Checkmate - Russia's Newest Stealth Fighter 

🤣🤣🤣

Don't need more then 5 when they got more nukes then the USA. Think about that, also they got Hyper-sonic missiles which the USA can't make. The USA makes junk and has done for 70 years think about WW2 just make it cheap and nasty, were the Russians makes fast planes and make em out of Steel ie MIG25/31. When was the last time the US actually won a war, Korea ===Draw (still technically going) , Vietnam ==Lost, Iraq (gulf 1) Saddam still was in power so I call that loss, Iraq 2 Well that dragged out to be costly and just nothing, Afghanistan well 20 years and Yanks went home so that is a loss. Now Putin ignores the USA because its weak, they(USA) is full of empowered gender fluid types with purple hair running the show.

And yet, we're still so powerful, we let a puppet lead our country.

Exactly, Russian design is up to par, their budget is tiny

@@ntal5859 ooh looks like the Russian trolls are getting angry. Pretty sure America was able to land a man on the moon; a technological feat the USSR was never able to achieve. Also, you guys lost in afganistan too. It’s sad when you have to compare you enemies to he most vulnerable in society to feel powerful. But let’s be real, if you are dick-measuring nuke stockpiles you have a very stunted understanding of geopolitics.

I'd rather never see this thing in the air.

Think you fail to realise that it is only helping China and doesnt make a difference to Putin or russia as many none European countries will continue to boost the Russian economy and China's by proxy 🤷‍♂️

Yah, doubtful even more than handful of this so called "Checkmate" actually get built at this point. Sourcing tech components is gonna be a lot tougher with sanctions in place, let alone financing them.

Did North Koreas much smaller economy collapsed?

@@julwiezdeghorz5089 No but at the end of the day “their still just little North Korea” enough said 😏

Please let's stop giving us Janus-faced reporting on the subject of a Russian Jetfighter referred to as the “CHECKMATE” that is supported to be equivalent to the American jet fighter the “F-35”. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Truth, The 'CHECKMATE” Russian proposed 6th generation fighter jet is just a proposal still on paper, and the pictures of the plane are enhanced images of a “WOODEN” mach up of what the Jet is may look like whenever it may be built, and experts say that won't be for another ten years before that happens. Let's get it right next time.

it was stealthy untill the serbs took some down

@@kawkaw8623 By 1999 the F117A was based on technology so outdated the wreck wasn't considered worthwhile to bomb to prevent capture. It was on airshow circuits. But sure, Serbia stronk memes, knock yourself out.

@@kawkaw8623 Russia is only good on paper, already 17,000 dead. More than Americans dead in 20 years of occupying iraq and Afghanistan. The entire Russian nation is garbage.

@@NikovK i mean the main cause of them getting shot down was cause the americans used the same flight pattern in all bombing runs

You can't see it... it's stealth ;-)

Let me clarify, it's a smart move by Russia, just don't inflate it to be anything more than it actually is at the moment.

Also, since Putin has decided to be an absolute idiot and invade Ukraine, the chances of the Su-75 being anything more than vaporware are so small as to be indistinguishable from ZERO. F-35s anyone?

Russia's best move would be to upgrade the FoxBat. They already have 110 in service. 2nd highest ceiling rate next to the SR 71. During trial it reached a speed of Mach 3.2! If they were to add upgraded state-of-the-art Avionics and weapons they'd be better off then building the checkmate. At least they would have 110, and not 5 prototypes like every other project they come up with! They simply don't have the funding.

True, stealth is a rich mans game and Russia is poor...

@@jonbarad1 It's worse than that. As the Invasion of Ukraine has proved to everyone, corruption is severe and widespread in Russia. So what they do spend on their military, a very significant amount is diverted into the pockets of corrupt officials before it can actually do anything.

Did ya not see Putin standing there in person presenting it? It’s not even that impressive compared to black world air/spacecraft that both sides actually have, this is what you’re allowed to know about. Imagine what stays classified, I’ve seen a silently hovering black triangle spacecraft before, it’s like Ben Rich from the Skunkworks said “if you’ve seen tech in Star Wars or Star Trek we’ve either done it, did it better, or said it wasn’t worth doing”…

You do realise stealth planes kind of all look similar because there stealth... And Russia knows how to build planes .... Why this is a bit of propaganda if you were in an f35 snd your long range missles miss and you suddenly realise your in a dogfight with an su35 your going to shit yourself

@@MegaRyan123456 ha. You said miss.

@@HubertofLiege well missles do miss and planes have countermeasures .. So its a liekly scenario even at 100km range this gives the person that just fired his missle very little time to work out his next move if the plane he was attacking countermeasures work ... Also the other plane would know the f35 is there once the f35 attempts to radar lock to fire a missle... So your stealth somewhat becomes less effective

@@MegaRyan123456 Any pilot that underestimates Fat Amy's tech advantages won't live to regret doing so. I suggest you learn a tad more about both Fat Amy and aerial combat. Fat Amy is a strike fighter, designed to kill high value air defense sites. She's only supposed to defend herself while doing her job. Two Su35s were taken out by an out of date MiG-29 today and you're going around crowing about the Su-35's abilities against Fat Amy? kek

😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣 made my day,

moon base LOl

and a working economy:)))

@@DerDop Ouch..nice one

they also have several tanks towed by Ukranian farmers.

Su-75 may come around in time when the US starts testing its new 4th gen complement to F-35 as the Joint Strike Fighter project failed to be an F-16 replacement due to high cost, Russians are more likely to succeed by not following beyond good enough concept that is necessary to keep in mind in order to be operable in sufficient numbers.. It's still plausible that the US chooses to complement the F-35 with a new production of more upgraded existing 4th gens (F-15,16,18) but there are already available concept arts of the upcoming F-36 "Kingsnake" delta wing single engine jet fighter under development to chase lost civilian Cessnas in forbidden US air space instead of "overqualified" F-35 which would likely still lose at least in nowadays less likely close range dogfight against upcoming Russian light to medium weight thrust vectoring capable 5th gen jet. Contrary to popular belief, F-35 is not cutting edge because it has to be mass produced and export friendly, unlike F/A-22 which is forbidden to export by the US law, but F-35 is still a better multirole solution than anything competition offers while currently still decent for air dominance, not that there is much of 5th gen multirole competition until the arrival of next-gen European fighters anyway as Russia/China heavy jets are air dominance/anti-shipping oriented, so not exactly super useful for low-intensity conflicts as we got in the 21st century...

American exceptionalism and its consequences have been a disaster for the warfare community

@@WeAreSoBackBros how is that a reply to what I said?

Good 1

@@icantseethis Americans (typically latinx too for some reason) came out of the woodwork to slander Russians in every video now that CNN told them too. While the rest of us that have always had this interest in warfare have to watch all your cringe takes on these videos

Ya know, the Su 35 is actually more expensive per unit than an F 35, so you never know, it might actually be more expensive after all and still be shit

@@totalnerd5674 I'm not surprised. The R&D and production costs for the F-35 are spread out among all the JSF participants. The Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen-E and F-15EX are all more expensive per unit at 85-100 million each. Heck even the older F-16 and Super Hornet aren't THAT much cheaper, at roughly 65-75 million each. And those older aircraft are just getting more expensive to operate and maintain. Oh yeah, I should add that the production unit cost for the F-35 is 78 million.

@@MrMontanaNights also depends on the variant.

@@kevinfreeman3098 True, I quoted for the Air Force's "A" variant. The B and C ones are like 20 million more if I recall correctly. Still.. not too bad for a state of the art combat aircraft. That puts the B and C variants just a little more than the Saab Gripen.

@@totalnerd5674 su 35 is a air superiority fighter with some ground attack abilty the f35 does not know what it is ...

Kid: Mommy I wanna f 35 Mother: we have f-35 at home This

Probably made from some plastic but even then, the radar signature is big.

It will be cheap because instead of plane they just need to fill pockets of all corrupted politicians and oligarchs... The plane will obviously never be...

Cheaper than F-35. US costs, labor, logistics, corruption much higher

@@AccordGTR the f-35 is more expensive because it actually exists. More on paper projects from Russia.

The mig 29 at the time of its release was way ahead of f16 and 18s in maneuvering, missile tech and overall speed especially the real soviet versions.

@@jeffreyprezalar220 Missile tech has nothing to do with the aircraft, and to the other point: A Mig-29 has never shot down a single aircraft ever, and has a very small fuel tank. And nowadays its not even a comparison

@@jeffreyprezalar220 f16 is the most maneuverable jet on the planet capable of 12g turns. Also has better avionics and missile systems. F16 and f15s have smoked mig 29 and su27 in combat every time.

Please let's stop giving us Janus-faced reporting on the subject of a Russian Jetfighter referred to as the “CHECKMATE” that is supported to be equivalent to the American jet fighter the “F-35”. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental. Truth, The 'CHECKMATE” Russian proposed 6th generation fighter jet is just a proposal still on paper, and the pictures of the plane are enhanced images of a “WOODEN” mach up of what the Jet is may look like whenever it may be built, and experts say that won't be for another ten years before that happens. Let's get it right next time.

@@justinlance4174 lmao 12 g turns? Is that why the airframe is only rated for -3/+9? I love the F-16 but it is definitely not the most maneuverable aircraft in the world, just extremely capable.

Aged very poorly, cope.

@@ruskifoxrf9167 Russia is calling conscription of its civilian population and thousands of Russian citizens are fleeing the country as we speak. Ukraine is breaking Russian lines and Putin has been showing signs of breaking. Yeah that economy is indeed going to bust. The current invasion in Ukraine is sure going badly. Yeah the Checkmate fighter will likely never see the light of day as a fighter. In Russia at least So sorry but I don't have to take the words of a little russian fox..

The stealth fighter is SO advanced, that you can't see a single Russian soldier around Kiev! Wow.

Common misconception.. it has a small cross section to narrow wave target acquisition RADARs. It is still very trackable with broad waveform RADAR platforms, albeit at a reduced distance. An AWACS or flight control RADAR has no problem tracking it or the 22 at all for the most part. The problem is those RADARs are imprecise and are not good enough to guide weapons. Also have to remember the 22 and 35 are front aspect stealth only, if looking at them any other way, they are very easy to lock on to. .. well the 35 is, the 22 has a better overall stealth employment. Other than the frontal plane, the aircraft would be closer to "reduced Signature" than stealth. The only true all aspect stealth aircraft the US currently employs is the B-2 and even that is only at standoff ranges, if it gets too close that broad underside will light up targeting RADARs like a Christmas tree.

@@Grisbane always remember you tend to overestimate your relative expertise

@@Grisbane good info if true, thanks for sharing

@@ericvantassell6809 May be he's Russian.

Dude..... seriously? You buy that CIA propaganda bullshit? Come on. Stop.

@@betanaga7860 heard he comes from a country called the Principality of Belka

They did, but vladi boi shit himself, and released the shitbags abouve me. Yeah get pounded Ivan's!

Ghost of Kiev, much like my skills in CoD, both remains in games only 🤣😆😆🇷🇺

@@miamijules2149 boo hoo pal, I don't care!

Yup same problems with all those programs. They haven't been built in any meaningful numbers. They only managed to deliver about 20 T-14 Armata's by the end of 2021, and there's like 4 production versions of the SU-57 (and 10 test aircraft).

You forgot the unlimited range missile that crashed after a few miles.

@@DroneStrike1776 not familiar with those other than the nuclear powered one that crashed and they tried to hide It.

That has been the MO for ALL Soviet or Russian equipment.

They actually never said that ... The west saw the plane and thought that ... The plane was only ever designed and intended as a fast interceptor... The west saw it and made up ideas in there own head

@@MegaRyan123456 I disagree sir, "The West did not make those ideas up in their collective minds". Russian aircraft have lagged behind "The West's" aircraft by a margin of two to three decades since WWII. Mig 29 and Su 27 entered service in the early to mid nineteen eighties over a decade plus some after "The West" had F15 and F16 in service. The YF 22 and YF 23 programs Fourth generation aircraft were in development and flight testing already by 1990 before the Soviet union dissolved. The "Checkmate" aircraft recently revealed and hyped up by Russia is lackluster compared to the 30 year old American airframe design that new Checkmate was engineered to compare and counter. Maybe Russia can park the Checkmate where that Space Shuttle knockoff languishes when it fails.

@@willardhunghimself there space shuttle is not a knock off its a space shuttle there all going to look the same ... Its a very different vehicle to the American space shuttle.. It just happeneds that vehicles made to do a similar job kind of look the same ...

@@MegaRyan123456 Yo the Buran is a Copy cat of the STS bud make no mistake it is a Copy Cat Buran shows up almost ten years after STS 5 in 1981 the first operational service flight, but Enterprise STS1 was built in the 70s . I know what your trying to say bud but your wrong homie. My entire family worked in Aerospace and Military Aircraft. My Grandfather was a Lead Flight line mechanic for Convair, Rockwell International, and Boeing' Rocket Dyne Division. I have sat in in the pilots seat of two STS. . My point is this dude Russian aircraft are always decades behind US literally., Buran shows up ten years after STS makes 1 L E O with 2 orbits and that's all, the Tupolev Tu160 in 1981a Copy of the B1A that flew in 1975, The Tu 144 is just a Concord rip off it came out after Concord, and the list goes on man. Shit shows up later, Touted as superior, and always ends being a inferior knock off of a pre existing aircraft.

its also perfect in the sights of even outdated russian aircraft

Dont even think its manueverable

But I will say good advertising for it, they win that one lol

Su57/Su35 moment

Yes as it’s towed by tractor, wonder how many Hp it adds to it, image real tight turns, & has a reverse Lol 😎🇨🇦

@Z Ham And CGI

Panicked. Almost had a cau over that one.

😐And who did they choose to have a cold war with? _The World_ . I don't know if you're a fan of history or not, but the more I hear about this "Putin", the less I care for him...

@@snickle1980 he’s a real jerk

@@snickle1980 I've always loved history. The important part, I've been able to learn new things that I didn't know, and do the same for others. Putin's problem- he's still KGB. Like some U.S. Marines, it never left him. He may be picking the most valuable assets to bring back into a new USSR. I've never trusted a word he's ever said. Cool as a cucumber. He could beat any polygraph test in the world. Been in power way too long.

wow, you really seethe whenever you see anything Russian, it's hilarious.

@@TheBinaryHappiness Assume much? I'm not worried about Russia's stealth fighters. I'm relatively sure that the US has the ability to track stealth fighters as easy as you please, given that they've been developing stealth aircraft for decades now.

If it leaves the simulations it will probably end up like another mig 21 With a 3 losses for every 1 aircraft shot down

Well,this didn't age well

All the money already bought a Yatch

Because they both play catch up, stealing info and ideas. It's hilarious when you hear them spout crap about being superior. Nevermind all they will be able to make soon is ww1 style by-planes.

Art initiating life.

Is it rhetorical, or ignorant? I mean the answer is obvious, theres only a few ways to make a proper airplane.

That's very ignorant to say. Firstly obviously, there's only a few ways to make a proper airplane. Secondly, Russians have made fair share of real innovative contributions to Fighter aircrafts industry. Chinese initially started with reverse engineering Russian aircrafts but now they have learned and improved a lot, to the point that they are now producing their own designs

Because they're scavengers at heart.

Your sir, are my new hero. :-)

it's intentional. the more you focus on stealth capability, the more $$$ you will have to pay which defeats purpose of a massively affordable fighter and real world practicality. Think of it this way: The difference of detection range(front aspect) between 0.01m2 RCS and 0.001m2 RCS is only a measly 10NM with L-band radars and 25 NM with 0.0001m2 which means you don't really get much for what you pay for as you make the RCS of an aircraft smaller. It's much cheaper and smarter to develop stand off capability with longer range munitions than spend stupid amounts of money on diminishing returns. Higher stealth performance also requires more maintenance cost and hours because RAM is notorious for degrading quickly as you increase flight envelope. For example the F-22 requires a minimum of 30 hours of maintenance for every hour of flight time so it stands that potential customers would want a fighter that they can operate more in the air than spend in the hangar.

Those exact shape flaws also exist in F-35. In fact, if you simulate RCS on both mid and long wave for F-35 vs J-31, you'll see that J-31 is pretty much a corrected version with F-35's worst RCS flaws ironed out. The problem with this is, it didn't correct these flaws. It wasn't as if Lockheed Martin didn't realize, but rather that they had no choice, given the requirements sat for them. We don't know the requirements sat for the Russian project, but vertical takeoff probably isn't one of them, nor is cramming in entire specialized ecm suite or command and control model while maintaining single engline configuration, resulting in an overweight underpowered potato. No excuse, unless this is just a hoax meant to waste our tax dollars on extra spending to counter it.

@@georgedang449 so a possible 2020's fox-bat?

@@wiker680 It's possible. Russia's limited military spending can be better spent elsewhere. Even today, they don't have proper stealth coating. You'd think they wouldn't divert resources from that to a whole new plane that, too, won't have coating to use. Then there's the problem with single engine configuration. Developing the new large single engine will take extra, when 2 existing engine will do. A lot of this doesn't make sense. It's too similar to the F-35 that they don't need and can't afford.

damn must be some kind of futuristic tech

They have cloaking technology. The true stealth. Not radar evading or Low radar technology used by the US.

@@estellemelodimitchell8259 ahahahahaha

Uuh, we havent still seen it around day 60 ish

i dont think they would be using these prototypes into war, pretty sure the su-57 hasnt even been used in action at all

If it actually becomes a real thing, then I hope NATO will adopt the codename r/NonCredibleDefense has given it. The Su-75 Femboy

LMAO

“Next decade” a plan is the least of stuff that can go wrong

@@imperialpilot2164 well, until now it's 700 F 35 already in NATO

That's optimistic of you to think Russia will have any kind of military left by the next decade

Only 60 billion military budget

This has already won all internet combat missions

Probably just gonna put some crappy avionics to make it cheaper and call it a day

The series takes inspiration from modern aircraft. There are plenty of valkyries outside of the anime series like the A-6 Intruder and the J20.

Veritechs are a long way off I think

I think the intake is s-shaped laterally to allow for the 2 side missile doors.

@@generalrendar7290 It's S shaped for sure to hide the engine internals from radar returns and lower the frontal IR signature.

@@SWRaptor1 The shape helps maintain proper airflow to the inlet. The inside of an f-16 intake is similar and the variable ramps on the f-15 perform the same function.

Its a new version of the YF-23. Look that up. They contracted with foreign countries to help them build their jets, after losing the contract to the F-35.

@@kylecarnine537 The YF-23 is... Very far different in design, Twin Engines, extremely low profile, centerline fuselage weapon bays, Diamond Wings. The Checkmate is most similar to the X-32 Prototype (Albeit sleeker and less obese.)

@@justarette133 I’m not the sharpest blade in the knife 🔪 box!😂

@@kylecarnine537 I’m not the sharpest tool in daddy’s tool box. From a non aircraft type of person, it definitely says copy cat all over it.

Also aged poorly

Good, I'm not the only one who thinks that...

Yep it’s the x32 and the x23 had a baby and made that thing. I think they stole the wrong usb files

as long as it takes one QAAM or SASM im fine with not knowing

Plus, its already won all internet engagements aganist NATO

Keyword according to russia

For me, it would be like easy bots you find in multiplayer games.. It's just that, could it even keep up with the ever-changing tactics of the battlefield? (No constant moves)

You people speak as if you are veterans in air combat

It’s faster than the F-35 but as the USAF found with the F-22, flying above Mach 1.4 significantly increases the thermal signature of the aircraft which makes it much easier to spot for IR weapons. This is why they reduced the top speed of the F-22 and made it so that the F-35 wouldn’t go as fast either.

@@matijatoskovic5666 what did he say that is false?

Noticed that too

F-22 is being retired in 2030 because F-35 is more capable and can establish air superiority on its own. And once air superiority is established, specialized aircraft like the F-22 are relatively useless as the majority of the war becomes ground attack and CAS.

@@moist_ointment No it's getting retired because the USAF are developing NGAD and the USN are developing F/A-XX

America is famous for not attacking innocent people and countries

Ngl, Nuptune ASM do be bussin

A 10 is a great ground attack aircraft but dog fighting isn't its strong point.... F-16 on the other hand or anything else after that is another issue but honestly Russia hasn't had aircraft capable of competing with the best of the USAF since Vietnam and in my opinion they still won't after the "Checkmate" is released.

F22 raptor is still the baddest plane in the sky.

@ TONY Malloy I agree ☝🏻 but was making a joke 🇺🇸😎😂😂😂😂🍻🍻🍻 thanks & cheers ! “ the Conrad’s are a bunch of drunks n my point was our smaller assets could handle em 🙄😊

The Boeing and Airbus jets will have to land very soon. If they are leased they have to be returned and if not they will stop operating very fast anyway because they need constant supply of replacement parts and maintenance that only the original companies can provide.

same as the F-35 essentially

4+

ah yes the "smiling shit"

Yeah, I was thinking of that too.

" :D " plane

The f35 does not have an quantum computer 🤣 You could not even fit a useful one in the airframe with all the cooling requirements a quantum processor needs The processors inside a f35 will be 10 year old military rated arm or x86 processors made for reliability and mission critical applications Try not to be a bullshit artist 🤣

@@MegaRyan123456 I don’t know you, but if you say you deal in bullshit, I suppose I must believe you, yes? I saw it in the airplane. I read the label, it said, “D-wave.” I researched it, and not only has the Pentagon been using them, they must be impressed, because they are buying the D-wave 2, that is set to come out, if not already. D-wave has published its research in scientific periodicals. NASA,Google, and another large space program are all making purchases. Just Google D-wave. There is so much to the F35, that other countries posing and claiming any equivalence to the F35 is laughable.

@@tobyihli9470 the dwave 2 is not fitted to the plane mate its used in software validation its got nothing to do with the plane itself

@@tobyihli9470 you a dwave 2 is a massive mainframe style quantum supercomputer 🤣

@@tobyihli9470 so your telling me you just looked inside an f35 and saw something labelled dwave 🤣

Well, they clearly pay very close attention to American engineering.

@@haidengeary8277 >> Yes, it does look like a combination of the F-35 and a less ugly X-32!

I mean, yeah Must admit that some of them are really aesthetically pleasing. But still F16 is best bae

I think being functional is a more important criteria than being pretty.

@@inso80 We are talking about the looks tho, none of us are engineers or fighter pilots

Well they'd probably think it's better than having no jets.

@@marrqi7wini54 well. I can’t say i blame them

@far left louis neither does the checkmate 😂

@far left louis its a wood model, with lights.

@far left louis 🤣🤣

Good one.

well thats because the jet isn't in service

@@fuckedlaptop364 Not in service and only flys on paper are two totally different things lmao

@@bradjohnson2693 I'm sure its solid metal, however they will probably just build 2 and do an airshow propaganda just like the Su-57, wich at least is in service, even if its just 5 of them or so, but can't deny its a beauty, the Su-57 of course, don't like much the 75, or maybe I do

@@fuckedlaptop364 Stand corrected the one they have displayed at the airshow is guess what- plywood

Russia is quite poor. And the money they have from oil and gas goes to the elite. The army is great in numbers but their equipment is shit. The size of their economy is that of Belgium and Netherlands combined. So yes, this is all smoke and mirrors. (and always have been)

The orcs retreated

Hahaha EXACTLY!!! They’re playing PlayStation, while we’re playing PS5. Checkmate 🤪🤪

@@Dietzbeatz funny how the playstation works, after all these years.

@@snikrepak Yeah but the ps5 does EVERYTHING the PlayStation does, BETTER. You go ahead and keep playing in 480p.

Throw in some Pink Floyd, a bag of weed, and you got yourself one hell of a Friday night.

only one version of the Lightning II, the F-35B, is built with that capability, the rest require a standard take-off method. remove that variant from the comparison and the Checkmate still costs less than half as much as all the example competitors this video mentions, except for the JAS-35E.