. Re OHC That's not necessarily the advantage but what you say is the theory of it esp in the past. The advantage is the design sometimes allows better valve placement and size if two valve without the complex geometry. A Gen 2 426 Hemi is an of example of complex geometry but the the way Chrysler designed the rocker arms they were pretty good up to about .570" valve lift. The other really critical thing that OHC or DOHC can allow is better port placement and design. Idiot pushrods often bracket the ports severely limiting the size and shape. Some engines like Ford Tunnel Port the pushrods go in the intake ports. The two valve Ford 427 SOHC of the 1960s was a way around that port limitation. Lastly, often it depends on the combustion chamber design you want. For four valve per cylinder DOHC is a no brainer.

What you mean is OHC or overhead cam OHV is Over Head Valve I liked the old flatheads but things go forward!

@@saludahead I did...thank you for the correction :)

@@ThePaulv12 "Re the boost all engines do respond. If a 200hp engine gets one atmosphere (14.7PSI) of boost it will make ~ 400hp. If the same engine gets 7-8PSI it'll make you guessed it ~ 300HP. " Completely and utterly incorrect, and anyone that knows how to read a compressor map will instantly know why. Boost pressure is not what makes power, my guy, it's mass airflow.

Pushrod motor has nothing to do with allowing valve float. That is something any stock valvetrain without enough valve spring will do

Ya!! no shit!!

You know its tight enough when you have to drill a hole down in the sheered fasteners and insert a heli-coil.

@@giantpune Absolutely. What's better than one bolt holding the thing down? Two bolts! One inside the other. Job done. The path to true wisdom comes in never admitting it was you, and never having to undo the mess further down the line.

Agreed. It’s the biggest flaw of this engine.

@@TheRepublicHasBeenLost they've shown before that some engines just sit and others are torn down and parts are put into new builds for the show. Not sure if they sell some stuff.

Some builds are owned by someone that is paying to get them built for them

Accurate comment

@@bigboreracing356 it’s okay old fella

@@nox_chan you're a clown im 35 wtf are you even on? Not even mention my lil racin partners that are in their 20's that watch this you're just biased and the typical nowaday kid

I'm old enough to fart dust and I like the newer stuff just fine.

Boomers BTFO

Please do, I volunteer my foxbody for it!

@@4eyefoxbodyfanclub625 that would be sweet i love fox body mustangs they were always my favorite the hatch backs my aunt had an 81 capri 5.0 with gt trim i loved that car

They already put that engine in a 70 Mach 1 Mustang.

Because I'm not a slave to a brand. Because there's 5 x's more opinions for making power with a GEN3+ SBC. Because LS is more efficient than Coyote at everything other than HP per displacement, and possibly MPG's, but they're close in MPG's. Because making big N/A is cool. Because LS without AFM is likely more reliable. BTW I own an 03 Cobra, 03 Lightning, 88 GT, 13 Taurus, and a 19 SS 1LE, and recently got rid of my old 02 SS so I'm a fan of both brands and buy both. One thing that's annoying and hilarious at the same time is these kinds of channels always go all out and do these badass builds every time they build a Ford regardless of whether it's some old Windsor based SBF or a modern Coyote or Modular build, but then almost everytime they do a LS build it's a, "we're doing a budget LS build" video where they're using some butt f'in, running, high mileage, GEN3 5.3L longblock that they paid $500 for at a junk yard, and they'll throw some decent at best heads on it, with an off the self cam, some bolt ons and an aftermarket intake that they're scared to port, and then be content with sub-500 HP because it was cheap to build. First of all F a 5.3L unless you intend to boost. If you're trying to showcase what a 2V engine platform can do then you need to be working with 4"+ bore diameters. How about this. Let's start with a GEN4 aluminum LS block, get it re-sleeved with some 4.2" bores, run a 4.25" stroke, use heads that put any 4V Ford head to shame in the CFM's they flow, run a badass intake setup, huge headers, etc. Then we can talk about how junk LS is. Hell you can get well over 600 WHP with a stock bottomend, GEN5 LT1 without a poweradder, and I doubt a LS3 is too far off that as well. Several shops have done it and some do it regularly. How many OEM shortblock Coyotes are making 620+ WHP without boost or a shot? And BTW I'm not hating on Coyote. Coyotes are some badass engines. I would own one. But Coyote fanboys are either stupid or they're full of chit. They're worse than LS1 fans were back in the early 2,000's and that's saying something. At least LS1's were legitimately beating up on N/A 4.6L Modulars. (especially the 2V Modulars) Coyote fans think they just dominate LS/LT and that's a bunch of BS. They're both very competitive with one another, but go about it differently. The biggest advantage for the GEN2/GEN3 Coyote is from the factory they're built strong enough to support more power when using FI than your factory cast rod/piston GEN4/GEN5 SBC engines. Props to Ford for stepping up in this area because before Coyote that definitely wasn't the case with your N/A 4.6L/5.4L engines. Also the LT4 was such a half-step by GM. Even Trinity which predated it was noticeably better for a factory SC'ed engine. I would rather have a LS9 than a LT4 with it's AFM hardware, inefficient blower, and less than great internals. The LT5 is what the LT4 should of been. Still GEN3 Coyote was basically implemented so quickly to stop the hurt that the LT1 cars where putting on the early S550's. The reality is GEN5 LT doesn't make less power than GEN3 Coyote. In Camaro the LT1 makes like 5 less HP and 35 more lb-ft and it's a detuned engine so that C7 would have the HP advantage. The 480 HP in the Bullitt and Mach 1 is less than the 495 HP the LT2 makes which is basically nothing more than a LT1 with a more efficient intake/TB setup (kind of like it is with the 480 HP Coyotes compared to the 460 HP Coyotes) and possibly some revised cam spec's. Pretty sure the compression, heads, etc is the same between the two engines. Personally I'd rather run a LS in a Foxbody than a Coyote. It stays true what what the car came factory with and helps preserve the charms of the torquey, N/A OHV SB in a lightweight Foxbody. Plus a compact LS just sits so well in a large Foxbody engine bay. I'd also rather run a 8.8" or a 9" in a Fbody than a 12 bolt or a heavy ass Dana 60. Who cares if my Fbody has a Ford rearend? If GM would of put a good/strong rearend in the car then people wouldn't have to worry about it.

@@JROC734 Oh is that all?

Or just twin turbo a BBC and make 2600

@@ShawnGilbert1967 if only it was that easy lol.

@@bigboreracing356 I had an F2 procharged home build BBC in my 67 Camaro but I downgraded to a F1A-94, its more efficient in the psi range I run on the street and I only need 8 to 12 rib belt vs cog....its stock 52 year old block...I mean for real stock not literally $4000 worth of sleeved ARP goodness and I know because I have 988 mile gen 3 coyote core I've called all over trying to get sleeved its super expensive. I could literally buy a Dart big M block good for out to 632ci AND the Pistons for the cost of sleeving a Coyote........ The gen 3 uses a paper thing plasma bore that makes it a paper weight with slightest scratch and then stuff them with cast pistons that can't match the thermal expansion of the bore they are in....gen 2 coyote is good...gen 3 on pump 93 not so much...e85 keeps them cool and the pistons a bit more stable.... Good ideas but terrible execution I miss it but it was like a heavy weight with a glass jaw it could knock you out but couldn't take a punch....my for real stock block bbc has been holding 15psi on 93 for 6 or 7 years now....lol and for those that don't know that's well over 1000hp....

@@bigboreracing356 I’ll still take an LS over these overly complicated/Mega Expensive pieces of trash! Can make more HP, with a good bit more torque, for a LOT Less Money! Ford stuff is just too expensive to build. That’s why you see so many Mustangs with LS Swaps! How many Camaro’s have you seen with a Coyote Swapped Engine? 😂 Don’t worry, I’ll wait... 😜😂🤣

@@bigboreracing356 Oh lord... 🤦‍♂️ A racer that’s too lazy to do a little work? Because we all know that when you own race cars, you’re gonna have to bend, lean, squat, and reach among many other movements to work on them. So what’s the issue? Besides, They are out there everywhere Sir! Also, many guys run the older Generation Camaro’s where that wouldn’t be an issue anyhow! Really the 4th Gen was the only one that was any trouble, But if that would keep you from owning one, You aren’t much of a Racer, or a mechanic... JMO 🤷‍♂️🙄🤦‍♂️

Belt slip will hit it at about 8,000.